Comparative religion, Andrew Yang , Greg Johnson and UBI

I join from 2:49:00

• idolatry
• alleged divinity of Christ
• hero worship of Muhammad
• Jews regard their prophets as morally flawed humans
• the sin of Moses https://www.ou.org/torah/parsha/rabbi-sacks-on-parsha/covenant_and_conversation_land/
• the sin of David http://rabbisacks.org/faith-god-bereishit-5778/
• the N J Dawood Penguin translation of The Koran by an Iraqi Jew
• The Koran supports a one party state http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=6&verse=159
• The Koranic flat rate income tax of 20%  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
• usury finances imperial wars
• Universal Basic Income
• the difference between having something as a right and being the recipient of charity
• Why White Nationalists Like Andrew Yang by Greg Johnson  https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/03/why-white-nationalists-like-andrew-yang/
• As technology renders jobs obsolete, what will keep us busy? Sapiens author Yuval Noah Harari examines ‘the useless class’ and a new quest for purpose  Greg Johnson and I talk about sex and his latest book
• Loss of skills
• We will regress into a pre-marriage state of civilisation if we break God's laws? God's punishment for disobedience  https://www.broadcaster.org.uk/section2/transcript/moseswarnings.htm
• Loss of skills
• When men of other races and nations know you are afraid of your immoral women, they will take it as a signal to invade and expolit
• According to Marx, religion was the opium of the people before. Now recreational extramarital sex is their opium in our increasingly oppressive matriarchy. Liberalism is now sexual liberation. 
• And then the stream was ended by someone who entered the hangout and ejected all of us, obviously having taken a dislike to what I was saying. 

The Temptation of Eve and why men must always pay for sex

I deplore this attempt to blame women for all the ills of mankind and will address it now, once and for all.

If men now blame all their problems on women, they should also remember that most of their pleasures also come from women.

The Chinese word for GOOD consists of the an amalgam of the word FEMALE and CHILD. I only wish I could have been there when Chinese scholars were debating how to represent the concept of GOOD with which words.

http://dictionary.hantrainerpro.com/chinese-english/translation-hao_good.htm

Now that this was the compound word arrived at, one must logically ask if this hypothetical Chinese female would be a slut or this hypothetical Chinese child a bastard. NO, is my answer. If most of your women are sluts and most of your children bastards, then it means the men have lost control, and this is BAD and you should be doing something about this, if there are any moral men left in your society.

Women are indeed temptation for men, but imagine a world in which there are no temptations you could be tempted by. In that case you might as well be dead, or a Buddhist.

Love them or hate them, you can't live without them. By this I mean whether you are a man or woman and hate the opposite sex, you must know that your civilisation cannot continue without the opposite sex.

If the military without women is the exemplar of a hierarchical patriarchy, then the bee colony is the exemplar of an apparently egalitarian matriarchy.

If you asked a wise Chinese person such as myself what feminism represents, I would say it represents the eternal temptation of heterosexual men: fornication. You will not be able to find a single feminist who supports slut-shaming because the secret agenda of feminism is to empower sluts who become the mothers of bastards.

Yin and Yang came from the Ancient Chinese asserting the rather Newtonian principle that every action causes a reaction, and this represents the eternal battle of the sexes.

The sad fact is that sex must never be free for Man because, if it ever did, his civilisation would decline and fall. He must always pay for sex, and this is why the prostitute should always be treated as above the fornicating slut in any rational and well-ordered patriarchy.

There is a reason why our matriarchy have more or less criminalised prostitution: because feminist sluts want to retain their stranglehold monopoly on the supply of extramarital sex to heterosexual men. This is how the matriarchy bribes men who could become fathers of legitimate children into accepting the oppression of the matriarchy.

Marx once said religion is the opium of the people in a patriarchy.

In a matriarchy, fornication is the opium of the people.

We are a matriarchy hooked on fornication.

All it takes is any group, however barbaric, to practise the rules of marriage better than we do, and it will be the end of our civilisation.

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=8&verse=65
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=8&verse=66
 

Is Claire Khaw a latter day John Snow (the doctor who proved that cholera was a water-borne disease)?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1854_Broad_Street_cholera_outbreak

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Snow_(physician)

http://www.brompton-cemetery.org/

After so many taunts that I am a failure, I was last night suddenly heartened by the name of a man I could not remember.

Earlier this year a kind friend took me on a Karl Marx London tour http://www.marxwalks.com/ and we walked past the John Snow public house and the Broadwick Street pump.

Having looked him up this morning I discovered it was John Snow, the physician who eventually convinced the relevant authorities that cholera was caused by contaminated water, not by miasma.

There were of course plenty of vested interests and entrenched attitudes that he had to overcome before his view was accepted, but accepted it was, finally, just as what I say about SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379 being the cancer of any society will one day be accepted and something done about it, hopefully before I pop my clogs.

The other thing that struck me about Karl Marx was what a terrible husband he was and how little he earned.  His long suffering wife stood by him though.  If there had been no fault divorce then, it is almost certain that Marx would never have written the Communist Manifesto or Das Kapital, or indeed even got so far as to have enough to allow Frederich Engels to make a book out of his rambling notes, because she would have left him in the lurch and he would have been a broken man.  Lefties apt to sneer at marriage and wanting to turn it into sex toy for gay couples should reflect upon the importance of this institution.

One of these Sundays I will pop down to Brompton Cemetery to lay flowers at his grave.  The poor man died of a stroke at 45, and was never married.

Islam more advanced than liberalism

Do liberals have an agreed book of liberalism?  No.  Even the Marxists have the Communist Manifesto and an agreed set of principles.

Even the National Socialists had Mein Kampf.

Did you know that the Roman plebeians asked for their laws to be carved in stone in the forum so that they would know their rights, and this was indeed done?


Islam is the only religion that frankly admits that the difference between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference.

An objectionable law is an objectionable law, whether it is passed by a government that calls itself liberal or whether it calls itself a theocracy.

It seems obvious that  we should examine any law we find objectionable on the grounds of rationality v irrationality, good v evil, practicability v its opposite.

This obvious solution is for some reason rocket science to liberals (who have stupidity, intransigence, ignorance and arrogance bred into them after decades of being indoctrinated by decades of "progressive" education) who quake in terror at the thought of a theocracy or a one-party state.  They are the ones who cry most hysterically "four legs good! two legs bad!" apparently oblivious to the fact that the political cartel - the political oligarchy that rules them have long since emptied the contents of the bottles with labels saying "Liberalism", "Conservatism" and "Socialism", homogenised them and poured them back into their respective bottles.

Only the most wilfully blind cannot and will not see this.

Feminism - an unnatural mutation of liberalism and a manifestation of the liberal death wish - is now the ruling ideology.  Notice how no one at all dares to challenge feminism, except the Muslims.  In Britain, you can lose your job if you say anything at work that a woman might find offensive as Andy Graham and Richard Keys found to their cost.  You would have thought that some men might object, but it is the white liberal middle classes journalists who are too afraid to point this out, so feminised are they now.

The only way feminism can be sustained is through enormous state intervention (through the existence of totalitarian liberal anti-discrimination laws) and welfare support (sluts, slags and slappers are given child benefit at taxpayers' expense for breeding bastards).

Does liberalism have an authoritative handbook or a set of rules?  No, they make it up as they go along.

Does Islam?  Yes, even though the Muslims have difficulties interpreting it properly, but I can help sort them out.

res ipsa loquitur.  

International Marxism, National Socialism and The Third Way

National Socialism was an ideology to combat International Marxism, which has world ambitions.

National Socialism attempted to be a - ahem - Third Way, ie a middle way between capitalism and socialism.

Does any of this sound familiar?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2005/may/08/leaders.labour

Islam is another example of a third way ideology between the ethno-exclusiveness and high entry requirements of Judaism and the extremist ideology of the Christians which claimed that all one had to do to reach the Kingdom of God is believe that Christ is really God, amongst other odd and extremist doctrines.  

There are many examples in history of hybrid and evolving ideologies.