Translate

Showing posts with label Greg Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greg Johnson. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 April 2019

Comparative religion, Andrew Yang , Greg Johnson and UBI



I join from 2:49:00



Thursday, 22 November 2018

Greg Johnson, "Freedom of Speech"



Free speech is the right to speak truth to power, however much they hate it, as long as it is true.

It is not the non-whites who are stopping white men from organising against their matriarchy. The way forward is not to pass more legislation, but to repeal affirmative action legislation which is totalitarian thoughtcrime legislation.  It is easy to say it, so why don't white men just say that? Because this would upset the feminists and this means it would upset most women to whom white men seek sexual access. When white men finally acknowledge that what they fear most is losing sexual access to immoral women, they will finally realise that the problem is between their ears and their legs, not Jews/Muslims/non-whites.

State education and state schools in the West have abysmal standards because of the low quality of parenting and behaviour of each successive generation of school children, badly parented by their unmarried mothers. The only way of decisively dealing with unmarried motherhood is to shame sluts with quran.com/24/2. If you disagree, what other practical measure is there that might work, short of slut-shaming?

The left whose viewpoint is supported by immoral and stupid women indulge in their extremism because the men are too cucked to push back.

Even Jews come in four colours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_Israel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaifeng_Jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochin_Jews
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

If Judaism - the most powerful form of ethno-nationalism - cannot keep Jews looking white, what hope is there for the rest of us who reject the restrictions of Orthodox Judaism? This means only the divine civic nationalism of Islam is possible for gentiles.

What the white man is suffering from is not really white genocide but a catastrophic loss of status in his own lands because the rest of the world knows that the white man is lower in status than the unmarried mother in his matriarchy.

Using Secular Koranism to restore the patriarchy would make life for white men in the West much more bearable.

Muslim men in these debates on immigration often point out to me that in the UAE, the indigenous are actually outnumbered by their foreign workers, but the locals are, oh, so happy with this state of affairs because they are so tolerant and Muslim, blah blah blah.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expatriates_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates

But we know the real reason, don't we, Greg?  You wouldn't mind being outnumbered by any number of non-whites provided they showed you the proper degree of deference and did their jobs you hired them to do well.

There is no hope at all of getting anything done if you do not have the male solidarity that is necessary for the male cooperation you need to deal with your internal and external enemies, including conduct your proposed pogrom. There is no hope of dealing with your external enemies at all if the rest of the world perceives you to be cucked by your immoral and promiscuous women who are unmarried and bad mothers to your next generation because this means will just get stupider and weaker and easier to exploit and invade.




IQ Scores Are Falling in "Worrying" Reversal of 20th Century Intelligence Boom
https://www.sciencealert.com/iq-scores-falling-in-worrying-reversal-20th-century-intelligence-boom-flynn-effect-intelligence

Tuesday, 20 November 2018

I complain about Greg Johnson



Sorry about it ending rather abruptly when I was talking about white genocide, but I am sure you get the gist of it. I don't know why that keeps happening.

The bit you missed was me complaining that he says he is too busy to discuss Heidegger and authenticity with me.

UK needs migration because Britons are 'so bloody stupid', says peer who wrote Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/18/pro-eu-peer-lord-kerr-says-uk-needs-migration-because-britons-ar/?fbclid=IwAR2pyzp7uZlT7Lw8nMEj4nYvbo0MUR0E1bY6_9F190ZMKLOemcvXfZjP7vQ

Fathers are sleazy and mothers are lazy: What foreign au pairs REALLY think of British parents
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

https://quran.com/24/2

https://quran.com/2/275-285?translations=20

White Nationalism is a busted flush if White Nationalists refuse to discuss what religion to follow post-pogrom
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/white-nationalism-is-busted-flush-if.html

Greg Johnson and I talk about sex and his latest book



Monday, 19 November 2018

Greg Johnson, "White Identity Politics: Inevitable, Necessary, Moral"



6:00  What are Conservative principles?


Stop the other races from playing the race card then.

LocalToast
good luck trying to get jews and blacks to stop that, you'd end their careers!

Bill
That'll never happen, the only way forward is Whites practicing politics in their interests, just like everyone else.

Claire Khaw
@LocalToast You just repeal all affirmative action legislation, obviously!

@Bill What Greg is advocating is even harder to do than to repealing all affirmative action legislation. Isn't it blindingly obvious that saying "All affirmative action legislation should be repealed" is easier to say in polite society than "Let us send all the Jews and non-whites back to their ancestral homelands?" Come on!

Bill
@Claire Khaw - I don't think Affirmative Action legislation can be repealed. I think it'll be more like magically declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Even though really, it was always unconstitutional, because it makes White males second class citizens.

I don't think we can fix it via system politics. I think America is either going to slowly deteriorate into a 3rd world dump, and eventually, the country is going to break up along ethnic lines.

I do think we should try to steer the rig in our favor as best we can, as long as we can. For advantage, if and when we get the opportunity to break away.


Claire Khaw
@Bill War is an extension of politics by military means, and revolution is an extension of politics by revolutionary means. Whether you choose to use persuasion or force, you will still need to convey to those you seek to persuade the nature of the bargain you wish to make with them so that the rules result in a better outcome for your potential supporters. The biggest group of potential supporters for nationalism will always be marriageable men and marriageable women, for it is these groups with long term goals that are most likely to support the restoration of the patriarchy. Only under a patriarchy would enough good strong men be produced capable of defending the national interest.


13:00 "There aren't enough fiscally conservative black people in the world to save you."  Narrow the franchise to taxpayers only then.

Arigato Cat
here's some asians


Claire Khaw
@Arigato Cat Representative democracy is too divisive, therefore become a one party state.

15:00  Obviously, the government of any nation should favour its citizens over non-citizens.

LocalToast
unless you're in the UN! hahahaha fuck i hate the UN



Claire Khaw
@LocalToast The PC people go there.


Lothar von Trotha
This is true to any person with common sense and loyalty to normal things, but to a controlled politician, "our values" (country doesn't matter, speech is the same) have always been about blah blah blah, which conveniently center around importing hordes of non-Whites to provide cheap labor and votes for (insert party).



Claire Khaw
@Lothar von Trotha This is because the West is a matriarchy leaving men fatherless, atomised and leaderless unable to cooperate to deal with the internal and external enemies of society.


17:00  The phenomenon of xenophilia is really a feminine preference.  White men have allowed white women to impose their preferences on them because the West is now a matriarchy.


24:00  It is probably a good thing for white people that they have stopped fighting the European Wars of Religion, ceased caring about whether an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God and whether to be nice or nasty to Catholics.


33:00 You are losing control of your homelands because you have lost control of your women.


35:00  Crikey, even non-whites accidentally throw out their own antiques and antiquarian books because they don't know the value of it.


Politics is really about treading the thin line between what we want to say and what it is necessary to say.

While I understand that pogrom is the preference of white nationalists and this shocks and appals the civic nationalists, in my view, the best way of going in the direction of what you want is to consider the moral and political system of how whites are to live post-pogrom.  Any vagueness, hesitation and prevarication on this matter will mean that you just won't be able to attract enough people who matter to the cause because you won't have painted a sufficiently attractive and detailed picture to capture the imagination of your potential supporters. 

I would be very happy to explain my Venn Diagram Theory of Patriarchy v Matriarchy to you when your time allows, Dr Johnson.

Sunday, 11 November 2018

The Pursuit of Happiness and the US constitution



The fool and hedonist pursues pleasure under the impression that he is pursuing happiness. The wise know that happiness can only be pursued obliquely.

We are left to discover good and evil ways of pursuing pleasure. The quickest way to ensure a minimum of morality in members of society is to have a moral system setting out what must and must not be done.  The overwhelming majority of people are not philosophers capable of rationally and morally deciding correctly what is good or evil.

If you asked a Jew, Christian or Muslim what is good or evil, he would say that evil is what God forbids in scripture. That is the only objective standard required, for all practical purposes.

The US constitution could perhaps be improved by substituting the "happiness" that is the pursuit of the American with "justice". That would improve his character, his society and the world around him.

Sunday, 4 November 2018

Philosophical comments under Greg Johnson's philosophical videos




Is it a mistake to pursue happiness?

Is pursuing pleasure pursuing happiness?

Does all pleasure lead to happiness?

Is US Declaration of Independence wrong in encouraging Americans to pursue happiness, when so many would take it to mean the pursuit of pleasure ie hedonism?

If we were immortal, would we be infinitely immoral because the worst that mortals fear - an early and unnatural death - would be removed?

Are we only moral because we fear the consequences of not being moral?

Is the purpose of law to limit our immorality?

Is the purpose of religion to give us moral principles?

If we are just, we create justice. If we are unjust, we create injustice. If we are good, we would want to be just. If we are wise, we would know that being just creates the justice that we would benefit from and adds to the total fund of human virtue, while being unjust depletes it.  

Is Life Really Worth Living?
The Book of Ecclesiastes

Talking about Hegel, National Socialism was a synthesis of what Hitler supposed was the long-term German national self-interest - war and empire - and the principles of state socialism.  

Happiness is an end in itself.  

Courage is the means to the end of the implementation and success of some risky undertaking.

Moderation is the means to the end of protecting our long term well-being. 

Justice is an end in itself.  

Truth is the means to the end of Justice since Justice relies on Truth.



Is it a mistake to pursue happiness?

Is pursuing pleasure pursuing happiness?

Does all pleasure lead to happiness?

Is US Declaration of Independence wrong in encouraging Americans to pursue happiness, when so many would take it to mean the pursuit of pleasure ie hedonism?



12:00  Religion is just bad science? But science is the study of material objects and natural phenomenon while religion is about morality. Engineering is not a substitute for philosophy.



20:00 Edina of AbFab is The Last Man posited by Nietzsche who cannot conceive of anything more important than herself. Does this mean she is a narcissist, sociopath, a psychopath and ultimately immoral and evil?  Or is this just a grandiose way of referring to someone who is selfish, spoilt and silly?

24:00  "God is the lynchpin of moral, values and culture. When God is erased, the boundaries of things are erased." This explains liberal extremism and why they ignore their own rules and have no innate sense of justice.  When you no longer follow your religion, you no longer follow any moral principles.  Atheists who claim they follow their own moral principles will always be coming up against other atheists whose moral principles are in conflict with theirs with no moral system gaining any moral authority over enough people to impose the rule of law and by extension moral order. 

Therefore God as even a hypothetical supreme authority is useful even to atheists, because atheists also want to enjoy the benefits of not living in a declining civilisation descending into chaos, irrationality and criminality.



38:00 MISTAKES  - If we had religious principles we would attribute our mistakes to the breaking of these principles. No religion, no objective morality and no awareness of immorality and the cause of our mistakes.


Eternal Recurrence is only for people who have no real regrets or who have come to terms with their mistakes.


The heroic age is when your nation has a low average age.

The age of senescence is when the birth rate declines and your society is feminised.

20:00  What is our "condition" and what is our "predicament"? That we are fallible and have a tendency to err, presumably.  We choose to become wise to avoid falling into error. Moral principles give us a range of permissible actions which are intended to prevent us from falling into error.

But what does it mean when the good suffer? The Panglossian view is that we live in the best of all possible worlds even if the good suffer, because God will always have a good reason for everything that happens and is said to move in mysterious ways. If the good do suffer unjustly, their belief in an omnipotent and perfectly moral God who will put things right in the next life or afterlife will give those who believe comfort giving them the capacity to bear their sufferings with fortitude.

If the individual is comforted by this belief, then surely would a nation. If an individual's behaviour is better regulated with religion, then surely would a nation and preferably all nations of the world in order to minimise bad behaviour, error and disaster.

The foolish imperialistic Europeans have behaved like the Ancient Greeks and exhausted themselves in war. America became the New Rome and is now declining.

Is moral regeneration possible for declining empires? Yes, but only through war and revolution and, last but not least, repentance. The least we can do is learn from our mistakes. To learn from them, we must at least acknowledge them.

Jews have an excellent 4 stage process of repentance. https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-teshuvah-2076801

Tuesday, 16 October 2018

My application to be on Millenniyule 2018



MY APPLICATION

Claire Khaw has been promoting Secular Koranism since 2009 believing this to be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and morally regenerating a degenerate civilisation. The government supporting marriage and family values through 

1) the shaming of sluts and the men who cannot resist them by making fornication a sexual offence attracting corporal punishment as prescribed by 24: 2 of the Koran
2) abolishing no fault divorce
3) repealing the Equality Act 2010

would be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and returning the West to moral order. Unfortunately, this must mean dumping democracy and establishing a one party theocracy.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.  No pain, no gain.  

When did Britain start being a matriarchy? As long ago as 1974 when Keith Joseph criticised unmarried mothers and found Thatcher becoming Tory leader instead of him. I fear if no attempt is made to challenge the matriarchy before its 50th year, Western civilisation would end in ignominy.







Me discussing Secular Koranism with various people







Tatttoos, pre-fight hype, nationalism, the price of sex, restoring the patriarchy and environmentalism



Go to 1:37:00 if you want to know who I am complaining about at


but the best bit is before that when I discuss Christianity with Luke and Otto.

From 14:00

We discuss social media censorship. The first half of Crosstalk discusses this.


17:00  Tattoos and boxing

33:00  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista

37:00  Feminism

Trump is not able to do what he wants to do because he is operating in the conditions of a matriarchy. If he were operating in a patriarchy, he would have built the wall by now.  A patriarchy is a society of beta males led by an alpha male. This means beta males get to choose their leader without interference by single mother voters who are half the population who don't care about uncontrolled immigration and who keep voting Democrat or Labour. This means narrowing the franchise to taxpayers only. Currently, all political parties in the West have to appeal to the female voter or not alienate them to be voted into office.

PROPOSAL: Western Man is brave enough to propose and support the narrowing of the franchise to taxpayers only, instead of hopelessly and secretly yearning and waiting for pogrom and race war.

A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.
A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents

The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

The only way to paint a picture of your preferred political landscape is to give people an idea of what the new rules will be. It needs to be more than Greg Johnson's proposed pogrom and UKIP proposing internment camps for Muslims to galvanise enough educated and influential men already in the political establishment into restoring the patriarchy. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6196159/UKIP-calls-Muslim-prisons-stop-extremists-converting-fellow-inmates.html
My interview of Greg Johnson is below.



1:10:00  All self-respecting ideologies seek global domination eg Marxism, Christianity, Islam, capitalism, liberal democracy.

1:13:00  But Jews, Christians and Muslims do worship the same Abrahamic God! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

1:17:00  Muslims actually hate Secular Koranism because they don't think people who are not Muslim have a right to use the Koran. The white man will claim that Secular Koranism is their interpretation of the Koran and in this way claim the Koran and use its ideas to restore their patriarchy.  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/a-muslim-who-hates-secular-koranism.html

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV  Short quiz about Secular Koranism to clear up any misunderstandings!

You will not be required to bow to anything. Secular Koranism is a legal system which guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256, not a belief system and does not mean forced conversion to Islam, which you seem to assume it must entail! Remember, I am not Muslim.

It is believed that 2:256 in fact formed the basis of the First Amendment. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-first-amendment-was-derived-from.html

What I am trying to say is that you can kick out all the Muslims and still practise Secular Koranism. Indeed, you are more likely to be able to kick out all the people you want to kick out under Secular Koranism than continuing to reject it.

Once the patriarchy is restored ie male solidarity re-established and male co-operation made possible again, you will be able to accomplish all manner of things.

1:20:00  Flat rate income tax of 20%  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_tax#Countries_that_have_flat_tax_systems

https://www.facebook.com/Should-we-abolish-usury-351776538265174/

1:30:00  Gay sex is cheaper than straight sex.

1:36:00  Environmentalism, welfarism and a lower birth rate
How and why Brighton elected Britain's first Green MP
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2015/05/how-and-why-brighton-elected-britains.html

1:39:00  Democracy is a sacred cow that is not too late to slay.

Tuesday, 25 September 2018

Christianity and Hypocrisy

It has been said Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand. The reason why Christians are widely regarded to be the most hypocritical of all the Abrahamic faiths is because the condition of being Christian is based on claiming to believe the lie that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

In the overwhelmingly atheist societies of the West, it is hard to believe that there are any believing Christians any more. Those who affirm the Trinity and are confirmed either do not know what they are agreeing to or only do so because it is a condition of their employment as a member of the priesthood.

The Achilles heel of Christianity is its unbelievability. If you believe that Christ is also God, you are perhaps too credulous. If you only pretend to believe in it, you are corrupt. When it became legal to deny the Trinity, it was only a matter of time before the baby of Biblical morality was thrown out with the bathwater of the Trinity. There is only one religion left for gentiles who wish to restore patriarchy, sanity and moral order to the West.

The claims of Islam on our intellect alone are compelling. Muslims only have to point out that there was a Creation and therefore there must have been a Creator who has taken the trouble of making laws for us, who sent them to us in the Koran through His Messenger Mohammed.

Also, Islam would restore the patriarchy without which not enough good strong men will be produced to defend the national interest. This is certainly the case now in the West with our cowardly male politicians, with the exception of Trump, Bannon as well as the leaders of Hungary and Poland who have not allowed feminism to undermine their patriarchy. It seems Italy now is rediscovering its masculinity. Islamophobes who call themselves nationalists have no answer to the problem of restoring the patriarchy, other than to say that nationalism alone will be enough to eradicate feminism.

The truth is that they cannot think beyond the "fun" of expelling minorities with their hoped for pogrom. If they cannot answer the question of how they are to live after all the troublesome minorities have been expelled, it is because they do not think it will ever be their problem. If they live to see these minorities expelled within their lifetimes, that would be enough for them. These men are atheists, of course. Those of them who are not atheists who reject the Abrahamic faiths have a vague idea of returning to the worship of Nordic or Celtic deities.

What are the principles of nationalism other than that of the infamous pogrom? Does nationalism have a scripture beyond Mein Kampf? Greg Johnson, a gay man and an atheist, has now published The White Nationalist Manifesto (available on Kindle for as little as $3.49). It is also his intention to return Jews to their homeland as well as to send Black Americans to Africa.

https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/09/the-white-nationalist-manifesto/

White ethno-nationalists certainly now have an ethno-nationalist manifesto. What about white civic nationalists? Secular Koranism is my humble submission. It is based on the following premises:

1) If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

2) If Judaism is divine ethno-nationailsm, then Islam is divine civic nationalism.

3) Restoring the patriarchy is the only means for the West to return to moral order and this means overthrowing the matriarchy and replacing it with a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

The princples of Islam can be discovered easily because they are contained in the Koran easily accessible online and freely given out at your local mosque.

For these reasons, the undeniable Truth, Logic and Morality of using the legal system that is Secular Koranism to restore the patriarchy is simply unavoidable, unless it is your intention to avoid Truth, Logic and Morality until your country becomes a failed state.

Friday, 6 July 2018

Jew talks to the alt-right



The problem with degenerates is that they keep making category mistakes because it is a feature of degeneracy to lack reasoning skills. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Category_mistake

Basically, degenerates only respond to visual queues and their own emotions of lust, anger, gluttony, hatred, pride etc. If you try to explain the meaning of words to them - especially, for example, the difference between race and nation, or abstract ideas like truth, logic, patriarchy etc - their eyes will fall shut and their mouths open.

Some of the alt-right remind me of what Greg Johnson was saying about blacks and how they just say anything that pops into their heads without any filters.  This raises the hackles of white female voters and fills them with disgust and revulsion. The degenerate alt-right basically have a point about immigration, but the people who represent them have repulsive manners and speech and are revolting peasants. If they were Hindus they would be the Untouchables. In white society, they are called The Great Unwashed. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U9itJZM71w&t=2849s

Greg Johnson talks getting a bus in DC and being the only white person on it. "You do notice certain things about blacks. They will say whatever pops into their head, out loud. They don't have any filters."

Listening to some of them makes me think of Trailer Trash, Idiocracy, Straw Dogs and Deliverance ....

But the alt-right remain surprised that people hate them, don't care that they suffer and want to replace them with robots after warehousing them for extinction on welfare. You must already know they don't want you as their employees. If no one wants you other than the unmarried mothers who have sex with you and badly bring up your illegitimate offspring they casually conceive, I guess you have no real purpose in life and might as well not exist or be replaced by people who are prepared to work and be good employees even if they are not white.

The revulsion Johnson clearly feels for blacks is probably the same in kind and nature to the revulsion the rest of gentile white society in the West feels for the alt-right. The solution, if the alt-right ever wish to hold sway, is to keep the knuckle-dragging peasants who have no best behaviour mode because their unmarried mothers deprived them of their fathers and who keep exploding uncontrollably with antisemitic and racist rage well out of the way once a leader is found for the alt-right. Sadly, they are such omega males that no rational senior male politician would stand up for them because he knows that they will disgrace him because they cannot help themselves with their racist and antisemitic potty mouths and then shoot him in the back because they are just a bunch of angry trigger-happy morons who cannot be trusted with guns. 

Interestingly, a Jew is doing them the honour of allowing them to air their grievances on his channel even as they mock him and his religion. However, they are beginning to show him more respect now, so his patience with them is paying off.

It is interesting that it is a Jew who is doing this, isn't it?

Sunday, 22 October 2017

Millennial predictions of race war and the triumph of the white race


https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/race.world1

The rest of the talk is about how this is to be achieved, and then it struck me that while the Jews and Muslims have their social organisations and places of worship as well as their schools to teach their children how to be Jewish and Muslim adults. The fatherless white prole will grow up into the angry white man because of his fornicating slut of an unmarried mother. He will have no safe space other than the pub that he can these days barely afford to visit, and even then he will be forced to endure unmarried mothers bringing their illegitimate children into his nearest branch of Wetherspoons getting sozzled while their mixed race children run riot.

Worst of all, he will probably not be able to find a woman either of his own race or another race to marry him because he is skint, scared and stupid and because even his own government has utterly abandoned him.

These days, most fatherless white proles go to sink schools where they have underage sex, deal drugs and bully each other, sometimes to suicide and homicide.

In the UK grammar schools are stuffed with the white middle class, but mostly the non-white children of ambitious non-white parents.

Basically, privileged white middle class women in positions of influence despise white men, especially if these white men are in the class below them.

Tory MPs think it is the job of Labour MPs to look after the proles, but the only proles that get looked after are the ones who are trade union members whose unions fund the Labour Party.

Jeremy Corbyn the leader of the Labour Party will be too clueless and pussywhipped to speak up for these men.

Millennial Woes did not mention that Keith Joseph who was Jewish and Tory Prime Minister in waiting said some pertinent and eugenic things in his Edgbaston speech in 1974 that "our human stock is threatened". However, he had his career destroyed for daring to criticise unmarried single mothers.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Lord Glasman also Jewish tried to say propose BNP-esque policies as the ideas man for Blue Labour but also had his career destroyed in the process when feminazi Helen Goodman got wind of this.

https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Compare these rather selfless Jewish men to the treacherous Peter Hitchens whose mother was an adulterous suicide who has already declared that he will never criticise the unmarried mother. 

Peter Hitchens won't condemn the low sexual morals of British women because of how his mother died, I have concluded.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1319183/Stopping-new-unmarried-mothers-benefits-reform-make-richer.html

Peter Hitchens on single mothers:
They should not be condemned
Peter Hitchens is of course a Jew because his mother was a Jewess as well as an adulteress suicide.

Millennial Woes associates with Greg Johnson who has openly declared his intention of expelling Jews from America because Jews are a different race from the gentile.

This is of course unarguable since Jews have already been declared a different and distinctive race in law.

https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2009/12/faith-schools-jewish-jfs

The argument that Jews constitute an ethnic group under the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Public Order Act 1986 was an important factor in a trial in Leeds this year, in which two men were convicted of inciting racial hatred against Jews. 
https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/reframing-the-jewish-question/

Greg Johnson:
Some White Nationalists don’t want to hear it. But even so, as I have argued here, they still have to face up to the Jewish question. Because if Jews are nothing more than a distinct people, then ethnonationalists must conclude that Jews belong in their own homeland, not in ours. It is as simple as that.

The sad thing about the alt-right they are not very well-educated and those who are reasonably well-educated who lead them are unwise and dishonourable.

Note how Millennial Woes behaves as if he is a dictator issuing decrees or at any rate a stern headmaster telling what he expects of his pupils.

Disappointingly, he did not mention religion at all, a subject that I was most anxious to discuss with him or any other nationalist. I am not so away with the fairies that I do not know that most nationalists are in fear of Islam and that the last thing they want to do is to be made to embrace Islam, though I know some nationalists who have converted. 

He does say that he will deal with religion in a future talk and I must just be patient as to how he will address the point of Christianity being kaput and how the only logical religion left must be Islam because Judaism is for Jews only, whether we like it or not because it cannot be Buddhism or Hinduism, can it? That really would be too ridiculous for words.

Wednesday, 18 October 2017

What are the limits of Jewish responsibility?






“What are the limits of Jewish Responsibility?”
A week-long conference hosted by Beth Torah
October 22-28
Featuring a kickoff event with Rabbi Sacks



Claire Khaw You owe the gentile the duty God felt Jonah owed the people of Nineveh.

If you live amongst them, you won't want them to be driven crazy by their out of control women and then take their anger out on you, do you?

You know the most virulent anti-Semites even blame you for Christianity (and its failure) and of course their current fear of having Christianity replaced by Islam.

Israel is not big enough to accommodate all of you and most of you I am sure would prefer to stay exactly where you are.

Out of your own self interest you should strive to prevent the descent of the gentile into ever deepening insanity and degeneracy. His current preoccupation with mentally ill adults and children who want to change their sex is a sign of his deepening dementia.

It would help if this was done with a real sense of focus and intent, not merely going through the motions for form's sake saying "We tried telling them, but they wouldn't listen. What can you do? Oy vey!" If you say it too politely, he won't understand. If you say it with just enough clarity and brutality to get the message through, he will get angry. Tough call.


I have tried, but no one listens to me. (It is probably because corrupt Western media have conspired to make a point of ignoring me altogether no matter how newsworthy I am, because I am not really supposed to exist.)

In Britain, Keith Joseph and Maurice Glasman have tried to help and warn the gentile, but had their careers destroyed by gentile women who are feminazis infesting every arm of government and every layer of state.

Rabbi Sacks has said himself that Jews don't listen to each other, especially as their religion does not have the equivalent of a Pope. I have noticed that gentiles never listen to each other either because of their accursed and erroneous doctrine of egalitarianism leading to feminism which also leads to constant buck-passing and avoidance of responsibility.

Happily, Rabbi Sacks has said himself that gentiles do listen to Jews and certainly did in the case of Jonah, and this cannot be denied: the people of Nineveh listened to Jonah, and Christians listened to Christ.

Cometh the hour, cometh the man.

Is Rabbi Sacks the man?




https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/reframing-the-jewish-question/

Greg Johnson:


I do believe that Jews are not just different from whites, but powerful and malevolent enemies who bear significant responsibility for causing white decline and opposing white renewal.


Most of the people who most hate Jews come from the lower strata of society, although of course there are exceptions. There will always be people who prefer to find convenient scapegoats rather than grasp the nettle of feminism or slay sacred cows or propose anything that might be unpopular.

Nationalists are unlikely to tackle feminism on their own because they are plebeian men who want to have sex with fornicatresses and least likely to be able to afford a wife or be found to be marriageable. Even if they knew for a fact that what I have said about feminism to be absolutely true, there will always be a temptation for those who do not have a strict regard for truth to insist that Jews are to blame rather than give up their sexual access to some fornicatress by offending her. Challenging feminism would of course be extremely offensive to most Western women these days who are overwhelmingly feminist. I suspect most Jewesses are also overwhelmingly feminist if not even more so, but they are at least careful about whom they marry if they have observant parents.

It is well known that the lower classes if brought up at all do not have a strict regard for truth. Indeed, it can be said that even those who went to the best schools do not have a strict regard for truth. It is even possible that many Jews do not have a strict regard for truth.


"With privilege comes responsibility, and privileges can be withdrawn," I remember my headmistress Miss Howe saying.


Unskilled white labour know they have been abandoned by the Labour Party. The supposed compassion and empathy of white middle class women do not extend to men of their own class, and even less so to men of a social class lower than theirs.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

How to nudge Jews in the direction of Secular Koranism

Nationalist men will always be keener to blame Jews and Muslims than their own treacherous women in positions of influence who don't care about them

Jews fret over gentiles suffering family breakdown caused by rampant rampaging feminism

Rabbi Sacks challenges Liberal Jews on their atheism

Simon Sheppard answers some daft questions on the British, God, Jews, antisemitism, Christianity, feminism and his childhood

Conservatism comes from theocracy

My Rosh Hashanah message to Jews who believe in patriarchy and see the evil of matriarchy

How Western men are demoralised in the workplace and how Western labour is made uncompetitive

Jews are blamed for everything, including the failure of Christianity

In our matriarchy, the Jew is lower in status to the fornicating slut, because even the privileged Jew dares not criticise her

Blame feminism, not Jews

Who corrupted whose morals?

Wednesday, 30 August 2017

Claire Khaw in conversation with John Collins on 27 August 2017



9:00  Women in the workplace got John Collins sacked from his job.


28:00  John Collins thinks Millennial Woes had a girlfriend who was complaining about him to a male friend of hers who was looking to move in on her.  This man will be her next victim, he thinks.


31:00 Depression and Millennial Woes.


33:00  Women who say "I need a new husband/car/house/holiday etc" and get one but are still miserable when they get it.


43:00 John Collins: "If feminism were given its proper name, feminism is the borderline personality disorder acceptance movement."

49:00 John Collins disputes the claim of Millennial Woes that the academic left are planning the destruction of the West. Greg Johnson prepared to use the death of anyone at a demonstration to further the message of the alt-right.


50:00  "Violence will be seen as the only solution if ....  "


52:00  Millennial Woes not prepared to discuss how civic nationalism can get ethno-nationalists what they want.



53:00 John Collins comments on Millennial Woes' position on National Socialism.


54:00  Pogroms  All the countries who conduct them feel sheepish about them afterwards.


55:00  John Collins: "There is no political will for a white ethno-state."


58:00  THOUGHTCRIME and the Equality Act 2010


59:00  John Collins says he has been demonetised because he is a friend of Matt Forney.

1:00  Jews have been around for longer than the Chinese.

1:05  The failure of Christianity in maintaining morality in the West


1:06  Islam is about making the rules clear.


1:07  Jews and Muslims respect marriage and the family, Muslims in Rochdale.


1:13  Narcissism


1:16  Religion and the narcissist eg LGBTs


1:17  Homosexuality and child abuse


1:21 Nostalgia, the narcissist, Millennial Woes and Manichaeism


1:26  The Cerebral Narcissist


1:28  Sam Vaknin
https://www.youtube.com/user/samvaknin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Vaknin


1:31  Power, authority and Hillary Clinton

1:32  Trump

1:33  Israel


1:35  Communist infiltration, organised criminality, CIA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_vs._Spy

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/perverse-subjection-of-men-to-women-in.html


1:35  Communist infiltration, organised criminality, CIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_vs._Spy

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/perverse-subjection-of-men-to-women-in.html


1:40 According to John Collins, Millennial Woes is simplistic, childlike, dangerous to young people appealing to their sense of victimhood and in and out group preferences. His leadership qualities are also untried. Race war, Rochdale, child abuser who lived across the road from John Collins who operated in the 1980s and went on in the 1970s, dirty mac flashers, Cyril Smith, KGB, CIA, MI5. Muslims gangs simply exploited this state of affairs that had been going on for decades. Gillick Competence.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillick_competence  Under-age sex.

1:51  While John Collins was having his heart attack, suppressed memories from his childhood surfaced. "The things you don't do shape the person you are." 15 and 16 year old girls blackmailing a drug dealer, his niece and her classmates, cat-fishing and blackmailing men who had unknowingly had underage sex with them. Sex with 27 men.

2:00  Millennial Woes plays the victim to elicit sympathy to manipulate you into protecting him and his race - a feminine stratagem. Millennial Woes is more dangerous than Richard Spencer as a recruiter. John Collins says Millennial Woes is like Fagin. Followers of Millennial Woes drawn to the alt-right because they are drawn to father figures and strong men, having been deprived of their fathers by their mothers.


2:05  John Collins: "Millennial Woes is not that self aware. He is being seen as a father figure by a generation of lost boys."


2:08  Greg Johnson says he is hedonist, according to John Collins.

https://www.thecut.com/2017/04/jack-donovan-philosophical-fascists-of-the-gay-alt-right.html

https://altright.com/2017/06/01/greg-johnsons-attacks-and-how-to-deal-with-them/


2:10  Davis Aurini discussed. According to John Collins, he is a poor judge of character, is a co-dependent and has issues with his father.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/livestream-with-claire-khaw-feminism.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/my-disappointing-evening-with-davis.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/a-pagan-odinist-questions-effectiveness.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/would-you-like-me-on-davis-aurini-again.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/sex-and-strategy-with-davis-aurini-and.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/davis-aurini-calls-claire-khaw-white.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/davis-aurini-asks-me-why-i-am-obsessed.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/youtubers-complain-about-claire-khaw.html


2:11  Matt Forney

If you claim Jesus is God, you should be able to entertain the idea of mortal sin and Hell

0:50  Gangsters don't use diplomacy. 1:00  Tarred by the same brush 2:00  Has the government gone mad? 3:00  TLC is a microcosm of Ameri...