Translate

Showing posts with label anti-discrimination legislation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-discrimination legislation. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 April 2016

Claire Khaw not speaking at London anti-feminist conference on 8-10 July 2016



Alan Bowker 

Still looking for that free invite to the Conference in July?

Claire Khaw 

I knew I would never get it. Buchanan is not even live-streaming the event. He is utterly without imagination. Even pretending to consider the idea of having me as a speaker and then rejecting it would create more publicity for the conference.
He cannot bear to hear that the only way to eradicate feminism now is to (1) narrow the franchise to taxpayers only (2) repeal the Equality Act 2010 (3) abolish no fault divorce.

He cannot bear to hear that the only way of doing any of the above would be after an Islamic Revolution or the use of a threat of one.

Will any of the others be saying this? Unlikely.

Not only will Buchanan not do what it is necessary to do, he will not say what is necessary to be said. He will not say what is necessary to be said because he will not think the thoughts that are necessary to be thought to say what it is necessary to say.

Monday, 1 February 2016

Why the beta male needs Islam



Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex.

If you want beta males to have a reasonable chance of finding a wife who will bear and bring up his children and stay with him, then society must

a) shame sluts with 24:2 of the Koran  quran.com/24/2

b) repeal all anti-discrimination legislation

c) abolish no fault divorce.

Beta male victims of feminism are just not up to asking for this, or, if they do ask for this, of getting it for themselves.

THAT IS WHY ONLY ISLAM IS THE ANSWER FOR BETA MALES TO HAVE A REASONABLE CHANCE OF FINDING A WIFE WHO WON'T DIVORCE HIM THE MOMENT SHE GETS BORED AND IRRITATED BY HIM, TAKE HALF HIS STUFF, KICK HIM OUT OF THE MATRIMONIAL HOME AND DEPRIVE HIM OF HIS CHILDREN.

If you were female and forced to choose, whose children would you bear?

a) A MGTOW who will never marry you
b) A jihadi warrior who has married you under Islamic law

The purpose of this question is to prove that even feminists who hate Islam and the patriarchy it stands for would still rather have the legitimate offspring of a jihadi warrior than be impregnated by a loser beta male. 

Thursday, 25 June 2015

How PC are you?

How would you feel if your 13 year old

1) son were seduced by his female teacher into having sexual intercourse with her?

2) daughter were seduced by by her male teacher into having sexual intercourse with him but not impregnated?

3) son were seduced into being sodomised by his pederast teacher?

4) daughter were seduced by her lesbian teacher?

If you answer differently to any of the 4 questions are you guilty of discriminating on grounds of age, sex and sexuality?

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/headteacher-anne-lakey-jailed-for-eight-years-after-having-sex-with-two-boys/ar-AAc2rXl?ocid=UP97DHP

Wednesday, 24 December 2014

The self-evident truth that feminism denies

Some things are easy for men but hard for women and vice versa. Most women are easily offended and find it hard to think logically, for example.

Most men find it easy to talk about sports and politics endlessly which would bore women silly.

If we acknowledge these differences, then we would have to acknowledge that men find it harder to say no to no-strings sex while women have more offers of sex than they would like to accept.

The problem with feminism is that it denies this self-evident truth, and uses all its legislative power to suppress the pointing out of this self-evident truth: that men are the weaker sex at saying no to no-strings sex.

For most women, sex is a chore while for most men it is a physical and all-consuming imperative.

If sex were a drug then men would be the user and women the dealer. The cancer of feminism is now so bone-deep that expecting the Western man to denounce feminism is like expecting a drug-addict to call the cops on his dealer. Ain't gonna happen.

And that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet and just voting UKIP is not going to be enough because UKIP are too afraid even to acknowledge the elephant in the room.

What does the elephant in the room consist of?


  1. indiscriminate universal suffrage
  2. representative democracy when we should have a one-party state that protects the rights of its members operating under the principles of Secular Koranism http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
  3. anti-discrimination legislation
  4. no-fault divorce
  5. gay marriage
  6. the civil partnership
  7. the consecration of our right to have extramarital sex (which is dysgenic) and the desecration of the institution of marriage (which is eugenic)
  8. the powerlessness of our politicians hence their despicable cowardice and hypocrisy
  9. the existence of the welfare state - another sacred cow - which supports all of the above making governments borrow recklessly to keep the whole shebang going

The operation of democracy prevents these tragic and continuing errors from being corrected and we are heading towards the edge of the cliff like lemmings.  

Please help me save Western civilisation by discussing this with any woman intelligent enough to understand this, even if you think she will disagree, become offended and never speak to you again.  

This would be your wife who will divorce you under the ruinous terms of no fault divorce, your daughter who will never speak to you again, and your slut girlfriend who will dump you, right?  

Ain't gonna happen, I know.

And that is why Western civilisation is going down the toilet.  

Any civilisation in which the overwhelming majority of men are afraid of women and husbands afraid of wives to even discuss politics cannot survive, let alone prosper. 

Can you imagine David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg discussing any of this with their wives? Or even Barack Obama?

I rest my case and my case is not based on a conspiracy theory. Men really are stupid and women really are crazy. Women are crazy because men become stupid the moment they say it is OK for women to be sluts, and women go crazy when they get the go ahead to be sluts.

We are all to blame if we do not work up the courage to confront the perniciousness of feminism.

Remember: once upon a time, a Wise Man created God to protect himself from feminism and his susceptibility to sluts.

When Aristotle said that the greatest injustice was to treat unequal things equally, he meant feminism would be the greatest injustice, and feminism is a cancer, waiting in the wings for its cue, for the right conditions to makes its entrance, to thrive and flourish. and then eventually kill its host ...

Athens did not become successful despite its alleged misogyny but because of it, but you won't hear classical historians like Mary Beard saying this, even if she agreed, cos she would be out of her job and out on her ear.

Feminazis have been victimising Camille Paglia for decades for speaking the truth.

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia

Why Claire Khaw does what she does

Thursday, 19 January 2012

The laws I would repeal if I were in power


  1. The European Communities Act 1972
  2. The Equality Act 2010 (which includes the Equal Pay Act 1970, the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, the Race Relations Act 1976, the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and three major statutory instruments protecting discrimination in employment on grounds of religion or belief, sexual orientation and age)
  3. The Abolition of the Death Penalty Act 1964
  4. The Human Rights Act 1998
  5. s 5 of the Public Order 1986
  6. the concept of a racially aggravated offence
for starters.

This wish to repeal laws makes me a LIBERTARIAN, get it?  Someone who wants fewer laws and lower taxes than the status quo is by definition a libertarian.   Someone who wants to abolish thoughtcrime is also a libertarian, but these days liberals are so fucked in the heads that they wouldn't recognise THOUGHTCRIME even if it came up to them and sat on their faces.   If you forbid someone from discriminating against a privileged class of people, you are censoring his thought and making a THOUGHTCRIME of his wish to discriminate.

But if you talk about abolishing thoughtcrime and repealing thoughtcrime legislation, you would be accused by the liberals of being an evil extremist Fascist Nazi racist homophobe ageist disablist etc.   That is how they silence their critics and prevent discussion of the existence of liberal THOUGHTCRIME.  They have made white black and black white and the slut and bastard British are too stupid to notice or protest now.   

Sunday, 19 December 2010

BBC: The Freedom Association is a 'slightly posher version of the BNP'

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2010/12/bbc-freedom-association-is-posher.html

http://takingliberties.squarespace.com/taking-liberties/2010/12/19/norris-mcwhirter-and-the-bbc-loose-words-cost-reputations.html?lastPage=true#comment10868740

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100068889/bbc-the-freedom-association-is-a-kind-of-sub-bnp/

So what if  it is?

The BNP is the other half of the Eurosceptic movement.

But perhaps those spineless, stupid, feeble-minded, feeble-spirited Eurosceptics who enjoy their occupational therapy of weakly whingeing but who keep voting for a Conservative Party run by a Commie Pinko think they are doing so well they don't need anyone else to join them.

If that is the case then clearly the Eurosceptic movement is dead in the water but just doesn't know it yet.  

The TFA should be proud of its association with Britain's bravest political party who will not run and hide under their beds whenever some smug stinking hypocritical liberal whispers "racist" in their ear, unlike the lily-livered Tories and UKIP.

Let us face the fact that middle class activists are almost without exception feeble of spirit and feeble of mind.

The TFA and UKIP are mainly made up of the elderly while the BNP membership remains youthful and energetic, and are not too stuck up to do the bread and butter work of political activism, ie leafleting.

The strength of the British proletariat to fight the disgusting and evil LibLabCon is required when so many members of the bourgeoisie are are so easily contemptibly easily to intimidate.

The strength of the BNP lies in the fact that the typical member has already crossed the Rubicon of refusing to shut up even when they are intimidated socially and politically for speaking what they believe to be the truth.

No other party has this quality of courage and determination.

What good are these so-called libertarians and UKIP for when they don't even recognise totalitarian thoughtcrime legislation even after it has repeatedly kicked them in the head?  I am of course referring to all anti-discrimination legislation passed by the liberal establishment over the decades the most recent of which is the Equality Act. 

Is it because they are stupid or because they are scared?

How typical of the easily-frightened middle classes to start talking about "BNP scum" the moment they are accused of having similar policies.

Pathetic, dishonorable and contemptible.

The truth is that the white middle classes hate the BNP much much more than the BNP are said to hate non-whites.

It would appear that those who like to think of themselves as Traditional Conservatives are more than prepared to let their nation die of the class divisions they are so apparently proud to live under.

The spinelessness, snobbery and stupidity of British men who wish to fight the LibLabCon has to be experienced to be believed.

Vincent Bruno‬ on the occult, the eternality of God and ‪@CollectiveDismal5‬ moving to China

  Astrology and the occult 1:00  Full moon and class attendance 4:00  Grey area Psychology Capricorn 5:00  Numerology 10:00  Personality tra...