THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
If a man does not have a supportive wife, any endeavour he undertakes would fail. Low status males who transgress against the culture don't get supportive wives . If they started supportive, they might turn bad after they notice that their husband is a compulsive womaniser. Maybe she decided to cash her chips in while she still had them, or, she wanted to make public that she did not want anything to do with him again so she could move on to a better man now.
Why would she support him if she doesn't think he is going to win? The best way to draw a line under her association with Spencer is to stab him in the front in the most public way possible.
It is not safe for men to marry until no fault divorce is abolished.
In the UK the men's rights party is led by a repulsive beta male loser called Mike Buchanan. Instead of proposing the abolition of no fault divorce, he is expending his energy and time hopelessly on campaigning to ban circumcision as an expression of unexpressed antisemitism and Islamophobia. That is how hopeless white men are these days. No wonder their women hate them and make ever more outrageous demands on them in the hope of shaming and angering them enough to take back control. The penny has not yet dropped though.
36:00 A cackle of misogynistic male laughter at a sane old wife being incarcerated in an asylum when her husband wanted to marry a younger woman. When divorce is not practicable, murder and other measures are resorted to.
40:00 Great point by Brundlefly about neither Johnson nor Spencer being prepared to do the grunt work of being nice to the proles. Hitler did not disdain to take an interest in his proles. I have done it all though. Hint, hint.
This is how I see it: if you want to get to ethno-nationalism, you have to go past civic nationalism. If you are in Idaho and want to get to the Pacific Ocean, you have to go past Oregon. I can take you guys to to Oregon where I think you will all be happy enough, but if you want to go to the beach, you will have to make your own way there.
You cannot do any of the stuff you want to do because you cannot behave well towards each other because you are weak, low status and immoral men. People will look at you scornfully and think to themselves "Such men deserve to suffer." This means you will only have bad leaders and treacherous followers, and nothing will be achieved.
50:00 On the new superchat rules, it appears that the walls are closing in and you really need to talk about restoring the patriarchy and shaming sluts with quran.com/24/2 because you might as well tackle the problem at its source: feminism. If they start banning that, we can get the Muslims to declare jihad and take overAHAHAHAHA
53:00 Muslims call themselves Sufis to show they are the peaceful kind of Muslim because you are meant to think they have no time for radicalism, extremism and terrorism because they are chanting most of the day.
1:07:00 The only way of getting your white ethnostate remains to get your political classes to see things your way and the only way to do that is be organised and not appear like lower class losers repulsive to women and find yourself a high status leader. But what high status male with anything to lose would want to be associated with you lot? If they wanted gardeners etc would they hire any of you? No, of course not. Oswald Mosley was an aristocratic leader, but the political establishment ganged up against him. Still, you have Trump who is really one in a billion.
1:19:00 Jews have a moral code, alt-right losers don't even know what that means. Jews also have a better genetic quality because Jews care about whom they marry, while alt-right losers are mostly illegitimate, singly parented and never knew their fathers. Jews are excellent at abstract reasoning ie deduction and morality, alt-right antisemites only know their base appetites and violent inclinations and have no self-awareness, no culture, no religion, no family, no God, no wife and no legitimate offspring who will be a credit to them. This means they are incapable of planning for the future or of sustained and focused organised action. Their women instinctively know this and this is why they are repulsive even to women of their own race and class.
58:00 "Some of sort a Christian identity" - but how will its morality be imposed other than through the law? To be Christian is to believe in the Trinity. If you don't really believe Christ is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God, you are not really Christian. The Inquisition was about ensuring this was properly understood by the forced converts. People wouldn't put up with this now and the Catholic Church lost its power centuries ago. Even if you could do it, is it worth forcing forced converts into church every Sunday? You wouldn't have the manpower to do it. In the end, all you can do is demand compliance with patriarchy restoring sharia and punish those who break those laws.
James Fountain
I know that Greg Johnson favors laws against no fault divorce and enforcement of laws against adultery and alienation of affection. It's a bit dismaying that so few self styled leaders and opinion makers on the dissident right have anything to say about such matters. Maybe there is a lot of conscious avoidance of the Tradcon label.
Claire Khaw
It is probably because most Western men have been deprived of their fathers by their mothers and you can't miss what you never had. Even if you believed in marriage etc, you might be wary of talking about it too much in case you annoy men whom you know who have no hope of marrying or who never knew their fathers. Embarrassment and fear of giving offence would be the reasons. I did go on about it when I was in the BNP until someone gave me a prod and said "We are mostly like that"!
After so many years of saying the same thing in different ways and proposing a one party theocracy, I trust people now get how bad the situation is iie that nothing short of my proposal would solve the problem.
The sad thing is that they are now retreating into the position of pretending that the problem has been solved, because Trump will make everything right again. Or, that after they conduct their pogrom, they will impose white sharia on their women , but in the meantime they will continue to enjoy the sexual liberation they have been enjoying ....
2:18:00 Doooovid: Israeli Jews find the Left more of a threat than the Right.
2:40:00 Kevin Grace affirms this.
3:09:00 Kevin Grace:
Trump is the last hope for civic nationalism in the United States. If he is brought down, all bets are off, because what follows him will be much stronger and much nastier.
This truly distatesful request for donations is about banning male circumcision and an expression of antisemitism and Islamophobia being championed by an unmarried mother who is campaigning against feminism but who won't support the restoration of the patriarchy. The man who runs the show for anti-feminism in the UK, Mike Buchanan, is too cowardly to discuss abolishing no fault divorce with me.
If he were prepared to discuss such matters with me, he would have been told in no uncertain terms that Jewish and Muslim men and women who believe in their marriage vows
1) have better gender relations and therefore tend to marry each other more
2) are more likely to stay together as a married couple for the sake of their children
3) tend to bring up better quality children than the non-Muslim gentile post-Christian who is more likely to be brought up fatherless, using the feminine stratagems of his unmarried mother to get his way in our culture of entitlement and excuses, under-achieving and less unemployable than those who were brought up by both their parents living together in regular contact with their extended family.
Presumably, this inability to compete against Jews and Muslims is the reason why they are so bent on making Jews and Muslims feel unwelcome in this country with the unstated and ultimate aim of expelling them.
Nationalists who have a problem with immigration, particularly with Muslim immigration, should note that the only reason why the West is being flooded with immigrants is because feminism has taken hold and destroyed gender relations, the practice of marriage as well as the human stock of the next generation by normalising bastardy and single motherhood.
It is laughable that such people claim to represent any sort of campaign against feminism.
There will be no nationalism without patriarchy, because only patriarchy would produce enough good strong men capable of facing the truth and defending the national interest. There is no one in the establishment and anti-establishment parties that has any hope of leading any movement against feminism, because they are moral and political pygmies too afraid of speaking truth to power because they are afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence or even have a dialogue with me on these matters.
The dysgenic feminist State won't go away quietly and will only go when it is overthrown by men, not by women whose legs you like to film and slavishly agree with who need to go on courses. If Elizabeth Hobson were a man, would she get any kind of a job as Director of Communications? The fact that she is "resident anti-feminist on Radio Kent" says how harmless she is. Unmarried mothers are hardly going to call for the patriarchy to be restored and the only way to do that now in our "advanced" matriarchy is with Quran.com/24/2 Elizabeth won't be agreeing to be interviewed by me, will she?
It is interesting that when Elizabeth couldn't be interviewed by Piers Morgan and Mike Buchanan said he was prepared to stand in for her, he was refused. A dysgenic feminist state prefers the young to the old, the female to the male, the inarticulate to the articulate, the irrelevant to the relevant, all because she has good legs. Anti-feminism won't be taken seriously until and unless alpha male leaders take charge and stop hiding behind women. Mike Buchanan was born beta and will always be perceived as beta by women and men.
INSTEAD OF CALLING FOR THE ABOLITION OF NO FAULT DIVORCE, THESE ANTI-FEMINISTS WANT TO BAN MALE CIRCUMCISION AS A DOG WHISTLE TO ANTI-IMMIGRATION AND UNEMPLOYABLE ISLAMOPHOBIC AND ANTISEMITIC BETA MALES OUR DYSGENIC FEMINIST STATE HAS CREATED AND MARGINALISED
So what are the solutions she advocates? Banning male circumcision in an egregious display of antisemitism and Islamophobia? Does she even call for the restoration of the patriarchy?
Many people see these protestations are just a cover. That matriarchal Iceland is seeking to ban circumcision is a clear implicit display of hostility towards Jews and Muslims. Deny it all you like, but you will never be able to disprove that impression.
The term for circumcision in Hebrew – brit mila – “a covenant by circumcision”– emphasises that it is this covenant which created the Jews a nation, by Abraham’s acceptance of circumcision on behalf of his yet-unborn descendants. Even non-observant Jews who do not take the biblical story seriously, accept that for Jews, for at least two millennia, circumcision was the one indispensable commandment that makes one a Jew – not living in the Jewish homeland, obeying other commandments, or anything else.
To ban circumcision, to ban joining the covenant, the rabbinical court and many Jews fear, would be (however unintentionally) to ban Jewish national identity itself.
Iceland male circumcision ban: MP behind plan 'didn’t think it was necessary to consult' Jewish and Muslim groups, amid growing anger 'I don’t see it as a religious matter,' insists Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir, a female MP. The matriarchy of Iceland understandably feel threatened by the patriarchal moral values Judaism and Islam represent.
By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.
It is so obvious that gentile non-Muslims cannot compete against Jews and Muslim immigrants in their own homelands. This pointless show of implicit antisemitism and Islamophobia will get you nowhere. In fact, it is just a waste of time and energy and is indeed a form of displacement activity. If you are against feminism, restore the patriarchy. Since Elizabeth Hobson is herself an unmarried mother, it would be like expecting turkeys to vote for Christmas.
SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY FEMINISM
Has Elizabeth Hobson articulated any solutions to the problems caused by feminism? I hope someone will attempt to answer this question if she and Mike Buchanan do not.
GENUINE LEADERSHIP AND MORAL AUTHORITY IS REQUIRED FOR RESTORING THE PATRIARCHY
You will never be able to successfully challenge feminism without restoring the patriarchy. How sad that the men who wish to challenge feminism are no longer even capable of conceiving of the idea of restoring the patriarchy.
The only way to restore the patriarchy is of course to reconsecrate marriage.
Marriage cannot be reconsecrated by a Directrix of Communications who is herself an unashamed unmarried mother who cannot see the point of marriage, can it?
Or by a leader who refuses to talk about supporting marriage - the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy.
The reason why you dare not talk about restoring the patriarchy is because you already know that men who already have been the victims of feminism - including Mike Buchanan himself - are in fact unmarriageable. The more you continue to hide behind women who do not respect marriage, the more morally compromised you become and the less moral authority you will have.
Leadership is everything about moral authority, but the concept seems to be entirely lost amongst male political activists.
It is time for feminism to fulfill its promise of equality, and to
quit making a mockery of it.
It is surely time to give up any such expectation of feminism, denounce
it, declare war on it and defeat it.
The asinine Elam also obsesses about the marginal pursuit of banning
male circumcision presumably as a subconscious expression of his
antisemitism and Islamophobia. It is as if he wants to fail. Oh, and he
has blocked me on Twitter. It is impossible to tell if these men's rights activists are really that stupid or are just pretending to be.
The tragedy is that both Elam and Buchanan are clearly beta male mediocrities, repulsive to women and not husband material.
Where are the alpha males, you ask? They have better things to do than save beta males from the stench of their own mediocrity and character defects. These men with alpha male qualities prefer to enjoy the privilege of sexual access to women which they can do only if they conform to the rules of our stinking degenerate matriarchy the most important of which is to never ever criticise the morals of Slut Single Mothers. The 4 Categories of Unmarried Motherhood
The default behaviour of women in a matriarchy free from the constraints of patriarchy is unchecked parasitism.
Isn't it a truth universally acknowledged that a man wants a sex object and a woman a meal ticket? If marriage is no longer sacred then there will be no possibility of affection and trust between a man and a woman. The solution must be to abolish no fault divorce. Why can't you say that, John AKA @MGTOWisFREEDOM?
The first one from left is the anodyne Robert Brockway. From the 42nd minute, he says:
Most of my life I have considered myself left-wing. When I was younger, I probably would have called myself a socialist. The reality is that I will not call myself left now because the left moved somewhere that I didn't recognise. So I suppose you could call me centrist now. The men's right movement is absolutely not a Conservative or right-wing organisation. We are about to form the Australian men's right movement. The objects of this organisation is the rejection of the enforcement of traditional gender roles.
Are they proposing to do any of the following?
Abolish no fault divorce
Abolish all totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation including equal pay legislation?
Bottom line is women only put up with men because they think they will be better off if they stay.
Once they have an independent income they don't see why they should put with any boredom or irritation.
Which is why the economy should be deliberately rigged in favour of men to make most women stay after the glow of romance and love has gone.
Which is why you have to say you will repeal all anti-discrimination legislation on principle.
And this includes Equal Pay legislation.
If you dare not say this, you are obviously a beta male cuck afraid of attracting the attention and wrath of the feminazis and are obviously not man enough to withstand their attack which you anticipate.
Most women are basically amoral and unprincipled. They will side with the winner. Do you think these men could ever become alpha male winners? Of course not. When hell freezes over or when Muslims take over, maybe.
From 1:11 How women manipulate men into committing acts of violence to keep the status quo, especially unmarried mothers with fatherless sons who sic their illegitimate sons to attack men and women who question the welfare state, eg throwing urine on Lauren Southern.
From 1:20 Why women will always favour who they think will win in the end. (It ain't beta male cucks like Robert Brockway or Mike Buchanan.)
The second one is a Canadian woman with sons who looks like a lesbian. She always wears the same disgusting top on her scrawny shoulders and looks uglier and every time I see her. I ain't saying I am an oil painting, but why does she think she is? Her male or female sex partner if she has one still has not got round to telling her never to wear that fucking shitting pissing ugly top ever again.
The third is Augusto Zimermann. He is guilty of being Italian-speaking but not that sexy even if he makes the right noises about free speech.
Fourth is Mike Buchanan who took the opportunity of saying he wanted to ban male circumcision as a symptom of unexpressed antisemitism and Islamophobia rather than propose the abolition of no fault divorce. He represents perfectly what feminists hate and fear about living in an environment of traditional marriage where most women are expected to marry. Imagine having such a lack of options that you feel you have to marry Mike Buchanan and bear his babies. This is precisely what makes feminists shudder with disgust and loathing and contemplate suicide, working in a brothel or remaining a spinster or, being one of the wives of an alpha male Muslim entitled to have four wives. If anyone's interested, I myself would opt for polygamy believing that a share of an alpha is better than having a whole beta male to oneself. I have said been saying for ages that even I would be a better leader for anti-feminism than a beta male cuck like Buchanan wittering on about banning male circumcision to complete his vulnerabilities ie of being Islamophobic and antisemitic as well as being sexist.
Over the years, this turd-brain refuses to engage with me at all probably because he thinks I am Muslim. He is therefore a coward, hypocrite as well as an Islamophobe and an antisemite.
Being a hypocrite, he tells keyboard warriors to engage with the real world while refusing to engage with me because he doesn't want to discuss abolishing no fault divorce, hardly an extremist proposal, if you wanted to make marriage a better bargain for men.
Finally, there is Bettina Arndt. She made money when she was endorsing sexual liberation that led to Western degeneracy and now she is making sympathetic noises about men who as a result of sexual liberation became the beta male victims of feminism. She is still the best speaker though.
Brockway and Buchanan then claim men's rights issues are not "right-wing" at all. I would contend that they are because when you get down to the nitty gritty, the problem is matriarchy. If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution must be patriarchy. If the solution is patriarchy, then marriage must be practised to turn your society into a patriarchy again after you have overthrown the stinking degenerate matriarchy that has turned men into women of the worst kind (ie stupid and promiscuous) women into men of the worst kind (ie stupid and violent).
Here is the problem:
Feminism causes matriarchy.
Matriarchy is a society in which most of the sex that takes places is extramarital sex.
We know this because most babies born in the West are illegitimate and sluts are worshiped by men and given a status above men.
You must have noticed that Western government governs by prioritising the female preference and marginalising and demonising the male preference.
Marriage is indispensable to patriarchy, but patriarchy cannot exist if most members of society are not practising marriage and having illegitimate children.
Feminism has undermined marriage. Feminists always had the declared intention of undermining the patriarchy anyway.
Feminism works by bribing and distracting men with premarital sex until they are now so hooked on the idea of getting sex outside marriage that any suggestion of returning to patriarchy through the practice of traditional marriage and slut-shaming will induce catatonic shock or a shit fit.
So now we know what we have lost by the progressive desecration of the institution of marriage and the regressive practice of spreading sexual liberation. Remember, senior female MPs of the Labour Party were keen to explore and extend the boundaries of sexual liberation. We must never forget that sluts and socialism march hand in hand and that both sluts and socialists have a tendency to want a nanny state to look after them and be generous with taxpayers' money. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html
Recognising the situation as hopeless and the political system as incapable of preventing the feminazis from taking over every aspect of national life, Muslim radicals like Anjem Choudary have proposed an Islamic State governed by a Caliph, presumably after an Iranian-style revolution.
But surely this cannot be more unrealistic than nursing the forlorn hope that these tossers and losers who represent anti-feminism will one day turn into alpha male leaders and overthrow the matriarchy?
These men are such sad sacks and charisma-free zones that they provoke in men and women the instinctive and visceral emotions of contempt and disgust, making us feel that they do not deserve to have legitimate children because they are so obviously unmarriageable and are therefore no good to man nor beast. You also feel that the only people who would care about men like these are their mothers, who should be ashamed of themselves for producing such unmarriageable sons in the first place.
For anti-feminism to succeed in overthrowing the stinking degenerate matriarchy, there must be an alpha male leader. Clearly, senior men with status and anything to lose don't want to be associated with these pariah beta male victims of feminism and won't come riding to their rescue. The cancer of feminism has already spread all the way to the top. The West now has brain cancer and motor neurone disease, to draw a morbid analogy.
In Rome there were two paths to power, but only aristocrats became senators. The two paths to power were through being Optimates or Populares.
Why didn't the plebs represent themselves, you ask? Imagine the Untouchables of India representing themselves and complaining about being badly treated by the castes above them. Do you think think the higher Hindu castes would give a damn? Of course not. They would think it is just sick people complaining about being ill.
Even plebs despise plebs and cannot help being impressed by a potential leader to the manner born.
I would be happy to be caretaker leader until I have persuaded a suitable man with obvious leadership qualities to take over, but I know these beta male victims of feminism and their female minders shun men and dismiss me as an extremist because I have proposed a solution they dare not even admit to themselves must be the solution.
Even white nationalists who are have come out as anti-feminist and who recognise the need for moral values dare not admit the need for a religion that is capable of maintaining the morality of the nation. If they admit that Christianity is kaput, they do not quite dare discuss what should replace it, except this courageous and clever young man.
This means the problem of feminism will continue to get worse because they will not be discussed properly in MSM, let alone be addressed by the government. I am quite happy to be attacked by MSM but it seems MSM are reluctant even to attack me. Without an official role in any anti-feminist organisation, I am of course unable to claim the attention of MSM.
These anti-feminists are too afraid of controversy to even engage with me, because they are afraid of controversy, when it is of course controversy they should be wanting to attract on the basis that all publicity is good publicity.
The Liberty Belles, a female anti-feminist group, have decided they will not even formally challenge my ideas.
Why are they afraid of attracting controversy? Because they are being run by mediocre women. Yes, you heard right: even groups of men complaining about being the victims of feminism are being run by women! Not only are they proud of this, they refuse to contemplate doing it for themselves because once they do that, they will no longer be able to hide under the skirts of these women. They want women organising them and displaying themselves in their groups and even making money feeding off their suffering because they know that their conferences are slightly more fun with women around. I know it would have been unbearably depressing as a man attending a group like that if there were no women at all, only a bunch of beta males who are charisma-free zones, but it would have been perfect for the hardcore activist with leadership ambitions to seize power and become leader if there had been no women there. As it was, the presence of these women distracted them from getting down to business. But the awful truth of it is that they actually want to be distracted and the presence of women at their pathetic meetings raises their status.
These men would rather complain and campaign ineffectively than find themselves a real leader to lead them because they are basically afraid of being in a Lord of the Flies situation. These beta males victims of feminism who have had their stuffing knocked out of them already know they don't have the stomach for it.
Compare these beta male victims of feminism who cannot bear to even discuss the real cause of their oppression - the desecration of the institution of marriage since the welfare state was established - with Muslim terrorists and radicals prepared to give up their liberty and lives because they feel it is their religious duty to forbid evil and enjoin good, and you must be able to deduce who will be the eventual winner.
These losers are doing the equivalent of staging a theatrical performance without any rehearsals, let alone a dress rehearsal. Indeed, they are trying to do stage a theatrical performance without having learned their lines, without even the play having been written, without even a plot or characters. How pathetic. But they don't care and don't care to get what it is I am trying to say.
Men who are too afraid to speak for themselves and trust women to do so on their behalves deserve all they get.
But I am a woman too, people who know me will point out. Yes, I am a woman with alpha male qualities and prepared to take the initiative, like a man. The moment a suitable alpha male leader wants to take over from me, I shall gladly step aside. In the meantime, these beta male victims of feminism need to be shown how it is done.
What are the signs of being a suitable alpha male? A man with leadership qualities who also has a supportive wife. How likely are you going to find that in this day and age? At least I don't have a wife I am afraid of offending who will divorce me under the rules of no fault divorce and take half my stuff.
What do I want to happen next?
I know MSM won't want to give me the oxygen of publicity, and I know I cannot expect the pretty pretty female alt-right YouTubers who gabble and talk so fast to interview me, because I am competition even as they know they are easily sexier and younger than me.
As for other nationalists who already now dare to challenge feminism, they are not quite there yet about being ready to discuss what it is actually necessary to defeat it.
The great white hope in academia is Jordan Peterson, but he is stilling calling feminism postmodernism. The average person has not heard of it and if he has won't know what the hell it is, so he won't think it is a problem. Time to call a spade a spade, a slut a slut and postmodernism feminism if we are going to advance the debate to the next stage.
We have discovered what the problem is: feminism and matriarchy.
If the problem is matriarchy, the solution must be patriarchy.
Instead, the beta male victims of feminism want women to speak on their behalves and want women in their men's rights activism.
MY PLAN OF ACTION
To eradicate feminism first declare war on it.
I propose abolishing no fault divorce and repealing anti-discrimination legislation as well as the shaming of the immoral and promiscuous woman, especially if she has bastard offspring.
All I have to do at the moment is propose this to the beta male victims of feminism about to have their men's issues conference in Gold Coast, Australia in June 2017 and watch them throw up their hands in horror. When they reject this proposal, I mock them mercilessly until they cry for their mum, and then I will mock their mums.
International Conference on Men's Issues in June 2017
Beta Male leader of A Voice for Men , Paul Elam, who refuses to support marriage and has blocked me on Twitter
Roosh on the female vote and the Manchester suicide bomber
Ann Coulter: my favourite White Nationalist, saying she is prepared to give up her right to vote to save White America
British nationalists discuss white sharia, but with clear reservations about its implications. I am sure I can help them iron out any difficulties and misconceptions. From the 15th minute
It would get the message through that nobody cares about the beta male victims of feminism except their mums and their mums should be ashamed of themselves for having sons who are losers.
Paul Elam and Mike Buchanan have blocked me on Twitter. They know exactly what I think of him and the other pathetic contemptible beta male losers who want women at their conference because they want their mummy or women who look like their mummy to be there to hold their hand.
White nationalists are finally getting it that feminism is the cock blocker of nationalism.
White Sharia (which must have come from my idea of Secular Koranism which I conceived of to help British people with mental health problems) is now being discussed by nationalist YouTubers.
Western leaders have had their brains rotted by feminism. Europe Fights Back with Candles and Teddy Bears: https://t.co/hMJADFg7fC
@AnthonyLarme Like Paul Elam, Erin Pizzey suffers from the disability of being unable to propose slut shaming. It is the nuclear option of antifeminism.
@AnthonyLarme If you are a certain age, you prefer to go to your grave with your beliefs intact, otherwise you would have to denounce your former beliefs.
@AnthonyLarme Let's face it: people over a certain age are going to want to think things will still be OK while they live before the shit hits the fan.
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey As a political activist, Paul Elam has a duty to consider all proposals, even those he dislikes. We are not talking about the sheeple.
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey As a political activist, Erin Pizzey has a duty to consider all proposals, even those she dislikes. She can't even discuss the points I make
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey The most Erin Pizzey can do is to try to get anti-feminists to ignore me and my propsals. Hardly rational or honourable, is it?
@AnthonyLarme Even if a proposed talk by me attracts the attention of the authorities and the conference cannot take place, the point will have been made.
@AnthonyLarme What I propose concerns all the men and women of the world. If I were allowed to make my point, reasonable and moral men would agree with me
@AnthonyLarme You are not planning to make them on my behalf either online or at the conference. More than your job's worth. What about you, @DoctorEuge?
@AnthonyLarme I tried to get people to find out from Mike Buchanan precisely why he objected to me, but it seems he is unable to articulate his reasons.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd be discussing how a one party theocracy would defeat feminism.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it could be discussing how God was invented to fight the matriarchy.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd be discussing how fornication distracts men/women from marriage
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd b discussing how fornication distracts men/women from parenting
@DoctorEuge That is why I need to be there so they get my message loud and clear. MGTOWs are a manifestation of the matriarchy and part of the problem.
@DoctorEuge It is so repulsively effeminate and hypocritical for gentile and non-Muslim MRAs to pretend to care about the foreskins of Jews and Muslims.
@DoctorEuge I don't see how. People will think the beta male victims of feminism are just being antisemitic and Islamophobic, as they always have been.
@DoctorEuge It's the easiest thing to distinguish betwn FGM and male circumcision: the former prevents the victim from enjoying sex, the latter doesn't.
@DoctorEuge You have more or less admitted that your desire to ban male circumcision is to annoy Jews and Muslims. You mistakenly think this is winnable
@DoctorEuge The purpose of FGM is to prevent the female from enjoying sex so she won't be a slut. I will explain it to you as many times as you require.
@DoctorEuge I am afraid who we are is related to how *others* regard us and is nothing to do with what we think we are entitled to eg respect, sex etc.
@DoctorEuge With the young who say they do not care about each other's social status, attractiveness to others in their age group defines their status.
@DoctorEuge Beta males victims of feminism have no alpha male leader to protect their interests, only other beta males like Paul Elam and Warren Farrell
@DoctorEuge Why won't beta male victims of feminism find an alpha male leader? Cos beta "leaders" like Paul Elam/Mike Buchanan don't want that to happen
@DoctorEuge Beta male leaders like Paul Elam and Mike Buchanan want to hang on to whatever leadership role they managed to acquire even if they are crap
@DoctorEuge No man with alpha male qualities would want to risk his status to protect a bunch of losers ie unmarriageable beta male victims of feminism.
@DoctorEuge Because Paul Elam is repulsively beta. He is mediocre n vulgar. He probably has a girlfriend he doesn't want to upset by promoting my ideas.
@DoctorEuge I am the closest you men are going to get with leadership qualities, but you won't have me because I am female, and are scared of my ideas.
@DoctorEuge Karen Straughan is not going to inspire men. She's not even married and is in an irregular relationship. She won't discuss my ideas either.
@DoctorEuge If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution is patriarchy. Displays of Islamophobia and antisemitism by gentiles do not help their cause
