THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label male circumcision. Show all posts
Showing posts with label male circumcision. Show all posts
This truly distatesful request for donations is about banning male circumcision and an expression of antisemitism and Islamophobia being championed by an unmarried mother who is campaigning against feminism but who won't support the restoration of the patriarchy. The man who runs the show for anti-feminism in the UK, Mike Buchanan, is too cowardly to discuss abolishing no fault divorce with me.
If he were prepared to discuss such matters with me, he would have been told in no uncertain terms that Jewish and Muslim men and women who believe in their marriage vows
1) have better gender relations and therefore tend to marry each other more
2) are more likely to stay together as a married couple for the sake of their children
3) tend to bring up better quality children than the non-Muslim gentile post-Christian who is more likely to be brought up fatherless, using the feminine stratagems of his unmarried mother to get his way in our culture of entitlement and excuses, under-achieving and less unemployable than those who were brought up by both their parents living together in regular contact with their extended family.
Presumably, this inability to compete against Jews and Muslims is the reason why they are so bent on making Jews and Muslims feel unwelcome in this country with the unstated and ultimate aim of expelling them.
Nationalists who have a problem with immigration, particularly with Muslim immigration, should note that the only reason why the West is being flooded with immigrants is because feminism has taken hold and destroyed gender relations, the practice of marriage as well as the human stock of the next generation by normalising bastardy and single motherhood.
It is laughable that such people claim to represent any sort of campaign against feminism.
There will be no nationalism without patriarchy, because only patriarchy would produce enough good strong men capable of facing the truth and defending the national interest. There is no one in the establishment and anti-establishment parties that has any hope of leading any movement against feminism, because they are moral and political pygmies too afraid of speaking truth to power because they are afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence or even have a dialogue with me on these matters.
The matriarchy and its lady judge Lady Hale have uninvented marriage but the men are incapable of even thinking of restoring the patriarchy. They are indifferent, silent and cowed. To them marriage is a sacrifice they no longer wish to make because they know they are unmarriageable. These degenerates no longer even have the masculinity to propose that marriage be made a better deal for men who want to become fathers of legitimate children whom they wish to properly parent.
What could be easier to do and say than to propose the abolition of no fault divorce which penalises the wealthier partner when he has done no wrong?
But these emasculated unmarriageable men instead prefer to waste their energy and time campaigning to ban male circumcision because they already know they are unmarriageable. Their game is to somehow benefit from the fact that most atheist antisemitic Islamophobic and sexually liberated gentiles resent Jews and Muslims and want to make them feel uncomfortable and unwelcome. The fact that freedom of belief is a Western liberal tradition means nothing to them. You cannot expect the degenerate to grasp and apply a principle much less adhere to it, after all.
They are to a man shameless atheists, nihilists, cowards and cattle whose main purpose is to enjoy as much sexual and sensual pleasure as they can before they pop their clogs.
Their other main purpose is to go to their grave with the belief that they, their ancestors, their government and their Christianity and liberal democracy were absolutely and perfectly wise and right about everything, until the Jews and Muslims came and ruined everything.
It is a sign of irrationality and lunacy to harbour two contradictory and mutually exclusive ideas in your mind while claiming to have won the argument and then closing your eyes and ears.
Such men and their civilisation can have no future. Nationalists who think in these terms are by definition nihilists. The people they hate and fear - Jews and Muslims in particular - however, are not.
Which is worse? To know you are definitely lost or to not even know you are lost?
The dysgenic feminist State won't go away quietly and will only go when it is overthrown by men, not by women whose legs you like to film and slavishly agree with who need to go on courses. If Elizabeth Hobson were a man, would she get any kind of a job as Director of Communications? The fact that she is "resident anti-feminist on Radio Kent" says how harmless she is. Unmarried mothers are hardly going to call for the patriarchy to be restored and the only way to do that now in our "advanced" matriarchy is with Quran.com/24/2 Elizabeth won't be agreeing to be interviewed by me, will she?
It is interesting that when Elizabeth couldn't be interviewed by Piers Morgan and Mike Buchanan said he was prepared to stand in for her, he was refused. A dysgenic feminist state prefers the young to the old, the female to the male, the inarticulate to the articulate, the irrelevant to the relevant, all because she has good legs. Anti-feminism won't be taken seriously until and unless alpha male leaders take charge and stop hiding behind women. Mike Buchanan was born beta and will always be perceived as beta by women and men.
INSTEAD OF CALLING FOR THE ABOLITION OF NO FAULT DIVORCE, THESE ANTI-FEMINISTS WANT TO BAN MALE CIRCUMCISION AS A DOG WHISTLE TO ANTI-IMMIGRATION AND UNEMPLOYABLE ISLAMOPHOBIC AND ANTISEMITIC BETA MALES OUR DYSGENIC FEMINIST STATE HAS CREATED AND MARGINALISED
So what are the solutions she advocates? Banning male circumcision in an egregious display of antisemitism and Islamophobia? Does she even call for the restoration of the patriarchy?
Many people see these protestations are just a cover. That matriarchal Iceland is seeking to ban circumcision is a clear implicit display of hostility towards Jews and Muslims. Deny it all you like, but you will never be able to disprove that impression.
The term for circumcision in Hebrew – brit mila – “a covenant by circumcision”– emphasises that it is this covenant which created the Jews a nation, by Abraham’s acceptance of circumcision on behalf of his yet-unborn descendants. Even non-observant Jews who do not take the biblical story seriously, accept that for Jews, for at least two millennia, circumcision was the one indispensable commandment that makes one a Jew – not living in the Jewish homeland, obeying other commandments, or anything else.
To ban circumcision, to ban joining the covenant, the rabbinical court and many Jews fear, would be (however unintentionally) to ban Jewish national identity itself.
Iceland male circumcision ban: MP behind plan 'didn’t think it was necessary to consult' Jewish and Muslim groups, amid growing anger 'I don’t see it as a religious matter,' insists Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir, a female MP. The matriarchy of Iceland understandably feel threatened by the patriarchal moral values Judaism and Islam represent.
By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared.
It is so obvious that gentile non-Muslims cannot compete against Jews and Muslim immigrants in their own homelands. This pointless show of implicit antisemitism and Islamophobia will get you nowhere. In fact, it is just a waste of time and energy and is indeed a form of displacement activity. If you are against feminism, restore the patriarchy. Since Elizabeth Hobson is herself an unmarried mother, it would be like expecting turkeys to vote for Christmas.
SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY FEMINISM
Has Elizabeth Hobson articulated any solutions to the problems caused by feminism? I hope someone will attempt to answer this question if she and Mike Buchanan do not.
GENUINE LEADERSHIP AND MORAL AUTHORITY IS REQUIRED FOR RESTORING THE PATRIARCHY
You will never be able to successfully challenge feminism without restoring the patriarchy. How sad that the men who wish to challenge feminism are no longer even capable of conceiving of the idea of restoring the patriarchy.
The only way to restore the patriarchy is of course to reconsecrate marriage.
Marriage cannot be reconsecrated by a Directrix of Communications who is herself an unashamed unmarried mother who cannot see the point of marriage, can it?
Or by a leader who refuses to talk about supporting marriage - the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy.
The reason why you dare not talk about restoring the patriarchy is because you already know that men who already have been the victims of feminism - including Mike Buchanan himself - are in fact unmarriageable. The more you continue to hide behind women who do not respect marriage, the more morally compromised you become and the less moral authority you will have.
Leadership is everything about moral authority, but the concept seems to be entirely lost amongst male political activists.
The Liberty Belles are "associated" with me in the sense that they call themselves anti-feminists, as do I.
I have never apologised for Nazis and no Nazis have ever asked me to apologise on their behalf. This is a meaningless term but is nevertheless annoying. If they are trying to suggest I am an antisemite, I would like evidence.
I at any rate have firmly dissociated myself from their crackpot campaign of the Liberty Bells to ban male circumcision as a form of unexpressed antisemism and Islamophobia.
Elizabeth Hobson of the Liberty Belles proposing to ban male circumcision
I would be interested to know the nature of the talent Natoya Raymond is claimed to have. Is she a talented debater? But she has now cancelled a debate with me she had previously agreed to, so one is probably right to deduce she is not confident of winning it.
My definition of being extreme is proposing a solution to that is over and beyond what is necessary to solve the problem of feminism. If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution must be patriarchy, must it not? Patriarchy is impossible without marriage being practised. Marriage will not be practised if premarital sex is considered a human right rather than a sexual offence. Argue against this if you can.
To my knowledge, three of the Liberty Belles are unmarried mothers. I have proposed that fornicatresses with illegitimate offspring be lashed 100 times per illegitimate offspring, which is going easy on them considering the actual wording of quran.com/24/2. Presumably this the opinion of mine that these unmarried mothers find so "repugnant". Considering most babies born these days are now illegitimate, I would dispute that my proposal to shame sluts is evidence of timidity on my part but evidence of the opposite: defiance of the majority. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/11564624/Most-births-will-be-out-of-wedlock-within-10-years.html
Beta male victims of feminism (BMVOFs) are gentile and non-Muslim men who know their status is being lowered relative to women, Jews and Muslims because of their thraldom to fornication. They also know that their political establishment is a matriarchy and know they have no protectors amongst senior male politicians who wouldn't dream of standing up for the interests of BMVOFs, despised by middle class feminazis in government and public life. Because white middle class men in public life are afraid of white middle class feminazis in public life, these BMVOFs know they have no protectors. Why, even the BNP, won't even admit to the existence of BMVOFs and refuse them protection. There was no proposal to abolish no fault divorce by the BNP, was there? This is because so few of them are married. They too worship the slut and dare not offend her.
And so it has come to pass that pretending to be concerned about male circumcision is their effeminate and pathetic way of trying to gain status.
Their thinking is this: if gentiles and non-Muslims save the foreskins of Jewish and Muslim men, they become higher in status.
To pretend someone is in need of rescue or pity someone is of course to assert a higher status over the person who is pitied/to be rescued. It is always easier for someone defeated in argument to say "I pity you [for holding the views you do and taking the position you have because your rational arguments are indicative of a person lacking in irrationality, sentimentality and a desire to make futile gestures as a display of compassion/femininity/effeminacy]" than try to win the argument using truth, logic and morality.
@AnthonyLarme Like Paul Elam, Erin Pizzey suffers from the disability of being unable to propose slut shaming. It is the nuclear option of antifeminism.
@AnthonyLarme If you are a certain age, you prefer to go to your grave with your beliefs intact, otherwise you would have to denounce your former beliefs.
@AnthonyLarme Let's face it: people over a certain age are going to want to think things will still be OK while they live before the shit hits the fan.
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey As a political activist, Paul Elam has a duty to consider all proposals, even those he dislikes. We are not talking about the sheeple.
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey As a political activist, Erin Pizzey has a duty to consider all proposals, even those she dislikes. She can't even discuss the points I make
@AnthonyLarme@erin_pizzey The most Erin Pizzey can do is to try to get anti-feminists to ignore me and my propsals. Hardly rational or honourable, is it?
@AnthonyLarme Even if a proposed talk by me attracts the attention of the authorities and the conference cannot take place, the point will have been made.
@AnthonyLarme What I propose concerns all the men and women of the world. If I were allowed to make my point, reasonable and moral men would agree with me
@AnthonyLarme You are not planning to make them on my behalf either online or at the conference. More than your job's worth. What about you, @DoctorEuge?
@AnthonyLarme I tried to get people to find out from Mike Buchanan precisely why he objected to me, but it seems he is unable to articulate his reasons.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd be discussing how a one party theocracy would defeat feminism.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it could be discussing how God was invented to fight the matriarchy.
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd be discussing how fornication distracts men/women from marriage
@DoctorEuge AVFM is wasting time/energy campaigning against male circumcision when it cd b discussing how fornication distracts men/women from parenting
@DoctorEuge That is why I need to be there so they get my message loud and clear. MGTOWs are a manifestation of the matriarchy and part of the problem.
@DoctorEuge It is so repulsively effeminate and hypocritical for gentile and non-Muslim MRAs to pretend to care about the foreskins of Jews and Muslims.
@DoctorEuge I don't see how. People will think the beta male victims of feminism are just being antisemitic and Islamophobic, as they always have been.
@DoctorEuge It's the easiest thing to distinguish betwn FGM and male circumcision: the former prevents the victim from enjoying sex, the latter doesn't.
@DoctorEuge You have more or less admitted that your desire to ban male circumcision is to annoy Jews and Muslims. You mistakenly think this is winnable
@DoctorEuge The purpose of FGM is to prevent the female from enjoying sex so she won't be a slut. I will explain it to you as many times as you require.
@DoctorEuge I am afraid who we are is related to how *others* regard us and is nothing to do with what we think we are entitled to eg respect, sex etc.
@DoctorEuge With the young who say they do not care about each other's social status, attractiveness to others in their age group defines their status.
@DoctorEuge Beta males victims of feminism have no alpha male leader to protect their interests, only other beta males like Paul Elam and Warren Farrell
@DoctorEuge Why won't beta male victims of feminism find an alpha male leader? Cos beta "leaders" like Paul Elam/Mike Buchanan don't want that to happen
@DoctorEuge Beta male leaders like Paul Elam and Mike Buchanan want to hang on to whatever leadership role they managed to acquire even if they are crap
@DoctorEuge No man with alpha male qualities would want to risk his status to protect a bunch of losers ie unmarriageable beta male victims of feminism.
@DoctorEuge Because Paul Elam is repulsively beta. He is mediocre n vulgar. He probably has a girlfriend he doesn't want to upset by promoting my ideas.
@DoctorEuge I am the closest you men are going to get with leadership qualities, but you won't have me because I am female, and are scared of my ideas.
@DoctorEuge Karen Straughan is not going to inspire men. She's not even married and is in an irregular relationship. She won't discuss my ideas either.
@DoctorEuge If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution is patriarchy. Displays of Islamophobia and antisemitism by gentiles do not help their cause
If u r prevented from practising Jewish traditions then your Jewish identity is more threatened than if people deny the Holocaust, surely? https://t.co/2ogp7iEjJF
Today, I took the opportunity of formally dissociating myself from the nonsense of gentiles associated with anti-Semitism campaigning for the banning of male circumcision because they are pretending that they care about the foreskins of Jewish and Muslim boys.
I actually find this degree of hypocrisy nauseating. The people who most promote this are militant atheists, people who also want to ban kosher and halal slaughter, feminists who wish to officiously deprive boys of the benefit of this rite of passage and people who voted Brexit ie the group of people most likely to be anti-Semites and Islamophobes. They tend however not to be proletarian because the average prole is more likely to choke on the viscosity of this particular hypocrisy. It is the educated middle class anti-Semite and Islamophobe who holds this view, the kind who is too intellectually insecure and cowardly to express his hatred of Jews through questioning the law against Holocaust Denial, officially still legal in this country.There is also something particularly repulsively effeminate about pretending you care about the foreskins of Jewish and Muslims boys if you are an anti-Semitic and Islamophobic male.
Below are the comments I made:
Only Jews and Muslims would be exercised about the proposal to ban circumcision and the gentiles who support this wouldn't care about the subject beyond its anti-Semitic and Islamophobic connotations.
Proposing to ban male circumcision is simply an expression of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.
The perception by Jews is that proposing to ban male circumcision is ipso factoanti-Semitic.
It is like these activists believe they have found yourself a loophole to annoy Jews and Muslims without being accused of being anti-Semitic and Islamophobic, and this is it.
Presumably the best case scenario anti-circumcision activists desire is to be in a position to encourage Jewish/Muslim sons to sue their Jewish/Muslim parents for their lack of foreskin to discourage Judaism/Islam and their numbers.
The fact is that you would like Jewish/Muslim sons to sue their parents for depriving them of their foreskin, otherwise, why even talk about it?
Either you are an anti-Semite who for tactical reasons denies this, or you genuinely don't know that you would come across as an anti-Semite or Islamophobic, which is naive of you.
Male circumcision does not interfere with a man's ability to enjoy sex or his performance.
Gentiles are known to have their sons circumcised. The English upper classes were known to have this procedure performed on their sons.
The banning of male circumcision would mean infringing the First Amendment.
While I am an anti-feminist, have mixed in nationalist circles and been accused of anti-Semitism myself, I wish to formally distance myself from this kind of futile anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. Challenging the validity of Holocaust Denial laws in the Free West is infinitely more productive than anti-Semites and Islamophobes hypocritically pretending they care about the foreskins of Jewish and Muslim boys.
If you had said "I have had sex with a great and equal number of circumcised men and uncircumcised men and am really the best person to ask about their respective performance in the sack," we would all be agog to know on what basis you say having sex with uncircumcised men is better than having sex with circumcised men.
Banning circumcision would be an infringement of the religious freedom of Jews and Muslims to practice circumcision because you are banning this tradition and practice common to Judaism and Islam.
Perhaps the best women to ask are prostitutes, but I bet they will have nothing meaningful to say about the respective performance of sex with circumcised men and sex with uncircumcised men.
The circumcised penis is more pleasing to my eye. It obviously does not harm Jewish and Muslim men. This unbecoming campaign is simply a manifestation of white gentile anxiety and neurosis about being exploited by Jews and invaded by Muslims.
