Meta-analysis of the alt-right and the Christchurch mosque attacks

I am honoured and delighted that @churchofuntropy has shared her recipe for Bailey's Chocolate Cheese Cake with me! I had never heard of such a thing till she mentioned it,  Jenn's cake/poker/Adonis/sexual manners/Sex in the City story starts at 6:00.  https://t.co/LUU0iFiqTe https://t.co/099fgZ7c5I

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 24, 2019

58:00  Propertarianism, Periodic Tablism, Secular Koranism
What if David Beckham converted to Islam? I am in fact trying to sell Secular Koranism to the elites.  Is the government trying to get us to convert to Islam?

Jacinda Ardern would be treated as a sex offender under quran.com/24/2

Everyone - left, right and centre - wants a one party state

1:15:00   I don't know which Muslim country is most compliant with the laws of the Koran.
1:16:00   Jenn says ISIS.
1:18:00   I rail against people who don't follow their own rules.
1:20:00   Jenn's poison recipe
1:27:00   Religion and politics, morality and telling the truth, keeping one's promises
1:29:00   Our impulse to cheat and breaking our own rules
1:30:00   Checks and balances, the balance of power, the judiciary and their legal decisions are subject to an adversarial system, and also to appeal
1:33:00  We have a moral duty to use the best available system or use the least worst system.
1:34:00  The US constitution is being flouted daily.
1:34:30  The patriarchy must be restored for there to be leadership from above to do the right thing. Currently, the US is a matriarchy, which means even POTUS will be too afraid to criticise unmarried mothers. In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother.
1:35:00  The welfare state is  a sacred cow.
1:36:00  The statelemate and sclerosis of the West can only be overcome by a one party state.
1:37:00  Greg Johnson says he would be prepared to accept the bribe of universal basic income being offered by Andrew Yang.  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-state-of-alt-right.html
1:41:00  The intellectual elite
1:42:00  Trickle down knowledge
1:43:00  The natural elite
1:48:00  I invite Jenn to publish her manifesto.
1:49:00  The persecution of Falun Gong  https://www.dailynews.com/2014/07/14/why-china-fears-the-falun-gong/
1:59:00  Truth, Justice and Integrity
2:01:00  The pursuit of justice should replace the pursuit of happiness in the US constitution.
2:02:00  The supreme virtue is Wisdom.

2:57:00  DOOOOVID INDUCES IDENTITY CRISES ALL ROUND WITH HIS META-ANALYSIS OF THE ALT-RIGHT:


"I don't think Luke actually knows any white people in real life. If he does it would be fewer than five.


Frame Game  is [the alt-right's] imaginary Jewish friend. You actually don't have a Jewish friend.


Brundle is the alt-right's imaginary white friend.


Luke is a despised reporter generally despised by white people.


Church of Entropy is the lone white woman. There is a pack of hounds looking for a lone white woman ... "


3:03:00  Why Dooooovid preaches multiculturalism
Is esoteric Doooovidism the future?
Most of Doooovid's enemies are Jews who classify themselves as white.


3:04:00  "Claire is scared that Doooovid's going to get white people to turn against minorities and the Jews ..."


Philip Daniel in the chat:
​"Some of my fellow Jews just provide great fodder for antisemites and Judeophobes ... and yet they think they're doing a great service to the Jewish people through their efforts!"



I agree with Philip. I think I probably regard Doooovid and Luke through Jewish eyes, which is why I cringe at the hubris of Jewish triumphalism and supremacy Doooovid seems to be constantly provoking.


3:05:00  "Two camps in the Luke Community"


I don't think what matters is not so much what people feel but what solutions they support.


My view is that is that Brundle enjoys conflict and his videos are more about generating conflict and  getting people expressing hatred against each other as a form of entertainment rather than focusing on solutions. This is what Luke does too to attract more subscribers. They are more into bread and circuses AKA bloodsports rather than focused political debate. 


In this regard Doooovid and Kyle are hate figures wheeled out to generate hatred. I have described Doooovid as an Aunt Sally Jew guaranteed to attract people who want to hate-watch him and Brundle who is like a boxing promoter agrees with this description.

54:00

@Brundlefly14 Crying his heart out in 'I Got a YouTube Strike' because the Greenville baby liar got reported. Amusing. I'll make it clear: it was my team. And if you so much as step one toe out of line, we will take action accordingly and make you taste the ban hammer.

— Anti-Anglosphere (@antianglosphere) March 24, 2019

@Theocracy4all @RebDoooovid @Porcelain_Veins @VietnamAGoGo @yungharaambae @AndrewCordeaux @CultureBearer @KMGVictoria @lukeford @Gaius_Octavian_ @Babcast @adotson12 @rowlandkyles @faustian_spirit @MarkBrahmin @stendhal13 @cdotpratt1 @KnightOwl666 @BobThePunished @bobo_arrives

— Anti-Anglosphere (@antianglosphere) March 24, 2019

3:09:00  "Luke Ford and Brundle is basically trying to make money."


"Luke wants to marry a female version of Kyle."


"A female version of Kyle is not going to think like Brundle, she is going to think like Kyle."


3:10:00  Doooovid on those who want Luke to renege on his conversion and return to Christianity


Status-seeking Luke only converted to Judaism to gain a higher status so he is not going to return to despised Christianity and lose the protection of his Jewishness when accused of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism because of his association with the alt-right. If becoming Muslim offered him a higher status, he would convert to Islam, and I think he would not hesitate to do so if he knew this was guaranteed. Luke has actually very few fixed beliefs but, for as long as he wants to stream, he will remain Jewish or even convert to Islam if he thinks it would give him more subscribers, but he will never ever return to failed, despised and idolatrous Christianity because he has seen what happened to his father over obscure Christological debates that I doubt Luke even understands or cares about now.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMZ_ONO9JkM

3:11:00  and 3:16:00  The natural disposition of a Jew is to disagree with other Jews. That was the one sentence answer to that question I would have made  if I had been Doooovid giving a one sentence answer. Impossible, I know!


Should we conflate Jews with Judaism?


Should we conflate a set of correct directions with lost travellers who failed to follow them properly?


3:19:00  According to Doooovid's independent and scholarly interpretation of YouTube's Community Rules, "Patrick Little is more advocating policy whereas Brundle is more borderline advocating violence."


"Patrick Little is the model antisemite."


3:26:00  I am a barnacle on the ship of Jenn!


3:31:00  I confuse Brundle's stream that attracted the strike in which Doooovid did not appear with other streams in which Doooovid did appear where he did repeatedly say that violence was inevitable.


3:44:00  Durgadas and me
3:45:00  Christchurch mosque attacks
3:46:00  The compulsory hijab  https://www.sbs.com.au/news/new-zealanders-wear-headscarves-in-solidarity-with-mourning-muslim-community
3:48:00  BBC Woman's Hour on Jacinda Arderne's leadership qualities  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0003kms
3:49:00  Grandstanding at a tragedy
3:50:00  Erdogan received strong international criticism for playing the footage at campaign rallies and for saying Australians and New Zealanders would be sent home in coffins if they came to Turkey with ill-intent towards Islam. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-23/new-zealand-turkey-gallipoli-threats-put-aside/10932112
3:53:00  VIP treatment for Brenton Tarrant?
3:56:00  Do immigrants in New Zealand also complain about immigration?
3:57:00  The manifesto  https://www.europeanfreedom.com/2019/03/16/the-great-replacement-the-manifesto-of-brenton-tarrant-the-new-zealand-mosque-shooter/
3:59:00  Looking at the optics of the Day of Mourning after the massacre through the lens of the White Nationalist
4:03:00  Racism in New Zealand
4:06:00  If I were PM of NZ I would have a quite different kind of ceremony, perhaps, and consulted Muslims on the kind of ceremony they would prefer. I bet they would not have asked for the kind of spectacle that was on display.
4:07:00  It is now an offence in New Zealand to view the video online.
4:08:00  The optics of the Day of Mourning was more provocative than the video of the massacre, IMHO.
4:11:00  Local gun shops would sell semi-automatic weapons  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_New_Zealand
4:15:00  Dunedin  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramoana_massacre
4:18:00  Tarrant technically an immigrant.
4:19:00  The plebeian Brenton Tarrant
4:20:00  How Christchurch terrorist Brenton Tarrant went from smiling tot to white supremacist maniac who murdered 49 after trips to North Korea and Pakistan  https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/
Pakeeza Rasheed, a Muslim community leader, says she’s had her hijab ripped off, eggs thrown at her and has had someone spit in her face.
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/were-our-voices-not-enough-asks-refugee-experienced-racism-in-nz-prior-mosque-attacks?variant=tb_v_1

4:26:00  Crocodile tears
4:28:00  Gordon riots  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_Riots
4:29:00  The New Zealand character is more docile than the fiery Australian.
4:30:00  Singapore
4:31:00  The availability of social care in different Western countries and how the grass is always greener
4:33:00  The elephant in the room that is immigration
4:34:00  Why Tarrant did what he did
4:35:00  The undifferentiating racism of the typical racist.
4:37:00  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_badge
4:39:00  Feminine displays of masochism and racial humiliation
4:40:00  Badges displaying our gender fluidity
4:41:00  Yoga groups and  Yoga Movements in the West
4:45:00  Justin Trudeau
4:46:00  Jacinda Ardern's government is a coalition
4:47:00  New Zealand First and the National Party
4:48:00  Helen Clark  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Clark
4:49:00  UN job or Nobel Peace Prize for Jacinda Ardern?
4:50:00  The Cultural Appropriation of Yoga by White Western Women
https://nypost.com/2018/01/29/people-who-practice-yoga-contribute-to-white-supremacy-professor-claims/
5:07:00  Supersessionism  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism
5:09:00  "Free speech is now non-existent in the South Pacific unless you are a minority."
5:09:15  Pauline Hanson
5:14:00  Christchurch   http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/new-zealand-population/cities/

Greg Johnson, "Freedom of Speech"

Free speech is the right to speak truth to power, however much they hate it, as long as it is true.

It is not the non-whites who are stopping white men from organising against their matriarchy. The way forward is not to pass more legislation, but to repeal affirmative action legislation which is totalitarian thoughtcrime legislation.  It is easy to say it, so why don't white men just say that? Because this would upset the feminists and this means it would upset most women to whom white men seek sexual access. When white men finally acknowledge that what they fear most is losing sexual access to immoral women, they will finally realise that the problem is between their ears and their legs, not Jews/Muslims/non-whites.

State education and state schools in the West have abysmal standards because of the low quality of parenting and behaviour of each successive generation of school children, badly parented by their unmarried mothers. The only way of decisively dealing with unmarried motherhood is to shame sluts with quran.com/24/2. If you disagree, what other practical measure is there that might work, short of slut-shaming?

The left whose viewpoint is supported by immoral and stupid women indulge in their extremism because the men are too cucked to push back.

Even Jews come in four colours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_Israel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaifeng_Jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochin_Jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

If Judaism - the most powerful form of ethno-nationalism - cannot keep Jews looking white, what hope is there for the rest of us who reject the restrictions of Orthodox Judaism? This means only the divine civic nationalism of Islam is possible for gentiles.

What the white man is suffering from is not really white genocide but a catastrophic loss of status in his own lands because the rest of the world knows that the white man is lower in status than the unmarried mother in his matriarchy.

Using Secular Koranism to restore the patriarchy would make life for white men in the West much more bearable.

Muslim men in these debates on immigration often point out to me that in the UAE, the indigenous are actually outnumbered by their foreign workers, but the locals are, oh, so happy with this state of affairs because they are so tolerant and Muslim, blah blah blah.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expatriates_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates

But we know the real reason, don't we, Greg?  You wouldn't mind being outnumbered by any number of non-whites provided they showed you the proper degree of deference and did their jobs you hired them to do well.

There is no hope at all of getting anything done if you do not have the male solidarity that is necessary for the male cooperation you need to deal with your internal and external enemies, including conduct your proposed pogrom. There is no hope of dealing with your external enemies at all if the rest of the world perceives you to be cucked by your immoral and promiscuous women who are unmarried and bad mothers to your next generation because this means will just get stupider and weaker and easier to exploit and invade.

IQ Scores Are Falling in "Worrying" Reversal of 20th Century Intelligence Boom
https://www.sciencealert.com/iq-scores-falling-in-worrying-reversal-20th-century-intelligence-boom-flynn-effect-intelligence

I complain about Greg Johnson

Sorry about it ending rather abruptly when I was talking about white genocide, but I am sure you get the gist of it. I don't know why that keeps happening.

The bit you missed was me complaining that he says he is too busy to discuss Heidegger and authenticity with me.

UK needs migration because Britons are 'so bloody stupid', says peer who wrote Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/18/pro-eu-peer-lord-kerr-says-uk-needs-migration-because-britons-ar/?fbclid=IwAR2pyzp7uZlT7Lw8nMEj4nYvbo0MUR0E1bY6_9F190ZMKLOemcvXfZjP7vQ

Fathers are sleazy and mothers are lazy: What foreign au pairs REALLY think of British parents
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

https://quran.com/24/2

https://quran.com/2/275-285?translations=20

White Nationalism is a busted flush if White Nationalists refuse to discuss what religion to follow post-pogrom
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/white-nationalism-is-busted-flush-if.html

Greg Johnson and I talk about sex and his latest book

Is the degenerate feminist gentile weak and stupid because he is suffering from the double whammy of a failed religion and political system?

The question is why the gentile in his own land allows Jewish organisations to bring unwanted migrants into their country.  To be weak and stupid is to invite exploitation and abuse. There are plenty of gentile liberals encouraging Jews to be liberal. This is a matter to be resolved between gentiles themselves, surely? Obviously there will be white Western gentiles who want to co-opt non-white and Jewish minorities in their country to their political cause eg Sarah Jeong. The liberals being what they are would recruit far and wide amongst women, Jews and minorities while the Conservatives would be standoffish and exclusive with the predictable consequences of having a small narrow base of left-behind impoverished old angry technophobic white men regarded as bores even by others of their ilk from the lower strata of society with low standards of sexual morality and behaviour with addictions problems repellent to women of any race.

The kindest way to regard Jews and Judaism is this: think of liberal democracy as a toxic marinade and Judaism as a steak marinating in it with Jewish leaders now too morally poisoned by their moral environment to feel it to be their religious duty to remind the gentile when his laws fall dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.

2:29:00  "Isn't Christianity infinitely flexible in political terms? Christianity was a key part of Europeans conquering the world and having strong identities as Europeans,  Englishmen.Frenchmen or Germans and Christianity can also be an important part of the desire to contract Christendom and fill it with people who are hostile to Christianity. It is almost infinitely flexible in political terms."

The New Testament states nothing clearly, unlike the Koran, that is why you think it is infinitely flexible.

Christianity is now indistinguishable from Liberalism.

It is not quite so easy to distort the Koran once you control its interpretation.

Not for nothing has it been said that Christianity is the religion of religion and slaves, doubtless because of its ambiguity.

Ambiguity is a feminine stratagem, while men who make the rules like to state the rules clearly and men subject to those rules also prefer the rules to be stated clearly so that  they can order their lives around these rules.

Islam is the more masculine religion because it is supposed to be the directly revealed Word of God revealed by a successful leader of fighting men, while Christianity is necessarily confusing and ambiguous because it took Christianity 300 years to establish itself with several different accounts of the deed and speeches of an executed revolutionary anxious to give God what is God's and what is Caesar's to Caesar, whatever that meant, and whatever that took to get himself out of trouble with the Roman authorities.

No honest reading of the New Testament would give any reasonable lawyer the desire to base a theocracy on its stupid stories and vague extremist pronouncements. The Koran, on the other hand, naturally lends itself to legislation.

Only the most chauvinistic cultural Christian would continue to insist that co-opted and corrupted Christianity is superior even as he disbelieves the Trinity but refuses to read either the New Testament or the Koran because he already feels sufficiently "informed" by his hatred of Muslims.

Jews have been identified as a source of immigration encouraging leftism by the angry white non-Muslim gentile male. The kindest thing to think is that Jews who become liberal think gentiles want them to be liberal. Could this just be a terrible misunderstanding? If you stay with a quarrelling couple and take sides, expect to be physically removed when you supported the losing side. Women are liberal, men are Conservative. Jews have been known to adopt feminine stratagems of victimhood as a means of acquiring status in their host countries while adopting overwhelming force when it comes to dealing with unwanted residents in Israel. Is this the fault of Jews if the gentile is so easily exploited and afraid of his women who don't care about the concerns of gentile men, these women who keep voting for pro-immigration parties, for leftist parties who want immigrants to vote for them by giving them passports?  All political parties in the West have the strategy of soliciting the female vote because the female vote is the key to getting voted into office, followed by the most powerful minority of all, the Jews. This is predictably resented. The solution is so obvious: become a one party state and disenfranchise non-taxpayers.

The solution as I see it is to separate the good Jews from the bad Jews. There is nothing liberal or sexually liberated about Judaism. It also an abuse of hospitality - whether you be Jew or gentile - to be generous to people your hosts would consider unwanted intruders at your host's expense.

If you lose even when you win by playing by the rules and there is no longer any rule of law, then violence seems the logical next move. Trump won because he showed concern on immigration and even now the HIAS are trying to obstruct him when he is only trying to fulfill his compaign promises. They are doubtless also plotting his impeachment and assassination.

 If we are of the view that things will have to get worse before they get better, then we will have to regard things getting worse as a sign of things getting better.

If we are of the view that things will have to get worse before they get better, then we will have to regard things getting worse as a sign of things getting better.

Even now Jews refuse to consider the grievances of gentiles. Anyone presuming to inform them of their grievances are told they are antisemites who should fuck off.

And then I was unfriended.

If we are not guilty of any act of violence, there is no moral reason why we should not say "We told you so and look what happened because you wouldn't listen. People will only play by the rules if they think they have a reasonable chance of winning if they do so, but you have rigged everything and the rule of law no longer operates. Do not be surprised then if some people become angry enough to take the law into their own hands when they already know that the legal and political system is kaput and rigged against them. If you already know people are so upset that they voted Trump because they have had enough of immigration, why are you obstructing him at every move and trying to import ever greater numbers of immigrants?"

You must have a really shit political system to let your minorities do this to you without any hope of fixing it.  Why not admit it is shit?

Your religion must be kaput if it none of your leaders except Trump is trying to represent the interests of the beta male. Why not admit it is kaput? Why not take a more Jewish view of suffering and learn from it, rather than continue being women in denial?  https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/suffering

To repeat: your religion and political system must be utter fucking shite if your minorities and elites can do this to you without any prospect of the problem being fixed.

Is it because Jews are so very clever, or is it because people who identify as Christian do actually have shit for brains?

Hey, maybe if you admitted that Christianity is kaput and democracy should be taken out with the trash, something might just change?

Otherwise, the white gentile male will be like his women: passively complaining waiting for his knight in shining armour.

"The Jews did it to us." Why did you let them do it? "Because we have have no moral agency, no leaders and no chain of command that will trigger any focused action to solve the problem because our religion and political system are no longer fit for purpose."

43:00  Jews get more left-wing as they get older? I know an elderly woman who voted to remain because EUrocrap represented her glorious youth.

45:00 Degenerate sex crap will always provoke a wave of self-loathing so intense it will spill over into violence. I seem to remember a book by Anthony Parsons who was describing the same thing happening in Iran before the Revolution.

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/04/21/books/doomed-shah.html

Essentially (and in my view correctly), he argues that the Shah never understood how deeply resented were the changes he had wrought in trying to move Iran from feudalism to high technology in a generation, how much the young nationalists and the Shiite leaders hated what they saw as the political, cultural and economic colonization of their country by the West, mainly by the United States. I never heard it expressed better than by a young revolutionary of my acquaintance, who said that the trouble with the Shah and his circle was, ''They can tell you all about Chartres or the Colosseum, but they know nothing about the mosques of Isfahan.''

Bernard Shaw:

"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as healthy man of his bones. But if you break a nation's nationality, it will think of nothing else but getting it set again." 

Islam and immigration

Muslims take the brunt of Westerners' understandable hatred of immigration. Islamophobes have their narrative to justify their desire to expel Muslims unscrupulously using superficial and dishonest arguments on the credulous and resentful in a bid to persuade them to support the hoped for anti-Muslim pogrom when the time comes.

The Narrative of the Islamophobe is as follows:

"Muslims are terrorists and sex predators because they are Muslim. Their prophet also married a nine year old girl and had sex with her, which makes him a paedophile. Muslims hero-worship a paedo prophet and are paedophiles and terrorists. So kick them out."

It is interesting that they refuse to accept that their rotten culture of officially and legally condoning underage sex and statutory rape could have anything to do with tempting Pakistani-heritage criminal gangs of sex traffickers to engage in child prostitution.

Their response would probably be along the lines of "Even if they weren't pimps in child prostitution, we would still want to expel them because we don't need or want them here."

There is not much going on in the former industrial towns of Northern England anyway, so I imagine respect and money must somehow be acquired either through legal means or otherwise.

What is abundantly clear is that for those who are interested in buying or selling underage sex, men from Muslim backgrounds have the male solidarity to make them more effective sex predators because they operate in gangs prepared to share information and resources with each other while the Islamophobes fight each other like ferrets in a sack and stab each other in the back in their anti-immigration political parties.

I am sure I am not wrong in supposing that white Islamophobes who complain about Muslim sex predators would only shrug their shoulders if they were told that the illegitimate adolescent females of their race abandoned by their immoral mothers into uncaring care homes fall victim to men of their own race. What they find so viscerally enraging is the fact that females of their race are being sexually exploited by men of another race and religion and there appears to be nothing they can do about it. They can do nothing about it because the matriarchy that they live under does not care and has no solutions while they themselves are too frightened to challenge the matriarchy.

They are afraid to challenge their matriarchy because this would mean questioning feminism and questioning feminism would attract accusations of misogyny lowering their status thereby damaging their sexual access to immoral women likely to become the mothers of illegitimate offspring who will abandon them into care homes and allow them to become the next generation of child sexual abuse victims.

Because these men are atheists, they will not be prepared to make the sacrifice that abiding by the rules of marriage requires of them: the policy of slut-shaming by making fornication a sexual offence attracting the punishment of 100 lashes administered in a public place to reinforce the prohibition as prescribed by 24:2 of the Koran. quran.com/24/2

Does Islam stop Muslims from committing sex crimes?

From 2:14:00

Instead of trying to explain how and why so many Muslims came to be convicted of sexual offences against underage white schoolgirls, my short answer should have been:

"Does Christianity stop Christians from committing sex crimes?"

If it is claimed that Christianity is better at restraining Christians from committing sexual offences than Islam is at restraining Muslims from committing sexual offences, then we need to know the percentage of sex offenders who are Christian and Muslim.

Are these crime statistics available, I wondered.

No, is the answer.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/criminaloffencesreligionandethnicity

Who is a Christian?

I define a Christian as someone who believes or claims to believe that Christ is the co-equal of the eternal and supreme Abrahamic God.

If there are hardly any convicted sex offenders who are Christian, does this mean Christianity is better than Islam at restraining its adherents from sex crimes?  Or is it because there are hardly any Christians around?

If there are hardly any Christians around in a supposedly Christian country, what does it say about the success of Christianity?

How are Christians counted? Surely the C of E should have a list of people who have been confirmed in the faith?

Are you Christian if you consider yourself Christian as https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/13/anglican-church-congregation-numbers-have-stabilised/ suggests?

The report says: "The proportion of self-describing Anglicans in Britain has more than halved, from 40 per cent in 1983, down to 17 per cent in 2015.

"That said, the past three years are worth highlighting. If talk of even a modest Anglican revival would be premature, one certainly can speak of a newfound stability."

Professor Bullivant added that the release of Dawkins' book had stopped a lot of latent Anglicans from describing themselves as Christian.

"That book was really aimed at those people who said they were Anglican but didn't really believe in God," he said.

"So a lot of them stopped ticking Anglican on the forms and started to tick atheist instead."

Are you Christian if you say you are? Certainly, if you are prepared to say that you believe that Christ is the co-equal of the eternal and supreme Abrahamic God. 

How many people who call themselves Christian even know of this requirement?

How many people who identify with Christianity for cultural and family reasons would be angered and disgusted by the requirement to believe in an absurdity when made aware of it? (People who come from a Christian background I have spoken to are not even aware that they are supposed to believe in it.)

The other problem of definition is Islam.

Is it fair to expect Islam to work on Muslims not living in an Islamic society with Islamic laws? Is it fair to expect a car to run if it has no source of energy?

A system of morality is only as good as its enforcement, and the law is the only means of enforcing any rule.

If the rules are not enforced, then they become merely optional. Not fornicating becomes merely optional.

How many of victims of the sex predators in Rochdale and Rotherham were the daughters of married mothers still living with their husband when they were abused?

Indigenous white sex predators tend to work alone. Muslim sex predators tend to work together sharing information and resources making them more effective sex predators.

If there are underage schoolgirls to be sexually abused, Islamphobes would doubtless prefer it that they are sexually abused by white indigenous non-Muslim sex predators.

Understandably, white men consider it an outrage that white girls in their own country had become the victims of immigrant Muslim sex predators operating under the noses of the police for so long. I doubt that these Islamophobes would lose any sleep over white indigenous sex predators preying on the illegitimate and abandoned daughters of unmarried white mothers. It is only to be expected that females abandoned by their unmarried mothers would fall prey to sex predators, after all.

It is the racial and religious element that they find so outrageous, understandably, with the added implication that white men have lost control.

The question no Islamophobe will ask is "Where were the fathers of these abused schoolgirls?"

There is no point having rules if you don't enforce. Islam is theocracy the way Christianity is the Trinity. Those Muslim sex predators were not living in a theocracy where fornicatresses would be punished. In fact, they live in a society where fornication has been normalised and underage sex condoned since 1985.

This is why our laws should be in harmony with our chosen moral system.

What is our current chosen moral system? It is EU Directives promoting open borders, the Equality Act 2010 and other laws promoting sexual liberation from the rules of marriage that has overthrown the patriarchy and established the matriarchy.

Underage sex can be aided and abetted by doctors, perfectly legally, provided the easy to satisfy conditions at https://www.nspcc.org.uk/preventing-abuse/child-protection-system/legal-definition-child-rights-law/gillick-competency-fraser-guidelines/ are satisfied.

If the law had forbidden fornication as quran.com/24/2 does then the victims of these sex predators would not have been conceived, born, abandoned and then subsequently abused by sex predators or gone into child prostitution.

To sum up, no one just told a bunch of rules is going to obey them unless they live in a community that enforced them.

A moral system that is not supported by the law is toothless.

Our moral system is liberalism which these days means no more than sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and parenting.

Child prostitution in the post-industrial cities of the north has been a fact of life for decades.

https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/09627259708553131.pdf

A better question would have been "Does any law stop crime?"

The correct answer must be "Not entirely."

Do laws prevent crime?

Does the survival of Western civilisation depend on defeating Muslims?

Why doesn't it matter that Mohammed was a paedophile?

Secular Koranism is the paradoxical solution for Islamophobes because it would deal with the feminazis

.@YouGov Would you happen to know whether the majority of Muslims voted to leave or remain?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

On the one hand we have https://t.co/WEh8KEY1fU which says "Muslims were clearly in the remain camp, with 69% choosing this option and 31% in favour of leaving the EU."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

On the other hand we have "In 2015 General Elections, there were 96 Muslim PPCs, 22 from Labour, 19 from Conservatives, 24 from Liberal Democrats, 10 from UKIP, 7 from Green Party" at https://t.co/iUDUNZlBJP

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

I thought it was very interesting Muslims have more representation as Prospective Parliamentary Candidates of UKIP than the Green Party. Muslims seem to feel that they have more in common with an anti-immigration party than with a pro-immigration environmentalist party.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Muslim vote could decide 25% of seats: Victory in a quarter of British constituencies will be decided by Islamic votershttps://t.co/OltutlgYVq Looks like these Muslims voted the right way as far as @HJS_Org is concerned.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Muslims are concerned about immigration and so are Jews are concerned about antisemitic Muslim voters who outnumber them in the political parties. Ditto gentile non-Muslim Tory and Labour voters. But our shitty system of demented democracy carries on with immigration anyway.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Big business wants immigration because they know the bastard locals are shitty employees no sane employer would want to hire if they could have the choice of hiring available willing immigrant labour. Why doesn't the government fix social and educational problems? Cuz democracy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Do you know what happened when a High Tory Jew - Baron Joseph, no less - criticised the morals of never married single mothers and said they would destroy the human stock of Britain? He paid for it with his career and saw a woman take what everyone thought would be his job.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened'

Tory peer's warning about discouraging middle class 'breeding' echoes speech which killed off leadership hopes of father of Thatcherismhttps://t.co/H1p1I8IuvT

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Another Jew, this time in Labour, tried to challenge feminism and halt immigration, but he too paid for it in spades when the feminazis destroyed his career too.  https://t.co/VY6DMyHwxp

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Rabbi Sacks dropped subtle hints about protecting children with marriage and helped Sir Paul Coleridge set up @MarriageF but of course he was ignored too. https://t.co/nCD6v5etK8 Even now, no one in the establishment dares to discuss Secular Koranism.  https://t.co/7kXcwYUj1N

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

To the gentile Islamophobic antisemite and xenophobe, I have this to say to you: it is not Jews or Muslims who are the problem, nor even your women. It is your own cowardice at challenging your totally out of control feminazis who now control all the major institutions of state.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

What is the sex of the Prime Minister, Commission of the Metropolitan Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions, Chairman of the Bar, Chief Executive of the Howard League in matriarchal Britain? There are even female governors of male prisons. They have delighted us enough. https://t.co/M9T1B9TxYY

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 24, 2018

What explains this cowardice of the Islamophobic antisemitic racist gentile of the alt-right? I think it is something to do with accepting the bribe of fornication for half a century. This has caused moral and intellectual corruption and rotted his courage, spirit and manhood.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

The older ones hope to live to see the Super Pogrom before they pop their clogs, the younger ones dream of fighting and killing their enemies. But how will you live after your pogrom, I ask. They don't think it will be their problem and have no intention of answering the question

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

These so-called nationalists are no better than the nihilists they complain about. They only care about living to see their enemies kicked out and killed. Beyond that they want to know nothing and care nothing, because they expect to be dead. The next generation can go to hell.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

So-called nationalists who have no intention of discussing Secular Koranism are not interested in restoring the patriarchy. They know they are unequal/unwilling to make the required sacrifices a patriarchy requires, neatly demonstrating that patriarchy has always been hard on men

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

The whole point of the Abrahamic faiths is to establish and maintain the patriarchy. Ignore this fact at your peril. Judaism is for Jews only, and Christianity is kaput, but, fear not, Islam is waiting in the wings. https://t.co/3T7b0d0mJU

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

Why not Hinduism or Buddhism, I hear people ask. Because these religions are alien to your traditions and they are not as good as Islam which protects gentiles from Jews because it would ban usury. There is a reason why Jews are forbidden from practising usury on each other.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) August 10, 2018

How I propose to help Orthodox Jews so concerned about immigration they join the alt-right but suffer socially and professionally

Doctor Says He's Sorry for Posts on White Nationalist Sites https://t.co/51YsI2Y88e

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 29, 2018

The doctor in questions is an Orthodox Jew. Clearly, uncontrolled immigration discombobulates and upsets Jews too who are confused about whether they are white and if so whether the alt-right would accept them. They are like immigrants concerned and disturbed about immigration. https://t.co/MBRi6gNwVU

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 30, 2018

In my case, I don't think I am white but "identify as white" in the sense that I am deeply aware of how and why the tyranny of the totalitarian and dysgenic Feminist State would anger them as men. I don't need to be white to use my imagination.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 30, 2018

The most important thing to bear in mind is that immigration is now such a problem that *Orthodox Jews in the West* are having an identity crisis! They want to complain about immigration so much they join white nationalist groups. In extemis, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 30, 2018

This is not really a Jew and gentile problem, but a Patriarchy v Feminism problem. Framed in these terms, the Culture War is certainly winnable.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 30, 2018

To restore the patriarchy, shame sluts. To shame sluts, use https://t.co/jtJmkTuWSa  Sluts are the soldiers of feminism by bribing susceptible men with fornication they cannot refuse.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 30, 2018

Once it is generally agreed that sluts must be shamed for the good of society, feminism would become an army without soldiers. Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) July 30, 2018

http://www.friendsofislam.org/Islam-for-Atheists-td8.html

F Schmidt, Jew:

If you are reading this, I assume that you are an atheist who recognizes that modern culture is a disaster and that Islam is a morally promising alternative.  Your problem is that you cannot accept Muslim beliefs.  I will address this problem.

First I will address atheism.  Atheism means believing that there is no god.  The problem with this is that most atheists don't have a coherent definition of god, and to take a position on the existence of something that you haven't properly defined is simply silly.  The main attribute of god that atheists object to is that is god is supernatural.  Yet pantheists define a god that is not supernatural.  I believe that the Old Testament idea of God is not supernatural either.  The definitions of "god" found in dictionaries reflects the Christian nature of our society, not the historical use of the concept of god.  A more reasonable definition of god is a global force or set of forces that cannot be described scientifically.  For example the forces that shape human history can be considered god if you believe that history is shaped by a consistent set of forces.  Because people are unsatisfied with concepts that aren't described and explained, god has historically been described through personification and explained as supernatural.  But these are not necessary attributes of god.  The key point of the idea of god is that just because one cannot describe a force mathematically or explain the mechanism of the force doesn't mean that the force doesn't exist.  Forces that cannot be described or explained (yet) are still real and must be respected.  This is the concept of god.  The concept of monotheism is that there is one consistent set of forces that applies across time and space.  This consistent set of forces we call the one God.  This concept makes science possible.  It also makes it possible to study history to determine which moral systems worked.  If you accept what I have written so far, then you are no longer an atheist.  You can now honestly say that you believe in God, but that your view of God differs from the Muslim view.  This is a big step forward, big enough to allow you to participate in a mosque without fundamental conflict.

The next step is to honestly consider Islam.  It is only fair and reasonable for you to consider Islam with an open mind.  You should attend mosque regularly.  There will certainly be people there who will explain to you why they think you should accept Islam.  Consider what they say.  And read the Quran.  As you gain understanding of Islam, it will become clear to you whether or not this is something that you can believe.  If you can accept Islam, then you are done, no need to read more.  But if you can't accept Islam, continue reading.

Even if you can't accept Islam, you should still support Islam because it is the only major moral force in the world today.  As a believer in monotheism, you are still closely aligned with Islam.  To fit in, avoid undermining the beliefs of Muslims with pointless debate.  Instead, focus on areas where you agree.  I also recommend that you do daily prayer at home.  The purpose of prayer is not to benefit God, but to benefit yourself by reminding yourself of the importance of religion.  I do one 4-repetition prayer in the Muslim form each day.  Doing daily prayer will prevent you from feeling like a hypocrite in the mosque, and will make prayer in the mosque more natural.

If you find yourself in this position, as a non-Muslim attending mosque and supporting Islam, then I hope you participate in this forum.  There aren't many of us and we can give each other advice.

But the main thing is to take the first 2 steps above.  Reject atheism and start attending mosque.  Do not be intimidated by Islam, and don't settle for being part of degenerate modern culture. 

Millennial Woes: "The British establishment is radicalising itself against the native population."

https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/05/why-i-dont-support-tommy-robinson/

Was a publicity stunt worth the risk of setting a gang of child rapists free? That’s a breathtakingly selfish decision. I don’t see any way of avoiding the conclusion that #TommyRobinson is morally reckless and probably a bit stupid. #TommyRobinsonArresthttps://t.co/IHXH64TSMl

— Counter-Currents (@NewRightAmerica) May 28, 2018

" ... white advocates around the world need to guard our credibility, not squander it in what is essentially a white chimp-out based on the false premise that Tommy Robinson is a martyr for freedom of speech and the pursuit of justice for the victims of Muslim pedophile gangs." https://t.co/z2jj76lnKm

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 28, 2018

Millennial Woes:

[contradicting himself] I do think people should be assumed innocent till proven guilty but in this case we are talking about a men who possibly rape children ... accusations of rape, abducting children, threats to kill and drugging children. Is it right that these men are allowed to walk free and the public are not allowed to know who is possibly guilty of doing these sorts of crimes. It does pose a huge risk to the British public. 

Tommy Robinson talks about how he is offended daily  by niqabs, drug-dealers, child rapists etc but no one cares whether we are offended by these things and by we presumably he means native white British people.  

Then very interestingly, he talks about a group of parents who have started patrolling the city in the north of England to stop the grooming gangs because they have concluded that they can't rely on the police to stop the grooming gangs, and he says he is going to visit city that night - Friday night - to talk to them about it, to interview them.  

The establishment would not want news of that reaching the general public because it is the beginnings of self-reliance, street action and possibly vigilantism. They fear the implications of that. The implication is white solidarity against Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. The problem for the establishment and the powers that be is that once the whites have collectivised at that local level, it will be much harder for the establishment to maintain the status quo. 

Millennial Woes suggests that it was only when the Sikhs decided to defend their girls with violence did the police see fit to to intervene.

There has been this tacit informal code of silence - of omerta - on parts of the British media about politically inconvenient events and also politically inconvenient truths. They just decide that's off the agenda, and that's been going on for the last ten years. It is very obvious that there is this judicious editing going on. It is one of the reasons why the alternative media exists at all. The fact that is this news agenda which is British but also international - and you say it is transnational has become increasingly obvious - definitely since the turn of the millennium. Media outlets act in concert deciding what they are going to report and how they are going to report it. It could be entirely instinctual. It might not be a coordinated network, it might be that they agree - it's in the air, that's the meme, that's how we are going to report it. What we have now is a formal codification of the news agenda on the part of the government just saying "That man, that story did not happen" and that's a very sinister development. It's scary, because if the British judiciary and by extension the British government can order the media not to report this story, then they could do it with any story. This gagging order on reporting on Tommy Robinson's imprisonment is a good thing, because it makes explicit what a lot of people have known subconsciously for years: the non-reporting of events and the slanted reporting of events. We've just got used to it. We've come to accept it and even expect it. This is what they do and how they behave.  The media is incredibly biased and they are able to lie to us and say black is white. 

That there is no parental authority is the greater scandal, more than unsupervised schoolgirls falling victim to sex predators of this race or that religion. Sex predators will be sex predators, but why won't white British parents parent their adolescent daughters properly?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 28, 2018

Britain today is a country where the following ten things happen:

1. Publishing a joke video in which your dog does a Nazi salute will transform you into a convicted criminal, as happened to Count Dankula.

1. Advocating for the survival of the white race will get you branded a racist, Far Right, extremist, hater, Neo-Nazi etc and you will be barred from entering Britain, as happened to Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer and Martin Selner, simply because you like your race and want it to survive. Can you imagine that happening to someone of any other race?

1. Intending to interview Tommy Robinson will get you barred from entering Britain, as happened to Brittany Pettibone. 

1. Criticising Islam even with satire will get you barred from entering Britain, as happened to Lauren Southern. 

1. Voicing anti-immigration, anti-multiculturalism, anti-Islam or anti-diversity opinions could get you a 6 year jail sentence, if the Sentencing Council have their way.  That's the direction the establishment is heading in, and it's pretty hardcore. 

1. Singing songs about the Holocaust will transform you into a convicted and jailed criminal, as happened to Alison Chabloz. 

1. Singing songs about Jewish power will transform you into a convicted criminal after Jewish groups have used their power to get you convicted. 

1. Giving a speech about Jewish power, including the unique power to have their own police force will get you jailed for a year, after Jewish groups have used their power to get you jailed. 

1. Disobeying a court order about something trivial will get your thrown in jail for 13 months within a matter of hours. 

1. The media can be gagged from reporting to the public that you have been imprisoned, and anyone on social media who does so, could be arrested. 

All of the above (with the exception of No 5) have happened in the last few months in Britain. So the British government has a plan for Britain. The plan and also their determination to stick to and implement that plan are becoming increasingly clear. The plan involves the future of Britain and the future of British society, and that involves what you might call the legacy population of Britain, namely the native British people. The government's plan means the transformation of British society and thereby the dispossession of the British people. What they want to transform Britain to is not clear: it could be a coffee-coloured Islamic theocracy, or it could be a coffee-coloured secular police state, or maybe they oscillated between the two goals, unsure which of them is more feasible or desirable, but either way their plan requires the measures we are seeing now.  

Any expression of dissent from this political paradigm is now treated as a crime, and this includes causing offence, even if only perceived, not intended, to non-white groups in Britain with whom the government intends to transform Britain - culturally, racially, genetically. It also includes any causing of offence to Jews as a group. You can make your own mind up as to why the British government is so eager to placate Jews as a group. At this stage, I am not even sure it even matters what the original reason for that was because we are heading into chaos. We are heading towards what you might call anarcho-tyranny, but beyond that, decades of chaos and bloodshed. But in the meantime, we aren't supposed to even talk about the issues which will animate the decades of bloodshed and chaos. We are not even supposed to talk about it. That's why they want to put people in jail for six years if they do so. We are just supposed to pretend that everything is fine and that we're all on board with the government's plan for the country, for us, and our grandchildren. How delicately the fetters have been placed under our lips over the last few decades. But now suddenly we feel their weight upon us - silencing us, suffocating us.  

The British establishment is radicalising itself against the native population.   

The government of Britain does not care about the native people of Britain. It has put in measures to make sure that they are mixed out of recognition and bred out of dominance in their own homeland. 

It has also put in place measures to ensure that they daren't complain about this. So make no mistake: this is not just cultural, it's not just religious: it is racial, genetic, permanent.  

The government of Britain is trying to destroy the native people of Britain, and it's doing everything that it can to stop them talking about it.  

I will leave it up to you to decide whether the civic nationalists have a solution for this situation, whether the Conservatives, Jordan Peterson-style individualists or progressives have a solution for this. Or, whether these groups are just delusional, weak wastes of your time. 

Alexander Mercouris talks about the Deep State in Britain:

"Theresa May is a very weak Prime Minister."

Alex Christoforou suggests that Tommy Robinson's jail sentence could be in effect a death sentence due to the fact that many prisoners are Muslim who would wish to do him harm or even kill him.  

Gangs, Girls and Grooming: The Truth by JULIE BINDEL

"The fact that these particular gangs are made up of Pakistani men is significant but not in the way racists would have us believe," says one child protection expert who asked not to be named. "While the BNP would have us believe that abusing white girls is an endemic part of these men's culture — which it absolutely is not — the truth is that these men are aware that the police do not want to be accused of racism in today's climate."

In 2004, Channel 4 withdrew Edge of the City, its controversial documentary made by Annie Hall that depicted parents trying to stop groups of young Asian men grooming white girls as young as 11 for sex. It had been seized on by the BNP as a party political broadcast.

Colin Cramphorn, the then Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, joined groups such as Unite against Fascism in calling for the documentary to be withdrawn. Channel 4 complied, saying that the issue was not censorship but timing because of the proximity with the local and European elections. But many argued at the time that the delay in transmission had strengthened the case of the BNP. 

After the film was withdrawn, one of the mothers sent Annie Hall a text message: "It's a real shame when votes come before young girls' lives."

For many white girls growing up in fairly traditional communities, the unfamiliarity of boys and men from different ethnic backgrounds can be exciting and attractive. 

"The man I thought was my boyfriend used to dress really well and always smelt nice," says Sophie, "and I thought it were dead nice the way he talked, and even his manners seemed better than boys I were used to."

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." https://t.co/1aoe8rmGSR via @BrainyQuote

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 28, 2018

UKIP was founded in 1991. The British people have been working towards Brexit peacefully for a quarter of a century, and were finally given an EU referendum in 2016, which they won. But even when you play by their rules and win, the stinking matriarchy will still make sure you lose. 

After pointing out that it is obviously the intention of the liberal elite to deprive the British people of their hard-won Brexit, Stefan Molyneux says:

If a people are not roused to action by the systematic torture, rape and in many ways and reproductive destruction - it comes across to me as an act of war to - to destroy young women to that degree where they may not be able to have children, not be able to pair bond or get married in any productive or efficient way, that is almost a genetic war against the domestic population. If that wasn't enough for a people to do something ... if that's not enough for change, then I really don't know what is.  

Is Molyneux referring to Muslims or the disease of the mind that is feminism?

The brain drain of the white race

Pity Western Man, now so terrified of being falsely and maliciously accused of a historic sexual offence and so trigger-happy that he will shoot anyone in front of him, even one who is attempting to defend him.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Those who are not afraid to challenge the matriarchy are intellectual mediocrities, low status under-educated men who condemn themselves the moment they open their mouths with their rabid racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia, bad grammar, regional accent and beta male persona.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Unmarriageable atheist bachelors AKA MGTOW are the other half of the problem of matriarchy. Unmarriageable men means increased bastardy which means more tolerance of bastardy and fornicating sluts meaning more and more of the same until an Islamic takeover, I suppose.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In a matriarchy, all men are beta males subject to the whims of the fornicating slut and unmarried mother. The instantly alpha male would be a man of requisite status and charisma prepared to challenge and defeat it. No one man with anything to lose at all will come forward.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

The fact that no man with anything to lose will emerge to challenge the matriarchy is because such a man would already know he cannot rely on the loyalty of the beta males below, who are not only low status, but men of infamous for their disloyalty and inability to follow orders.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Proletarian white males complaining about immigration are mostly fatherless low-skilled socially retarded with some behavioural problem usually caused by drug/drink-dependency. No one in nationalism would even dare deny this. No marriage, no family values, no religion, no morals.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

No morals, no male solidarity, no co-operation possible to deal with the eternal enemies of society and civilisation: sluts and socialists who have a symbiotic relationship. This means there is only a degenerate culture no sane and moral immigrant would want to integrate into.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

And so this, in a nutshell, is why the white man's status in his own land has become progressively lower (pun intended) over the decades. The immigrant male knows white men are too afraid to challenge their own women and too divided to protest effectively.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Because their own women reject them, they turn gay to get cheap sex from each other. Soon they will grow old and die without issue and descendants and wonder what happened to their lives and their country, blaming Jews, Muslims and foreigners as they breathe their last.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

You don't know what you've got till it's gone. Can you imagine such men restoring the patriarchy or restoring the patriarchy with such low status degenerate unmarriageable leaderless men whom no one wants to lead? They are indeed being warehoused for extinction.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

In the meantime, what are white women to do? The marriageable of them will try to marry marriageable men, and they will not be men of their own race whom they already despise: feminised and impoverished.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

What about marriageable white men already aware of the moral devastation wreaked by feminism? They'll reject white women. I recently heard of Asian Aryanism, a term used for white nationalists who reject white women and take up with Oriental women because of their sensible views.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

To secure their own reproductive rights within their own lifetimes, white men and women feel they have to mate with other races in order to have legitimate progeny and bring them up with a spouse who believes in family values. This is the deadly reality of racial degeneracy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

Are you surprised that "mainstream" alt-right YouTubers such as @MillennialWoes and @MarkACollett won't discuss any of this with me? I have the solution but it is what their subscribers cannot bear to hear, so they promulgate race war or urge some form of displacement activity.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I hope to demonstrate that the principles of nationalism are the same for every race and nation: patriarchy supported by marriage using a moral system whose laws support marriage. This can only mean Islam if you are a gentile in the West, because Christianity is kaput.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) April 24, 2018

I have been saying for years that sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and the only protection against this is the practice of slut-shaming that is required by any religion that promotes patriarchal moral values. These would be the five world religions, but as you know, all religions can be subverted once they ignore their own rules and people either don't notice or don't care.

The sexually-liberated atheist is more prone to doing this than a Jew or a Muslim because Jews and Muslims are more likely to know about the prohibition against premarital sex than the atheist, even if they do not agree with it.

The trouble with nationalists is that they are atheist antisemites and Islamophobes who would rather die than even be seen to be investigating the religion of those they hate and fear with any show of objective impartiality.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage. Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage. Without the patriarchy, not enough good strong men will be produced to defend the national interest. If Western men were mostly Christian husbands and fathers of legitimate offspring, they wouldn't and needn't put up with the matriarchy for even a minute.

Without the family and a functioning religion, men are atomised and competing against each other for the sexual favours of immoral women, incapable of co-operating with each other to deal with their internal enemies: sluts and socialists.

Without patriarchy there is no hierarchy and therefore no accountability.

A matriarchy is basically buck-passing politicians who will blame other buck-passing politicians where the apparent leader is really not in control of anything and cannot rely on the loyalty of beta males to support him. This makes him cowardly, hesitant and cautious and also means nothing much will be done in Trump's term of office.

Without patriarchy, no one in a senior political position will stick his neck out to defend the beta males below. Enoch Powell and Keith Joseph tried to point out the obvious, but had their careers destroyed.

Because courage and truth is not rewarded, no more politicians will speak it on your behalves.

Not only is pointing out the obvious unrewarded, it will get you ignored even by the people who are supposed to be on your side who cannot bear to accept the truth either.

The problem with atheism is that the atheist can only think in terms of his own life and does not care what happens after he is dead, especially if he has no biological investment in the next generation.

Most white nationalists are atheist unmarriageable bachelors which means they are easily intimidated and bribed.

Without religion, there is no possibility of enjoying the inter-generational co-operation that Jews and Muslims enjoy which means each generation of nationalists has to more or less reinvent the wheel.

Often, I feel that nationalists of the previous generation would actually hate to see the younger generation succeed where they have failed.

As far as the younger generation are concerned, they are now so atomised that they cannot form a political party or even discuss anything other than what they imagine their YouTube subscribers want to hear.

And this is why none of them will talk to me. It is abuse of power really, but they don't see anything wrong with that either.

If you really are a political activist, you owe it to your cause to seek the truth and operate on logic, guided by your principles. This is the very least that is required.

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.

Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.

Intellectual corruption leads to the inability to form logical conclusions based on indisputable facts and solve political problems guided by moral principles. Only those from a religious background practising family values would have internalised the categorical imperative to have principles and follow them. The illegitimate, singly parented and the badly schooled will find this almost impossible to do, however patient you are with him. Believe me, I have tried.

The degenerate who has difficulty understanding the nature and purpose of principles will have greater difficulty applying them if they their morality is non-existent. Most of them will have difficulty even recognising a situation when the exercise of principle is required, because they are accustomed to responding instinctively and thoughtlessly to the promptings of their baser appetites. If sex is offered, they will take it, even if they have already said they are not looking for a relationship and would even agree with you that immoral women who are also bad parents of illegitimate offspring cause the social problems of immigration they are always complaining about.

Such degenerates are only left with denial, apathy and the stated intention to leave the country if it all gets too much to bear.