Sadly I can't be at tonight's event on @LiamByrneMP's facinating book but I'm speaking at a branch meeting in Exeter https://t.co/mjuKCn5S9Z pic.twitter.com/DfvhEJBl9F— (((Richard Angell))) (@RichardAngell) January 11, 2017
Preamble to tyranny is loss of facts and truth: pic.twitter.com/WECuzyrk0e— Ed Husain (@Ed_Husain) December 27, 2016
@DuncanKenyon1 @Amina_Lone @ProgressOnline What's the point of preaching to the converted when u r trying to address problem of terrorism?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
.@Amina_Lone women are used as a symbol by all sides in this debate. pic.twitter.com/wI6VngtppW— ProgressOnline (@ProgressOnline) January 11, 2017
But of course. Women become booty and sex slaves to be bought, sold, used and sometimes married. https://t.co/aUqh0LUGGe— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@dogfoxuk @ProgressOnline @Amina_Lone I thought this was gratuitously offensive to men who are the ones expected to do the fighting anyway.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
.@Amina_Lone 99% of extremist violence is conducted by men but we don't seem to acknowedge that issue.— ProgressOnline (@ProgressOnline) January 11, 2017
It is most Western men who invade/bomb Muslim countries, but so what? It was just a feminazi making another gratuitous and anti-male point. https://t.co/FJEyPAiaIv— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
.@Amina_Lone if we are going to challenge islamophobia, hate crime and racism we have to challenge misogyny and segregation in safe spaces.— ProgressOnline (@ProgressOnline) January 11, 2017
Looks like @Amina_Lone is using the terrorism threat to push her feminist agenda in Muslim communities. https://t.co/DOYFRvMI72— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Has it occurred to you that it is not just Muslim Radicals that don't like the feminazification of their society?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone It was in the end a disappointing discussion because you were all only interested in the *presentation* of your solutions.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone u were less interested in solving problem than taking a position on the problem that u thought was different/better than Tories'— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone There was really no difference between the conveyor belt theory and the anger theory. Social conservatives *are* angry.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@mcortonscott @Amina_Lone @ProgressOnline @LiamByrneMP @naushabahkhan Clash of civilisation over sexual liberation v social conservatism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Amina_Lone Liberalism and feminism is our state religion and there are now many dissenters. Feminism causes immigration.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Amina_Lone Britain needs to have a dominant culture that is acceptable to all and gay marriage ain't acceptable to all.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
.@Amina_Lone we have to step up or step out.— ProgressOnline (@ProgressOnline) January 11, 2017
Meaningless slogan. https://t.co/Wxy5HGQWu4— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
.@LiamByrneMP we need to make people confident in their self-idealism.— ProgressOnline (@ProgressOnline) January 11, 2017
What on earth does that mean? @LiamByrneMP https://t.co/ndsAEMdSL0— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@JoshuaGarfield @MariannaMasters @ProgressOnline Muslims are not happy and neither are Islamophobes. Feminists get so many things wrong.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@MariannaMasters @JoshuaGarfield @ProgressOnline Since Labour has more Muslims than any party, probably not a good idea to alienate them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@JoshuaGarfield @MariannaMasters @ProgressOnline Westerners hate Muslims for immigration, social policy and foreign policy reasons.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@MariannaMasters @JoshuaGarfield @ProgressOnline @UKLabour Immigration n migrant crisis caused by foreign policy the cause of Islamophobia.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
No Islamist would be seen dead at @ProgressOnline meeting discussing Islamism except ex-Islamist @Ed_Husain— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Such platitudinous meaninglessness. Anjem Choudary surely believes in the rule of [sharia] law.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Let's face facts: democracy did not last that long in Ancient Athens, did it? Not even 100 years. Makes you think— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain The majority of people are stupid, ergo the majority of voters of stupid.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain No one really believes in the rule of law and democracy, not even the neocons pushing it on the rest of the world— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Are the neocons upholding the rule of law and protecting/preserving democracy? They are delegitimising Trump.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain It doesn't matter that Trump won the election despite the odds, the neocons are not going to respect the result.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain US democracy is really about the deep state pulling the strings of the oligarchy. Policy is always the same: WAR.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Western foreign policy provokes terrorism, but mainstream Western politicians won't be acknowledging this.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Distinction between conveyor belt theory and @LiamByrneMP's anger theory is a distinction without a difference.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Terrorists ride on conveyor belt of grievance, knowing their govt won't acknowledge validity of their grievance.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Imagine n Islamist had attended @ProgressOnline n heard @Ed_Husain talk about theocratic fascism. He'd know ur not interested in negotiating— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain Purpose of the talk: to package your position as different n better than the Tories when it's actually the same.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain The @Conservatives are not planning to change their neocon foreign policy and neither is @UKLabour— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain The @Conservatives are not planning to abolish gay marriage and neither is @UKLabour. Not even @UKIIP plans this.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain The 5 essentials of sharia law are not being protected by PC Liberalism, are they?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain (1) Maintenance of life. This principle is offended against by death pathways in the NHS, euthanasia n abortion.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain (2) Protection of an individual's freedom of belief. Disagreeing with gay marriage puts you on the conveyor belt.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain (3) Maintaining the intellect. The operation of democracy and feminism means Idiocracy. https://t.co/0xPW9h5IZ8— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain (4) Preservation of honor and progeny. This clearly means patriarchy/marriage/family, which feminism undermines.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain (5) Protection of property. An Islamic rate of tax wd be a flat rate income tax of 20%. https://t.co/5iQ38VQDF0— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain @Amina_Lone @LiamByrneMP @naushabahkhan How to think about Islamic State https://t.co/ETmYG4MiDO— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain @Amina_Lone @LiamByrneMP @naushabahkhan Pankaj Mishra: Don't push democracy/feminism cos it clearly doesn't work.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain @Amina_Lone @LiamByrneMP @naushabahkhan Pankaj Mishra: Many Asian men already find feminism deeply upsetting.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain @Amina_Lone @LiamByrneMP @naushabahkhan Pankaj Mishra: If u push feminism down Asian throats more will join ISIS.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ProgressOnline @Ed_Husain @Amina_Lone @LiamByrneMP @naushabahkhan I do have a holistic solution to the problem of Muslim terrorism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@ntfem Hi, what is it?— Amina Lone (@Amina_Lone) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone I am almost afraid to say it because you are all going to squawk at me for being mad or an extremist, but it seems logical to me— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone It's not just Muslims who have a problem with current social policy, is it? You don't have to be Muslim to loathe gay marriage.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Anyone who is a social conservative would have a problem with current social policy and feel threatened by it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone The government has already said expressing hatred of gay marriage means we are already on the conveyor belt to radicalisation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone There is absolutely no need at all for LGBTs to have gay marriage to shag and shack up with each other, is there?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone LGBTs now have gay marriage when they already have civil partnership to make their commitment to each other public.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone My social policy would be to more socially conservative but I know that for you lot in Labour it is in fact UNTHINKABLE.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Labour will never have policies that actually support marriage and the family because it is just not your thing.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Even UKIP does not have policies that support marriage and the family because they are afraid of rocking the boat.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone The majority of voters of this country do not favour policies that support marriage/family and MPs are afraid of alienating them— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Everything about feminism undermines marriage and the feminazis are in control of the Labour Party. You must know this.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone What do the Corbyn and anti-Corbyn factions of the Labour Party have in common? They are under the thumb of the feminazis.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone You must remember what happened to poor old Maurice Glasman and what the feminazis did to him when he annoyed them in 2011.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone I can hear you wailing: "But we can't be social conservatives! This is Tory territory and we can't do that better than they do!"— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone The Tories don't do social conservatism either. It was a Tory Prime Minister that pushed through gay marriage with Labour help.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone The last time a senior Tory tried to do social conservatism was in 1974 - 43 years ago! https://t.co/92bZNx0eeZ— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone It could even be said that British social policies as well as foreign policy are the twin drivers of Muslim terrorism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone You don't have to be a Muslim radical to have noticed that nothing the government does supports marriage and the family.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone It is probably too radical - pun intended - for you to consider that it is government policy that provokes Muslim terrorism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Anyone who has read Bible/Koran with any attention will know God if He exists condemns sodomy. Will govt redact these verses?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone African Christians will be killed if C of E accepts gay marriage, says Justin Welby https://t.co/pCF0bUKRL8 HMG did it anyway.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone If this is not evidence of Western extremism, then what would be? https://t.co/Y3qmzU2D2E— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Islamists are just going by their book. It is the West who is always pushing the envelope. Ask again: who are the extremists?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone Yeah, so basically even if you didn't care about neocon foreign policy invading Muslim countries, you'd hate feminazification.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Amina_Lone It's not just Muslim men who hate the feminazification of Western society, Islamophobes hate it too.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd I think @Amina_Lone will ignore me the way @Ed_Husain and @LiamByrneMP ignored the question I asked.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd @Amina_Lone Well, to be fair, the nice @ProgressOnline chap next to me pointed out that what I said wasn't really a question.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd @Amina_Lone Question I should have asked: What are you going to do with the fact social conservatives don't agree with ur policies?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd @Amina_Lone Question I should have asked: What are you going to do with the fact Muslim terrorists don't agree with your policies?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd @Amina_Lone The unspoken answer was: We don't care what Muslim terrorists think n r only interested in PRETENDING we have a solution— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd @Amina_Lone What would have been the reaction of the hypothetical socially conservative Muslim terrorist after @ProgressOnline talk?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @nnnfdd @ProgressOnline We already know, don't we? He would have detonated his suicide vest.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@nnnfdd @Amina_Lone What do you do NEXT when you air your grievance then realise their validity will never ever be acknowledged? #terrorism— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone The religion of Britain is the religion of PC Liberalism which condones extramarital sex as a way of life.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone It is precisely the ideology of feminism that dictates that government must condone extramarital sex.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @Ed_Husain @LiamByrneMP @nnnfdd It was because they had no answer and their "solution" was to ignore the problem.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @Ed_Husain @LiamByrneMP @nnnfdd Progressive politics is about progressing towards sexual liberation,don't you know.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone Patriarchy is not a myth but a concept of society feminists hate and fear. Feminists are always talking about it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone I am surprised you have not noticed that most countries in the world base their government on liberal democracy.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone Oil-rich Muslim countries in the Middle East are allowed their own government only if they do what the US says.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @Ed_Husain @LiamByrneMP @nnnfdd I'm saying sexual morality is a very live political issue many dare not discuss.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @Ed_Husain @LiamByrneMP @nnnfdd Keith Joseph tried to discuss sexual morality in 1974 and look what happened to him— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @nnnfdd @ProgressOnline You must already know that the political establishment is willfully blind, deaf and dumb.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @Ed_Husain @LiamByrneMP @nnnfdd Trump is the only politician close to common sense and social conservatism.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@Dora_Chance @Amina_Lone @nnnfdd @ProgressOnline The problem is not that I am mad, but that HMG and the media are, which is even scarier.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Why does British democracy keep vomiting forth egregious mediocrities like @jeremycorbyn? Don't the British deserve better? https://t.co/cShMKzFhSe— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
The best question asked was by a Jewish lady, who speculated that Muslims become terrorists because they perceive something to be lacking. https://t.co/ntmRlp9ljw— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
What do Muslims who become terrorists perceive to be lacking in Western society? Policies that support 1) men 2) marriage 3) the family https://t.co/1CHxTDqggM— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
I well remember the Abu Qatada dinner I attended during Ramadan when on live video he told the diners: HMG does NOT support marriage/family. https://t.co/Zh4YpZguIH— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
There was something rather chilling about this statement: so obvious when pointed out yet so deliberately concealed and unacknowledged. https://t.co/aSVQVFMgnO— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Even after this has been pointed out to a Labour MP as senior as @LiamByrneMP, what's the betting HMG will continue drinking the Kool Aid? https://t.co/mndbEAiA3X— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
The globalists whom @LiamByrneMP used to work for do not want any nation to enjoy rational government. Nationalism is of course rational gvt https://t.co/ly0ihyHvbe— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
When the international order breaks down, the only thing we'd be left with is enlightened nationalism which globalists currently demonise. https://t.co/rhbei5AdjQ— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Watch https://t.co/v8lbEzGklT then compare and contrast Russia's and Austria's attitude towards nationalism as a policy. https://t.co/QVhtS30OR2— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
What is the modus operandi of globalists? They know liberal democracy keeps people and their government stupid and easily bribable. https://t.co/nAtgi7kSTb— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
How does globalism work? They just bribe key politicians in key positions ie Prime Minister, Foreign/Defence Secretary, Chancellor. Sorted. https://t.co/PcVeOARbzO— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
How do globalists keep people stupid? Demonise social conservatism and promote sexual liberation through feminism. https://t.co/0xPW9h5IZ8— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
https://t.co/WFs2j6LO5R Have you noticed how much the globalists hate Trump who dares to challenge feminists on abortion? https://t.co/0JhlKN0TLl— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Time to remind ourselves why we support Trump and what he is trying to do. https://t.co/NgvobpBCmj— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@DoctorEuge You would be labelled Far Right and demonised as such. Social conservatives are all Nazi Fascist racists, aren't they?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@DoctorEuge If you disagree with gay marriage you are just one stop away from terrorism. https://t.co/cYF6dBTFmd— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@DoctorEuge https://t.co/FK9fiWvhxl The hypocrisy of the counter-extremist— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Progressive politics is only about progressing towards sexual liberation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
The only countries that are not liberal democracies/vassal states of the US acting in their national interest are China, Iran and Russia.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Western man has for so long been enticed away from morality and reason that any attempt to put him right will result in anger and violence.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
What do China, Iran and Russia have in common? The desire to act in their own national interest and the ability to defy the globalists.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Globalists who control the media don't want nations run by an alpha male acting in the national interest, so they demonise nationalism. https://t.co/l3ZVt00FXO— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
The cause of Islamophobia is a combination of immigration policy and Western foreign policy. https://t.co/X5xpor2t23— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
Does "nuanced" mean "platitudinous" in this context? #terrorism https://t.co/7x0acSoqv4— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
The biggest threat the West faces is that of its politicians continuing to drink the Kool Aid of feminism, neoliberalism and neoconservatism https://t.co/HWIMZ5cgLd— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
How can you win hearts and minds when you won't even acknowledge that terrorists are people with a grievance whose validity you deny? https://t.co/DXRdP7VXeo— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
@RichardAngell The moral validity of Western foreign policy and feminism was never discussed. https://t.co/eCIMrN1FY9 …— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
The media is controlled by white middle class feminazis who despise white men and want to invite brown migrants in. https://t.co/SFWakMRvVu— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
White middle class feminazis are women who control spineless unprincipled men who don't care about the morality of Western foreign policy. https://t.co/sjrOU9XAup— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
What is the single greatest achievement of Western media? It has succeeded in demonising marriage, family values and common sense.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
So now we know: @ProgressOnline is funded by NEOCON CORPORATE INTERESTS. SHOCK HORROR! https://t.co/SnhEJ9ZUO2— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 12, 2017
White middle class feminazis in the media who control spineless unprincipled men don't care about the morality of Western foreign policy or social policy. Those who control our media are mostly feminists, gays, atheists and the opposite of people who support marriage and family values.
Having destroyed the masculinity of men of their own race, they now wish to invite men of other races to enter their country in order to destroy their masculinity too.
Under cover of terrorism legislation, the government can easily now censor the free exchange of ideas to demonise anyone who points out an obvious truth or uses logical arguments to press his case.
When people like Anjem Choudary easily win the argument, the government simply ceases to engage with them at all and then incarcerates them.
It is not just Muslim radicals who suffer this treatment, is it? Even now as you read this, plans are afoot to impeach Donald Trump, before he has even been inaugurated.
http://metro.co.uk/2017/01/12/donald-trump-may-get-impeached-within-a-year-if-you-believe-the-betting-odds-6377488/
Corporate media still has a purpose even if the rest of us already know they are the biggest manufacturers of fake news.
This is how it works: the media spin a narrative - any narrative at all, no matter how illogical, transparently false and immoral. Our politicians pretend to believe it and vote for it.
