Translate

Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 February 2020

What is the difference between science and philosophy?

Science is about what is or isn't and what can or can't be done while philosophy is about whether something should or shouldn't be done.

Philosophy is the answering of moral questions eg what should or shouldn't be done in the national interest.

When answering a question of what should or shouldn't be done, one must base one's answer on facts that are agreed on.

First, establish the facts. Then, decide what should or shouldn't be done on that basis.

Science uses the inductive logic, philosophy uses deductive logic.



Philosophy is the love of wisdom. Those who love wisdom would be wiser than those who do not. Wise people can form accurate conclusions and make accurate predictions with the minimum of information, foolish people do not even know they are being fools.

https://www.aish.com/j/j/51475187.html

After months of negotiation with the authorities, a Talmudist from Odessa was finally granted permission to visit Moscow.

He boarded the train and found an empty seat. At the next stop, a young man got on and sat next to him. The scholar looked at the young man and he thought: This fellow doesn't look like a peasant, so if he is no peasant he probably comes from this district. If he comes from this district, then he must be Jewish because this is, after all, a Jewish district.

But on the other hand, since he is a Jew, where could he be going? I'm the only Jew in our district who has permission to travel to Moscow.

Ahh, wait! Just outside Moscow there is a little village called Samvet, and Jews don't need special permission to go to Samvet But why would he travel to Samvet? He is surely going to visit one of the Jewish families there. But how many Jewish families are there in Samvet? Aha, only two -- the Bernsteins and the Steinbergs. But since the Bernsteins are a terrible family, so such a nice looking fellow like him, he must be visiting the Steinbergs.

But why is he going to the Steinbergs in Samvet? The Steinbergs have only daughters, two of them, so maybe he's their son-in-law. But if he is, then which daughter did he marry? They say that Sarah Steinberg married a nice lawyer from Budapest, and Esther married a businessman from Zhitomer, so it must be Sarah's husband. Which means that his name is Alexander Cohen, if I'm not mistaken.

But if he came from Budapest, with all the anti-Semitism they have there, he must have changed his name.

What's the Hungarian equivalent of Cohen? It is Kovacs. But since they allowed him to change his name, he must have special status to change it. What could it be? Must be a doctorate from the University. Nothing less would do.

At this point, therefore, the Talmudic scholar turns to the young man and says, "Excuse me. Do you mind if I open the window, Dr. Kovacs?"

"Not at all," answered the startled co-passenger. "But how is it that you know my name?"

"Ahhh," replied the Talmudist, "It was obvious."



Wednesday, 10 June 2015

British scientist who told truth made to resign by feminazis and their mangina running dogs

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/10/nobel-scientist-tim-hunt-female-scientists-cause-trouble-for-men-in-labs

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jun/11/nobel-laureate-sir-tim-hunt-resigns-trouble-with-girls-comments


David Colquhoun - No 1 Mangina Running Dog of Feminazis who have Feminazified British Science





http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/tim-hunt-how-public-shaming-harms-academia/www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/10/nobel-scientist-tim-hunt-female-scientists-cause-trouble-for-men-in-labs#.VXn1MvlViko

David Colquhoun, emeritus professor of pharmacology at University College London, said Hunt’s comments were a ‘disaster for the advancement of women’. But are women scientists really so fragile that they’ll be discouraged by a flippant comment made on the other side of the world? The assumption that they will give up, or never get going in the first place, because of a throwaway sexist sentence just repeats the ‘crying over criticism’ point Hunt is being slammed for making – albeit in an apparently more caring form.

My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power

Tuesday, 4 May 2010

The girlification of science

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00s3h44#synopsis

Can scientific development and innovation push the economic recovery forward? The authors of a new report "Big Potatoes: The London Manifesto for innovation" believe so. Launched at the Royal Society the report highlights how there is currently very little debate in society about research and development. It has become socially acceptable not to know about science, argue the authors, and this change in public and political attitude is stifling economic recovery as well as limiting future innovation and therefore the creation of new industries and jobs for the future. Quentin is joined by one of the reports co-authors Professor James Woudhuysen and the former vice-president of the Royal Society, Sir Martin Taylor.


Looks like the British are well f*cked then.

British scientists now think that asking people what photos they prefer using to represent themselves on their Facebook profiles as they get older is science. Apparently, as people get older they shy away from showing photographs of themselves and show pictures of objects, landscapes, gatherings etc.

Something to do with the middle-age spread, double chins, balding pates, greying hair and wrinkles, I'll wager.

These idiot programme-makers think asking girly questions that wouldn't look out of place in a woman's magazine is science!

No doubt it is all part of their agenda to attract girls into doing science.

These girly-men who collude in this exercise of the feminisation and dumbing-down of science should be ashamed of themselves.

Just have a look at this crap:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/BBC-So-You-Want-to-Be-a-Scientist/116570741697536?ref=ts#!/pages/BBC-So-You-Want-to-Be-a-Scientist/116570741697536?v=wall&ref=ts

http://www.facebook.com/pages/BBC-Profile-picture-experiment/118289904857603?v=app_2347471856

Doom! Doom! Matriarchal dementia is now engulfing Britain! Abandon ship! Abandon ship!

The American Conundrum can be solved by Secular Koranism

11:45 AM @OfficialSecularKoranism #3 ​Can a moral inventory be made of US foreign policy? 11:46 AM @YawnGod ​​"Listen...if we don't...