Translate

Showing posts with label Cristina Odone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cristina Odone. Show all posts

Friday, 9 January 2015

Is Charlie Hebdo guilty of provoking the terrorist attack? Will you get the answer wrong ON PURPOSE?

Worse, will our governments get the answer wrong on purpose because most voters will get the answers wrong on purpose?



1:06 Natalie Nougayrede, former editor of Le Monde, now a columnist with the Guardian presumes to tell us what not to think at 1:06. Well, fuck HER and read http://www.catholicleague.org/muslims-right-angry/ instead. 


https://twitter.com/CristinaOhq/status/553511643607740416

Women and liberals are not really into discussing the truth without calling it "vile"  and "dangerous", are they?

This clash of civilisations is basically between

(1)  the West whose governments and politicians are too terrified to alienate the female vote because they have to keep the whole shebang of democracy going, and

and

(2) the Muslims who think democracy run by sluts for sluts, the LGBT and their running dogs is crap and should be replaced by Islam that will encourage men to assert patriarchal moral values again.

In short, this clash of civilisations is between people who

(a) think gay marriage should be spread over the world like manure spread by a manure spreader

and

(b) those who will kill to keep this kind of filth out of their country and away from their people.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10200636/I-want-to-export-gay-marriage-around-the-world-says-David-Cameron.html

Put it another way:

Would the terrorists say Charlie Hebdo provoked the attack?

If the terrorists said Charlie Hebdo provoked the attack then they must have provoked the attack, mustn't they?

http://leplus.nouvelobs.com/contribution/687164-charlie-hebdo-mgr-vingt-trois-mariage-gay-moquer-les-religions-un-mal-necessaire.html

Who is the zealot and fanatic? The Muslim or the militant atheist who delights in causing gratuitous offence to Muslims?

No getting round this fact, is there, unless you are a head-burying liberal ostrich who insists on the absolute right to gratuitously offend anyone and expects and believes that there will be no retaliation.

When there is retaliation, the reaction of this militant atheist liberal ostrich is to do more of the same because he insists on his right to show contempt for Muslims while expecting them never to retaliate.

What they are hoping for then is to have a 21st century European War of Religion, perhaps, which they expect to win giving them the opportunity to massacre and expel Muslims, burn down mosques then ban Islam so they can have their Muslim-free Europe.

I know Western Islamophobes safely out of the West - living in non-Muslim countries - who advocate and pray for precisely this.

These are the people who won't answer this question as truth and logic would dictate even though they are graduates quite able to see the implications of the wording of this question. These are the people who are the ones with the dangerous ideas and atheist zealots who insist on their absolute right to cause gratuitous offence in order to assert their racial, cultural and what they think is their intellectual and moral superiority over Muslims.

https://polldaddy.com/poll/8570599/


Thursday, 12 June 2014

Auberon Waugh and me

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114571720833
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114571729281
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114577575041
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114643906177
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114644699521
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114644838785
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114645122177
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114645134977
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114645357697
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114658623361
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696222849
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696213121
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695906433
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695900545
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695853185
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695736449
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695469185
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696324993
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695772289
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114696857217
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695809921
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114695884161
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114655013505
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697305985
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697274497
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697843585
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697683073
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114697319041
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114699641985
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114699668097
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114699795073
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760756353
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760762753
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760781185
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760776321
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760936577
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760863617
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760854145
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114760741761
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114761465985
http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/114804235649

Thursday, 2 January 2014

An electoral strategy to defeat the matriarchy and bring back the patriarchy

In my opinion, my ethological analysis of the degradation of the Western male, who are all omega males because they are afraid of offending their omega females, is a useful and sticky idea. It adequately explains why foreign men come to the West to exploit the West's welfare benefits and its easy women under the very noses of angry white men who remain impotent and afraid of pointing to the cause of their degeneracy: the promiscuous woman whom they love to fuck. Cheap slut sex is the opium of the men in a matriarchy. This is further explained at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/not-only-are-most-men-beta-males-most.html

Women basically have two kinds of allies in men:

(1) Married and marriageable men who want to keep the price of sex high and who want to respect marriage and who care about the long term national interest. These men would tend to be the ones who have already done the right thing, ie got married, stay married and have legitimate offspring.

(2) MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) These are men mostly unmariageable and understandably want to keep the price of sex low and who want to protect the slut because the slut is their only source of sex, after which they only have the option of prostitutes, adultery, sodomy, incest, paedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia and masturbation as a last resort.

It would actually be quite easy to discredit and dismiss the views of men in the second category.

Why should we allow Western civilisation to be destroyed by the moral corruption of sluts, SSMs and MCSFs, ie those who indulge in extramarital sex and who have no intention of adding to the social and demographic capital of the nation either because they do not wish to, or will never be given the opportunity to do so because they are poor specimens of masculinity and also financially incapable of attracting and retaining the interest of a rational and moral woman?

As for the female voters that leaders of political parties are so afraid to alienate, they are easy to divide and rule.  Basically, all the political establishment has to do is divide female voters into mothers and non-mothers and ask the mothers if they would rather have the option of being housewives and mothers instead of being forced to work.  Most women only work because they have to, and would be quite happy to give up work.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1219131/What-women-REALLY-want-Forget-working-Superwoman-ideal-mothers-value-time-home-children-Cristina-Odone.html

As for the non-mothers, who have not so far contributed to the rearing of the next generation, their selfish and self-serving views can easily be ignored and dismissed too.

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...