Translate

Showing posts with label Sajid Javid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sajid Javid. Show all posts

Friday, 21 September 2018

Theocracy is better than the principle of parliamentary sovereignty which is the principle of having no principles




JAY'S MANIFESTO FOR HIS FASCIST STATE

1.  One Party Theocracy
2.  Everyone works/contributes.
3.  Anti liberal agenda.
4.  Health, food, exercise, well being nationally regulated.
5.  Slavery for criminals
6.  No medication for depression.
7.  No drugs. Ban alcohol, porn , gambling.
8.  Any woman having child out of wedlock forced abortion.
9.  Ban immigration unless extraordinary.
10.  Any colour or creed fine but the national identity trumps religion.
11.  Would encourage those here from other countries to go back.
12.  Make feminism a crime.


14:30  On having principles, especially moral and relgious principles and rules. People who don't believe in God don't really get principles. When you have a religion, you really get religious principles and understand why they must be followed, if you want to be accepted and identified as a member of your religious group.  Islamophobes are militant atheists united by their hatred of the Abrahamic faiths exhibiting antisemitism and Islamophobia which educated people find repulsive and frightening.

17:00  The YouTube video by the YouTuber who hated Emmet Fox's Sermon on the Mount.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDB0KgDzAYc


23:00  Rules and the Rule of Law.
24:00  The constitutional principle of parliamentary sovereignty is that it makes a principle of having no principles. A theocracy based on the scripture containing the divine laws of an eternal and supreme Abrahamic God based would stop this kind of shit dead in its tracks.


27:00  The purpose of having moral laws is to govern our behaviour towards each other so we remain in existence as a group and maintain social cohesion to avoid the situation of invaders coming into our society and taking over.  Jews were warned against disobeying the laws of God at https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+28&version=NIV They ignored them and got kicked out of their own country by the Romans.

31:00  Rules are made to be broken.

33:00  The Ten Commandments

37:00  I have no time for Catholic guilt.

38:00  Confucius

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/

For Confucius, zhengming does not seem to refer to the ‘rectification of names’ (this is the way the term is most often translated by scholars of the Analects), but instead to rectifying the behavior of people and the social reality so that they correspond to the language with which people identify themselves and describe their roles in society. Confucius believed that this sort of rectification had to begin at the very top of the government, because it was at the top that the discrepancy between names and actualities had originated. If the ruler's behavior is rectified then the people beneath him will follow suit. In a conversation with Ji Kangzi (who had usurped power in Lu), Confucius advised: “If your desire is for good, the people will be good. The moral character of the ruler is the wind; the moral character of those beneath him is the grass. When the wind blows, the grass bends” (Lunyu 12.19).

For Confucius, what characterized superior rulership was the possession of de or ‘virtue.’ Conceived of as a kind of moral power that allows one to win a following without recourse to physical force, such ‘virtue’ also enabled the ruler to maintain good order in his state without troubling himself and by relying on loyal and effective deputies. Confucius claimed that, “He who governs by means of his virtue is, to use an analogy, like the pole-star: it remains in its place while all the lesser stars do homage to it” (Lunyu 2.1). The way to maintain and cultivate such royal ‘virtue’ was through the practice and enactment of li or ‘rituals’—the ceremonies that defined and punctuated the lives of the ancient Chinese aristocracy. These ceremonies encompassed: the sacrificial rites performed at ancestral temples to express humility and thankfulness; the ceremonies of enfeoffment, toasting, and gift exchange that bound together the aristocracy into a complex web of obligation and indebtedness; and the acts of politeness and decorum—such things as bowing and yielding—that identified their performers as gentlemen. In an influential study, Herbert Fingarette argues that the performance of these various ceremonies, when done correctly and sincerely, involves a ‘magical’ quality that underlies the efficacy of royal ‘virtue’ in accomplishing the aims of the ruler.

40:00  The Golden Rule  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule

41:00  Our laws should be in harmony with our chosen moral system. Religions are xamples of a moral system are Judaism, Christianity, Islam etc. Political ideologies such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Communism, Fascism, Nazism etc also come under this category, but political ideologies do not last as long as religions so we might as well choose the most practical and durable ideology available, and I recommend Secular Koranism. Judaism is the most successful of all the Abrahamic faiths because it enabled the Jews to get back their homeland after 2000 years of being without it. Judaism enabled Jews to remain a distinct group even after 2000 years of exile. If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. Jews in Israel would be more likely to have peaceful enjoyment of Israel if Israel became a theocracy because, obviously, God if He exists always intended Israel to be a theocracy, not be a mere colonial outpost of an evil and declining empire.

45:00  Jay submits to Truth, Logic, Morality and perhaps Islam when he says under his dictatorship there would be "No drugs" and he would "ban alcohol, porn , gambling."

55:00 Jay understandably refuses to discuss his mysterious agreement with me on the issue of a one party theocracy contained in his political manifesto because he is still in the course of putting flesh to the skeleton of his idea. But I consider this progress and movement! Yay!

59:00  Jay explains his love-hate relationship with Iceland.

1:06:00 My dream as a keen amateur portrait photographer to one day visit a male prison and take flattering photos of them.

1:12:00  I think I would be quite a cheering bedside presence for the sick and dying.

1:24:00  quran.com/24/2 is better for shaming sluts than forced abortions imposed on unmarried but pregnant women.

1:25:00  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6113879/Unmarried-mother-wins-legal-battle-access-widowed-parents-allowance.html

1:27:00  I am accused of beling a liberal.

1:29:00  Prevention is better than cure.

1:31:00  Should I stay or should I go?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAOiup-Nu8A

1:34:00  Sajid Javid  http://news.ladbrokes.com/politics/sajid-javid-favourite-to-replace-theresa-may-as-pm.html

1:37:00  The inclusivity of white nationalists is their strength
The inclusivity of nationalists would be their strength because, potentially, men of all ages, races and religions who wish to restore the patriarchy, would outnumber, outrank and defeat the men who obviously have no intention or prospect of becoming the fathers of legitimate children and who have never been married. Only men wishing to and capable of fathering the next generation of legitimate children deserve to have their preferences prioritised. White men going on about the colour of their skin as if it were a religion when it cannot possibly be is just embarrassing.

1:38:00  Uncontrolled immigration is resented by citizens of all races. 

1:39:00  People will bond as Jews did with each other when they are attacked and oppressed.
1:40:00  We are all members of different groups and often our membership of these different groups causes conflict. 
1:42:00  Identity politics and how we are statistically more likely to be murdered by someone we have had sex with eg our spouse than with than an illegal immigrant.

1:45:00  We are tired of being lied to by the political establishment. Why do they lie all the time?
1:46:00   The West is suffering from a double whammy of a failed religion and political system.
1:48:00   Slut shaming
1:49:00  I remind Jay of my proposal to go to Aceh, Indonesia to demonstrate the efficacy of slut-shaming.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/01/qanun-jinayat-in-bandar-aceh.html

1:58:00  Voluntary repatriation and banana boats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_boat_(ship)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_boat_(boat)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-O_(The_Banana_Boat_Song)


2:04:00  The fact that you have misbehaving minorities means your rules are not clear.
2:08:00  The rule of law no longer operates in the West.
2:09:00  Underage sex

2:10:00  Gillick Competence

Gillick competence is a term originating in England and is used in medical law to decide whether a child (under 16 years of age) is able to consent to his or her own medical treatment, without the need for parental permission or knowledge. 
The standard is based on the 1985 decision of the House of Lords in Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. The case is binding in England and Wales, and has been adopted to varying extents in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Similar provision is made in Scotland by the Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991. In Northern Ireland, although separate legislation applies, the then Department of Health and Social Services stated that there was no reason to suppose that the House of Lords' decision would not be followed by the Northern Ireland Courts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillick_competence

The Gillick case involved a health departmental circular advising doctors on the contraception of minors (for this purpose, under sixteens). The circular stated that the prescription of contraception was a matter for the doctor's discretion and that they could be prescribed to under sixteens without parental consent. This matter was litigated because an activist, Victoria Gillick (née Gudgeon), ran an active campaign against the policy. Gillick sought a declaration that prescribing contraception was illegal because the doctor would commit an offence of encouraging sex with a minor and that it would be treatment without consent as consent vested in the parent.

The issue before the House of Lords was only whether the minor involved could give consent. "Consent" here was considered in the broad sense of consent to battery or assault: in the absence of patient consent to treatment, a doctor, even if well-intentioned, might be sued/charged.

The House of Lords focused on the issue of consent rather than a notion of 'parental rights' or parental powers. In fact, the court held that 'parental rights' did not exist, other than to safeguard the best interests of a minor. The majority held that in some circumstances a minor could consent to treatment, and that in these circumstances a parent had no power to veto treatment.

Lord Scarman and Lord Fraser proposed slightly different tests (Lord Bridge agreed with both). Lord Scarman's test is generally considered to be the test of 'Gillick competency'. He required that a child could consent if he or she fully understood the medical treatment that is proposed:
As a matter of Law the parental right to determine whether or not their minor child below the age of sixteen will have medical treatment terminates if and when the child achieves sufficient understanding and intelligence to understand fully what is proposed.

— Lord Scarman

The ruling holds particularly significant implications for the legal rights of minor children in England in that it is broader in scope than merely medical consent. It lays down that the authority of parents to make decisions for their minor children is not absolute, but diminishes with the child's evolving maturity. The result of Gillick is that in England today, except in situations that are regulated otherwise by law, the legal right to make a decision on any particular matter concerning the child shifts from the parent to the child when the child reaches sufficient maturity to be capable of making up his or her own mind on the matter requiring decision.

2:15:00  Instead of answering my question on whether he approves of the concept of Gillick Competence, Jay compares me to a pitbull.


2:17:00  Complaining about Muslims is complaining about the symptoms rather than curing the disease. 
2:22:00  Feminism would be eradicated by nationalism. 
2:23:00  The supreme authority and referring to a higher power


2:24:00  Jay finally discusses the PSYCHOLOGY OF VICTIMHOOD
2:26:00  The masculinity of Viktor Orban
2:27:00  Hungary's patriarchy came from its Catholicism
2:28:00  Judaism, theocracy and a permanent solution to the perennial problems of human nature.
2:30:00  Jay accuses me of debating in bad faith about Muslims.
2:34:00  Multiculturalism
2:35:00  I sing about immigration
2:36:00  The Islamophobia conference we attended. They recorded the proceedings, I asked a number of questions, but they that video has never been uploaded.
http://finsburyparkmosque.org/new/2017/11/30/fpm-launches-seminar-series-as-part-of-islamophobia-awareness-month/
2:40:00  Why doesn't the government of white men care about them? 
2:41:00  Christianity and liberal democracy are kaput - there is a big leak in the leaky ship of state that is the West, but white men can't get it together to even think of fixing it.

2:44:00  Dennis Dale video on Guilt by Association  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/freedom-of-isolation.html
2:49:00  Peter Lavelle and The Duran on Kavanaugh https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLCo6vPh9wI and Crosstalk 
2:51:00  The West is a matriarchy and toxic to marriage and family values. The rotten modern culture of the West is increasing illegitimacy all over the world.  https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide
2:53:00  Feminism in Australia where the feminazis are scarier than the ones we have in Up Over
2:57:00  The enemy within, the Yetzer Hara, the Greater Jihad ie the evil inclination  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yetzer_hara

The role of the Yetzer Hara
Midrash (Bereshit Rabbah 9:7) states:

"Without the evil inclination, no one would father a child, build a house, or make a career." 

2:58:00  All five world religions are patriarchies and their cardinal rule is the rule against extramarital sex
2:59:00  To support patriarchy, we must shame sluts
3:00:00  The Romans and the Cult of the Vestal Virgin  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestal_Virgin
3:01:00  Denial
3:02:00  Livy: "We can neither bear our vices nor their cure."
3:04:00  Moses himself did not reach The Promised Land  http://www.aish.com/tp/i/sacks/Why-Was-Moses-Not-Destined-To-Enter-The-Land.html
3:07:00  Liberals already know they are outnumbered. That's why they will now break their own rules in the hope of winning the Culture War.
3:10:00  Jews cannot quite decide whether the Third Temple should be rebuilt because it means restoring failed Temple Judaism and its corruptible priesthood.
3:11:00  No religion, no group identity.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/06/why-we-must-never-lose-sight-of-our.html
3:14:00  http://www.chesterbugle.co.uk/2018/01/03/mccanns-open-childminding-business/
at 18 comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 19 December 2016

Are British values feminine values? Are feminine values in fact feminine vices? Are all virtues masculine? Are all vices feminine?

 











BRITISH VALUES DEFINED BY A FEMINAZI

BRITISH VALUES IN PRACTICE


BRITISH CULTURE CAUSED BY BRITISH VALUES

BRITISH PARENTING CAUSED BY FEMINIST VALUES
  1. British values is the indispensable ingredient for British culture.  
  2. British values is a weasel word for British morality.
  3. British values is a sociological concept because the British men are too embarrassed about discussing morality, knowing they dare not discuss it in case they are accused of hate speech by a feminazi, their jobs lost and their career ended. 
  4. The British are degenerate, and the degenerate find it on the whole difficult to comprehend and define abstract philosophical ideas such as morality, much less discuss them rationally. 
  5. It was decades of unchecked feminism that produced our Idiocracy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N9nVLXMhPc
  6. Are British values Liberal values?
  7. Are Liberal values just policies that encourage sexual liberation?
  8. Are Liberal values feminine values?
  9. Are these feminine values really just feminine vices?
  10. Is the worst feminine vice promiscuity?
  11. Is promiscuity considered the worst feminine vice because it ultimately destroys civilisations? 
  12. Are civilisations destroyed by generations of bad parenting and progressively degenerate offspring?
  13. Are civilisations destroyed by the lowering of general standards of morality and ever lowering educational standards?
  14. Is the Culture of Victimhood a manifestation of another feminine vice?
  15. Is the elevation of victimhood a feminine strategy to prevent men from criticising the behaviour and beliefs of stupid and immoral women?
  16. Are Conservative values masculine values?
  17. Are British men who are Conservative content to let feminazis hijack the concept of British values and stuffing it full of their feminine values which are really feminine vices? 
  18. Have British men even noticed how much their women have feminazified their laws, culture and morality and progressively lowered their status until they are now nothing more than the slaves of sluts?
  19. If not, why not?
  20. Have British men been given some drug that stops them from noticing their lowly status and the high status of women who are mostly sluts?
  21. Have British been hypnotised by feminazis into not noticing what these evil women are doing to their society?
  22. Do British men know the purpose of social cohesion?
  23. The purpose of social cohesion is to protect your society, nation and civilisation from its eternal internal and external enemies by making men prepared to sacrifice life and limb to protect their nation. 
  24. How can that be done when all high status British men are not even prepared to risk their status by discussing morality and how it is linked to widespread bastardy?
  25. British men are now too frightened of each other to discuss such matters with each other frankly and rationally, and this cowardice now extends to senior male British politicians, who must resent their Prime Minister stuffing her cabinet with her mediocre female cronies while marginalising men who are obviously more talented and senior.
  26. How likely are childless atheist transgender gay men to risk life and limb to protect their society compared to a father of legitimate children who loves his wife and family?
  27. How likely are bitter divorced men to defend their estranged ex-wife and children from invaders?
  28. How likely are bitter divorced men who have had his property confiscated and deprived of his children to enjoy the idea of their ex being raped, robbed and murdered by the illegal immigrants these feminazis have so enthusiastically invited in?
  29. Is it the purpose of feminazis to destroy masculinity in order to weaken men and make them even less likely to challenge the feminazification of their society?
  30. Masculinity is a state of mind to do with knowing what their principles are and sticking to them.
  31. Feminists want to make the rules vague and confusing in order to discombobulate men. 
  32. Most men no longer know what principles are, much less what they are for.  
  33. Is the ultimate purpose of feminazis world domination?
  34. Will feminazification only stop when all women are sluts, all mothers are Slut Single Mothers, all children are bastards and all men Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage?
  35. Is feminism evil?
  36. If so, why would anyone want to swear to uphold feminist values unless they are either evil too or stupid?
  37. Should law reflect morality and if so what morality should it reflect?
  38. Is there any other kind of morality other than patriarchal morality? 
  39. The antithesis of patriarchal morality - in essence practising the human tradition of marriage and abiding by its most important rule - is no sex outside marriage. 
  40. Anything that strays from the principle of no sex outside marriage weakens social cohesion. 
  41. Anything that weakens social cohesion must be immoral.
  42. It must be immoral to weaken social cohesion by lowering standards of morality because the purpose of morality is to obtain group solidarity to protect your society, nation and civilisation from its eternal enemies. 
  43. The eternal enemies of society are sluts and socialists.  
  44. Why is feminism (also known as the religion of sluts) and socialism evil?
  45. Feminism and socialism require their adherents to ignore the truth in order to remain feminists or socialists.
  46. The undeniable truth that feminists and socialists are required to ignore is the fact that there are obvious differences between men and women and the way they think, speak and behave, and people are clearly not all equal. 
  47. Feminism and socialism requires its adherents to ignore the warning that the greatest injustice is to treat unequal things equally. 
  48. Egalitarianism -which both feminism and socialism encourage - is a denial of truth.
  49. Any ideology that requires you to deny truth will lead you into error and disaster.
  50. Will the media be discussing any of the points I raised?
  51. Will academia be discussing any of the points I raised?
  52. Will the House be discussing any of the points I raised?
  53. If they do not, does it mean that they are irredeemably corrupt and are now in effect the limbs of the matriarchy and already operated by feminazis and their running dogs?
  54. Is Justine Roberts, founder of Mumsnet and Gransnet, a feminazi?
  55. Is Ian Katz, her husband and editor of BBC Newsnight, a running dog of feminazis?
  56. Is the BBC in effect a mouthpiece of feminazis who both infest it and control it?
  57. Will UKIP leader Paul Nuttall propose the abolition of the licence fee in the UKIP manifesto of 2020?
  58. Will Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton discuss any of the above, or will he be too afraid of his wife - who will soon be his nurse - to do so?
  59. Are feminazis even more evil than neocons who also share their goal of  full spectrum global domination?  
  60. Are neocons and the CIA in effect the running dogs of feminazis?

Common decency saved Britain from falling into Fascism or Communism, according to Philip Blond. Is "common decency" sexual liberation to the extent of condoning underage sex, widespread bastardy, gay marriage, the emasculation of British men and the break-up of the family and no fault divorce as well as totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation compelling the white man to pay obeisance to all the groups protected by the matriarchy, who are now higher in status than him?

The matriarchy being female and hypergamous, consisting of white middle class feminazis, despise all men in the class below them while having successfully emasculated all them men of their own class and the class above them with feminist legislation reinforced by all the feminine tactics of argument and elevated victimhood.

Successful white men can now be easily accused of a historic sexual offence without the need to find them guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a fair trial. Indeed, the accused in such cases has to prove that he did not do it.

Any man who dares challenge the matriarchy can be easily accused. The Directrix of Public Prosecutions is a feminazi herself and so is the Justice Secretary, the Home Secretary and the Prime Ministrix.

British society is breaking up because the Far Right cannot stand being governed by a matriarchy so contemptuous of the preferences of the very angry white beta male.  Radical Muslims cannot stand being governed by a government so clearly prioritising the preferences of the immoral woman and the Slut Single Mother who causes children to be born bastards and the children they have to be badly-parented and variously-fathered. It is really nothing to do with multiculturalism, though of course men always feel a greater hostility towards immigration than women because they feel that their interests are more directly threatened.

While of course the British must have a dominant culture, it must be a genuine that has evolved naturally and which they are all proud of, supported by the law. No one can be proud of their culture if their culture consists of nothing more than the following:

  1. The Culture of Entitlement
  2. The Culture of Excuses
  3. The Culture of Victimhood 
  4. Football culture
  5. Pub Culture
  6. Drug Culture
  7. Rape Culture ie Slut Culture (which includes the Culture of Regret Rape ie falsely accusing men of rape after regretting having had sex with them, sexting and being such a slut your ex exacts his revenge on you by posting revenge porn of you online)
Understandably, observant Jews, devout Christians and Muslims familiar with Koranic principles would know that totalitarian anti-discrimination feminazi legislation are fundamentally antithetical to their patriarchal religious principles. This proposal to make them swear to have their moral principles flouted and marginalised by an oppressive Big Sister government would only intensify the hatred of social conservatives against the feminazis now infesting British government and steel their resolve to defeat them.

Fat feminazi Louise Casey's report on social cohesion was the cause of Sajid Javid's proposal to humiliate migrants who are social conservatives by making them swear to uphold "British Values" as a condition of acquiring British citizenship. British values are in practice really no more than promoting policies of sexual liberation directly damaging to the institutions of marriage and the family. (It is of course the intention of feminists to destroy the Twin Pillars of Patriarchy.) In doing so they destroy Western civilisation, but evil feminazis now in charge of the ship of state don't care and won't be told. Imagine what English values would be like now if they were set in stone in Tudor times and all the subjects of Bloody Mary made to swear to uphold her Catholicism on pain of death, and you will see the fundamental philosophical objection against adopting this proposal. Can a repeat of the Spanish Inquisition be far behind if the matriarchy is not defenestrated before it does even more damage to society?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/18/communities-secretary-sajid-javiddrawn-british-values-loyalty/



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...