Michael Voris tells us what he thinks of the C of E and "the whole stinking rotten filth of Protestantism"

To be fair to Henry VIII, @Michael_Voris, he really felt he must have a male heir. http://t.co/QP11fB7Xcs

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 6, 2015

Is fair of @Michael_Voris 2 blame Edward VI (dead at 15) 4 hving "essentially bulldozed the Church over the cliff "? http://t.co/QP11fB7Xcs

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 6, 2015

Listen to @Michael_Voris call Good Queen Bess "a coy old witch". http://t.co/TLytSquuy6

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 6, 2015

Listen to @Michael_Voris call Henry VIII "a lust-crazed, murderous monarch". http://t.co/TLytSquuy6

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 6, 2015

Michael Voris in London hating Michael Coren and the "whole stinking rotten filth of Protestantism" especially the C of E

Claire Khaw disabled from posting on Facebook for 30 days because Akkas Al Ali reported his own insulting comments to her

One of the Artistic Directors at the publicly-funded ie taxpayer-funded Sandpits Art

I am blocked from posting on Facebook for 30 days for posting:

AK von London:
"oh i've been meaning to delete you for a while
this is, of course, the perfect reason
but it's mainly because i find you boring now
you're insanity used to make me laugh
but now it makes me pity you
and i abhor people who move me to pity"

This was just abuse that Akkas Al-Ali was hurling at me for being rather rude about his plugging of a play that I thought was dreary in the extreme.

AK von London http://www.akkas.co.uk/bio said:

"Amid the boring stuff, like essay writing and reading dense theoretical texts, I get to watch stuff like this play produced by Al-Rowwad in the Aida refugee camp just outside Bethlehem - which makes it all worthwhile. (Arabic with French subtitles.)"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Chm5qEmG_LU  Do have a look, dear reader!  It really is dire.



I said:

Akkas is now reduced to plugging this sort of thing. He is very angry with me for making rude comments about it, but it is just so AWFUL that I fear the Israelis will want to kill the Palestinians with even greater ferocity. I can just imagine the Palestinians saying: "No, please no more of this pro-Palestinian propaganda that fails on so many levels! You are just making things worse for us!"

He said via inbox:

"oh i've been meaning to delete you for a while
this is, of course, the perfect reason
but it's mainly because i find you boring now
you're insanity used to make me laugh
but now it makes me pity you
and i abhor people who move me to pity"

I published this, and it seems Akkas has reported his own comments.


Dave Wells 
What audience was this intended for ? I mean where, what nation ?

Claire Khaw
A Facebook friend who shall remain nameless:

"I used to drama at GCSE we produced more entertaining stuff than that"

Claire Khaw
The cast is meant to be represent the Palestinians.

Claire Khaw
"you're a joke of course
oh poor claire" Akkas rants ...

Claire Khaw
You're really really bored. What do you go and do? Watch an Arabic play with French subtitles!

Claire Khaw
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/theatre-reviews/7325440/The-Promise-at-the-Orange-Tree-Theatre-review.html was truly superb.
"In an age of uninformed hysteria, this even-handed, well-researched look back at history-in-the-making is as welcome as it is quietly fascinating."

Claire Khaw
http://www.thestage.co.uk/reviews/review.php/27293/the-promise
"The title for Ben Brown’s gripping political play draws on the Balfour Declaration of November 1917, when the British government promised Zionists the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jews. But the original promise of “next year in Jerusalem” has an ancient scriptural basis."

Claire Khaw
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/the-promise-orange-tree-theatre-london-1908299.html
"Did the state of Israel come into being because of the British prime minister's fury at his girlfriend's marrying an anti-Zionist?"

Claire Khaw
Akkas has unfriended me.

Claire Khaw 
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Promise-Ben-Brown/dp/0571268870 [the play]

Claire Khaw

Akkas:

"ha ha ha ha ha ha
that really did make me laugh out loud
the problem with you, of course, is that you're not even a has-been because you never were anything to begin with. this realisation gnaws at you constantly and you hate it being pointed out. so you fixate on silly little causes like jimmy saville because it gives you something to do between breakfast and supper.
i think the timeframe we gave for you achieving anything with your miserable life (back in may 2012) was "this time next year". you have three months to fail even more."

Claire Khaw
Save the Palestinians from Akkas!

Leon Georgiou 
I do enjoy Akkas's rants against you though.

Claire Khaw 
So do I!

Leon Georgiou 
He appears to be very politically confused though. At times a conservative Muslim, at others a radical leftist student.

Claire Khaw 
I think it depends on his time of the month.

Claire Khaw 
Yes, there are a few people I know whose moods seem to be affected by the waxing and waning of the moon ...

________________________________________________________

This is not just a thumbs down to Akkas and the indescribably tedious plays he seems to be "curating" as well as  his incorrigible bitchiness, but a thumbs up to The Promise by Ben Brown performed at the Orange Tree Theatre in Richmond, which should have had a long run at the National if there is any justice in the world.

The outfit he is attached to - Sandpit Arts - is of course supported by public funding by the Arts Council of England.

I never got round to answering Dave Wells' question as to whom the intended audience of such a play would be for.  I cannot imagine any ordinary person - Muslim or not - would want to pay good money to see this.  If I were Palestinian I would be acutely embarrassed.  I think it is not for the benefit of any audience at all, but for the benefit of the performers, directors and  pet Muslims of the government of whom Akkas is one.

Such a shame really. I did go to one of his plays and it was really not bad at all.   It was even reviewed at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/tryst-with-destiny-by-akkas-al-ali.html

I even did the research and gave him the plot summary of a play that he could write to make his name, but he  rejected it out of hand because it was not his own idea.

Pride is a deadly sin, I cannot help but think.

It was basically this: Henry VIII, instead of begging the Pope to grant him a divorce, converts to Islam and simply takes another wife, Ann, and then another, Jane who eventually gives him a son.  Tudor England is peaceful, and no wife of Henry's gets her head chopped off.

Would more of his wives have kept their heads if Henry VIII had converted to Islam when the Pope wouldn't grant him a divorce?  He could have kept Catherine of Arragon and taken as many as four wives in order to sire a son, or he could have divorced them, instead of beheading them so he would be free to marry another.

Why the BNP will *never* challenge feminism and why British nationalism is dead in the water

Nationalist UK ‏@Nationalist_UK
.@1party4all Nobody - apart from Griffin and family - will ever lead the BNP again. Sooner people accept this, they can move on. #EDL
11:11 AM - 7 Oct 12 · Details

Claire Khaw
‏@1party4all
@Nationalist_UK I had a chat with Jim Dowson who told me what #feminists Nick Griffin's daughters are.
11:19 AM - 7 Oct 12 · 

Nationalist UK ‏@Nationalist_UK 

@1party4all Wouldn't surprise me if one of Griffo's daughters takes over and he sits in the background as life president.

11:24 AM - 7 Oct 12 · Details

Nationalist UK
‏@Nationalist_UK
@1party4all No, LOL. But over the last few years they've taken party administration in-house, literally. He'll coach Jenny maybe?
11:27 AM - 7 Oct 12 · 

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
@Nationalist_UK Are Nick Griffin's 4 children all daughters? I actually met Jennifer on the day of this interview: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2004/may/16/uk.race …

Jennifer's journey to the front of the BNP
She is 17, outspoken and loves pop music. Jennifer Griffin, daughter of the British National Party leader, is being presented as the new face of the right. She talks to Amelia Hill.
11:30 AM - 7 Oct 12 · Details

Claire Khaw ‏@1party4all
@Nationalist_UK It is weird how parties become dynastic before they are even fit for purpose.

11:36 AM - 7 Oct 12 ·

At least Henry VIII tried the best he could to avoid having a female successor.  Elizabeth I reigned long and well because she was unusually wise and had good advisers.  The reign of Blood Mary was not a happy time for the English, and there must have been a reason why Henry was terrified of being the one who handed his kingdom to be misruled by a woman.   Is Jennifer Griffin showing any political promise?  It would appear that she subscribes to all the usual feminist pieties a woman these days would.

All I have heard about her political activities was that she failed to attend a Belfast tribunal and gave some weird excuse.  

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/nov/01/bnp-northern-ireland-tribunal-blackmail-claim

Hardly a sign of promise then.  

Clearly, if all Nick Griffin is going to do is hand it to one of his female offspring then dumb unquestioning nationalists are just paying a family firm in the business of selling hope to dumb gullible uneducated losers, who are happy to continue doing this however inept the leadership.  

If you are going to have a feminist leading nationalist, then you might as well a racial foreigner like me leading nationalism.

Has anyone heard Jennifer's speeches?   Does anyone know what she thinks about anything at all?  Jim Dowson said she is a fanatical feminist, and we all know the kind of shit feminists believe in, don't we?

Feminists believe in condoning if not actually rewarding female promiscuity.

Feminism is the ridiculous notion that it is both moral and sustainable to allow women to do men's jobs badly while neglecting their own.

Looks like British nationalism is doomed then.

Whatever Thatcher was she was not a fucking feminist.  

The mystery of the Trinity cannot be solved without ceasing to be a Christian and the time has come to disestablish the Church of England

According to Christians, Christ was more than a prophet of God, he was God Himself.

So, God seduced Mary (in the way that Zeus had a habit of doing to mortal women listed at http://devdutt.com/the-infidelities-of-zeus/), gave birth to Himself, and then sacrificed Himself to save us from our sins.

The Holy Spirit is just the agency of God (and Christ) through which miracles are accomplished, and therefore all three are one.   How can this be, you ask?  The cleverer Christian clergy would invite you to imagine a pyramid with three facets ...

The Inquisition was all about forcing people to say they believe in this SHIT.

These days, ignorant Christians don't even know they are supposed to believe in this SHIT.

The truth is that the Pope and the Archibishop of Cant doesn't either, nor does your vicar or "vicaress", who will be instantly uncomfortable the moment you ask him or her about the Trinity.

The Church will be happy if it manages to get an ignorant congregation to uncomprehendingly recite the Nicene creed.

Muslims and Jews of course deny the Trinity because they see through the SHIT that it all is, and that is why Christians hate and fear them with such visceral virulence.  Occasionally, the hatred and fear of Christians of those who do not share their Trinitarian beliefs is manifested in great events of bloodletting and persecution, eg the Crusades and the Inquisition, with a few pogroms here and there over the centuries, the most recent of which was Hitler's Madagascar Plan.

Christianity as a religion should be dumped precisely because it is both TOTALITARIAN and DIVISIVE. Once it got over being totalitarian and divisive and started being ECUMENICAL and INCLUSIVE it proved to be UTTERLY INEFFECTUAL

Charles the future king would go along with this from the sound of things.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285332/Follow-Islamic-way-save-world-Charles-urges-environmentalists.html

If Charles had been Muslim he wouldn't have had such a hard time over Diana and Camilla, nor would Edward have suffered the loss of his throne for his love for Mrs Simpson, who might have been an OK Queen, who knows.

Actually, if Henry Tudor had been Muslim, there would have been none of the problems he had over defying Rome about finding a wife to bear him a son, the fallout of which has  resulted in centuries of religious persecution by Christians of other Christians.

And that is why I say it is time to disestablish the Church of England (which is these days full of Socialists, Commies, Liberals, Feminists and subversives like the Archbishop of Cant who have made it unfit for the purpose of instilling in the British respect for the institutions of Family and Marriage).  British Muslims in particular should not be afraid to say this.

I keep thinking of all the blood that might not have been shed if Henry VIII had converted to Islam and practised polygamy to have his son ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Cranmer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty-Nine_Articles

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Common_Prayer

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/03/think-and-grow-rich-author-napoleon.html

Religious Intolerance in England after the Break from Rome

Thanks be to the Pope who made me take an interest in these things while he was here!

The Toleration and Test Acts is an affront to all civilised values.  No wonder the Pilgrim Fathers fucked off to America.  

After Henry VIII's break from Rome and there was established the Church of England AKA a Creature of the State, there occurred schism within schism.  Within the Anglican Church, those who dissented from it were in turn discriminated against and persecuted.

Those who did not agree to the 39 Articles were treated as odd and inferior, and deprived of their entitlement to take certain learned and important positions in education and government.  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty-Nine_Articles

If Henry had not broken from Rome, there would not have been such religious intolerance and mutual suspicion, and not quite so many people would have died over whether the Bible was translated into English, which prayer book was used, how much of it was used, and whether people had to be forced into using a particular prayer book and which bits of it etc etc.

If Henry had been Muslim, he would not have needed to ask the Pope's permission to take another wife.  There would have been no problem at all and two of his six wives would have died with their heads on their shoulders. 

The ordinary English folk would have been less prone to being burnt as a heretic or as a Catholic or discriminated against as a Dissenter.

BNP men fretting about the declining numbers and deteriorating quality of the white race would, if Muslim, rest easy in the comforting thought that their Islamic ability to take four wives and sire children with them will quickly replace the birth rate of legitimate white babies with two married parents whose numbers have been so hideously ravaged by extremist feminism.

Indeed, there would have been no extremist feminism at all to contend with.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Toleration_1689
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/39_Articles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1698

Another reason to convert to Islam?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1285332/Follow-Islamic-way-save-world-Charles-urges-environmentalists.html

Another reason to be Muslim, according to Prince Charles.

Maybe the BNP should promise to disestablish the Church of England so he can convert to Islam?

Henry VIII would have been a happier husband and the English a happier reign if their king had been Muslim.

Islam allows divorce. Orthodox Judaism and Catholicism, hypocritically, does not.

Replacing the Archbishop of Canterbury with an Arch-Philosopher?

To disestablish the Church would mean that this country no longer has a state religion. At the moment the state religion is the Church of England which, as we all know, was established by Henry VIII to remove England from Papal control and influence.

By doing so, he intended that no monarch who is a Catholic would ever legitimately reign over England.

What of the reign of Bloody Mary? The only explanation is that Henry's last will and testament, which was made on the basis of blood relationship, gender and seniority of his various children by his various wives, omitted to take into account the fact that his eldest daughter, born of Catherine of Aragon, Catholic through and through, would become Queen when his sickly son Edward died young.

No doubt the one who drafted Henry's will would have lost his head had Henry been alive to accuse and find him guilty of professional negligence. After Mary died the succession passed to Elizabeth. If she had any inclination towards Catholicism, she in her wisdom knew it would no longer be politic to be open about them after her sister's Catholic reign had so traumatised the country.

If you disestablish the Church, then it means that those who become monarchs can be free to embrace any religion they please WITHOUT making it the state religion. In my opinion it would be a good thing, precisely because you never know which religion a monarch might embrace and give the British periodic opportunities to discuss the relative merits of different religions. Catholicism? Islam? Mormonism? Buddhism? Who knows? But it would be a private matter and vary from monarch to monarch.

If Prime Ministers who wield real power are allowed to have freedom of faith, then I see no reason why a constitutional monarch with no political power should not be allowed to do so.

Because of this, the objections raised against a Catholic succession no longer apply.

Since it is Prime Ministers who hold power, I would be more in favour of an Arch-Philosopher (who should be preferably an atheist in order that they have the requisite intellectual flexibility and can be more easily seen as non-partisan) to serve as the Conscience of the Prime Minister. As a species, it is in fact Prime Ministers who are most in need of an Official Conscience of flesh and blood that is rooted in philosophy rather than a child-like belief in an invisible magic friend.

It has been pointed out by the Buddha that belief in God is but another form of attachment, which, as all Buddhists know, is the root of all suffering. The goal of being a Buddhist is to achieve enlightenment. Enlightenment, as we all know, equips those who have it with an indifference to suffering and death without the need to believe in the existence of God.

As a nod to Plato's recommendation that society should be ruled by Philosopher Kings, an Arch-Philosopher would be just the thing to replace the ineffectual and redundant position that is currently the Archbishop's. After all, it is not the constitutional monarch that is in need of a spiritual adviser, but the Prime Minister who is in need of a moral guide and a philosophical adviser!