http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/21/counter-terrorism-funds-pakistan
The solution to the shortfall in terrorism funds is idiotically simple that even a child could tell you the answer.
1. Stop giving more terrorists more reasons to hate you.
2. Stop making Muslims all over the world hate you.
3. Stop putting British Muslims in an impossible position.
4. Stop associating ourselves with Israel and the US.
5. Stop the killing of white boys by the Taliban.
6. Stop white boys killing Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan.
7. Stop the war.
THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label Islamic terrorism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamic terrorism. Show all posts
Thursday, 21 January 2010
Tuesday, 22 April 2008
How a BNP canvasser might approach a Muslim householder
SCENARIO
BNP canvasser knocks on Muslim householder. Door opens.
BNP: Good day, Madam/Sir. I am sorry to interrupt your prayers but I wonder if I could canvass your opinion on a number of issues.
Muslim: What do you want?
BNP: We were wondering what you feel about paying for the London Olympics. Are you pleased to pay as a Londoner to host it or would you prefer that the Olympics is held in Athens where we feel it really belongs, permanently? We would invite Athens to host the 2012 Olympics too, if they want. We find that most Londoners like this idea and wonder if you do too.
We know that you know we don't like you and you don't like us, but we are only canvassing your second vote.
How would you feel about voting for a party that would not have invaded Iraq if it had been in power or propped up Israel unconditionally, if it had been in power? You must know that quite a few of us at the BNP cannot decide whether we dislike Jews or Muslims more and would have left the Middle East well alone.
While you dislike us and think we want you out, may we remind you using your second vote on us on 1 May is quite safe?
Remember, the Labour Party which you are supposed to trust was the one who invaded Iraq and are even now plotting to enact more police state anti-terrorist legislation. We at the BNP have not messed up anyone's country and just want to be left alone, as you probably do.
I suppose you know that what would most upset the government is for us to do even better than they fear?
How would you feel about upsetting the government by using your second vote to vote BNP? A BNP mayor cannot repatriate anyone. And did you know we are offering to pay £50,000 - yes £50,000! - per ethnic to go home? We are not just proposing to chuck you out like Idi Amin did, you know.
Another issue is this, what do you feel about immigration? Do you share our concerns or are you just happy to have more people coming in?
Can you really not understand why white working class people might feel threatened and want to join the BNP?
Can you honestly say that if you were born white working class you yourself would not join the BNP?
If you can bring yourself to use your second vote as we hope you will, it would be great if you would let us know that you have done so and indeed tell others that you are proposing to do this. It is, haha, a bit like suicide voting without actually committing suicide, you know! If you do, we will give you free membership for a year and put your name down as a Martyr in the cause of upsetting and alarming our warmongering ruling classes.
You have nothing to lose anyway. You can vote for Ken who wants you to have your supermosque in Newham (or even Brian Paddick if you are tired of Ken) AND you can also vote for us to upset and alarm our ruling class! Talk about having your cake and eating it!
Oh, and the only anti-Muslim thing we have in our London manifesto is the banning of the niqab in public places and prevent more mosques being built - you already have plenty and are in any case still able to turn empty churches into mosques. I hope you can see that this is in the interests of the prevention of crime and terrorism. You are probably aware that criminals do disguise themselves as Muslim women in burqas. You also already know that the sight of women dressed as black crows just creates fear and loathing like nothing else and reminds people about what they see as the Muslim threat. As you can see, it is for your protection too.
We hope you will give this option your serious Islamic consideration and discuss it with your mosque elders.
Well, thank you for your listening, Mr/Ms Muslim Voter. I am sorry to have disturbed your prayers and hope you will consider using your second vote on the BNP, if you do indeed wish to upset our ruling classes, who are after all the ones who have invaded Muslim lands, who now limit the free speech of your imams, and occasionally raid your houses and shoot non-terrorist Muslims for no good reason, like those brothers in Forest Gate who grew a beard.
Lecture by Sean Gabb, Director of the Libertarian Alliance - "Islam - our enemy?"http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4288936354899104985
Vote: Should the BNP also canvass the London Muslim's second vote for 1 May?
http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=106
BNP canvasser knocks on Muslim householder. Door opens.
BNP: Good day, Madam/Sir. I am sorry to interrupt your prayers but I wonder if I could canvass your opinion on a number of issues.
Muslim: What do you want?
BNP: We were wondering what you feel about paying for the London Olympics. Are you pleased to pay as a Londoner to host it or would you prefer that the Olympics is held in Athens where we feel it really belongs, permanently? We would invite Athens to host the 2012 Olympics too, if they want. We find that most Londoners like this idea and wonder if you do too.
We know that you know we don't like you and you don't like us, but we are only canvassing your second vote.
How would you feel about voting for a party that would not have invaded Iraq if it had been in power or propped up Israel unconditionally, if it had been in power? You must know that quite a few of us at the BNP cannot decide whether we dislike Jews or Muslims more and would have left the Middle East well alone.
While you dislike us and think we want you out, may we remind you using your second vote on us on 1 May is quite safe?
Remember, the Labour Party which you are supposed to trust was the one who invaded Iraq and are even now plotting to enact more police state anti-terrorist legislation. We at the BNP have not messed up anyone's country and just want to be left alone, as you probably do.
I suppose you know that what would most upset the government is for us to do even better than they fear?
How would you feel about upsetting the government by using your second vote to vote BNP? A BNP mayor cannot repatriate anyone. And did you know we are offering to pay £50,000 - yes £50,000! - per ethnic to go home? We are not just proposing to chuck you out like Idi Amin did, you know.
Another issue is this, what do you feel about immigration? Do you share our concerns or are you just happy to have more people coming in?
Can you really not understand why white working class people might feel threatened and want to join the BNP?
Can you honestly say that if you were born white working class you yourself would not join the BNP?
If you can bring yourself to use your second vote as we hope you will, it would be great if you would let us know that you have done so and indeed tell others that you are proposing to do this. It is, haha, a bit like suicide voting without actually committing suicide, you know! If you do, we will give you free membership for a year and put your name down as a Martyr in the cause of upsetting and alarming our warmongering ruling classes.
You have nothing to lose anyway. You can vote for Ken who wants you to have your supermosque in Newham (or even Brian Paddick if you are tired of Ken) AND you can also vote for us to upset and alarm our ruling class! Talk about having your cake and eating it!
Oh, and the only anti-Muslim thing we have in our London manifesto is the banning of the niqab in public places and prevent more mosques being built - you already have plenty and are in any case still able to turn empty churches into mosques. I hope you can see that this is in the interests of the prevention of crime and terrorism. You are probably aware that criminals do disguise themselves as Muslim women in burqas. You also already know that the sight of women dressed as black crows just creates fear and loathing like nothing else and reminds people about what they see as the Muslim threat. As you can see, it is for your protection too.
We hope you will give this option your serious Islamic consideration and discuss it with your mosque elders.
Well, thank you for your listening, Mr/Ms Muslim Voter. I am sorry to have disturbed your prayers and hope you will consider using your second vote on the BNP, if you do indeed wish to upset our ruling classes, who are after all the ones who have invaded Muslim lands, who now limit the free speech of your imams, and occasionally raid your houses and shoot non-terrorist Muslims for no good reason, like those brothers in Forest Gate who grew a beard.
Lecture by Sean Gabb, Director of the Libertarian Alliance - "Islam - our enemy?"http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4288936354899104985
Vote: Should the BNP also canvass the London Muslim's second vote for 1 May?
http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=106
Monday, 14 April 2008
OK for Buddhists and Hindus to be theocratic but not Muslims?
This was found at http://www.blogistan.co.uk/blog/mt.php/2008/04/08/the_torchs_progress
The poster was someone called "whatever" with no further details. His thoughtful comments follow.
The granting of the Olympics to the Chinese must have been a God-send to the "civilised" world. It was a passport to "western civilisation" to penetrate the Great Wall of China and inflict some "civilised" damage.
Because of this, the Olympics have been hijacked by the US and other “civilised” nations. The Olympics are no longer anything to do with sport and competition anymore.
Thanks to the “civilised world” the Olympic Torch now burns hatred, scores political goals and encourages terrorism in China.
In all this, as a Muslim, I notice that the Tibetan fanatic terrorists burnt a mosque in the recent rioting. It was an article posted by few news sites.
I also note that the US, Britain and Europe is encouraging the Tibetan fanatic Papal human God Dalai Lama to spread discontent, riots and even terrorism in China and Chinese territories. This method of attacking China through dissident groups by financial and logistical US (British and European) support surely has not gone unnoticed by those little people in China.
So there is one thing that doesn't quite make sense. The US, Britain and Europe complain of a terrorism that is linked to the religion of Islam in the respective countries yet promote and condone terrorism in China and Chinese territories through a so called human god???
Which brings me back to another point that links in with Tibet/China. If what is happening there is due to the territorial ambitions and national identity of Tibetan Exiles, then is it not possible that the terrorism in Britain, US and Europe (Br,US,E) is equally being orchestrated by foreign powers who have been interfered with by Br,US,E. The point being that we are not seeing Islamic Terrorism here in the "civilised world" but rather a new form of warfare between nations.
The classification of the warfare/terrorism taking place in Br,US,E is conveniently classified as Islamic Terrorism so that it calls for vigilance against 80% of nations with a grudge against Br,US,E.
Will the Chinese now retaliate with this new kind of warfare and use the fact that the US and Britain have no respect for human rights (water-boarding, detention of suspects on whims for as long as is deemed fit, demonisation of minorities, killing prisoners of war etc, etc.) to say that Br,US,E should shut up and respect their own people and human rights before they feel the need to criticize others.
The poster was someone called "whatever" with no further details. His thoughtful comments follow.
The granting of the Olympics to the Chinese must have been a God-send to the "civilised" world. It was a passport to "western civilisation" to penetrate the Great Wall of China and inflict some "civilised" damage.
Because of this, the Olympics have been hijacked by the US and other “civilised” nations. The Olympics are no longer anything to do with sport and competition anymore.
Thanks to the “civilised world” the Olympic Torch now burns hatred, scores political goals and encourages terrorism in China.
In all this, as a Muslim, I notice that the Tibetan fanatic terrorists burnt a mosque in the recent rioting. It was an article posted by few news sites.
I also note that the US, Britain and Europe is encouraging the Tibetan fanatic Papal human God Dalai Lama to spread discontent, riots and even terrorism in China and Chinese territories. This method of attacking China through dissident groups by financial and logistical US (British and European) support surely has not gone unnoticed by those little people in China.
So there is one thing that doesn't quite make sense. The US, Britain and Europe complain of a terrorism that is linked to the religion of Islam in the respective countries yet promote and condone terrorism in China and Chinese territories through a so called human god???
Which brings me back to another point that links in with Tibet/China. If what is happening there is due to the territorial ambitions and national identity of Tibetan Exiles, then is it not possible that the terrorism in Britain, US and Europe (Br,US,E) is equally being orchestrated by foreign powers who have been interfered with by Br,US,E. The point being that we are not seeing Islamic Terrorism here in the "civilised world" but rather a new form of warfare between nations.
The classification of the warfare/terrorism taking place in Br,US,E is conveniently classified as Islamic Terrorism so that it calls for vigilance against 80% of nations with a grudge against Br,US,E.
Will the Chinese now retaliate with this new kind of warfare and use the fact that the US and Britain have no respect for human rights (water-boarding, detention of suspects on whims for as long as is deemed fit, demonisation of minorities, killing prisoners of war etc, etc.) to say that Br,US,E should shut up and respect their own people and human rights before they feel the need to criticize others.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
God behaving badly
1:03:00 CLAIRE KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God. ...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
I think having your child diagnosed as having Asperger's is a kind of insurance against people saying you are a bad parent or that your...