Translate

Showing posts with label Gerard Batten. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gerard Batten. Show all posts

Monday, 14 January 2019

My proposal for better government in 32 minutes




Justice in Chinese society was literally of cosmic importance. Traditional Chinese thinking considered man and nature organic elements of a seamless cosmic web. Injustice of any kind did not simply rend the web in one place but placed tension on the entire structure. To restore equilibrium, the injustice had to be perfectly redressed, no more, no less. To ignore the injury was to risk catastrophe. As one late-Qing official wrote, “The recent natural disasters and interferences with heavenly harmony [i.e., the droughts and famines of the late 1870s and early 1880s] are a product of the countless number of cases where no appeal could be made, where there were no impeachments of the delinquent officials, and where consequently the innocent suffer deep injustices in the underworld”

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-asian-studies/article/ill-take-it-all-the-way-to-beijing-capital-appeals-in-the-qing/8D7BA946FB151C8BF342ACA1268CC270

The Mandate of Heaven or Tian Ming (Chinese: 天命; pinyin: Tiānmìng; Wade–Giles: T'ien-ming) is a Chinese political and religious doctrine used since ancient times to justify the rule of the King or Emperor of China. According to this belief, heaven (天, Tian)—which embodies the natural order and will of the universe—bestows the mandate on a just ruler of China, the "Son of Heaven" of the "Celestial Empire". If a ruler was overthrown, this was interpreted as an indication that the ruler was unworthy, and had lost the mandate. It was also a common belief among citizens that natural disasters such as famine and flood were signs of heaven's displeasure with the ruler, so there would often be revolts following major disasters as citizens saw these as signs that the Mandate of Heaven had been withdrawn.

MY PROPOSAL

1.  Appoint a representative to ask questions on behalf of the heterosexual male and express their concerns and fears

2.  Offer to serve as this representative

3.  If some other representative is preferred, to decide on the best way of choosing this representative.

4.  Alt-right YouTubers with more subscribers than  me might wish to do this themselves. Mark Collett and Millennial Woes - who won't allow me on their platform to explain my ideas - to come to mind. If they think they can do a better job, they should of course go right ahead.

5.  My most important question is "Why can't we have a one party state if it would work better for the government and the governed?" Frank Field, Nick Morgan and Anna Soubry have already hinted that they want a one party state, so let's all talk about it openly and honestly.

In fact, the one party state is probably the only thing that the Far Left, the Far Right and the political establishment can agree on, so let's all go for it!

Frank Field wants UniGov
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

Anna Soubry wants UniGov
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/18/anna-soubry-attacks-tory-whips-threats-over-brexit-votes

Nicky Morgan wants UniGov
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/foreign-affairs/brexit/news/100517/top-tory-mp-mulls-government-national-unity-theresa-may

Exclusive. New Government of National Unity Cabinet in full.
https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2018/12/exclusive-new-national-government-cabinet-in-full.html

6.  What is the National Interest? It  means national sovereignty and a nation governing itself independently and not being an EU vassal state.

7. Would the Noahide laws promote the National Interest?

Rabbi Sacks:

The Noahide covenant is universal, with its seven basic moral commands. These are the minimal requirements of humanity as such, the foundations of any decent society. 

Rabbi Sacks should be asked if Britain is a decent society according to the Noahide laws. We won't bother with Chief Rabbi Mirvis, who is obviously an establishment man, whatever and whoever the establishment is.

We should ask Rabbi Aaron Bassous what he thinks about "fundamental British values".
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2018/04/rabbi-bassous-calls-all-jews-with-flame.html

We should ask my favourite rabbi, Rabbi Mizrachi, how much if at all we resemble Sodom and Gomorrah and whether it is just a matter of time before God if He exists gets angry enough to zap us.

We should also ask Rabbi Sternbuch in Israel what he thinks.

We don’t want LGBT+ students in our schools, leading Charedi rabbi tells Chief Rabbi
London-born Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch hits out after Chief Rabbi said schools must be 'a safe haven for all children'
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/we-don-t-want-lgbt-students-in-our-schools-leading-charedi-rabbi-tells-chief-rabbi-1.471563

Israeli Charedi leader accuses Chief Rabbi Mirvis of ‘blasphemy’ over LGBT guide
Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch claims the British Orthodox Jewish leader was “encouraging” homosexuality by releasing guidance against bullying
https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/israeli-charedi-leader-accuses-chief-rabbi-mirvis-of-blasphemy-lgbt-guide/


Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism. Schneerson wrote:

We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-noahide-laws/

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, is Islam divine civic nationalism?

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

The features and advantages of Secular Koranism are explained at
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

QUESTIONS FOR THE OLIGARCHY

1.  If all EU member states held a referendum about whether to leave or remain in the EU, what do you think would be the result?
2.  Is democracy the best form of government when we know most voters are neither wise nor informed and only choose which bribe from which party to accept?
3,  Should the franchise be narrowed to taxpayers only?
4.  Should MPs be paid more if they are seen to defend the national interest?
5.. What is the national interest?
6.  Are liberal democracies preferable to alternative forms of government and how can this be decided?
7.  Does everything about feminism undermine marriage?
8.  Is it only under a patriarchy that enough good strong men are produced to defend the national interest?
9.  Should the patriarchy be restored even if the only way of doing this is the shaming of sluts and slut-fuckers with https://quran.com/24/2?
10. Is obedience to God's laws the only way of restoring the patriarchy?


QUESTIONS FOR UKIP:

1.  Is Christianity kaput?
2.  If Christianity is kaput, does it need replacing?
3.  If Christianity should be replaced, what should it be replaced with?
4.  Which of the following religions is closest to British traditions and why?
a) Islam  b) Hinduism  c) Buddhism
5.  If Christianity should be replaced, should it be replaced as soon as possible?


What disadvantages are there in this one size fits all one party theocracy? 

The rules are really fair enough and the only reason why you might still reject it is because you are an Islamophobe.  An Islamophobe is by definition someone who hates and fears irrationally. If you deny that your hatred and fear of Islam is irrational and that you see no circumstances under which it would be irrational to hate and fear Islam and Muslims, then you are definitely an Islamophobe. If so, please get in touch with to discuss it on my channel, especially if your name is Gerard Batten.

Sunday, 23 September 2018

Thoughts on UKIP leader Gerard Batten saying Muslim ideology legitimises sex slaves





One of the features of Islam is that it regulates institutions and makes it contractual. Slavery is an institution like marriage and prostitution. The Koran makes marriage contractual, has never forbidden slavery and allows you to have slave girls who can choose to manumit themselves through prostitution.

24:33

And let those who find not the financial means for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah enriches them of His Bounty. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), give them such writing, if you know that they are good and trustworthy. And give them something yourselves out of the wealth of Allah which He has bestowed upon you. And force not your maids to prostitution, if they desire chastity, in order that you may make a gain in the (perishable) goods of this worldly life. But if anyone compels them (to prostitution), then after such compulsion, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to those women, i.e. He will forgive them because they have been forced to do this evil action unwillingly).

The taking of slave girls is a well-established convention of war going back to Trojan times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Briseis

In Greek mythology, Briseis, a daughter of Briseus, was a princess of Lyrnessus. Briseis was said to have had long golden hair, blue eyes, and fair skin and she was considered to be very beautiful and clever. Her husband was Mynes. When Achilles led the assault on Lyrnessus during the Trojan War, she was captured and her family (including her father, mother, three brothers and husband) died at his hands. She was subsequently given to Achilles as a war prize to be his concubine. In the Trojan War, captive women like Briseis were regarded as slaves and could be traded amongst the warriors.
Achilles' surrender of Briseis to Agamemnon, from the House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii, fresco, 1st century AD, now in the Naples National Archaeological Museum


Islamophobes will see no contradiciton in claiming that Achilles was both semi-divine and heroic while regarding Muslims practising the same ancient and well-established convention of warfare as barbaric and base.

Batten calls Islam "totalitarian" and equates it with Nazism and Communism even though it has been said that 2:256 of the Koran was the basis for the First Amendment.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-first-amendment-was-derived-from.html

It is in fact Christianity that is "totalitarian" since the Doctrine of the Trinity is all about establishing the principle that if you don't believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the eternal and supreme Abrahamic God, you ain't Christian and only good Christians go to heaven.

He goes on to say that all Muslim countries are "repressive regimes and in conflict internally". Libya was doing fine until NATO decided to topple Gaddafi and steal its oil. It is not exactly unknown for the West to practise a system of divide and rule to get the different factions of a country fighitng each other and pay mercenaries to destabilise and overthrow established governments who are not deemed democratic by the West.

Russia is technically a liberal democracy, but that does not prevent Western media insisting that Putin is a dictator operating a repressive and corrupt regime.

Batten says Muslims are responsible for "industrialised sexual exploitation for money for their own perverted purposes". Is doing something for money a perverted purpose? He claims Muslims have "an ideological justification" for being pimps (which is another term for sex trafficker). I wonder which verse in the Koran he is referring to!

Islam, he says is a "death cult". What is a "death cult" anyway? While Islamophobes are happy to equate "death cult" with Islam, the more objective might care to remember that Islam is one of the three Abrahamic faiths. Can the Islamophobes who call Islam a "death cult" give another example of one, or was the term invented specially and only for Islam?

UKIP would repeal hate speech guidelines, abolish the Equality Act of 2010, shut down the Equalities and Human Rights Commission and the government Equalities Office. (I am actually in favour of this.)


Monday, 19 May 2014

How to hurt UKIP, prove its Islamophobia and put its only Muslim MEP candidate in an awkward position


http://www.amjadbashir.co.uk/

http://answering-islam.org/Terrorism/EuropeCharter.pdf
What is the religion of Sam Solomon ,who drafted this charter?

Do Jews never use violence to get their way?

Do liberals never use violence to get their way?

Isn't sauce for the goose also sauce for the gander, or not in UKIP Land?

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/02/04/gerard-batten-muslims-ukip-charter_n_4726200.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9_gDndfSsA
Gerard Batten introduces Amjad Bashir, no on stage demands for him to sign the undertaking, and no public signing of charter by Amjad Bashir ...

What would happen to Amjad Bashir if he did?  Would he be considered a heretic by other Muslims? Would he be getting a brick through his window instead of Gerard Batten?

If I had been UKIP Directrix of Communications instead of that dullard Paul O'Flynn I would have made Nigel Farage make Gerard Batten formerly withdraw that proposal, but that risk-averse moral coward Nigel Farage is probably too afraid to tackle him because of his perceived seniority.  

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Nick Griffin tells Claire Khaw to fuck off

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkXcVA2nYqk#t=28

What Nick Griffin's said in Germany:
  1. Civic nationalist parties like UKIP and Front Nationale who are doing well are condemned by him for being "phony nationalists".  
  2. Even if they were elected they would be overwhelmed by left-wing rioting and fall within the year.
  3. Nuremberg is not a German city now but a Turkish city.  
  4. Russia is the only European country left in the West.  The rest of the West are full of immigrants and Muslims.
  5. The EU elite are conspiring to start WW3.  
  6. Russia and Germany must form a nationalist alliance.  

He said nothing about the Equality Act 2010 and nothing about abolishing No Fault Divorce, as I had urged him to.

MY SUGGESTED BNP STRATEGY FOR GE 2015


  1. If UKIP won't repeal the Equality Act 2010 then the BNP should. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/05/ukip-councillor-donna-edmunds-women-gay-people
  2. If UKIP won't abolish no fault divorce then the BNP should.
  3. If UKIP won't be the party of small business then the BNP should be.
  4. If UKIP won't denounce feminism then the BNP should.  
  5. If UKIP won't oppose gay marriage then BNP should. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/World/UK/UKIP-will-not-oppose-gay-marriage-Nigel-Farage/articleshow/32313979.cms
  6. Declare the BNP to be officially and exclusively civic nationalist.
  7. Annul Claire Khaw's expulsion
  8. Appoint Claire Khaw as BNP Director of Communications
  9. Become bigger than UKIP
  10. Absorb UKIP
  11. Rival LibDems
  12. Become bigger than LibDems
  13. Hold the balance of power after GE 2015

Niche marketing must be the way forward for the BNP.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niche_market


Below are my messages to him:


CK to NG  19/3/14  2126
Your only chance of retaining any credibility with the public is to make the party officially and exclusively civic nationalist.  What are the problems you anticipate and what objections do you have to simply filling up the policy vacuum Farage leaves?  If he won’t repeal the Equality Act you will.  If he won’t abolish gay marriage you will.  Whatever he won't do you take up the slack?  What do you think?


CK to NG  19/3/14  2132
Please tell me your concerns and objections to repeal Equality Act and abolish no fault divorce if you find them objectionable.  I may already have the solution.  


CK to NG  20/3/14  0810
A belated but Damascene conversion to civic nationalism by you would attract media attention.  People would leave the party but you are just getting rid of the dross.

CK to NG  20/3/14  0819
Once the dross has left the good people will join.  Instead of pretending you aren’t racist you can say why repealing the Equality Act and abolishing no fault divorce would be in the national interest.

I am afraid what follows was a rather dismissive response from the Chairman:

NG to CK  20/3/14  0852 
Do stop wasting your time and mine.  Mass immigration has been a deliberate genocide plan against white people from the very beginning.  Civic nationalists are not only cowards but collaborators with the biggest crime in human history.  A crank who poses with assault rifle and a swastika has not the slightest right to lecture the BNP.  http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/which-type-of-mangina-are-you So, to put it politely and for the avoidance of doubt: Fuck off!

I received no further response to my subsequent messages:

CK to NG  20/3/14  0901
That photo was for the purpose of making the point that it is logically impossible for me to be a Nazi and that I am as much a Nazi as I would be a policeman if I had been photographed outside a police station with a policeman’s helmet on my head.  It is also for making the point that the British don’t care much for logic.  I have never said anything antisemitic unlike you or tried to plead the 5th Amendment on Question Time re Holocaust Denial.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222441/Question-Time-panellist-launches-extraordinary-attack-BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin.html Instead, I have consistently asked: what number is Holocaust Denial?


CK to NG  20/3/14  0904
“Mass immigration has been a deliberate genocide plan against white people from the very beginning.”  By whom?


CK to NG  20/3/14  0906
“Civic nationalists are not only cowards but collaborators with the biggest crime in human history.”  I am a civic nationalist.  How have I been cowardly?


CK to NG  20/3/14  0913 That photo gives me notoriety and links me to nationalism.  You are probably aware that a conventional career path in politics is closed to me and that I must somehow make myself known as I am not a member of any party. 


CK to NG  20/3/14  0927
I would have thought that a nationalist would want to repeal the Equality Act.  I know John Tyndall would have supported my proposal and that the BNP wanted to repeal the Sex Discrimination Act in the 1990s.  You are not helping your people by failing to make nationalism an attractive, moral and noble ideology.  Instead, nationalism is now associated with CHAVs in Islamophobic demos.  Even UKIP have gone further than you in displays of Islamophobia eg screening of Fitna in the House of Lords http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/mar/05/geert-wilders-house-of-lords, Gerard Batten’s proposal to make Muslims promise not to commit terrorism. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/04/ukip-mep-gerard-batten-muslims-sign-charter-rejecting-violence

CK to NG  20/3/14  0933
What have you got against proposing the abolition of no fault divorce which undermines the institution of marriage?  It is the desecration of this institution that has caused racial and national degeneracy, has it not? http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html  [85% of Jamaican mothers SSMs.  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts] You do know that most British babies are illegitimate, don’t you? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html Most children of British mothers born out of wedlock  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517 'The whites have become black' says David Starkey


CK to NG  20/3/14  0943
Your trouble is that you lower your morals to match those of your core supporters.  Perhaps my trouble is that I try to raise the morals of those I hope will support me.  I can tell you how to do better and you owe it to yourself and your cause to understand my ideas before you reject them.  If you tell me your practical and philosophical objections to my proposals then I can propose solutions which you would be free to reject or implement.  WHY won’t you propose repealing/abolishing EA/NFD?

CK to NG  20/3/14  1001
I was in The Guardian against last Friday.  http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/13/hugh-muir-diary-pickles-audit-commission I can probably attract more publicity than you can these days.  Who else in nationalism has been described by The Guardian as “philosopher activist”? http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/may/29/hugh-muir-diary-waterboarding-bbc  I am also legally-trained.  I am probably your last hope before you face electoral meltdown next year.  Now tell me why you won’t propose to do away with Equality Act and no-fault divorce.  If it is because you are afraid of a mass resignation of the Advisory Council I have just the solution, but you have to act fast.  

http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/content/contact is where you can send him messages saying you are a Eurosceptic who would vote BNP instead of UKIP but only if he does what I have suggested above and at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/what-bnp-can-do-now-that-ukip-has.html


Tuesday, 11 March 2014

Ukip members are either jokers or 'literally akin to Nazis', claims senior Tory MP

Mr Halfon, who is Jewish, said: ‘To me there are two kinds of UKIP – the [former defence spokesman] Godfrey Bloom guy who’s like a cross between Sid James and Bernard Manning, and then there's a much more sinister element, like the MEP who said every Muslim has got to sign a declaration of non-violence, which to me is literally akin to the Nazis saying Jews should wear a yellow star.

‘I genuinely find it abhorrent and frightening. I'm amazed that man is still an MEP. How someone could say such a thing and then not apologise for it…’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2574995/Ukip-members-akin-Nazis-claims-Tory-MP-Robert-Halfon.html

Gerard Batten's idea is similar to Dave Jones' idea of making Muslims sign a declaration that they would never do anything to change the laws of this country. Here is Dave Jones at
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/news/article/2209/calderdale-council-candidate-arrested-on-susp


I actually find Batten's Islamophobia repulsive. It is so stupid too, like when you have to fill in one of those forms asking if you are a criminal or a terrorist when you are about to enter the US
http://elliott.org/blog/department-of-homeland-security-to-visitors-are-you-a-terrorist-or-a-nazi/
declaring that you do not intend to commit criminal or terrorist activity. Repulsive, lame and utterly ineffective.

Dave at least has the excuse of not having completed his secondary education.  Gerard Batten does not.

In fact, UKIP are in many ways more repulsively Islamphobic than the BNP.

It was Lord Pearson who described Geert Wiilders - the man who wanted to ban the Koran - as a "very great man"  


The BNP to their credit condemned the invasion of the Iraq and Afghanistan ab initio, while UKIP remain resolutely Neocon with their very own Friends of Israel pretending not to understand why young Muslims who care about foreign policy might get restive about NATO members bombing Muslim countries.   

Pathological cowards who do not fear idolatry is a mortal sin because they are hypocrites and atheists

Speakers Corner 2:00  Middle class Westerners are too afraid to say how afraid they are. 3:00  The degenerate matriarchy Olson agrees with S...