How UKIP can move forward

Is it time for UKIP to allow ex-BNP members to join but make it a condition of their membership not to to advocate either privately or publicly

(a) apartheid

(b) repatriation

(c) making non-white British citizens second class citizens?

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/3083/andy-lovie-a-right-to-reply

UKIP man wants to make non-Europeans second class citizens

I'm actually not opposed to a strong, unified Europe just the weak, fractious, liberal, secular, socially democratic one we have at the moment; hence my desire to escape from its clutches. The Imperium Europa concept is too socially liberal for me; it is also secular.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium_Europa

My ideal would along the lines of the Roman Empire, restore classical education, underpinned by Christianity, an Imperator rather than a President, an Imperial Senate that meets in Rome with delegates from the nations of Europe; a fortress Europe that expels dissident elements, that is proudly European, that gives priority rights to European subjects and second rate ones to non Europeans. A European army assembled from national contingents under the command of outstanding European generals. An internally free trading Empire with Russia as an ally and trading freely with China, India and other developing nations.     

5 September 08:25

And below are his shockingly vengeful thoughts about what should happen to women who find themselves in need of an abortion:

If abortion must be countenanced then at least sterilise the defective life-bearer at the same time to prevent a repeat of this monstrousness from occurring in the future. Those who refuse to bear life when they took on board the responsibility to create it in the first place, ought not to be given a second chance.

5 September 22:29

If truth be told, this goes much further than the BNP (who only advocate voluntary repatriation and have no policy of sterilising women who have got themselves knocked up).

I find it rather galling that ex-BNP members who have not expressed such views cannot join UKIP while such a man who has expressed such a view is considered OK to stay in UKIP.

I wonder what Searchlight and Hope Not Hate have to say about this.

I have already suggested to UKIP a way of dealing with members who hold such views.


All UKIP members would be invited to sign a declaration that they will not so long as they remain in the party:

1.  promote a policy of the forcible repatriation of non-white British citizens

2.  promote apartheid

3.  promote any policy that discriminates either for or against any British citizen on racial grounds

on pain of expulsion.

This solution has been described as "ingenious" by Andrew Reed, UKIP spokesman in Brussels.  Sadly, they are still not going to do it.   Why not is a question that should be considered at conference with the utmost urgency and seriousness.

Although UKIP have refused to sell me a ticket on the grounds that I am an ex-BNP member, I intend to go to Birmingham to meet the more independent-minded type of UKIP activist.  It is quite disgraceful that UKIP are behaving as if they were a private club rather than a political party.  The longer they continue to confuse the nature of their role and the purpose of their activity, they shall remain the doldrums.

Should they admit me then doubtless they would have every intention of appointing me as their Director of Communications and Policy Consultant.   Once that is done, UKIP will go from strength to strength.

UKIP men must get over their fear of the likes of Maggie Chapman (a Scotswoman who about her four illegitimate grandchildren) and the likes of Ngaire Wadman who form a fearsome female cabal.

For this country to return to rationally small government, we must defeat feminism.  To defeat feminism, men must not be seen to be afraid of criticising SSMs (Slut Single Mums) and their Running Dogs (ie men who have sired illegitimate offspring and the grandparents of illegitimate grandchildren).  The worst way of desecrating the institution of marriage is to say, like Maggie does, that it is OK to have illegitimate grandchildren, that marriage is only a piece of paper and that it is optional even when you want to have children.

Men of UKIP, dare to discuss this with the woman of your life!

But you won't, because you are no longer men.   Pah.  

How UKIP can admit ex-members of parties and organisations on their prohibited list without being accused of harbouring racists

I am perfectly happy to sign a declaration that I have never nor will I ever

1.  promote a policy of the forcible repatriation of non-white British citizens

2.  promote apartheid

3.  promote any policy that discriminates either for or against any British citizen on racial grounds

on pain of expulsion.

What is nationalism?

1. It is the idea that the biggest gang you can be in that is big enough to matter and small enough to care is the nation.

2. The nation consists of different tribes who have agreed to become or remain a part of that nation because the benefits are perceived to be greater than the cost.

3. The purpose of nationalism is to promote the long term national interest.

4. If (3) is true then it is incumbent on any nationalist to discuss the subject of eugenics and to promote it through recognising the primacy of the institutions of marriage and family and acknowledging how feminism has desecrated those two institutions through causing widespread illegitimacy and degeneracy.

Ethno-nationalism is nothing more than whingeing and asking for things that you should already now know you will never get ie forcible repatriation of other races, apartheid and racial privileges.

That is why it is a DEAD DUCK.

However, there is nothing stopping you from preferring your own people within a legal system that is racially neutral.

Ummah translates itself as nation from the Arabic.

I prefer this version of nationhood.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah

That is so much better than ethno-nationalism which proposes the forcible repatriation of non-white British citizens, apartheid or racial privileges, which only makes nationalists feared, hated and despised for being socially retarded and politically unrealistic.

Racially neutral but radical civic nationalism will be quite exciting enough.  Please do not think it is going to be boring just because you find UKIP and the English Democrats deadly dull.

A definition of the National Interest , the Nation and Nationalism

The only thing that should matter for those who call themselves nationalists is whether something is for or against the national interest.

My definition of the national interest is the long term good of the nation. 

The nation consists of different groups within which there are competing interests to be wisely and fairly balanced.


It is a matter of practical politics as to whom one includes and excludes from being a member of that nation.  


Ethno-nationalism is a contradiction in terms for it is, as far as I can see, but tribalism and racial preference.  It is not working in Israel, the caste system (also based on birth origins) in India is socially divisive and pernicious, and apartheid did not work in South Africa.  The writing is therefore on the wall for these morally bankrupt ideologies who are only promoted by those who are "well born".  


Britain is still a white majority country and so whatever benefits the majority of white people could be said to be in the National Interest.

In my view, the policies that would most benefit the nation would be policies crafted to encourage the lower middle classes, ie those who aspire and those with a work ethic.  This would include the small independent businessmen, the man in the white van, the Asian owner of your local corner shop.  Policies that favour trade unions and big business are therefore against the national interest.  

This would mean a meritocratic educational system that is keen for excellence to flourish  rather than one that has an ideological imperative to impose equality of failure while hiding the failure of education in this country.  This would mean selective education, the end of mixed ability teaching, and the rigorous implementation of streaming according to ability.  


This will make the Liberal Left gnash their teeth, rend their garments and tear their hair, but we need to tell them in no uncertain terms where to go and which of their orifices they can stuff their toxic ideology up. 

The way forward is reasonably clear. To me anyway.