THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
I am just in the chat here so don't bother clicking on it if you only want to hear my voice.
THE HEAVY CENSORSHIP OF MILLENNIAL WOES
You won't be able to find a single comment of mine posted on live chat though I posted many. I have been hidden by Millennial Woes who exercises ferocious censorship. What is he afraid of? What the hell is he afraid of?!
A little background of the "history" of Millennial Woes and me
War and revolution are the most destructive forms of violence which the matriarchy could prevent, just by answering our questions. Not answering them suggests they have something to hide. Blatantly refusing to answer them with an insult shows their undisguised contempt for us. https://t.co/ZaEFOaCvP2
In a murder trial, you hear both sides: the case for the Prosecution and the case for the Defence. All you seem to have is the victim narrative with the feminist agenda of undermining marriage and making marriage an even worse bargain for men.
There are sociopathic, psychopathic, violent, murderous and evil men. Women should be warned to stay clear of them rather than be told by @CoCoAwareness that when they enter into toxic relationships that end in them and their children being murdered, there is someone to blame.
Since marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy, there is obviously a feminist agenda to undermine marriage and patriarchy with the consequence that your society, nation and civilisation will be undermined. This is what is happening now, in case you haven't noticed.
Marriage is the arena in which the eternal battle of sexes takes place. You can get peace through submission, dominance or the rational and moral resolution of conflicts. The purpose and effect of the victimhood narrative is to make marriage an even worse bargain for men.
I'm well aware sociopathic/psychopathic/violent/murderous/evil men don't come with a tattoo on their foreheads. That's why a period of courtship is necessary. To this end I asked @CoCoAwareness how long their mother knew their father before she married him. They refuse to answer.
Not only did @CoCoAwareness refuse to answer the question @Sarah_Montague did not ask them, she actually liked the tweets insulting me for daring to ask the question that she did not ask: how long did their mother know their father before marrying him?
This was the insulting tweet Sarah Montague liked because, clearly, the Hart Brothers didn't want to answer my question, probably because they knew answering my question honestly would undermine their position. https://t.co/u4IJZg5wiW
The Hart Brothers are good looking young men, aren't they? Doubtless taking the position they have in so public a manner would attract much female attention and, most probably, groupies.
You don't make much sense to be honest. Are you a groupie and a member of the unofficial harem of the Hart Brothers, if they do indeed have one? I really can't work you out.
I actually agreed with you that men don't have a tattoo on their foreheads saying they are going to abusive towards you. For some reason, you boasted about a convicted prisoner proposing to you from prison before saying you were trying to educate me. That doesn't make sense.
Just because we are more likely to be murdered by a family member or sex partner, does this mean we are not to have spouses or family members? Surely not! There are already laws against murder and assault, and marriage is a child protection scheme.
I am well aware that feminism has caused gender relations to become toxic. You do know that everything about feminism undermines marriage, don't you? Feminists have the stated agenda of destroying the patriarchy and patriarchy cannot exist without marriage.
You are probably already aware of the fact that the Labour Party is socialist and socialists believe in gender equality. That's why the most militant feminists are in the Labour Party and that is why Hart Brothers are pandering to these women who are probably part of their harem.
If you make marriage an even worse bargain for men, then you undermine marriage. Marriage is already a terrible bargain for men and you seek to make it even worse when all you need to do is tell women not to be such stupid sluts getting knocked up by losers and psychos.
Would "groupie" be a more respectful term? In an Islamic State, men may have up to four wives, but only if they can treat them equally and if they can provide for them. I imagine many gullible women throw themselves at the Hart Brothers. I guess this is a perk of their position.
I see you are avoiding the question! We can get domestic peace by submitting utterly to the dominant partner. I cannot imagine that you are not the dominant partner and he the submissive one. If it works for you, fine, but it may not work for every man.
I didn't say that violence must be inflicted. I asked "*If* women are to be beaten at all, it is better that they are beaten by their husbands and male family members rather than strange men, surely?"
If a woman had to suffer rape, it is surely better to be raped by her husband than by a serial sex offender she does not know, surely? It is also marginally better to date raped than to be raped by a rapist jumping out from behind a bush. Are you getting my line of logic?
I am merely pointing out that not every man wishes to marry a woman and then submit to her! No need to take it so personally. What works for your husband would not work for other men and we are talking about marriage being a bad bargain for *men*.
Of course, but we must be realistic and acknowledge realities. Let us say that there will always be a certain amount of violence being inflicted on men against men and men against women. Let us say that there is a certain amount of violence to be endured by all of us,
There are ways of reducing levels of violence between men but for the moment we are talking only about violence against women by men. Violence on women by men can be inflicted by 1) their husband, 2) male members of the family, 3) men known to these women 4) complete strangers.
Let us say you have NO CHOICE but to endure violence against you by a man. From which men would you MOST PREFER to suffer violence? (You'd answer men in Category 1, surely?) From which men would you LEAST PREFER NOT to suffer violence? (You'd answer men in Category 4, surely?)
Please pay attention. I have NOT said that rape should decriminalised, have I? I have posed a HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION and you, being a typical woman, do not know what it means, or affect not to. Which is it? Are you arguing from bad faith?
I hope you know that a husband and wife are entitled to have sex from each other. Marriages have been annulled for non-consummation. The best way to get round the problem of marital rape is to stipulate in the marriage contract the frequency of sexual congress.
Once you state the frequency of sexual congress the parties have agreed to in their marriage contract, then exceeding your ration could be treated as marital rape. This is the best way of doing justice to both parties to the marriage, don't you think?
There is no point denying that violence exists inside and outside marriage. Islam, being a religion of practical wisdom, accepts this and has a way of dealing with it through a graduated process of punishment on the recalcitrant wife. This is explained at https://t.co/NAn6CARHtV
You are refusing to answer the question because you know that answering my question honestly would allow me to develop my argument, and you don't like the direction where this is going. Most unsporting of you, I must say.
Requiring engaged couples to agree a marriage contract before allowing them to marry would implicitly abolish no fault divorce, which is one my stated political goals.
You must agree with me that it is impossible to eradicate violence against women by men because we do not live in a perfect world. It is possible to reduce violence against women but it is impossible for it to eradicated completely. I have no idea why you find this controversial.
I am just saying that it is worse for women to suffer violence inflicted by men who are strangers to them eg invading migrants and marauding soldiers who are raping and pillaging. Again, I have no idea why you find this so controversial.
Why are you pretending that I am *for* "murder, rape and women being beaten"? I suppose that is you arguing in bad faith again and trying to traduce and demonise me so you can ignore everything I have just said.
Feminism causes immigration. Your cucked men and cucked male politicians are completely helpless to stop this now. Brexit is a male preoccupation, remain a female one. The BBC is just the Voice of the Matriarchy.
If Britain were a society of married fathers in control of their women and families, men would not be putting up with uncontrolled immigration for a minute, but they are men who have been orphaned from their traditions and deprived of their fathers by their unmarried mothers.
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies. All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. Patriarchy is the lesser evil. Our moral obligation is to chose the lesser evil.
The facts are all around you. A clueless childless woman is our Prime Ministrix. Feminists have infiltrated and now run all the important institutions of state. All our male politicians are useless hopeless cucks who have become women. The invaders continue to invade.
You voted to remain, didn't you? All the people you know voted to remain. You are happy senior male MPs are too cucked and helpless to implement Brexit. You want even more uncontrolled immigration to show your contempt for the men of your race in the class below you.
The Matriarchy is short-termist. May is clueless about the concerns of married parents and cares nothing for them. The worst thing is that the men in her cabinet are just as indifferent and clueless, even the married ones like @michaelgove who is a bastard, right, @BorisJohnson?
1:06:00 Men are now afraid to express their political views in their own home and become "servile" towards wives, probably hating themselves and then, when their wives get... https://t.co/o2ZZZV5MT7
"... bored and irritated with them anyway and divorce them under the rules of no fault divorce, they suddenly see red and end up murdering their wives and children."
Our matriarchy was the result of the disease of the mind that is feminism eating away at the spine of patriarchy. When you talk about "female autonomy and freedom", you mean the right of women to fornicate, and the right of men to fornicate with them. Fornication is a mortal sin.
If you want to prevent crime, then prevent bastardy. If you want to prevent bastardy, then you have to shame sluts. Once you shame sluts and discourage bastardy, you will find yourself with a lower crime rate, thereby lowering the levels of violence against men by men. https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1
A slut is a fornicatress. An unmarried mother is definitely a fornicatress because the evidence of her fornication has been born and is in existence. The chief characteristic of a slut is the poor reproductive choices she makes eg choosing men who beat/murder them/their children. https://t.co/ozxvNHEBH1
A slut is by definition stupid, because she makes bad bargains and sells herself too cheaply. The soldiers of feminism are sluts. Since most Western women are feminists, this perfectly explains the progressive lowering of Western IQ. https://t.co/CEfFYQufxp
Millennial Woes, banned by Twitter, praises Twitter and its functionalities eg retweets, notifications. It is "the heartbeat of the world connected to a web of social activity so you can effortlessly digest and interact with it - an incredible invention." https://t.co/5vLRuhUSQy
Millennial Woes on the "psychological abuse" inflicted on him by Twitter when his account was permanently suspended, the unspeakable horror of watching his followers go from thousands to zero, his disbelief and astonishment, the yo-yoing of his emotions from resignation to rage.
This would allow the state to keep tabs on public opinion and formulate public policy on this basis, dispensing with the need for public relations consultants and polling organisations like @YouGov who have behaved disgracefully by transparently displaying overt pro-EU bias.
Trump is not able to do what he wants to do because he is operating in the conditions of a matriarchy. If he were operating in a patriarchy, he would have built the wall by now. A patriarchy is a society of beta males led by an alpha male. This means beta males get to choose their leader without interference by single mother voters who are half the population who don't care about uncontrolled immigration and who keep voting Democrat or Labour. This means narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only. Currently, all political parties in the West have to appeal to the female voter or not alienate them to be voted into office.
PROPOSAL: Western Man is brave enough to propose and support the narrowing of the franchise to taxpayers only, instead of hopelessly and secretly yearning and waiting for pogrom and race war.
A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.
A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers.
The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents
The only way to paint a picture of your preferred political landscape is to give people an idea of what the new rules will be. It needs to be more than Greg Johnson's proposed pogrom and UKIP proposing internment camps for Muslims to galvanise enough educated and influential men already in the political establishment into restoring the patriarchy. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6196159/UKIP-calls-Muslim-prisons-stop-extremists-converting-fellow-inmates.html
My interview of Greg Johnson is below.
1:10:00 All self-respecting ideologies seek global domination eg Marxism, Christianity, Islam, capitalism, liberal democracy.
1:17:00 Muslims actually hate Secular Koranism because they don't think people who are not Muslim have a right to use the Koran. The white man will claim that Secular Koranism is their interpretation of the Koran and in this way claim the Koran and use its ideas to restore their patriarchy. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/a-muslim-who-hates-secular-koranism.html
You will not be required to bow to anything. Secular Koranism is a legal system which guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256, not a belief system and does not mean forced conversion to Islam, which you seem to assume it must entail! Remember, I am not Muslim.
What I am trying to say is that you can kick out all the Muslims and still practise Secular Koranism. Indeed, you are more likely to be able to kick out all the people you want to kick out under Secular Koranism than continuing to reject it.
Yesterday I had a strike from YouTube disabling me from streaming for three months. I have appealed against the strike, but am not particularly hopeful.
It would appear that I was given a strike simply for having Hitler in the title of the video ie "Hitler's category error".
I was pointing out that the behaviour he attributed to Jews was in fact shared by anyone who refuses to admit he or she has lost the argument and that we have all of us done this at some time in our lives, including me and my mother.
I was not saying "Hitler was right about the Jews", I was in fact saying Hitler attributed to Jews behaviour that is common to all of us. While I was still editing the description under the video explaining this, I discovered I could no longer post because the video had been removed. This happened within one hour of posting.
If you are Jewish with a YouTube channel that you never use and don't mind getting a strike - it just means you cannot stream for three months on your channel- it would be much appreciated if you would read the following, from towards the end of Chapter 2 Years of Suffering and Studying in Vienna Mein Kampf:
At the outset they [the Marxists] counted upon the stupidity of their opponents; but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks to logic, they acted as if they could not under the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point, they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a sold mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to given in to your argument, on account of observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. He would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday's defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me more - the abundance of their privilege or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them.
In the description of your video, please post:
A category mistake (or category error) is a logical fallacy that occurs when a speaker (knowingly or not) confuses the properties of the whole with the properties of a part. It contains the fallacy of composition (assuming the whole has the properties of the part) and the fallacy of division (assuming the part has the properties of the whole). It is an imprecision fallacy and an informal fallacy.
Examples:
Confusing (knowingly or not) the Muslim immigrants in their country whom they hate with a book they will never read ie the Koran.
Confusing (knowingly or not) Muslim immigrants in their country whom they hate with the terrorists that they fear who have been provoked by the imperialistic foreign policy of their governments.
Confusing (knowingly or not) the consequence of following clear instructions badly or not at all with the correctness of the instruction. (Is your doctor a bad doctor if you do not follow his orders? Is your satnav faulty if you ignore its directions? Is your map wrong if you misread it?)
Confusing (knowingly or not) the symptoms ie immigrants with the disease ie feminism.
The title of the video should be "Hitler's Category Error".
That's it, basically, because that was all I did, and I got a strike.
If you get a strike, it means the following:
You don't enjoy Jewish privilege.
There could be an algorithm that automatically flags any video which mentions Hitler or the Nazis.
If you don't get a strike, it could mean the following:
You do enjoy Jewish privilege.
No one is trying to get you for hate speech the way they are trying to get me.
YouTube has revised its policies on its draconian censorship on discussion of the causes and consequences of WW2 as well as the discussion of continuing imperialistic wars in Muslim lands that provoke Muslim terrorism against both Jew and gentile in the West.
Before Hitler was going on about Jews in that chapter, he was complaining about his fellow workmen but is rather more indulgent and forgiving of their foibles.
In my relations with my fellow workmen I was often astonished to find how easily and often they changed their opinions on the same questions, sometimes within a few days and sometimes within the course of a few hours. I found it difficult to understand how men who always had reasonable ideas when they spoke as individuals with one another suddenly lost this reasonableness the moment they acted in the mass. That phenomenon often tempted one almost to despair. I used to dispute with them for hours and when I succeeded in bringing them to what I considered a reasonable way of thinking I rejoiced at my success. But next day I would find that it had been all in vain. It was saddening to think that I had to begin it all over again. Like a pendulum in its eternal sway, they would fall back into their absurd opinions.
BEST CASE SCENARIO
1. Yoram Hazony whose book The Virtue of Nationalism is out and who has a YouTube channel will be prepared to do this. That would certainly make the gentile nationalist of the West sit up and take notice of him and perhaps buy his book.
2. Melanie Phillips who is a Trump supporter and Brexiteer may wish to open a YouTube account and do exactly the same thing to test the waters her end.
Please. Our free speech is also your free speech.
The diversity of the races who do support support Trump and want to leave the EU will be our strength. (In the UK, Muslim-majority areas of Birmingham, Bradford and Luton voted to leave.)
We've temporarily limited some of your account features
Claire Khaw
@MinimumSt8
What happened?
We have determined that you have violated the Twitter Rules, so we’ve temporarily limited some of your account features. While in this state, you can still browse Twitter, but you’re limited to only sending Direct Messages to your followers — no Tweets, Retweets, or likes. Your account will be restored to full functionality in:
11 hours and 58 minutes.
Once the Muslim Council is completely feminised and yuppified by young Muslim professionals who want to be part of the Metropolitan elite, they will do exactly what our neoliberal and neocon overlords dictate to our non-Muslim liberal establishment - yay! https://t.co/4xmkyIbf2V
I have already proposed there should be a Register and Registrar of Jews to exclude unobservant Jews who only become turbo-charged liberals with undeserved Jewish privileges. All Jews would be observant Jews and those who cannot bring themselves to be observant become gentile.
For some reason, the liberal media want to pretend that only white people are racist and xenophobic when the truth is that everyone gets unsettled when they see too much change too quickly. Only the most foolish fool believes that someone of your own race would not do you harm.
Jews actually come in four colours but are still Jews if they follow the same rules. This means that it is not how they look that is important but what rules they follow that make them a people. The badges of identity are language, territory, religion and race.
Plenty of non-white citizens in Western countries also find it disturbing that Western governments are just letting anyone in. I have not said to you that I find anything problematic, have I?
I think all countries have to decide one way or another how to deal with their women, each other and minorities. Obviously, the countries with the best system would have the fairest system where most people are happy.
For example, I could be on my own going about my business not thinking about my identity at all, but suddenly you come along. It is only when you enter my territory that I think of myself as myself and of you as you and wonder how to interact with you.
We only define ourselves against the other. E Michael Jones said white people in America are basically Jews, Catholics and Protestants. In the South white people define themselves against blacks, in the North Catholics would define themselves against Protestants and Jews.
It is not really sophistry. Jews logically and necessarily attribute their peoplehood to Judaism. If you want to stay in existence as a distinct people, you too have to create your own moral system and stick to it.
I think politicians have a habit of absentmindedly laying wreathes here, there and everywhere if they are asked to do so, just to be polite. https://t.co/Rw7w9x4Ytg
Or worse, is the Muslim Council a front for professional Muslims who think they have joined the remaining Metropolitan liberal elite? https://t.co/J0IkUmgh4U
I was not aware that I have photographs and memes of Hitler on my Facebook page. I certainly do not think as you do that Jews are beyond criticism. Are you Jewish?
All you can hope for is that they do not get to conduct the pogrom that they want to conduct since they do not need your approval or your recognition of their right to exist and their right to hold the views that they do. Good government is a way of avoiding civil disorder.
"the question becomes ... whether their nation ought to exist. And it should be easy to see that the nation described above ought not to exist, as one of its core commitments is white supremacy."
But these people already do exist and they live in nations.
The more Jews carry on accusing Corbyn of antisemitism, the more they generate antisemitism. Is it illegal for Jews to negligently, recklessly or intentionally incite hatred against themselves? https://t.co/V8hiqYPWWx
Remainers realise their tactical error in getting all those Uncle Tom Muslims to complain about Boris to frighten him into apologising so he loses status. https://t.co/xpb0YHEVBN
Still trying to sabotage Brexit and stop people from complaining about immigration. You are not going to make people stop hating you when you tell them they can't even complain about you. Jews and Muslims seem to be labouring under this misapprehension. https://t.co/xpb0YHEVBN
Gosh. Did I just create White Peoplehood out of nothing? What a clever girl I must be! If only I were clever enough to know when my genius will finally be acknowledged.
Once a group is created, its members must acquire group consciousness to perpetuate the existence of the group. A narrative as to the origins of the group would have to be created and members of this group would be expected to know this. A moral system would have to be imposed.
Spaniards and Italians are people groups relating to people in Spain and Italy. White nationalists presumably inhabit space and territory eg US, UK, France, Germany, Ireland etc
This is actually delightful. Thank you, @BorisJohnson, for giving us Brexiteers this. Perhaps some enterprising soul will turn this burka-ed pillar box into a key ring or something. https://t.co/Bq7ngRbIU1
These Muslims - who have become engineers, management consultants and the like - think they have joined the Metropolitan liberal elite. The majority of non-elite non-liberal Muslims want to leave, just like everyone else. @miqdaad@MuslimCouncil@BorisJohnson@Mohammed_Amin
"It's amazing the numbers of otherwise well-educated and well-heeled UK Muslims who are posting pro-Remain, pro-Corbyn, pro-burka/niqab, and anti-BoJo stuff on my postings. I suppose they only read The Guardian and only talk to people who think as they do. Sadly, really."
Are you saying that white people have no means of giving effect to their aspiration to have an ethnostate unless they become Catholic? E Michael Jones would agree with you.
You give white people peoplehood if you say things like #cancelwhitepeople as @sarahjeong did. She at least acknowledges their existence by wishing to "cancel" them. You seem to be saying that their aspiration to be rid of the people who want to cancel them has no legitimacy.
One might be forgiven for disliking immigrants who come to your country and then stop you from complaining about them, surely? Or is one supposed to accept this sort of thing without question or protest? How stupid exactly does the government think leave voters are?
To complain about immigration and criticise Muslim immigrants, especially menacing masked Muslim women that one finds sinister makes one "Far Right", does it? https://t.co/YivrczgszM
The odd one out is Christianity which requires Christians to believe in the obscenity and absurdity that Christ is the co-equal of the omnipotent and eternal Abrahamic God.
Marriageable men who aspire to become fathers of legitimate offspring and want to parent them properly/men who aspire to become marriageable would support patriarchy. Feminists and their running dogs - men with no intention/prospect of becoming married fathers - would oppose this
Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy those of unmarried mothers who tend to have variously fathered illegitimate offspring whom they badly parent creating a burgeoning criminal and parasitic class we ignore at our peril.
The Culture War should be between British men of all races and religions prepared to restore the patriarchy and British men of all races and religions who oppose the restoration of the patriarchy.
Only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest. We currently live in a matriarchy where all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother with variously fathered illegitimate offspring. https://t.co/ULgThun4Wf
Does Harun Rashid Khan, a Londoner born and bred, who has been a Civil Engineer in the city for over two decades, regard himself as a member of the London Metropolitan elite? Is this why the MCB so easily falls in with its wishes? https://t.co/6CtuLeWwy6
"The vast majority of jobs on offer in Luton are low-skilled. Both white and Muslim Asian communities are worried by the wage depression caused by Eastern European migration."https://t.co/upQFQ0ce6w
"In all 36,708 people in Luton voted for remain, 47,773 for leave (56%). Luton’s total turnout was 84,636 (66.32%) - 70,337 of those votes were made at polling stations."
The Secretary General is Harun Rashid Khan, a second generation Muslim. He has led on delivering the annual Muslim Leadership Dinner attended by Muslim leaders, politicians and civil society leaders.
In April 2007, the MCB formally declared its support for the Equality Act, which outlaws discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. The journalist Brian Whitaker said: "the Muslim Council of Britain has begun to move towards accepting homosexuality".
The Muslim Council is in the pocket of the government and knows that it has to keep doing the government's bidding to continue to receiving government funding. The government wants to sabotage Brexit and expects the Muslim Council to do its bidding.
MCB received £150,000 of public money from the Government: the MCB leadership development programme; the MCB leadership mentoring programme; MCB direct, a web portal for information on Islam and Muslims; a British citizenship programme, and the British Muslim Equality Programme. https://t.co/OliwrtAKXh
It should be a matter of some concern for those who care about the future of this country that so many men are so ready to admit that they are just not up to the job of restoring the patriarchy.
Christians could maintain their dominance even with their idolatrous religion as long as they practised marriage and family values. Now they are being eaten alive by the parasitic feminism suffering from the double whammy of a failed religion and a failed political system.
Only one learned scholarly Jew has debated Secular Koranism with me at https://t.co/0jWvgjrZpe I hope others of appropriate seniority will find the courage to come forward.
There remains only one obvious solution and that is Secular Koranism which satisfies the requirements of being simultaneously secular and theocratic as well as being in non-idolatrous harmony with the Noahide laws. https://t.co/7kXcwYUj1N
Jews who find themselves encouraging gentile Westerners to practise the idolatry of Christianity which requires Christians to believe in the obscenity and blasphemy that Christ is the co-equal of their God, they are in violation of their own laws and guilty of Chillul Hashem.
Despite being people ahead of other races in using their powers of deduction, Jews have not deduced that in a failed state, minorities will get it in the neck. Any Jew encouraging the gentile Westerner to stick with kaput Christianity is obviously guilty of malign encouragement.
Jews are now too cowardly to discuss whether Christianity or Islam is closer to conforming to the Noahide laws even when the answer is perfectly obvious. https://t.co/h6V6qQcbQP
Rabbi Sacks won't discuss the Noahide laws and why it is the religious duty of Jews to ensure gentile nations do not fall dangerously below its minimum moral standards. Jews are too afraid of pointing out the idolatry of Christianity and neglect another Jewish obligation.
Jews make it their business to make sense of their suffering. It is the easiest thing to imagine God sending Muslims to plague the Post-Christian who still insists on claiming that the West is Christian. The West is as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human.
You would have thought Jews and Muslims would get together and say "Christians, if you still exist, you don't really believe in this, do you? Clergy who claim to believe in this absurdity only do so to keep your jobs as Pope, Archbishop and Bishop to sustain your parasitism."
Is Spain making a mistake receiving unprecedented number of migrants? https://t.co/1aE8JtaNJC Spain has finally become a stinking degenerate matriarchy under its socialist government.
If you are prepared to believe that Christ is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God, you are too credulous. If you are prepared to *lie* that you believe this, you are morally corrupt. For how many centuries have Christians been force-feeding this obscenity and absurdity on humanity?
The New Testament really says nothing about nationhood. It is only the Old Testament and the Koran that have clearly stated principles about nationhood. The problem of Christianity is its absurd and obscene requirement to believe that Christ is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God. https://t.co/jbjMck0fXm
I know sustained and focused political effort and rational debate is not one of the strengths of people who only have unskilled manual to offer that no rational employer would want to accept.
It is obvious that people are understandably unsettled by uncontrolled immigration but the liberal elite think they can keep shutting us up by calling us evil Nazi Fascist racists.
Plenty of non-white citizens in the West are also concerned about immigration but the Bastard, Bugger and Bitch Broadcasting Corporation keep pretending we don't exist. @BBCPaulMoss will know exactly what I am talking about. https://t.co/jh6ZIleOhR
The BNP invited me to join when the EHRC were forcing them to have non-white members. https://t.co/8wBdCsE4jV I thought it would be rude to refuse, and haven't looked back since.
Everyone gets expelled eventually from the BNP, including its leaders, so I am in good company. I think of myself as middle class and don't approve of marches, actually, but the plebs like this sort of thing, and they don't exactly hang on my every word, do they?
The BNP and NF are basically plebs who find it hard to compete against foreign workers even in the field of unskilled manual labour. These leaderless white men are actually proclaiming white inferiority.
You are avoiding the question because you voted to remain. Being a remainer you would wish to sabotage Brexit. Since Steve Bannon wants to destroy the neoliberal project that is the EU, you would wish to demonise him by calling him Far Right.
Probably, non-white citizens and Jews inclined to support national sovereignty and patriarchy in the country of their forefathers think it is in their interests to practice malign encouragement on the white man to deliberately weaken him. This is both dishonourable and immoral.
My advice to Jews/Muslims/minorities who are citizens of Western nations is to support the white man's desire for national sovereignty and the restoration of the patriarchy. They won the US Presidential election/EU referendum after all. Libtards are on the wrong side of history.
Remainers either support neoliberalism or are indifferent to its consequences on their countrymen. The EU is a feminazi protection scheme. In short, the liberal elite are the only ones who think they can suffer the disease of the mind that is feminism and continue in existence.
Secular Koranism is really an atheist's argument for a theocracy. It is multi-layered, internally consistent and is a moral system that I hope will in time be adopted globally for the advancement of human civilisation.
Ndora comes to the rescue of libtards who get into difficulties in a debate with me. She provides them with their excuse they so desperately need to disengage while spreading my fame!
Whatever political position you think you represent, you should not tell blatant lies in the hope of winning the argument. It only discredits your cause, whatever you think it is. I understand UKIP most closely represents your views.
I really wasn't aware of Steve Bannon saying anything that would put him in the category of being a white supremacist. I do know that the BBC are anxious to tar Brexiteers with that brush to demonise, discredit and marginalise us, even when we are the majority.