THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Translate
Showing posts with label Richard Spencer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Spencer. Show all posts
14:00 "The problem with Islam is that it is illiberal."
15:00 "The right way of opposing Islam is recognising and seeing its power and maybe imitating and learning from it, recognising that we can earn a similar power."
Vague Christianity
Sir John Glubb
Decline of Rome, feminism in Baghdad
Patriarchy
The fall of Baghdad was caused by Muslims ignoring the rules of Islam and allowing feminism.
The decadent Ottoman Empire had child drag queens etc too.
Cecil Rhodes
Liberal nihilism threatens Islam.
Muslim terrorism would provoke nationalist sentiment.
Muslim terrorists were complete degenerates anyway.
Men in the West try to find an identity outside liberalism and what beckons to them is Islam.
Islamism is a rejection of Western liberalism.
Christianity is an unstable identity because it depends on the belief that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
Once you exit the nihilism of the America ie drink, drugs and porn, you enter a world of meaning.
There is a great kernel of truth about the link between Muslim terrorism and White Nationalism.
There is meaning in our lives outside, drink, drugs and porn and Islam and this means action, which may sometimes be violent, but is always political.
Political action in the form of terrorism is action serving the cause, however much you disapprove of it. The cause is the interests of men who want reproductive opportunities with women ie a reasonable opportunity of having legitimate children and a stable marriage.
By draconian censorship in the MSM and alternative media against people who want to discuss this, the matriarchy displays its own insecurity and fear.
The matriarchy will continue to deny men this opportunity if left unchecked. Those who wish to ruthlessly suppress discussion of this urgent question will be directly and indirectly provoking terrorism and so too will those who refuse to have a full and frank discussion of this matter without wanting to shoot the messenger.
I am this messenger.
There will always be political violence in the form of war, revolution and terrorism and government should be about preventing this by making things seem fair enough. Liberalism is no longer capable of giving that impression and a dialogue is needed.
Nihilism in the form of violent political action gives these these nihilistic terrorists meaning and purpose which they currently lack as incels and MGTOWs.
This is probably one of the speeches Naik made that got him into trouble with those who control Western media.
Richard Spencer:
"We might need to adopt some of the virtues of Islam if not all of it in order to survive. It is a kind of natural reaction against the ultimate consequence of Western ways of thinking which is if it feels good do it to satisfy your empty soul with material goods and that something like Islam is ultimately necessary."
0:48 Richard Spencer: "Islam has its advantages too."
When Spencer talks about ethnocentrism, he really means group solidarity and for that to happen it male solidarity is required and this requires what the Victorians called moral restraint. In other words, the shaming of sluts and slut-fuckers with quran.com/24/2
1:00 Spencer: "Is Islam the last hope of the West?"
Having a religion that promotes patriarchal moral values creates group solidarity because it creates shared values greater and wider than that of physical attributes eg race, youth, beauty. Group solidarity can ultimately only be achieved by male solidarity and men competing against each other for the sexual favours of capricious and immoral women not their wife while failing to parent their legitimate offspring properly will only cause anomie and atomisation and the decline and fall of their civilisation.
By group solidarity, we really mean male solidarity against sluts who bribe men with fornication to take their mind off what is actually happening to their civilisation. Bribing men with even more varieties of recreational sex is a way of taking their minds off the indignity of this low status.
In a matriarchy all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother and this includes POTUS who has not so far criticised the root of the problem: widespread bastardy.
If you wonder why no male politician will stand up for a principle any more, the reason was first what happened to Enoch Powell and then Keith Joseph. The principle in question was that of governing in the national interest, in case you were wondering.
13:00 Keith Woods talks about the Bosniaks and Serbs. Of course the principles of Islam cannot survive in a liberal democracy because such a democracy is a matriarchy and as such would be force-feeding its citizens sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting. For Islam to work in your society, it would have to be a theocracy ie a society that governs in accordance with the laws of God. Otherwise, you would be like someone complaining that the engine in his car won't start because the engine has already been taken out.
14:00 Richard Spencer asks "How does Islam increase ethnocentrism? How does Christianity not do it to such a degree or maybe the opposite?"
By ethnocentrism Spencer really means group solidarity. Group solidarity can only be achieved by shared values ie a moral system effective at ensuring that people do the right thing to keep the group in existence and apart from others.
All religions are moral systems. The golden thread that runs through all five world religions is that they support patriarchal moral values ie marriage and family values which go to creating a stable society where life is reasonably predictable, moral laws enforced and criminal behaviour punished. Group solidarity means male solidarity and male solidarity is only possible if sluts and slut-fuckers are shamed. quran.com/24/2 LGBT forms of recreational sex to cheat the system would also be forbidden. quran.com/4/15quran.com/4/16
Christianity is now indistinguishable from Liberalism. In the 21st century, Liberalism means nothing more than sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting and the degeneracy caused by the failure to see to it that most parents are married parents.
Tolerance of unmarried parents and a culture of fornication is clearly linked to lack of racial homogeneity and lack of male solidarity.
Basically, societies that don't tolerate unmarried parents have children who do a whole lot better at school than societies that have normalised bastardy. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-50563833
14:00 Dutton seems unaware European royal families perpetuated themselves by cousin marriage.
16:00 FMG is not mentioned at all in the Koran and this disgusting practice originates from Africa.
18:00 Ridiculously, Dutton talks about the "permanent erection" of Islam. I do hope people will actually read the Koran for themselves instead of believing in the sensationalist nonsense of the IQ-obsessed Dutton which is one of the badges of right-wingery these days which include racism, antisemitism and Islamophobia. Sadly, the alt-right don't actually know how low IQ they are, which is probably why they think Dutton is so very clever, because they don't know any better.
25:00 Keith Woods has heard very strange things about Muslims in Qatar that I have not heard of. Wahhabism described by Dutton but I urge everyone to take this with a large pinch of salt.
30:00 Spencer: "Religion determines who we are."
No religion, no group identity. It also tells us not to be a society of sluts, slut-fuckers and bastards.
"In terms of religion being separate from politics, I find this ridiculous. Religion is part of politics. It is part of how a population understands itself or an empire governs. We need to be willing to think in these terms of how religion affects the way we think politically."
The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference. Islam accepts the logic of your laws reflecting your chosen moral system. The real "religion" of the early 21st century West is the practice of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting.
Islam also accepts the logic that a moral rule is more likely to be obeyed if it is the law and that any law is more likely to be obeyed for longer by more people if it is perceived to come from a Supreme Being that is omnipotent, omniscient, created the universe we are a part of, knows our hearts and minds and occasionally answers prayers who is also perfectly moral and cares about us individually.
Even if God were only a creation of Man, He was created for a purpose, that of assisting Man in his government, politics, law and spirituality. It would be a waste not to use this infinite and free resource to correct our previous mistakes, which only happened as a consequence of not obeying His laws.
"Islam is here. It is a hugely popular religion. Islam can inspire men to take up arms, to fight, to dominate, to engage in political activities. Therefore we need to seriously think about it in evolutionary terms. We are the descendants of religious doctrines."
Jews are the descendants of the religious doctrines of the Judaism based on the Torah.
Muslims are the descendants of the religious doctrines of Islam based on the Koran.
Do Christians even exist any more? If Christians are defined as those who believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God - considered by both Jews and Muslims to be blasphemous and idolatrous - are there any believing Christians? If you believe in this absurdity, you are too credulous. If you only pretend to believe in it, you are corrupt and are either a member of a corrupt priesthood, or wish to enter it to benefit from the status and income being a member of this parasitic class would give you.
It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy walk hand in hand. This is because while on the one hand Christians know that the Ten Commandments forbid idolatry and blasphemy, they practise it themselves while condemning it in others. Not only to do they practise idolatry and blasphemy, their idolatry is Supreme Idolatry and their blasphemy is the Ultimate Blasphemy.
What could be more offensive to God and blasphemous than to have Mary called His mother and her illegitimate son confused for Him? Yet, because Christians who have been practising this idolatry and blasphemy for 2000 years think they can continue to get away with flouting what He has specifically and expressly forbidden since Mosaic times. This must be because they are really atheists who don't believe in any of this nonsense at all. They are only pretending to do so because they think it makes them better than us, but now that they know they are only despised for their hypocrisy, they are in denial of the extent and depth of their depraved blasphemy. If they really did believe in God, they would fear His wrath. After all, the beginning of wisdom is the fear of God. It seems that two millennia of believing in this blasphemous absurdity (or pretending to) has utterly rotted their minds and morals.
If you point out the idolatry and blasphemy of Christian worship with the accompanying obscenity of pretending to eat the flesh and drink the blood of God Himself that Christians call the Eucharist, they will look at you with apparent incomprehension. If you finally get them to take your point, they will shrug their shoulders indifferently because they are obviously more invested in their idolatry than the correct worship of God, heedless of the divine prohibition against idolatry and blasphemy in the Ten Commandments, and say "So what?"
32:00 The important thing to note is that religious people who follow their religious principles don't have bastards. Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic. Religious people have a moral system that maintains minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are not parents of bastards while sexuallly liberated atheists who are also nihilists don't think a degenerate next generation is a problem because once they are dead, the actions and character of their badly parented bastard offspring - if they have any at all - is not their problem any more.
33:00 The people with the right to have sex and legitimate children in a patriarchy would be marriageable men and women while it is a free for all in our degenerate matriarchy.
35:00 Atheists are nihilists who decline to make themselves marriageable or make any sacrifices to bring up the next generation. They will tend to be Green Party supporters who are more or less told it is OK to mutilate your sex organs (thereby sterilising yourself and destroying any chance of becoming a good parent of legitimate offspring) in order to masquerade as a member of the opposite sex) before they are adult. The parent most likely to support such a course of action would be the unmarried mother who will not have to contend with the objections of her illegitimate offspring's father in a society where fathers have been denuded of their rights.
36:00 Dutton: "For society to remain healthy, 90% of it must not breed."
40:00 Dutton talks about the Christian duty to "understand God's revelation". The best way to understand the nature and purpose of God is to acknowledge the wisdom of His laws. Dutton should be informed that the New Testament says nothing about science, but the Koran does. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292970930_SCIENTIFIC_FACTS_IN_QURAN
47:00 As well as his bizarre stories of Muslims in Qatar believing God has arms and legs, Keith Woods says "Judaism does not have a concept of an afterlife". Obviously, he has not heard of the olam haba. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/olam-ha-ba
Even more bizarrely, Keith Woods seems to think that Jews came after the Greeks because he says Jews got the idea of the soul from the Greeks. What else will he say next? That the earth is flat?
51:00 Western identity is a fundamental problem.
53:00 The Reformation was basically European monarchs asserting their independence from the Pope.
1:00:00 Richard Spencer invites us to consider if Islam could win and whether it has any virtues.
1:03:00 Feminism and White Sharia
1:05:00 Spencer would like a dialogue with Muslims. He could dip his toe in the waters by talking to me first.
Richard Spencer:
We might need to adopt some of the virtues of Islam if not all of it in order to survive. It is a kind of natural reaction against the ultimate consequence of Western ways of thinking which is if it feels good do it to satisfy your empty soul with material goods and that something like Islam is ultimately necessary.
https://www.facebook.com/claire.khaw.906/posts/213565300040332?comment_id=213999576663571¬if_id=1582807342698499¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic for a discussion about this. The mulishness of Morally Compromised Slut-Fuckers should be an eye opener. Men who want to be married fathers and who want to parent their legitimate offspring properly should of course ignore the naysayers who refuse to express remorse and who refuse to repent by supporting Secular Koranism, preferring to blame Jews and Muslims for the consequences of condoning fornication and unmarried parenthood - the primary cause of degeneracy and the decline and fall of Western civilisation.
Remember, Mark Collett is not a married father and Millennial Woes probably has no prospect of becoming a married father either because he is so incorrigibly neurotic with his weak character, flabby morals and inability to discuss the purpose of religion with me even after admitting that it was an urgent and important topic in 2019 at https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/03/will-millennial-woes-have-deleted-my.html
11:00 Spencerian make believe which he calls "aristic, literary and philosophical"
12:00 Nietzsche and "grandpa's liberalism"
13:00 Liberalism = Conservatism = Feminism = Gay Marriage = Transgenderism = Decline and Fall of Western Civilisation governed by governments prioritising the preferences of unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of their casually conceived and casually parented illegitimate offspring as opposed to prioritising the preferences of married fathers who wish to properly parent their legitimate offspring https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48798875
20:00 Spencer will not be agreeing to an interview with me.
21:00 Spiritualism
22:00 The matriarchy doesn't give a damn about the men who aspire to become married fathers
23:00 Forget Secular Koranism, because Indo-Aryan neo-paganism is in the course of being created and crafted by Gandalf and Daniel Sienkiewicz to plug the moral vacuum of idolatrous and kaput Christianity. They subscribe to the rejectionism of all the Abrahamic faiths being promoted by Church of Entropy who says Christianity and Islam are "Jewish" and should be rejected on that basis. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/09/doooovid-to-church-of-entropy-most-of.html
24:00 Legacy
25:00 The Doctrine of the Trinity is ipso facto idolatry.
26:00 Conducting another Inquisition and waging another Crusade
27:00 White supremacy and Western imperialism
28:00 Political activism according to the larpers, losers, degenerates and neurotics of the alt-right
Jen Scharf: "There is no actual evidence to suggest that Jesus and Muhammad existed. We could just as easily say that these were invented fantasies to justify the monopoly on usury that the Jews already had. "
31:00 Church of Entropy and her proposed theocracy
12:00 "My starting point is philosophical, literary and artistic: it is not pragmatic politics."
14:00 The right-wing is just reacting to events and on the defensive.
18:00 Nietzsche and nihilism
19:00 Romanticism, nationalism and grandpa's liberalism
23:00 U2 and Liberal Catholicism
26:00 Cringey singing by Spencer
27:00 Blood and soil, Nihilism and meaninglessness
28:00 Scandinavians and Consumerism
31:00 Spencerian "morality" of going to the gym and having sex with women not his wife
32:00 Hades, flourishing, being weak and boring
33:00 Jews "sucked", Christianity, Liberalism, Nihilism
34:00 The fall of the Roman Empire
35:00 Sexual morality
36:00 Post-modern Americans
37:00 The status and statue of Robert E Lee, the slave owner
39:00 Radical morality and the liberal paradigm
40:00 Spencer would prefer a Radical Communist to create a confrontation with "weak, limp Conservative-Liberals" to the status quo. He wants nihilism to be a drunk driver driving over the speed limit to bring about a confrontation, which he thinks the alt-right would win. But he denies being an accelerationist and claims he only wants a "spiritual" confrontation and is not a materialist.
42:00 A rebuilding of liberalism or Chinese hegemony, "our hegemony"
43:00 "We are not ever going to be left alone", "re-establishing Rome"
44:00 Jared Taylor
45:00 "We live on a world island."
47:00 "We should go out and conquer the world."
49:00 "Collective/spiritual death", "deep rot"
50:00 "Obsession with the Chinese"
51:00 "We allowed this to happen."
52:00 Tattoos
54:00 Imperialism, exploitation, oil, colonialism, the white man's burden
55:00 American global hegemony
57:00 The anti-hero, the villain, the Great Satan, global hegemony, doing evil in order to do good
58:00 Pax Americana and the Thucydides Trap
59:00 "I want a white hegemony but I want it done by other people." "As an aspiring elite, I can at least offer some respect to the current elite in the sense that this whole system works." "The global order should be respected." "Some respect should be shown to our imperial overlords." "Our rival elites"
1:01:00 ""We have to recognise the other", "a vision of Africa", "a vision for Native Americans", "a radically traditionalist vision for Native Americans"
1:03:00 "certain responsibilities we owe to them" "White supremacy was what kept the world in order."
1:04:00 "radical traditionalist solutions", "imperialism", "soft jazz playing in the background"
If a man does not have a supportive wife, any endeavour he undertakes would fail. Low status males who transgress against the culture don't get supportive wives . If they started supportive, they might turn bad after they notice that their husband is a compulsive womaniser. Maybe she decided to cash her chips in while she still had them, or, she wanted to make public that she did not want anything to do with him again so she could move on to a better man now.
Why would she support him if she doesn't think he is going to win? The best way to draw a line under her association with Spencer is to stab him in the front in the most public way possible.
It is not safe for men to marry until no fault divorce is abolished.
In the UK the men's rights party is led by a repulsive beta male loser called Mike Buchanan. Instead of proposing the abolition of no fault divorce, he is expending his energy and time hopelessly on campaigning to ban circumcision as an expression of unexpressed antisemitism and Islamophobia. That is how hopeless white men are these days. No wonder their women hate them and make ever more outrageous demands on them in the hope of shaming and angering them enough to take back control. The penny has not yet dropped though.
36:00 A cackle of misogynistic male laughter at a sane old wife being incarcerated in an asylum when her husband wanted to marry a younger woman. When divorce is not practicable, murder and other measures are resorted to.
40:00 Great point by Brundlefly about neither Johnson nor Spencer being prepared to do the grunt work of being nice to the proles. Hitler did not disdain to take an interest in his proles. I have done it all though. Hint, hint.
This is how I see it: if you want to get to ethno-nationalism, you have to go past civic nationalism. If you are in Idaho and want to get to the Pacific Ocean, you have to go past Oregon. I can take you guys to to Oregon where I think you will all be happy enough, but if you want to go to the beach, you will have to make your own way there.
You cannot do any of the stuff you want to do because you cannot behave well towards each other because you are weak, low status and immoral men. People will look at you scornfully and think to themselves "Such men deserve to suffer." This means you will only have bad leaders and treacherous followers, and nothing will be achieved.
50:00 On the new superchat rules, it appears that the walls are closing in and you really need to talk about restoring the patriarchy and shaming sluts with quran.com/24/2 because you might as well tackle the problem at its source: feminism. If they start banning that, we can get the Muslims to declare jihad and take overAHAHAHAHA
53:00 Muslims call themselves Sufis to show they are the peaceful kind of Muslim because you are meant to think they have no time for radicalism, extremism and terrorism because they are chanting most of the day.
1:07:00 The only way of getting your white ethnostate remains to get your political classes to see things your way and the only way to do that is be organised and not appear like lower class losers repulsive to women and find yourself a high status leader. But what high status male with anything to lose would want to be associated with you lot? If they wanted gardeners etc would they hire any of you? No, of course not. Oswald Mosley was an aristocratic leader, but the political establishment ganged up against him. Still, you have Trump who is really one in a billion.
1:19:00 Jews have a moral code, alt-right losers don't even know what that means. Jews also have a better genetic quality because Jews care about whom they marry, while alt-right losers are mostly illegitimate, singly parented and never knew their fathers. Jews are excellent at abstract reasoning ie deduction and morality, alt-right antisemites only know their base appetites and violent inclinations and have no self-awareness, no culture, no religion, no family, no God, no wife and no legitimate offspring who will be a credit to them. This means they are incapable of planning for the future or of sustained and focused organised action. Their women instinctively know this and this is why they are repulsive even to women of their own race and class.
58:00 "Some of sort a Christian identity" - but how will its morality be imposed other than through the law? To be Christian is to believe in the Trinity. If you don't really believe Christ is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God, you are not really Christian. The Inquisition was about ensuring this was properly understood by the forced converts. People wouldn't put up with this now and the Catholic Church lost its power centuries ago. Even if you could do it, is it worth forcing forced converts into church every Sunday? You wouldn't have the manpower to do it. In the end, all you can do is demand compliance with patriarchy restoring sharia and punish those who break those laws.
James Fountain
I know that Greg Johnson favors laws against no fault divorce and enforcement of laws against adultery and alienation of affection. It's a bit dismaying that so few self styled leaders and opinion makers on the dissident right have anything to say about such matters. Maybe there is a lot of conscious avoidance of the Tradcon label.
Claire Khaw
It is probably because most Western men have been deprived of their fathers by their mothers and you can't miss what you never had. Even if you believed in marriage etc, you might be wary of talking about it too much in case you annoy men whom you know who have no hope of marrying or who never knew their fathers. Embarrassment and fear of giving offence would be the reasons. I did go on about it when I was in the BNP until someone gave me a prod and said "We are mostly like that"!
After so many years of saying the same thing in different ways and proposing a one party theocracy, I trust people now get how bad the situation is iie that nothing short of my proposal would solve the problem.
The sad thing is that they are now retreating into the position of pretending that the problem has been solved, because Trump will make everything right again. Or, that after they conduct their pogrom, they will impose white sharia on their women , but in the meantime they will continue to enjoy the sexual liberation they have been enjoying ....
2:18:00 Doooovid: Israeli Jews find the Left more of a threat than the Right.
2:40:00 Kevin Grace affirms this.
3:09:00 Kevin Grace:
Trump is the last hope for civic nationalism in the United States. If he is brought down, all bets are off, because what follows him will be much stronger and much nastier.
Basically, degenerates only respond to visual queues and their own emotions of lust, anger, gluttony, hatred, pride etc. If you try to explain the meaning of words to them - especially, for example, the difference between race and nation, or abstract ideas like truth, logic, patriarchy etc - their eyes will fall shut and their mouths open.
Some of the alt-right remind me of what Greg Johnson was saying about blacks and how they just say anything that pops into their heads without any filters. This raises the hackles of white female voters and fills them with disgust and revulsion. The degenerate alt-right basically have a point about immigration, but the people who represent them have repulsive manners and speech and are revolting peasants. If they were Hindus they would be the Untouchables. In white society, they are called The Great Unwashed.
Greg Johnson talks getting a bus in DC and being the only white person on it. "You do notice certain things about blacks. They will say whatever pops into their head, out loud. They don't have any filters."
Listening to some of them makes me think of Trailer Trash, Idiocracy, Straw Dogs and Deliverance ....
But the alt-right remain surprised that people hate them, don't care that they suffer and want to replace them with robots after warehousing them for extinction on welfare. You must already know they don't want you as their employees. If no one wants you other than the unmarried mothers who have sex with you and badly bring up your illegitimate offspring they casually conceive, I guess you have no real purpose in life and might as well not exist or be replaced by people who are prepared to work and be good employees even if they are not white.
The revulsion Johnson clearly feels for blacks is probably the same in kind and nature to the revulsion the rest of gentile white society in the West feels for the alt-right. The solution, if the alt-right ever wish to hold sway, is to keep the knuckle-dragging peasants who have no best behaviour mode because their unmarried mothers deprived them of their fathers and who keep exploding uncontrollably with antisemitic and racist rage well out of the way once a leader is found for the alt-right. Sadly, they are such omega males that no rational senior male politician would stand up for them because he knows that they will disgrace him because they cannot help themselves with their racist and antisemitic potty mouths and then shoot him in the back because they are just a bunch of angry trigger-happy morons who cannot be trusted with guns.
Interestingly, a Jew is doing them the honour of allowing them to air their grievances on his channel even as they mock him and his religion. However, they are beginning to show him more respect now, so his patience with them is paying off.
It is interesting that it is a Jew who is doing this, isn't it?
Asian-Aryanism is just socially conservative Asians getting on with white nationalists better than white men get on with white women. From the 51st minute
If you wake up after casual sex feeling violated, it's not because you were raped. That's your conscience admonishing you for allowing yourself to be used by some stranger who doesn't love you. You consented to, and participated in, your own degradation.
Casual sex doesn't violate consent, but it does violate human dignity. That's why you feel gross the next day. Not because you were raped, but because you allowed yourself to be degraded for the sake of cheap and fleeting pleasure.
Notice all of the people who immediately assume that this tweet is targeted only at women. They really don't understand that men are conscious beings who can also feel regret. It is truly astounding how little the Left comprehends the human condition.
I think consent is pretty simple. If you willingly choose to participate in something, you consent. Feeling pressure or temptation does not negate consent. If it does, then nobody has ever fully consented to any sinful act. https://t.co/DUMY1Jtf2R
Question the wisdom of casual sex and watch how almost every response from the other side consists of them snickering and calling you a virgin. They are so desperate to avoid any notion of sexual morality that discussion of the subject reduces them to corny, adolescent taunting.
Elizabeth Smart is not a gray area. She was kidnapped and repeatedly raped. Clearly not consent. Consent is not nearly as complicated a subject as we pretend. It isn't calculus. If you're forced to do it, you didn't consent. If you volunteer, there is consent. https://t.co/YGgA1XXLbe
Are all white supremacists "heartless, spineless bigots"? Those accused of being white supremacists deny they are supremacist eg @jartaylorhttps://t.co/26j4HW8u6S
If one is a liberal and believes in the liberal principles of freedom of association, one must concede this to white people too. @jartaylorhttps://t.co/26j4HW8u6S
Am I wrong to feel concern for white men, who seem to be in extreme existential pain and have been utterly abandoned by their government? https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
In the same way this childless white Oz woman wishes to protect Afghan migrants, do I similarly wish to protect white men from feminazis? https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
Am I odd in thinking @RichardBSpencer proposals are quite modest and non-threatening? He was just asking for a white reservation, I think. https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
I have met @jartaylor who has been accused of being a white supremacist, which he denies. He is the perfect gentleman, I must say. https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
I don't think even White Supremacists call themselves White Supremacists these days now, do they? They call themselves White Nationalists. https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
It was @jartaylor who pointed out that East Asians have a higher IQ than white people, so how does that make him a White *Supremacist*? https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
White nationalists come in all classes. The uneducated ones will be rough in word and deed, while the educated ones I've met are OK really. https://t.co/EIhV0q9yvf
And my favourite White Nationalist is @AnnCoulter. I would like to be the Ann Coulter of Britain, but I know the UK media won't allow this. https://t.co/kYJBNZj0PI
B4 anyone accuses me of thinking I'm white, I don't, but I do despair at the way white people r going about the business of white advocacy. https://t.co/DD5XFRAOgf
When I listen to a White Nationalist being interviewed I think "Oh, but I wouldn't say that if I were you, why don't you say X instead?" https://t.co/BGuG9zZP3T
I bet I could be an excellent White Advocate without being white, if I were hired for the job, and I would do a better job too. @jartaylorhttps://t.co/QBfsf7Jjfj
Yes, I know it is infuriating, all these non-whites and foreigners muscling in on everything. The last straw must be non-whites muscling in on White Advocacy, but white people should just look upon it as no more than hiring a lawyer.
It has been said that a lawyer who acts for himself has a fool for a client. This is presumably because the lawyer acting for himself will be mostly unable to speak and act impartially and thereby be caught breaking the rules and betraying such bias that it will alienate the court or tribunal, making it find against him.
This exercise would be both entertaining and mutually beneficial, I promise you.
Also, I have said I am prepared to risk prison to make my points and test the boundaries of free speech on behalf of white men. Let's face it, I am the person best able to make my points without disgracing myself, leaking antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism from every pore precisely because I am not antisemitic, Islamophobic or racist. I know I will be accused of being sexist by the feminazis but shall cross that bridge when I get to it. I know my formidable debating skills will see me through and I will have them running for cover, blocking me on social media, begging and demanding Facebook and Twitter that I be banned forever from easily demonstrating their beliefs as false, stupid and evil.
Perhaps in the same way childless white women think Muslim migrants to the West are their babies, I too may have thwarted maternal instincts which may lead me to behave as if White Men were my babies I have an imperative maternal duty to defend. http://www.returnofkings.com/123130/women-who-dont-have-babies-go-crazy
Will I fight for White Men with the same ferocity and focus that childless white feminazis fight for Muslim migrants to come to the West to oust and replace White Men?
