@Janekelly25 @toadmeister Jews hoist by their own petard when they denounced anti-immigration parties complaining about Muslim immigration.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@Janekelly25 @toadmeister Because Jews refused to support anti-immigration parties, they stopped Muslim problem being addressed.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@Janekelly25 @toadmeister @spectator If there were no Muslims in the West, nobody would care about the oppression of the Palestinians.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@Janekelly25 @toadmeister @spectator The anti-Semitism problem is a Muslim problem, the Muslim problem is an immigration problem, right?— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
The parameters of what the gentile and Muslim may say and think about Jews is being determined by a feminist Asian woman and a Jew.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@Misanthropicguy @SirDickOfHearts @MichaelWhite More Muslims in Labour than the Tories, Muslims would be anti-Semitic cos of neocon policies— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@PhilMerrylfc @MichaelWhite @LouiseMensch Anti-Semitism is endemic to Christian Europe and has been so for centuries.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@r0g3rd4y @MichaelWhite Many are grateful to Ken Livingstone for highlighting and reminding us again of the extent of Jewish power.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@r0g3rd4y @MichaelWhite There are more Muslims in Labour than the Tory Party. Muslims understandably sympathise with the Palestinians.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@LinHelenGreen @MichaelPDeacon @gavinesler More Muslims in Labour therefore more votes in dog whistle anti-Semitism. It's that simple.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
Julie Burchill agrees with me. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julie-burchill-labour-party-jew-7877106
@CrowdenBen @MichaelPDeacon John Mann MP wanted to receive another anti-Semitism prize from his Jewish masters in America. It's that simple.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mann_(British_politician)
In May 2009 John Mann received the American Jewish Committee's Jan Karski Award in recognition of his commitment to fighting antisemitism in all of its forms.
What would you have dealt with Naz Shah if you had been… — I would tell her to watch her anti-Semitism in future, … https://t.co/qbQBgKh4yk— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
How would you have dealt with Ken Livingstone if you ha… — Ken me old china? I would have unhesitatingly and uncom… https://t.co/MhAIczud3v— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
How would you have dealt with the media if you were Lab… — If I had refused to discipline Nazi Shah and Ken, they … https://t.co/mxedUco1Wq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
How would you have dealt with the Jews' whingeing if yo… — I would have told them that they are the targets of hat… https://t.co/Es3MRrs2Xu— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
What is the solution to anti-Semitism? — The imposition of Secular Koranism in Israel, the abolition of the usurio… https://t.co/pZNs9AaISY— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
Is it quite fair to blame British Jews for America's ne… — They go along with it. Anyone who goes along with neoco… https://t.co/Udz9KUgRTb— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
Nobody bothered to check who created that "anti-Semitic" image Naz Shah retweeted, did they? https://t.co/P1FU2W8gjv via @MidWalesMike— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016
@waltsandall @JasonFarrellSky My theory: @ken4london thought he was defending @NazShahBfd by saying anti-Semites can be Zionist.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @JasonFarrellSky My theory: @ken4london then realised that if Zionists can also be anti-Semitic, then so was @NazShahBfd— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky What would make @ken4london massively popular is if he said people should be free to hate people.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky It is ridiculous that debate should be crippled by all sorts of PC minefields to trap the unwary.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky Political debate should not be a parlour game of avoiding saying certain words, should it?— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky There are many important affairs of state that should be discussed as a matter of urgency.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky I bet politicians crippled by treachery and paranoia don't even discuss politics with each other.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky It is just STUPID for the state to say we can't hate protected groups but can unprotected groups.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky If only @ken4london would say he wants to repeal the Equality Act 2010 before he gets expelled.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky Equality Act 2010 protects certain groups from criticism by the white gentile male - ABOLISH IT.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If I am hated by Jews, does that make *me* an anti-Semite? I would have thought not, but people are so hysterical and irratonal. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
Surely 2b an anti-Semite, I wd have to say things that show I hated Jews rather than be merely "guilty" of being hated by Jews? @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If we are forbidden by the state to hate certain groups then doesn't that mean we live in a state which has THOUGHTCRIME? @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
How does @libertyhq feel about living in a state which has THOUGHTCRIME legislation forbidding us from holding certain opinions?— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If people re told by govt not to hate something, they wd wonder at the probably sinister political reasons for this prohibition. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
Preventing people from criticising Jews or Israel suggests that UK foreign policy must never be questioned. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If the govt passed a law forbidding criticism of Jews and Israel, what do you think the people would think it is trying to do? @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
Criticism of Jews includes criticism of Israel, criticism of Israel implies criticism of Jews. They cannot really be separated. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
Why do you think the neocon Blairites want to silence the anti-neocons in @UKLabour? In order that they can be better neocons. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If the people are forbidden to criticise Jews and Zionists, they would get round this by criticising neocons. So bring it on. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If the government forbids the criticism of neocons, people would get round this by criticising UK foreign policy. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
If the govt then forbids people from criticising its foreign policy, we would all know who is behind its foreign policy. @libertyhq— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@RabbiZvi Maybe Labour should just expel all its Muslim members? Is this what its Jewish members want? @jeremycorbyn @SeumasMilne— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
@RabbiZvi What would people will think if @UKLabour expels all its Muslim members? @mehdirhasan himself admitted they r mostly anti-Semitic.— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
What would happen if @UKLabour expelled all its Muslim members at the behest of the Jews? Would anti-Semitism increase or decrease?— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016
Let’s not beat around the bush any longer. The “anti-Semitic” label is conveniently and consistently applied by British power-brokers to silence any criticism of the illegitimate Zionist entity of “Israel”, writes Dr Abdul Wahid.
Labour inquiry professor has links to group that says antisemitism claims are "baseless"
No comments:
Post a Comment