THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label beta male victims of feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label beta male victims of feminism. Show all posts
Two WPCs murdered with their own weapon by one man in #Liege. Do you get the impression that he was making a point about useless women in men's jobs? #feminism
Benjamin Herman doesn't sound Muslim. You can be radicalised just listening to #r4today To be radicalised is to know the government plays dirty and doesn't care about the national interest, only degenerate feminist interests only interested in cultivating failure. #Liege
That there is no resistance to the Feminist State will cause terrorism. The causes of terrorism in Muslims *and* Islamophobes are in fact the same: the Feminist State they know who is ignoring their interests and exacerbating their grievances while they are leaderless, hopeless.
Beta male victims of feminism understandably blame the Feminist State. These beta male victims of feminism can be both Muslims and Islamophobes angry at the Feminist State for neglecting their interests. Not only have their interests been marginalised, they have no leaders.
The only reason why the Feminist State is now squatting over the West is because Christianity has failed. The West is now as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human. The unofficial religion of the West now is satanism and feminism.
Because the beta male victims of feminism have no effective male leaders at all, they will increasingly do what a cornered rat will do when it is cornered: fight back in the most vicious way it can before dying. Why not? What else is there left to do? No free speech now.
It is not enough to have some theoretical right to free speech. There is no prospect of an honest debate in mainstream media capable of reaching any significant audience because Western media is already controlled by the Feminist State. To allow this would be *blasphemy*.
To prove me wrong, all the Feminist State has to do is feature a senior male establishment figure to question feminism without vilifying him. Understandably, such men will not be coming forward to criticise the Feminist State because they know how the system works.
If the senior establishment men are too afraid to challenge feminism, the media might consider allowing me to explain where they have gone wrong with the option of mocking me afterwards with the full force of global media, but they do not, do they?
The Feminist State could not have been established if Christianity had not failed. You do not deny that everything about feminism is satanic. To be satanic is to go against God's laws. If Christianity were not kaput, the West would not have gone against God's laws.
So much violence could be averted if only the Feminist State would practise its principles of allowing free speech and the free exchange of ideas. Only then would the rules be perceived not to be rigged and people have reason to hope that things will improve.
Once you admit that Christianity is kaput, then Islam is the only option. The alt-right already know this, and that is why they won't give me a platform, just like mainstream media - an entire civilisation in denial.
Logically, the option is not choosing between being NEUTRAL about something and being FOR it.
It must be between being AGAINST something and FOR it.
An attribute of feminisation in men is poor reasoning abilities and denial, a feminine vice.
If you are afraid of your enemy, you understandably refrain from making overt declarations of hostility.
Beta male victims of feminism, like women, only have the power to withhold, for they no longer have the power to strive and obtain.
This contemptible trait in cucked Western men is precisely what Muslim radicals despise.
They reasonably conclude that allowing their male offspring to marinate in the degenerate values and practices of the matriarchy would eventually result in their male descendants becoming cucked beta male victims of feminism and their female descendants becoming promiscuous women and unmarried mothers, submitting to the stinking degenerate matriarchy rather than to truth, logic and morality.
To cultures known for practising the civilising traditions of marriage and family values, the very idea that their descendants will be born illegitimate of unmarried mothers who casually conceived them and who will parent them badly is a prospect dreadful and disgraceful.
I am very much aware that what I am proposing is blasphemy in our matriarchy. There was once a time when heretics were burned. Even if this penalty is not these days inflicted, men have all sorts of considerations to take into account, eg their sex partner's wrath and their probable withdrawal of sexual access thus making domestic life uncomfortable if not insufferable.
Not having a wife or potential sex partners whom I fear will withdraw sexual access if I offend her or their political sensibilities, I am probably the best placed person in the entire West to lead the campaign to re-establish the patriarchy.
Sadly, Western Man is now so cucked he won't consider availing himself of this unmissable opportunity because he is afraid of being associated with me and my idea of imposing a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.
Wishing to wound but afraid to strike: this is a very much a feminine predicament.
The men vanquished by women would inevitably take on the mindset of their conquerors and become themselves feminised in their thinking and behaviour. Very sad. This means men really just become women with penis extensions, effectively becoming incapable of defending either a principle much less their nation. This will embolden and encourage our enemies.
Men need a safe space to discuss this amongst yourselves. Women will always want standards of sexual morality to be comfortably low because it is women who get knocked up and are left holding the baby.
Only men actually prepared to make the sacrifices of being an ANTIFEMINIST and uncompromisingly calling for the return of patriarchy through obeying the rules of marriage (ie no extramarital sex) will have the will to power.
The cucks of the West will have no concept of the heroic ideal. These days most Western men are unprincipled and spineless worms with no masculinity to insult, easily cowed by threats or persuaded by bribes, but fungible units of consumption cucked by their atheism and their indifference to principle and posterity.
They will make weak complaining noises and eventually fade away and expire without issue.
Come to think of it, men are now too cucked to even dare ask for a safe space for themselves.
If any of their number should even dare to propose this, they will be shot in the back by the cucks.
What I have described above is the reality of how cucked Western men are, is it not?
Even now they are hiding under the skirts of woman instead of doing it for yourselves.
Feminism has utterly destroyed the quality of masculinity of Western Man.
The reason why feminists demand that their countries take in migrant Muslim men is because they instinctively know they would be rather raped by them than willingly fuck or breed with such a sorry bunch of self-abnegating cucks.
Who are these European women in effect asking for Muslim migrant men to enter their countries and penetrate their vaginas? They would be the female voters of child-bearing age who voted for Macron and will be voting for Merkel this September.
Beta male victims of feminism (BMVOFs) are gentile and non-Muslim men who know their status is being lowered relative to women, Jews and Muslims because of their thraldom to fornication. They also know that their political establishment is a matriarchy and know they have no protectors amongst senior male politicians who wouldn't dream of standing up for the interests of BMVOFs, despised by middle class feminazis in government and public life. Because white middle class men in public life are afraid of white middle class feminazis in public life, these BMVOFs know they have no protectors. Why, even the BNP, won't even admit to the existence of BMVOFs and refuse them protection. There was no proposal to abolish no fault divorce by the BNP, was there? This is because so few of them are married. They too worship the slut and dare not offend her.
And so it has come to pass that pretending to be concerned about male circumcision is their effeminate and pathetic way of trying to gain status.
Their thinking is this: if gentiles and non-Muslims save the foreskins of Jewish and Muslim men, they become higher in status.
To pretend someone is in need of rescue or pity someone is of course to assert a higher status over the person who is pitied/to be rescued. It is always easier for someone defeated in argument to say "I pity you [for holding the views you do and taking the position you have because your rational arguments are indicative of a person lacking in irrationality, sentimentality and a desire to make futile gestures as a display of compassion/femininity/effeminacy]" than try to win the argument using truth, logic and morality.
@AnthonyLarme Like Paul Elam, Erin Pizzey suffers from the disability of being unable to propose slut shaming. It is the nuclear option of antifeminism.
@AnthonyLarme If you are a certain age, you prefer to go to your grave with your beliefs intact, otherwise you would have to denounce your former beliefs.
@AnthonyLarme Let's face it: people over a certain age are going to want to think things will still be OK while they live before the shit hits the fan.
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey As a political activist, Paul Elam has a duty to consider all proposals, even those he dislikes. We are not talking about the sheeple.
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey As a political activist, Erin Pizzey has a duty to consider all proposals, even those she dislikes. She can't even discuss the points I make
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey The most Erin Pizzey can do is to try to get anti-feminists to ignore me and my propsals. Hardly rational or honourable, is it?
@AnthonyLarme Even if a proposed talk by me attracts the attention of the authorities and the conference cannot take place, the point will have been made.
@AnthonyLarme What I propose concerns all the men and women of the world. If I were allowed to make my point, reasonable and moral men would agree with me
@AnthonyLarme You are not planning to make them on my behalf either online or at the conference. More than your job's worth. What about you, @DoctorEuge?
@AnthonyLarme I tried to get people to find out from Mike Buchanan precisely why he objected to me, but it seems he is unable to articulate his reasons.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd be discussing how a one party theocracy would defeat feminism.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it could be discussing how God was invented to fight the matriarchy.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd be discussing how fornication distracts men/women from marriage
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd b discussing how fornication distracts men/women from parenting
@DoctorEuge That is why I need to be there so they get my message loud and clear. MGTOWs are a manifestation of the matriarchy and part of the problem.
@DoctorEuge It is so repulsively effeminate and hypocritical for gentile and non-Muslim MRAs to pretend to care about the foreskins of Jews and Muslims.
@DoctorEuge I don't see how. People will think the beta male victims of feminism are just being antisemitic and Islamophobic, as they always have been.
@DoctorEuge It's the easiest thing to distinguish betwn FGM and male circumcision: the former prevents the victim from enjoying sex, the latter doesn't.
@DoctorEuge You have more or less admitted that your desire to ban male circumcision is to annoy Jews and Muslims. You mistakenly think this is winnable
@DoctorEuge The purpose of FGM is to prevent the female from enjoying sex so she won't be a slut. I will explain it to you as many times as you require.
@DoctorEuge I am afraid who we are is related to how *others* regard us and is nothing to do with what we think we are entitled to eg respect, sex etc.
@DoctorEuge With the young who say they do not care about each other's social status, attractiveness to others in their age group defines their status.
@DoctorEuge Beta males victims of feminism have no alpha male leader to protect their interests, only other beta males like Paul Elam and Warren Farrell
@DoctorEuge Why won't beta male victims of feminism find an alpha male leader? Cos beta "leaders" like Paul Elam/Mike Buchanan don't want that to happen
@DoctorEuge Beta male leaders like Paul Elam and Mike Buchanan want to hang on to whatever leadership role they managed to acquire even if they are crap
@DoctorEuge No man with alpha male qualities would want to risk his status to protect a bunch of losers ie unmarriageable beta male victims of feminism.
@DoctorEuge Because Paul Elam is repulsively beta. He is mediocre n vulgar. He probably has a girlfriend he doesn't want to upset by promoting my ideas.
@DoctorEuge I am the closest you men are going to get with leadership qualities, but you won't have me because I am female, and are scared of my ideas.
@DoctorEuge Karen Straughan is not going to inspire men. She's not even married and is in an irregular relationship. She won't discuss my ideas either.
@DoctorEuge If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution is patriarchy. Displays of Islamophobia and antisemitism by gentiles do not help their cause
