THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label International Marxism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label International Marxism. Show all posts
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
International Marxism, National Socialism and The Third Way
National Socialism was an ideology to combat International Marxism, which has world ambitions.
National Socialism attempted to be a - ahem - Third Way, ie a middle way between capitalism and socialism.
Does any of this sound familiar?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/may/08/leaders.labour
Islam is another example of a third way ideology between the ethno-exclusiveness and high entry requirements of Judaism and the extremist ideology of the Christians which claimed that all one had to do to reach the Kingdom of God is believe that Christ is really God, amongst other odd and extremist doctrines.
There are many examples in history of hybrid and evolving ideologies.
Thursday, 26 August 2010
International Marxism, National Socialism and "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" AKA Pragmatic Nationalism
Now on the second volume of Mein Kampf, it is quite clear that, whatever you think of Hitler and his incoherent racial theories, he cared deeply about social justice and wanted to improve the lot of the poor.
It should be noted that the party that he joined was the Labour Party, which he very successfully moulded to take the form of his particular ideology.
National Socialism was therefore the anti-thesis of International Marxism because National Socialists wanted socialism for their own country, but rejected World Communism, which was a feature of International Marxism.
Trotsky clung to Marx's purist goal of World Communism until Stalin decisively saw to it that the Russians concentrated only on Russia Empire. Mao was only interested in the Socialism for China and not any other peoples who did not come under the rule of China.
It could therefore be said that any form of Socialism that had no international ambitions is in fact National Socialism.
The Russians can be said to have given up on their National Socialism the moment Gorbachev abandoned their one-party system - which is the distinguishing feature of National Socialism.
It can therefore be said that the Chinese remain the only living flourishing practitioners of National Socialism (with Chinese characteristics), which is a very interesting thought indeed.
National Socialism appears to have served the Chinese rather well. They have certainly made a point of not being obviously aggressive and expansionist. "One country two systems" demonstrates that they are capable of compromising when the need arises. Since China is undoubtedly an empire, they are very keen emphasising racial harmony, very understandably.
What a shame Hitler is not alive today. It would be delicious to be able to put the point to him on The Today Programme, perhaps, that his National Socialism is perhaps being implemented better by the Chinese than by the Germans, and whether he still stands by all the nonsense that was his racial theory.
He did after all say:
It would be delicious to be able to call the Singaporeans Nazis too, but it appears they only have a de facto one-party state, not a de jure one. Shame.
It should be noted that the party that he joined was the Labour Party, which he very successfully moulded to take the form of his particular ideology.
National Socialism was therefore the anti-thesis of International Marxism because National Socialists wanted socialism for their own country, but rejected World Communism, which was a feature of International Marxism.
Trotsky clung to Marx's purist goal of World Communism until Stalin decisively saw to it that the Russians concentrated only on Russia Empire. Mao was only interested in the Socialism for China and not any other peoples who did not come under the rule of China.
It could therefore be said that any form of Socialism that had no international ambitions is in fact National Socialism.
The Russians can be said to have given up on their National Socialism the moment Gorbachev abandoned their one-party system - which is the distinguishing feature of National Socialism.
It can therefore be said that the Chinese remain the only living flourishing practitioners of National Socialism (with Chinese characteristics), which is a very interesting thought indeed.
National Socialism appears to have served the Chinese rather well. They have certainly made a point of not being obviously aggressive and expansionist. "One country two systems" demonstrates that they are capable of compromising when the need arises. Since China is undoubtedly an empire, they are very keen emphasising racial harmony, very understandably.
What a shame Hitler is not alive today. It would be delicious to be able to put the point to him on The Today Programme, perhaps, that his National Socialism is perhaps being implemented better by the Chinese than by the Germans, and whether he still stands by all the nonsense that was his racial theory.
He did after all say:
"Believe me, National Socialism would not be worth anything if it were to be confined to Germany and did not secure the rule of the superior race over the whole world for at least one or two thousand years."
It would be delicious to be able to call the Singaporeans Nazis too, but it appears they only have a de facto one-party state, not a de jure one. Shame.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
I have solved the problem of evil
1:00 Theodicy 2:00 We were never promised a rose garden. 3:00 The Torah is the Word of God. Isaiah 45:7 4:00 God created evil. 5:00 The...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month...
-
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...


