Translate

Showing posts with label Jonathan Bowden. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jonathan Bowden. Show all posts

Sunday, 10 March 2019

A conversation with Hare Krishna man who supports UKIP


20:00  BNP faces court case over membership rules  https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/aug/24/bnp-court-case-membership-discrimination

Profile: London mayoral candidate Carlos Cortiglia
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17629854

Nick Griffin expelled by BNP
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29453341
23:00  Jonathan Bowden  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2012/04/late-jonathan-bowden.html

27:00  The Eleventh Hour by John Tyndall  http://www.spearhead.co.uk/other.html

28:00  Sleeping With the Far Right review – could you move in with a man too racist for Ukip?
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/feb/21/sleeping-with-the-far-right-review-could-you-move-in-with-a-man-too-racist-for-ukip

43:00  Intellectual property

49:00  White Nationalist radicalised by Angela Merkel

50:00  Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3526810/

54:00  Hare Krishna and Reincarnation

1:09:00  Ukip proposes creation of Muslim-only prisons in interim manifesto
'This is the first step to Muslim concentration camps,' says anti-extremism campaigner. 'What next, deportation of all Muslims from these ‘Muslim only jails'? '
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-party-conference-muslim-prisons-islam-farage-gerard-batten-a8549426.html

1:08:00  Jews

1:10:00  My Master Plan, 4chan,

1:12:00  Propertarianism





Saturday, 22 August 2015

The late Jonathan Bowden on biology, feminism and traditional societies




From 24:59:

In what sense do you understand men and women to be different and in what way should societal and other institutions reflect those differences?

JB:

"I think life determines the difference. I think it is biological. Some women have different brains. They socialise and interact with each other in completely different ways. Deep down almost everyone understands this. There is always a problem with the proportion of women who are completely capable of doing quite advanced male careers. Do you rip up what society always was to facilitate this active, gifted and militant minority to get their own way? The West is a society that allows it to do that. It has made a lot of other people rather unhappy - both male and female. 70% of women just want a home-based option: a man and children, despite all the ideology that goes around, but there is still 30% that would want something different. The Western tradition is slightly different to the Asiatic, the Negroid, the Arab, the Eurasian and others. Women have always had more of a stake publicly in Western societies. The Germanic tribes the women often fought behind the men. The men went first. I am opposed to feminism but at the same time there are gifted women who can perform certain public roles, but as long as you ideologise on what deep down most men and women want, the truth is natural biology will take care of these things. You have to apply immense pressure on a society to get it to act in a counter-propositional and non-biological way. You have to engage in intense propagandistic efforts through the media to try and reverse gender roles and force inverted stereotypes on people. If you take all that off and allow the natural quote unquote political incorrectness of gender roles to proliferate you will find that you will have the odd MI5 Chief who is a woman and the odd judge who is a woman but broadly speaking you will have a traditional society where the roles are quite clearly male and female and deep down no woman respects a man who doesn't think that although they don't like him saying this."

Monday, 26 January 2015

Claire Khaw's ideas on feminism in harmony with the late Jonathan Bowden's


From the 48th minute:

Feminism hasn't changed women at all because they retain their traditional roles with the option of their modern role.

Jonathan Bowden:

"I think men have been the real recipients of feminist ideology. It is men who have been transformed by it, albeit reluctantly transformed because they feel there is no option but to accept a certain dose of it in order to have some successful private life."

In other words, men only pretend to accept feminism because it gets them pussy.

http://cdn.counter-currents.com/radio/JonathanBowdenFeminismLondonForum24thSept2011.mp3

From the 21st minute:

"No politician can now criticise the single parent family because so many people are now involved in them and they are so much part of the constituent electorate to which one has to appeal. Marriage itself has been relativised almost to a point of semi-invisibility within the culture although there are still quite strong ideological pressures to keep it as a gold standard or as an ideal ... "

Thursday, 9 October 2014

Graduality means being gradually turned into a society of sluts, bastards and single mothers without anything effective being done by the Church


Jonathan Bowden:

"I believe that people can be as Christian as they want culturally, but they should be ethically pagan. They should look at the Greco-Roman and Nordic world. They should learn more about their history, culture, and civilization. They should be less dualist. They should adopt stronger and more articulate formulations that will mentally toughen them up a little bit. All of these things are available. The philosophers who advocate many of these things, Schopenhauer (a little bit), Kierkegaard (yes and no), Nietzsche (very much), they’re all in Waterstones. They’re not secret. They’re not banned. They’re not hidden away. If you want it you can go and find it, but it’s got to exist in you first."

It's not going to happen, is it? Secular Koranism http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html is more likely to happen than this, and you know it.

We know what the problem is: the desecration of the institution of marriage which cannot be fixed by the rotten corpse of Catholic Church, because the majority of the West are sluts, feminists, atheists, bastards, SSMs http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/3-degrees-of-culpability-in-single.html and MCSFs http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html, and they will not be listening to a bunch of paedo priests who claim to believe in a deity whose existence they have mocked ever since they could remember.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2785792/Casual-sex-youth-restricts-chance-happy-marriage-later-life-says-Britain-s-senior-Catholic.html

https://twitter.com/search?src=typd&q=%23Synod14 will give you an idea of the platitudes Catholics are mouthing.

Graduality is the latest buzzword.

http://ncronline.org/news/vatican/among-first-synod-discussions-changing-harsh-language-trying-graduality

Nichols said one recurring theme so far is the theological notion of "graduality," meaning that Catholics may sometimes grow toward adherence or understanding of church teaching throughout their lives.

"It's a law of pastoral moral theology which permits and encourages people, all of us, to take one step at a time in our search for holiness in our lives," Nichols said.

"There is a pathway by which we all walk, and I think some of the foundations for the development of that notion have been mentioned already in the first days" of the synod, he said.


What does it all mean?

It is just the Church getting read to fudge the issue, saying "Let us agree to disagree", "Each to his or her own", "We mustn't say anything about morality lest we be accused of being paedo priests, and generally shutting up about morality basically, as long we keep our jobs and get bums on pews, which is how the Anglican Church also operates."

Nature abhors a vacuum, and Christianity is now a moral vacuum. Into this vacuum will move Islam. 

Friday, 11 October 2013

On British Nationalists who claim they are pagan


I ask this question because the late Jonathan Bowden once claimed he was a pagan in this video.

Are our gods part of our national identity?

Does Jonathan Bowden say he is a pagan not because he really is a pagan but because he feels that to say so makes him more of a nationalist?

Worshiping pagan gods has the effect of excluding the foreigner. I find it difficult to imagine that Bowden really did worship Celtic gods.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Celtic_deities

I hope that nationalists will forgive me for saying so, but I am almost certain that Bowden's professed paganism was really a nationalist affectation.

It is the last refuge of the beleaguered nationalist, I suppose. The foreigner is now here. Many of them speak better English than the indigenous British, and they also have more money and their women are not known to be mostly uniformly promiscuous. The British nationalist has nothing left but the ancient gods of his forefathers. By claiming to worship them and calling himself an Odinist, he can in this way exclude the foreigner.

After all, the gods of Ancient Britons are his alone. They are his alone because no one wants them, and so he feels safe in claiming these as his, knowing that he will enjoy some security of possession.

A good leader on the other hand would choose the best religion for his people.

The best religion for maintaining morality and thus obtain social cohesion is Islam, in my opinion, but it is the religion of the people they consider backward and barbaric, so that is out of their question.

Imagine a football team competing against another. One football team has team members who enjoy wine, women and song to the exclusion of everything else, and the other trains hard. Because the former hates the latter with such fervent intensity, it refuses to do what the latter does, ie train hard. This is why they keep losing to the other team, and will continue to do so until they drink themselves to death or die of some fatal STD.

In this video, Bowden pronounces that Islam is "very right wing". It is "right-wing" in the sense that it is socially conservative, and being a social conservative is no different to being a fascist or a Nazi these days, as we all know.

Verily, God will not change the lot of those who will not change what is in their hearts. https://quran.com/13/11

If they knew any Classical history, they would have noticed that the Romans adopted the Greek pantheon lock stock and barrel, and renamed the Greek gods in Latin. That was enough to effect the acquisition.

Sadly, however, the typical British nationalist has no interest in religion, philosophy or ideas. He knows he hates his government who let in the immigrants whom he also loathes, and that is the extent of his thought processes.

Nationalists are not interested in listening to new ideas or discussing them, nor in pursuing the logic of any conclusion, if it means attracting any sort of opprobrium from fellow nationalists. They know, of course, how nasty, vicious and malicious they can be to each other.

When they are displeased with each other, they will be accused of being a nonce or a Red, excluded from meetings or expelled from their party, and that will be the end of their political ambitions.

What they like doing is campaigning incompetently and losing elections, holding little meetings that discuss but do not decide, running their parties in an amateurish and unprofessional way and discussing their conspiracy theories.

Like women, all they want is a good whinge. They do not trust themselves to rigorously implement any solution with consistency or competence, you see.

When women whinge at you about their trials and tribulations, they only want a listening ear and a sympathetic demeanor. If you dare to suggest a practical solution they will be offended and angry at your presumption and make a point of punishing you for it.

Nationalists are really no more than white niggers, as a white and nationalist female Facebook friend pointed out to me today.


Sophia Stewart
Sophia Stewart11 October 14:51
This is why Nationalists will never get anywhere. A bunch of useless whining white niggers.

Monday, 21 May 2012

WHY BRITISH NATIONALISM IS COLLAPSING AND THE UNITY OPTIONS ON OFFER by David Jones



Honoured Guest Blogger David Jones  (Over the Farm Gate)


I think, by now, even the most ardent sticks in the mud supporting Nick Griffin can, seeing the dismal election results, no longer all is fine and dandy in UK Nationalism.

The poor showing by the BNP in comparison to both other parties and their previous vote cannot be glossed over with sugar-coated begging letters from Welshpool. Confidence in Nationalist Politics is at an all time low. I know that because even I've been feeling the biting pinch upon the morale of all those that call ourselves English/ British Nationalists.

Despite a rash of "Unity Meetings" around the land, I fear that the agenda/ s at play are not unity but self/ brand interest.

There are essentially two currents flowing in that circuit.

The first is a push to promote the National Front, the main asset there being Richard Edmonds. This is not a genuine unity effort in my opinion, no disrespect to the ex-BNP officials now working hard within the NF, but a recruitment drive. When I was an NF member in late 2003, I was told that the NF believed that progress was only possible if the other parties are undermined and marginalised, that attitude in my opinion is part of the NF's DNA and will never change. Whatever the sound logic of that, the fact remains that other parties exist, and such an attitude is bound to rouse hostility from other groups. It did from me anyway, but I have a strong belief that submission to another group or its philosophy constitutes a strong personal defeat - hence my hatred of organised religion.

The second current is the Brons-Lewthwaite axis. This is a northern based push to promote an alliance of northern-based parties and rebel BNP members around the DN Party, and employing a sportingly co-operative Andrew Brons MEP as their main event, with support from the England-First and British Movement. This for all its faults will be the better option for those seeking competent organisers to work with. Their website and propaganda could do with a makeover though but they appear to know their business.

Caught up in the currents are the London-based IONA and New Right, who appear to be a in quarrel with each other but these can be dismissed as talking shops, and they have been pushed down into the flyweight division since their recent loss of the late Jonathan Bowden, the talented orator. We may safely disregard the BNP from the equation now as I think we already know.

Opens two distinct possibilities:

1. The vast number of independent nationalists and freelancers have an greatly increased chance of influencing the shape of things to come. If, that is, we can drag them away from their PC's and present our common demands and grievances. There is an enormous pool of talent going to waste here.

2. If the DN Party/Brons axis is centred in the North and the NF camp operates out of London, the exception being East Lancashire, there exists a strong possibility of infighting over the influence of nationalism in East Lancashire. With a strong NF presence in Rochdale & Rossendale that feels no love lost against the England-First Party in Preston and the increasing DN Party presence in Burnley then we could see the real battle lines drawn in this "unity effort".

Interesting times lie ahead. The NF wouldn't attend the Unity meeting I attended in Burnley and the theme there was "Nationalism in One County".

This could be a highly intriguing time for an independent nationalist hoping to fight a by election in nearby Todmorden in November, with the Lancashire County Council seats up next year in May 2013.

I don't want to miss this history in the making.

David Jones,
Todmorden, East Lancashire.

Thursday, 26 April 2012

The Late Jonathan Bowden

The late Jonathan Bowden http://efp.org.uk/jonathan-bowden-1962-2012/   


The first time I heard him speak was at a London BNP meeting at St John's Church in 2008.  http://www.stjohnonbethnalgreen.org/ That meeting was targeted by Reds who came with weapons.  Fortunately, the police were on hand to protect us from their violence.

The speech mentioned both A K and G K Chesterton, which I am sure went above the heads of the assembled BNP members and supporters.  I am sure I missed some of the jokes too, being rather vague about the Chestertons.  My mother had a Father Brown Mystery.  I never read it, but perhaps I'll pick it up now.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Father_Brown

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Chesterton

The last time I saw him was in January this year when Jez Turner organised a cinema outing one Sunday. We saw CORIOLANUS at the Curzon Mayfair and then we had tea at a fashionable Piccadilly French pattiserie.

I remember him drinking the milk that came with my tea after I had finished drinking my tea, and that I gladly asked for more milk, for him, twice, as my back was just next to the counter.

He hardly spoke at all when we were having tea, and had to be invited to give his opinion on what he thought of the film.

We agreed that it was probably after Coriolanus's antics that started the Roman tradition of having a slave whisper to Roman triumphators "Remember, you are only a man," to stop the triumph going too much to their heads and becoming another Coriolanus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_triumph

I thought him a rather shy man who only came into own when he was performing.  His oratory was quite clearly a performance, in the grandest possible way and therefore unusual for this reason. No one I have ever heard speak declaims and entrances his audience in quite the same way he does when he is at his best.

To enjoy his speeches your really had to put your notebook down and let his words wash all over you and be swept away by it all.

I am sorry that he must have died a disappointed man and that more people did not hear his speeches.  Fortunately, for him and them, too, there is always YouTube.

I am sure aspiring imitators will find his style very hard to master indeed.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/coriolanus-movie.htm

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/london-forum-21-january-2012.html was the last speech I heard of his.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/36th-new-right-meeting.html was the last but one speech I heard of his.  

Friday, 20 January 2012

Claire Khaw *not* viper at New Right's bosom, more a brassiere ...


This really is scraping the barrel when we know how easy it is to share information on the Net and use the text and images of others simply by copying, cutting and pasting.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/12/36th-new-right-meeting.html has my report on the 36th New Right Meeting.

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/1516/new-right-same-old-nasties was what Matthew Collins cobbled together from my report.

On the strength of this Troy Southgate the paranoid organiser has now told me I am not welcome at the 37th New Right Meeting to be held in February.  That is a shame because when I spoke to him in December he seemed quite prepared to consider the idea of letting me speak.

"Claire Khaw had been allowed by the organisers to take pictures, but also posted a not quite complete report on her own website with the same spelling mistakes that in appeared in the HopeNotHate article and the same illustrations."

I can't find any spelling mistakes in either.

"Khaw is a close associate ... Khaw stood by her man throughout this scandal."

Jeffrey Marshall is very much his own man.   I certainly support Jeffrey and his comments since I am known to have made similar ones on the Victoria Derbyshire Show http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.htmland am particularly anxious that the subject of Libertarian Eugenics http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2012/01/principles-of-libertarian-eugenics.html and its opposite, Feminism, be discussed as a matter of national urgency along the lines at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/.

"Michael Newland ... 's fairly orthodox economic analysis went over the heads of some of the audience, including Khaw."

I actually admitted to falling asleep.  Had I been awake I would have understood, I like to think.

Monday, 12 December 2011

36th New Right Meeting

I am just more or less transcribing my incomplete notes, some of which are direct quotes of what I thought I heard.

First Speaker
DR JAMES THRING - Gaddafi's Nationalist People's Republic

Gaddafi wanted everyone to be heard in Parliament.  Anyone can go and you can imagine that this would be difficult to handle.

King Idris, overthrown by Gaddafi in 1969 in a bloodless coup, was installed by the British and the French.  He was their puppet who agreed that the price of oil would be fixed at US$2 with no inflation.   Gaddafi wanted a better deal for the Libyans and got this when he took over.

He also challenged the democratic model.  He was aware that electing politicians was not always democratic, for they will not always do what they are expected to do.  They may wish to keep their promises to voters but are prevented by their party leaders, who may in turn be pressurised.

Parties who win power generally win power with only 30% of the vote in any case.

Parties are always in need of funding.

Thatcher was advised to privatise by Jewish advisers to raise cash so so the nation's infrastructure was sold off for a song to Jewish business interests.

The UN is a permanent dictatorship by 5 permanent members.

Article 27 states that parties to a dispute eg Israel forfeit their right to vote on it.  The Chinese are timid about pointing this out.

Dr Thring then addressed the 4 matters on which the average Westerner might hold against Gaddafi.

1.   Gaddafi supported the IRA.

The US supported Israel.  Lots and lots of money have been given to the Israelis.  To be fair to the IRA, they always warned the police before they blew anything up.

2.  Lockerbie

House of Lords judges have held that the evidence against Libya was unreliable.

It is revealing that the UK didn't want it appealed since the Scots let Al-Megrahi go rather than have another trial.

Mr Bollinger (whom I understood to be speaking on behalf of the manufacturers of the chip of the circuit board that caused the explosion) was not allowed to see the chip in question and was only shown a photograph of it.

He declared that the one shown to him was not one of his.  The one in question was hand-finished and rough at the edges, those of his manufacture were always machine-finished.

This little thing was surprisingly discovered amongst the wreckage.

The damage to the plane was caused by an implosion rather than an explosion.

10 miles south of Locker was Chapel Cross, a nuclear power station which would, as you expect have defences against an aerial attack. Could the Pan Am plane have been shot down by the  RAF in error?

Dr Thring also mentioned the DEA stings which have bombs in suitcases that are handed over to the target that would explode to disable him.

3.  Yvonne Fletcher

The bullet entered her back at 60-70 degrees.  The Libyan Embassy was not tall enough for  someone shooting from any window there to do this.  There is however a nearby security firm with a building near the Libyan Embassy.  The bullet that killed Yvonne Fletcher was the same as the ones that killed Libyan diplomats, the police were told.  The police apparently forgot about this.

4.   Gaddafi allowed the PLO to train on Libyan soil.

5.   Gaddafi was implicated in the disappearance of  a Lebanese Shia cleric Imam Moussa Sadr.

It should be noted that Gaddafi was critical of Al Qaeda, trained by the CIA.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Crisis_Group
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_of_Youth_Movements

are, Dr Thring, suggested, organisations that go around destabilising the governments of other countries so they could be invaded under the pretext of protecting the human rights of their people.  

Dr Thring describes himself as a planner and first met Gaddafi in 1985 and attended various international Mataba Conferences.

Lady Michelle

2nd Speaker
LADY MICHELLE RENOUF
My Project with Gaddafi on the UN and the Jewish Republic http://jewishrepublic.com/

Lady Michelle described the 4 Classical Virtues: Balance, Harmony, Sense of Beauty, Temperance.  She extended the list with Natural Nationalism, a sense of justice, wisdom, scientific attitude, courage and empathy.

There is nothing about Truth in the Talmud.  The Jews are predatory, obsessed with racial superiority, vanity and greed.   They have the power of thraldom with their predatory imperialism.

"Any foreigner would loathe us," she said of the British and their dishonourable foreign policy.

Gaddafi embodied the metaphysical identity of the Libyans, she said.  If only the British had a similar leader, so that that the British can say that the kind of Britishness we respect is this kind of British.

She mentioned the people who refused to come to this meeting because they did not want to hear about Gaddafi and don't care about the Palestinians.

She said was opposed to racial supremacy but "we have to look at the economics of it".   "The world cannot function in a predatory way."

Supposing a fathers one child.  You may motivate that favoured child and cause sibling rivalry or low morale.

"Our predator's greatest gift is its plausibility" - its Swindlespeak and media hype.

"It is my absurd career in advertising that gives me the edge on them."

She then spoke of the Jewish Autonomous Republic of Birobidzhan, as big as Switzerland, that would accept Jews of Russia and any kind.  It has been in existence since 1928 and has been supported by American Jews too.   Its first language is Yiddish.  There are not many Jews there now as they have been have gone to Israel.   Many Jews have been seduced or forced to support Israel.

Vatican II was mentioned.  "The two covenants stand."  [I have no idea what she meant.]

Christianity and Islam are the dolphin religions.  Those religions have a sense of brotherhood.   The concept of brotherhood however is not present in Judaism, which she said is a "shark religion".

Gaddafi was insufficiently dictatorial.  In fact, he was a mere guide and didn't like posters of himself.  He said he wanted people to follow his teachings rather than heroworship him.

Lady Michelle said we need more witty, brilliant, authentic men like Gaddafi.

All US Presidential candidates have to be pro-Zionist.

She described her last meeting with Gaddafi as "bitter sweet" and was very proud to say that Gaddafi himself had said that he was proud of her.   The Libyans were proud of Gaddafi and their metaphysical identity, which he embodied.

"We need to be like soldiers."

"We want to enjoy genuine diversity [of our different races and our nations] rather than the Swindlespeak of diversity.

"The idea of international citizenship is absurd.  Nationalism fits us.  We need to trust our leaders to keep out our predator."

"We have a fantastic role model in Gadadfi."

"There is no nationalism in Israel."  [I am afraid I have no idea what Lady Michelle means.  Perhaps she meant that the ethno-nationalism of the Zionists is not really nationalism at all but a form of exclusive divisive tribalism?)

"The real role model is Gaddafi."

"We have to find like the Third Reich did: how high they can jump, their character, their environment and culture."

"It nearly conquered our predator."

[I apologise for the fragmentary nature of this account.  There will be a DVD of the talks recorded by Lady Renouf available at £5.  http://www.jailingopinions.com/contacts.htm]

Revisionist Xmas cards on sale at the meeting

3rd Speaker
MIKE NEWLAND: Are the Banks a Swindle?

Newland was trained as an accountant and was once BNP Treasurer.  Like me, he was expelled.  http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/index.php?link=template&story=84

Adrian Davis introduces Mike Newland

His talk dealt with the following:

1.   Why is economics so difficult?
2.   Fractional Reserve Banking
3.   Boom and Bust

I am afraid I fell asleep.

I woke up hear him saying we will have 10 more years of zombie economy.

Adrian Davis introduces the orator Jonathan Bowden

4th Speaker
JONATHAN BOWDEN: Yukio Mishima

I had the distinct feeling that most people there had not heard of Mishima but I have read and still have in my possession THE LIFE AND DEATH OF YUKIO MISHIMA by Henry Scott Stokes  http://www.amazon.co.uk/Life-Death-Yukio-Mishima/dp/0815410743/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323684847&sr=8-1

The humiliating defeat of Japan was internalised and the Japanese feminised.   There was little social anger towards the US, and Mishima felt that the Japanese had been mentally and morally invaded by the US.

The Japanese have manga comics through which they externalise rather than repress their transgressive urges.   Rapeman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rapeman was mentioned, a superhero rather like Spiderman.  It is both sadistic and erotic, said Jonathan Boweden.

The samurai were a soldierly elite.  They were learned warriors, infused by Buddhism, aesthetic masculinity, with the values of the praetorian elite and the Spartans.  They were a priestly and warrior caste and expected to write a death poem before they committed ritual suicide in the form of a haiku that would contain themes of gentleness and forgiveness.  Their values were similar to those articulated by D H Lawrence and Nietzsche.

Mishima asked: "Why did the emperor have to become a human being?"

The Orator Jonathan Bowden in full flow

Mishima asked for the impossible, for he asked for the return of things as they were in Japan before their defeat in WW2.  Probably, he expected them to be rejected so he could then commit ritual suicide, to show his disgust with and dissociation from modern Japan, to make his point.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukio_Mishima

Saturday, 24 July 2010

BNP DIRTY LINEN: Open letter from Paul Golding to Eddy Butler - 23 July 2010

--- On Fri, 23/7/10, Cllr Paul Golding wrote:

From: Cllr Paul Golding
Subject: Open Letter to Eddy Butler

Date: Friday, 23 July, 2010, 16:41

OPEN LETTER TO EDDY BUTLER
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER Cllr PAUL GOLDING

Dear Fellow Party Officer,

I was reluctant to send this email, but the truth is I have been
slandered to such a degree that I feel that I have no choice.

I have uncovered an outrageous lie against me and wish to openly
challenge the person responsible to withdraw their claim – but
first, the background to this nonsense needs to be explained.

Firstly I must make clear that I am in no way supportive of Eddy
Butler in his bid for the BNP leadership. This is no secret. I
feel he completely lacks the charisma, the oratory, the intellect,
the management skill, the vision, the flair and the dynamism
needed to be a leader of a party, and also feel that, based on
previous experience of working side by side with him that he is
egotistical, negative, rude ‘control freak’.  That is my
personal opinion based on my experience of him.

Shortly after the European Elections last year, myself, and
indeed, practically everyone with eyes to see, noticed that Eddy
Butler and Mark Collett were suddenly enjoying a cosy
relationship that baffled everyone, particularly given Mark
Collett’s well-known ‘hard-line’ Nazi position and Eddy Butler’s
long-standing position as a ‘liberal’ by normal nationalist
standards.

When Mark Collett was caught, not for the first time, trying to
defraud the party of tens of thousands of pounds by using dodgy
printers for large election print jobs, and after Mr Butler was
given an official warning for his antics and behaviour whilst
organising a trip to the EU (this is the now infamous incident
where, following a night of heavy drinking, including a trip
to a brothel, he was still so drunk the next morning that he kept
a whole coach load of activists waiting for an hour), several
other senior officials became aware of a growing chorus of
plotting and scheming by Mark Collett and Eddy Butler.

My observation during the period between the Euro Elections and
the end of 2009 was that Mr Butler was expanding his position as
National Organiser literally, he was acting as the ‘director
general’ of the party, trying to control everything in sight and
interfering in everyone else’s remits and responsibilities (even
though he had little ‘real life’ experience and had never been
more than a low level civil servant all of his working life,
strangely never ‘exposed’ by Searchlight).

I feel that whether he intended it or not, Mr Butler didn’t take
his position as national elections officer seriously any longer
and preferred to strut around as National Organiser trying to
have a say in all manner of party operations that weren’t his
business and evidently had not the faintest idea of what he was
talking about. Practically every staff member will testify to
this. The party, in my opinion, suffered because of this, in
by-election after by-election in 2009, and I find it a bit rich
that Mr Butler should now claim we need a ‘full-time’ elections
officer when he himself shunned the opportunity.

My experience of Eddy Butler was that he was/is a ‘control freak’.
He alone was a senior officer and everyone else is a mere minion.
He has a “I’m more senior than you ,so piss off” attitude –
everyone who knows him can attest to this. For example, one of my
remits within the party is fundraising. When the General Election
roadshow meetings were in full swing, Mr Butler decided it was a
good idea to hold his Eastern Region meeting in the same place,
same venue, hence same crowd, within 1 week, of the London
roadshow meeting. I advised him that, from a fundraising point
of view, this was not a good idea.

Eddy’s response was to ring me up screaming abuse at me, ordering
me NEVER to ‘interfere’ in ‘his’ region again. This outrageous
outburst of abuse against a well-meaning fellow party comrade
shocked me, and others, and I had no choice but to tell him to
refrain from using language like that towards me again. The main
bone of contention in this debacle was ego, I have no doubt about
this, as can be gauged from his reply to my email protesting at
his arrogance and rudeness: “I do not require advice on holding
meetings - the best place they should be, the attendees and so
forth from anyone - from top to bottom in this Party or associated
with this Party. I am probably the most successful ‘meeting
organiser in the history of the movement – not just the Party.”
He continued: “I hope my shouting on this rare occasion will not
put you off giving useful or even useless advice and ideas in the
future.”

What made me chuckle is that despite his arrogant and rude
outburst against me he went on to change his meeting completely
around and implement the changes I proposed in any case,
confirming that I was right all along. I have spoken to many,
many people nationwide with similar experiences of Eddy Butler,
and it seems to be an established pattern of behaviour.

The behind-the-scenes agitation of Butler and Collett culminated
in Mr Collett and Butler trying to recruit National Treasurer
David Hannam into a post-General Election Advisory Council ambush
of Chairman Nick Griffin. Their despicable and underhanded plan
was to falsely accuse Mr Griffin of financial wrong-doing, and
when the Chairman turned to David Hannam for a rebuttal, he would
remain silent, and by his silence he would condemn an innocent
man as a thief, can you imagine such wickedness? Thus the plan
was to force our democratically elected and totally innocent
leader to step down by means of lies and a stab in the back.
   
I also understand, because I have heard it with my own ears, that
Mr Butler is telling everyone a false and nonsensical version of
what happened regarding him and Mark Collett. How do I know the
truth? Because I have heard the Mark Collett recording for myself
and I am disgusted and shocked by the antics of Mr Collett and
Butler.

I am not the only one, the pre-General Election meeting of nearly
one hundred key officials was offered the chance to hear the
recording, and decided (for legal reasons) to delegate a small
group chosen from their ranks by them to listen to key sections
of it. This was done and Cllr. Michael Simpkins, a former RAF
Policeman, told the meeting that they were satisfied that the
recording was genuine, contained the material outlined, and
provided prima facie evidence of several serious criminal
offences including, threats to kill, theft, fraud, conspiracy
and false accounting. (Indeed an ongoing police investigation
is still underway regarding some extremely serious criminal
allegations).

I also applaud Nick Griffin’s decision, however advantageous it
would be otherwise to him personally, not to publish or release
the Mark Collett recording, as this would hand the media a huge
weapon to use against us (and Mr Butler knows this). If he did,
there would be a media storm against us like we have never seen
before, it could finish us, and to be honest Butler and Collett
aren’t worth it! (remember Jim Dowson’s wife Anne had a
miscarriage when informed by the police that a plot to stab her
husband at their home in Spain was explained to her).

Nick Griffin could finish Eddy Butler tomorrow and prove to
everyone that he is a liar by releasing the Collett recording,
but he refuses to because the greater interests of the party take
higher priority.

When Eddy and Mark Collett’s plan was uncovered via the
recording, Eddy Butler was offered the chance to resign with
dignity, and he did in front of witnesses.  He wasn’t sacked, he
resigned because he had no other option. As part of the deal for
his resignation, he was to hand back a USB memory stick that he
stole from Jim Dowson way back last JULY. Several Eastern Region
officers can verify that Eddy did indeed hand back the memory
stick that he stole as part of this deal. Ask yourself: what kind
of man steals from someone’s home/office whilst a guest in his
house?

Eddy Butler was also offered the chance of a European research
job working for Nick Griffin after the election as part of the
same face-saving package (scandal only helps our enemies), but
when the time came, he reneged on the whole deal, exploiting the
fact that Nick had taken him at his word when he agreed to
resign, so that he has since blagged several more months wages
from our financially hard-pressed party (the fact that we are
short of funds is no secret nor a surprise, given the fact that
Eddy Butler supporters are telling everyone not to give money in
an attempt to cause a crisis for which he can then pose as the
‘saviour’ and the bold Eddy still demands his £40.000 per year +
expenses from us). Threats of legal action are his ‘blackmail
weapons’ and his barrister mate Adrian Davies.
 
Like so many other decent nationalists, I am horrified by Eddy
Butler’s actions since he initiated his leadership ‘campaign’.
He has preached the need to clean up the BNP’s ‘image’ – this
despite his main ally being Naziboy and notorious crank, Mark
Collett. Eddy’s other supporters include various other ‘hard-line
wannabe cranks’ like mixed race Sharon Ebanks.

I am also horrified by his alliance with Simon Bennett, the
traitor who destroyed the BNP website during the election, when
we had record number of hits, shut down the media enquiries
system when I was handling over 100 media enquiries a day, and
crashed our internal email server, bringing our enquiries and
communications circulation to a grinding halt. Simon Bennett IS
Eddy Butler’s webmaster, despite his frequent and rather pathetic
tactical denials. Simon Bennett has recently been cooperating
with the Daily Mirror and UAF to spread anti-BNP lies. He has
recently destroyed Richard Barnbrook’s website and directed
Richards’s traffic to a pro-Butler site! How disgusting is that?

I am also shocked by Eddy Butler’s waffle regarding party
finances and ‘transparency’. I have heard a recording of Eddy
Butler stating that he has no proof of any wrong doing (this has
been repeated on his own website), and that the accusations of
wrong doing are in fact “a red herring”. This was played at a
meeting of Essex BNP officers recently and the cynicism of
Butler’s attempt to destroy Nick Griffin’s reputation with
unfounded lies raised a few eye brows.

You must also be made aware of Eddy Butler’s continuing agitation
against the party’s fundraising success. Eddy Butler is saying it
is terrible that we have contracted the services of a fundraising
professional who has raised our donations income from a paltry
£150,000 in 2007 to a whopping £1.6 million last year. He is
saying that his fees are too much, even though they are below
the industry average and all sorts of valuable extra services
are included in the contract for free. Well, my personal opinion
is that Mr Butler is saying these things for purely tactical
reasons as he needs to batten onto fresh gripes that he discovers
around the country to gain fresh support.

When a griper from the South West started whinging about
fundraising and Jim Dowson in mid-2009 Mr Butler took a very
different line. In fact read the following email to garner Mr
Butler’s true feelings about Jim Dowson and fundraising:

From: Eddy Butler
To: Peter Lucas
Subject: RE:
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:07:05 +0000

None of our appeals come out of thin air - all are run and
conceived by people - people who do it for a living and have to
be paid. That is what happends when people do things for a living,
in th real world. Your pathetic criticism at a time when the
Party is fighting for its survival does you no credit. If you
could find any normal charity (for example) that paid 92.5% of
its collections directly to the cause to which the funds were
donated then it would be truely remarkable. If you have a problem
with this then you have no place in this Party. If I see any
futrrther round robins of this nature coming from you disciplinary
action will follow immediately.
Eddy Butler
National Organiser

I would like to highlight the sentence, “Your pathetic criticism
at a time when the Party is fighting for its survival does you no
credit.” Perhaps you should heed your own words Mr Butler. Also
the sentence, “If you have a problem with this [fundraising] then
you have no place in this Party.” What a 100% turn around by Mr
Butler! He is criticising fundraising at a time when funds are
low due to the usual post-election exhaustion (and in part due to
his deliberate undermining of confidence and morale) and does
himself, in his own words, no credit.

Most disturbing to me is Mr Butler’s seemingly abundant support
from elements outside the BNP – elements that would like nothing
better than a large, professional and consolidated BNP trashed
and split up for their own benefit. For example, Mr Butler has
trumpeted the support of Jonathan Bowden, who is NOT a BNP member.
Mr Bowden has been chastised several times over the last year for
exclaiming that he is a ‘fascist’ at BNP meetings, and also
announcing his support for the Klu Klux Klan. He attends BNP
meetings with a cranky Viking rune around his neck, and his own
personal website is full of the most weird modern art you will
ever see, including a ‘painting’ of a woman putting her hands
down her knickers! Do we really want our party handed over to
such outside crackpots, just because they are old friends of Mr
Butler?

Sensible people must also be alarmed at the open and blatant
support Mr Butler is receiving on the websites of Searchlight,
Hope Not Hate and Unite against Fascism (UAF). These websites are
rolling out a non-stop and ferocious conveyor belt of hate and
lies against Nick Griffin, Jim Dowson, their families and other
hard-working and positive officials. Yet they are full of praise
for Mr Butler, repeating his empty campaign promises word for
word. You don't have to be Einstein to look at this and see
exactly what’s going on?

Many people who remember these leftwing organisations similarly
backing the list-leak traitors two years ago now look with
suspicion on the far-left’s blatant support for Butler. Couple
this with his seemingly effortless ability to survive with little
income and we have to question what is going on. How is Eddy
Butler, who has two families and refused to work for the BNP for
any less than £40,000 per year plus expenses, able to pay his
bills, buy new suits, travel the country and live worry-free and
finance this very lavish campaign of lies? It’s just not possible,
is it?

Also, as a dedicated nationalist and British patriot, I am
bemused by the coalition of fringe types Mr Butler has gathered
around himself. From militant homosexuals to outright Nazis, from
Holocaust deniers to a new Chinese member who wants the BNP to become multicultural, and so on. For example, Mr Butler has been telling anyone who will listen, that the thief Mark Collett’s
ex-girlfriend Shelley Rose is a ‘plant’ and a ‘wrong un’…now he
has put her face on his website! Shelley Rose has embarrassed
the party with her anti-Jewish remarks and is known as an
extreme Nazi who has been chastised for attending National Front
Marches and Blood & Honours gigs.  Likewise, Richard Edmonds was
going to be kicked off the Advisory Council several months ago
for attending the release from prison of the world’s most
prominent Holocaust Denier.

Then there is Mr Butler’s close links to the Membership List
Leakers. I was handed Mr Butler’s old party phone by an Eastern
Region official a short while ago, and I asked a techy friend of
mine to re-import his contacts list from the cache memory, which
he did. To my surprise Mr Butler had the numbers of Sadie Graham,
Kenny Smith and the internet crackpot and Butler supporter Sharon
Ebanks on his contacts list.

Then I am told by a reliable Scottish friend of mine that when Mr
Butler visited Scotland recently he actually visited Kenny Smith,
one of the Sadie Graham traitors (now ask yourself: why wasn’t
any pictures of this Scottish trip put up on his blog? Hmmm.) Now
his promises on his blog that former members will ‘rejoin’ makes
perfect sense.

I have been told by many officials, especially in the Eastern
Region, that support for Mr Butler is melting away as his
alliance with Nazis, homosexuals, transvestites (Tony Ward) and
outsiders, together with his tacit support from Searchlight and
Co, becomes too much to stomach. These outrages coupled with his
own recent admission  that he has no proof to back up any of his
financial claims is waking people up to his campaign of lies.

Faced with his sinking ship, he is playing the “I’m being
stitched up card” to gather sympathy, not support. Take, for
example, his recent big hoo ha about the suspensions of several
officials in Liverpool and the South East. After Sadie Graham and
Co leaked the BNP membership list and caused untold suffering for
BNP members and supporters, isn’t it right that we protect our
membership lists from abuse?

There exists a law called the Data Protection Act and it obliges
us to certain rules and regulations, such as one that states that
sensitive personal confidential data must ONLY be handled by
legally registered party officers. In the South East, the
official Richard Trower handed a BNP membership list to two
people who were NOT legally registered officers of the party.
This abuse of the rules resulted in complaints from BNP members
as to why their personal details were being handed around like
confetti at a wedding.

Richard Trower and the two others were suspended – after several
warnings - for abusing what should have been a confidential BNP
membership list. It is hard enough for us to recruit new members
because of the list leaks, so we must act strongly against those
who leak membership lists to people who are not party officials.

Likewise in Liverpool, I myself started receiving complaints from
the PUBLIC as to why their personal details were circulating
amongst those who are not legal officers of the party. When the
time comes and the Information Commissioner asks us why this
happened, we could only escape by saying: “A former official kept
hold of his membership list, and used it for non-party purposes.
As a consequence, he has been suspended.” Nothing less than that
would get us off the hook. Again, bugger all to do with support
for a leadership candidate, just compliance with the Data
Protection Act and a desire to keep our membership lists safe and
secure.

Anyone who passes a BNP membership list to non-party officers
will be suspended regardless of who they support. Any former
officials who abuse BNP membership lists for non-party use will
be suspended. If these rules don’t exist and are not enforced,
then anarchy will reign and our membership lists will leak out
on a regular basis, destroying any credibility to recruit that
we have.

Back to the main purpose of this open letter. I have uncovered a
blatant lie about me and feel that I have the right to defend
myself. It is not the first time Mr Butler has attempted to
degrade my reputation: he has accused me on many occasions of
running the blog Eddy Butler Exposed, something which is
completely untrue. In any case, Mr Butler has, despite spending
years attempting to close down BNP blogs and forums around the
country, set up several blogs and websites of his own (designed
and maintained by the traitor Simon Bennett) all spouting his
lies and empty promises – it seems when one, just ONE, blog in
opposition to his campaign crops up it is a terrible event.

It has come to my attention that Eddy Butler has been circulating
a vicious and outrageous lie against me. I received a phone call
a short while ago from the long-standing and well-respected
Bexley Organiser Mike Jones, who asked me if I had drawn £20,000
in expenses in the last 6 months. How I would ever get away with
drawing £3,300 in expenses per month is anyone’s guess!

After my laughter at such a ludicrous claim subsided, I replied
that it was completely untrue and enquired where this nonsense
had come from. Mr Jones replied that he had a call from Michael
Barnbrook who told Mr Jones that he had been told all this by
Eddy Butler.

Mr Jones has confirmed that he is willing to swear to all of
this, if necessary in a court of law or a party tribunal. Mike
Jones and Michael Barnbrook are good friends and I have no reason
to disbelieve that any of this is untrue. I doubt very much that
Michael Barnbrook would lie to his good friend Mike Jones, and I
have no reason to believe that Mike Jones would lie to me. Both
are honourable men and long-standing BNP activists, and Mike
Jones in particular has been a member for 13 years.

If all this is true, then Mr Butler is a disgrace and I demand
that he openly withdraws this allegation against me and publishes
a retraction on his website/blog. If, on the other hand, he now
denies making it, then he should make it crystal clear that he
recognises that, whoever was responsible for the allegation, it
is totally untrue.

I am sorry to have to send this to all Eastern and London region
officials, but I am incensed by Mr Butler’s lies against me and
want people to know the truth, or at least a different side to
these events for a change.

I have been asked by the Eastern Region RO Paul Morris to clear
the air and show everyone in the Eastern Region the dreaded
recording that Mr Butler is making such a huff about. To be
honest, I am sick and tired of all this nonsense. I work hard
for the BNP and am perhaps the most active senior member apart
from the Chairman. I get up in the morning and graft until I go
to bed, every bloody day. I have clocked up tens of thousands of
miles darting around the country. I am a serious and dedicated
nationalist through and through. I am not an Eton educated guy
but I am no mug, and I am honest. I make no secret of the fact
that I am deeply disappointed in Mr Butler for what he has done
and is continuing to do. I am 28 and I have freely chosen the
path of unremitting, relentless service to our cause and our
party because I want, more than anything, a future for my little
baby daughter. Make of me what you will.

So if you want to listen to the recording of Eddy Butler in
question then click on the following link. Make of it what you
will. I don’t care to be honest. It is not my recording to start
with, I downloaded it from you-tube. But if you want to listen
to it then here you are:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu2ux_yJOrM

Cllr Paul Golding
National Communications Officer

PS: Just in case you were wondering if you will be lumbered with
Mark Collett once again if Eddy Butler succeeds, Eddy Butler
spent a large chunk of his speech in Leeds recently defending
Mark Collett and heaping praise on him, much to the disgust of
the local people.

Eddy Butler's response can be read at http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2010/07/statement-by-eddy-butler-regarding.html

Wednesday, 21 July 2010

Eddy Butler's leadership challenge meeting 20 July 2010

Shelly Rose Bedfordshire Organiser with Eddy Butler
 Michael Barnbrook and Richard Edmonds 

 Richard Edmonds explaining the awfulness of the new BNP constitution and how impossible it was to get a copy of it.  Was something "medically wrong" with Nick Griffin, he wondered?  The BNP was told by the court to remove the infamous miscegenation clause in March 2010, but this was not done and the offending section 3.2.2 reappeared in Annex 3 of the 12th edition of party constitution dated 9 April 2010 (page 83)  incurring unnecessary legal costs the Party can ill afford.  http://www.bnp.org.uk/constitution-british-national-party  The constitution remains riddled with offending sections that will give the EHRC plenty of reasons to come back for more blood making the Party incur yet more legal costs. 
Shelly Rose the Bedfordshire Organiser and Una Rice, explaining to the camera how to deal with the nomination form sent by the party and the nomination form sent by Eddy Butler. 

DERECK BEACKON
The meeting began an hour later than stated.  I was introduced by Jeffrey Marshall to Derek Beackon  the first BNP councillor elected in 1992 General Election - a historic first.  We shook hands and his manner was gentle and mild unlike the hell-raising Nazi Fascist Extremist Racist the media potrayed him in old news reports. He also wore rather less frightening glasses than the ones I remembered from old news reports.  


RICHARD EDMONDS
Richard Edmonds chaired the meeting and he looked younger and stronger than I remembered when I last heard him speak.  His headmasterly bellow promptly stemmed our chatter and commanded our silence. 

He began brandishing the infamous objectionable 12th edition of the BNP constitution.  92 pages of nonsense, he called it.  It was much better in the old days when it was only 15 pages long.

http://www.thenationalparty.org.uk/constbnp

He reminded us that the BNP are a democratic nationalist party.  We were all present freely of our own will and had every right to do so.  Indeed, Section 7 (page 27) allows a leadership challenge every year.  

Then he began by praising Jim Dowson of Midas Consultancy, an "outisde businessman" being paid £2,000 a week.  This works out to be £90,000 per year as well as the £72,000 per year paid to the Call Centre in Northern Ireland.  Dowson was not a member, but a businessman.  The last Advisory Council meeting held in March discussed at great length Dowson's "outside consultancy".  He "no smudge, no fudge, quite impressive and a very powerful speaker".  He was also described as "completely frank and open as well as a very dynamic businessman" who answered every question fully and frankly. 

The 12 Regional Officers however, are not paid.  We were reminded that £7,500 per month goes to Jim Dowson for his consultancy fee.

It was Richard Edmonds view that "all party business should be done in-house."

Mailshot letters of appeal with Nick Griffin's signature were also the work of Jim Dowson, "an outside businessman".  Edmonds said he was "shocked to the point of being frightened at the direction the Party is heading."

Jonathan Bowden - the talented and transporting BNP orator - would have spoken but was prevented from doing so by transport and traffic problems.  Eddy has his complete support.  http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2010/07/statement-from-jonathan-bowden.html

MICHAEL BARNBROOK was then introduced.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagenham_and_Rainham_%28UK_Parliament_constituency%29

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2010/01/29/sleeze-buster-michael-barnbrook-ppc-dagenham-and-rainham/


http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23712701-mayors-former-deputy-to-face-fraud-inquiry.do


He began by saying he arrived at the meeting unaware that he was supposed to be speaking.  It was disconcerting to find his voice moved by emotion.  Indeed, he was actually tearful.  He has been "stressed out" by this whole business.  He had considered himself "a nobody" in the Party but from the way he was being treated, one would be forgiven for thinking that he or Eddy were "probably the most dangerous person in the BNP.  The whole business had put his marriage under a strain.  As far as he was concerned, the leadership contenders were "nice people" and he "genuinely didn't want to get involved" in the leadership challenge.  Eddy Butler, the leadership challenger, had reduced the 1000 Tory majority in Bexley to a mere 8.  Eddy Butler, as far as Barnbrook was concerned, "has not destroyed the General Election campaign" and should not have been removed from his post as National Organiser.

He was a self-confessed Griffinite who has been bothered by phone calls ever since he agreed to a meeting with Eddy Butler, who understandably wants to lobby big-hitter members of influence.  Apparently, Nick Griffin and/or his Praetorian Guard are so steeped in paranoia that they thought Eddy was about to pass him documents that would get him into trouble with the law.  Barnbrook then said he was already 67 with only 3 years' membership of the party while Eddy has "the personality of a flatfish" and "no one knows him".

We laughed in surprise and I quickly glanced at Eddy to see if he too was enjoying the joke.  Eddy was indeed smiling.

Barnbrook then admitted that while everybody who was inclined to support the Party "loved Nick Griffin", this was regrettably not the case as far as the activists and organisers were concerned.



He declared the leadership nomination form he received an insult to his intelligence for the reasons explained at http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2010/07/dirtier-and-dirtier.html
See heading "Yellow Peril"  (This is not in fact a reference to the BNP being swamped by the Chinese but to the colour of the official and offending nomination form.)

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/bnp-elections-department-outlines-leadership-contest-regulations

If you believe that Richard Barnbrook and Derek Adams are not spoiler candidates (candidates with no chance of winning but put forward with the intention of preventing Eddy from getting the 840 nominations required to trigger a leadership challenge), then you must have an IQ of under 10, Michael Barnbrook went on to say.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/leadership

He has ended the careers of at least 12 MPs and the career of Ian Clement and wondered why he was not given more credit for this in the run-up to the leadership election.  He did not want praise and acknowledgment from the Chairman for egotistical reasons, he said, but because all this sleaze-busting of expenses irregularities might have given the BNP more votes in the run-up to the General Election

The implication was that the Chairman wished not to acknowledge the contribution of others to the Nationalist cause and sought to identify the BNP with himself alone.

Clarity, probity and transparency are required and only a leadership election would clear the air and save the reputations of both Nick Griffin and Eddy Butler, he said.

The point was that one could be a Griffinite and still want a leadership challenge, to clear the air, and he therefore urged everyone who cared about the Party, irrespective of their personal loyalties, to see to it that the Party gets one, Barnbrook concluded.

Video of meeting on 20 July 2010:

Part 1 - Michael Barnbrook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_SFRdlYE38
Part 2 - Michael Barnbrook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqeEfn6s-L0
Part 3 - Michael Barnbrook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqeEfn6s-L0


Christine Mitchell on Paul Norris and Paul Golding on the Eddy tapes.  It is claimed Eddy "condemned himself" at a meeting at which I was present.  The person who came out of it worst was not Eddy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEutwTVp8lQ&feature=player_embedded

Part 1 - Eddy Butler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGY6VbhQ5-o
Part 2 - Eddy Butler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bI80KzOvbLw
Part 3 - Eddy Butler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBAYIG2vfdQ
Part 4 - Eddy Butler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bO-b9nvMj9A
Part 5 - Eddy Butler
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GkwVd0Vabw

My photos used in Eddy Butler's blog at http://eddybutler.blogspot.com/2010/08/statement-relating-to-jim-dowson-by.html

Christians irrationally choose a Higher Power when they could have the support of the Supreme Power

  8:44 @OfficialSecularKoranism ​​You can beat alcoholism with AA *and* a Higher Power 15:46 @OfficialSecularKoranism ​​If we have the Highe...