13 themes constituting the main body of Political Correctness by Thilo Sarrazin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thilo_Sarrazin

From 25:26 he speaks.

From 34:34 he lists his 13 Points.

1. Inequality is bad, equality is good. 
2. The secondary virtues like industriousness, punctuality have no particular value. Competition is morally objectionable except in sports because it promotes inequality. 
3. The rich should feel guilty except those who have earned their money as athletes or pop stars.
4. Different conditions of life has nothing to do with people's choices, but with the circumstances they are in. 
5. All cultures are of equal rank and value, especially the ways and values of the Christian Occidental West. Western industrialised countries should not enjoy precedence. Those who think differently are provincial and xenophobic. 
6. Islam is a religion of peace. Those who see any problems with immigration from Islamic countries are guilty of Islamophobia. This is is nearly as bad as antisemitism. 
7. Western industrialised nations carry the main responsibility for poverty and backwardness and other problems in other parties of the world. 
8. Men and women have no natural differences except for the physical signs of their sex. 
9. Human abilities depend mainly on obtaining an education. Inherited differences play hardly any role. 
10. There are no differences between people and races, except for the physical appearance. 
11. A nation-state is an outdated model. National identity and peculiarities have no particular value. The national element as such is rather bad. It is at any rate not worth preserving.
12. All people in the world do not only have equal rights, they are in fact equal. They should all be eligible for the benefits of the German welfare state. 
13. Children are an entirely private affair. Immigration takes care of the labour market and of any other demographic problems.

Nick Griffin tells Claire Khaw to fuck off

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkXcVA2nYqk#t=28

What Nick Griffin's said in Germany:

1. Civic nationalist parties like UKIP and Front Nationale who are doing well are condemned by him for being "phony nationalists".  
2. Even if they were elected they would be overwhelmed by left-wing rioting and fall within the year.
3. Nuremberg is not a German city now but a Turkish city.  
4. Russia is the only European country left in the West.  The rest of the West are full of immigrants and Muslims.
5. The EU elite are conspiring to start WW3.  
6. Russia and Germany must form a nationalist alliance.  

He said nothing about the Equality Act 2010 and nothing about abolishing No Fault Divorce, as I had urged him to.

MY SUGGESTED BNP STRATEGY FOR GE 2015

1. If UKIP won't repeal the Equality Act 2010 then the BNP should. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people
2. If UKIP won't abolish no fault divorce then the BNP should.
3. If UKIP won't be the party of small business then the BNP should be.
4. If UKIP won't denounce feminism then the BNP should.  
5. If UKIP won't oppose gay marriage then BNP should. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/UK/UKIP-will-not-oppose-gay-marriage-Nigel-Farage/articleshow/32313979.cms
6. Declare the BNP to be officially and exclusively civic nationalist.
7. Annul Claire Khaw's expulsion
8. Appoint Claire Khaw as BNP Director of Communications
9. Become bigger than UKIP
10. Absorb UKIP
11. Rival LibDems
12. Become bigger than LibDems
13. Hold the balance of power after GE 2015

Niche marketing must be the way forward for the BNP.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niche_market

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/what-bnp-can-do-now-that-ukip-has.html

Below are my messages to him:

CK to NG  19/3/14  2126

Your only chance of retaining any credibility with the public is to make the party officially and exclusively civic nationalist.  What are the problems you anticipate and what objections do you have to simply filling up the policy vacuum Farage leaves?  If he won’t repeal the Equality Act you will.  If he won’t abolish gay marriage you will.  Whatever he won't do you take up the slack?  What do you think?

CK to NG  19/3/14  2132

Please tell me your concerns and objections to repeal Equality Act and abolish no fault divorce if you find them objectionable.  I may already have the solution.  

CK to NG  20/3/14  0810

A belated but Damascene conversion to civic nationalism by you would attract media attention.  People would leave the party but you are just getting rid of the dross.

CK to NG  20/3/14  0819

Once the dross has left the good people will join.  Instead of pretending you aren’t racist you can say why repealing the Equality Act and abolishing no fault divorce would be in the national interest.

I am afraid what follows was a rather dismissive response from the Chairman:

NG to CK  20/3/14  0852 

Do stop wasting your time and mine.  Mass immigration has been a deliberate genocide plan against white people from the very beginning.  Civic nationalists are not only cowards but collaborators with the biggest crime in human history.  A crank who poses with assault rifle and a swastika has not the slightest right to lecture the BNP.  http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/which-type-of-mangina-are-you So, to put it politely and for the avoidance of doubt: Fuck off!

I received no further response to my subsequent messages:

CK to NG  20/3/14  0901

That photo was for the purpose of making the point that it is logically impossible for me to be a Nazi and that I am as much a Nazi as I would be a policeman if I had been photographed outside a police station with a policeman’s helmet on my head.  It is also for making the point that the British don’t care much for logic.  I have never said anything antisemitic unlike you or tried to plead the 5^th Amendment on Question Time re Holocaust Denial.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222441/Question-Time-panellist-launches-extraordinary-attack-BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin.html Instead, I have consistently asked: what number is Holocaust Denial?

CK to NG  20/3/14  0904

“Mass immigration has been a deliberate genocide plan against white people from the very beginning.”  By whom?

CK to NG  20/3/14  0906

“Civic nationalists are not only cowards but collaborators with the biggest crime in human history.”  I am a civic nationalist.  How have I been cowardly?

CK to NG  20/3/14  0913 That photo gives me notoriety and links me to nationalism.  You are probably aware that a conventional career path in politics is closed to me and that I must somehow make myself known as I am not a member of any party. 

CK to NG  20/3/14  0927

I would have thought that a nationalist would want to repeal the Equality Act.  I know John Tyndall would have supported my proposal and that the BNP wanted to repeal the Sex Discrimination Act in the 1990s.  You are not helping your people by failing to make nationalism an attractive, moral and noble ideology.  Instead, nationalism is now associated with CHAVs in Islamophobic demos.  Even UKIP have gone further than you in displays of Islamophobia eg screening of Fitna in the House of Lords http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/mar/05/geert-wilders-house-of-lords, Gerard Batten’s proposal to make Muslims promise not to commit terrorism. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/04/ukip-mep-gerard-batten-muslims-sign-charter-rejecting-violence

CK to NG  20/3/14  0933

What have you got against proposing the abolition of no fault divorce which undermines the institution of marriage?  It is the desecration of this institution that has caused racial and national degeneracy, has it not? http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html  [85% of Jamaican mothers SSMs.  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts] You do know that most British babies are illegitimate, don’t you? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html Most children of British mothers born out of wedlock  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517 'The whites have become black' says David Starkey

CK to NG  20/3/14  0943

Your trouble is that you lower your morals to match those of your core supporters.  Perhaps my trouble is that I try to raise the morals of those I hope will support me.  I can tell you how to do better and you owe it to yourself and your cause to understand my ideas before you reject them.  If you tell me your practical and philosophical objections to my proposals then I can propose solutions which you would be free to reject or implement.  WHY won’t you propose repealing/abolishing EA/NFD?

CK to NG  20/3/14  1001

I was in The Guardian against last Friday.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/13/hugh-muir-diary-pickles-audit-commission I can probably attract more publicity than you can these days.  Who else in nationalism has been described by The Guardian as “philosopher activist”? http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/may/29/hugh-muir-diary-waterboarding-bbc  I am also legally-trained.  I am probably your last hope before you face electoral meltdown next year.  Now tell me why you won’t propose to do away with Equality Act and no-fault divorce.  If it is because you are afraid of a mass resignation of the Advisory Council I have just the solution, but you have to act fast.  

http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/content/contact is where you can send him messages saying you are a Eurosceptic who would vote BNP instead of UKIP but only if he does what I have suggested above and at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/what-bnp-can-do-now-that-ukip-has.html

Why I would be pleased to see the statue of Churchill in Parliament Square pulled down

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/jun/04/boris-johnson-book-winston-churchill

London Mayor Boris Johnson, who said that the Woolwich atrocity is nothing to do with either Islam or UK foreign policy and who is apparently believed by the gullible, those in denial and the cowardly, is now writing a book in praise of Churchill.

Here are some questions for Boris and his fellow Churchill-lovers.

1. Why did Britain enter WW1?
2. Was Belgian neutrality worth the sacrifice of so many British lives?
3. What document provided for Belgian neutrality?
4. Are you aware of the contents of the Treaty of London 1839?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_London_(1839)
5. Can you discern from its contents what it was that was so important about Belgian neutrality to Britain that made its leaders sacrifice so much over it to so little effect?
6. Were you aware that the German Ambassador in London was aghast at the British for going to war over what they called "a scrap of paper"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_London_(1839)#.22Scrap_of_paper.22
7. Are you aware that the British went to war in 1914 over a document signed 78 years before that?
8. Was Britain the most militaristic nation in Europe?  (A militaristic nation goes to war at the drop of a hat and over scraps of paper.  It is understandable that Germany would go to the aid of Austria if it was being threatened by Russia, if it had recently agreed to do so.  It is understandable that the Russians who are Slavs would go to the aid of the Serbs who are also Slavs if they were being threatened by their Austrian overlords, but what the fuck had Belgian neutrality to do with the British??)
9. Could it be said that British foreign policy at the time before WW1 and WW2 consisted of being nasty to the Germans for the sake of being nasty to the Germans?
10. Could it be said that the British policy of being nasty to the Germans for the sake of being nasty to the Germans ended up in the disintegration of the British empire?
11. Why couldn't Germany have Poland when Britain had its world empire since Germany had completely missed out in the scramble for Africa?
12. Did you know that Poland had a Saxon ie German king as recently as the 1600s?
13. Did you know that Germany regarded Poland as its backyard in the same way that Britain regards Ireland as its backyard?
14. Could it be said that WW2 was a continuation of WW1?
15. But for WW2, would Britain have lost its world empire?
16. If WW2 was a continuation of WW1, and Britain lost its world empire as a result of WW2, could it be said that Britain lost its empire over "a scrap of paper"?
17. Was Hitler's greatest mistake his belief that the British would be reasonable about Poland (which was outside their sphere of influence anyway) when they had already gone to war over the scrap of paper that was Belgian neutrality?
18. How rational do you think British foreign policy is?
19. How rational do you think British foreign policy has been in the last hundred years or so?
20. Did you know that Hitler liked children, was an animal-lover, a vegetarian and was kind to his servants, while Churchill was a drunkard, a depressive and was rude to his servants?
21. While Hitler was an infamous antisemite, did you know that Churchill thought "Keep England White" was a good slogan?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Later_life_of_Winston_Churchill#Return_to_power
22. If you have gone to the trouble of acquiring an empire, shouldn't you at least try to hang on to it for as long as you can?
23. Could it be said that Churchill gambled away the empire the British, acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears, in a roll of dice?  (What is war but a speculative gamble?)
24. Are the British fools or knaves for overlooking the enormity of Churchill's folly?
25. Could British foreign policy be better conducted by Claire Khaw who takes a Palmerstonian view of British interests?  (Palmerston would have taken a dim view of the Special Relationship.  "Therefore I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.")
26. Is it time for the British to stop being the poodle of America and instead become the Pekingese of the Chinese, which would mean shutting up about Tibet?
27. Do you think British MPs ever discuss foreign policy in an honest or reasoned way?
28. Are you are of any serious and detailed discussion taking place as regards UK foreign policy?
29. If you were a Muslim terrorist committing terrorist atrocities to make the British re-examine their foreign policy, do you think you have done enough?
30. Do you think the Germans are on the whole quite decent forbearing people considering what they have had to put up with from Hitler and the British?
31. While Churchill was not the one who in fact declared war on Germany, do you think he more or less bounced Chamberlain into declaring war on Germany?
32. Do you think Churchill fancied himself as war leader?
33. Are you aware that tinpot dictators like starting wars so that they can strut around being war leaders?  

Hitler kind to his servants, Churchill horrid to his

British foreign policy has been disastrous since before WW1.  It remains disastrous.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_London_(1839)

So WW1 was about Belgian neutrality.

How many British lives were lost over Belgian neutrality?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_casualties

WW2 was a continuation of WW1.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

WW2 led to the loss of the British Empire which Churchill's ancestors acquired with their blood, sweat and tears.  He gambled it all away in the throw of a dice because he fancied being war leader.

How much did the British pay for Belgian Neutrality?

You work it out.


Interestingly, Churchill was horrid to his servants, while Hitler was nice to them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1204388/I-Hitlers-valet-Memoirs-manservant-final-act-devotion-burn-masters-body.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1091768/Hitler-perfect-boss-Former-maid-breaks-silence-charming-dictator.html

Major Desmond Morton, Churchill's chief advisor on Intelligence, compared his tyrannical style to the bloodiest of Roman emperors, saying: 'Winston would have been a Caligula or worse.'

While one Whitehall mandarin, Lord Hankey, called Churchill 'a rogue elephant'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1253039/A-N-WILSON-Sorry-bullies-make-best-leaders.html#ixzz20OXjzBOt

Do not forget that Churchill lost the British their empire. Why, then, is he now considered a good leader, or even a good man?

Hitler at least thought he was serving Germany when he did what he did. There is no doubt about the sincerity of his desire to advance the interests of the German people, even though it ended in disaster.

Poland has been the back yard for Germany since, oh, the last time they had a German King in the 1600s.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/german-king-of-poland-augustus-iii.html

Churchill only wanted a war because he thought it would be grand to be a successful war leader.

How interesting then that he is even now revered after he gambled away the colonies that his ancestors acquired with so much blood, sweat and tears, in one throw of a dice?

The real truth must be very hard to take and even now the British must be averting their eyes to the true cost of what they paid for Belgian neutrality in blood and land.

On both occasions the Germans banked on the British being reasonable.  On both occasions they were horribly tragically wrong.

Who are the good guys, really?

Twelve questions for British historians

1. Was it wise for Britain to enter the WW1 just to guarantee Belgian neutrality?
2. If Germany had been allowed to keep Poland in 1939 would there have been a Second World War?
3. Did you know that Poland had a Saxon (ie a German) king as recently as the 1700s?  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_III_of_Poland
4. Britain's empire spanned the world.  French had a smaller empire than the British.  Germany had no empire to speak of.  What would have been the problem with allowing Germany to keep Poland, especially as it had already had a Saxon king as recently as 1763?
5. Was Churchill a warmonger?
6. Compare and contrast the characters and personalities of Hitler and Churchill and how they were said to have treated their friends, servants, their relative sobriety and psychological health.  Whom would you regard as being more consistent, likable and trustworthy, as a friend and as an employer?
7. Did Britain's declaration of war against Germany result in the loss of its empire? 
8. If so, whom in the British government of the time would you regard as being most responsible for this loss?  (Although it was Chamberlain who declared war, it is certainly arguable that it was Churchill who bounced him into it.  The divisive party system made the swift and comradely resolution of differences impossible in their eagerness to score points over each other.  Churchill wanted war, Chamberlain didn't.  Chamberlain thought getting a piece of paper with Hitler's signature promising he would not invade Poland would allow him to claim "peace in our time".  When Hitler invaded Poland, Churchill crowed so insufferably that Chamberlain felt he had to declare war on Germany.) 
9. Is it time for the British to stop hero-worshiping a man who could be said to have gambled Britain's colonies away in a throw of a dice, and lost?
10. Can it ever be regarded as anything other than a sign of failure for an empire to lose its colonies?
11. Does Britain have a history of participating in ruinous wars?
12. Is Britain continuing to participate in ruinous wars?

Commando-style raids on UK, France and Germany ordered by Bin Laden

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8036423/Osama-bin-Laden-behind-plot-to-attack-European-cities.html


It wouldn't be too hard to launch a commando style shoot-out in a shopping centre, I would have thought, especially with Xmas coming up. It would completely destroy tourism and shopping in the UK. Somebody tell me again why the fuck we are in Afghanistan pissing these people off who understandably don't want foreign soldiers in their country shooting at their people either? 

Bin Laden said it 9/11 was about Israel. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137095,00.html 

So why THE FUCK are we dying for Israel? What has that misbegotten shithole of a country ever done for Britain? Why are British gentiles dying for Zionism?  Are they STOOOPID or something?  How many Jews or Zionists in the Armed Forces?  Are the dead and limbless not overwhelmingly gentile?  Answers on a postcard, please.

The German King of Poland - Augustus III

Augustus III - King of Poland; Elector of Saxony

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustus_III_of_Poland

He wasn't a particularly good king and he spent less than 3 years in all there during his whole reign, but he was still German and King of Poland, and he did convert to Catholicism.  

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00ts29n has his coronation music.  Do listen to it.  It is jolly, uplifting and better than Handel, IMHO. 

5:51 AM
Gorczycki, Grzegorz Gerwazy (c.1665-1734)
Nunc dimittis
Olga Pasiecznik (soprano), Piotr Lykowski (countertenor), Wojciech Parchem (tenor), Miroslaw Borzynski (bass), Sine Nomine Chamber Choir, Concerto Polacco, Marek Toporowski (chamber organ/director)

Could someone please tell me again why France and Britain couldn't let Hitler keep Poland, as Poland once even had a Saxon (ie German) King?  

Were Britain and France just ganging up on Germany just to be mean?

Did Hitler feel entitled to acquire Poland in the same way that someone playing Monopoly would wish to acquire Pentonville Road after having acquired Euston Road and The Angel Islington, when everyone else already has a set?  

I think we should be told.