Translate

Showing posts with label Natalie Nougayrede. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Natalie Nougayrede. Show all posts

Friday, 9 January 2015

Is Charlie Hebdo guilty of provoking the terrorist attack? Will you get the answer wrong ON PURPOSE?

Worse, will our governments get the answer wrong on purpose because most voters will get the answers wrong on purpose?



1:06 Natalie Nougayrede, former editor of Le Monde, now a columnist with the Guardian presumes to tell us what not to think at 1:06. Well, fuck HER and read http://www.catholicleague.org/muslims-right-angry/ instead. 


https://twitter.com/CristinaOhq/status/553511643607740416

Women and liberals are not really into discussing the truth without calling it "vile"  and "dangerous", are they?

This clash of civilisations is basically between

(1)  the West whose governments and politicians are too terrified to alienate the female vote because they have to keep the whole shebang of democracy going, and

and

(2) the Muslims who think democracy run by sluts for sluts, the LGBT and their running dogs is crap and should be replaced by Islam that will encourage men to assert patriarchal moral values again.

In short, this clash of civilisations is between people who

(a) think gay marriage should be spread over the world like manure spread by a manure spreader

and

(b) those who will kill to keep this kind of filth out of their country and away from their people.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10200636/I-want-to-export-gay-marriage-around-the-world-says-David-Cameron.html

Put it another way:

Would the terrorists say Charlie Hebdo provoked the attack?

If the terrorists said Charlie Hebdo provoked the attack then they must have provoked the attack, mustn't they?

http://leplus.nouvelobs.com/contribution/687164-charlie-hebdo-mgr-vingt-trois-mariage-gay-moquer-les-religions-un-mal-necessaire.html

Who is the zealot and fanatic? The Muslim or the militant atheist who delights in causing gratuitous offence to Muslims?

No getting round this fact, is there, unless you are a head-burying liberal ostrich who insists on the absolute right to gratuitously offend anyone and expects and believes that there will be no retaliation.

When there is retaliation, the reaction of this militant atheist liberal ostrich is to do more of the same because he insists on his right to show contempt for Muslims while expecting them never to retaliate.

What they are hoping for then is to have a 21st century European War of Religion, perhaps, which they expect to win giving them the opportunity to massacre and expel Muslims, burn down mosques then ban Islam so they can have their Muslim-free Europe.

I know Western Islamophobes safely out of the West - living in non-Muslim countries - who advocate and pray for precisely this.

These are the people who won't answer this question as truth and logic would dictate even though they are graduates quite able to see the implications of the wording of this question. These are the people who are the ones with the dangerous ideas and atheist zealots who insist on their absolute right to cause gratuitous offence in order to assert their racial, cultural and what they think is their intellectual and moral superiority over Muslims.

https://polldaddy.com/poll/8570599/


I care more about the ancestors of 21st century Christians than their descendants care about them

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2026/08/christian-theology-is-idolatry-and.html Karen Kilby 3:00  Christian guilt Christians belie...