Why ecology is the religion of atheists

What do atheists like about their religion of ecology and environmentalism?

They like Nature, they like animals and they are atheists who believe in sexual liberation.

Sexual liberation means the widespread practice of recreational extramarital non-procreative sex.

Because environmentalists believe that the world would be a better place with fewer humans, it gives its adherents the perfect excuse not to marry and have children. Spouses are annoying, inconvenient and expensive and so are children, especially if you want to educate and bring them up properly.

Because Nature is indeed beautiful, Western environmentalists are predictably moved by its grandeur and beauty, more than they are moved by the almost incomprehensible Doctrine of the Trinity that their ancestors once paid lip service to. Environmentalists have Christian ancestors and therefore the religion they reject is Christianity, whose doctrinal requirement is to believe that Christ is also God Himself and His son, which is patently absurd.

Having rejected Christianity, they are unlikely to go for Judaism or Islam either. Christianity in practice only requires people who call themselves Christians to claim that they believe in the Trinity to be in good standing with their corruptible and corrupt clergy who mostly don't believe in it either, while adherents of Judaism and Islam actually have to do things good Jews and Muslims are supposed to do ie refrain from indulging in extramarital sex and celebrate their traditions over and above guzzling chocolate eggs at Easter and indulging in drunkenness and gluttony at Christmas.

Environmentalists also like animals. Many of them are spinsters with cats who indulged in sexual liberation on the cock carousel until they realised they had ruined themselves for marriage before settling down to a life of pets.

Environmentalism is the product of our Culture of Consumption, or, if you prefer, our Culture of Sex and Shopping. We know this because Environmentalism has no solutions other than recycling. It certainly dares not touch the vexed issue of usury which turbo-charges our consumerism. The worship of Mammon is about creating desire for a consumer good where none previously existed, impelling its victims to lend and borrow irresponsibly to satisfy a desire that will soon be replaced by another desire for another consumer good, reducing us to mere fungible units of consumption, without identity and without principle who become the disposable units of a disposable culture. As well as individuals, governments also lend and borrow irresponsibly and their victims are its citizens, at sea in a swamp of empty consumption, simultaneously indulging in all of the Seven Deadly Sins at an unprecedented rate.

Environmentalism is silent on usury, but Islam, which would ban usury, is not.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285332/Follow-Islamic-way-save-world-Charles-urges-environmentalists.html

The Bible and the Koran condemn profligacy and waste, but what is waste if not throwing away perfectly useful things just because they are no longer new or fashionable, to buy something else we don't need with borrowed money we don't have?

Waste is of course supremely environmentally unfriendly when you think of all the factories producing things nobody really needs belching out pollution caused by its energy-consumption.

Have you noticed that Britain's only Green MP 's constituency is in Brighton, the gay capital of Britain? Gay sex is the cheapest form of sex you can get, cheaper even than hiring a prostitute. Gay sex is the cheapest form of sex because gay couples who have sex with each other are most likely to enjoy the sex act for the sake of the sex act, while heterosexual couplings require seduction, domination, submission or the exchange of money for sexual services. Marriage is the most expensive form of sex,while fornication is the second most expensive.

To perpetuate the matriarchy, feminists have to ensure that most of the sex that takes place in society is extramarital sex, and this is why they get so offended about my proposal to shame sluts, as quran.com/24/2 requires.

To become a patriarchy again, gay sex and fornication have to be criminalised while marriage is reconsecrated and prostitution tolerated once more.

You may have noticed that feminists want to in effect ban prostitution by criminalising the punter for buying sex, which is much more intolerant and restrictive than the Koran. The Koran at least tolerates prostitution provided you do not compel your slave girls.
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=24&verse=33

So there we have it: patriarchy is about keeping the price of sex high which is eugenic and in the long term national interest, while matriarchy is about keeping the price of sex comfortably low for degenerates and atheists who refuse to make the sacrifices required for marriage and family values, who don't care about their children, descendants, society, nation or civilisation after they are dead. The political system that most favours the perpetuation of the matriarchy is of course liberal democracy, because it ensures that government can never think beyond the next election, which is always less than five years ahead of the present. This means they can never think of promoting the long term national interest, which explains why politicians are invariably stupid, corrupt, short-termist, unprincipled, cowardly and damnably irresponsible.

Worse, the Fourth Estate - the media who are supposed to call to account the government as well as analyse and report stories and opinion - have been co-opted into the exercise of defending this political system, probably because they are also mostly sexually corrupt and stuffed with feminists and LGBTs.

You pays your money and you makes your choice: are you a rational and decent person or a hedonistic degenerate bent on filling your boots before you die with no thought for posterity?

If you are the former, you would feel morally obliged to choose a one party theocracy. If you are a degenerate, you would of course be happy with things exactly the way they are. You would not be capable of telling the Noble Lie or wish to perpetuate it.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_lie

Being Green

I found this on Facebook:

"Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment.
The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days."

The young clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations." 

She was right -- our generation didn't have the green thing in its day.

Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were truely recycled.

But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags, that we reused for numerous things, most memorable besides household garbage bags, was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks. This was to ensure that public property, (the books provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribblings. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags.

But too bad we didn't do the green thing back then.

We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.

But she was right. We didn't have the green thing in our day.

Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing.

But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana. In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity.

But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.

But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest burger joint.

But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then?

Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smartass young person."

Another reason to convert to Islam?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285332/Follow-Islamic-way-save-world-Charles-urges-environmentalists.html

Another reason to be Muslim, according to Prince Charles.

Maybe the BNP should promise to disestablish the Church of England so he can convert to Islam?

Henry VIII would have been a happier husband and the English a happier reign if their king had been Muslim.

Islam allows divorce. Orthodox Judaism and Catholicism, hypocritically, does not.

My take on global warming

It doesn't matter if it is natural or synthetic global warming. We shouldn't pay tax on it because what we should do is consume less, stay home, live frugally and avoid going shopping unless absolutely necessary.

But this would be the equivalent of a recession/depression, so the government would rather bail-out banks, make us borrow money we don't have to buy things we don't want, than get off the carousel of consumerism.

While we are doing as they want, they are going to tax us till the pips squeak in the name of the environment and make future generations pay for the folly of the banks and the uselessness of the government in failing to prevent this quite predictable folly.

Just as long as you understand:

IT DOES NOT MATTER IF GLOBAL WARMING IS NATURAL OR MAN-MADE; WE SHOULD NOT BE PAYING TAX ON IT.