THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
If they can't get non-white women, they will get white women, especially white BBC female journalists like the ones at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html, to whinge for more migrants and refugees to come to the West, but it is better if they use non-white women because these women are supposed to represent the nations and races who are the victims of neocon bombing and it is more convincing coming from them.
The best combo is a non-white woman with a cute baby or child tugging at the heart strings of clueless white female voters who feel obliged to display compassion by nagging or threatening white men eg SJWs and white male politicians into taking steps to do so.
Wake up and wise up, nationalists of both sexes.
Don't let these fuckers get away with it any more.
The Big Question on today’s show is: Has Humanitarianism done more harm than good? #bbctbq
— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
.@alanmendoza : Well you can’t drop democracy from the sky I don’t think anyone on this panel would suggest you can #bbctbq
— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
.@alanmendoza : he was developing weapons of mass destruction, that was the justification#bbctbq
— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
. @thephilippics: The WMD were very quickly debunked and they quickly move to a humanitarian rational to go into Iraq #bbctbq
— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
.@o_rutazibwa: There are moment when we shouldn’t even have a debate just go and save the people if we have to.
— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
Have you noticed that the British national interest is never ever discussed?
Why the fuck are we bombing Syria?
Because the neoconning Americans and the "defence" industry want us to and our shit for brains politicians haven't the courage or intelligence to resist them.
Why do we pretend to be surprised that Syrian refugees prefer to go to Europe than head towards Africa when they are fleeing their ravaged country?
Before that question is even asked, the discussion turns towards the plight of the refugees and the sheeple are emotionally bullied into discussing it at great length and then getting precisely nowhere.
The only thing that we are never allowed to discuss is the British national interest and why our MPs always vote for war invasion, bombing and no-fly zones. They must be in the pay of the US neocons and the defence industries, mustn't they?
Or they have shit for brains and vote however their party leader tells them to.
Fuck this shitty system called liberal democracy. Let's just have a one party theocracy instead.
Informed Muslims would know many Western men are pussywhipped manginas, gay or transgender demanding unisex toilets/gender neutral pronouns. https://t.co/AuY35tMNbE
Feminist parenting: slut single mothers raising ill-bred bastards with no respect for their elders and no regard for tradition or morality. https://t.co/lgyw2VOlhy
British values is the indispensable ingredient for British culture.
British values is a weasel word for British morality.
British values is a sociological concept because the British men are too embarrassed about discussing morality, knowing they dare not discuss it in case they are accused of hate speech by a feminazi, their jobs lost and their career ended.
The British are degenerate, and the degenerate find it on the whole difficult to comprehend and define abstract philosophical ideas such as morality, much less discuss them rationally.
Are Liberal values just policies that encourage sexual liberation?
Are Liberal values feminine values?
Are these feminine values really just feminine vices?
Is the worst feminine vice promiscuity?
Is promiscuity considered the worst feminine vice because it ultimately destroys civilisations?
Are civilisations destroyed by generations of bad parenting and progressively degenerate offspring?
Are civilisations destroyed by the lowering of general standards of morality and ever lowering educational standards?
Is the Culture of Victimhood a manifestation of another feminine vice?
Is the elevation of victimhood a feminine strategy to prevent men from criticising the behaviour and beliefs of stupid and immoral women?
Are Conservative values masculine values?
Are British men who are Conservative content to let feminazis hijack the concept of British values and stuffing it full of their feminine values which are really feminine vices?
Have British men even noticed how much their women have feminazified their laws, culture and morality and progressively lowered their status until they are now nothing more than the slaves of sluts?
If not, why not?
Have British men been given some drug that stops them from noticing their lowly status and the high status of women who are mostly sluts?
Have British been hypnotised by feminazis into not noticing what these evil women are doing to their society?
Do British men know the purpose of social cohesion?
The purpose of social cohesion is to protect your society, nation and civilisation from its eternal internal and external enemies by making men prepared to sacrifice life and limb to protect their nation.
How can that be done when all high status British men are not even prepared to risk their status by discussing morality and how it is linked to widespread bastardy?
British men are now too frightened of each other to discuss such matters with each other frankly and rationally, and this cowardice now extends to senior male British politicians, who must resent their Prime Minister stuffing her cabinet with her mediocre female cronies while marginalising men who are obviously more talented and senior.
How likely are childless atheist transgender gay men to risk life and limb to protect their society compared to a father of legitimate children who loves his wife and family?
How likely are bitter divorced men to defend their estranged ex-wife and children from invaders?
How likely are bitter divorced men who have had his property confiscated and deprived of his children to enjoy the idea of their ex being raped, robbed and murdered by the illegal immigrants these feminazis have so enthusiastically invited in?
Is it the purpose of feminazis to destroy masculinity in order to weaken men and make them even less likely to challenge the feminazification of their society?
Masculinity is a state of mind to do with knowing what their principles are and sticking to them.
Feminists want to make the rules vague and confusing in order to discombobulate men.
Most men no longer know what principles are, much less what they are for.
Is the ultimate purpose of feminazis world domination?
Will feminazification only stop when all women are sluts, all mothers are Slut Single Mothers, all children are bastards and all men Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage?
Is feminism evil?
If so, why would anyone want to swear to uphold feminist values unless they are either evil too or stupid?
Should law reflect morality and if so what morality should it reflect?
Is there any other kind of morality other than patriarchal morality?
The antithesis of patriarchal morality - in essence practising the human tradition of marriage and abiding by its most important rule - is no sex outside marriage.
Anything that strays from the principle of no sex outside marriage weakens social cohesion.
Anything that weakens social cohesion must be immoral.
It must be immoral to weaken social cohesion by lowering standards of morality because the purpose of morality is to obtain group solidarity to protect your society, nation and civilisation from its eternal enemies.
The eternal enemies of society are sluts and socialists.
Why is feminism (also known as the religion of sluts) and socialism evil?
Feminism and socialism require their adherents to ignore the truth in order to remain feminists or socialists.
The undeniable truth that feminists and socialists are required to ignore is the fact that there are obvious differences between men and women and the way they think, speak and behave, and people are clearly not all equal.
Feminism and socialism requires its adherents to ignore the warning that the greatest injustice is to treat unequal things equally.
Egalitarianism -which both feminism and socialism encourage - is a denial of truth.
Any ideology that requires you to deny truth will lead you into error and disaster.
Will the media be discussing any of the points I raised?
Will academia be discussing any of the points I raised?
Will the House be discussing any of the points I raised?
If they do not, does it mean that they are irredeemably corrupt and are now in effect the limbs of the matriarchy and already operated by feminazis and their running dogs?
Is Justine Roberts, founder of Mumsnet and Gransnet, a feminazi?
Is Ian Katz, her husband and editor of BBC Newsnight, a running dog of feminazis?
Is the BBC in effect a mouthpiece of feminazis who both infest it and control it?
Will UKIP leader Paul Nuttall propose the abolition of the licence fee in the UKIP manifesto of 2020?
Will Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton discuss any of the above, or will he be too afraid of his wife - who will soon be his nurse - to do so?
Are feminazis even more evil than neocons who also share their goal of full spectrum global domination?
Are neocons and the CIA in effect the running dogs of feminazis?
Common decency saved Britain from falling into Fascism or Communism, according to Philip Blond. Is "common decency" sexual liberation to the extent of condoning underage sex, widespread bastardy, gay marriage, the emasculation of British men and the break-up of the family and no fault divorce as well as totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation compelling the white man to pay obeisance to all the groups protected by the matriarchy, who are now higher in status than him?
The matriarchy being female and hypergamous, consisting of white middle class feminazis, despise all men in the class below them while having successfully emasculated all them men of their own class and the class above them with feminist legislation reinforced by all the feminine tactics of argument and elevated victimhood.
Successful white men can now be easily accused of a historic sexual offence without the need to find them guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a fair trial. Indeed, the accused in such cases has to prove that he did not do it.
Any man who dares challenge the matriarchy can be easily accused. The Directrix of Public Prosecutions is a feminazi herself and so is the Justice Secretary, the Home Secretary and the Prime Ministrix.
British society is breaking up because the Far Right cannot stand being governed by a matriarchy so contemptuous of the preferences of the very angry white beta male. Radical Muslims cannot stand being governed by a government so clearly prioritising the preferences of the immoral woman and the Slut Single Mother who causes children to be born bastards and the children they have to be badly-parented and variously-fathered. It is really nothing to do with multiculturalism, though of course men always feel a greater hostility towards immigration than women because they feel that their interests are more directly threatened.
While of course the British must have a dominant culture, it must be a genuine that has evolved naturally and which they are all proud of, supported by the law. No one can be proud of their culture if their culture consists of nothing more than the following:
The Culture of Entitlement
The Culture of Excuses
The Culture of Victimhood
Football culture
Pub Culture
Drug Culture
Rape Culture ie Slut Culture (which includes the Culture of Regret Rape ie falsely accusing men of rape after regretting having had sex with them, sexting and being such a slut your ex exacts his revenge on you by posting revenge porn of you online)
Understandably, observant Jews, devout Christians and Muslims familiar with Koranic principles would know that totalitarian anti-discrimination feminazi legislation are fundamentally antithetical to their patriarchal religious principles. This proposal to make them swear to have their moral principles flouted and marginalised by an oppressive Big Sister government would only intensify the hatred of social conservatives against the feminazis now infesting British government and steel their resolve to defeat them.
Fat feminazi Louise Casey's report on social cohesion was the cause of Sajid Javid's proposal to humiliate migrants who are social conservatives by making them swear to uphold "British Values" as a condition of acquiring British citizenship. British values are in practice really no more than promoting policies of sexual liberation directly damaging to the institutions of marriage and the family. (It is of course the intention of feminists to destroy the Twin Pillars of Patriarchy.) In doing so they destroy Western civilisation, but evil feminazis now in charge of the ship of state don't care and won't be told. Imagine what English values would be like now if they were set in stone in Tudor times and all the subjects of Bloody Mary made to swear to uphold her Catholicism on pain of death, and you will see the fundamental philosophical objection against adopting this proposal. Can a repeat of the Spanish Inquisition be far behind if the matriarchy is not defenestrated before it does even more damage to society?
Welfare state discourages beta males from working.
Low birth rate causing labour shortage.
Indigenous labour force uncompetitive lazy good for nothings unattractive to employers because of bad parenting and bad schooling which government has refused to address for decades.
Most women stupid hypocritical sluts who want to trick men into a relationship with a woman who is stupid but kind.
Male leader who will pander to the preferences of female voters at the drop of a hat eg David Cameron.
Female leader falling over herself to display feminine compassion at the expense of her own people eg Angela Merkel.
Female-dominated media constantly pumps out sentimental tripe to encourage mass hysteria over eg a photo of a drowned boy giving stupid sluts the opportunity to show their indiscriminate compassion at the expense of men and the long-term national interest.
Where Emotional Fascism exercised by women operates against men.
Simon Sheppard on Emotional Fascism
In a highly feminine environment females can fall into a belief, then an insistence, that their feelings are precious, invariably valid and paramount, while male sensibilities are dismissed as inconsequential. This has been dubbed emotional fascism. 'My emotions are always correct and sacrosanct. Your feelings don't matter. You're only a man."
If you were a healthy young male migrant, you would know that a country whose women are mostly sluts and whose men are all afraid of sluts where even their supposedly anti-immigration politicians cry on cue to pander to their stupid sentimental slut voters without thinking things through would offer you the most sexual and career opportunities.
The BBC and its female journalists are busily selling the interests of their male licence-fee payers down the river and they are still too fucking stupid to get it. There is no one to protect them either. If you think Nigel Farage is going to do anything other than cry on cue for the benefit of the passing female voter you really should have another think coming.
If I were a migrant I would keep on coming and bring all my mates.
I was talking to my parents over the weekend and they were both genuinely concerned about Europe, and they don't even live here. They were concerned about Europe being the Europe they knew and enjoyed on holiday and Europeans staying European.
Even the foreigner is more concerned about European identity than Europeans themselves.
Europe is in the grip of mass hysteria piling up its own funeral pyre while its inhabitants cheer, egged on by the female-dominated media.
The hysteria is induced by white middle class women in control of the European media.
In time these migrants will defenestrate these women in places of influence they have no business being in. Western men are cowed by these harridans but these Muslim migrants will know what to do with them, in time.
Remember the story of The Fisherman and His Wife. Western man is of course the fisherman and the Whore of Babylon is his wife.
Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power - the book every man should read, and every father gift to his son after he loses access to his children and control over his son's upbringing when his wife divorces him under the rules of no fault divorce.
Simon Sheppard:
The Feminine Mind
"While females prefer feelings, intuition and ambiguity, males prefer logic, rationality and precision."
The Fisherman and His Wife
"Females know no limit. They do not check their own behaviour but rely on others to do it for them [like children]. Females make unreasonable demands to test and extend their power. They do not limit the excesses of other females but will exploit whatever gains their excessive behaviour achieves. The answer to the question 'What will women do?' is 'Whatever they can get away with.' Females are never satisfied."
Feminine Influence on the Affairs of Men Dysgenic
"The reality is that modern woman's contribution to progress is minor and what advances there have been relied entirely on systems and technology developed by males. Their net influence is profoundly dysgenic. Western societies are not evolving, but regressing.
White middle class Guardianista females in control of British media
Instincts are the source of emotion and emotion is the ultimate engine of behaviour. What is happiness but the contented satisfaction of our basic desires? But emotions can be manipulated, and human groups vary greatly in their susceptibility to manipulation. Given the existence, if not the prevalence, of false emotions we would be wise to confront our many societal dysfunctions, and particularly to identify their origin, with rational minds and cool heads."
Feminine Hypocrisy
"Females always reduce everything to the personal. Further, females are superficial [and sentimental], because this is consistent with hypocrisy."
Women Have No Sense of Humour
"Females have no sense of humour. Women often define OCC (Our Cosy Circle) by deriding someone they wish to exclude from it. They can discourage true humour because males use it to distribute information and dissipate neurosis, and it is in the female interest to maintain the male in as high a state of neurosis as possible. By disallowing humour on particular themes taboos can be instituted. Then the perception of a topic can be altered to suit unstated goals.
Women Hate Wisdom, Experience and Bald Men
"The modern phenomenon of relatively youthful, physically attractive political leaders, and having a large proportion of the electorate still undecided a few weeks before an election, are both evidence of a feminised society. Other indications are bloated bureaucracies and undue emphasis on avoiding risk. It has been claimed that due to the female vote balding politicians of any stripe are virtually unelectable. The last bald British Prime Minister was Churchill (1951) and no bald American president has been elected sine Eisenhower (1953). An interesting comparison can be made with the practice of some American Indian tribes, who would elect a chief solely on the length of his hair."
Female Neurosis Source of Male Neurosis or Cherchez la Femme
"Elevated female influence results in great emphasis being placed on emotion. Females have not historically inhibited their own or each others' instincts; the male performed this role, and without his influence irrational fears will flourish. A reinforcing cycle of fear will be established. The more latitude the female is allowed, the more her capricious instincts will be expressed, the more she will project her nature onto the male and the more insecure of his intentions she will become.
When males see females unreservedly following their instincts they will want to do the same, indeed the absence of inhibition by females has a pervasive effect which makes male suppression of their impulses an increasingly arduous burden. Males will also find it increasingly difficult not to show their emotions, putting them at a disadvantage in their interactions with females. Of course a man who follows his instincts without self-restraint would very rapidly find himself imprisoned."
Women More Interested in Displaying Indiscriminate Compassion Than Understanding National Affairs
"The ability to logically compartmentalize give the male greater capacity to understand societal dynamics, and the conflicting and complementary forces within it. The female emphasis on personality and her inclination towards familial concerns severely limit her appreciation of national affairs."
Feminazis Have Curtailed Free Speech
"The free and uninhibited interchange of ideas, including discussion of racial and sexual differences, is a prerequisite for a healthy, mature and truly democratic society."
Feminazis Despise Beta Males and Probably Want to Euthanase and Exterminate Them Because They Are Poor, Lower Class, Ugly and Not Sexy
"In a highly feminine environment females can fall into a belief, then an insistence, that their feelings are precious, invariably valid and paramount, while male sensibilities can be dismissed as inconsequential. This has been dubbed emotional fascism."
"Female avoidance of risk means that radical solutions to society's problems will be abhorred, even when such radicalism is necessary. Feminised societies are intrinsically unstable, with the result that large shifts can take place relatively quickly.
1. The super-masculine state [eg ISIS] dominates;
2. The super-feminine state [eg the EU] becomes extinct.
Will the female-dominated media be inviting me for an interview any time soon? I am surely saying something important, urgent and relevant, but of course not. They would want to suppress my ideas and all the men in the media are terrified of a false and malicious accusation of sexual harassment, misogyny, rape or a historic sexual offence that will lose them their jobs, promotions or wives and family. You won't find charming, clever, articulate me in the media any time soon because these women don't want you to see how charming, witty, articulate and clever I can be, because they have no answer to anything I have said and only want to make their men invite migrants into their bedrooms and then leave them to it.
Make no mistake, every time these feminised male politicians accede to their demands they are even more despised by their women than previously. Look at what this bitch Michelle Carter did to this man, and he did it too, just to please her. Time to make sure your male politicians don't become this man, don't you think? Even Nigel Farage cried his crocodile tears over the migrants, so all is lost.
Why do male politicians cry for TV? Because they think female viewers are their mummy while male viewers are quietly being sick. Of course, male politicians count the preferences of their male voters at nothing because they are not part of the capricious and crucial female vote they need to be elected or stay in office, but what woman would respect retard male politicians who think female viewers are their mummy? So now you know why they invite migrants into their country: so they have the chance of having better and more fun "playmates". Democracy is dementia under indiscriminate universal suffrage, and Western civilisation is doomed.
