The pernicious nonsense that is the liberal concept of HUMAN RIGHTS

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b015cnys


‎"Human Rights", eh? Is there any other kind of right on this earth??  Animal rights?  Vegetable rights?  Mineral rights?

I would have thought that the most FUNDAMENTAL human right would be to have freedom of expression.

But liberals no longer believe in this FUNDAMENTAL LIBERAL PRINCIPLE.

What are fundamental liberal principles?

Bet you don't know, because you are all fucking stupid. So here they are then:

1. The right to property

2. Freedom of expression

3. Freedom of association

4. Freedom of contract

5. Freedom of belief

Because you are all stupid, I bet you haven't noticed that:

Holocaust Denial is THOUGHTCRIME.

Incitement to racial hatred is THOUGHTCRIME.

Incitement to religious hatred is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you think she is the wrong sex is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you don't like homosexuals is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone disabled because you would rather not is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you think he or she is too young or too old for the job is THOUGHTCRIME.

Not hiring someone because you don't like his or her religion is THOUGHTCRIME.

Hating is THOUGHTCRIME, folks. These fucking liberals are presuming to tell us whom we can and cannot HATE.

And you stupid fuckers put up with this sort of shit like the stupid fucking sheeple you are.

And these liberals who started the crap at the European Convention of Human Rights insist on the rightness and necessity of their thoughtcrimes while fining your government for not giving prisoners the right to vote.  http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/feb/04/prisoner-voting-convicts-human-beings

And nobody notices how fucking stupid this is.

By the way, did you know that the Koran states that "There is no compulsion in belief"?

Bet you ignorant idiots didn't know that the Koran is more liberal than liberalism.

2:256  http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/002-qmt.php
10:99  http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/010-qmt.php
18:29  http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/quran/verses/018-qmt.php

The reason why it doesn't seem that way is because most Muslims are too lazy and stupid to read the Koran, and too scared to question and discuss it with their fellow Muslims.

But are Muslims more stupid and lazy than Americans who don't know and don't care that their constitution has been flouted by successive governments?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B003B0W1US/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1

The answer is NO.  Muslims are not more lazy and stupid than Americans who don't know and don't care that the US constitution is being flouted by successive US governments.   In fact, the US constitution is a damn sight shorter than the Koran.

I think being pussywhipped by Slut Single Mums makes you stupid, scared, skint, weak and despised, and white men are undeniably pussywhipped by Slut Single Mums.  The anti-immigration political parties are actually the most pussywhipped because they are so pathetically grateful that any woman should turn up to their meetings that they have decided that they want to court the female vote with a girly heart logo,




forgetting that it was courting the female vote was what brought the nation and Western civilisation to its current degraded and dumbed-down state.

This is what happens when men abdicate power to the weaker sex.

Conclusive sign that Western leaders don't know what they are doing

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-04/23/c_13841994.htm

When France and Britain decided to bomb Libya, did they really not see that a flood of refugees from Africa to Europe would be inevitable, strengthening the support for nationalist and anti-immigrant parties?

If they did not, they must have been warned, one would have thought.

If they had been warned, why did they not listen?

Is it cos they have shit for brains because they are the political establishment in a demented matriarchy and have a compulsion to keep doing mad and silly things?

Bombing Libya is not really a foreign policy objective, it is just a manifestation of a compulsion to intervene, just like one may have a compulsion to masturbate, shop, drink, take drugs or gamble.

I certainly saw it coming and offer my services to this benighted country to be Dictator of Britain so that it may once again have a rational domestic and foreign policy.

Other candidates should also offer themselves too, of course, and we could be elected by SMS and AV.

Depression, dementia, atheism and A NEW NATIONAL RELIGION!

Hark at the journos and politicians prating about dementia, depression and the parlous state of mental health the British are in.

My solution would be to disestablish the Church of England and invite tenders from various religious organisations so that a new religion that is better for the long-term national interest of the British Nation can be established.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I am under the impression that people's mental health tend to improve when they think someone who is Omniscient, Eternal and Omnipotent is their Best Friend.

Perhaps even I could help by developing further the idea of Secular Koranism? It is a synthesis of philosophy and religion combined into a distinct and cohesive ideology. It asserts that the Koran is a good enough guide, even for those who do not believe in God.

The Cult of Reason and Supreme Being ("CORASB")

The practice of submitting to Truth, Reason and Reality (if that is what God is, if God exists) is capable of both being a philosophy and a religion.

To start a Cult of Reason and The Supreme Being that is mutually indivisible is therefore logically possible and politically desirable.

Imagine: a religion and philosophy capable of appealing to both atheists and monotheists ....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Reason
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_the_Supreme_Being

What is civilisation?

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7314/

Civilisation is when the good are strong.

That is the only objective meaning I can distil from this stubbornly nebulous concept of "civilisation".

Everyone, after all, imagines that they are civilised.

The West is no longer strong because it is no longer good. It is no longer good because it has forgotten its traditions of liberty that once made it strong.

For the West has been corrupted by his welfare state, which promotes fecklessness, promiscuity, and tolerance of societally damaging behaviour in the name of indiscriminate compassion and equality.

Bribed by the promise of social security for so many generations, the Westerner and his leaders have forgotten Benjamin Franklin's warning: "Those who prefer safety to liberty deserve neither."

Civilisational "age"

This big state/small state dichotomy has been with us since time immemorial. The Romans had a welfare state.

Maybe it is just a sign of one's civilisational age, in that if you progress as a civilisation you grow from barbarism to conquest, conquest to affluence, affluence to taking up silly soft-headed newfangled ideas such as the welfare state and thence to decline, dementia and extinction.

We are now suffering from Alzheimer's, having forgotten what we were or where we came from, ignorant of our present location, and have now forgotten where the hell we are supposed to be going or why we are going there.