Translate

Showing posts with label Naim Attallah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Naim Attallah. Show all posts

Monday, 1 December 2014

The Great Gatsby is "chick lit" disguised as literature

THE PROBLEM WITH WESTERN CIVILISATION

Tom Buchanan, the husband of Daisy Buchanan, the novel's principal woman character, says:

"Civilization’s going to pieces,” broke out Tom violently. “I’ve gotten to be a terrible pessimist about things. Have you read “The Rise of the Colored Empires’ by this man Goddard?" "Why no,” I answered, rather surprised by his tone." "Well, it’s a fine book, and everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don’t look out the white race will be — will be utterly submerged. It’s all scientific stuff; it’s been proved." "Tom’s getting very profound,” said Daisy, with an expression of unthoughtful sadness. “He reads deep books with long words in them. What was that word we — " "Well these books are all scientific,” insisted Tom, glancing at her impatiently. “This fellow has worked out the whole thing. It’s up to us, who are the dominant race, to watch out or these other races will have control of things." "We’ve got to beat them down," whispered Daisy, winking ferociously toward the fervent sun. “You ought to live in California —” began Miss Baker, but Tom interrupted her by shifting heavily in his chair. “This idea is that we’re Nordics. I am, and you are, and you are, and —” After an infinitesimal hesitation he included Daisy with a slight nod, and she winked at me again. “ — And we’ve produced all the things that go to make civilization — oh, science and art, and all that. Do you see?” There was something pathetic in his concentration, as if his complacency, more acute than of old, was not enough to him any more.

Goddard was really STODDARD

‘Stoddard argued that race and heredity were the guiding factors of history and civilization and that the elimination or absorption of the "white" race by "colored" races would result in the destruction of Western civilization.

Some predictions made in The Rising Tide of Color were accurate; others were not. Accurate ones — not all of which were original to Stoddard or predicated on white supremacy — include Japan's rise as a major power; a war between Japan and the USA; a second war in Europe; the overthrowing of European colonial empires in Africa and Asia; the mass migration of non-white peoples to white countries; and the rise of Islam as a threat to the West because of Muslim religious fanaticism (Stoddard was an Islamic scholar and published the book, The New World of Islam in 1921.)

In The Revolt Against Civilization (1922), Stoddard put forward the theory that civilization places a growing burden on individuals, leading to a growing underclass of individuals who cannot keep up and a 'ground-swell of revolt'. Stoddard advocated immigration restriction and birth control legislation in order to reduce the numbers of the underclass while promoting the growth of the middle and upper classes. He believed social progress was impossible unless it was guided by a "neo-aristocracy" made up of the most capable individuals and reconciled with the findings of science rather than based on abstract idealism and egalitarianism.’

Read Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy or see the movie, and you will have an idea who the enemy within is.

After reading Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power you will know exactly what the problem is. The rotten apple referred to in the film that was at right at the top of the tree was the wife of a senior intelligence officer.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/there-is-rotten-apple-jim-right-at-top.html

How strange that men can watch a film that only men are expected to like and not get any of the subtle references.

The point is that Smiley's wife fucked the mole and caused all that trouble, death and mayhem. At the end of the movie you saw him stroking her head when he should have given her a clout.

As for GATSBY, it seems men who have read it are blind to the fact that Daisy Buchanan was really the very worst kind of woman - an adulteress, a mother who wanted her daughter to grow up to become a "beautiful fool", who caused so many deaths, and no man passes any comment about her except me.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

The Victorians would call this sort of a woman a SIREN.

British men would mostly be OK about having a wife like Daisy Buchanan or Smiley's. Indeed, most of them can't see anything wrong with any of this at all, as long as the sex is good, even as they continue blaming the coloured races, Jews, Catholics, Muslims etc for their decline and fall.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherchez_la_femme

a French phrase which literally means "look for the woman." The implication is that a man behaves out of character or in an otherwise inexplicable manner because he is trying to cover up an affair with a woman, or trying to impress or gain favor with a woman.



The Trojan War was about a man getting his adulterous wife back.  Read The Trojan Women by Euripides to see how Helen gets away with all the trouble she caused. She takes no responsibility whatsoever. As for stoning women to death for adultery, it is interesting to know that this idea does not come from the Koran or even solely from the Bible, but from the Greeks. This was what Hecabe, widow of Priam, King of Troy, proposed should happen to adulterous women, especially Helen.  

This is how women can cause collective neurosis in men. It becomes very dangerous when this collective neurosis affects men in positions of power and influence.

In the film of TINKER TAILOR Ann was seductive and powerful. In both versions of GATSBY, Daisy was simply insufferable.

Fitzgerald got the story of Gatsby from a newspaper report of a similar tragedy, so it was based on a true story.

Perhaps Le Carre was trying to make a point. Perhaps Fitzgerald was too, but without even knowing it.

Fitzgerald married an upper class woman who was a siren with mental health issues.

Fitzgerald praises Gatsby though. He even eulogises him for having "the quality of hope". Disgusting. But then it is libtard feelgood CRAP that most women love so much.

Women of course love that novel. They fantasise about some rich and powerful man who could have it all destroying himself over them.

Perhaps that explains its great popularity. It is really shit chick lit disguised as literature. Fitzgerald was also a DRUNK.

Women are now mostly in charge and senior men in positions of power and influence defer to women they find attractive unthinkingly and unquestioningly, however rotten their morals,.  For to question this practice would be to admit that they had been wrong all their lives to promote Free Love and even  now say that it is all harmless, innocent joyous fun because they are all right, Jack. If they can get away with going to their graves without being caught out or having to recant, that is precisely what they intend to do.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/why-did-lorraine-kelly-have-her-tits.html Sadly, Naim Attallah is one of these many men in a position of influence. I am sure commercial considerations also apply.

Clearly, http://quartetbooks.co.uk/shop/venus


would sell much much better than

Photo of 'Sex and Power' front cover
Click to order Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power


Feminists seize publishing

The Bhagavad Gita:

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." 

Feminazi laws to end British tradition of pantos at Christmas

The incestuous nature of British book publishing and the inevitability of feminist censorship

Interestingly, the only novelist of any talent in Bron's family is Bron's wife IMHO.

I have today ordered The Gossips and The House from Amazon. Her latest I may just leave till it comes out in paperback. What I love about them is the pellucid prose, and the fact that there is always a moral to her stories. I remember complaining bitterly to Bron about his relations just writing any old rubbish cobbled together from their lives and still managing to get published. I do have all Bron's novels but I have to be honest and say I didn't think they were much cop either. Turbulent Decade http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Diaries-Auberon-Waugh-Turbulent/dp/0233978119 was what made me fall in love with him.

I don't imagine that I will be receiving a review copy of Daisy Waugh's latest book, which has been compared to The Great Gatsby.





Why did Lorraine Kelly have her tits out for Robert Downey Jr anyway?


http://quartetbooks.wordpress.com/2014/12/01/a-lesson-to-us-all/

A Lesson to Us All

I love women with a great sense of humour who can take care of every situation without feeling embarrassed and come out looking as charming as ever.
A case in point is the admirable Lorraine Kelly, who kept her cool when Robert Downey Jr. (my favourite actor) arrived for an interview and promptly commented that she had ‘nice tits’.
Instead of being outraged, as some prickly women would have been, she remained unabashed. Robert was looking in a shambolic state, being shoeless and rather dazed.
Kelly’s behaviour in the circumstances was immaculate. At the age of fifty-four she must have realised that, after all, the actor meant it as a compliment. Otherwise he would not have ventured with the observation.
‘It could have been worse,’ she told Jonathan Ross magnanimously, during an appearance on his show. ‘He could have said, “Oh, I don’t like them.” It would have been a difficult thing to respond to.’
Well, Lorraine has the right attitude. For although Robert’s remark is traditionally considered unacceptable, particularly by the feminist commentariat, it can only be interpreted by the enlightened majority as a sign of admiration for that part of a woman’s body which men throughout the ages have been lyrically obsessed with.
Why make a fuss, therefore, of the phraseology of a man whose drug addiction and vulnerability got him into many a scrap, when his throwaway observation was simply, I imagine, to break the ice, given his tattered appearance at the time.
Lorraine proved that strong women are more immune to men’s lewd behaviour than feminists lead us to believe. Her handling of the whole awkward encounter must in the circumstances be a lesson to us all.

ONE RESPONSE TO “A LESSON TO US ALL”

  1. If her tits were on display then Downey must have felt it only polite to compliment her about it. Why were they even on display on the first place? To provoke comment was precisely her intention. What are we to think of a 54 year old woman who puts her tits on display to provoke comment?

Thursday, 12 June 2014

Auberon Waugh and me

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114571720833
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114571729281
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114577575041
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114643906177
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114644699521
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114644838785
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114645122177
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114645134977
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114645357697
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114658623361
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696222849
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696213121
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695906433
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695900545
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695853185
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695736449
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695469185
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696324993
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695772289
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696857217
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695809921
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695884161
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114655013505
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697305985
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697274497
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697843585
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697683073
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697319041
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114699641985
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114699668097
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114699795073
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760756353
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760762753
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760781185
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760776321
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760936577
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760863617
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760854145
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760741761
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114761465985
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114804235649

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

The brilliant screenplay to HITLER - THE MOVIE ignored in our PC world

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Hitler-Claus-Hant/dp/0704371820


I noticed today that Naim Attallah with whom I had lunch this time two years ago was complaining that the critics had completely ignored Claus Hant's "non-fiction novel" entitled YOUNG HITLER

Naim Attallah at Le Boudin Blanc where we had lunch in January 2011
http://www.boudinblanc.co.uk/

Naim tweeted:

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/290910057649033216"For those who follow my blog read my article tomorrow about " Young Hitler" a book Quartet published in 2010. It was ignored then ."


https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/290911532840263680"Why was "Young Hitler "ignored? Although on the face of it the reason is obscure, the reality is different . It is thought provoking......"

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/291451642807742464Diana Mosley http://wp.me/pGlMo-ET 

It is terribly sad that the liberal establishment and media are conspiring to ignore this book which is both entertaining and profound.   My review is at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/book-on-which-hitler-movie-will-be.html

Here is what I suggest Quartet Books do for maximum publicity:

Announce that forthcoming issues of The Literary Review and The Oldie will contain reviews of Young Hitler by


  1. the current Lord Chief Rabbi
  2. the former Lord Chief Rabbi
  3. the Neturei Karta Rabbi
  4. the current Archbishop of Canterbury
  5. the former Archbishop of Canterbury
  6. Abdal Hakim Murad
  7. Anjem Choudary
  8. David Irving who will I hope one day become Lord Irving of Nazism in the same way Kenneth Clark  became Lord Clark of Civilisation
  9. the PM or anyone he nominates
  10. the Deputy PM or anyone he nominates
  11. the Leader of the Opposition or anyone he nominates
  12. the leader of UKIP
  13. the leader of the BNP

who would all be sent review copies.

It would not surprise me at all if many of the above would shrink from this undertaking, but out of this lot I really think Naim can at least squeeze at least a review or three out of this list.  

It does not all have to be published in one issue, though it would be nice to have an Adolf Hitler Special  issue of both the Literary Review and the Oldie, which would no doubt increase their respective circulations dramatically, if the publicity is managed properly, by me, perhaps.  

It is possible that the editrix of the Literary Review Nancy Sladek might baulk at this idea, but I would like to think that Richard Ingrams of the Oldie would still be game for a laugh.  In my experience, it is not the elderly but the young who have a fit of the vapours whenever they see a swastika.  The old should always retain the capacity to shock the young, and the idea of the Oldie doing a Nazi Special is too delicious for words.

Saturday, 1 January 2011

Day 6: "Unpersonned" by BBC Censor of Today Programmne Facebook page

My Sixth email to the BBC Today Programme:

To date I have still not received a response from you after nearly a week of writing to you every day.

I have over 200 Facebook friends who are now on the Today Programme Facebook page, one of whom is the distinguished and incomparable Naim Attallah, owner of the Literary Review as well as Herman von Rompuy, President of the European Council. 

You are not going to get away with banning me from commenting WITHOUT EXPLANATION OR WARNING, after deleting all my comments in a desperate effort to "unperson" me because you think my comments are too dangerous to be displayed.  Meanwhile I am daily libelled by that egregious Communist and Feminist Caron Kendall, with no right of reply. 

Why can't you get it together to even respond to me?

The "Where's Claire?" Whither Free Speech Campaign is well and truly starting up now. 

For good measure I have also written to todaycomplaints@bbc.co.uk as follows:

I have now received this response:
Dear Claire Khaw, Thank you for your emails. I have spoke to our online team. I understand that they have taken action because of unacceptable content in a number of your postings. Yours sincerely Dominic Groves Duty Editor 'Today' www.bbc.co.uk/complaints   1/1/11 
to which I have responded:
May I know in what way they were unacceptable and whether my ban is permanent?

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...