THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Christianity has no principle other than that of worshipping a dead Jewish man convicted of blasphemy by Jews. Not only do Christians worship an executed blasphemer, they worship Jesus as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe.
Is our global village being punished by God for 2000 years of blasphemy and idolatry practised by Christians with the global pandemic?
There are still 2.2 billion Christians worshipping idolatrously and blasphemously a Jew convicted of blasphemy. Worshipping someone convicted of blasphemy means affirming that blasphemy and this Christians have been doing for 2000 years.
Muslims could also consider atoning for omitting to admonish Christians for claiming that God has begotten a son as 18:4 of the Koran commands.
The Day of Atonement is now just around the corner. Will Jews now finally atone for their omission of not pointing out that Christians are not righteous gentiles because they are blasphemers and idolaters? And will Muslims also join them in so doing?
As for Christians, they can only atone by ceasing their practice of idolatry and blasphemy in the hope of avoiding the wrath of God, if He exists.
I say Jews are the world's most ancient and powerful tribe. I also say they are the aristocracy of humanity, but that doesn't mean I think aristocrats are more moral than commoners, only that they are supposed to adhere to higher standards and will be punished more severely if they fail. I also say that Jewish privilege should not be available for unobservant Jews and for this reason have been struck off the Register of Jews that I propose. Registrars of this Register shall be rabbis. The Registry is for the purpose of protecting Jews and gentiles against each other. If Jews are suffering an identity crisis, then so will the rest of us.
I am saying if Jews were following their own principles, they would have to support Secular Koranism because according to their own beliefs, they are God's Chosen People, chosen to promote the Noahide laws amongst gentiles. Secular Koranism is more Noahide than Christianity because it is based on the Koran, and Jews already acknowledge that Islam is is the most Noahide of all the world religions.
If you are an atheist always complaining about Jews and Muslims who appear to have taken over your country, should it not be patently obvious what the people you complain about have that you yourself lack?
If the idea of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God fills you with revulsion and the idea that your ancestors were forcibly converted into this religion fills you with rage, does this not mean that the religion of your ancestors was an illegitimate religion cooked up by con men who are now largely known for their sexual scandals as Creatures of the Liberal State? If there are only two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles and the one you are identified with has already failed, what should you do?
Perhaps you should wonder if the Abrahamic God if He exists is capable of a sustaining a rather cruel practical joke for 2000 years and wondering when you will notice that a trick has been played on you. If you were paying attention or cared about the principle of the thing, you would have noticed by now.
The principle of the thing is:
If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck, is it a duck?
Isn't worshipping a man idolatrous?
Isn't worshipping this man as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God ipso facto idolatrous and blasphemous?
If Trinitarian doctrine sounds idolatrous and blasphemous, is it in fact blasphemous and idolatrous?
What do Jews and Muslims say about Christianity? What does the fact that Jews are forbidden to enter churches but allowed to enter mosques tell you about their attitude to what would be for them the capital offence of idolatry if the Torah were still followed? What was Christ crucified for? He was crucified for the blasphemy of saying that his papa was the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe and now exists outside it as pure spirit.
Atheists and nihilists who know what religion is for but do not wish to make the sacrifices their ancestors did - that of marrying and having legitimate children - will be avoiding the question. They avoid the question because the answer - that of replacing a broken moral system forbidden by God with one effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality - is obvious.
Perhaps this is really a fight between the religious against the irreligious. God if He exists would favour the former. For nationalists to get what they want they would have to restore the patriarchy, and the patriarchy can only be restored with marriage and family values. https://t.co/7mmxJfU4un
The clear blue water between feminists and nationalists against Jews and Muslims is that the former condone fornication and are dysgenic, while the latter practice marriage and family values which is eugenic. Whom would God favour if He exists? The answer is obvious.
The least a religion should do for you is to ensure that most parents in your society are married parents. If Christianity can no longer do that, it is a clear sign that it should be taken out with the trash. https://t.co/DfyW07YtFs
"The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016." Jews have warned heedless Christians over the years. https://t.co/3X7WmQH0mu No nationalist has expressed any concern over widespread bastardy.
Jews over the years have stuck their necks out for the gentile, but this is never acknowledged by the antisemites who either cannot see it or refuse to acknowledge it. https://t.co/0UWhWXvq2d
Keith Joseph was another Jew who stuck his neck out over unmarried mothers. https://t.co/cqeGtzr8md Is there a single nationalist who has proposed the abolition of no fault divorce? They seem deliberately blind to the connection between bastardy and degeneracy.
Nationalists do not seem aware of the bad impression angry low status, low education and low income bachelors who are obviously unmarriageable create. Worst of all, they are so intellectually dishonest they call me mad for raising the issue of widespread bastardy and degeneracy.
Instead of discussing social, political and economic, low-courage nationalists prefer to dwell on their pet hatreds of Jews and Muslims. It seems agreeing with each other on how much they hate Jews, Muslims and non-whites is *the only thing* that binds them together.
As if their low-courage tactic of only complaining and never proposing solutions were not bad enough, when solutions are suggested, they collectively conspire to suppress and ignore them. Not discussing my solutions has been the major nationalist preoccupation for a decade now.
The moment British men show they are prepared to end the creation of widespread bastardy and show that they are men worth marrying, they will get their country back. However, it seems they are currently content to continue hating Jews, Muslims, non-whites and immigrants.
Please bear in mind that a Torah theocracy would be much harsher and more restrictive than Secular Koranism. If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". https://t.co/NmH7a3u0iKhttps://t.co/KEgMMKzbM8
The Jewish Torah (the first five books of the Hebrew Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) serves as a common religious reference for Judaism. Stoning is the method of execution mentioned most frequently in the Torah. (Murder is not mentioned as an offense punishable by stoning, but it seems that a member of the victim's family was allowed to kill the murderer; see avenger of blood.) The crimes punishable by stoning were the following:
Touching Mount Sinai while God was giving Moses the Ten Commandments, Exodus 19:13
An ox that gores someone to death should be stoned, Exodus 21:28
Having a "familiar spirit" (or being a necromancer) or being a "wizard", Leviticus 20:27
Enticing others to polytheism, Deuteronomy 13:7–11
Cursing God, Leviticus 24:10–16
Engaging in idolatry, Deuteronomy 17:2–7; or seducing others to do so, Deuteronomy 13:7–12
"Rebellion" against parents, after repeated warnings, Deuteronomy 21:18–21
Getting married as though a virgin, when not a virgin, Deuteronomy 22:13–21
Sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a town, since she did not cry out, Deuteronomy 22:23–24; both parties should be stoned to death
Forced sexual intercourse between a man and a woman engaged to another man in a field, where no one could hear her cries and save her, Deuteronomy 22:25–27; the man should be stoned
Describing the stoning of those who entice others to apostates from Judaism, the Torah states:
If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter, or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which [is] as thine own soul, entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; [Namely], of the gods of the people which [are] round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the [one] end of the earth even unto the [other] end of the earth; Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.
— Deuteronomy 13:6–10
Quran
"And those who accuse chaste women then do not bring four witnesses, flog them, (giving) eighty stripes, and do not admit any evidence from them ever; and these it is that are the transgressors. Except those who repent after this and act aright, for surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." — Qur'an, Sura 24 (An-Nur), ayat 4-5
The Qur'an does not mention the act of stoning (Rajm) for any crime.
Contrary to popular belief, the punishment for Adultery (Zina) in the Quran is not stoning to death but flogging with a 100 lashes (if the accuser can provide 4 witnesses to the act). If the accuser cannot produce 4 witnesses, he himself will be punished by flogging with 80 lashes.
"The woman and the man guilty of fornication/adultery,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment."
They complain about Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism AKA Intersectionality. Protect yourself from Cultural Marxism with Secular Koranism!
34:00 The antisemitic assumption of this Islamophobic Australian Hindu is that malign Jews would deliberately destroy a civilisation's national identity because that would lower the gentile and elevate the Jew, turning our global village into a globo homo gayplex and Sodom and Gomorrah, and then fleeing to Israel when the balloon goes up. If this is so, these Jews have forgotten about the stumbling block they are not supposed to be putting in the way of anyone at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stumbling_block
45:00 Secular Koranism is discussed. Jennifer, do you know any Hindus who have read the Koran? Do you know how much reading of Hindu scripture is required by Brahmin priests and do they have to pass written examinations in this? I suspect most of them are hardly scholars, perhaps barely literate, just masters of theatricality and ceremony. An Islamic scholar would be expected to know the Koran inside out.
46:00 After two or three generations after Secular Koranism has been introduced, the overwhelming majority will believe in the Abrahamic God. I can confidently predict this because parents who don't literally believe in Santa now willingly become the High Priests and High Priestesses of the Cult of Santa at Christmas. Doubtless they will do the same thing when, after Secular Koranism becomes the law of the land, couples marry and go on to bring up the legitimate children that they have living together as a couple. Introducing God to them from a young age will be the equivalent of introducing them to the policeman who will be in their heads for the rest of their lives.
1:01:00 Elliott was asking why I was publicising Halsey's stream on https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/01/halsey-english-discusses-secular.html. Obviously, I was doing that in the hope of getting invited on his show and to get the alt-right YouTubers he mentioned to notice the Creator of Secular Koranism. If they have already heard of me, then obviously, I wanted to remind them of Secular Koranism and to emphasise that it is being discussed widely in alt-right circles. They may not like it, but they cannot think of a better solution to all their problems or deny that my diagnosis of the cause of Western malaise is correct. If my diagnoses is accepted as correct, then my prescription for its cure should logically and necessarily be also accepted. I do realise however that society can stay irrational for longer than I can stay alive. Since my ideas are so easy to remember, it would not be the end of the world if I will be no longer be around to be consulted to advise and warn Western governments of the finer points of Secular Koranism to avoid the pitfalls of common or garden sharia as the Muslims interpret it and apply what they erroneously believe to be Islamic principles.
My Grand Plan is to get Jews to promote Secular Koranism out of self interest. Most diasporas Jews in the West like Halsey want to stay where they are. To prevent Western nations from becoming failed states in the turbulent years to come, they must use Secular Koranism to displace the malign matriarchy run by the preferences of immoral and irresponsible women and their ill-bred bastards. Only under a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest thereby preventing societal collapse. Jews have a particular role in this because they have yet to accept that Israel should be a theocracy.
Once Israel becomes a theocracy, there will be peace with its Arab neighbours, particular when Israel adopts Secular Koranism. Israeli Jews should point to https://quran.com/17/104 as evidence that the Koran is also Zionist. God obviously intends for Jews to live in Israel but Israel must be an independent nation of priests, not the mere colonial outpost of a morally rotten empire promoting global gay marriage and global Sodom and Gomorrah.
No rational Israeli Jew - religious or not- would choose a Torah theocracy because its implementation would mean being stoned to death for every little thing, including breaking the Sabbath. As Prophetess of Secular Koranism, I contend that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy, and will not insist on it being a Torah theocracy, because that would be too hard even on Jews.
Once Israel adopts Secular Koranism, Western nations would follow suit, encouraging China and Russia to do so by example.
In this way will the world be a better place under Global Sharia. (Secular Koranism is basically sharia interpreted by me, a non-Muslim, ex-liberal and ex-feminist agnostic.)
1:07:00 Jennifer: "That's exactly what Claire Khaw does!" Why are you comparing me with Hank Yoo, the Oriental who thinks he is a White Supremacist, whom you say has adopted American culture? Taking an interest in US politics and observing the alt-right as an ethnographer is hardly adopting American culture. What exactly has Yoo done that I have done? Is promoting Secular Koranism adopting Western culture? Perhaps it is, in the best intellectual traditions of Western thought! http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
1:10:00 Feminism rode into town on the coat-tails of egalitarianism. Egalitarianism comes from the French Revolution promoting the principles of Equality, Fraternity and Liberty. Feminism had established a matriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who did not respect their children enough to prevent them from being born the bastards of people who would have been treated as sex offenders by https://quran.com/24/2) which displaced the patriarchy (ie a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring).
1:13:00 Fascism is one party-ism. The fasces symbol originated from Rome meant to represent national unity and the authority of the state. It can be found in Congress. https://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/House-Chamber/Rostrum/ A Fascist is a Conservative who knows what it takes to promote Conservatism. But what is Conservatism? It is meaningless if it does not include social conservatism, and social conservatism means respecting the practice of marriage and upholding family values which the degenerates of the West are no longer capable of doing because the West is now a matriarchy.
Conservatism was really Theocracy Lite since it Conservatism was a defensive ideology created as a reaction to the ideas of the French Revolution which an anti-clerical revolt when they could no longer stomach the greed and corruption of the Catholic Church and their monarch associated with it. Because of the inferior scripture of the New Testament, no clear principles can be established. Because the Koran is clearly superior in concept and expression, anyone who has read it would be in no doubt as to its principles which easily translates into legislation.
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.
All advanced civilisations are patriarchies; all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents
Why are Canadian men more cucked than American men? Because the illegitimacy rate is higher in Canada.
Patriarchy has a pyramid and military command structure that allows orders from above given by the alpha male to be carried out by those below by the beta males. Patriarchy brings about male solidarity and enables male co-operation, allowing a society to deal firmly and effectively with its internal and external enemies.
Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.
Matriarchy is the sea, patriarchy is coastal defences.
In short, it creates a hierarchical society where there is a place for everyone and everyone knows his or her place. There is less conflict in these societies than those who believe in the polite fiction of equality.
Left untreated, the disease of feminism could turn your society back to the barbarism of human civilisation before marriage was invented and could even result in the most extreme matriarchy known to us: the bee colony. We already know that male chicks are destroyed after being hatched in chicken farms. We certainly know that the only thing about feminism that men like is how it lowers the price of sex. Feminism uses sexual liberation to bribe and distract men from the damage it is doing to the civilisation their male ancestors created.
If religion used to be the opium of the people when the West took its religion seriously, then extramarital sex is now the opium of atheist degenerates of the West and those who ape the worst of the West.
This is a good livestream because it is actually about something important ie Jews, Secular Koranism and me, of course. I am basically telling Jews that Secular Koranism could save them from having to all flee to Israel and they won't all fit in there nor will they be able to take their wealth with them since buildings in Manhattan take years to sell anyway. Jews like Halsey want to stay in America and he has expressed a fierce and honourable willingness to fight for it. I only hope that Halsey will be brave enough to one day invite me on his channel.
I take the view that Jews are not being malign by being liberal, just as stupid and clueless as the liberal gentile.
There are more liberals than nationalists everywhere in the West - both Jew and gentile - because there are more stupid people who believe what they are told and people who prefer to go with the flow, everywhere.
4:30 Is religion at the heart of the clash of civilisations? But of course. The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference.
4:40 What is the nature of the deepening crisis between the West and the Muslim world? Muslims are tired of the West kicking them around, installing puppet regimes in their countries and stealing their oil and resources, probably. Not a good idea to murder Muslims and then let them come into your country.
4:56 Should the war on terror be in quotes? It is obviously a metaphor, but Western degenerates find abstract reasoning increasingly difficult as their degeneracy accelerates.
4:58 What is the nature of Islam and of Christianity? Islam is "Judaism Lite" and in compliance with the Noahide laws while Christianity is absurd and idolatrous because the Doctrine of the Trinity requires Christians to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God which is obviously blasphemous to Jews and Muslims.
5:00 Are Islam and Christianity threats to the other? It is the nature of universalist religions to vie for supremacy.
5:08 Does Islam need to be rescued from extremists? If the West finds certain interpretations of the Koran extremist, then it will have to show these extremist Muslims how it should be done by adopting Islam in the West.
17:00 "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" does not mean sex offenders should not be punished, does it?
What exactly was Scruton's problem with the Book of Joshua? Because it is about war and conquest? This means he fundamentally misunderstands the nature of religion which is to instill morality. The purpose of morality is to keep your group in existence and in good health so it can make successful conquests and land grabs, which is the nature of empire-building. Fancy a Briton not knowing this already!
12:00 The fact that Shakir says he wants America to be Muslim is discussed.
33:00 Shakir challenges neoconservatism. Terrorism is only a poor man's war and there is the Just War concept. If there are just wars, then there must logically and necessarily be just acts of terrorism. No justice, no peace.
41:00 What exactly does Scruton want Muslims to do? Any Muslim can have his or her own interpretation of the Koran. Obviously, whose interpretation will prevail will depend on who wins the argument, or the war.
47:00 The Catholic Church is kaput. There is no prospect of the Catholic Church regaining its moral authority in our lifetimes, even if we were born yesterday. Catholic Ireland fell to gay marriage in 2015. The Anglican Church should be disestablished after Secular Koranism is imposed. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
Gay marriage - that abomination of abominations - is obviously forbidden by the Bible and the Koran. Muslims have a religious duty to enjoin good and forbid evil. Obviously, what the Koran explicitly forbids is evil, and what the Koran commands is good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjoining_good_and_forbidding_wrong
51:00 The question is asked: If Jews can live with secularisation, why not Muslims? Jews are still Jews even if they are bad liberal assimilated Jews because being Jewish also an ethnicity and you cannot change your ethnicity.
Islam is about principles and practice so if you cannot or do not practice your principles, your Islamic identity is compromised. That is the difference.
Judaism is in theory far more restrictive than Islam, and Islam is really "Judaism Lite". It represents the second and final attempt to adopt Judaism for gentiles, simultaneously superseding failed Christianity and providing the solution to its failure. Neat, huh?
We are a matriarchy and this means no one is really in charge. The model patriarchy would be led by an alpha male in control of his family and served by loyal beta males who follow his orders. A matriarchy basically has a leader appointed by immoral women while the preferences of the beta males are ignored and marginalised. This explains why a feature of white nationalism is that it is peopled by unprepossessing lower class beta males who are repulsive to women. In the US, they are called rednecks, in the UK they are called gammon. These men no longer have a leader to represent their interests, which is why they are getting uglier, more marginalised , angrier and more violent, particularly after they have exhausted all the usual channels of having their grievances addressed while what they object to - uncontrolled immigration - continues unabated while Brexit is being blatantly sabotaged in front of their eyes.
Robert Bowers is another Anders Breivik, judging from his demeanour in court when he was being indicted for his murders.
He posted antisemitic material on social media presumably to demand answers, but was dismissed as an antisemite and then ignored.
How many times do you think it happened to him?
Once, when I received no answer to a question and complained, I was told by my uncle "No answer is an answer."
When you have urgent questions and receive no answers, you can deduce the indifference and motives of the people who give you no answers, especially if they denounce and traduce you for even asking them.
Liberals are actually too stupid to formulate arguments or counter-arguments. Therefore their only way of dealing with awkward questions is to traduce and abuse you for asking them. If you use the wrong word or ask the wrong question, your goose is cooked and the shutters come down because no one who is a sexist, racist, antisemite, Islamophobe, Fascist, Nazi or whatever they decided to call you should be engaged with.
When this happens often enough, some people may well feel driven to deal with this non-response in a violent and lethal way, if they are not the type to just forget about it.
After the many lives lost to Breivik in Norway, the Norwegian government decided to dismiss him as insane. Clearly, the Norwegian matriarchy simply decided decided that they would rather just forget about it after declaring him insane. Denial is a feminine vice.
I imagine that the questions Bowers was asking were asking was along the lines of:
1) Why must there be so much immigration if our government knows we hate it?
2) Why doesn't our government care about us?
3) Are the Jews behind this?
4) When will this stop?
5) How could it be stopped?
6) Why are the Jews paying to get more migrants in when they already know gentiles hate it?
7) Why are the Jews still paying to settle more migrants into our country even when they already know that these migrants are mostly antisemitic?
8) Is the reason why these Jews who keep getting more Muslims migrants into our country despite knowing they are antisemitic because they actually want to destroy our civilisation because they hate us so much? (There is HIAS in the US which enraged Robert Bowers into mass murder. In Germany, there are Jews who want the German government to give Muslim migrants special classes on how not to be antisemitic, doubtless at the expense of the gentile German taxpayer.)
What I imagine they fail to understand is that a matriarchy that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers won't care about the concerns of these men and don't care how they show it. Any man who takes their side, like Trump, would be ruthlessly attacked using foulest means and the dirtiest tricks.
There is a reason why the Democrats are behaving like immoral women and the men like the illegitimate sons of these immoral women.
These women think that men of their race who cannot keep out migrants or compete against them successfully do not deserve reproductive rights.
I often wonder how clueless childless European leaders would answer what I imagine are the questions of Breivik or Bowers. There are quite a few of them too:
Germany’s Angela Merkel
France’s Emmanuel Macron
Britain’s Theresa May
Italy’s Paolo Gentilon
Holland’s Mark Rutte
Scotland’s Nicola Sturgeon
Sweden’s Stefan Lofven
Luxembourg’s Xavier Bettel (a homosexual)
Switzerland’s Simonetta Sommaruga
Ireland’s Leo Varadkar (a homosexual)
Obviously the youngest and sexiest of these immoral women who are female voters would be the most indifferent to the concerns and interests of the beta male. The most powerful of them would be the female undergraduates of the elite universities who command the support of thirsty male undergraduates called SJWs. The young and foolish predictably go too far and abuse their power, but their reign is short. The trouble is that they keep being replaced by those even more foolish, ignorant and immoral than they. Even worse, the matriarchy are unaccountable. They will never ever take responsibility for anything and even if you could make them confess to every wrong thing they ever did in their lives, they would say "Well, all right then, but you shouldn't have put us in charge and left us in charge, should you?"
All matriarchies without exception are extinct or about to become extinct. Even if everything I recommend were implemented today, Western civilisation as we know it would end.
Western civilisation is therefore a dead man walking.
Nationalists who make no distinction between assimilated liberal Jews and Orthodox Jews are of course antisemites. I wonder how they would feel if white people in general were identified en masse as being degenerate sex addicts who promote gay marriage because they want to turn our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah.
Of course, it suits their narrative perfectly ie
"Jews are all assimilated turbo-charged liberals and we already have enough trouble with liberals of our own, so make them all go to Israel."
"Muslims are terrorists and sex predators because they are Muslim. Their prophet also married a nine year old girl which makes him a paedophile. Muslims follow a paedo prophet and are paedophiles and terrorists. So kick them out."
In other words, I wonder how white people who hate Jews and Muslims would feel if all white people were treated as if they were liberals and supported gay marriage because their governments have been busily promoting it globally.
Imagine, please, white people, how you would feel if all the other races of the world decided that your presence on earth was a trouble to other earthlings and something had better be done about the way you are spreading the filth of gay marriage all over the world and turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah thereby attracting the same punishment it did.
Before they started with their gay marriage nonsense, they started two World Wars. Not just one, but two World Wars. Not only did they start two World Wars, they nuked Japan twice. Not only did they nuke Japan twice, they nuked two different Japanese cities and killed non-combatants in those cities when they dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now, they are about to start World War 3. Time to tell them where to get off, surely, before they do more damage?
Isn't it almost comical the way white Islamophobes huff and puff about the violence of verses in the Koran that tell Muslims who were not trained soldiers how to disable their enemy by striking at their fingers and throats when they never gave a second thought about nuking the non-combant citizens of two Japanese cities twice without even thinking twice about it?
I am sure the Russians would object at being tarred by the same brush so I won't include them. Therefore there will still be nice non-gay marriage spreading white people on earth after the WASPs have been sent out of the solar system.
Let us imagine that a spaceworthy vessel existed - a bit like a spaceworthy banana boat - that could transport all white but non-Russian people to another habitable planet where they could go spread their filth of gay marriage they all love so much in some other solar system. Let us imagine there were a spaceworthy vessel that all white people on earth could be fitted into which could be launched into space so white could people could be sent on their way before they do more damage by further corrupting the morals of earthlings thereby provoking the wrath of God.
Would it not make sense to send them on their way, my fellow non-white earthings?
The passage from Mein Kampf that I read out that attracted a strike from YouTube:
The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents; but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks to logic, they acted as if they could not under the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point, they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a sold mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to given in to your argument, on account of observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. He would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday's defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me more - the abundance of their privilege or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them.
A category mistake (or category error) is a logical fallacy that occurs when a speaker (knowingly or not) confuses the properties of the whole with the properties of a part. It contains the fallacy of composition (assuming the whole has the properties of the part) and the fallacy of division (assuming the part has the properties of the whole). It is an imprecision fallacy and an informal fallacy.
Examples:
Confusing (knowingly or not) the Muslim immigrants in their country whom they hate with a book they will never read ie the Koran.
Confusing (knowingly or not) Muslim immigrants in their country whom they hate with the terrorists that they fear who have been provoked by the imperialistic foreign policy of their governments.
Confusing (knowingly or not) the consequence of following clear instructions badly or not at all with the correctness of the instruction. (Is your doctor a bad doctor if you do not follow his orders? Is your satnav faulty if you ignore its directions? Is your map wrong if you misread it?)
Confusing (knowingly or not) the symptoms ie immigrants with the disease ie feminism.
***************************************
DESCRIPTION UNDER THE VIDEO
To whom was Hitler referring - Jews or liberals? It is hard to tell, isn't it?
Anyone who has looked into Judaism would know that it is neither Liberalism nor Marxism. Therefore any Jew that was actively promoting Liberalism or Marxism was going against his religious principles and therefore a bad Jew and perhaps guilty of CHILLUL HASHEM (desecration of the name of God) which should attract a punishment called HEREM (censure). For some reason this option is no longer available in the 21st century, probably because Jews have split themselves up into Orthodox and Reform Jews, with the Orthodox telling each other to distance themselves from the Reform variety of Jews.
Perhaps this division between Jews will only be resolved when the governments of the West restore their patriarchy which establishes the rule that the correct behaviour expected of everyone is not to have extramarital sex. This would be a society that privileges married over unmarried parents and treats unmarried parents as sex offenders - a society whose laws support marriage and family values without which a patriarchy cannot exist.
For nationalists who baulk at the prospect, it has to be pointed out that it is only under a patriarchy that enough good strong men would be produced to defend the national interest.
Why, in Europe, are only Poland and Hungary capable of standing up to the European Union and saying NO to unwanted migrants? It is because they still retain their patriarchy, while the rest of Europe is headed by childless female leaders or, in the case of France, a childless male leader whose wife is old enough to be his mother.
Make no mistake: the West is a matriarchy. Make no mistake that Weimar Germany must also have been a matriarchy. (The film Cabaret seems to make this point rather well.)
Situated in Berlin during the Weimar Republic in 1931, under the presence of the growing Nazi Party, the film is loosely based on the 1966 Broadway musical Cabaret by Kander and Ebb, which was adapted from the novel The Berlin Stories / Goodbye to Berlin (1939) by Christopher Isherwood and the 1951 play I Am a Camera adapted from the same book.
It was described by contemporary writer George Orwell as "brilliant sketches of a society in decay".
While you can argue that an observant Jew is nevertheless a Jew, it would be just as wrong for gentiles to tar all Jews with the same liberal brush the way it would be wrong for all non-whites to tar all whites as liberals spreading the abomination of gay marriage all over our global village and punish them harshly, even if most of them are indeed liberal.
The true figure is probably a slight but increasing majority of Western citizens who are nationalists and populists ie Trump supporters and Brexiteers over white people - the liberal elite, always fewer than the non-elite and non-affluent - who hate Trump and want to remain in the EU.
If there are white gentiles who want to blame Jews because of the political activities of liberal and assimilated Jews, should gentile white people who are Conservatives and Nationalists also be tarred with the same liberal brush? Should all white people be lumped together as degenerate sexually liberated liberals who have destroyed the patriarchy just because the majority of white gentiles are indeed liberal? This seems to me to be unfair if we are talking in terms of more than verbal censure being meted out.
While the Conservatives are perhaps to blame for letting things get so out of hand without taking effective action, they should be given a chance to correct themselves before being collectively punished for all the sins of their governments, present and past.
Why do Jews not remind and warn gentiles when they see that gentiles have fallen below these minimum moral standards as it is their duty to do? Probably because the gentile will always get nasty and use his majority to intimidate, persecute, harm and injure people who say things they dislike, especially if they are only a minority who can easily be targeted.
Thus we now live in a society where people are afraid to exercise their right to free speech when it exists officially. What about the media?
Here too is a chance for the media to correct themselves and henceforth cease and desist from suppressing the truth and not reporting the news if it is not in harmony with the liberal narrative. If the media again performed its duty of reporting the truth and what is newsworthy, things might yet be corrected and disaster averted. There can be no peace without justice, and there can be no justice without truth.
*****************************
ATTENTION As you may know, our Community Guidelines describe which content we allow and what we don’t allow on YouTube. Your video "Hitler's category mistake" was flagged for review. Upon review, we’ve determined that it violates our guidelines. We’ve removed it from YouTube and assigned a Community Guidelines strike, or temporary penalty, to your account. Video content restrictions We encourage free speech and defend everyone's right to express their points of view, even if unpopular. However, YouTube doesn't allow hate speech. Sometimes there's a fine line between what is and isn't considered hate speech. If you're not sure whether or not your content crosses the line, we ask that you don't post it. Learn more here. The impact of strikes This is the first strike applied to your account. We understand that users seldom intend to violate our policies. That’s why strikes don’t last forever – this strike will expire in three months. However, it’s important to remember that additional strikes could prevent you from posting content to YouTube or even lead to your account being terminated. How you can respond If you believe this was a mistake, we’d like to hear from you. Please follow both of these steps as simply deleting the video won’t resolve the strike on your account. The next time you sign in you will be asked to acknowledge this strike on your account. If you would like to appeal this strike, please submit this form. Our team will thoroughly review your appeal and will contact you again very soon.
MY APPEAL TO YOUTUBE AGAINST THE STRIKE:
"I was pointing out that HITLER MADE AN ERROR in conflating Jews with liberals. Or are you saying that Hitler cannot be mentioned at all?"
The matriarchy and its lady judge Lady Hale have uninvented marriage but the men are incapable of even thinking of restoring the patriarchy. They are indifferent, silent and cowed. To them marriage is a sacrifice they no longer wish to make because they know they are unmarriageable. These degenerates no longer even have the masculinity to propose that marriage be made a better deal for men who want to become fathers of legitimate children whom they wish to properly parent.
What could be easier to do and say than to propose the abolition of no fault divorce which penalises the wealthier partner when he has done no wrong?
But these emasculated unmarriageable men instead prefer to waste their energy and time campaigning to ban male circumcision because they already know they are unmarriageable. Their game is to somehow benefit from the fact that most atheist antisemitic Islamophobic and sexually liberated gentiles resent Jews and Muslims and want to make them feel uncomfortable and unwelcome. The fact that freedom of belief is a Western liberal tradition means nothing to them. You cannot expect the degenerate to grasp and apply a principle much less adhere to it, after all.
They are to a man shameless atheists, nihilists, cowards and cattle whose main purpose is to enjoy as much sexual and sensual pleasure as they can before they pop their clogs.
Their other main purpose is to go to their grave with the belief that they, their ancestors, their government and their Christianity and liberal democracy were absolutely and perfectly wise and right about everything, until the Jews and Muslims came and ruined everything.
It is a sign of irrationality and lunacy to harbour two contradictory and mutually exclusive ideas in your mind while claiming to have won the argument and then closing your eyes and ears.
Such men and their civilisation can have no future. Nationalists who think in these terms are by definition nihilists. The people they hate and fear - Jews and Muslims in particular - however, are not.
Which is worse? To know you are definitely lost or to not even know you are lost?
National identity is forged in the furnace of war and revolution. How else does one form of national identity replace another? Religion and political ideology (and change thereof as well as the culture produced by religion and politics) is the only source of national self-consciousness.
What is self-consciousness in the philosophical sense? When we realise we are different to other people and know for a fact that our interests are different to theirs. We know we are different to other people when we do things differently to other people for special reasons of our own. Jews are a good example of a people with a very developed by sense of group identity.
Democracy, liberalism and feminism are the sacred cows of the West. The consequence of this unholy trinity is that it leads to matriarchy, and a matriarchy is a primitive, declining and extinct society, or one that is about to become extinct. All the five world religions anyone has ever heard of is about protecting the patriarchy and promoting marriage and family values. Once your government stops doing that, you will become a matriarchy.
White men no longer wishing to live in a matriarchy saying they are tired of suffering the consequences of uncontrolled immigration seems a perfectly respectable political aspiration to me.
If asked whether your race or religion is more important to you, how would you answer? Only if you are an observant Jew could you honestly answer that both are logically and necessarily equally important.
What bemuses me about white supremacists about their racial superiority is their inability to go with the logic of racial superiority. The following questions should occur to the thinking racist:
1) If racial superiority exists, does it really only rest on the colour of one's skin?
2) If racial superiority is not just about the colour of one's skin, does it rest on military, social, economic, political and moral superiority?
3) If racial superiority rests on military superiority, then racial superiority rests on science and technology upon which perceived social, economic and political and moral superiority rests.
4) The question of how military superiority is gained must be asked. It seems to me that this was kick-started by the Industrial Revolution which was all about selling stuff everyone round the world wanted to buy, and how to make them most profitably and cheaply, which was what science and technology was all about. Obviously, with all the SSMs (Slut Single Mothers) and variously fathered and badly parented illegitimate offspring that state schools have to take, you cannot expect this tradition to be kept up, particularly when one of the two parties of government refuse to countenance selective education, and this hurts the working classes by depriving them of the opportunity to better themselves.
5) It is your culture that enables you to maintain your military superiority. The Pyrrhic victories of WW1 and WW2 over Germany only sent the British into a tailspin of social unrest. After WW1 there was the General Strike of 1925, when the working classes felt they had died like flies in the Great War for nothing very much. Mosley's attempt to correct the situation failed, because what he wanted to do was correct the political system itself, proposing to abolish the Upper House and replacing it with Fascist Corporatism and a pruned Lower House. Instead of being more careful about whom they went to war with, the British thought they would finish the job with Germany in WW2. Again, they failed, but this time decided to let their hair down and everything hang out with their welfare state and their swinging. This accelerated their degeneracy and explains how they have got to the pretty pass of white men now being helpless against a Muslim invasion and their women totally out of control and hating them.
The BUF was anti-communist and protectionist, and proposed replacing parliamentary democracy with executives elected to represent specific industries, trades or other professional interest groups—a system similar to the corporatism of the Italian fascists. Unlike the Italian system, British fascist corporatism planned to replace the House of Lords with elected executives drawn from major industries, the clergy, and colonies. The House of Commons was to be reduced to allow for a faster, "less factionist" democracy.
Am I alone in thinking that on the whole Mosley's proposals for reform seem sensible enough?
6) Culture is really the practices that the law allows, and the law is a reflection of whatever the current political orthodoxy - a mixture of religion and political tradition - permits. So now we approach again my pet theory, which is that Christianity has failed. Christianity has obviously failed because it has not protected the foolish British from their avoidable folly of following their ridiculous liberalism and the brain-numbing stupidity of their idolatrous Christianity. All the things they could have done to avoid the folly of declaring two World Wars on Germany would have been prevented by Islam as well as the post-war self-indulgence of not parenting their children properly and sinking into a culture of wine, women and song leading to the progressive (pun intended) enfeeblement of mind, body and spirit.
Returning to the subject of racial superiority, it does appear that racial superiority is only military superiority and military superiority is obtained by the happenstance of history eg the Industrial Revolution, an unplanned population explosion, and geopolitics. It is obvious that racial superiority is not permanent and relies on the rules one practices in one's racial group. Even Hitler did not assume that the Germans were so superior and perfect that they need do nothing more other than to marinate in their racial superiority. Indeed, he could be said to be urging Germans to strive and fight in order to become superior or perhaps just as good as the British. He was probably content with being just as good with what everyone thought were the masters of the universe of the time, the British.
Assuming that you are a racist who believes in the concept of racial superiority, the next question is to ask yourself must be "Who is the most racially superior race of all?" The Romans were once racially superior because they were militarily superior, but when they declined they eventually lost their culture of producing soldiers to conquer other lands, and lost the taste for conquest, sinking into decadence, wine, women and song. Why, a Roman emperor even changed his religion in an attempt to arrest decline. In the end, Rome was sacked, and the Roman Empire is no more. You cannot be racially superior to anyone if you no longer even exist.
Who, then, is racially superior? Not the Europeans in the great scheme of things, I'm afraid, simply because military superiority does not last forever, as I have easily demonstrated with the Romans, if you do not inculcate a culture, political system or maintain a religion that perpetuates it. You may technically be at the top of the tree, but you may just fall off if you suffer a dizzy spell it even if no one pulls you off.
To be racially superior one has to satisfy the condition of being in existence and of at the very least holding territory. Racial superiority does not necessarily rest on numbers, but numbers help if you are in the business of acquiring more territory. Israeli Zionist Jews are insisting that they have no imperial ambitions and simply want to live in Israel in peace. The Chinese already have enough on their plate and have for centuries been sucking their pencils on the question of their proper relationship with the rest of the world.
The top dogs of racial superiority are Jews and Chinese, simply because they have been around so long. I would award the top prize to the Jews, because they at least have bothered to write things down properly in their scripture and had a head start. Unlike the Chinese, Jews also had the perspicacity to attribute their survival to their God, to stop themselves from becoming too big-headed.
According to the Chinese calendar it is the year 4715. According to the Hebrew calendar it is the year 5778.
Now that we know that Jews are racially superior, we have to ask ourselves why they are racially superior. Clearly, it is their religion. Clearly, their religion is so obviously superior that two of the most famous attempts to adapt Judaism for gentiles are universally acknowledged to be Christianity and Islam. Christianity is now kaput, so the next religion of the West has to be Islam. It is really as a simple as an arithmetical problem. You have 3. You take 2 away and have 1 left. The one left is Islam, and the answer is the answer even if you don't like it.
My hypothesis can even be mathematically proven if we can agree that what made Britain great was the fact that it was the first nation in the world to have a world empire.
How did they lose their empire? The most proximate cause was WW2. It has been said by A J P Taylor that WW2 was a continuation of WW1. Why did the British declare war on Germany in WW1? Because the Liberal PM Asquith thought a short successful war would make him more likely to win the General Election of 1915. Imagine, losing your world empire because the Liberal Party wanted to win an election that was subsequently cancelled! You would have thought that the British by now would have realised their error or could have accepted Mosley's attempt to correct it, but what their political leaders lacked in wisdom was equalled and exceeded by their stubborn pride and chauvinism.
It is easily provable that the great upheavals suffered by the British would have been easily avoided if they had been Muslim and followed the Koran. The Koran only allows defensive wars and neither WW1 nor WW2 could by any stretch of the imagination be called defensive. British foreign policy was impelled primarily by a dog in the manger attitude towards Germany because it saw Germany as a rival and a threat. It is the equivalent of a foolish Monopoly player buying up properties he didn't want just to prevent his opponent from completing his set and bankrupting himself in the process and not being able to make the most of any opportunities he landed on, because he was mortgaged to the hilt.
Now they are the poodle of Uncle Sam and remain a vassal state of the EU, with approximately half its citizens begging to retain this status and its male MPs too terrified to question the parasitic nature of feminism for fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence. How are the mighty fallen.
What is the sex of the Prime Minister?
What is the sex of the Home Secretary?
What is the sex of the Commissioner of Police?
What is the sex of the Director of Public Prosecutions?
What is the sex of the Chairman of the Bar Council?
What is the sex of the Director General of the CBI?
Is the Archbishop of Canterbury a bastard?
Has Peter Hitchens called himself a feminist?
Is Roger Scruton, the Conservative Philosopher, too afraid of his wife to challenge feminism?
Is Philip Davies MP, who used to challenge feminism too afraid to continuing doing so now because the feminazis have got him by the goolies?
What is the very least your religion should be doing?
Supporting marriage and the family.
This is what all the five world religions have in common.
Oh, and telling the truth, behaving honourably so men can co-operate with each other to defeat the internal and external enemies of their nation.
The eternal enemies of society and civilisation are sluts and socialists.
Patriarchy must therefore be regarded as the foundation of all civilisations. When your national religion no longer sanctifies marriage, it must be regarded as having failed.
How do you know when your religion no longer sanctifies marriage?
When your society is no longer a patriarchy.
How do you know when your society is no longer a patriarchy?
When your government no longer prioritises the preferences of married fathers and instead panders to the female voter which means it has become a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who are the bad parents of their illegitimate children who will not grow into productive citizens but become the adult criminals of the future.
No other country has over 85 per cent of babies born to unmarried mothers and over 50 per cent without registered fathers. No other country routinely discusses parenthood in such relationship neutral terms as 'baby father' and 'baby mother'. No other country so readily accepts absent fatherhood or brings up children so carelessly. And no other country not at war has such a high murder rate.
A question occurs to me: has the West corrupted the morals of the Jew? Or has the Jew corrupted the morals of the gentile?
I suspect this question will be unanswerable, since neither will want to take the blame for corrupting each other's morals.
The Jew will say "But of course your laws corrupted our morals because we are only a minority in the land of the gentile."
The gentile will say "Of course you corrupted us, because many of you are in senior positions in politics, academia, the professions as well as banking. Your numbers may be few but your influence great indeed, being God's Chosen People who are so clever and cunning."
Understandably, atheist sexually liberated gentiles will have their morals easily corrupted by bad Jews, and bad Jews are unobservant assimilated and sexually liberated Jews.
Another unanswerable question is whether it was Eve who was to blame for leading Adam astray, or Adam for being so weak-willed as to be so easily led astray.
I think the answer must be that God was tired of Adam and Eve getting under His feet, raiding His fridge, smoking His stash, playing loud music and was just looking for an excuse to kick them out of Eden. He therefore used reverse psychology to give them the rope He knew they would take to hang themselves, so to speak.
I like to think that once the West has its one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism as I hope will happen one day, Jews will be better Jews, Christians better Christians, Muslims better Muslims and even atheists relatively well-behaved. It is only through practising moral restraint that men can keep their women relatively under control, re-establish the patriarchy and regenerate a degenerate civilisation.
9:00 Women in the workplace got John Collins sacked from his job.
28:00 John Collins thinks Millennial Woes had a girlfriend who was complaining about him to a male friend of hers who was looking to move in on her. This man will be her next victim, he thinks.
31:00 Depression and Millennial Woes.
33:00 Women who say "I need a new husband/car/house/holiday etc" and get one but are still miserable when they get it.
43:00 John Collins: "If feminism were given its proper name, feminism is the borderline personality disorder acceptance movement."
49:00 John Collins disputes the claim of Millennial Woes that the academic left are planning the destruction of the West. Greg Johnson prepared to use the death of anyone at a demonstration to further the message of the alt-right.
50:00 "Violence will be seen as the only solution if .... "
52:00 Millennial Woes not prepared to discuss how civic nationalism can get ethno-nationalists what they want.
53:00 John Collins comments on Millennial Woes' position on National Socialism.
54:00 Pogroms All the countries who conduct them feel sheepish about them afterwards.
55:00 John Collins: "There is no political will for a white ethno-state."
58:00 THOUGHTCRIME and the Equality Act 2010
59:00 John Collins says he has been demonetised because he is a friend of Matt Forney.
1:00 Jews have been around for longer than the Chinese.
1:05 The failure of Christianity in maintaining morality in the West
1:06 Islam is about making the rules clear.
1:07 Jews and Muslims respect marriage and the family, Muslims in Rochdale.
1:13 Narcissism
1:16 Religion and the narcissist eg LGBTs
1:17 Homosexuality and child abuse
1:21 Nostalgia, the narcissist, Millennial Woes and Manichaeism
1:40 According to John Collins, Millennial Woes is simplistic, childlike, dangerous to young people appealing to their sense of victimhood and in and out group preferences. His leadership qualities are also untried. Race war, Rochdale, child abuser who lived across the road from John Collins who operated in the 1980s and went on in the 1970s, dirty mac flashers, Cyril Smith, KGB, CIA, MI5. Muslims gangs simply exploited this state of affairs that had been going on for decades. Gillick Competence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillick_competence Under-age sex.
1:51 While John Collins was having his heart attack, suppressed memories from his childhood surfaced. "The things you don't do shape the person you are." 15 and 16 year old girls blackmailing a drug dealer, his niece and her classmates, cat-fishing and blackmailing men who had unknowingly had underage sex with them. Sex with 27 men.
2:00 Millennial Woes plays the victim to elicit sympathy to manipulate you into protecting him and his race - a feminine stratagem. Millennial Woes is more dangerous than Richard Spencer as a recruiter. John Collins says Millennial Woes is like Fagin. Followers of Millennial Woes drawn to the alt-right because they are drawn to father figures and strong men, having been deprived of their fathers by their mothers.
2:05 John Collins: "Millennial Woes is not that self aware. He is being seen as a father figure by a generation of lost boys."
2:08 Greg Johnson says he is hedonist, according to John Collins.
