The only one state solution that could work in Israel

Ivanka Trump attended the dedication ceremony of the new US embassy in Jerusalem in May 2019

The only one state solution for Israel that could work in theory would be a legal system based on the Koran ie sharia.

Secular Koranism is a New School of Sharia.

A survey on Secular Koranism is at https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV

For observant Jews, sharia would just be a walk in the park. According to the Talmud, righteous gentiles are only required to observe the Naohide laws, while Jews are required to observe 613 laws. The Noahide laws are a minimum moral standard for gentiles. Observant Jews should have no difficulty agreeing to living under sharia because that is already a significantly lower standard than their 613 laws.

The problem is that most Jews are not observant and the majority are Liberal Democrat voting Jews who now want to topple Trump by toppling the statues of the American Founding Fathers. Trump, by relocating the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, has stuck his neck out to an unprecedented and some would say unnecessary extent.

US consulate general in Jerusalem merges with embassy

It would be interesting to see how many liberal principles are in direct conflict with the principles of Judaism.

How many Liberal Jews are there to every observant Jew?

Which is the more authentic Jew - the Observant Jew or the Liberal Jew?

If Liberal Jews are the majority, does this mean that the Observant Jew can never be an archetype of Jewishness? But without Judaism, Jews wouldn't even exist. It can therefore be concluded that being the majority is no way linked to whether you are right, even if you are Jewish.

Do liberals even know what their principles are now?

Jews are in a better position to know what their principles are and can look them up if they don't, but liberals these days support no principle other than that of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting and the maligning of the achievements of their own ancestors. If all Jews followed liberal principles such as can be discerned from the current practice of those who identify themselves as liberal eg globohomo, they would soon become extinct. It is possible that God would allow Jews to become extinct once they have done what they were supposed to do ie impose a minimum standard of law and morality on the rest of the world through the setting of standards, but the time is not now, because Western gentile nations are very far from being Noahide. Israel's protector, America, in fact promotes globohomo, which is arguably satanic, if Satan can be defined as rebellion from God's laws. 

Israel is the jewel in America's crown

All great empires seek to administer Israel. Administering Israel is like a billionaire owning a yacht, or a football team.

Before America administered Israel, it was Britain. Before Britain did, it was the Ottoman Empire.

Empires also have status symbols and The Holy Land of Israel is the ultimate status symbol.

If Israel were anything more than an American Protectorate, it would be a theocracy, as it was meant to be, but it is not. Israel is a liberal democracy promoting neoconservatism, neoliberalism, feminism and globohomo.

If Israel were anything other than an American Protectorate, it would not be forced to be a liberal democracy, like the rest of the American Empire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93United_States_relations

Late Republican Senator Jesse Helms used to call Israel "America's aircraft carrier in the Middle East", when explaining why the United States viewed Israel as such a strategic ally, saying that the military foothold in the region offered by the Jewish State alone justified the military aid that the United States grants Israel every year.

My row with Perthian Will, a former Muslim

From 5:16:00

6:17:00  Spree Killers: The Forefront of Knowledge

Simon Sheppard explores the mind of the spree killer http://www.heretical.com/sgs-2013/sprees.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_Down

On Jennifer Scharf/Church of Entropy and her ideas

Secular Koranism should be ideally conducted as a pilot study in Israel

It saddens me that Yoram Hazony who wrote The Virtue of Nationalism (which I have been promoting enthusiastically since I heard of it) blocked me as soon as I followed him on Twitter.
A modern reason for Post-Christian Antisemitism https://t.co/kOcQcj2r6N

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I do hope he does not think I am an antisemite, though I have made the observation that the worst thing you could do to a Jew is force him to follow his religion properly. Am I an antisemite because Jews hate me?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have also said that it if Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. It cannot be denied that Judaism is really the most effective form of ethno-nationalism because it allowed Jews to remain Jewish without a homeland for 2000 years.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have also said that if God exists and made Jews His Chosen People, and allowed them to remain in existence and return to their homeland after 2000 years, He surely must have intended Israel to be a theocracy. The only Rabbi to have agreed with me was the late Rabbi Kahane.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I don't see why this can't be discussed by senior rabbis. The answer is obvious to me, but it seems Jews want to escape this inescapable conclusion, probably because they fear the loss of US protection because they suspect the Americans just wouldn't support a theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

If God exists and wants Israel to be a theocracy, then He cannot want and expect Israel to remain a mere colonial outpost of an empire whose laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum standards of the Noahide laws, surely?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have considered becoming an Orthodox Jewess to become a member of the tribe that is the aristocracy of humanity and am well aware of the restrictions I would have to endure to be in good standing with my Holy Community. It would be awkward for Israel to be a Torah theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

God if He exists would not, I imagine, be too fussy about whether Israel is a Torah theocracy or a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. Israel could first try Secular Koranism and if it works for them, the rest of the world could adopt it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Secular Koranism is that it is also based on the Koran, and could be said to be a form of sharia but as interpreted by me, an agnostic formerly liberal feminist non-Muslim. I like to think this would mollify the Palestinians somewhat. https://t.co/Cjb0EBeWUA

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Secular Koranism is that it is also based on the Koran, and could be said to be a form of sharia but as interpreted by me, an agnostic formerly liberal feminist non-Muslim. I like to think this would mollify the Palestinians somewhat. https://t.co/Cjb0EBeWUA

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The enmity of the Palestinians would be stayed, because they would in spite of themselves be interested to see if my proposed social and religious experiment works on the Israelis. In this way Israel could be like Scheherazade and eventually gain favour. https://t.co/a8CsY1G3cz

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Should my proposed pilot scheme of Secular Koranism to be conducted in Israel succeed, then it would be adopted worldwide, making the world a more peaceful place after restoring the patriarchy ie marriage and family values worldwide. What's not to like?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The other question I want senior rabbis to discuss is which religion the gentile should adopt now that Christianity is obviously kaput. Which is more in conformity with the Noahide laws? a) idolatrous Christianity b) monotheist Islam Surely the answer is only too obvious?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Islam is that it would ban usury and this would help prevent from getting into trouble with the gentile again over the tendency of individuals (both Jew and gentile) and governments to lend and borrow irresponsibly until slavery and collapse is the result.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I was very heartened to note that the conciliatory position of @rabbisacks towards Islam discussed at https://t.co/42iquu3cR0 is in harmony with the narrative I have woven.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Yoram Hazony should know that I have met Rabbi Sacks twice and even have an autographed book by him. I am sure Lord Sacks could in some way assure him that I am not really so dangerous. Oh, and I have also met and have an autographed book by @MelanieLatest too. @davidhazony

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

In the biblical story of Abraham’s funeral, @rabbisacks finds a prophecy of Jewish-Muslim reconciliationhttps://t.co/gCOVRrSbXM pic.twitter.com/eiZgU85RoF

— Mosaic (@mosaicmag) November 2, 2018

Isaac represents Jews, Ishmael gentiles. If the gentile were properly informed and rational, he would have allowed Islam to supersede Christianity with the support of the rational Jew, for Islam is undeniably more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

If Jews are the light unto the nations, then Israel must be its pilot light. Therefore Israel must be a theocracy and should submit to the pilot study proposed at https://t.co/ZBnpUxXUg8

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Why Christianity has failed

Once you admit that Christianity is kaput, then Islam is the only option. The alt-right already know this, and that is why they won't give me a platform, just like mainstream media - an entire civilisation in denial.

Liberals are always wittering on about reforming Islam. To reform Islam, the West itself has to adopt it.

Muslims have been sent to punish Christians for their idolatry.

Muslims have been sent to punish Israeli Jews for suffering Israel to become the mere colonial outpost of a declining and hatred empire that is obviously suffering from dementia.

Israel should of course be a theocracy.

If Christianity had not already failed, then the Post-Christian White Nationalist would not be forever moaning about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims as well as daily in fear of alienating the feminist females he wishes to impregnate and bear his legitimate offspring whom he already knows would not dream of marrying him.

Even if he managed to find himself a wife, he would fear not being able to support her and having to send her out to work making her more likely to divorce him under the rules of no fault divorce. This means he is always in fear of his wife getting so irritated and bored with him that she will divorce and deprive him of the matrimonial home and his children for no reason at all other than her boredom and irritation.

If Christianity had not already failed, the West would be full of Christian husbands and fathers in control of their families. Not for a moment would they suffer themselves to be treated like slaves and fungible commodities while those who come after them go to the head of the queue.

Make no mistake, the Feminist State has no intention of giving up Transnational Progressivism Transnational Progressivism however many elections are held and referenda conducted.

They have no intention of playing by the rules or sticking to it. Their idea of the rule of law is to shamelessly change the rules of the game while the game is still in play, to rig the outcome.

The beta male victim of feminism is also being censored and has no one to speak up for him. The men who could be his leaders are too busy looking after Number One to think of taking any risk or making any sacrifice on behalf of the beta male victims of feminism whose numbers daily increase.

In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the immoral woman who despises the men of her own race and nation and who has no intention whatsoever of ceasing the uncontrolled immigration that she knows upsets and distresses her menfolk more than they are legally allowed to say.

It is therefore ironic in the extreme then that I, a female and a racial foreigner, am the only person who has ever consistently warned and advised them in the strongest possible terms, at some risk and sacrifice to myself, but there it is: life is full of such surprises.

Why liberal democracy was to blame for the Balfour Declaration

http://www.jpost.com/Blogs/A-Mid-East-Journal/The-Balfour-Declaration-why-Lord-Rothschild-505748

A question rarely asked is why Balfour addressed his letter to Lord Rothschild, rather than to Sir Stuart Samuel, president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews. After all, the Board of Deputies, its origins going as far back as 1760, was – and remains – the body officially representative of Britain’s Jewish community. The Board has been storm-tossed on many occasions during its long life. The reason it was not the recipient of Balfour’s historic communication is connected with a particularly tempestuous episode in its history.

Because, damn it, it was Lord Rothschild who donated to the Conservative Party and the Balfour Declaration was a thank you letter from Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild.

Oh, but did Lord Rothschild make a donation to the Conservative Party, you ask.

Oh, but can you prove that he made no donation to the Conservative Party in consideration of the Balfour Declaration? 

And if it can be proven that Lord Rothschild made a very generous donation to the Conservative Party in consideration of the Balfour Declaration, what does it say about democracy?

While members of the Chinese Communist Party are undoubtedly corrupt in that they are known to take bribes, would they have been in the position of so casually robbing Peter Palestinian to pay Paul Jew after a second ruinous World War? 

In any case, Arthur Balfour must have thought he hedged his thank you letter to Lord Rothschild with all kinds of caveats, but they are treated now as if they were either never made or never infringed.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-rothschilds-and-their-200-years-of-political-influence-969772.html

The Rothschild family and politics have been intertwined for generations, ever since Nathan Rothschild, who founded the English branch of the family business, financed Britain's war against Napoleon two centuries ago. Nathan was the son of Mayer Rothschild, who founded the family business in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt during the 18th century.

Serena Rothschild, Nat Rothschild's mother, was one of the largest individual donors to the Conservative Party last year. She gave £190,000. She has also helped fund Mr Osborne's office. 

When another member of the clan, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, married the New York businesswoman Lynn Forester, they spent the night of their wedding dinner in the White House as guests of Bill Clinton. Lady Rothschild was a fund-raiser for the Democrats, but defected to the McCain camp after her friend Hillary Clinton was beaten to the nomination by Barack Obama.

www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rothschild-introduced-oligarch-donor-to-tories-6294844.html

This letter seems very casually done, mindful of its own mealy-mouthed platitudes. I have seen the original too at Waddesdon. Why was not better quality paper used? Where is the headed notepaper?

Some investigative journalism, please! 

And finally, ask yourself whether if Britain had been a one party state whether donations would be so desperately sought by political parties and so eagerly accepted from donors who appear to be asking for something that seems unlikely to cause any trouble to the current generation and who do not care what happens to subsequent generations. When the shit hits the fan, they expect to be long gone, and most of these unprincipled fuckers are atheists and LGBTs with no biological investment in the next generation and no thought for posterity, the national interest or the national reputation. Arthur Balfour never married and died in 1930. His most remembered saying was:

Nothing matters very much and few things matter at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Balfour

Claire Khaw in conversation with John Collins on 27 August 2017

9:00  Women in the workplace got John Collins sacked from his job.


28:00  John Collins thinks Millennial Woes had a girlfriend who was complaining about him to a male friend of hers who was looking to move in on her.  This man will be her next victim, he thinks.


31:00 Depression and Millennial Woes.


33:00  Women who say "I need a new husband/car/house/holiday etc" and get one but are still miserable when they get it.


43:00 John Collins: "If feminism were given its proper name, feminism is the borderline personality disorder acceptance movement."

49:00 John Collins disputes the claim of Millennial Woes that the academic left are planning the destruction of the West. Greg Johnson prepared to use the death of anyone at a demonstration to further the message of the alt-right.


50:00  "Violence will be seen as the only solution if ....  "


52:00  Millennial Woes not prepared to discuss how civic nationalism can get ethno-nationalists what they want.



53:00 John Collins comments on Millennial Woes' position on National Socialism.


54:00  Pogroms  All the countries who conduct them feel sheepish about them afterwards.


55:00  John Collins: "There is no political will for a white ethno-state."


58:00  THOUGHTCRIME and the Equality Act 2010


59:00  John Collins says he has been demonetised because he is a friend of Matt Forney.

1:00  Jews have been around for longer than the Chinese.

1:05  The failure of Christianity in maintaining morality in the West


1:06  Islam is about making the rules clear.


1:07  Jews and Muslims respect marriage and the family, Muslims in Rochdale.


1:13  Narcissism


1:16  Religion and the narcissist eg LGBTs


1:17  Homosexuality and child abuse


1:21 Nostalgia, the narcissist, Millennial Woes and Manichaeism


1:26  The Cerebral Narcissist


1:28  Sam Vaknin
https://www.youtube.com/user/samvaknin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Vaknin


1:31  Power, authority and Hillary Clinton

1:32  Trump

1:33  Israel


1:35  Communist infiltration, organised criminality, CIA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_vs._Spy

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/perverse-subjection-of-men-to-women-in.html


1:35  Communist infiltration, organised criminality, CIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_vs._Spy

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/perverse-subjection-of-men-to-women-in.html


1:40 According to John Collins, Millennial Woes is simplistic, childlike, dangerous to young people appealing to their sense of victimhood and in and out group preferences. His leadership qualities are also untried. Race war, Rochdale, child abuser who lived across the road from John Collins who operated in the 1980s and went on in the 1970s, dirty mac flashers, Cyril Smith, KGB, CIA, MI5. Muslims gangs simply exploited this state of affairs that had been going on for decades. Gillick Competence.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillick_competence  Under-age sex.

1:51  While John Collins was having his heart attack, suppressed memories from his childhood surfaced. "The things you don't do shape the person you are." 15 and 16 year old girls blackmailing a drug dealer, his niece and her classmates, cat-fishing and blackmailing men who had unknowingly had underage sex with them. Sex with 27 men.

2:00  Millennial Woes plays the victim to elicit sympathy to manipulate you into protecting him and his race - a feminine stratagem. Millennial Woes is more dangerous than Richard Spencer as a recruiter. John Collins says Millennial Woes is like Fagin. Followers of Millennial Woes drawn to the alt-right because they are drawn to father figures and strong men, having been deprived of their fathers by their mothers.


2:05  John Collins: "Millennial Woes is not that self aware. He is being seen as a father figure by a generation of lost boys."


2:08  Greg Johnson says he is hedonist, according to John Collins.

https://www.thecut.com/2017/04/jack-donovan-philosophical-fascists-of-the-gay-alt-right.html

https://altright.com/2017/06/01/greg-johnsons-attacks-and-how-to-deal-with-them/


2:10  Davis Aurini discussed. According to John Collins, he is a poor judge of character, is a co-dependent and has issues with his father.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/livestream-with-claire-khaw-feminism.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/my-disappointing-evening-with-davis.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/a-pagan-odinist-questions-effectiveness.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/would-you-like-me-on-davis-aurini-again.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/sex-and-strategy-with-davis-aurini-and.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/davis-aurini-calls-claire-khaw-white.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/davis-aurini-asks-me-why-i-am-obsessed.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/youtubers-complain-about-claire-khaw.html


2:11  Matt Forney

Jordan Peterson: Thoughts on Islam and homegrown 'hatred'

"The search for moral clarity" he refers to is an understandable and predictable reaction against restrictions feminism imposes on the male psyche.

"A lot of the things that the ordinary person regards as moral get exaggerated in these situations and become pathological. That's part of what makes it so tricky. This really tight in-group identity that is in many ways indistinguishable from loyalty.

This drive to be dominant and messianic is very difficult to dissociate from striving for achievement.

These things start to become pathological when the person's viewpoint becomes closed to other information. That's where totalitarianism starts to develop."

Peterson seems to think religion and politics can be separated. Time to correct this fallacy.

Interestingly, he goes on to make the point that Israel does not know whether it is secular or religious.

It is obvious to me that anyway Israel of all countries should be a theocracy. Jews are the product of Judaism. For Jews to deny and reject their religious origins would be a denial of their Jewish identity. While individual Jews can reject their religious identity and should be allowed to do so, it is not for Jews as Israeli citizens in the Holy Land of Israel to do so.Peterson seems to think religion and politics can be separated. Time to correct this fallacy.

Interestingly, he goes on to make the point that Israel does not know whether it is secular or religious.

It is obvious to me that anyway Israel of all countries should be a theocracy. Jews are the product of Judaism. For Jews to deny and reject their religious origins would be a denial of their Jewish identity. While individual Jews can reject their religious identity and should be allowed to do so, it is not for Jews as Israeli citizens in the Holy Land of Israel to do so.

Jews are also victims of the matriarchy

https://rtd.rt.com/films/no-woman-no-crime/

Israeli women lie in divorce, 99% commit perjury


Keith Joseph and Maurice Glasman were Jews who sacrificed their careers and became victims of the matriarchy to speak what they believed to be the truth.

Do not blame Jews for the insanity of our matriarchy. Blame the matriarchy itself consisting mostly of white middle class feminazis in public life who despise men of their own class and in the class beneath them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherchez_la_femme
 
Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened' 

Joseph's hopes of reaching the top were killed off by his 1974 speech.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman

Asked by the Daily Telegraph's Mary Riddell whether he would support a total ban on immigration, even if just for a temporary period, Lord Glasman replied, "Yes. I would add that we should be more generous and friendly in receiving those [few] who are needed. To be more generous, we have to draw the line."

In response to a further question on whether he supported Welfare Secretary Iain Duncan-Smith's call for British jobs for British workers, he responded, ""Completely. The people who live here are the highest priority. We've got to listen and be with them. They're in the right place -- it's us who are not."

Labour Justice spokeswoman Helen Goodman circulated a critique of Blue Labour to all members of the Parliamentary Labour Party in which she claimed, "[Glasman] characterises as female all the aspects of New Labour he dislikes, whereas all the characteristics he applauds he draws as male. It looks more like something suitable for the psychotherapists' couch than a political tract."

Feminism causes anti-Semitism (as well as degeneracy, dementia, immigration and paedophilia) 

Will Jews bring about world peace by declaring Donald Trump to be their Messiah?

"A common modern rabbinic interpretation is that there is a potential messiah in every generation."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah#Judaism

Watching https://t.co/bcYkpTAkST made me long for @realDonaldTrump to be the Messiah. Is this possible, @RabbiZvi?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

Wouldn't it be lovely if @realDonaldTrump really was the Messiah? I DEPLORE the way so many Jews don't believe their Messiah will ever come. https://t.co/tvYqWrEQfF

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

When you think about it, @realDonaldTrump is one in a billion, and he is undeniably messianic. So why can't he be the messiah, @RabbiZvi?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

Jews who don't believe their messiah will come are like people who say they are Christians but don't believe in the Trinity. https://t.co/Zi38yR6XwJ

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

What is the highest rabbinical authority to consult on whether @realDonaldTrump could be the Messiah, @rabbisacks and @chiefrabbi?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

I think once MSM announce that @realDonaldTrump is the Messiah, we will have peace in the Middle East and world peace. Worth a try, surely? https://t.co/OhPW37FoXM

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

I predict these Conservative Jews will not be open to the idea of hailing @realDonaldTrump as their Messiah. Who shall I try next? https://t.co/UcdXRs4MqL

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 21, 2017

The best thing Jews can contribute to world peace is to acknowledge @reaDonaldTrump as their Messiah. How about it, @UnitedSynagogue?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

The best thing Jews can contribute to world peace is to acknowledge @reaDonaldTrump as their Messiah. How about it, @UOSofSA?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

The reason why @realDonaldTrump doesn't have to be Jewish to be the Messiah is because Balaam was a Jewish prophet without being Jewish.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

The moment Jews declare @realDonaldTrump to be their Messiah, all his deep state problems would disappear in a puff of smoke.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

A way of addressing rising anti-Semitism would be for Jews to declare @realDonaldTrump to be their Messiah. I really think this would work.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

Think about it: if you really were the Messiah, you'd go straight to America and get into @WhiteHouse, wouldn't you? @realDonaldTrump has.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

https://t.co/uuEnJ1vbNC From 15th minute: CHILLING SINISTER THREATS are being made against @realDonaldTrump by THUGGISH ex-Mossad agent.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

@dunstablian Jews must do something more to address the problem of anti-Semitism other than whingeing about it, which tends to intensify it.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

A way for MSM to redeem themselves is to declare @realDonaldTrump to be the Messiah after all the mean things they've been saying about him. https://t.co/eieZv4EAoA

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) February 22, 2017

Trump at Lincoln Memorial: ‘I’m just the messenger’

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophets_and_messengers_in_Islam

http://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/33467/among-the-gentiles-why-job-and-bilaam-were-recognized-as-prophets-whereas-muham

Michael Scheuer says 50 anti-Trump Republicans should be "retired" and "ignored"

Republican security experts rail against Trump in open letter

Open letter signed by 50 Republican national security experts warning that nominee Donald Trump "would be the most reckless president" in US history

Incoherent blather from General Hayden from 24th minute.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07mvxwr

From 28th minute

Michael Scheuer:

General Hayden presided over the shredding of the Fourth Amendment when Obama and Bush spied over every American with their electronic equipment. 

On the question of the letter, I think Mr Trump should be delighted. Two days from now is twenty years since Osama Bin Laden declared war on us, and everything we have tried to do has been negative. All of the young men and women who have lost lives and limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan did it for nothing. There's no freedom there, there's no liberty there and in the course of these unnecessary wars there is less liberty at home.

Martha Kearney:

But you know how important the role of the President is as Commander in Chief and these are fifty senior Republicans and many of them hold very high positions in different administrations and they say he is going to be the most reckless President in American history and has many dangerous qualities. 

Michael Scheuer:

More reckless than Obama who just paid $400,000,000 to ransom four Americans? His State Department and your Foreign Ministries in Europe connived with the Ukrainian opposition to bring down a pro-Russian government and re-started the Cold War. What could be more reckless than that?

Martha Kearney:

Well, I think the argument goes to temperament, doesn't it? You can have policy differences and people may well disagree with the direction that President Obama has taken but what these Republicans are saying crosses the political divide - is that his temperament makes him unsuitable for the job?

Michael Scheuer:

I would prefer him not to be so vocal at times, but I also like someone who says what they think and what he says is that America should come first. As we speak, I'm looking at pictures of British Special Forces operating in Syria. We were out of the Iraq-Syria mess and now we are back into it. What kind of governments do we have? We are letting in unvetted Syrians and I read in your press this morning that you're going to give political asylum to Muslim Brotherhood people from Egypt. I think the old gang which is represented by the list we are speaking of deserves to be retired and deserves to be ignored.

Martha Kearney:

But interestingly you say you wish he wouldn't be quite so vocal - and you may be right about that - and the way we judge him by is the kind of thing he's saying on the campaign trail and that is giving some people the impression that he is reckless such as the people who signed the Republican letter.

Michael Scheuer:

I can't speak for your media but I don't mind what he says except for the fact that the media here is in a tank this morning for Hillary Clinton. You played a clip from ABC in America and of course their main person George Stephanopoulos is owned by the Clintons and as a journalist gives money to the Clinton Foundation and other Clinton Organisations ...

Martha Kearney:

Well, that might be the case but it's not the case with the people who signed this letter, is it?

Michael Scheuer:

Oh, the people who signed the letter! If you go down the list, they're the ones who want America to be intervening everywhere around the world. They're the New World Order people, they're the ones who brought us all these unnecessary wars. If you go down the list, there is also at least thirty people who prize the interests of Israel more than the interests of the United States, and that's the real rub for a lot of them, that's the real rub for the Republicans, that America is no longer going to get involved fighting Israel's wars. 

Martha Kearney:

Dr Michael Scheuer, many thanks for joining us.

http://non-intervention.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scheuer 

Israel and America are one nation. Who knew?

The Office of Rabbi Sacks together with LSJS, US Living and Learning & Koren Publishers invite you to this special shiur to launch the Weinstein Family Edition of the Koren Sacks Shavuot Machzor. 

https://billetto.co.uk/en/events/shavuotmachzor

Koren Sacks Mahzor Series – A growing body of Hebrew-English holiday prayer books that fuses the translation and commentary of Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks with the unique design and layout of Koren Publishers Jerusalem. The liturgy includes a modern English translation and features prayers for the State of Israel, Israel’s Defense Forces, Welfare of the Government and the Safety of the American Military Forces. The Koren Sacks Rosh HaShana Mahzor was released in 2011 and was named a 2011 National Jewish Book Award finalist by The Jewish Book Council. The Koren Sacks Yom Kippur Mahzor was released in 2012 and the Koren Sacks Pesah Mahzor was released in March 2013. The Jewish Press calls the introduction to the Koren Sacks Pesah Mahzor "a thematic and theological entree to the very essence of Passover."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machzor#Popular_versions

In the Middle East and Persian Gulf, we seek to foster regional stability, deter aggression against our friends and interests in the region, protect U.S. nationals and property, and safeguard our access to international air and seaways and to the region's oil. The United States is committed to the security of Israel and to maintaining the qualitative edge that is critical to Israel's security. Israel's confidence in its security and U.S.-Israel strategic cooperation contribute to the stability of the entire region', as demonstrated once again during the Persian Gulf War. At the same time, our assistance to our Arab friends to defend themselves against aggression also strengthens security throughout the region, including for Israel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfowitz_Doctrine

Its critics have stated it acts as an agent of the Israeli government with a "stranglehold" on the United States Congress with its power and influence. The group has been accused of being strongly allied with the Likud party of Israel, and the Republican Party in the US, but an AIPAC spokesman has called this a "malicious mischaracterization." The Washington Post described the perceived differences between AIPAC and J Street: "While both groups call themselves bipartisan, AIPAC has won support from an overwhelming majority of Republican Jews, while J Street is presenting itself as an alternative for Democrats who have grown uncomfortable with both Netanyahu’s policies and the conservatives’ flocking to AIPAC."

AIPAC, on the other hand, describes itself as a bipartisan organization, and bills it lobbies for in Congress are always jointly sponsored by both a Democrat and Republican. AIPAC's supporters claim its bipartisan nature can be seen at its yearly policy conference, which in 2016 included both parties' front-runners (Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump), as well as high ranking Democrats, including Vice President Joe Biden, and high-ranking Republicans, including Speaker of the House Paul Ryan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Israel_Public_Affairs_Committee

A narrow and broad definition of anti-Semitism

Some sophisticated people are saying that while an antisemite used to be a person who hates Jews, he is now a person who the Jews hate. 

https://engageonline.wordpress.com/2016/05/06/the-job-of-labours-inquiry-is-to-navigate-the-party-back-into-thebroad-rational-consensus-on-antisemitism-david-hirsh/

Labour's inquiry must navigate the party back to democratic consensus on antisemitism. https://t.co/9qxIuJp3T0

— David Hirsh (@DavidHirsh) May 6, 2016

@DavidHirsh Is there such a thing as a "democratic consensus on anti-Semitism"?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

Is there such a thing as a "democratic consensus on anti-Semitism" as @DavidHirsh claims? If so, what is it? https://t.co/xJ0zIkXucE

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh I have read your piece and the answer to that question is as clear as mud.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh I would anticipate that you would want the definition of anti-Semitism to be broad as possible so the charge is easily made out.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh What do you mean by @jeremycorbyn "accounting for his political history"? @SeumasMilne @STWuk @ken4london @PeoplesMomentum

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

Please read this carefully and tell me exactly what @DavidHirsh is proposing here in his abstraction of abstractions https://t.co/xJ0zIkXucE

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh In your piece you do not once mention US foreign policy. Why is that?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Muslim @SadiqKhan winning by so great a margin against Jewish @ZacGoldsmith is a reaction against accusations of anti-Semitism.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Would you agree that Jews complaining about anti-Semitism actually increases it?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh There should of course be a legal and objective definition of anti-Semitism so everyone knows where they stand.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh There is a suspicion that you want the definition of anti-Semitism to be made out on the basis of how many Jews are offended.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Do you want the definition of anti-Semitism to be as wide and vague as possible to instil a fear of speaking on the subject?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Have you considered that gentiles are tired of treading on eggshells every time they want to discuss Hitler/Jews/Israel/Zionism?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Have you considered that restrictions on discussing Hitler/Jews/Israel/Zionism actually increases anti-Semitism in the gentile?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale I suspect @DavidHirsh just wants to reinforce a neurotic fear in the gentile politician about discussing Hitler/Jews/Israel/Zionism

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale Like the Twelve Tables of Rome, but I'm sure that's the last thing @DavidHirsh wants.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale I believe Jews want gentile politicians to believe that saying the wrong thing about Hitler/Israel/Jews/Zionism wd be career-ending

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Have you considered that the victims of US neocon foreign policy ie Muslims have increased their hostility to Jews generally?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh Even if @UKLabour expelled all its Muslim members as a gesture of submission, would complaints of anti-Semitism cease?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh It is not only Muslims who are bothered about America's neocon wars that it has cajoled NATO members into fighting.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@Mohammed_Amin The anti-Semitism row also helped Sadiq Khan, probably, when Muslims who might have voted for Goldsmith voted for Khan.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh It is silly to forbid people from hating certain protected groups of people. It would only create more hatred.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh The existence of thoughtcrime legislation is in itself evidence of ideological suppression.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh Examples of thoughtcrime legislation: Equality Act 2010, Blasphemy Act 1697, Holocaust Denial laws.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

How would Jews like the new definition of anti-Semitism to be? @libertyhq @davidhirsch https://t.co/YLJPi2oAoc

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh But that is exactly what Zionists and a pro-Zionist government would wish to prevent.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh https://t.co/cvvWIGUncW was the Islamic equivalent of the First Amendment. The Bible has no equivalent of this.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh The British government would be complicit with Zionists in preventing discussion of British foreign policy.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh The Blasphemy Act 1697 made it a crime to deny the divinity of Christ, effectively criminalising Jews and Muslims.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @DavidHirsh The Equality Act 2010 forbids holding certain views on protected groups and acting on them. Thought is discrimination.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh The British government is pro-Zionist simply because it would regard itself as the midwife of Zionism.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh My bottom line: there should be no thoughtcrime legislation protecting any group/person from being hated.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh All anti-discrimination legislation is thoughtcrime legislation and all of that should be repealed.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh Zionists would find the definition of anti-Semite as anyone whom Jews hate for any reason very convenient.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh Our emotions are an integral part of us. How dare the state tell us whom we may or may not hate?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh Saying that a certain person or group must not be hated only increases resentment against him/her/them.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh There are already laws forbidding us from acting on our hatred ie committing crimes against those we hate.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@grehale @libertyhq @DavidHirsh Allowing people to express their hatred is a safety valve, especially if it is legitimate criticism.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

@DavidHirsh @grehale @libertyhq Free speech is meaningless when we cannot express our hatred or state the reasons for it.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 7, 2016

More questions for Shami Chakrabarti and Dr Feldman on anti-Semitism

@Janekelly25 @toadmeister Jews hoist by their own petard when they denounced anti-immigration parties complaining about Muslim immigration.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@Janekelly25 @toadmeister Because Jews refused to support anti-immigration parties, they stopped Muslim problem being addressed.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@Janekelly25 @toadmeister @spectator If there were no Muslims in the West, nobody would care about the oppression of the Palestinians.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@Janekelly25 @toadmeister @spectator The anti-Semitism problem is a Muslim problem, the Muslim problem is an immigration problem, right?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

The parameters of what the gentile and Muslim may say and think about Jews is being determined by a feminist Asian woman and a Jew.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@y_alibhai @mehdirhasan @ZacGoldsmith Good luck telling people not to hate other people.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@Misanthropicguy @SirDickOfHearts @MichaelWhite More Muslims in Labour than the Tories, Muslims would be anti-Semitic cos of neocon policies

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@PhilMerrylfc @MichaelWhite @LouiseMensch Anti-Semitism is endemic to Christian Europe and has been so for centuries.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@r0g3rd4y @MichaelWhite Many are grateful to Ken Livingstone for highlighting and reminding us again of the extent of Jewish power.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@r0g3rd4y @MichaelWhite There are more Muslims in Labour than the Tory Party. Muslims understandably sympathise with the Palestinians.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@LinHelenGreen @MichaelPDeacon @gavinesler More Muslims in Labour therefore more votes in dog whistle anti-Semitism. It's that simple.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

Julie Burchill agrees with me. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/julie-burchill-labour-party-jew-7877106

@CrowdenBen @MichaelPDeacon John Mann MP wanted to receive another anti-Semitism prize from his Jewish masters in America. It's that simple.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Mann_(British_politician)

In May 2009 John Mann received the American Jewish Committee's Jan Karski Award in recognition of his commitment to fighting antisemitism in all of its forms.

What would you have dealt with Naz Shah if you had been… — I would tell her to watch her anti-Semitism in future, … https://t.co/qbQBgKh4yk

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

How would you have dealt with Ken Livingstone if you ha… — Ken me old china? I would have unhesitatingly and uncom… https://t.co/MhAIczud3v

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

How would you have dealt with the media if you were Lab… — If I had refused to discipline Nazi Shah and Ken, they … https://t.co/mxedUco1Wq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

How would you have dealt with the Jews' whingeing if yo… — I would have told them that they are the targets of hat… https://t.co/Es3MRrs2Xu

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

What is the solution to anti-Semitism? — The imposition of Secular Koranism in Israel, the abolition of the usurio… https://t.co/pZNs9AaISY

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

Is it quite fair to blame British Jews for America's ne… — They go along with it. Anyone who goes along with neoco… https://t.co/Udz9KUgRTb

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

Nobody bothered to check who created that "anti-Semitic" image Naz Shah retweeted, did they? https://t.co/P1FU2W8gjv via @MidWalesMike

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 1, 2016

@waltsandall @JasonFarrellSky My theory: @ken4london thought he was defending @NazShahBfd by saying anti-Semites can be Zionist.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @JasonFarrellSky My theory: @ken4london then realised that if Zionists can also be anti-Semitic, then so was @NazShahBfd

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky What would make @ken4london massively popular is if he said people should be free to hate people.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky It is ridiculous that debate should be crippled by all sorts of PC minefields to trap the unwary.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky Political debate should not be a parlour game of avoiding saying certain words, should it?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky There are many important affairs of state that should be discussed as a matter of urgency.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky I bet politicians crippled by treachery and paranoia don't even discuss politics with each other.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky It is just STUPID for the state to say we can't hate protected groups but can unprotected groups.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky If only @ken4london would say he wants to repeal the Equality Act 2010 before he gets expelled.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@waltsandall @NazShahBfd @JasonFarrellSky Equality Act 2010 protects certain groups from criticism by the white gentile male - ABOLISH IT.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If I am hated by Jews, does that make *me* an anti-Semite? I would have thought not, but people are so hysterical and irratonal. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

Surely 2b an anti-Semite, I wd have to say things that show I hated Jews rather than be merely "guilty" of being hated by Jews? @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If we are forbidden by the state to hate certain groups then doesn't that mean we live in a state which has THOUGHTCRIME? @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

How does @libertyhq feel about living in a state which has THOUGHTCRIME legislation forbidding us from holding certain opinions?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If people re told by govt not to hate something, they wd wonder at the probably sinister political reasons for this prohibition. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

Preventing people from criticising Jews or Israel suggests that UK foreign policy must never be questioned. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If the govt passed a law forbidding criticism of Jews and Israel, what do you think the people would think it is trying to do? @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

Criticism of Jews includes criticism of Israel, criticism of Israel implies criticism of Jews. They cannot really be separated. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

Why do you think the neocon Blairites want to silence the anti-neocons in @UKLabour? In order that they can be better neocons. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If the people are forbidden to criticise Jews and Zionists, they would get round this by criticising neocons. So bring it on. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If the government forbids the criticism of neocons, people would get round this by criticising UK foreign policy. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

If the govt then forbids people from criticising its foreign policy, we would all know who is behind its foreign policy. @libertyhq

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@RabbiZvi Maybe Labour should just expel all its Muslim members? Is this what its Jewish members want? @jeremycorbyn @SeumasMilne

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

@RabbiZvi What would people will think if @UKLabour expels all its Muslim members? @mehdirhasan himself admitted they r mostly anti-Semitic.

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

What would happen if @UKLabour expelled all its Muslim members at the behest of the Jews? Would anti-Semitism increase or decrease?

— Claire Khaw (@Patriarchalist) May 2, 2016

Let’s not beat around the bush any longer. The “anti-Semitic” label is conveniently and consistently applied by British power-brokers to silence any criticism of the illegitimate Zionist entity of “Israel”, writes Dr Abdul Wahid.

Labour inquiry professor has links to group that says antisemitism claims are "baseless"