Translate

Showing posts with label China. Show all posts
Showing posts with label China. Show all posts

Monday, 6 July 2020

Statue-toppling iconoclasm in China

Friday, 27 July 2018

British masochism should not be indulged in the case of Ian Simpson

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5642515/Children-fashion-boss-knifed-death-wife-kept-prisoner-grandparents.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bbn749  From 1:33:00


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-44966901




2:30  International School  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_school My dear father says that non-white children who go to international school become neither fish nor fowl.
12:45  UKIP couple have foster children removed from care
17:00  Cultural diffences in expressing opinions and emotions  http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/chinese-and-westerners-10-common-misunderstandings
21:00  How James O'Brien became the conscience of liberal Britain 
25:00  Pisa: At-a-glance global education rankings in science, maths and reading
32:45  Proms among music festivals pledging 50/50 gender split in lineups https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/feb/26/proms-music-festivals-gender-pledge
35:15  Female Police Officers  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bbq3vp
39:30  Nationalism, group solidarity, tribal loyalty  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_mentality
46:00  Did Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson make the nation swallow a poison pill? 
47:00 Here today and gone tomorrow leaders in the establishment and against it 
49:30  James O'Brien not wanting to appear jingoistic but asks if we should let foreign companies buy our national utilities
50:00  Dying people live in the past and so do dying nations and civilisations
51:30  The lies we are expected to believe from the presstitutes of BBC https://pages.uoregon.edu/tbivins/stratcomweb/notes/lying-notes.pdf
55:00  The Fisherman and His Wife  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fisherman_and_His_Wife
56:00  Abolishing the licence fee
57:00  Official state channel
58:00  Social justice = intersectionality = feminism = degeneracy
1:00:00 Using deductive reasoning to put 2 and 2 together to make 4 and to avoid and solve problems is now considered fascist 
1:04:00  Personal responsibility
1:05:00 Slut shaming  
1:06:00 Gay pride
1:07:00  https://quran.com/24/2 - the 100 lashes punishment for sex offenders in town squares and village greens
1:09:15  Polygamy
1:10:00  Good looking men
1:12:00  A Muslim man can have up to four wives  https://quran.com/4/3
1:16:00  A social history of porn https://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/review/314
1:17:00 Nuns in nunneries
1:19:00 The murder rate between spouses and intimate relationships is probably higher than between other relationships http://fathersforlife.org/fv/fbi_spousal_murder_stats.htm

Monday, 12 October 2015

Claire Khaw championed in vain Helen Goodman's right to speculate on Jeremy Hunt's wife's reasons for coming to England

My tweet in response to Helen Goodman's asking "If China is so great why did Jeremy Hunt's wife come to England?"on Sunday evening 11 October 2015.


Deborah Orr:

"Of course, what Hunt admires about China and the US is not the superior character of its citizens, but the fear of absolute penury that forces them to survive on the wages that the market declares them to be worth. Self-respect, for him, is simply acceptance of the low financial value that capitalism places on your time and your skills. Self-respect, in Hunt’s book, is actually respect for him, for the system that he champions and for the judgments that system makes on you."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00r3qyw

http://news.bbc.co.uk/local/cambridgeshire/hi/people_and_places/newsid_8530000/8530168.stm




Feminism, the welfare state, and insane foreign policy that provokes terrorism from Muslim radicals are trashing the UK.




Saturday, 12 September 2015

A nationalist on Jeremy Corbyn becoming Labour leader

By Andrew Slade:

First Communication

"Khaw Byn [sic] rightly wants to leave NATO which the NF has been urging for forty years or ore. Why lock ourselves into Yankee Imperialism? It denies us our nationhood, negates our right to national self-determination (which the Yanks claim is God-given and then they take it away again). NATO is part of the New World Order (=Joo World Order) which demands that we become a multi culti mish mash failed multi culti society and everything her has to be owned by Americans like the foreign devils in China under the Dowager Empress, while our people live on food bands and in homeless shelters, in debt from cradle to grave ... "

 Second Communication

Jeremy Corbyn has adopted some longstanding British Nationalist policies.

1)  Leaving NATO has long been a long- term aim of radical Britons, both on the Left & the Right, because we see the organisation as a sinister curtailment of our national sovereignty, an emanation of American- Jewish imperialism; a force working in favour of failed multi-culturalism against our Peoples' National interest. Far from defending our Nation & Peoples, NATO submerges us with foreign influence, foreign infiltrators, foreign power. Worst of all, NATO's HQ is in Brussels, a city whose power over us we greatly fear & hate.

2) He wants to get rid of Trident, rightly, because it's a waste of money, which would be better spent on conventional armed forces that could actually be used to defend our Nation & Peoples, rather than just enriching American Jewish arms corporations. The British Army has traditionally supported unilateral nuclear disarmament, though the Navy support Trident.

3) Corbyn is a very virile man, capable of handling three beautiful women (including two feisty Latinas) treating them correctly as inferiors & handmaidens (which they are) and defeating Harriet Harman, Yvette Cooper, Liz Kendall and other uppity girls with ideas way above their station & beyond the limited capabilities of their gender. At the same time, Corbyn has to pay lip service to feminist egalitarianism because of his socialist "ideals", yet he is charismatic enough to attract hundreds of thousands of young females to support him. And he has three macho sons with Chilean heritage. His virile character would make him a suitable Party Leader.

4) On Grammar Schools, he would like to abolish selection, a policy which is anathema to nationalists, who believe in elitist education for the elite that every nation needs. He also wants to abolish charitable status for private schools, which might force the closure of some of the more petit bourgeois & politically correct ones.

On the other hand, private education is one of the few areas of excellence which England does among the best in the world.

Cynically political calculation leads to the observation that elite schools are educating the children of rich foreigners, rather than the poor English boys they were founded to teach and who still need them most. Grammar Schools help young members of the Occupation Forces (so called "immigrants") to get much better education than our native indigenous kids. In that sense they are not helping the national cause but rather making things worse.

5) On Infiltrators, (whom he terms "Refugees") his policy is utterly treasonable and cynically calculated to create yet more unemployment, homelessness and drive down wages to zero, while driving up housing costs to infinity by bringing here limitless numbers of foreign devils to exploit and undercut our people. Worse is better from his perspective, since alienated unemployed masses of workers & students might vote for him. But usually they abstain, in fact.

6) He is quite correct to demand the termination of foreign military adventures, which Whitehall has been obsessively pursuing for a thousand years, while refusing to use the military to genuinely defend our shores adequately against infiltration by his "migrant" friends & lovers.
7) And he is quite correct to criticise capitalist usury but totally fails to identify the real culprits within the north London Jewish community, amongst whom he lives & prospers. His gravely misguided policies on infiltration/immigration would enrich those guys greatly, which is presumably why the media they control are giving him so much oxygen of publicity. They tried & failed to put two of their own back into power, David & Ed Milliband. Now maybe they hope to use Corbymania to impoverish & proletarianise yet more yentls.

8) On the NHS (the Nazional Sozialist Death Service) he would like to waste yet more cash on that corrupt, uncaring & hugely inefficient behemoth, which employs a million foreigners & has murdered seven million of our own innocent babies (so far) in its abortion Holocaust and often ignores the needs of our people, thereby helping the Infiltration & Occupation Forces in their long-term aim of totally replacing our decadent English People. A process already far advanced in Corbyn's own constituency Islington North, after his 8 election wins there. And which he would doubtless like to extend nationwide.

9) He has succeeded in mobilising politically the current highly political generation of young, brainwashed products of State "Education" to his politically correct hobby horses. The Radical Right cannot access those disillusioned, alienated young masses, because the System denies Rightist thinkers access to the media & the education machine. Nevertheless, he is politicising these poor brainwashed fools. He will disillusion them inevitably, because the System will not allow him to satisfy their just demands. Nor can the Radical Right help them, despite our better analysis of their plight. Eventually they may turn to Nationalism, as students have in Scotland.

10) Corbyn has revived the old use of hustings & mass meetings in English politics, as used by David Lloyd George, Churchill & Gladstone. Nigel Farage missed his chance last year to appear as a demagogue, because he only held two successful mass meetings during the Euro Election Campaign. Corbyn has been energised by his ambitious Latina wives and stomped the whole country, raising Cain at scores of mass meetings! Fashion has changed & the young no longer watch telly politics. Nor read the Press. They want the excitement of mass meetings. Corbyn has spent fifty years at such meetings in Unions & Labour, so he has the experience needed to fulfill youth's expectations for excitement & entertainment.

11) Corbyn is a puritan who doesn't smoke or drink, setting a fine example by turning his back on those evil vices which have rotted our Nation for too long.

Third Communication


However, I did hold back a few even more extreme points about Corbyn to be on the "safe" side.

1) In particular, his controversial collaboration with Margarita Oppenheimer (alias Hodge) over the Islington child abuse scandal. That may yet be his Achilles heel.

2) his subservience to the big, foreign dominated Trade Unions, Unison, Unite & Fire Brigades Union (FBU).

3) the suspiciously Jewish forenames in his family: parents Naomi & David of EastEnder socialist background. Son Ben. His own names Jeremy (Hymie) & Ben again. A conspiracy theorist might guess that the Miliband Brith ( brothers) have simply been replaced with another, less obvious Hebrew. Just a guess.

4) his second wife Claudia Bracchitta, excellent mother of his three sons, though born in Chile, is of Sicilian origin & they are still close. That's not bad in itself but it probably inclines him to be pro European (despite his occasional Eurosceptic noises) as well as fanatically favourable to open borders immigration policy.




Jeremy Corbyn: Time for UK to cut free from US and Nato war policies

Corbyn has the potential to unite the Far Left and the Far Right, Muslims and Islamophobes as well as being the Labour leader to take the UK out of the EU, if he takes Ken Livingstone's advice and works with Nigel Farage.

The Left hate capitalistic imperialistic wars and the Right hate being a vassal state of the vassal state of Israel.

Let us hope he makes the most of his opportunity to make it into the history books.

Sunday, 24 August 2014

A test of the impartiality and the intellectual rigour of the King's Review

I have commented on the following essays on the King's Review:


  1. Why not say that unisex toilets are a manifestation of more and more men wanting to be women. Why, even UKIP is stuffed with them. Why do men want to become women?
    Is it cos they think men are lower than women?
    Or is it cos these trannies think becoming a woman is a way for them to get sex without having to pay for it?
    Anyway, feminism is not interested in empowering trannies, who are men trying to have a share of female power by becoming women and will always be regarded as interlopers by the ideologically-aware feminist.



THE KING'S REVIEW is an online magazine that brings together the best of academic expertise and current affairs journalism. Based in King's College, Cambridge, and inspired by the public contributions of fellow members such as John Maynard Keynes and Alan Turing, we continue the long tradition of a community positioned to respond to events that will not slow down to allow scholarly contemplation to catch up. We welcome submissions, whether as articles, blog posts, or suggested book reviews.
The ambition is big but the product is innovative: a magazine that blends the academic with the journalistic, tied to an institution that already has credibility, fame, and a long history of public engagement. Drawing on an international network of writers and thinkers, we will provide broad and timely coverage of important world issues while maintaining the rigour of a peer-reviewed journal.

PEER REVIEW

There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too self-serving, no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print.


Do you think my comments will be displayed, eventually?

I have offered to contribute to their magazine. Do you think I will receive a response?

I think we already know that the overwhelming number of modern graduates have been well and truly brainwashed and indoctrinated. Even if they don't believe, they have to pretend they believe in the official orthodoxy, or they will be marked down by their usually female feminist PC liberal lecturers.  

Monday, 21 October 2013

How to solve the problem of the Japanese not having sex, not marrying and not having children

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/20/young-people-japan-stopped-having-sex
Why have young people in Japan stopped having sex?
What happens to a country when its young people stop having sex? Japan is finding out… Abigail Haworth investigates


Japan's under-40s won't go forth and multiply out of duty, as postwar generations did. The country is undergoing major social transition after 20 years of economic stagnation. It is also battling against the effects on its already nuclear-destruction-scarred psyche of 2011's earthquake, tsunami and radioactive meltdown. There is no going back. "Both men and women say to me they don't see the point of love. They don't believe it can lead anywhere," says Aoyama. "Relationships have become too hard."

Marriage has become a minefield of unattractive choices. Japanese men have become less career-driven, and less solvent, as lifetime job security has waned. Japanese women have become more independent and ambitious. Yet conservative attitudes in the home and workplace persist. Japan's punishing corporate world makes it almost impossible for women to combine a career and family, while children are unaffordable unless both parents work. Cohabiting or unmarried parenthood is still unusual, dogged by bureaucratic disapproval.

The price of sex has become so impossibly high that Japanese men have decided that not only can they not afford it, they don't want it at all.  It is a major case of sour grapes.

Because Japanese women have become increasingly independent, Japanese beta males know they don't stand a chance at all of getting any sex or getting married, and have given up.  Unlike their British counter-parts, Japanese women are not sluts who give sex free to any jobless or low-waged loser like they are some sort of sex charity.  Beta males now have no chance at all of either getting laid or married.

http://www.japancrush.com/2013/stories/30-of-single-japanese-men-have-never-dated-a-woman.html

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/27/japan-grass-eaters-salaryman-macho 
Japan's 'grass eaters' turn their backs on macho ways
Yuki Sakurai and thousands like him have cast off the traditional image of the company salaryman

Some women, too, say they prefer their men rougher around the edges. A popular revival in interest in Japanese history has made unlikely pin-ups of feudal warlords from the distant past.

It is quite clear that Japanese women find the grass-eaters the opposite of sexy.  It is a vicious circle really.

As for the Chinese, they are also on a downward spiral.  The women are even fussier, knowing that there are 24 million "spare" Chinese men.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2465856/Chinas-lonely-hearts-The-millions-men-NEVER-love-countrys-child-policy.html 

There is however this strange phenomenon  of left over Chinese women.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/12/opinion/global/chinas-leftover-women.html?_r=0 

Recently, I heard on BBC Radio 4 a Chinese voice saying that there is a case for China importing immigrant labour because there are so many graduates in China who refuse to do manual work.

The problem is of course feminism.  It is not only a Western scourge, but a global one.

If this issue remains unaddressed, the fairer-skinned races will find themselves being outbred by the darker-skinned races who will be more numerous and have more masculine vitality.

For the Japanese, I recommend that they disenfranchise bachelors and ban the pill.

For the Chinese, I recommend that they end their one-child policy, particularly now that most Chinese couples say they only want one child now anyway.

For the West, I suggest that we women give men the respect they need to have in order to work better for us by repealing the Equality Act 2010 or its national equivalent and reintroduce fault into divorce.  These twin measures would have the effect of destroying the twin foundations of feminism and returning us all to sanity.


Thursday, 15 November 2012

Should Britain have a more Chinese style of government?

http://www.scmp.com/news/18th-party-congress/article/1083153/transcript-xi-jinpings-speech-unveiling-new-chinese

Is one-partyism and multi-partyism analogous to polytheism and monotheism?

Is not monotheism more advanced than polytheism?

What is the point of letting the stupid, parasitical, the immoral, irresponsible and venal vote?

No more than 10% of any populace deserve the vote IMHO.  If you give the rest the vote they will only vote for whoever bribes them most.

The long-term national interest is better served by directing our leaders to govern on the behalves of those who are not yet born than trusting to the tribal leaders of amoral political parties to ignore party interest in favour of the long-term national interest.

Let the revolution against the government for the parasitical sluts and their variously-fathered feral bastards begin now!  Let the rotten stinking carcass of demented feminism be buried! 

Saturday, 11 August 2012

How China and Russia could end Western hegemony once and for all on Monday 13 August

Dump the Dollar and the Euro ALL AT ONCE.  It is cheaper than war.   

I have really had enough of the disgraceful and disgusting foreign policy of the British government and their NATO partners in crime, who are the poodles of Israel.

What they are doing in Syria is beyond belief and beyond contempt.   Only insanity can be an excuse.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/10/britain-aid-syrian-opposition-groups

Britain to give £5m aid to Syrian opposition groups




002.190
YUSUFALI: Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors.
PICKTHAL: Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not hostilities. Lo! Allah loveth not aggressors.
SHAKIR: And fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you, and do not exceed the limits, surely Allah does not love those who exceed the limits.

022.039
YUSUFALI: To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;- and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid;-
PICKTHAL: Sanction is given unto those who fight because they have been wronged; and Allah is indeed Able to give them victory;
SHAKIR: Permission (to fight) is given to those upon whom war is made because they are oppressed, and most surely Allah is well able to assist them;

It can be seen that NATO is transgressing these verses.  In fact, they regularly transgress these verses, and recent examples are Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and now Syria.  Iran will be next.

How can it be moral to ruin people's lives, have them kill each other and then invade them ... for WHAT?  Just so they can isolate Iran so they can rob them of their oil?

Do our political classes even know why they are doing what they are doing and why they are doing it?  It certainly ain't for the Syrians.  It is that hypocritical claim which is so SICKENING.

Russia and China could easily put a stop to this when the markets open on Monday.   

Monday, 16 April 2012

China and the Tunisian imam learning Mandarin

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01g5yxs

A little girl in China was asked what she wanted to be when she grows up.  She said "An official. A corrupt official, because they have all the nice things."

This reminded me of this Tunisian imam I met in the Mandarin classes I used to attend, who said he was learning Mandarin so he could go there to convert the heathen Chinese.

His intonation was not very good so I can imagine the heathen Chinese giggling disrespectfully at him while he was explaining the virtues of the Holy Koran that will save their civilisation burning itself out in an orgy of consumerism and usury and SSMs, just like the West is doing now.

If this man succeeds, then the whole world really will become Muslim.

I wonder if there are many such Muslim missionaries like him.  China would be their biggest prize.  

First, Britain, then Israel and China, I think.  Secular Koranism is potentially global.  

Islam is not really so different from Ancient Chinese culture and treats women rather better than the ancient Chinese patriarchs used to treat their concubines.   Concubines would have to be converted into wives with equal legal status.   

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

A tragic waste of a veto by China and Russia

Now Libyan oil will be carved up between the Western powers while China and Russia moan and whinge on the sidelines.

Loss of nerve or just not paying attention?

They might have got the oil contracts from a grateful and rescued Gaddafi, but no.  They hesitated and the opportunity was lost.  They could have done something and emerged out of this with greater credibility and national prestige enhanced, but they chose to watch a bunch of thugs kick the shit of some Arab-African fucker with a bit of oil and walk on by, shaking their heads when all they needed to do was raise their voice and shake a stick at them.

China not a sleeping dragon but a dwarf python too engorged with food to move. Russian bear in hibernation and snoring fitfully


Wednesday, 24 November 2010

China has a benevolent dictatorship, we have a malign oligarchy.

“A benevolent dictatorship has one advantage; it can get things done. When China decided to build monopoly in rare earths, it goes about it without opposition or debate. In the US democracy, it's almost impossible to choose a course for the nation. Every idea, every strategy is debated and opposed by one or both political parties. As a result, in national emergencies the US responds only slowly. China has the advantage of being able to hire the best minds in the West and then apply their experience and know-how to China's growing store of knowledge. The Chinese population has a fierce work ethic. The people of the West (particularly in Europe) have a ‘vacation ethic’ and a ‘government will take care of me’ psychology that is rendering them less competitive. China is patient, and thinks in terms of the future. As a result, China is running around the world buying up reserves in raw materials and staking out claims for agricultural land and mining sites where ever they can find them. In contrast, the US is building up ’impossible’ debts and in doing so mortgaging its future.” - Richard Russell, Dow Theory Letters, 11-22-10

Time to dump the dollar, folks

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2010-11/24/content_11600496.htm

Russia and China could both short the dollar and destroy America.  It is actually ridiculously easy to do.  It is probably worth taking the losses such a move would entail to bring America to its knees.  Cheaper and quicker than war, with fewer casualties. 

Sunday, 10 October 2010

Democracy, Onepartyism and Electoral Reform

We live in an elective oligarchy, not a democracy.

An oligarchy is a political oligopoly, or cartel, if you prefer.

A cartel is a conspiracy of providers who have mutually agreed to carve up a market between themselves and will do all in their power to keep out any competition.

Democracy in the old-fashioned sense was Athenian Democracy and this took the form of citizens being allowed to vote on policies and laws as individuals.

A modern form of this would be government by referenda, which of course we do not have. In fact, the British are the worst-treated nation of all the EU nations since most of them have already had a referendum on Maastricht and the Lisbon Treaty, while the British were denied a referendum on either.

Clearly, for direct democracy to operate, the exercise of voting for parties would become redundant.

Clearly, too, the form of democracy that operated in Ancient Athens and Republican Rome was without party, because the citizens of Rome would vote for or against laws. (Shifting factions are of course unavoidable.)

In a modern state however, a party would be necessary, if only to count votes, field candidates, propose policies etc.

But to even propose this raises the spectre of a one-party state and all the horrors that our knowledge of Hitler, Stalin and Mao will bring to mind.

The only flourishing and functioning one-party state is of course China. The continually revised constitution of the Chinese Communist Party reveals that they have got the theory right at any rate, and there are articles in it that are there to safeguard the rights of individual members against the leader and his cronies.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-10/25/content_6944738_1.htm Article 4

China is, ironically and paradoxically, the only country that is practising direct democracy, albeit with a very narrow franchise.

Perhaps the reason why it is now doing so well is because the system now practised in China is the most rational of all known forms of government. All the best people join it, the rewards are enticing, and there will be no problems with succession under their finely balanced constitution. The leader is elected by the Politburo (consisting of 9 members). The Politburo is in turn elected by the Politburo Standing Committee (consisting of 27 members) and also elects members to the Politburo Standing Committee.

If their current leader falls under a bus, there will be at least 9 people waiting in the wings with the experience and the talent to replace him, unlike our sad sorry system we like to pretend is a democracy.


Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...