Why some female teachers have sex with schoolboys

http://theothermccain.com/2016/09/13/teacher-had-sex-with-12-year-old-boy/

http://news3lv.com/news/local/former-teachernicole-willfinger-charged-with-sex-with-student-to-face-stricter-penalties

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/female-teacher-admits-having-sex-8383454

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3549878/Female-teacher-27-sex-16-year-old-boy-faces-jail-admitting-six-month-relationship-child.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10578951/Female-history-teacher-who-shared-bed-with-two-schoolboys-banned-from-classroom-for-sexual-misconduct.html

Not only are men lower than sluts, sluts are now corrupting the morals of boys.

The best way of corrupting boys is to give them sex before they even ask for it, so they will always yearn to be taken by a woman the way a woman is taken by a man.

Men now yearn to be dominated by women, to be disciplined and punished. It turns them on.

The more power men give to women, the more they will take, and to be weak is to invite exploitation.

It is clearly the intention of these immoral female teachers to corrupt the morals of adolescent schoolboys in their charge in order to destroy their masculinity as adult men. You won't have much masculinity to display if all the while you are seeking a woman who is older than you who will dominate you and boss you around. Give such a man who has been got at by an older woman a submissive woman, and he won't know what to do with her.

Men who are submissive to women and addicted to sex with sluts are easy to control. Such men would never be able to recognise a principle, much less stand up and fight for it. Such men would be spiritually incapable of standing up for the patriarchy and incapable of even desiring a patriarchy because patriarchy supports marriage and this by definition means it would forbid and punish extramarital sex, which is the very thing they are constantly craving for.

Sex addicted men are not interested in marrying and having progeny, but in merely continuing to enjoy sex with women they are not married to. Most men in the West are MCSFs - Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage.

Such men would be spiritually incapable of protecting their women from invaders. Men with no wives and offspring are not going to risk anything to protect sluts or random women from invaders. They can't even get it together to challenge the status quo - feminism- after all.

Talking to Western men about this is like talking to drug-addicted and intoxicated men who are incapable of focusing on the matter at hand, much less being persuaded by the case I have put to them for supporting marriage.

All they will be capable of doing is denying that things are as bad as they say they are and then changing the subject to something they would much rather talk and think about, probably the next fix of extramarital sex they hope to get.

I guess we women in the West will be taken as slaves and sex slaves by invaders because our men are too weak, gay and old to defend us.

The invaders will be predictably Muslim, and Western women will have no choice.

Perhaps surrender will be sweet, precisely because it is inevitable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_a_Scandal_(film)

In a matriarchy, older and wiser heterosexual men are lower in status to the bimbo and gay man

War reporter Michael Buerk: I'm sick of being lectured to by celebs like Cumberbatch

In a matriarchy, foolish young men women find attractive have more influence than wiser older men whom sluts don't want to fuck. This neatly explains why the entire liberal-feminist establishment of the West hates Trump: women don't want to fuck him because they think he is ugly as well as finding him threatening and offensive. 

Female preferences take over when men surrender to sluts.

Men surrender to sluts when they no longer support marriage.

They no longer support marriage because there is no need for them to marry in order to have sex, because fornicating sluts are a dime a dozen. (Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?)

Feminism bribes men with cheap slut sex to keep them quiescent.

Men will do anything for sex, including marry, and they no longer need to marry to get sex because sluts are everywhere.

Sluts are everywhere because feminism has turned women into sluts, children into bastards, men into Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers and our civilisation to shit.

We now have an Idiocracy.

Men no longer support marriage when they dare not uncompromisingly support marriage.

The only way to uncompromisingly support marriage is to forbid and punish extramarital sex.  

quran.com/4/15

quran.com/4/16

quran.com/24/2

No man in the West is prepared to do this because all the men in the West have surrendered to sluts.

You may have heard of a book called The Surrendered Wife: A Practical Guide To Finding Intimacy, Passion And Peace With Your Man.  Someone should write a book about The Surrendered Man (also known as the Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker).  

Should MCSF and SPOSSM bachelors be treated as second class citizens?

Not only do British men not have an alpha male to lead them, most of them are omega males afraid of omega females

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/marriage-is-eugenic-bastardy-dysgenic.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/claire-khaws-class-and-gender-theory-of.html

Helen was a slut, Paris was an MCSF and Troy fell because it protected them. The West is Troy.

Helen and Menelaus: Menelaus intends to strike Helen; captivated by her beauty, he drops his sword. A flying Eros and Aphrodite (on the left) watch the scene. Detail of an Attic red-figure krater, c. 450–440 BC (Paris, Louvre)

Men who have sex with sluts are called MCSFs, expalined at
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

Helen To Menelaos

Well, in any case, since you see me as your enemy, you won’t be responding to my arguments, even if they are just. So, all I can do is argue against the accusations I think you’ll be making against me.

[Indicating Hekabe]

First of all, you should direct your accusations at her.

It was she, Hekabe, who gave birth to Paris and it was then when our troubles began.

The destruction of Troy –and of my own- came about because of Priam, her husband, who should have killed Paris. He should have done that when Paris was a baby. 920

That baby visited her in her dream when she was pregnant with him, as a blazing torch.

But listen to what followed his birth, the birth of Paris.

It was this man who judged the three goddesses in a beauty contest.

Palas Athena bribed him by promising him that he would head the Trojan army against Greece and destroy her utterly.

Hera’s promise, on the other hand, was that, if he gave her the prize, he would be made ruler of all Asia and Europe but Aphrodite, who knew and admired my beauty, told him that her prize to him, if he declared her the most beautiful of the three goddesses, would be me.

So, now listen to what happened after that. 931

Aphrodite, of course, won the contest and that victory brought about my relationship with Paris a relationship, Menelaos, that proved to be of benefit to Greece.

How? Because the Greeks are not ruled by barbarians which would have happened if Paris had chosen one of the other two goddesses.

You were neither beaten by a foreign army nor were you ruled by a foreign king.

Greece benefited from my misfortune. Greece has gained happiness whilst I gained misery. Because of my beauty, I was sold; and, instead of crowning my head with garlands, the Greeks now treat me with disdain.

Of course, I know, you’ll now tell me that all this doesn’t explain my sliding out of your house secretly.

The explanation is that Paris came to Sparta with an ally, an ally who is not at all insignificant. The goddess Aphrodite herself was with him and so – call him Paris or call him Alexandros – it was he who has destroyed this land.

And it was you, you despicable man, you who let Paris come into our palace and then left him there while you went off to Crete! 942

Never mind!

As for what happened afterwards, it’s not to you I’ll direct my questions my to me!

What got over me?

What on earth made me leave my country and my home to follow him here?

If you must punish anyone, Menelaus, then punish Zeus!

Come, are you strong enough to do that?

Punish that god because even though he rules all the other gods, he is Aphrodite’s little slave!

Go on! Punish him and pardon me!

This is where you could make some wise comments: You could say that since Paris was killed and hurled into the underworld and my god-driven marriage dissolved, I should have left my marriage home and come to the Greek ships. 951

But that’s exactly what I wanted to do!

Ask the guards of the walls and the watchmen at the towers. They will be my witness. They will tell you that they’ve caught me often enough using ropes, trying to sneak down from the battlements of the city but my second husband, Deiphobus would always catch me and drag me back into his house, even against the will of the rest of the Trojans.

Well then, my husband? After all my efforts to come to you, should you not be giving me an award for bravery instead of killing me? Another man has taken me into his home and made me his slave. Would not the award rather than the death be more just? 961

Who can argue against the will of the gods? And if that’s what you want to do, then someone better tell you quickly how stupid that would be!

HECABE :

My son was handsome beyond all other men, when you saw him your became the goddess. All the indiscretions of mortals pass for Aphrodite and it is appropriate that the goddess's name begins with folly. You saw him resplendent in his foreign costume and you went out of your mind. For, living in modest circumstances as you were in Greece, you hoped that, once you had shaken off the dust of Sparta, you would enjoy a riot of extravagance in the city of the Phrygians that flowed with gold. Menelaus' palace gave little scope for the life of luxury you wanted to revel in.

So much for that idea. Force was used by my son, you say, when he took you away. Why then was this not noticed by any of the Spartans? Did you scream for assistance from Castor or his brother? They were still there, young and strong, as yet not raised to the stars. When you came to Troy, with the Greeks hot on your trail, and the deadly clash of spears began, any news of Menelaus' success you greeted with, 'My brave Menelaus, hoping to vex my son with the thought he had a powerful rival for your love. But if ever Fortune favoured the Trojans, Menelaus was forgotten. You kept an eye on chance and and studied how to follow in her footsteps, but virtue held no such attractions for you.

Then you describe how you were so reluctant to stay that you used a rope to lower yourself in secret from the battlements. Were you discovered anywhere tying a noose to your neck or sharpening a sword, the course of action a woman of honour would have taken if she yearned for the husband she once had? And yet how often I urged you to act: 'Leave here, my daughter! My sons will find new brides; I will smuggle you out safely to the ships of the Greeks. Bring this fighting between the Greeks and ourselves to an end! But this was not at all to your taste. You were playing the great lady in the house of Alexandros and wanted foreign servants to bow low before you. This was what mattered to you.

And after all this you come out here, you abominable creature, tricked out in these fine clothes, and look your husband in the eye, under the same sky! You should have come out humbly in tattered clothes, quaking with fear, your head shaven, with a modest bearing rather than a shameless air, in view of your past crimes.

Menelaus, so that you know how I mean to end my speech, crown Greece as your good name requires by killing this woman and establishing this law for the rest of womankind: the penalty for betraying one's husband is death.  

[The Koran is rather kinder to adulteresses at 24:2 http://quran.com/24/2]


CHORUS-LEADER

Menelaus, punish your wife as your forefathers and house would approve. Show yourself noble in your enemies' eyes and prevent your fellow-Greeks from charging you with unmanliness.

MENELAUS:

We have arrived at the same conclusion, you and I, that this woman of her own choice left my house to share a stranger's bed.  [To HELEN:] Off with you  now to the place of stoning! I want you to die and pay in an instant for the years of suffering endured by the Greeks; I want you to learn not to bring disgrace upon me! 

HELEN [throwing herself in front of him and clasping at his knees]:

No, I beg you, do not make me guilty of the madness of the goddesses and kill me! Show me some understanding! 

HECABE:

Do not betray the men she killed, your comrades-in-arms! I entreat you in their name, in their children's name!

MENELAUS:

Enough, old woman. I pay her no attention. [To his servants:] Away with her, take her off to the ship that will carry her over the sea!

HECABE:

Do not let her board the same ship as you!

MENELAUS:

Why ever not? Does she weigh more than she used to?

HECABE:

There is no lover who does not love for ever.  

MENELAUS:

That depends on how lovers view matters. But I will do as you wish: she will afford a different ship from mine; for there is actually sense in what you say. And once she gets to Argos she will meet a foul end as befits so foul a creature and make all women curb their lustful instincts. This is no easy task, but just the same her execution will strike fear into their wanton hearts, even if their shamelessness exceeds hers. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_of_Troy suggests the slut got away with it. I propose that a prize be awarded to a modern playwright who produces the best play about how things were between Menelaus and Helen after their return to Sparta from Troy, called The Euripides Prize of Modern Greek Tragedy.

History only repeats itself for our benefit because we refuse to learn its lessons.

How much would you be praising Tommy Connolly if he were your son?

Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by mercatornet.

"Mothers of bastards are sluts, mostly parasitical sluts too. They should be shamed, not encouraged.

Let us hope that this good-hearted young man will not have his future compromised by letting in this parasitical slut and expending his energy and resources maintaining her and her bastard. I wonder what his parents and family think."

Sprinters are not really the brightest bulbs in the box, are they?

http://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/student-adopts-his-homeless-pregnant-cousin/16000

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

@mercatornet Are Western men too tolerant of parasitic sluts? http://t.co/2ni4VqbIzs
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 20, 2015

@mercatornet Are most Western men MCSFs and aspiring SPOSSMs? http://t.co/u1fEKbqa7r
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 20, 2015

@mercatornet Should Spinster Single Mothers be lashed 100 times? https://t.co/TWGte1gdsM
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 20, 2015

@mercatornet Is Tommy Connolly a fool and will his unmarried slut of a cousin suck him dry and ruin his life if he is not careful?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 20, 2015

@mercatornet How would you feel if you were the parent of Tommy Connolly? Not as pleased as the libtards praising him, I bet.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 20, 2015

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/1cr6lm/what_is_a_white_knight/

I agree with a libtard that God is an instrument of government but he blocks me anyway

The removal of regimes in the world & their replacement with Shari'ah will take mankind out of worshipping his desires to worshipping Allah!
— Anjem Choudary (@anjemchoudary) January 25, 2015

What is with this constant need to be worshiped? What is he, the God of insecurity? @anjemchoudary @ntfem
— Jamie Foster (@1jamiefoster) January 25, 2015

@1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary It is not so much God needing to be worshipped as it being good for mankind to obey His laws.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @ntfem @anjemchoudary At least SUN Worship was Practical .Its the Sun that Keeps us Alive not SKY FAIRIES or PROPHETS
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary The Koran contains what are said to be God's laws. Which ones do you object to?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary All of them they were invented by Men for men they are all BULLSHIT . Just Control
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary God is indeed an instrument of government.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary GOD is like TOTAL WORLD PEACE it's ALL in the Head ...a Delusion .
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary Doesn't matter what people believe as long as they obey the law.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary I matters when what they belive is Killing those that Dont think like they do
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary Liberals bomb Muslims in Muslim countries for not agreeing with liberalism, don't they?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary AS Long as there is RELIGION & Men to Corrupt it There will never EVER be Peace on this PLANET
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary Religion = Politics. You want to ban politics?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary If you want to ban religion you have to ban politics.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary If you want to ban politics what you will end up doing is banning free speech.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary The price of liberty is eternal vigilance by the wise, and most people are fools n knaves.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary Can I ask you are you a Muslim Convert ? Your Manner gives that Impression ?
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary My belief is like traffic lights: from disbelief to doubt, doubt to belief and back again.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary So in Truth your just MIXED UP ?
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary You don't have to believe in God to think that the 10 commandments make sense.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary I believe in calling a spade a spade and a slut a slut.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary You don't have to believe in God to know that marriage can only be maintained by law.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary You don't have to believe in God to accept that marriage is necessary for social stability
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary You don't have to believe in God to know that most atheist voters don't support marriage.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary You don't have to believe in God to know that the minds of sheeple are easily changed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem @Tiksaw @1jamiefoster @anjemchoudary After Reading your Tweets I see that
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann What do you see from my tweets?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem I dont Agree with a Single thing you say But Im not going to stoop to Insults so I think it Best we End this Discusion Now ....PEACE
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann You don't have to stoop to insults, just tell me if I have said anything that is based on incorrect information.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann You don't have to stoop to insults, just refute my arguments.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann You don't have to stoop to insults, just tell if my reasoning is illogical, but you can't, can you?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann All you know is that I have blasphemed against your deities of feminism, sexual liberation and sluts, and it does not compute.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann Don't worry, I am used to atheists like you, who behave just like a primitive tribesman who has just had his idol smashed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann All you can is "Let's agree to disagree" cos you can't think of anything to say. Maybe you know someone cleverer who can?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem Ok see you've had to become a BITCH about this The truth is Im just Bored with you not because i Can't Argue my case
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann No, honestly, if u can't think of anything to refute my arguments maybe another libtard cleverer than you can. Off to the pub?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann I am sure you can find lots of much cleverer libtards than you at the pub. Maybe a libtard lawyer?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem Look I've already told you I dont Agree with your Veiw I have better things to talk about so Enjoy your Sunday with someone who does
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann Thank you so very much for being yet another libtard who cannot think of anything that might refute or rebut my arguments.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann Don't feel too bad about it. I know musicians and songwriters are not very analytical and run on sluts and groupies.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann Libtards pretend to be bored when they run out of arguments. Only another libtard would believe your crap.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@ntfem OK your stupidity finally came out ...BYE NUTCASE
— Amun Ra (@KevinMcVann) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann I was right about you and most other men in the West being mostly MCSFs who won't be supporting marriage any time soon.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann MCSF = Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker who hopes for sex with women not his wife cos he is potless and unmarriageable.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann Under Secular Koranism, brothels will be legal so the cost of sex will still be reassuringly low for men like you.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

@KevinMcVann You and your mates may find http://t.co/V3lnCFY0BI instructive about what to do with sluts: pump and dump.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 25, 2015

Should Julien Blanc be in a BBC documentary to analyse the effectiveness of his seduction techniques?

Sick 'seduction guru' who tells men to woo women by CHOKING them  http://t.co/mmZulhN1VR via @Femail But how many sluts wd still fuck him?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

Sick 'seduction guru' who tells men to woo women by CHOKING them  http://t.co/mmZulhN1VR Sluts probably enjoy being grabbed by the throat?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

Sick 'seduction guru' who tells men to woo women by CHOKING them  http://t.co/mmZulhN1VR If u r not a slut u have nothing to fear from him.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

@ERN_Malleyscrub @chmeredith @rustyrockets I am IN FAVOUR of allowing Julien Blanc into Britain. UK Home Secretary is female though.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

It seems I am the only woman in Britain prepared to say that Julien Blanc should be admitted to the country cos he is doing what sluts want.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

I am sure there are plenty of sluts who would let Julien Blanc do what he will do to them EVEN NOW AND ENJOY IT.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

I suppose what these feminists sluts object to is Julien Blanc saying derogatory things about sluts after fucking them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

I think feminist sluts should know that men other than Julien Blanc are often derogatory about men who fuck sluts they don't love.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

I bet there are lots of women still prepared to demonstrate the effectiveness of Julien Blanc's techniques on stage for all to see.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

Feminist sluts are trying to stop Julien Blanc from entering Britain just for doing to them what they want: seducing and then fucking them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

The reason why feminist sluts want to punish Julien Blanc is not because he seduces and screws sluts but because he is rude about sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

I wonder if feminist sluts know that Julien Blanc is not the only man who is rude about sluts they have fucked. If not they must stupid/deaf
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

It seems Julien Blanc is being punished for doing what other men do to sluts: pump and dump/fuck and forget. Why are sluts victimising him?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

Should I start a hashtag about, er, #lettingJulienBlanccomeinsideyou? #takedownjulienblanc #JulienBlanc #takedownrsd #TakeDownRSDNation
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

I don't see why feminist sluts are making such a fuss about Julien Blanc entering a matriarchy where slut-fucking is a national sport.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 15, 2014

MCSFs explained

Sluts and degrees of sluttery

All you have to do is turn a slut on and she will will let you fuck her. If it is OK for women to have sex for fun, why is it not OK for men to want to make sluts let them fuck them?

I am a little curious about his techniques.

I think the BBC should have a camera crew follow him around to film what happens and pay him a big fat fee for the privilege.

Slut volunteers should be recruited to analyse his techniques then tested for arousal http://io9.com/5214130/seven-mostly-scientific-devices-for-measuring-sexual-arousal and willingness to comply with his suggestions for sex acts and sexual intercourse after  he has made his moves.

Is it a sign of moral degeneracy that neither the BNP nor Adam Rutherford will discuss the eugenic nature and purpose of marriage?

You can breed plants and animals to breed in desirable characteristics and breed out undesirable characteristics.

However, since we are not farm animals and no one breeds us, sexual reproduction is left to the female. It is ALWAYS left to the female if you discount rape.

It is therefore imperative that the morals of the female are rational and responsible to prevent degeneracy.

However, since most men cannot get enough of free and cheap sex, most men are not going to do anything to limit the supply of slut sex.

The men who do not want to limit the supply of free and cheap sex are heterosexual bachelors and MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers).

Most British women are sluts, most British mothers are SSMs, most men are MCSFs and most people are bastards in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

Worse, Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland and the rest of the West practice a system called representative democracy in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage.

The flaw of representative democracy is that it is unnecessarily divisive and the flaw of indiscriminate universal suffrage is that if the majority of voters are MCSFs, sluts and SSMs, they will never vote to change the system. Most drunkards and addicts will not think of seeking a cure until they have hit rock bottom. Decline is therefore terminal.

No one in the land is even acknowledging that anything needs to be done.

There are 5 stages of grief and nationalists have not even got past the first stage, which is DENIAL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model

Because most people are atheists now, they are basically selfish sluts and bastards who don't care what happens after they die as long as they can carry on enjoying cheap slut sex.

Many people do not have children and those who do have children did not bring them up properly and probably do not much care for their ill-bred children even if they are still in touch with them.

These people only care about filling their boots before they die and don't give a damn about the mess they leave behind.

That is probably the reason why so many ethno-nationalists cannot bring themselves to support marriage.

They won't support marriage because they don't want to get married or already know that they are unmarriageable. If they supported marriage they would be mocked like an ugly woman with pock-marked face would be mocked if she tried selling face cream called beauty cream.

That is why no nationalist male will ever support marriage.

Even scientists are so infected by PC Libtardism that a scientist presenting a programme on eugenics pointedly blocked me on Twitter just for pointing this out at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/dr-adam-rutherford-does-not-mention.html.  Whither moral and intellectual integrity?

Dr Adam Rutherford - a scientist of integrity or just another pretty boy?
He blocked me on Twitter just for saying that he should consider the role of marriage in eugenics.

Below are some questions for Adam Rutherford to consider.

1. Is marriage eugenic?
2. Is wisdom eugenic?
3. Is feminism dysgenic?
4. Is chastity eugenic?
5. Is morality eugenic?
6. Is free speech eugenic?
7. Is the purpose of eugenics to make your people who practise its principles better than other people who don't?
8. What does it say about your moral and intellectual integrity if you refuse to discuss these questions when you discuss eugenics and block Claire Khaw on Twitter just for pointing this out to you?
9. Do PC Libtards find it hard to admit that PC Libtardism is dysgenic?
10. If you say it is OK for women to be sluts, is it any surprise that they start fucking losers and lunatics at taxpayers' expense?
11. Are you an MCSF http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html if you as a male academic presenting a programme about eugenics refrain from criticising government policy of paying SSMs to breed bastards?

@ntfem because you are weapons grade bore who fills my timeline with irrelevant and tedious ramblings.
— Dr. Adam Rutherford (@AdamRutherford) May 8, 2014

@AdamRutherford How is marriage *not* eugenic?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 8, 2014

@AdamRutherford If I rather belaboured the point it is cos I want liberals to be in no doubt as to the link between sluts and degeneracy.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 8, 2014

@AdamRutherford I also know that for PC Libtards and feminists the right to have extramarital sex is regarded as sacred and unchallengeable.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 8, 2014

@AdamRutherford It is an omission not to take into account of marriage as the machinery for the functioning of eugenics in its purest form.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 8, 2014

Why Trojan Horse Muslim parents don't want sex education and co-ed schools

Because it turns their daughters into sluts and their sons into MCSFs.

This is precisely what the Trojan Horse Muslim parents http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10790441/Guide-to-school-Islamisation-by-ringleader-of-Trojan-Horse-plot.html wish to prevent by banning sex education from Birmingham state schools who are majority-Muslim. There are in fact many non-Muslim parents who want to do the same thing who would support such organisations as the Family Education Trust. http://www.famyouth.org.uk/ Being Christian, they can't act their act together to do so, because we know that Christianity and hypocrisy go hand in hand, and cowardice is the main ingredient of hypocrisy.

Perhaps they have reason to fear. A High Court judge was forced to resign because he dared to support marriage. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2526180/Anger-judge-forced-resign-championing-marriage-Sir-Paul-Coleridge.html (We should discover the names of the his colleagues who opposed his views, should we not? Any judge who opposes marriage must be morally suspect, must s/he not?)

Why might Muslims want to segregate the sexes?

Is it because they want their sons to learn masculine values - and more importantly, learn the skills of leadership and character that would help their sons become leaders and alpha males - that are more easily inculcated in an all-male environment?

Leadership skills should be taught in boys' schools, or ought to be.

In a co-ed environment, the perceived alpha male is the one the girls go for. So boys are psyched to learn how to please girls from early adolescence. That is why the morals of this country have turned into the SHIT they have become.

The more I think of it the more I think the Trojan Horse Muslim parents have it right. I rather admire the way to have got it together to try to do what they did.

Lots of non-Muslim parents want to withdraw their sons and daughters from sex ed, because it turns their daughters into sluts and the sons into MCSFs.  (The MCSF is explained at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html.) Too bad the people at The Family Education Trust, The Marriage Foundation, The Christian Institute, Christian Concern and The Conservative Women don't have the guts to say so, and are secretly glad in their Islamophobic way that the more enterprising Muslim parents have got themselves into trouble again with the liberal establishment.

We live in a matriarchy and all matriarchies are pornocracies.  The pornocracy recruits fresh blood by turning our sons into MCSFs and our daughters into sluts.

Most British women are sluts these days.

Sluts (women who have sex with men not their husbands) tend to become SSMs. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

Most British mothers are SSMs. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

'The whites have become black' says David Starkey. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517

By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. http://www.rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/

The real root of crime in Jamaica where 85% of mothers are SSMs. http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

The Bhagavad Gita indicates the position we should take on SSMs if we are to save our civilisation.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/the-bhagavad-gita-indicates-position-we.html

Are 83% of female MPs morally corrupt, compared to only 48% of male MPs?
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html

Cultural Collapse Theory  http://www.rooshv.com/cultural-collapse-theory

Remember: all advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive and declining civilisations are matriarchal.  

A patriarchy condones male promiscuity while a matriarchy condones and rewards female promiscuity.

A properly regulated patriarchy would have an alpha male.

In a matriarchy all males are afraid of criticising sluts. This means all males are lower than the omega female. The omega female would be considered the least desirable female if you are looking for a wife and mother for your children, because she has already given birth to some other man's bastard - the SSM. The deemed alpha male of Britain is its Prime Minister. Is David Cameron afraid of cirticising SSMs, who have the vote? Does any leader of any political party in the UK dare to criticise SSMs, who have the vote?

It is dangerous to allow your society to become a matriarchy because matriarchies are atomised societies - the opposite of being socially cohesive - who are vulnerable to their internal and external enemies.

Who are the internal enemies of any society? Socialists, sluts and their running dogs, I would suggest.

How to solve the problem of matriarchal hegemony http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/too-many-women-have-vote-and-solution.html

Out of two evils, it would be moral and rational to choose the lesser evil, and it is clear that the patriarchy is the lesser evil.

Please help me save Western civilisation from sluts.  All other races and nations who have enjoyed the benefits of Western civilisation should have a care too.

Tolerating illegitimacy is the act of allowing your race to be taken over by an inferior race.  Their agents are the SSM, the cancer of your society.



How chasing the female vote took away our liberty and increased our taxes
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html

Why are white men more afraid to challenge feminism than black men?

Have white men had cowardice injected into their veins?

A black female Facebook friend said to me that she thought the reason why black men weren't afraid to speak their minds is because they have nothing to lose.

If white men carry on the way they are carrying on, they will soon have nothing to lose either.

I don't think men in the BNP have anything to lose. Perhaps their pride prevents them from seeing this, which is why they shrink for speaking the truth.

What is the truth I wish them to speak?

I merely wish them to agree with me on the following:

1. The British do not respect marriage.
2. The British do not respect marriage because the overwhelming number of them are feminists.
3. A feminist is someone who refuses to contemplate both the repeal of the Equality Act 2010 and the abolition of no fault divorce.
4. Feminism undermines marriage.  
5. Feminism is supported by two pillars: the Equality Act 2010 and no fault divorce.
6. Any ideology that  undermines the sanctity of marriage is bad for society.
7. Feminism should be discredited as a moral, rational and sustainable ideology.  

The black female Facebook friend in America tells me that the only white man that she  can think of here who actually speaks against feminism is a radio host named Tom Leykis.  "The feminists HATE him, because he speaks very bluntly about SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts, welfare moms, fat women etc."

The most prominent anti-feminist in academia, Chris Brand, was insane enough to argue in favour of paedophilia.

"Brand argued that sex with a consenting partner over the age of 12 was not harmful so long as both partners had an above-average IQ."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Brand

Not so clever.


The other one is Simon Sheppard, a known antisemite and a convicted political criminal who has served time.  His ideas are too complicated for the uneducated inadequate men who flock to anti-immigration parties to understand, so they mock him.  Worse, their leader, Nick Griffin, is too afraid of explaining anything to them, fearing their wrath, malice and incomprehension.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/simon-sheppard-arrested-for-sending.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/man-in-york-acquitted-but-told-not-to.html


Are there men who are not losers, paedos, perverts or antisemites who are also antifeminists?

Most British men are too afraid to be seen to agree with him in case their slut girlfriends dump them or withhold sex from them.

My black female Muslim Facebook friend agreed and said

"Which means that most of them are beta losers, because an alpha would never be afraid of not getting sex, not in western society where women freely hand it to them!  You'd think that the betas would be the most outspoken against feminism, because it's the traditional society--the society which restricted female sexual behavior to marriage--that evens the playing field for them! Then again, maybe they are not up to the responsibility of marriage?"

Simon at least has sublimated his energies, though doubtless there are many nationalist men with female partners who pity him and say they pity him.

But Simon is better than all of them put together. I actually have more respect for Simon than all of them put together, because Simon has an idea that he is not afraid to propagate. He does not fear the slut and he does not fear the men who act in service of the matriarchy.

And he does not have a wife.

If you lived in the UK you would be frightened of your wife.

If he hates her he would fear her. If he loves her he would also fear her.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584905/Judge-accuses-control-500million-divorce-case-clogging-courts-denying-people-precious-court-time.html is the reason why a wealthy husband would be afraid of his wife.

As for men who only fornicate with their slut female partners, they would be afraid of offending her because the consequence of doing so would be that of sex being withdrawn or the relationship being ended.

That is why it is so important to have principles, or all you end up doing is being pussywhipped by the woman you hate or love.

Men who don't live in the UK don't understand the problem nor men who have less money than their wives. Certainly men who are not married, do not want to marry or are in fact unmarriageable would not understand the problem.  These beta-omega males are in the majority though.

Feminism has pretty much got men stitched up.  If they have money they are afraid of losing it.  If they haven't got money but have a female partner they have to pretend that the are happy with the situation.  If they have neither money nor a female partner then the best they can hope for is sex from a slut because they are too poor to pay for a sex with a prostitute.

None of these men are going to risk their property and their access to sex by saying anything that might even offend a feminist and most women are feminists these days.

Who is a feminist?  A person who refuses to propose repealing the Equality Act 2010 nor the abolition of no-fault divorce.  This would mean most men and most women in the West.  This includes Nigel Farage and Nick Griffin who have wives they must be afraid of.

When I explain the problem to a man who lives in Korea he said, and I paraphrase : "Fuck those beta male losers, it wouldn't happen to me."

Quite.  "Fuck the beta losers, let no man marry in future, and let no woman marry either."

That is how the white man thinks. If he is a man who doesn't have a wife and doesn't want to marry, he won't trouble himself about the divorce laws.

Most supporters of racist anti-immigration parties are not married, do not want to get married or are in fact unmarriageable, and they all think like this.

I call men who  have sex but not with their wives MCSFs - Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers.

These MCSFs fuck only sluts or SSMs and their children are usually bastards.

I am saying this is the reason for the degeneracy of the white race.

They don't like hearing this, of course, so they call me mad.

Obviously, a race of bastards whose parents are SSMs and MCSFs cannot be expected to do better than other races and nations whose people are not mostly bastards.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html  Most British mothers sluts and most British babies bastards.

It really isn't rocket science at all.

But these nationalists pretend not to get it and like to blame Jews and Muslims etc rather than the sluts they fuck or the wives they are afraid of.

They like pretending they don't know what I am on about when I propose to abolish no fault divorce.

Nobody else is saying it, so you must be mad, they say.

These are just beta males of course. They don't trust their own views and are always looking around them to see what others are thinking to see if it is safe to agree with me. It is not safe to agree with me.

Black female Muslim Facebook friend:

NO man wants to marry really. They just want to fuck. It's WOMEN who are key in all this. Men no longer have to care about marriage because women no longer demand it in order for men to get the goodies.

The solution is simple: slut-shaming.

But white men in the West are too pussywhipped to say so, for all reasons I have already mentioned.

Soon most babies born in the West will be bastards and their mothers will be like this woman at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9l_909Yx-c  This means most babies will have mothers who are stupid SSMs and fathers who are MCSFs. 

Please help me save Western civilisation from the Slut who is feared by all men in the West.  

Points to note about SSMs and the men who are afraid of them:

1. The most desirable female is a young and attractive female without "baggage".
2. The less desirable female is a not so young and not so attractive female without "baggage".
3. The least desirable female is a female with "baggage" ie the illegitimate offspring of another man.
4. An omega female is the least desirable partner for a man looking for a wife and a mother for his children.  An SSM is therefore an omega female.  
5. If all men are afraid of omega females then all men are lower than omega females. "We know who is in power by those whom we cannot criticise."  
6. Men who are afraid of females stupider, poorer, weaker and lower in morals than they are are beyond contempt.  

A matriarchy expressed algebraically:

SSM > all men

Omega Female > all men

Matriarchy = Pornocracy

A patriarchy expressed algebraically:

Alpha Male > Alpha Female

Alpha Male > Beta Male

Beta Male > Beta Female

Beta Male > Omega Male

Which society do you think will be run on moral and rational principles?  

Which society do you think will crash and burn very soon?

Is it racist to mind *more* that your women are victims of sex predators of *another* race than sex predators of your *own* race?

Is it racist to feel that your women being groomed by sex predators of another race is worse than being groomed by sex predators of their own race?

The correct answer is as follows:

"It is racist, but I am entitled to feel greater anger and disgust as long as I do not propose that sex predators of another race be punished by law more harshly than indigenous sex predators."

While it didn't make any difference to their victims who were presumably prepared to have sex with their non-white boyfriends, though not to be passed around to their mates like a parcel, the fact is that these females initially agreed to have sex with these sex predators.

Are not all men who want sex really sex predators though?  Do not all sex predators try to "groom" women with treats and gifts either for sex or marriage?

The offence that is felt is the offence of white men who feel it is certainly much worse to have the women of their race become the victims of sex predators of men of other races.  

Is this feeling racist and therefore evil?  Not at all, I would argue.  Men of X race ought to feel more offended at the thought of sex predators of Y race sexually abusing their females, simply because they should be concerned about protecting women of their race.  The fact that more and more of their women are falling into the hands of sex predators of other races suggests things are not what they should be.   Is it because men are failing to protect their daughters?  But these adolescent girls are mostly fatherless.  Is it because the mothers of these adolescent victims have the morals of a sewer and only had their illegitimate and fatherless children so they could claim child benefit? If this is the case, then they ought to do something, but not a bit of it, and their continual whine about Muslims remains unabated, for their SSMs can do no wrong.  

If you leave food uncovered and flies come, whose fault is it that they come?  If you eat this food and you fall ill, whose fault is it?  Why, the flies' of course, and not the slut and the filthy slattern who couldn't be arsed to cover up the food or put it in the fridge.   To blame her would mean that she will refuse you sexual access to her body, and then where will you be?

I am capable of making creative points like this, while the old duffers at the BDP can only come up with boring old shit like http://britishdemocraticparty.org/the-right-and-wrong-kinds-of-moderation-and-extremism/

I demonstrably can plead the white male's case better than any white male in British nationalism, but they do not want me in their party, and I know precisely why.  It is because they are too afraid of offending their women by seeming to have anything to do with me.

What is so extraordinary about me, even if I do say so myself, as a female and a racial foreigner, is that I understand the male psyche because I think like one.  Not only do I think like a man, I actually think like an alpha male, and that is what freaks them out so much.

If I were white and male they would be begging me to lead them.  But if I were white and an alpha male, I would not want to associate with these beta and omega males because it would be bad for business and my wife would be so angry with me she would divorce me, deprive me of my children and probably allow my daughter to become a slut and even an SSM.  That was why Nick Griffin said: "Those who want my job cannot do it, and those who can do my job don't want it."

It is also very interesting that those who pop up from time to time to jeer at me that I have get myself precisely nowhere in politics because no party will not have me always run away when I invite them to consider why they will not have me.

They will not have me because what I say is unpopular, granted, but aren't these social and political pariahs already used to being shunned by all and sundry?

My anti-feminist stance is potentially more popular than an anti-immigration stance.  This is simply because most men and women are looking for a sex partner or a spouse, and their numbers will always exceed people who are bothered about immigration.  

Why don't they do something motherhood and apple pie instead and start supporting marriage, by defining it, discussing its purpose in the scheme of things and proposing policies that might support marriage?

They would have to define marriage as something that can only be legal and proper between a man and a woman of age and with consent not within the forbidden degrees of consanguinity for the purpose of procreation and the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions.

They would have to say that to respect marriage one must abolish no-fault divorce or what in effect amounts to this, and declare that gay marriage is the penultimate way of desecrating marriage.  The ultimate way of desecrating marriage would be of course to forbid heterosexual couples from marrying and only allow same-sex couples to do so.

Clearly, a nation of sluts and bastards, SSMs, SPOSSMs and MCSFs would have no respect for marriage which they regard as "a piece of paper" not fit to wipe their bottoms with.

The Islamophobes who go on and on and on about Muslim grooming completely ignore that that the total number of white sex predators significantly exceeds that of non-white sex predators. But they only focus on the fact that these sex predators are Muslim, and nobody cares to put them right on the fact that the total number of convicted indigenous sex offenders far far far exceed the total number of non-white sex offenders. Are they really too stupid to get this or just too scared to acknowledge the truth of this?

These same Islamophobes also refuse to address the question of why so many white girls become the victims of sex predators. There are plenty of women who have their illegitimate offspring and use them to claim child benefit.  When they are old enough to be interesting to the SPOSSMs of their single mothers, they get kicked out of by her, or they get into trouble and find themselves in a care home where they are so ineffectively controlled that they become the victims of sex predators before too long.

Why do these nationalists never address this issue?  Is it because they fear the wrath of SSMs, and their women are now mostly SSMs?   It is safe to criticise Muslims, but not SSMs.  These sex-obsessed men reason that because they don't want to have sex with Muslims, they can criticise them all they like.  However, because it is precisely SSMs they hope to have sex with they must not criticise them, for to criticise them would result in losing sexual access to them, a false rape allegation or perhaps even a false accusation of paedophilia.  That is why these low-born, sex-hungry jobless men who cannot afford a prostitute much less a wife cannot ever get it together to criticise feminism or sluts.

As for alpha males who do have a bit of money, they would be wise to not marry any woman for to do so would leave them with half their property open to spousal confiscation.

While I know how detestable it is for these men find it to acknowledge the horrible irony of a female and a racial foreigner being the only person in the land ideally suited and capable of saving them from their women, it is perhaps something they should come to terms with.

When they do finally come to terms with this, they could think about appointing me as the Media Spokesman of UKIP, BNP, or BDP.  

BNP in cahoots with LibLabCon?

Maybe the BNP and the LibLabCon are in cahoots with each other.

The BNP need bastards and sluts to join their party.  Out of all the political parties in that you may have heard of, the BNP has the highest rate of illegitimacy and women in the BNP can hold a disproportionate amount of power.  Is Mrs Griffin, the BNP Chairman's wife, the power behind the BNP throne?  Is Jennifer Griffin, his daughter?

I have been told by Jim Dowson that discussions around the Griffins' kitchen table reveal the Griffin women to be feminists.  If that is the case, they will certainly not be criticising or questioning feminism or allowing the head of the household to do so.

Readers should note the following facts:

1. The LibLabCon have policies that create more sluts and bastards. 
2. Neither the BNP nor the LibLabCon nor UKIP will criticise sluts.

The PERFECT conspiracy?

A conspiracy by whom, you ask. A conspiracy by the matriarchy, of course, to perpetuate rule of sluts by sluts for sluts - in other words, a pornocracy.

A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, while a matriarchy is a society that condones female promiscuity.  The patriarchy is the lesser evil, believe me.

The patriarchy at least attempts to conserve the wisdom and wealth of previous generations, while the matriarchy is all about pissing it away on sex and shopping until we are so degraded and depraved we mate each other by sniffing each other's bottom and copulating in the park as and when the mood takes us.

These unthinking agents of the matriarchy don't even know they are doing it.   All they know is that they must continue not to criticise sluts, for to do so would be BLASPHEMY.

Once this culture is dominant, and believe me it is, you are living in a matriarchy, and the matriarchy means DEATH - the death of your civilisation.

The Catholic Church used to have the concept of fornication but no Catholic in the 21st century ever uses this term because they know most women in the West are sluts and most men in the West are MCSFs.

Only in Islam is there a prepardness to criticise sluts, but then the West hates Muslims because they threaten the supply of sluts to MCSFs and most people in the West are either sluts or MCSFs.

The threat of sluts to your society is a like one of those slow-growing cancers  below the waist.  Once it manifests itself it has already spread to another major organ.

Anyway, this is what the West is dying of.

If feminism is a cancer, then SSMs are cancer cells.

MCSFs = morally-compromised slut-fuckers

SSMs = spinster single mothers    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379