Translate

Showing posts with label Gaby Hinsliff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gaby Hinsliff. Show all posts

Friday, 8 January 2016

Justin Webb interviewing two women from Germany about Cologne attacks on New Year's Day 2016

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06twjtk

8:43
Chancellor Angela Merkel has said Germany must have a "fundamental" debate about how to integrate new migrants after a wave of sexual assaults on New Year’s Eve which have been blamed on migrants. Speaking in the programme is journalist and activist Kubra Gumusay and editor-in-chief of Bild Zeitung - Germany’s most read newspaper - Tanit Koch.

Kubra Gamusay is an oxymoronic Muslim Feminist, which Justin Webb omitted to mention. You can hear her witter on about Muslim feminism at http://www.islamandfeminism.org/kuumlbra-guumlmuuml351ay.html

Bild Zeitung is the German equivalent of The Sun, which Webb also omitted to mention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild

Despite being often recognised as a right-wing publication, in January 2015 Bild began a petition against PEGIDA, an anti-Islamisation protest group.



JW:

Germany is having an anguished debate about the attacks around New Year on women walking in and around the railway station in Cologne. The Right accuse the establishment of covering up the crimes of Muslim immigrants, including some from Syria and North Africa. The establishment is reacting in pretty pained fashion. Angela Merkel speaking yesterday in Berlin saying deportation should be considered for foreigners who commit crimes. Let's talk to Kubra Gumasay who is a journalist and activist in Hamburg and to Tanit Koch who is Editor In Chief of Bild Zeitung which is Germany's most-read newspaper. Good morning to you both. 

The wittering women chorus:

Good morning, Justin! 

JW:

Kubra, first of all: does everyone accept now this was mishandled?

KG:

Well certainly yes especially since after the events it was found out that many women who have been sexually assaulted had struggled and reporting especially the way the victims have been dealt with. There were quite a few problems with the event in specific but in general what we have right now is a problem in the way we talk about these topics. Sexism is an issue in Germany not only within the immigrant community but also within the immigrant communities. We are now having a debate that focuses on the other, the immigrant, the refugee as the barbarians who are coming into our country to basically assault our women - those sexist men - and we are now experiencing a very racist turn of the debate. 

JW:

Tanit Koch, would that racist turn be avoided if the truth was told earlier about incidents like this?

TK:

Absolutely. I am not actually sure there is a "racist turn". There is some issues that haven't been addressed during the last years or decades which should have been addressed before are now in the focus. I absolutely think that the - forgive the language - cock-up by the police and police communication in Cologne certainly has not helped at all but actually worsened the matter of people distrusting the establishment, politicians and the media. 

What I would have said if asked this question:

"Of course not. Germany is now experiencing an unprecedented flood of immigration that is pouring oil on the fire of pre-existing racial tensions caused by uncontrolled immigration and Islamophobia general to liberal democracies towards Islamic State. The foreigners and immigrants the Germans most particularly hate and fear are Muslim migrants, and it is this group that is reported to have molested German women. Xenophobia includes hatred and fear of foreigners, and the most foreign of foreigners are foreigners of another race, especially if their religion has values you already know to be opposed to yours. Islamic State are Muslim and Islamic State jihadis come from Syria and North Africa. The men reported to have molested German women during the New Year were men of that religion coming from precisely these places. The hatred and fear is both racial and religious as well as deeply and undeniably visceral."    

JW:

And of course it wasn't just the police, was it, the state broadcasters as well have had to apologise because they didn't report the facts even though they knew them.

TK:

Well, they have apologised. I think you shouldn't over-estimate that one incident because that was the [inaudible] of news at seven o'clock and reported the incidents later on that day so they apologise for not doing main news which definitely was a mistake and is absolutely feeding into the trust issue raised by radical right wing movements and parties.

[Of course Koch doesn't want the German public to make too  much of the media not broadcasting the truth, being Editor in Chief of the Bild and therefore part of the media herself!]

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/08/cologne-attacks-hard-questions-new-years-eve?CMP=fb_gu

Gaby Hinsliff:

Many Germans are asking why politicians, police and broadcasters seem so reluctant to discuss what happened under cover of the crowds (the state broadcaster EZF apologised for not covering the attacks until Tuesday), and whether it’s because the attackers are widely described as looking Arab or north African. Which is why, of course, liberals like me are reluctant to talk about it.

The parallels between German politicians’ discomfort over Cologne and Britain’s response to predominantly Asian gangs grooming girls in Rotherham for sexual exploitation aren’t exact, but there are lessons to be learned.

The first is that pushing victims under the carpet for the sake of cohesion is dangerous. When allegations about older Asian men preying on white girls in northern cities initially surfaced, well over a decade ago, it was the BNP that first took up the cudgels. Unfortunately, that meant journalists and politicians instinctively shied away, wary of giving the BNP publicity.

By trying not to give succour to racists, the risk is that we end up miserably self-censoring.


You really can't trust these liberal cunts, who have absolutely no fucking idea about journalistic integrity, can you? But at least Gaby Hinsliff is coming clean now. Most white middle class women think foreign males are interesting and more worthy of attention than men of their own race and emasculated white men allow them to indulge this preference. They don't even know they are doing it. It is as natural to them as picking up a baby and cooing at it.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/harriet-and-hoods.html


What I would have said if asked this question:

"Germans have indeed lost faith in their government and their media, which they now know to be rotten with Political Correctness. It was after all their Chancellor Angela Merkel who invited the migrants to Germany in the first place, only to withdraw her invitation a week later, like an indecisive and neurotic woman who enjoys playing with a man's feelings, just because he allows her to. The suspicion that only pro-migrant reports were allowed by the media was not particular to Germany, for the BBC, CNN and other Western liberal media are just as guilty. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html The best thing pro-migrant politicians such as Merkel and Reker can do for themselves and their people is to resign, and let those more in touch with the understandable anxieties of the German people take their places. Germany should close its borders, leave the EU and lie down quietly in a dark room and reflect on its future. Denial is a feminine vice and more denial at this stage would only enrage German public opinion. That public life is filled with ranks of vacillating and incompetent women who constantly pull their punches and witter on about their nonsense such as Muslim Feminism and Germany integrating yet more aliens will just infuriate an already irritated and anxious German public. All female journalists guilty of a pro-migrant stance should also resign."
Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males by Simon Sheppard

JW:

Kubra Gumasha, do you accept that there is a real risk to not just women's rights actually but other rights as well that our accepted and seen as part of secular modern European society that are not necessarily respected by some of those who come in and that has to be said plainly?


KW:

No, I certainly agree that people who come into Germany should who fled to Germany and seek rescue here are not people who went through integration process who have basically declared that they will comply with all of the values here. That certainly hasn't happened so obviously I don't expect that we won't have any issues with that. I mean that is a struggle that we will be something we have to deal with that in the future and I do believe that we will actually be able to manage that, it's just the way we handle it and at this point Germany has missed in the past years the point we should have talked about who we are as a country, who do we mean when we say "we". We have not yet managed to be a society that is inclusive, that speaks of "we" and then includes people who have not been born in Germany but certainly do feel German, who have a German passport, speak the language so what we need right now in Germany is a debate on who we are and who we want to be.

What I would have said if asked this question:

"What has to be said plainly is that no nation that already has an immigrant problem should be accepting any more of these migrants. Those already here can be used as slave labour or have the option of being returned to where they came if they object to being used as slave labour. The perception that these migrant swarms who molest European women are somehow privileged over European men will create a simmering resentment that could be the source of riots and, perhaps, revolution."

JW:

Is that the debate you are going to get now, Tanit Koch?

TW:

Actually, I think the debate we are going to have is what we expect of people coming into the country that have been treated - as you yourself the BBC have reported - with great hospitality that those people have to understand what our way of life is not just our views but our way of life. I am bit frustrated that in particular Cologne had these appalling incidents because I have lived there myself and Cologne is the party city of Germany which has a history and prides itself on its great tolerance and openness towards people coming into that city from all over the world so the debate is going to be not just how to reassure ourselves of what we are and who we are but also to tackle certain issues that have come into the country because of course when you haven't grown up in Germany you cannot possibly be used to our way of life but people who do not abide with the law simply have to learn that this cannot be accepted. 
INTERVIEW ENDS.

What I would have said if asked this question:

"The topics of debate should be as follows:

1) How Europeans managed to get themselves into this situation in the first place. (It was feminism causing the European birth rate to decline that caused the labour shortage making immigrant labour so attractive to governments of senescent and shrinking populations afraid of alienating the female vote by telling women to have more babies earlier and bring them up properly as stay at home wives. The illegitimate offspring of single mothers entering the educational system would inevitably lower standards of education and behaviour making the next generation of indigenous labour less attractive but immigrant labour more attractive as employees to German businesses. A generous welfare state is also a disincentive to work.) The Pill, the Sexual Revolution and abortions- all may share some blame for our dependency on immigration.

2) Where these migrant/refugee swarms came from. They are of course from the countries that NATO so blithely bombed at the behest of the Americans. Even as Hitler plotted to expel the Jews from Germany, he had in mind somewhere to send them - Madagascar. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan 
Incompetent and short-sighted European governments bombing Syria never even considered for a moment where those escaping their bombing would go - to Europe, as it turned out. The Cost Germany Is Paying For Washington’s Wars

3) If we were a proper dictatorship, our benign dictator would have made the women have enough legitimate children younger and made the proles work, without giving a stuff about their so-called human rights. If this had happened, there would be no need for immigrant labour. Anti-immigration parties should tell their supporters exactly what they have to do if they want to solve the problem: abolish the welfare state, marry earlier, have more children and abolish all anti-discrimination pro-feminist legislation."

Do you just get the feeling that my suggestions will not be acknowledged, let alone discussed in mainstream media?

Do you think ISIS would just let anyone come into their country, molest their women and then let an idiotic Muslim woman who thinks she is a feminist witter on about Islamic State's national identity not being sufficiently inclusive to the kuffar, eh, eh, eh?


Friday, 12 September 2014

‘Fat shaming’ doesn’t encourage weight loss, says female who conducted research and female who funded research

Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women:

"The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning. Dissimulation is thus inborn in her and consequently to be found in the stupid woman almost as often as in the clever one. To make use of it at every opportunity is as natural to her as it is for an animal to employ its means of defence whenever it is attacked, and when she does so she feels that to some extent she is only exercising her rights. A completely truthful woman who does not practice dissimulation is perhaps an impossibility, which is why women see through the dissimulation of others so easily it is inadvisable to attempt it with them. – But this fundamental defect which I have said they possess, together with all that is associated with it, gives rise to falsity, unfaithfulness, treachery, ingratitude, etc. Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all."


The Koran is more liberal than Schopenhauer and definite allows women to be witnesses to loan agreements, however.  http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/nora/html/2-282.html



http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/11/fat-shaming-slim-sanctimonious-cause-obesity-crisis?CMP=twt_gu
Discrimination against overweight and obese people does not help them to lose weight, finds new UCL research funded by Cancer Research UK.


https://twitter.com/nickdmorris/status/510427034204774400 has the exchange between Nick Morris and Gaby Hinsliff

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0914/110914-Fat-shaming-does-not-encourage-weight-loss

Do please note that this research has been conducted by two women who are very probably feminists.

Feminists believe in privileging women simply for being women and are infamous for their belief that while women should be in charge of everything, they can never be held responsible for anything. That would be the prerogative of the whore, by the way: power without responsibility.

It seems women are so utterly devoid of freewill and responsibility that they are no longer even responsible for what they put into their mouths.

Why do men put up with this rubbish? Because feminism has turned them into a shadow of their former selves after bribing them with cheap slut sex for decades.


Dr Sarah Jackson:
“There is no justification for discriminating against people because of their weight,” says lead author Dr Sarah Jackson (UCL Epidemiology & Public Health). “Our results show that weight discrimination does not encourage weight loss, and suggest that it may even exacerbate weight gain.

Professor Jane Wardle:

Senior author Professor Jane Wardle, director of the Cancer Research UK Health Behaviour Centre at UCL, says: “Our study clearly shows that weight discrimination is part of the obesity problem and not the solution. Weight bias has been documented not only among the general public but also among health professionals; and many obese patients report being treated disrespectfully by doctors because of their weight. Everyone, including doctors, should stop blaming and shaming people for their weight and offer support, and where appropriate, treatment.”

 I think everyone should take this research with a huge pinch of salt, eat less and exercise more. 

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Orwell Prize Longlist Announcement today - no prizes for guessing who won't be on it


Dear all,

Thank you for your entry to the 2012 Orwell Prize. We received a record number of submissions; 264 books, 140 journalists and 226 bloggers submitted work. Our judges have been busy reading since the New Year and they’re finally nearing a decision.

The longlists will be announced next Wednesday 28th March at midday. At this time you shall receive an email notifying you of our decision.

The entrants make the Prize what it is and we do hope that you will continue to enact Orwell’s vision of turning ‘political writing into an art’.

If you should have any questions you can contact me on katriona.lewis@mediastandardstrust.org. I have taken over administration from Gavin Freeguard and look forward to getting to know you all.
Good luck and best wishes,

Katriona Lewis | Administrator, The Orwell Prize
0207 229 5722 | katriona.lewis@mediastandardstrust.org | 5/7 Vernon Yard | Portobello Road | London W11 2DX

'What I have most wanted to do... is to make political writing into an art' | George Orwellwww.theorwellprize.co.uk | twitter.com/TheOrwellPrize


Last year it was a rather more public event as can be seen at http://theorwellprize.co.uk/events/orwell-prize-longlist-2011-announcement-and-debate/ compared to this secret event that no one is invited to this year as can be seen at
http://theorwellprize.co.uk/events/orwell-prize-longlist-2012-announcement/

Third video from the top 9:48 at 6:34, David Allen Green says

"Yes, there is a perception that the Orwell Prize has a leftist approach ...."

then lots of canting prating shit about Orwell wanting to "correct injustice" (but only as defined by leftists like him).   Graeme Archer the civilly partnered homosexual who writes for Conservative Home (that nest of so-called Conservatives who wish to conserve the liberal status quo and whose leader supports "gay marriage", no less) won.  Dan Hannan who is not quite gay enough because he has a wife and children did not.

Last year they at least went through the motions of appearing to be impartial by having, I was going to say, two judges who were not Labour Party supporters.

I then checked http://theorwellprize.co.uk/the-orwell-prize/how-to-enter/entries-2011/blog-prize-2011/ and it came back to me that one of them was David Allen Green who actually admitted in his speech that the Orwell Prize was Left Liberal.  The other was Gaby Hinsliff, former political editor of The Guardian on Sunday.

Well, I guess they were never going to like my stuff.

Radical Right bloggers are automatically and easily excluded, because if you have not heard of some unknown blogger you are not going to ring and ask indignantly "Why hasn't Claire Khaw made the longlist?"

This  year, however, you can.

Notice that all the winners of the blogging prizes have been Left Liberal.   Last year's winner was Graeme Archer who writes for Conservative Home admittedly, but then he is known to be gay and in a civil  partnership.

If the only way of winning the prize if you are associated with the Conservative Party is to be gay then I will say I am a lesbian.  I have been hinting as much on Twitter and Facebook.  I am sure I said a few suggestive things to Suzanne Moore who is one of the judges this year when we were still Facebook friends, before she unfriended me.

I seem to remember offering to go round to hers to kiss better some marks on her neck that looked like love bites when she was asking her Facebook friends to look at those marks.

Later, I noticed that Nyta Mann (who works for the BBC) who was also her Facebook friend and formerly my friend were bad mouthing me.   Nyta Mann might recollect a few failed attempts on my part to seduce her.   So there.   I am not just making up my sexual orientation to win the Orwell Prize.

http://twitter.com/#!/nytamann

http://www.facebook.com/nytam

I also allowed the lesbian journalist Julie Bindel to kiss me once or twice and responded appropriately ie by kissing her back.

http://www.facebook.com/julie.bindel

http://twitter.com/#!/bindelj

Last year Suzanne Moore blocked me from following her on Twitter and started a campaign to tell others to do the same.

The other judge this year is Hopi Sen, who once worked for the  Labour Party.

No prizes for guessing who is NOT getting on the longlist again this year, even if my stuff is the most cutting-edge and radical form of political blogging, that demonstrates the art of my political writing.

So there you are, folks, there you are.

If you care for free speech and the integrity of the Orwell Prize, you now know who to ring to make your complaints.   The Orwell Prize is not owned by the Liberal Left.  If it is, it should not be.

Do not let them dominate the limits of political discourse, which are now very very narrow indeed.

Yesterday, a young white man was jailed for 56 days for sending offensive tweets about the black footballer Fabrice Muamba.   Has Muamba become God and has a law been passed forbidding blasphemy against our new British God Muamba?   If so, nobody told me or Liam Stacey.

I also want to say how sorry I am that Gavin Freeguard is no longer the administrator, but he has moved on to better things and is now political adviser to Harriet Harman.  Even when he must  have been privately appalled at my views, he was always  perfectly polite and charming to me.

You can read my submissions for this year's Orwell Prize for blogging at
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/my-submission-for-2012-orwell-prize-for.html

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...