Translate

Showing posts with label Ann Coulter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ann Coulter. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 June 2020

My 14 questions for Ann Coulter that I hope the Barnett Literary Agency will forward to her

https://www.barnettmarcom.com/announcing-the-rebirth-of-the-barnett-literary-agency/

I trust you will forward these questions to Ann Coulter.

1.  Is Christianity kaput?

2.  If Christianity is kaput, does it need to be replaced?

3.  If Christianity needs to be replaced, by what religion should it be replaced?

4.  Have you read the Koran? If not, would you be prepared to read it for the purpose of comparative religion?

5.  Are you aware that the First Amendment is based on 2:256 of the Koran? quran.com/2/256

6.  What was Jefferson's purpose in compiling the Jefferson Bible?

7.  If God revealed the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles, doesn't this make Christianity obsolete, being a provably illegitimate, idolatrous and blasphemous religion according to the Ten Commandments which forbade idolatry and blasphemy?

8.  Does Christianity suffer from having  an inferior scripture?

9.  Is the Doctrine of the Trinity ipso facto idolatrous?

10.  What could be more blasphemous to Jews than for gentiles to worship a Jew found guilty of their capital crime of blasphemy and claim he is the co-equal of the God that they worship?

11.  Are you aware that Jews are allowed to enter mosques but not churches?

12.  Are you aware that Muslims are commanded by God to admonish those who claim God has begotten a Son by 18:4 of the Koran? quran.com/18/4

13.  Are you concerned about the implications for your civilisation if Christianity is indeed idolatrous and blasphemous, as Jews and Muslims believe?

14.  Do you really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God?

Friday, 21 December 2018

Why the West is losing its marbles and what is to be done about this



The matriarchy knows it cannot win arguments on the basis of truth, logic and morality alone. I do hope you will be discussing the effects of men denying that they live in a matriarchy.

You live in a matriarchy if the number of illegitimate births are approaching or are over half the number of legitimate births. You know this is the case in the West.

Western men fear to challenge feminism because they already know that their womenfolk are overwhelmingly feminist.

You are a feminist if even if you are a man complaining about feminism and feminists unless you also condemn fornication.

No man will publicly condemn fornication because there are too many vested interests eg men who wish to have sex with women they are not married to, men who are already having sex with women they are not married to, men who have fornicating daughters, men who used to fornicate, men who have gay sons, men whose associates have already been condoning extramarital sex and underage sex for decades.

Last, but not least, is big pharma who manufacture the contraceptive pill and of course those with shares invested in big pharma.

This is pretty much everyone really in the West and also in Russia.

Feminism is a disease of the mind and I would only be too happy to explain why it is destroying Western civilisation if given the opportunity.

We know that it is overwhelmingly women who vote for the left. Ann Coulter herself said so.

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html

The average Western voter is a 40 year old single mother whom all political parties pander to. This explains why no one cares about foreign policy. You must understand that the national character in democracies can be easily determined by working out the average age of the nation and deciding which sex wields more power.

A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of the unmarried mother, usually with variously fathered illegitimate offspring whom she badly parents.

https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide


Why the West is sucking in foreign workers from around the world because the class supposed to constitute its own labour force is degenerate, incompetent, uncompetitive and unwilling to work because it can claim welfare. 

The Welfare State is another Sacred Cow that must be slain.

We live in an Idiocracy because we live in a matriarchy. The matriarchy is not only dangerous to the patriarchy, it will also destroy itself after it has destroyed the patriarchy.

If we condone widespread bastardy, we are basically saying it is OK for the next generation to be parented by an immoral and irresponsible stupid woman who is in fact a sex offender and should be treated as such.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/blogs/sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html

The only political ideology that can now shame these shameless women that their men are now too afraid to criticise of is the one with a holy book that has the verse at https://quran.com/24/2

 If you are in a burning building but are too afraid of your sacred cows that you know are blocking the exits and the windows, you will die in it, unless you remove those obstructions.

You know you must remove those obstructions or at least talk about removing those obstructions, man to man.Once you agree that this must be done, simply convey the message to the US President by promising him your support in the slaying of these sacred cows.

That would be the quickest non-violent way of restoring the patriarchy.

There are too many entitled middle class female undergraduates in universities. Male undergraduates who seek sexual access to these females will commit violence to gain access to these women by flattering them and committing violence to impress these women.

Intersectional Feminism which Lionel alluded to is not mentioned specifically, but has been identified by Alan M. Dershowitz as threatening to the Jew.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism

There is only one religion that guarantees freedom of belief by implicitly declaring thoughtcrime legislation as unIslamic.

https://quran.com/2/256

The Church has been entirely subverted by feminists and liberals.

Monday, 19 November 2018

My structural, religious, gender and class analysis of White Identity and the competing groups within it


WASPs (White Anglo Saxon Protestants) used to be the Top White Guys.

This means Catholics came below WASPs.

Since White Guys both Protestant and Catholic stopped taking their religion seriously, Jews and White Women are now above White Gentile Post-Christian Atheist Men.

Only Islam will allow white men to take back control from their women and minorities now.

Now a non-denominational Christian ie Presbyterian has become POTUS of the most powerful nation in the world.

The thing to note about Presbyterians is that they are the most socially conservative group of Christians. My favourite White Nationalist Ann Coulter is also a Presbyterian.

Another thing we should note is that mosques are run on the same basis as the Presbyterian Church ie on the basis of the congregation choosing its elders. This explains why Presbyterians remain more socially conservative ie "right-wing" than cucked Episcopalianism and Catholicism which are ruled from the top and suffer from a overly-centralised hierarchy. Centralisation and Papal Infallibility is fine when you have an infallible Papal leader, but not OK when the head has rotted.

Are you guys getting the idea now?

Anglicanism was based on copying Catholicism and suffers from the same structural defects of administration.

The social conservatism of mosques and Presbyterianism came from the elders giving the congregation what they wanted.

There is no point even thinking of converting the West to Presbyterianism because its supporters are too few and its base too small.

If you want to regenerate the West, you would have to adopt Islam to impose the social conservatism necessary to bring about male solidarity and with it the male cooperation necessary to deal with your internal and external enemies.


One of the best bits is when Michael Voris had to say very firmly to Kathy Spangler, the newly appointed Director of Communications of Bishop Malone: "Stop touching me!" 

Tuesday, 23 October 2018

Cherchez la femme to discover the cause of Western Man's neurosis and dementia

I am inviting people to consider whether married women who want to normalise bastardy could be said to be respectable.

Is a woman who does not want to restore the patriarchy and wants to normalise bastardy morally respectable?

Is the woman who does not want to restore the patriarchy a feminist?

Have feminists not declared their intention of destroying the patriarchy?

Is feminism a morally respectable political ideology, or just a disease of the mind that can only be rooted out by slut-shaming as prescribed by quran.com/24/2?

Everything about feminism undermines marriage, does it not?

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, are they not?

All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies, are they not?

Patriarchies are societies that prioritise the preferences of married fathers, are they not?

Matriarchies are societies that prioritise the preferences of unmarried mothers, are they not?

The link between bastardy and criminality is well-established, is it not?

https://rightwingnews.com/top-news/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty

Can someone who prefers her society to remain a degenerate and declining matriarchy of rising crime and widespread bastardy rather than a patriarchy of law and order possibly be morally respectable?

If woman is not morally respectable because she wants to normalise bastardy, then she must be an immoral woman, mustn't she?

Is there any reason at all to not dismiss the views of immoral women who want to normalise bastardy because they want their society to remain a degenerate matriarchy suffering from uncontrolled immigration and rising crime who do not give a damn about the men of their nation because they are now shacked up with an affluent man and are one of the ladies who lunch and want to normalise bastardy?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-22/middle-class-destroyed-50-all-american-workers-make-less-30533-year

Are these women married to affluent and powerful men who want to normalise bastardy invariably the unthinking supporters of neoconservatism and neoliberalism, who cannot be reasoned with?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherchez_la_femme

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Monday, 25 June 2018

Alt Right Torah: Parasha Balak (Num. 22-25)




I first appear from the 26th minute on the proposal to male circumcision and Rabbi Sacks not promoting the Noahide laws as his great hero the late Rabbi Schneerson said Jews must, "by force or by more peaceful means".
http://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2018/04/rabbi-bassous-calls-all-jews-with-flame.html


And again at 1:25 on YouTube free speech rules.

From 2:14 I propose ways of dealing with the problem voters wanting their GIBs.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gib

From 2:20 on female voters voting for left-wing parties. I repeat Ann Coulter's point.

http://rightwingnews.com/top-news/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/

http://humanevents.com/2012/07/18/ann-coulter-democrats-ideal-voter-illegal-alien-single-mother-convicted-felon/

http://www.theweek.co.uk/94224/why-iq-levels-are-falling

Tuesday, 10 April 2018

The totalitarian matriarchy of the West is systematically cultivating failure with intersectional feminism and a feminist foreign policy




https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alan-dershowitz-intersectionality-is-a-code-word-for-anti-semitism

centreforfeministforeignpolicy.org/the-cffp-team
Why feminism is against the national interest

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3376846/Five-years-jail-men-emotionally-bully-wives-New-law-target-bullies-control-partners-coercive-controlling-behaviour.html#ixzz44WS6SqIU


ON OUR CONFLICTING LOYALTIES AND HOW TO RESOLVE THEM TO SORT THE WHEAT OF HUMANITY FROM ITS CHAFF

We all have conflicting loyalties, to our country, religion, race, sex, friends, family etc.

The most basic one is between men and women, but that is wrong too, because there should be a moral factor involved in this ideological battle.

The starkest way to frame this culture war is between men and women who are interested in the proper parenting of their legitimate offspring, and those who are not.

It would be in the national interest to privilege married parents over unmarried parents to encourage good parenting.

My view is that anyone in favour of patriarchy should be supported whatever their sex, race or religion.

So even if you are an antisemitic and Islamophobic white nationalist you should consider supporting the replacement of Christianity with another religion capable of maintaining morality if you really interested in saving your race and nation.

If you are an Islamophobic Jew, you should consider promoting Secular Koranism if only to raise the moral standards of the Western country you and your ancestors have lived for generations so that it does not become a failed state.

I say Islam because there is no other religion or ideology strong enough to kill feminism dead.

Anti-feminist Karaite Jew encourages mosque attendance

Karaite Jew recommends Islam for atheists to better fight feminism

Jew prescribing Islam for gentiles satirises white nationalists

If Islam is Judaism Lite, then Secular Koranism is Islam Lite.

Secular Koranism is not a belief system, but a legal system.

You can be an atheist, agnostic, Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist as well as a Muslim as long as you acknowledge that marriage must be supported by the law and sluts and slut-fuckers shamed.

There will however be no bedroom police so in practice you will get away with it if you are not a parent of illegitimate offspring. However, if you do, the tariff is 100 lashes per bastard.

quran.com/24/2 would send a very clear message out to women not to be sluts to stop them pumping out bastards who will become the criminals and Idiocracy of the next generation.

Once this law is in place, our male politicians will stop pandering to female voters. 

Indiscriminate universal suffrage undermines marriage and patriarchy

The average voter in the West is a female voter, and the average female voter expresses herself in these terms egged on by men who pander to them



Only then would the pro-patriarchy people become powerful enough to win. Those who cannot even bring themselves to say sluts should be shamed and extramarital sex discouraged should not be considered marriageable until unless they formally renounce these views. 

Such people should be marginalised because they are not interested in the parenting of the next generation. People who cannot even bring themselves to pay lip service to marriage are by definition unmarriageable.

Jewish wisdom on what is happening to the shrinking and senescent West

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim discusses the childless leaders of Europe and asks what this phenomenon means for the future of the West.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/dying-europes-leaders-have-no-children/news-story/9e0106b5ea1a6d05e39a57caf883db5d

THE PROBLEM WITH GENDER RELATIONS

The problem: men prefer their women to be kind and stupid. Women trying to attract male partners feel they have to pretend to be kind and stupid. Men factor this in when choosing a female partner and this is fine as long as women wield no political power, but when they do, kind and stupid women being generous to groups that threaten men's interests (eg sluts, socialists, illegal immigrants) at the expense of men of their own race and nationality would be disastrous to these men's interests.


THE PROBLEM OF INFANTILISED MEN AND WOMEN AND WHAT TO DO WITH THEM

The truth is often called ugly. People who cannot cope with the truth should be treated as children and the vote withdrawn from them.

Tuesday, 29 August 2017

My modest proposal for the alt-right and a suggestion for Steve Bannon

The alt-right should now divide itself into:

1) ethno-nationalists some of whom enjoy dressing up as Nazis who want to conduct a pogrom against Jews, Muslims and non-white citizens in the West

Greg Johnson:

The Jewish question is not distinct from ethnonationalism. It is ethnonationalism applied to Jews. Thus no ethnonationalist is entitled to abstain from it. Once one recognizes that Jews are a distinct people, the ethnonationalist solution to the Jewish question is Jewish nationalism, i.e., Zionism.

Of course many White Nationalists have a whole lot more to say about Jews than merely observing that they are a different people. I have argued that the fate of White Nationalism does not depend one way or another on the outcome of historical debates about the holocaust. But I do believe that Jews are not just different from whites, but powerful and malevolent enemies who bear significant responsibility for causing white decline and opposing white renewal.

Some White Nationalists don’t want to hear it. But even so, as I have argued here, they still have to face up to the Jewish question. Because if Jews are nothing more than a distinct people, then ethnonationalists must conclude that Jews belong in their own homeland, not in ours. It is as simple as that.

https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/reframing-the-jewish-question/

2) libertarian anti-feminist civic nationalists who reject neoconservatism and neo-liberalism who only want to expel illegal immigrants eg Ann Coulter.

My elegant solution means respectable and reasonable people can join the civic nationalist faction of the alt-right, including Jews, Christians, Muslims and socially conservative non-whites who are already citizens in the West.

Option 2 is probably the only way of saving the Trump presidency peacefully.

The best way of achieving this is to get the alt-right to divide along these lines and then choose a leader to represent the respective factions. I wonder which faction Steve Bannon would like to lead.

Saturday, 10 June 2017

Not only should there be Muslim Space Spaces, there should be Terrorist Safe Spaces too


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-40198145

This is such an excellent idea! 

I would suggest we go further and have Terrorist Safe Spaces so people contemplating committing acts of terrorism because they are convinced that their government is evil, insane or are really "pod people" can be soothed by trained politicians and psychiatrists.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_the_Body_Snatchers

The apprehension that we are being governed by imbeciles, lunatics and knaves or just incompetent women promoted beyond their ability is not confined only to Muslims, I'm sure. Remember, not all terrorists are Muslims. Some terrorists are Islamophobes and nationalists eg Anders Breivik, Thomas Mair.

Tucker Carlson should think again and invite Ann Coulter to discuss this.  

Friday, 18 November 2016

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils

'The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.
One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "If only," they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen."

Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.'

OUR POST-TRUTH SOCIETY

But how can you exercise this supreme function of statesmanship in a post-truth society? A post-truth society is a matriarchy, and a matriarchy is dominated by stupid immoral women and the male politicians who pander to them in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage, terrified of alienating the female vote and accused of "mansplaining". These immoral and irresponsible women will not be moved by truth, logic or morality, only by false promises, threats and lies. They respond only to fear of punishment, prospect of gain and are bribed with legislation to protect and privilege them, giving them more rights on the public purse that only increase the voracity of their parasitism.

People deserve the government they get. Please, God, let us no longer be the stinking degenerate matriarchy that we already are.

Deuteronomy 28: Curses for Disobedience

15 However, if you do not obey the Lord your God and do not carefully follow all his commands and decrees I am giving you today, all these curses will come on you and overtake you:
16 You will be cursed in the city and cursed in the country.
17 Your basket and your kneading trough will be cursed.
18 The fruit of your womb will be cursed, and the crops of your land, and the calves of your herds and the lambs of your flocks.
19 You will be cursed when you come in and cursed when you go out.
20 The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him.[a] 21 The Lord will plague you with diseases until he has destroyed you from the land you are entering to possess. 22 The Lord will strike you with wasting disease, with fever and inflammation, with scorching heat and drought, with blight and mildew, which will plague you until you perish. 23 The sky over your head will be bronze, the ground beneath you iron. 24 The Lord will turn the rain of your country into dust and powder; it will come down from the skies until you are destroyed.
25 The Lord will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth. 26 Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away. 27 The Lord will afflict you with the boils of Egypt and with tumors, festering sores and the itch, from which you cannot be cured. 28 The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. 29 At midday you will grope about like a blind person in the dark. You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you.
30 You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and rape her. You will build a house, but you will not live in it. You will plant a vineyard, but you will not even begin to enjoy its fruit. 31 Your ox will be slaughtered before your eyes, but you will eat none of it. Your donkey will be forcibly taken from you and will not be returned. Your sheep will be given to your enemies, and no one will rescue them. 32 Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand. 33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days. 34 The sights you see will drive you mad. 35 The Lord will afflict your knees and legs with painful boils that cannot be cured, spreading from the soles of your feet to the top of your head.
36 The Lord will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your ancestors. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone. 37 You will become a thing of horror, a byword and an object of ridicule among all the peoples where the Lord will drive you.
38 You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it. 39 You will plant vineyards and cultivate them but you will not drink the wine or gather the grapes, because worms will eat them. 40 You will have olive trees throughout your country but you will not use the oil, because the olives will drop off. 41 You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity. 42 Swarms of locusts will take over all your trees and the crops of your land.
43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail.
45 All these curses will come on you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the Lord your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you. 46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever. 47 Because you did not serve the Lord your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity, 48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the Lord sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you.
49 The Lord will bring a nation against you from far away, from the ends of the earth, like an eagle swooping down, a nation whose language you will not understand, 50 a fierce-looking nation without respect for the old or pity for the young. 51 They will devour the young of your livestock and the crops of your land until you are destroyed. They will leave you no grain, new wine or olive oil, nor any calves of your herds or lambs of your flocks until you are ruined. 52 They will lay siege to all the cities throughout your land until the high fortified walls in which you trust fall down. They will besiege all the cities throughout the land the Lord your God is giving you.
53 Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you. 54 Even the most gentle and sensitive man among you will have no compassion on his own brother or the wife he loves or his surviving children, 55 and he will not give to one of them any of the flesh of his children that he is eating. It will be all he has left because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of all your cities. 56 The most gentle and sensitive woman among you—so sensitive and gentle that she would not venture to touch the ground with the sole of her foot—will begrudge the husband she loves and her own son or daughter 57 the afterbirth from her womb and the children she bears. For in her dire need she intends to eat them secretly because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege of your cities.
58 If you do not carefully follow all the words of this law, which are written in this book, and do not revere this glorious and awesome name—the Lord your God— 59 the Lord will send fearful plagues on you and your descendants, harsh and prolonged disasters, and severe and lingering illnesses. 60 He will bring on you all the diseases of Egypt that you dreaded, and they will cling to you. 61 The Lord will also bring on you every kind of sickness and disaster not recorded in this Book of the Law, until you are destroyed. 62 You who were as numerous as the stars in the sky will be left but few in number, because you did not obey the Lord your God. 63 Just as it pleased the Lord to make you prosper and increase in number, so it will please him to ruin and destroy you. You will be uprooted from the land you are entering to possess.
64 Then the Lord will scatter you among all nations, from one end of the earth to the other. There you will worship other gods—gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your ancestors have known. 65 Among those nations you will find no repose, no resting place for the sole of your foot. There the Lord will give you an anxious mind, eyes weary with longing, and a despairing heart. 66 You will live in constant suspense, filled with dread both night and day, never sure of your life. 67 In the morning you will say, “If only it were evening!” and in the evening, “If only it were morning!”—because of the terror that will fill your hearts and the sights that your eyes will see. 68 The Lord will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

"God does not change the lot of a people unless they change what is in their hearts." Koran 13:11

"O you who believe! surely from among your wives and your children there is an enemy to you; therefore beware of them; and if you pardon and forbear and forgive, then surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." Koran 64:14

"Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators, and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners." The Book of Common Prayer

"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as a healthy man is of his bones. But if you break a nation’s nationality it will think of nothing else but getting it set again."  George Bernard Shaw

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." 
"Out of the corruption of SLUTS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." 
"Out of the corruption of TOLERATING SLUTS AND BASTARDS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." The Bhagavad Gita

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties



Listen to the superb intellectual sparring between Frost and Powell in 1969. It couldn't happen now, could it? The British in 1969 had Frost. In 2016 they have Evan Davis, who is gaily married, pretending Donald Trump has incestuous intentions towards his daughter, who was then ticked off by an American woman for taking things literally. I still remember Weekend World on LWT when it was presented by Brian Walden and Matthew Parris - an hour-long programme during which issues could be properly thrashed out instead of the pap we now have. The short interviews we now have is intended to cover up the fact that our politicians these days are clueless unprincipled twerps who prefer to be told what to do, and to do it without being questioned too much.






In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?


Monday, 14 November 2016

Are we being too hard on white supremacists?

http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/11/14/sean-hannity-there-outright-false-lying-narrative-steve-bannon-white-supremacist/214443

I think technically you have to say and believe that white people are better than other races of people just because they are white to be a white supremacist.

Is there a difference between being a white supremacist and a white nationalist? These terms are used as terms of abuse by liberals who them use interchangeably for anyone in America who objects to immigration.

Is any white American who says America First a white supremacist?

Is Ann Coulter an American Nationalist?

As she is white, does that make her a White Nationalist?

If she believes in America First, does that turn her into a White Supremacist?

I don't care. I still love her anyway and it gladdens my heart to see and hear my favourite American woman. 

What is the ideology of the White Nationalist and what are White Nationalist polices?

What is the ideology of the White Supremacist and what are White Supremacist policies?

Are there any fundamental differences between the two? If so, what? Extermination? Expulsion? Enslavement? Segregation?

My relations with white men who identify with nationalism have been on the whole perfectly cordial. If they feel infinitely superior to me because of their race, they have not been crass enough to show it in a way that I noticed while in their company.

I suppose it is technically true that white people as a race are more powerful than brown, black or yellow peoples whose nations are not superpowers.

But having the status of being top dog nation of the world come and go because being top dog nation is all about fighting and winning wars as well as hanging on to what you have. Eventually, your civilisation loses its mojo and others overtake you, especially if you don't maintain standards, have enough children that you bring up properly, or are more interested in wine, women and song than in maintaining standards.

Perhaps deep down we all like to think we are better than other people, but of course it would not be politic to say that. It would be terrible if you behaved as if you really did think you were better than other people and were rude and bossy as well as having a penchant for kicking their doors down, bombing their homes, raping their women and killing their children just for the sake of imposing regime change and advancing your neocon interests and arms sales.



The most powerful white people are American, but all empires rise and fall. If people want to think they are better than me, I cannot stop them. I believe they have the absolute right to think they are better than me even if I do not agree with them and find it offensive that they think they are better than me.

I give them this right because I too sometimes think I am better than other people, especially people who are obviously stupider, uglier, poorer with much much lower morals than me.

Sometimes, it is good for us to think we are better than others, because it motivates us to do things, rather than forever feel inferior and self-effacing with never enough confidence or self-belief to ever undertake risky and ambitious projects.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/nigel-farage-donald-steve-bannon_uk_5829ed96e4b09ac74c535c5f?

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Bad government policies causes ordinary citizens in the West to hate and fear Muslims


If Trump doesn't become President, Americans

"are going to be homesick for the rest of our lives because America's gone." 
Ann Coulter

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/05/18/ann_coulter_if_trump_loses_its_over_for_america_well_be_homesick_forever.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07bc0wb from 8:33




















Wednesday, 13 May 2015

How will the government define "extremism" and what are British values?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05tllvh

0715

David Cameron is outlining new measures today to tackle extremism in the UK - plans for a counter-extremism bill will be set out at the first meeting since the election of the National Security Council. Jonathan Russell is the political liaison officer for Quilliam, the counter extremist think tank.

0810

David Cameron is outlining new measures today to tackle extremism in the UK - plans for a counter-extremism bill will be set out at the first meeting since the election of the National Security Council. Theresa May is the Home Secretary.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380595/SMSC_Guidance_Maintained_Schools.pdf

Through their provision of SMSC  (spiritual, moral, social and cultural [development]), schools should:
• enable students to develop their self-knowledge, self-esteem and self-confidence;
• enable students to distinguish right from wrong and to respect the civil and
criminal law of England;
• encourage students to accept responsibility for their behaviour, show initiative, and
to understand how they can contribute positively to the lives of those living and
working in the locality of the school and to society more widely;
• enable students to acquire a broad general knowledge of and respect for public
institutions and services in England;
• further tolerance and harmony between different cultural traditions by enabling
students to acquire an appreciation of and respect for their own and other cultures;
• encourage respect for other people; and
• encourage respect for democracy and support for participation in the democratic
processes, including respect for the basis on which the law is made and applied in
England.
The list below describes the understanding and knowledge expected of pupils as a result of schools promoting fundamental British values.
• an understanding of how citizens can influence decision-making through the democratic process;
• an appreciation that living under the rule of law protects individual citizens and is
essential for their well-being and safety;
• an understanding that there is a separation of power between the executive and
the judiciary, and that while some public bodies such as the police and the army
can be held to account through Parliament, others such as the courts maintain
independence;
• an understanding that the freedom to choose and hold other faiths and beliefs is
protected in law;
• an acceptance that other people having different faiths or beliefs to oneself (or
having none) should be accepted and tolerated, and should not be the cause of
prejudicial or discriminatory behaviour; and
• an understanding of the importance of identifying and combating discrimination.

As a qualified solicitor, I am sure Anjem Choudary already understands all of the above.

If Britain is a matriarchal society - and believe me it is - does proposing and promoting a return to the patriarchy mean you are guilty of extremism?

What is the evidence that Britain is a matriarchal society? The desecration by the establishment of the institution of marriage. All it takes for a matriarchy to establish itself is the absence of the practice of marriage and society's lack of respect for this institution. To respect marriage, we must logically and necessarily forbid extramarital sex. Instead, however, a Conservative government actually went out of its way to legalise gay marriage, which is like decriminalising what was once a criminal offence to solve the crime problem. Sadly, the British are now so degenerate that they cannot see through this ruse, or worse, they are so depraved they pretend not to understand this point no matter how many times or how clearly I explain this.


To this list I would add "paedo".

Margaret Thatcher:

Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Watch your words, for they become actions. Watch your actions, for they become habits. Watch your habits, for they become your character. And watch your character, for it becomes your destiny. 

Q1.   What are the thoughts of the British?

A1.   [Extramarital] sex and shopping.

Q2.   What are the actions of the British?

A2.   Sexual intercourse, especially of the extramarital variety.

Q3.   What are the habits of the British?

A3.   Drunkenness, over-eating, gambling, anti-social behaviour and borrowing to buy things they don't need with money they don't have. When they are not having extramarital sex, drinking, over-eating and shopping, they like pretending that indiscriminate universal suffrage - the so-called democratic process - is superior to all forms of government when it is clear that they out of all nations have lost the most through the operation of democracy.

Poppy Mania Day prevents any rational and impartial analysis of the insanity of UK foreign policy for the past 100 years

In short, their habits are indulging in all the seven deadly sins without any longer being able to understand the concept of sin let alone list them.

Q4.  What are the characteristics of the British?

A4.   Dipso, fatso, bingo, ASBO, Tesco, paedo, and denial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Q5.   What is the destiny of the British?

A5.   Deuteronomy 28: Curses for disobedience



SSMs = Slut Single Mothers

It has been a British "value" not to criticise irresponsible, stupid and promiscuous women since 1974.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened'

The 4 Categories of Unmarried Motherhood

Most children of British mothers born out of wedlock - most British children *bastards*, most British mothers *sluts*, no male British politician will criticise sluts, therefore all British men lower than stupid, irresponsible, promiscuous sluts who are bad mothers of bastards.

Tories have been soliciting the vote of stupid irresponsible promiscuous sluts who are bad mothers of bastards since 2002, *at the suggestion of Theresa May*.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/11554595/Pornography-has-changed-the-landscape-of-adolescence-beyond-all-recognition.html

Allison Pearson:

In recent years, Sue had treated growing numbers of teenage girls with internal injuries caused by frequent anal sex; not, as Sue found out, because she wanted to, or because she enjoyed it – on the contrary – but because a boy expected her to. “I’ll spare you the gruesome details,” said Sue, “but these girls are very young and slight and their bodies are simply not designed for that.”

Her patients were deeply ashamed at presenting with such injuries. They had lied to their mums about it and felt they couldn’t confide in anyone else, which only added to their distress. When Sue questioned them further, they said they were humiliated by the experience, but they had simply not felt they could say no. Anal sex was standard among teenagers now, even though the girls knew that it hurt.

For Sue’s surgery isn’t in some inner-city borough where kids may have been brutalised or come from cultures where such practices are commonly used as contraception. Sue works in the leafy heart of Hampshire. The girls presenting with incontinence were often under the age of consent and from loving, stable homes. Just the sort of kids who, only two generations ago, would have been enjoying riding and ballet lessons, and still looking forward to their first kiss, not being coerced into violent sex by some kid who picked up his ideas about physical intimacy from a dogging video on his mobile.

Yet when Muslim parents take organised action to prevent the same thing from happening to their daughters, they are denounced as "Trojan horses". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10983109/Trojan-horse-plot-report-disturbing-evidence-of-intolerant-Islamic-ethos.html As you would expect, their Muslim values warns them against integrating into a society that asserts extramarital sex as a right or even a sacrament. While Muslims worship and fear an omnipotent and morally perfect God, Islamophobes, feminists and liberals worship and fear sluts. They fear and hate Islam because they see it as an ideology that threatens their right to have extramarital sex as well as what they regard as their "liberty" and their "way of life". 

How long has under-aged sex been condoned in Britain all the way up to the House of Lords? Since 1985. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Gillick+competence

DEMOCRATS' IDEAL VOTER: ILLEGAL ALIEN, SINGLE MOTHER, CONVICTED FELON

Coulter: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president"

Ian Cowie and Benedict Brogan agree with Claire Khaw's proposal of no representation without taxation (to disenfranchise non-taxpaying Slut Single Mothers)

Would David Cameron's proposal to "tackle extremism" criminalise people like Keith Joseph, Howard Flight, Ann Coulter, Ian Cowie and Benedict Brogan as well as my good self and Anjem Choudary?


004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=terrorism

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...