Translate

Showing posts with label Panorama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Panorama. Show all posts

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Will Panorama succeed in stopping the witch-hunt on elderly and dead white men of the establishment?

THE CRIMINAL STANDARD OF PROOF
THAT PANORAMA PROGRAMME

"Mark" looks gay and is the most compelling interviewee. He was the one abused in the Grafton Close care home by the owner of it and his friend the Catholic priest. He has never been to Elm Guest House. It was in his own care home where the abuse took place.

He was a pretty boy, small for his age. He and another boy were the owner's favourites.

Man who worked at Elm Guest House briefly in the 1980s didn't recall any high profile visitors. He said he would have recognised him.

Chris Fay - the old man who insisted he had seen the compromising photographs of Leon Brittan in an apron was previously convicted for fraud connected with shares.

Peter Saunders appears to trust the CPS which is run by an unashamed feminazi implicitly.

But then Peter Saunders is from the National Association of People Abused in Childhood.

Lord MacDonald former DPP 2003 - 2008 speaks out against these police investigations and doubts their impartiality.

No reports of murders or runnings over of schoolboys in Kingston at the time.

http://barristerblogger.com/2014/11/16/exaro-news-playing-dangerous-game-paedophile-murder-story/

" ... and a first name and .... "


"David':
"I could never be 100% sure it were Dolphin Square, not really, no. I can only be ... I can only be sure about ... I can only think I'm sure ... in my mind if people say 'Yes, you're right, it is, it is Dolphin Square, so really it came from other people, not from me, because I never said properly back in 1990, being honest, I never said Dolphin Square." 
What about the man 'David' identified as one of his abusers Leon Brittan?

"The surname came out of Chris Fay's mouth, and I just went along with it. I identified him with a photograph, but there again, he were a well-known MP and I might have seen him on TV through the years and stuff and I might have just gotten confused."
The police interviewed David for 50 hours but didn't pursue the case. They didn't consider Darren's evidence to be significant either.

Then a WOMAN called Jane accused Leon Brittan about an alleged incident in 1967. She claimed she had been raped in his basement flat; Leon Brittain lived in a top floor flat. Tom Watson took on her case even though she wasn't one of his constituents. All who could have corroborated her evidence contradicted it.

Watson says the evidence he gave to the police has resulted in three successful prosecutions. Appeal, appeal!

Ian McFadyen who was sexually abused and went to the same prep school as Francis Wheen, Deputy of Private Eye says:

"Do I think some people have used us a step politically upwards? Yes, I do."

Ends with Peter Spindler saying they all can't be making it up.

Lord MacDonald criticises Tom Watson's risky behaviour.


I know most people want to think they did it, and would happily punish them even if they actually knew they didn't do it. That is how much politicians are hated and held in contempt. This is something they should reflect on as they go about their business.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 15 April 2013

"LSE behaviour like the beaver on its crest, biting off their own genitals in stress"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22140716

" ... the LSE students' union general secretary, Ms Peters-Day - who was not on the trip - told the BBC News channel: "One of the students made it absolutely clear that she was not made aware of what happened."

It would be a female student, wouldn't it?

I take this to mean that they are hoping for financial compensation for the apprehension of what might have happened, even though they all got back safely without incident.  

If they had been incarcerated, it would have added greatly to their political education.  Then they would have returned to sell their story to the newspapers and made good their brief loss of liberty and enhanced their education.

I really do not see what the problem was.  Perhaps it is just symptomatic of our Culture of Complaint and Entitlement.

Does the LSE have a course on this, I wonder, or would it be too politically incorrect for them?

Instead, they have LSE 100 - a course in leftist indoctrination.  http://www.lse.ac.uk/resources/calendar/courseGuides/LS/2012_LSE100.htm

We all know what a leftist indoctrinated bunch they are, really, don't we?

Will they get a job after they graduate, or will the female graduates become single mothers who are a burden on the state?   If so, it may be better that they do not return at all.  

I am suddenly reminded of this verse in the Koran requiring a loan agreement to be witnessed by two women but only one man, because women can be a bit forgetful or can get things wrong due to being easily swayed by their emotions.  Perhaps there was and remains a good reason for this.  

O you who believe! If you contract a loan for a stated term then write it down, and let a scribe faithfully write it down between you. A scribe should not refuse to write as Allah taught him, but let him write, and let he who owes the debt dictate; but let him fear Allah his Lord and not diminish anything of it. But if the debtor was a fool, weak, or cannot dictate himself, then let his agent faithfully dictate. And call to witness two witnesses from amongst your men, but if they were not two men then a man and two women, from those whom you deem fit as witnesses, so that if one of the two [women] should err, the second may remind the other. Let not the witnesses refuse when they are summoned. Do not tire of writing it, be it small or great, with its term. That is more just in the sight of God, more upright for testimony, and best for avoiding doubt, unless it is a ready-money transaction between you, which you arrange between yourselves, then it is no offence by you that you do not write it down. Have witnesses when you sell one to another, and let not either scribe or witness come to harm, for if you do it will be an abomination in you. Fear Allah, for Allah teaches you, and Allah knows all things. (2.282)

If the reputation of the LSE was damaged it would have been because of its unseemly and doomed attempt to stop the BBC from broadcasting what everyone now wants to watch.  It was a spectacular own goal and demonstrates the ineptitude of LSE politicking, does it not?  The LSE should blame itself then, instead of the BBC.

All it can do is boring academic jargon about political theories that no one actually engaged in practical politics ever cares about.

What are politics students for, anyway?  Can anyone think of a purpose for them?  Would you give a job to a politics graduate?

I still remember attending that bemusingly other worldly talk intended to plug the Oxford Handbook of the History of Nationalism with a few of my nationalist associates.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/lsenationalism.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, 23 October 2012

What George Entwistle should have done

http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/ss8hg/panorama--jimmy-savile---what-the-bbc-knew-a-panorama-special

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/22/george-entwistle-bbc-jimmy-savile-panorama_n_2003730.html?utm_hp_ref=media
  1. Pulled the tribute programme for Jimmy Savile.
  2. Pulled the investigation into Jimmy Savile.

That is what I would have done anyway.

You cannot pursue someone beyond the grave.   To do so would set a terribly bad precedent.   Do not speak ill of the dead, for they can no longer defend themselves.   

Imagine yourself dead and all sorts of terrible things being said about you being a paedo and everything else, just cos some people feel like sticking the knife in and humiliating your loved ones.   

Even if Jimmy Savile were guilty of everything he is accused of, his accusers should have done their accusing while he was still alive.

Nothing they say can now be proven or disproved, and all their evidence is contaminated.   

Next time someone sexually exploits you, complain about it pronto and don't wait till the perp is dead, OK?

The DG does have the air of a slightly incompetent headmaster though, so I think he will end up having to resign.   It seems he was something to do with BBC Vision which was responsible for the tribute programme.  Understandably, Entwistle did not want that pulled, perhaps out of loyalty to his old department, but that was the wrong call, O Slightly Incompetent Looking Headmaster, and you will have to pay the price, I predict.   

Let his head roll rather than make the licence fee payer pay for Jimmy Savile's gropes and under-aged sex.

Who will be the new DG, I wonder.

If the licence fee payer ends up paying for any of these shenanigans then it is one more nail in the coffin for the BBC, which should be broken up and sold, leaving just one state propaganda TV channel and radio station for the government.




https://www.facebook.com/JusticeForJimmySavileAndTheBbc?fref=ts
"Like" this Facebook page if you don't want the BBC licence fee payer to be forced to pay out to a bunch of superannuated groupies offering stale and contaminated evidence in the hope of financial compensation.
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, 1 June 2011

Abuse of the retarded in care homes

Secret filming caught patients being dragged and slapped by support workers

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13548222

Simon, one of the adult inmates with the age of a 4 year old, was returned home to his family after footage of his ill-treatment was shown to his parents.  I wonder if they ever threaten to send him back to Winterbourne View whenever he misbehaves.  Indeed, I wonder if his family now secretly curse the Panorama reporter for bringing his abuse to their attention, and making them feel obliged to take him back to live with them.  I know I would be. I know how ashamed and disgusted with myself I would be that anything that came out of me would be such a trouble to those around him that filicide would be the only honorable option.    

I know this is not how the British think, but this is how I think.

It costs the taxpayer £3,500 per week to keep these inmates in these homes. In March I said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show  that if I had a severely disabled baby I would smother it if the midwife would not do so for me.

I stand by that statement.

It seems that while the government wrings its hands about how it can no longer afford to to pay for these people to be kept in these uncaring homes, and the uncaring homes cannot find good caring staff to run these homes, I am still condemned for saying what I did.

Such is the contemptible hypocrisy and cowardice of the British and their government.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/05/gang-of-disabled-people-victimise.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/05/disabled-people-against-claire-khaw.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/03/is-it-always-right-to-keep-them-very.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/03/claire-khaw-on-victoria-derbyshire-show.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/unlike-others-i-dont-it-is-disaster-at.html
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/05/in-context-jeffrey-marshalls-comments.html 
at 14 comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Celebrating Juneteenth is celebrating political parties, defying God, the ever-expanding welfare state that is eating American taxpayers out of house and home and the American Civil War

  11:53 AM @OfficialSecularKoranism #2 ​I would encourage people to defend their beliefs and show their colours, if they have any! It is the...