The link between feminism, mental illness, rising crime, immigration and suicide

www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/mind/norman-lamb-my-sons-mental-health-problems-made-me-determined-to/

@normanlamb May I know if your late sister Catherine was an unmarried single mother?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018 

I wonder if Norman Lamb's late sister Catherine who committed suicide was an unmarried single mother. Lamb is a mental health activist and was a solicitor, but a liberal. Being a liberal, he would want to deny that feminism and sexual liberation causes mental illness.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018

If @normanlamb is such a committed mental health activist, he should be prepared to participate in a debate on whether feminism causes mental illness and suicide in both men and women. It should be a doddle for him since he used to be a solicitor. https://t.co/fJCPOJXjiO

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018

My position is that feminism causes social problems as well as mental illness, immigration, the emasculation of men and the promiscuity of women, causing them to commit suicide. It also causes bad parenting, suicidal offspring and national degeneracy. What say you, @normanlamb? https://t.co/m155XtDWIO

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018

I think a debate between former solicitor @normanlamb and me on whether feminism causes mental illness would attract global interest and engagement. If we could get people to pay to witness it live, I am prepared to donate the proceeds to a mental health charity of his choice. https://t.co/CGpyC2eop7

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018

@bbhippopotamus @MarriageF @anti_fembot @Femail @GenZMGTOW @MGTOWisFREEDOM @SandmanMGTOW @rabbisacks @RabbiZvi @BBCWomansHour @CF_Farrow @PrisonPlanet @PhilipDaviesUK @zarafaris @Contentions @AbdullaAndalusi @yvonneridley @harrybenson6 @rooshv @PressTV @RTUKnews @SophieRunning https://t.co/vW2WsKSC78

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018

@RT_com @RT_America @RT_sputnik @Gayane_RT @WorldsApart_RT @PLCROSSTALK @davidkurten @DVATW @TeleWonderWomen @MartinDaubney @MartinBashir @stillgray @ianrmillard @IanDunt @ianbirrell @RabbiYMizrachi @WhereTheFather @FrancisWheen @JonHolb @Digbylj @WestmonsterUK @tian @whjm https://t.co/vW2WsKSC78

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) February 1, 2018

I wonder if RT will give me a platform to debate feminism if the liberal media of the West won't.  Perhaps Fox News might do this. The bad news is that the Editor in Chief of RT is female. Will the Russians be prepared to let me discuss feminism on RT or are they also just as cucked really? I had in mind being interviewed by Sophie Shevardnadze or Oksana Boyko.

Are the people suffering from mental illness the victims of the bad parenting of an unmarried single mother?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

Would you happen to know if Norman Lamb's late sister Catherine was an unmarried mother? She had more than one offspring, apparently. Were they by the same father?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

That Norman Lamb's late sister who committed suicide was an unmarried mother is directly relevant to the my claim that feminism causes mental illness, bad parenting, immigration, widespread bastardy and the decline of your nation and civilisation.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

Are you saying asking a liberal politician a question is defamatory? I am not the one saying all women are immoral, but making the point that unchaste women are immoral. Is this now no longer allowed?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

Do you think there is any danger of Norman Lamb suing me for defaming his late sister just for asking the question about whether she was an unmarried mother?

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

I only wish to make the point that liberalism in the 21st century is nothing more than sexual liberation from the rules of traditional marriage designed to destroy patriarchy and the possibility of maintaining civilised life and social stability in your nation.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

Being legally trained, I am sure Normal Lamb as a liberal and feminist would be delighted that I am offering him an opportunity to argue in favour of matriarchy and sexual liberation being sustainable, rational and moral. I propose to argue the opposite of course.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

Norman Lamb will have the might of the liberal establishment at his disposal. I like to think he will not be declining this opportunity of a lifetime in debating little old me, all on my own and quite isolated. It could even be done in the @HouseofCommons and televised worldwide.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 1 February 2018

Immigration is caused by feminism

Immigration is caused by feminism causing women to have fewer babies and become working mothers. Normalising working mothers leads to normalising divorced mothers, and normalising divorced mothers leads to normalising never married mothers who are known for their bad parenting skills. Schools attended by these badly-parented children inevitably have to lower standards with the result that school-leavers are not fit to be employed. This makes local labour unattractive compared to foreign labour.

Christian Guy (silly name silly man?) of the Christian Institute says don't stigmatise or criticse sluts

http://www.christian.org.uk/news/warning-as-1-million-kids-grow-up-without-a-father/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+christianinstitute+%28The+Christian+Institute%29&utm_content=FaceBook

“Family breakdown is an urgent public health issue. Backing commitment and setting a goal of reducing instability does not equate to criticising or stigmatising lone parents or those involved.”

Why not criticise or stigmatise sluts?

Time to stop beating about the bush.

Time to call a spade a spade and a slut a slut.

Time to tell feminism to fuck off.
   

Rational Nationalism

More in sorrow than in anger, I must recognise that the BNP are not yet ready for me.  This has been a constant refrain over the years, I will admit.


They are content to plod along, being happy to do a little better than they did before and trim their sails to the foul winds of  Political Correctness, while I am not.

004.104 YUSUFALI: And slacken not in following up the enemy: If ye are suffering hardships, they are suffering similar hardships; but ye have Hope from Allah, while they have none. And Allah is full of knowledge and wisdom. 

PICKTHAL: Relent not in pursuit of the enemy. If ye are suffering, lo! they suffer even as ye suffer and ye hope from Allah that for which they cannot hope. Allah is ever Knower, Wise. 

SHAKIR: And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain, and you hope from Allah what they do not hope; and Allah is Knowing, Wise.

The white working classes are after all riddled with illegitimacy, single parenthood, welfare dependency, ignorance and chauvinistic arrogance.  They dare not let go of their core supporters for fear of having no supporters at all.  How well I remember BNP organisers complaining about the white trash amongst their number and then retract their complaints about the people of their own race, ashamed and confused.   


How frightened they are of discussing anything, just like the LibLabCon for fear of upsetting anyone else and having even more disagreements than they already do.


The kind of party I envisage would allow members access to justice that even the Cabinet Ministers in government would envy.  Currently, any Cabinet Member can be instantly demoted or sacked without any remedy by the Prime Minister, after a "gaffe" when the minister in question accidentally tells the truth..  


It is any surprise that the quality of British politicians is now so egregiously cowardly?


The kind of party I envisage would have the fun of Old Labour when members actually did debate and vote on policy.  


Those who like the sound of this should get in touch with me on Facebook or register at http://www.1party4all.co.uk


http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=107 is its proposed constitution and comments, criticisms and queries are invited.


Think of it is as the best of BNP policies without the worst of its members, with a constitution that will be envied by the other parties.


It is my  hope that I will receive sufficient interest to consider taking this forward.  It is of course open to all who are British citizens regardless of race and religion, and genuinely inclusive as long as you share the goal of returning this country to rationally small government with low taxes, and a free and law-abiding populace in which the institutions of marriage and family are reconsecrated after so many decades of desecration by the feminists and liberals.


Have I just described Conservative principles with an emphasis on social justice, education and a genuine  meritocracy?


You may think that, but I couldn't possibly say.

Nationalism should promote Family Values supported by Marriage and challenge Feminism

How very odd that the white nationalists I have been in communication with do not even grasp the connection between race and nation and the desecration of the institutions of marriage and family by decades of feminism. 

It is perfectly obvious to me that widespread fatherlessness means more fatherlessness and more single motherhood, but not to them.  Without two parents, no culture worth speaking of will be passed on to the next generation, and  fatherlessness and single motherhood will continue to spread like a cancer.

You will find that if you search "family" at http://communications.bnp.org.uk/ge2010manifesto.pdf you will find no reference to family values at all. 

Asians, with their abhorrent practice of honour killing at least see to it that the children they have brought up do not take up with members of the opposite sex that they disapprove of lightly and wantonly. 

They, with their family networks, thrive and easily overtake the indigenous in wealth, education and status while the indigenous fuck themselves silly, drink themselves silly and drug themselves silly and produce the next generation who will do more of the same. 

In a more rational age, white parents would disown and disinherit children of theirs who do things they feel have betrayed their values or disgraced the family, but no longer.

To make the heretical suggestion that white parents take responsibility for the quality of their offspring will make them quail and quake and shudder and shake. 

Instead they compete with each other to be more pathetic, disabled, illegitimate, illiterate, innumerate and helpless to gain the most state benefits, and this with the connivance of the BNP, who are supposed to represent the interests of the white race. 

If the BNP did not prevent me from being their 2012 London mayoral candidate for reasons of race then they prevented me from doing so because they were frightened of alienating the female vote, just like the LibLabCon, because what I said about what I would do with my severely disabled baby offended a BNP mother who is an unwed single mother with disabled offspring herself.

The reason why the white man is in his current degraded state is because of decades of chasing the female vote.  That is why Britain is now so irrational, hysterical, promiscuous, vindictive, hypocritical and cowardly.  But the BNP want more of the same in their great nation, apparently, just without non-white people in it. 

Let us see how far they will get as they will the end but not the means, a female vice.

Wishing to wound but being afraid to strike is yet another. 

Burying one's head in the sand is a dangerous thing though.  When one thinks of someone with their head in the ground and his bottom in the air, certain undignified images and possibilities come to mind. 

But who am I to even attempt to overturn such a long and ignoble British tradition of hypocrisy and cowardice - I , a mere female and a foreigner?

I am no one at all.

Each new generation might as well be a different race ...

Passengers in a railway carriage, 1950. These people are in a party of workers from a boot factory in Leicester going to London for a day trip. It was common for employers to put on trips for their workers, and special trains were often put on for such excursions.

... if the current generation does not bother transmitting its values and customs.

If only I could convince my BNP buddies that the problem is not really about race, but a failure of transmission.

Even families with two married biological parents often fail in transmitting the values of their generation to their children.

Think how much worse would the result be from single parent families.

That is why Western civilisation is fucked by feminism AKA matriarchy AKA a gradual then escalating descent into barbarism and decline.

Will the current generation even succeed in transmitting their empty values of sex and shopping, whingeing and binge-drinking to the next?  They won't even be able to do that if they spend their children's inheritance, will they?

http://www.toytowngermany.com/lofi/index.php/t41522.html for more CHAV and pikey photos - to picture how other nations picture the British now. 

The ever-lowering standards of the Church because it refuses to deal with female promiscuity or question feminism

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/23/church-of-england-baptisms-weddings


http://www.platitudes.org.uk/platblog/index.php Rhidian Brook, writer, celebrity and Christian Friday, July 24, 2009, 08:30 AM
Rating 4 out of 5 (Highly platitudinous)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/programmes/thought/documents/t20090724.shtml

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1198962/Yes-family-breakdown-IS-broken-Britain-Top-judge-says-national-tragedy-attacks-BBC-suppressing-debate.html

"44% of children are born to unmarried mothers"

The number 4 is considered unlucky by the Chinese because it sounds like death. Two 4s therefore would be considered doubly unlucky. It would appear that we are an unlucky nation in a doomed civilisation.

Do you hear anything being proposed by the government about discouraging women from becoming unmarried mothers? Well, do you?

Of course not, because they have shit for brains.

Do you hear anything from the Church about condemning family breakdown and female promiscuity? Other than to be "more relevant to modern life" and lowering their standards just to get more bums on seats?

Let the Church sink to the level of the degraded average Briton, it says.

No, because they have shit for brains too. What happens to civilisations whose people don't do anything about their shit-for-brains politicians?

They all die a natural death of course.

Our alotted time-span is now coming to an end.

028.058
YUSUFALI: And how many populations We destroyed, which exulted in their life (of ease and plenty)! now those habitations of theirs, after them, are deserted,- All but a (miserable) few! and We are their heirs!
PICKTHAL:
And how many a community have We destroyed that was thankless for its means of livelihood! And yonder are their dwellings, which have not been inhabited after them save a little. And We, even We, were the inheritors.
SHAKIR: And how many a town have We destroyed which exulted in its means of subsistence, so these are their abodes, they have not been dwelt in after them except a little, and We are the inheritors,

028.059
YUSUFALI: Nor was thy Lord the one to destroy a population until He had sent to its centre a messenger, rehearsing to them Our Signs; nor are We going to destroy a population except when its members practise iniquity.
PICKTHAL: And never did thy Lord destroy the townships, till He had raised up in their mother(-town) a messenger reciting unto them Our revelations. And never did We destroy the townships unless the folk thereof were evil-doers.
SHAKIR: And your Lord never destroyed the towns until He raised in their metropolis a messenger, reciting to them Our communications, and We never destroyed the towns except when their people were
unjust.

Is sex political? Is feminism political? Is the Pope Catholic? Do bears poo in woods?

http://www.family-men.com/Summary%20of%20Divorce%20Law%20since%201970.htm

Read this, then feel your wallet and look fearfully at your wife ....