Translate

Showing posts with label Roger Scruton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roger Scruton. Show all posts

Thursday, 30 January 2020

Jews should declare Christianity idolatrous and non-idolatrous Islam more Noahide than Christianity




0:01  I didn't manage to get the sound of the Aaron "party" stream after all. Apologies. This Neo-Nazi/alt-right house party in Jerusalem has been deleted.

2:00  Aaron Amihud won't let me on his streams because he hates and fears Secular Koranism. If you asked him for a reason, he would pretend it is for reasons of restoring the patriarchy, but that is just nonsense, and restoring the patriarchy does not mean not allowing Claire Khaw - who wants to restore the patriarchy - on your streams. My position is that only Secular Koranism would restore the patriarchy in Western nations and Aaron in his cowardice cannot accept that nor can he argue against it. Christianity is kaput and is in any case idolatrous, so as a Jew Aaron cannot tell Western nations to be more Christian. He knows he is conflicted, and he knows I know he is conflicted and that is the real reason why he bans me from his streams. In fact, I tried to ask him about his views on Chabad's Jew-administered Noahidism, but he ended a stream rather than answer my question, because he feared my forensic questioning. We presented five streams together at his suggestion and you can hear them all at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLiyerKd2Lcq7G082L7Ua182pWqkHNSyp  It seems he gave up trying to demonstrate that Secular Koranism was not viable or moral and wants to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity by excluding me from the conversation, just like liberal media.

4:00 The irony of Jewish Aaron allowing White Nationalists and larping Nazis to take over his stream

6:00  My exchanges with Chabad rabbis on the Noahide laws

8:00  The medium of the written word is more subject to analysis than the spoken word.

10:00  Our religion defines our politics.

11:00  Religion is a standard of behaviour.

12:00  Unprincipled people make society unstable and life unpredictable.

13:00  A political system with a high turnover means the velocity of buck-passing is high and government unaccountable.

14:00  We prefer to deal with people we know and trust.

15:00  We want our leader to be the same person for as long as possible if we already trust him.

16:00  The obvious solution of a one party theocracy

17:00  All political parties should promote the national interest, and nationalism is government in the national interest.

18:00  Wisdom is long-term thinking with a goal in mind, and with the discipline of postponing pleasure, to the extent of waiting until the afterlife to enjoy guilty pleasures.

19:00  Time and energy is wasted in political rallies, making false promises and telling lies in liberal democracies.

20:00  Just govern the country properly already!

21:00  Democracy and Christianity is really stupid so it was always bound to crash and burn anyway. Antisemites attribute the indifference, incompetence and corruption of their governments to Jewish subversion and refuse to believe that their kaput religion that they themselves don't even believe in and the democracy that they now reject for a White Nationalist Dictator were anything less than perfect, until the Jews came along. They are like a householder whose roof is leaking going around beating up other members of the household after falsely accusing them of causing the roof to leak and evicting them rather than calling the roofer. Things will only get worse for the White Man if he does not adopt Secular Koranism pronto. 

22:00  The bloody history of schismatic Christianity and the European Wars of Religion

23:00  People of the same race and religion can be horrid to each other eg European Wars of Religion, War of the Roses, the Highland Clearances, the American Civil War, WW1, WW2,

24:00  The in-fighting of echo chambers and the splintering of echo chambers into mini-echo chambers

25:00  Patriarchy is more likely to endure in a theocracy that promotes patriarchal moral values.

26:00  Even murderers can see the point of laws against homicide.

27:00  The New Testament is not a good enough document to base your theocracy on, but the Koran is. The Torah is far too harsh even for Jews, which is why over the centuries they have interpreted away most of it with the Talmud.

28:00  The defective scripture of Buddhism and Hindus explains why they have never achieved empire. The Chinese government is wise enough not to identify China with Buddhism because it is useless for statecraft. For statecraft, the Chinese government has always used political philosophers operating on legalism. Legalism would have a field day with Secular Koranism and I look forward to the day when I hear the Chinese government proclaiming that it is operating "Secular Koranisim with Chinese characteristics". It is envisaged that there will be many varieties of Secular Koranism eg American, French, Italian, German, Polish, Hungarian, Austrian, Russian, Irish etc and last but not least, one with British characteristics, whatever that will mean by then.

29:00  There is a natural and logical hierarchy of everything.

30:00  The impracticable ideas of the French Revolution

31:00  Egalitarianism is the greatest injustice of treating unequal things equally, but the caste system is too rigid. Secular Koranism will bring about a socially mobile meritocracy that is intended to benefit the traditionally despised lower middle classes.

32:00  A meritocracy logically and necessarily has class mobility and Secular Koranism would bring this about by giving society a formal hierarchy while allowing for class mobility. In practice, Secular Koranism would favour the lower middle classes that have been traditionally despised by those above and below them.  Islamic inheritance rules and freedom of disposition

33:00  The eugenic nature of marriage and how it is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy

34:00  I have been asking white people to take me to their leader for years but nobody can tell me who it is really because the velocity of the buck-passing is increasing  ie the buck was being passed around faster and faster until it is now just a blur. Harry Truman was saying as long ago as the 1950s that the buck stops at the White House, but that didn't happen, did it? Perhaps it is time for America to have a more Chinese political system. This would stop them from being always angry and envious of the Chinese and I think this is what the Chinese are hoping the Americans will do, eventually. Presumably, this is why the Chinese are producing their helpful and tuneful propaganda videos with catchy songs sung in American accents about how China is run so much better with its much cleverer politicians because it just has a much more rational political system run by people who are not completely intellectually crippled through indoctrination by feminism and Political Correctness.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11958034/Chinese-Communist-Party-release-bizarre-English-language-propaganda-music-video-about-their-Five-Year-Plan.html


35:00  The long term national interest, national identity and how history is being taught

36:00  Female masochism

37:00  BBC Radio 4 dumbed down by feminism.

38:00  Perhaps 2020 will be the year my genius is nationally and perhaps internationally acknowledged. This is not just for my own aggrandisement and I am thinking of my dear parents. Currently, they think I am just a crank, so it would be so nice if they could feel proud of me after all they have done for me, having paid for my expensive education.

39:00  Phatic expressions of antisemitism are an emotional release for emasculated and helpless men like OV and his associates who know their matriarchy only wants them to become women and will provide them with the means to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, further morally crippling the men and making it impossible for them to even aspire to become a society of married fathers that is a patriarchy. Make no mistake: a matriarchy is in fact satanic, and, dare I say it, Amalekite. I am not saying they should be exterminated by Jews,  of course. In any case, Jews are only a very small minority of humanity and lack the personnel to do so even if they wanted to.

http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/religions/jews

"As of 2010, there were about 14 million Jews around the world, representing 0.2% of the global population."

The problem is that there is an Amalekite in each of us in the form of the Yetzer Hara, the evil inclination.  It was Muhammad who said that the Greater Jihad is the struggle with oneself.

If Jews have a duty to the gentile, the it must be to denounce Christianity as being kaput, idolatrous and blasphemous to monotheism and to raise the status of Islam by being declared it Noahide-compliant.

My communications with a Chabad Rabbi Michael Schulman https://asknoah.org/wp-content/uploads/rebuttal-of-claims-that-secular-koranism-is-noahide-compliant.pdf have revealed that Chabadniks are not about to endorse Secular Koranism as Noahide-compliant because they are themselves pushing a Jew-administered Noahidism on ex-Christians who are presumably Islamophobic and dim-witted. Indeed, they do not regard Muslims or Islam or the Koran as being Noahide -compliant. The reason they give is that the Koran does not punish idolatry or blasphemy as harshly as Jews ie with the death penalty.

Why would any gentile subject himself to a religion run by rabbis who would execute gentiles for idolatry if they could rather than trust other gentiles to run their society properly without infringing the First Amendment as Secular Koranism is guaranteed to do? One has to wonder at the as yet unplumbed depths of human stupidity.

40:00 Why I like discussing religion with rabbis

41:00  Why is child prostitution not being run by white men but by non-white and foreign gangs?

43:00  Gillick Competence
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/children/

44:00  Condoning underage sex plays into the hands of child prostitution gangs

45:00  If child prostitution gangs were run by white men, Islamophobic white men would be shrugging their shoulders.

46:00  White sex predators work alone because they lack male solidarity having never met their unmarried fathers and were "educated" in their co-ed schools by female teachers. Non-white men tend to come from married parents which means they are more likely to have the male solidarity and male co-operation necessary to share information and resources with each other to run an enterprise, criminal or otherwise.

48:00  No British philosopher will even discuss the definition of masculinity, certainly not the late of Roger Scruton who pointedly refused to discuss feminism with me. Indeed, I recently heard a rumour that he was known to be bisexual. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html While my own morals have not been perfect, I have no difficulty at all discussing what the law should be as regards sexual morality and propose to treat unmarried parents as sex offenders attracting the punishment of quran.com/24/2.

50:00  I define a Christian as someone who has been confirmed. There are not that many of them.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/can-church-regain-its-morality-authority.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

53:00 Safe spaces for men

Sunday, 12 January 2020

Roger Scruton is dead

Does this mean there is a vacancy for Claire Khaw as a Philosopher of National Conservatism?

Conservatism is really about social conservatism.

Social conservatism is about supporting marriage and family values.

Marriage and family values are the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy.

Only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest.

Nationalism is government in the national interest - the only kind of government worth having.

I am a moral and political philosopher with a blueprint for a post-liberal and post-democratic West, prepared to take on all challengers as long as they are prepared to use Truth, Logic and Morality to decide the winner of this debate.

Will my challengers be prepared to discuss the indispensable ingredients of Truth, Logic and Morality?

This is absolutely necessary if we are to go back to basics about the fundamental meaning of important words and build up again the Pyramid of Patriarchy to replace the inverted pyramid of our intersectional matriarchy which is currently spinning on its apex and about to fall on its side, as spinning tops do.

Let us at least have a contingency plan if and when the worst happens. Let us hold Secular Koranism in reserve like a life vest and a lifeboat. In the meantime, let us do the safety drill.

Friday, 9 November 2018

I answer philosophical questions asked of Roger Scruton and Zaid Shakir


4:30  Is religion at the heart of the clash of civilisations? But of course. The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference.


4:40  What is the nature of the deepening crisis between the West and the Muslim world? Muslims are tired of the West kicking them around, installing puppet regimes in their countries and stealing their oil and resources, probably. Not a good idea to murder Muslims and then let them come into your country.


4:56  Should the war on terror be in quotes? It is obviously a metaphor, but Western degenerates find abstract reasoning increasingly difficult as their degeneracy accelerates.


4:58  What is the nature of Islam and of Christianity?  Islam is "Judaism Lite" and in compliance with the Noahide laws while Christianity is absurd and idolatrous because the Doctrine of the Trinity requires Christians to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God which is obviously blasphemous to Jews and Muslims.


5:00  Are Islam and Christianity threats to the other? It is the nature of universalist religions to vie for supremacy.


5:08  Does Islam need to be rescued from extremists? If the West finds certain interpretations of the Koran extremist, then it will have to show these extremist Muslims how it should be done by adopting Islam in the West.


6:44 Christopher Hitchens was a neocon stooge.


8:00  The Archbishop of Canterbury didn't even know he was supposed to believe in the Trinity.  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html



17:00  "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" does not mean sex offenders should not be punished, does it?

What exactly was Scruton's problem with the Book of Joshua? Because it is about war and conquest? This means he fundamentally misunderstands the nature of religion which is to instill morality. The purpose of morality is to keep your group in existence and in good health so it can make successful conquests and land grabs, which is the nature of empire-building. Fancy a Briton not knowing this already!


12:00  The fact that Shakir says he wants America to be Muslim is discussed.


33:00 Shakir challenges neoconservatism. Terrorism is only a poor man's war and there is the Just War concept. If there are just wars, then there must logically and necessarily be just acts of terrorism. No justice, no peace.


37:00  A just way of prosecuting war can be found in the Koran.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/islamethics/war.shtml


41:00 What exactly does Scruton want Muslims to do? Any Muslim can have his or her own interpretation of the Koran. Obviously, whose interpretation will prevail will depend on who wins the argument, or the war.


47:00  The Catholic Church is kaput. There is no prospect of the Catholic Church regaining its moral authority in our lifetimes, even if we were born yesterday. Catholic Ireland fell to gay marriage in 2015. The Anglican Church should be disestablished after Secular Koranism is imposed.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html


Gay marriage - that abomination of abominations - is obviously forbidden by the Bible and the Koran. Muslims have a religious duty to enjoin good and forbid evil. Obviously, what the Koran explicitly forbids is evil, and what the Koran commands is good.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enjoining_good_and_forbidding_wrong


51:00  The question is asked: If Jews can live with secularisation, why not Muslims? Jews are still Jews even if they are bad liberal assimilated Jews because being Jewish also an ethnicity and you cannot change your ethnicity. 


Islam is about principles and practice so if you cannot or do not practice your principles, your Islamic identity is compromised. That is the difference. 


Judaism is in theory far more restrictive than Islam, and Islam is really "Judaism Lite". It represents the second and final attempt to adopt Judaism for gentiles, simultaneously superseding failed Christianity and providing the solution to its failure. Neat, huh?

Tuesday, 21 August 2018

Religion as the basis of the continuation of Jewish and gentile national identity




2:00  The difference between Christian reasoning and Jewish and Muslim reasoning
2:45  Christian values
3:00  Christian values that Baruch finds abhorrent
3:45  Christianity is about saying you believe things which you may not necessarily believe in to be one of the gang, Judaism and Islam is about actually doing things in a rule-based way.
4:30  "The more disturbing aspects of fundamentalist Christianity"  - the threat of hell
8:00  The universal love of Christianity
9:00   Islam is also claims this
9:15   Ditto Judaism
10:00 Eastern religions  are not monotheist at all.
11:00  If you don't believe in the Trinity, you are not Christian
12:00  Justice and Love
14:00  Compassion for the criminal
14:30  The mumsy view of Christianity: forgive everything, tolerate everything
16:00 The idolatry and blasphemy of the Trinity
17:00  Jews are understandably shy of pointing out to Christians the idolatry of Christianity bearing in mind their tradition of persecuting of Jews
17:30  The chaos of Christianity according to Baruch
18:30  Jews and Muslims pray to the ineffable Abrahamic God, while Christians pray to an executed revolutionary or his mum
19:30  God is rather more than the mumsy comforting woman who is your mate's mum that you might bump into at the supermarket
20:00  Shavuot - the cosmic marriage between God and Jews  https://www.huffingtonpost.com/levi-benshmuel/shavuot-love-lessons-from_b_872203.html
The Bible also says this about God: “And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart”  https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A6&version=NIV
23:00  Secular Koranism is just a boring little idea to prop up the patriarchy and deprive you of extramarital sex to continue the existence of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation
26:00  Marriage is a eugenic game of musical chairs being played from generation to generation
27:00  Conservatism
28:00  Gay marriage
29:00  Flexible monogamy is a lower standard than traditional marriage
30:00  John Major's Back to Basics campaign
30:30  The meaninglessness of unprincipled mainstream of Conservatism which brought in gay marriage under a Conservative Prime Minister
32:00  But for Judaism, Jews would not exist.
33:00  Marriage is an institution for all advanced civilisations, not just for the Abrahamic faiths
34:00  The nihilism of atheism and childlessness
35:00  If Baruch had children, he would want to pass on Judaism to his offspring
37:00  The benefit of having a cultural identity imposed on you even if you reject it at the time or subsequently reject it
39:00  Tradition is what we do to please our fathers.
40:00  White nationalists don't even have a cultural identity to reject and now have to go about creating an identity that they can accept and they cannot agree on this. Most are antisemites, many are not even Christian, and those who want to regress into paganism will not have the support of the majority. White nationalism is dead in the water if white nationalists refuse to acknowledge the need to restore the patriarchy and continue to reject the utility of organised religion.
42:00  Spiritual self-transcendence
45:00  Football matches
46:00  Football chants and war cries  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxL24XYFV7w


https://politiikasta.fi/football-chants-war-chants/

47:00  Participating in a Mexican wave at a Madonna concert
49:00  War, good government and foreign policy should be in the natioanal interest, otherwise people would kill and be killed for the ambitions of their corrupt politicians.
51:00  It doesn't profit members of the Armed Forces to think too deeply about foreign policy
53:00 You don't need nationalism to be a good citizen, says Baruch.
54:00 I define nationalism as the ideology of promoting the national interest. This does not mean indscriminate aggression and warfare.
55:00 Secular Koranism and the National Interest
57:00  The nation is the group all of us can join that is big enough to matter and small enough to care.
58:00 Judaism managed to keep a people without land together for 2000 years and enabled them to their return to their homeland. Christianity and Islam represent attempts by the gentile to adapt Judaism for gentiles
59:00  Patriarchy
1:00:00  100 lashes as a means of effective slut-shaming  quran.com/24/2
1:02:00  What are these Conservative principles? Can you find them in the constitution of the Conservative Party? Nope. http://politike.al/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Statuti-i-Partise-Konservatore-Britani.pdf
1:03:00  Ann Widdecombe  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Widdecombe  http://www.annwiddecombe.com/
1:05:00  The Tories and Labour only represent entrenched class interests
1:05:30  The one party state
1:06:00  Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill  https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2010/10/peter-bone-seeks-to-abolish-the-flatterers-cajolers-and-sometime-bullies-that-are-the-party-whips.html
1:09:00 The principle of promoting the national interest would be the primary and officially stated principle of party. Members would have the right to propose policies and criticise party policy on grounds of the national interest and their free speech would be fiercely protected.
1:11:00  The selection process of party representatives administering regions
1:12:00  There will be a committee to decide which policies are permissible or impermissible on grounds of national interest
1:15:00  The NHS
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/nhs-pharmaceutical-companies-access-to-drugs-costing-lives-a7836891.html
1:17:00 The slut-shaming of Secular Koranism  quran.com/24/2
1:18:00  Lifelike baby dolls designed to deter teenagers from having children actually RAISE pregnancy rates
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3758479/Lifelike-baby-dolls-designed-deter-teenagers-having-children-actually-RAISE-pregnancy-rates.html
1:22:00  Public housing and property prices
1:23:00  The banning of usury
1:23:30  20% flat rate income tax   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums
1:26:00  We must not confuse charity with tax
1:27:00  Hedge funds charge a 20% performance fee  https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/11/the-20-percent-club-hedge-fund-stars-of-an-industry-rebound.html
1:30:00  I ignore all the Hadith that contradicts the Koran.
1:31:00  The punishment of stoning/Rajm or capital punishment for adultery is unique in Islamic law in that it conflicts with the Qur'anic prescription for premarital and extramarital sex (zina). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajm
1:33:00  No bedroom police to punish those guilty of fornication.
1:35:00  "Let no man guilty of adultery or fornication marry and but a woman similarly guilty, or an Unbeliever: nor let any but such a man or an Unbeliever marry such a woman: to the Believers such a thing is forbidden."
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=24&verse=3
1:38:00  SSMs  - not all mothers are single mothers, not all single mothers are never married mothers. SSMs are a group within a group within a group. You can only be an SSM if you have illegitimate offspring.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2009/11/3-degrees-of-culpability-in-single.html
1:40:00 Slut-shaming
1:42:00  "Most children growing up are not growing up in single parent families," says Baruch.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html
Out-of-Wedlock Births Rise Worldwide
https://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/out-wedlock-births-rise-worldwide
1:43:00  The current crime wave
"By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. Seventy-two percent of juvenile murderers and 60 percent of rapists come from single-mother homes. Seventy percent of teenage births, dropouts, suicides, runaways, juvenile delinquents, and child murderers involve children raised by single mothers. Girls raised without fathers are more sexually promiscuous and more likely to end up divorced. A 1990 study by the Progressive Policy Institute showed that after controlling for single motherhood, the difference between black and white crime rates disappeared."
http://rightwingnews.com/top-news/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_London
1:47:00  Warnings of 'public health emergency' as violent crime surges
Murders and knife crimes soar in England and Wales as police detection rate hits record low
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/19/knife-crime-up-16-per-cent-england-and-wales
Met Police to stop investigating some 'low-level' crimes in response to £400m funding cuts
Officer warns change could have 'horrendous' impact on victims of offences including burglary and car crime
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/met-police-spending-cuts-400-million-funding-london-crimes-not-investigated-burglary-assault-a8002746.html
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237626056_TO_BELIEVE_OR_NOT_TO_BELIEVE_POLICE_RESPONSES_TO_WOMEN_RAPE_COMPLAINANTS
1:50:00  'Is it her job to give an opinion?' Nigel Farage TEARS INTO Met Police chief over Boris
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1001499/Boris-Johnson-burka-news-Nigel-Farage-Met-Police-commissioner-Theresa-May
1:53:00 Transcript of what I said on the Victoria Derbyshire Show in 2 March 2011
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html
What I propose is already being done
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/02/what-i-propose-is-already-being-done.html
1:58:00  http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=6&verse=151
http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=17&verse=31
2:03:00 The rules of intersectional status acquisition  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-role-of-intersectional-feminism.html
2:05:00  Roger Scruton influenced by Kant.
2:07:00  Pater familias  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pater_familias
2:08:00  Bread and circuses  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses
2:08:30  ISIS are the mercenaries of the West  http://nena-news.it/west-created-islamic-state/

Wednesday, 6 June 2018

Conservatism is "Theocracy Lite"





Dunno about you, but I prefer Bach's French Suites played by Angela Hewitt.






Monday, 19 February 2018

Simon Sheppard says our justice system is now feminine and men should now be very very afraid

How women are now in the key positions of state. Few women have a developed sense of justice, even those in the legal profession.

Theresa May is our female Prime Minister, Amber Rudd is our female Home Secretary, Alison Saunders is our female Director of Public Prosecutions, Chantal Aimee Doerries is Madam Chairman of the Bar Council

Middle class men are too afraid to challenge feminism because they are afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence or of their wives divorcing them and then taking half their stuff and depriving them of their children.

Philip Davies MP who used to make a stand against feminism is now too cucked and afraid to challenge feminism. Can anyone tell me when it was he last made an anti-feminist comment? You can be sure that the feminazi MPs have put the frighteners on him. He also knows that there is no such thing as male solidarity amongst male Tory MPs so if the feminazis get him, there will no masculine call to rally to his aid. Atomised Western men are invariably atheist, unprincipled and cannot think beyond the next election or sexual encounter.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3736022/Tory-MP-slams-militant-feminists-men-pander-nonsense.html

Roger Scruton, Conservative philosopher, is now so old and doddery that he must know that his wife will soon be his nurse so he will understandably refrain from criticising feminism for the sake of domestic harmony. He has already told me his views on feminism is exactly that of Christina Hoff Sommers', no more and no less. (It is a bit like an anti-Semite saying exactly 6 million Jews died in the Holocaust, no more and no less, wouldn't you say?) He also has a son to put through Eton, that school for unprincipled public school cucks. Don't expect him to risk any of that on your behalf, O Oppressed Men of the Matriarchy! Old men lose their testosterone and become old women, afraid to say too much in case their teeth fall out, or if saying anything should make their nurse angry at them and treat them roughly.

Isn't it a delicious irony that I, a female and a foreigner, should presume to care more about oppressed white men oppressed by feminism who are not my father, husband nor son? It must be because I am that rare female with a sense of justice, I suppose. It is probably because I was not born here and had part of my education abroad that made me retain some kind of decency, principle and fighting spirit, for which I only have my parents to thank. I like to think of myself as the little Dutch boy with his finger in the dyke, doing it only because there is no one else around to do it.

https://drboli.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/the-little-dutch-boy-who-saved-holland/

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html

Peter Hitchens: "I'm a feminist, of course I am!"

http://www.radioaryan.com/2018/02/the-daily-nationalist-standing-up-to.html


According to Simon, the subliminal message being promoted by the liberal media is that it is OK for justice to be withheld from people you dislike and even hurt and kill them, especially if you think they are racists.  

Will the West go the way of the Qing Dynasty during the Boxer Rebellion if its massive matriarchal mistakes remain uncorrected?

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/my-afternoon-in-york-with-simon.html

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=5&verse=8

O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm for Allah , witnesses in justice, and do not let the hatred of a people prevent you from being just. Be just; that is nearer to righteousness. And fear Allah ; indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what you do.

Friday, 28 July 2017

Roger Scruton fails to denounce feminism again


Why are Conservatives derided and held in contempt? Because they are represented by dull doddery old coots like Scruton who refuses to criticise feminism and refuse to move aside for younger and bolder philosophers.

If Conservative principles are not defined, then how do people remain Conservative?

16th minute Scruton:

A market in sexual relations is the end of all social coherence.

This point was not picked up at all. How incredibly incompetent and sleepy of Peter Robinson who moved swiftly on to Brexit, who is probably gay.

23rd minute  Scruton on the indigenous working class:

In America as in Britain, the indigenous working class has been put out of mind, even overtly disparaged by the media and the political class. All attempts to give voice to their anxieties over immigration and over the impact on their lives of globalisation and the spread of liberal conceptions of sex, marriage and the family have been dismissed or silenced.
The old traditional working class no longer has that cohesion it had before and it is no longer an identifiable social mass. The liberal establishment has ceased to represent the interests of that class anyway. It represents the interests of the people who say they represented the interests of that class. It is a sell-serving ideology of people who want to appear virtuous without the cost of it. People in the media, the administration and so on who love the image of themselves as defenders of the people who recognise that when in the proximity of the people they feel nothing but repugnance.

Scruton says people are being asked to "deterritorialise" themselves by their own governments.

Peter Robinson:

The indigenous working class has no right to be upset about these liberal conceptions of sex and marriage because they are the one who have embraced them.

Scruton on the sexual morality:

This is the biggest area of temptation and a culture of resistance is needed for the protection of the working class and children who need a father at home who have lost that. Liberal propaganda has made it impossible to say these things unless you don't care what people say about you. The truth has been made unsayable by liberal censorship.

On Trump, Scruton says he won the election on the basis of things that were rightly said. One of the reasons why he was elected is for saying the unsayable. People have been living under a regime of liberal censorship which makes it very hard to say things without being accused of faults like racism, xenophobia which nobody wants to be accused of but those accusations are very easy to make because there is no criteria on which to make them other than the feelings involved."

Scruton on the cancer of our stinking Globalist Matriarchy that is destroying the middle class, the buffer class that functioning capitalist societies must have if capitalism is to survive: 

The expansion of the state to absorb more and more of civil society has happened everywhere, more outside the Anglosphere than inside the Anglosphere. You still have private education if you want it and can afford it. All that free association that made the English-speaking countries great still exist, but there is a tax on it of roughly speaking what you earn which goes to maintain a shadow community of parasites whose only justification is that the pretend to be governing. We belong to an organism that has a cancerous version of itself.

Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.

Bhagavad Gita:

Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.

Saturday, 20 May 2017

Egalitarianism is infantile and based on a polite fiction

Egalitarianism is infantile, but women tend to be sentimental and childish in many ways because it is nature's way of making them better equipped to look after children. Egalitarianism will always be found attractive by the majority of the people who would otherwise find themselves at the bottom of the heap. The twin pressure of the female and proletarian preference for egalitarianism would work to destroy your society if left unchecked, and their work is now almost complete.

The enemies of society are sluts and socialists, who walk hand in hand.

The stupid promiscuous woman and the hungry MCSF/SJW who are her running dogs will insist on her preference being prioritised with no thought for the long term national interest.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

These are the gathering dark forces preparing to wreck Western civilisation, while senior politicians of the West remain in denial and heedless to these warnings.

There are not even elderly intellectuals prepared to discuss this. Roger Scruton the Conservative philosopher refuses to discuss feminism because he fears his wife who will soon be his nurse. As for the media, they were taken over by the feminazis a long long time ago.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html

The obscenity of sex education at 4 will soon be compulsory.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/28/ministers-set-announce-plans-compulsory-sex-education-lessons/

The purpose of this is to entrench the stinking matriarchy, which will continue to bribe and corrupt men until we and our descendants will be the co-equals of bonobo monkeys after becoming the Amalekites the Jews have a religious duty to exterminate.

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/267677/jewish/Wipe-Out-Amalek-Today.htm

Muslims would call the struggle by men against the promiscuous fornicating slut a form of Greater Jihad.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Lesser_vs_Greater_Jihad

We know that the hopelessly corrupt Western political establishment won't touch this subject with a barge pole, not even those who protest against the current incumbents. Even Paul Craig Roberts refuses to consider the role of feminism in the moral corruption and sheer moronic stupidity and the unbelievable insouciance of political life in America and the West.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

No one gets it and no one will discuss it.

E Michael Jones in Libido Dominandi says sexual freedom replaces political freedom.

Whoever controls sexual behaviour controls the state. And he who controls the mores of women controls sexual behaviour. That is the first lesson of sexual politics. He who understands that law understands why pornography and sex education and abortion and the government funding of contraceptives are all non-negotiable conditions for the current regime. Without them, they could not rule.

Feminism rode into town on the coat-tails of egalitarianism. If they are not already extinct or too elderly, perhaps men of the West capable of defending patriarchal moral values will have the sense and courage to have Feminism metaphorically tarred and feathered before running her out of town.

The Bostonians Paying the Excise-Man, 1774 British propaganda print that depicts the tarring and feathering of Boston Commissioner of Customs John Malcolm. This was the second time that Malcolm had been tarred and feathered.

Monday, 19 December 2016

Are British values feminine values? Are feminine values in fact feminine vices? Are all virtues masculine? Are all vices feminine?

 











BRITISH VALUES DEFINED BY A FEMINAZI

BRITISH VALUES IN PRACTICE


BRITISH CULTURE CAUSED BY BRITISH VALUES

BRITISH PARENTING CAUSED BY FEMINIST VALUES
  1. British values is the indispensable ingredient for British culture.  
  2. British values is a weasel word for British morality.
  3. British values is a sociological concept because the British men are too embarrassed about discussing morality, knowing they dare not discuss it in case they are accused of hate speech by a feminazi, their jobs lost and their career ended. 
  4. The British are degenerate, and the degenerate find it on the whole difficult to comprehend and define abstract philosophical ideas such as morality, much less discuss them rationally. 
  5. It was decades of unchecked feminism that produced our Idiocracy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N9nVLXMhPc
  6. Are British values Liberal values?
  7. Are Liberal values just policies that encourage sexual liberation?
  8. Are Liberal values feminine values?
  9. Are these feminine values really just feminine vices?
  10. Is the worst feminine vice promiscuity?
  11. Is promiscuity considered the worst feminine vice because it ultimately destroys civilisations? 
  12. Are civilisations destroyed by generations of bad parenting and progressively degenerate offspring?
  13. Are civilisations destroyed by the lowering of general standards of morality and ever lowering educational standards?
  14. Is the Culture of Victimhood a manifestation of another feminine vice?
  15. Is the elevation of victimhood a feminine strategy to prevent men from criticising the behaviour and beliefs of stupid and immoral women?
  16. Are Conservative values masculine values?
  17. Are British men who are Conservative content to let feminazis hijack the concept of British values and stuffing it full of their feminine values which are really feminine vices? 
  18. Have British men even noticed how much their women have feminazified their laws, culture and morality and progressively lowered their status until they are now nothing more than the slaves of sluts?
  19. If not, why not?
  20. Have British men been given some drug that stops them from noticing their lowly status and the high status of women who are mostly sluts?
  21. Have British been hypnotised by feminazis into not noticing what these evil women are doing to their society?
  22. Do British men know the purpose of social cohesion?
  23. The purpose of social cohesion is to protect your society, nation and civilisation from its eternal internal and external enemies by making men prepared to sacrifice life and limb to protect their nation. 
  24. How can that be done when all high status British men are not even prepared to risk their status by discussing morality and how it is linked to widespread bastardy?
  25. British men are now too frightened of each other to discuss such matters with each other frankly and rationally, and this cowardice now extends to senior male British politicians, who must resent their Prime Minister stuffing her cabinet with her mediocre female cronies while marginalising men who are obviously more talented and senior.
  26. How likely are childless atheist transgender gay men to risk life and limb to protect their society compared to a father of legitimate children who loves his wife and family?
  27. How likely are bitter divorced men to defend their estranged ex-wife and children from invaders?
  28. How likely are bitter divorced men who have had his property confiscated and deprived of his children to enjoy the idea of their ex being raped, robbed and murdered by the illegal immigrants these feminazis have so enthusiastically invited in?
  29. Is it the purpose of feminazis to destroy masculinity in order to weaken men and make them even less likely to challenge the feminazification of their society?
  30. Masculinity is a state of mind to do with knowing what their principles are and sticking to them.
  31. Feminists want to make the rules vague and confusing in order to discombobulate men. 
  32. Most men no longer know what principles are, much less what they are for.  
  33. Is the ultimate purpose of feminazis world domination?
  34. Will feminazification only stop when all women are sluts, all mothers are Slut Single Mothers, all children are bastards and all men Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage?
  35. Is feminism evil?
  36. If so, why would anyone want to swear to uphold feminist values unless they are either evil too or stupid?
  37. Should law reflect morality and if so what morality should it reflect?
  38. Is there any other kind of morality other than patriarchal morality? 
  39. The antithesis of patriarchal morality - in essence practising the human tradition of marriage and abiding by its most important rule - is no sex outside marriage. 
  40. Anything that strays from the principle of no sex outside marriage weakens social cohesion. 
  41. Anything that weakens social cohesion must be immoral.
  42. It must be immoral to weaken social cohesion by lowering standards of morality because the purpose of morality is to obtain group solidarity to protect your society, nation and civilisation from its eternal enemies. 
  43. The eternal enemies of society are sluts and socialists.  
  44. Why is feminism (also known as the religion of sluts) and socialism evil?
  45. Feminism and socialism require their adherents to ignore the truth in order to remain feminists or socialists.
  46. The undeniable truth that feminists and socialists are required to ignore is the fact that there are obvious differences between men and women and the way they think, speak and behave, and people are clearly not all equal. 
  47. Feminism and socialism requires its adherents to ignore the warning that the greatest injustice is to treat unequal things equally. 
  48. Egalitarianism -which both feminism and socialism encourage - is a denial of truth.
  49. Any ideology that requires you to deny truth will lead you into error and disaster.
  50. Will the media be discussing any of the points I raised?
  51. Will academia be discussing any of the points I raised?
  52. Will the House be discussing any of the points I raised?
  53. If they do not, does it mean that they are irredeemably corrupt and are now in effect the limbs of the matriarchy and already operated by feminazis and their running dogs?
  54. Is Justine Roberts, founder of Mumsnet and Gransnet, a feminazi?
  55. Is Ian Katz, her husband and editor of BBC Newsnight, a running dog of feminazis?
  56. Is the BBC in effect a mouthpiece of feminazis who both infest it and control it?
  57. Will UKIP leader Paul Nuttall propose the abolition of the licence fee in the UKIP manifesto of 2020?
  58. Will Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton discuss any of the above, or will he be too afraid of his wife - who will soon be his nurse - to do so?
  59. Are feminazis even more evil than neocons who also share their goal of  full spectrum global domination?  
  60. Are neocons and the CIA in effect the running dogs of feminazis?

Common decency saved Britain from falling into Fascism or Communism, according to Philip Blond. Is "common decency" sexual liberation to the extent of condoning underage sex, widespread bastardy, gay marriage, the emasculation of British men and the break-up of the family and no fault divorce as well as totalitarian thoughtcrime anti-discrimination legislation compelling the white man to pay obeisance to all the groups protected by the matriarchy, who are now higher in status than him?

The matriarchy being female and hypergamous, consisting of white middle class feminazis, despise all men in the class below them while having successfully emasculated all them men of their own class and the class above them with feminist legislation reinforced by all the feminine tactics of argument and elevated victimhood.

Successful white men can now be easily accused of a historic sexual offence without the need to find them guilty beyond reasonable doubt in a fair trial. Indeed, the accused in such cases has to prove that he did not do it.

Any man who dares challenge the matriarchy can be easily accused. The Directrix of Public Prosecutions is a feminazi herself and so is the Justice Secretary, the Home Secretary and the Prime Ministrix.

British society is breaking up because the Far Right cannot stand being governed by a matriarchy so contemptuous of the preferences of the very angry white beta male.  Radical Muslims cannot stand being governed by a government so clearly prioritising the preferences of the immoral woman and the Slut Single Mother who causes children to be born bastards and the children they have to be badly-parented and variously-fathered. It is really nothing to do with multiculturalism, though of course men always feel a greater hostility towards immigration than women because they feel that their interests are more directly threatened.

While of course the British must have a dominant culture, it must be a genuine that has evolved naturally and which they are all proud of, supported by the law. No one can be proud of their culture if their culture consists of nothing more than the following:

  1. The Culture of Entitlement
  2. The Culture of Excuses
  3. The Culture of Victimhood 
  4. Football culture
  5. Pub Culture
  6. Drug Culture
  7. Rape Culture ie Slut Culture (which includes the Culture of Regret Rape ie falsely accusing men of rape after regretting having had sex with them, sexting and being such a slut your ex exacts his revenge on you by posting revenge porn of you online)
Understandably, observant Jews, devout Christians and Muslims familiar with Koranic principles would know that totalitarian anti-discrimination feminazi legislation are fundamentally antithetical to their patriarchal religious principles. This proposal to make them swear to have their moral principles flouted and marginalised by an oppressive Big Sister government would only intensify the hatred of social conservatives against the feminazis now infesting British government and steel their resolve to defeat them.

Fat feminazi Louise Casey's report on social cohesion was the cause of Sajid Javid's proposal to humiliate migrants who are social conservatives by making them swear to uphold "British Values" as a condition of acquiring British citizenship. British values are in practice really no more than promoting policies of sexual liberation directly damaging to the institutions of marriage and the family. (It is of course the intention of feminists to destroy the Twin Pillars of Patriarchy.) In doing so they destroy Western civilisation, but evil feminazis now in charge of the ship of state don't care and won't be told. Imagine what English values would be like now if they were set in stone in Tudor times and all the subjects of Bloody Mary made to swear to uphold her Catholicism on pain of death, and you will see the fundamental philosophical objection against adopting this proposal. Can a repeat of the Spanish Inquisition be far behind if the matriarchy is not defenestrated before it does even more damage to society?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/18/communities-secretary-sajid-javiddrawn-british-values-loyalty/



Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Why do Christians lack the confidence to prevent the death of Christianity?

http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2015/12/goodbye-christianity-hello-multicultural-wasteland.html

I accept that Christianity is dying fast in this country. I know that many schools teach religion badly, if at all, and that ignorance is everywhere. But there is more than one response to this. You could say, as this ‘report’ does, that we should accept that this isn’t a Christian country any more, and adapt it to become a sort of religious salad of all faiths and none.

You could give up trying to teach Christianity as a living faith, and instead get children to study it as a quaint, eccentric curiosity. Or – and the weeks around Christmas are a good time to say this – we could say that we still have a chance to rebuild and restore what has been lost.


Why do we so lack the confidence to do this, and readily abandon a heritage of such power and beauty, which has brought us so much good, for a multicultural wasteland in which a dozen competing faiths squabble in the ruins, and everyone else bows to the neon gods of consumerism?

Because even Christians don't really believe that Christ is the begotten Son of God. Poor old Peter Hitchens. Fancy not knowing that if you don't believe that Jesus is simultaneously God Himself and His Son, you ain't Christian, and only Christians get to heaven.

Even Christians don't believe in this themselves.

Worse, Peter Hitchens doesn't seem to know that he is supposed to believe it. Christianity is more than motets in cathedrals and hymns in churches. The living Christian faith consists of real people who believe in all the nonsense of the Trinity in all its inglorious absurdity, or who are prepared to pretend that they believe it, by constantly repeating "Jesus is Lord," to anyone who will listen.  

These days, even the Archbishop of Canterbury doesn't even know he is supposed to believe in the Trinity.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2014/09/18/the-archbishop-of-canterbury-doubts-existence-of-god-but-hes-certain-about-jesus/

Peter Hitchens and his ilk eg Roger Scruton , Adrian Hilton, Tim Stanley and other Conservative Christians are to be pitied for the following reasons.

  1. They haven't noticed that Britain is as Christian as  skeleton used to be human.
  2. They cannot distinguish between the form and substance of their faith. (The form consists of church buildings, hymns, candles, motets, incense, communion wine, wafer etc and the substance is the belief one is supposed to hold by dint of being Christian. Does Peter Hitchens even believe in the Trinity ie that Jesus is Lord? Who knows? He is just whingeing about shrinking congregations from what I can tell.)
  3. They are right out of ideas and their strategy for survival is to die before the shit hits the fan. 
  4. They expect Muslims to convert to Islam and to believe in a lie they themselves don't even believe in or seem to be aware of.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_view_of_the_Trinity
  5. They still call themselves feminists. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2016/01/why-peter-hitchens-is-all-talk-and-no.html
  6. They are too frightened to even discuss my ideas in unflattering terms, ie challenging feminism, electoral reform and a change of religion as a means of regenerating a clearly degenerate society.  

Monday, 18 January 2016

Why gay men will always be the most effortlessly successful MGTOWs


The reason why MGTOWs keep talking about women is because they still want to fuck them.


The principle idea about being a MGTOW is heterosexual men having sex with sluts and never marrying them.

A slut is a woman who will fornicate with any man not her husband, and that is now most women in the West.

Even if no fault divorce were abolished, MGTOWs still wouldn't be interested in marriage or in having legitimate children.

They would change their behaviour and consider marriage again if

- no-fault divorce were abolished

- fornicating sluts were shamed and lashed 100 times as 24:2 of the Koran prescribes, noticeably and drastically reducing the supply of sluts for MGTOWs. Then these heterosexual men would find themselves faced with the stark choice of having to take a wife or hiring prostitutes for sex, or going gay, which is the cheapest form of sex.

MGTOWs are mainly unmarriageable men and a social phenomenon with a high rate of beta male participation. This social phenomenon is a reaction to feminism and no fault divorce; in essence, it is beta males waking up to the fact that marriage does not give them a good deal if they can still have sex outside marriage. "Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?" sums up their attitude towards women.

The most successful MGTOWs remain gay men, because they don't need to have any sexual dealings with women at all since they don't want to have sex with them, but with each other. Straight women still respect gay men for their lifestyle choice because gay men tend to look better than heterosexual beta males.

What women despise is low status sub-alpha males they find repellent with no dress sense who want to have sex with them.

The Koran also punishes gay men in 4:16, and I believe it is for this reason: because gay men make no biological contribution towards the gene pool for the next generation. Fornicating MGTOWs are punishable under 24:2 because they lower its quality by siring bastards.

Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.

004.016YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

MGTOW Sandman wants to have sex with sex dolls instead of having sex with women. Surrogacy is his preferred route if he wants to have offspring. How dysgenic are his proposals on a scale of 1 to 10?


MARRIAGE, ITS ABSENCE IN THE WEST AND THE PROBLEM THIS CAUSES


1.  Marriage is for the purpose of having legitimate children.



2.  Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions.



3.  The institution of marriage is what distinguishes humans from lower animals. 


4.  Marriage is a delicate mechanism that man tampers with at his peril.

5.  Marriage was never intended for couples who are not contemplating sexual reproduction or do not have the theoretical possibility of sexual reproduction. (It is a sign of alarming degeneracy that leaders of so many democracies cannot and refuse to see this.)

6.  Monogamy is the pivot upon which true gender justice rests. 

7.  Monogamy was created to protect the beta male, who do the work and fight the wars.

8.  Monogamy was created to keep up the morale of the beta male because, if demoralised, he will cease to work, cease to marry and cease to sire more workers and soldiers for society and your civilisation will decline, become a degenerate matriarchy and eventually be overwhelmed by immigrants or threatened with invasion by Islamic State, as is now the case in the West.

9.  Wives were required to promise to be obedient to husbands not because it was considered that they were inferior, but because the arduous undertaking that is marriage had to be somehow sweetened for the man by such promises.  

10.  It is a true sign of degeneracy that no Western man with sufficient status or seniority, not even the men who say they are Conservatives who say they care about defending their civilisation such as Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens can bear to discuss any of the above. This is because they fear persecution by feminazis from the state, from their place of employment and of course within their own family, especially their wives. 

Radical multicultural types will in the end destroy the things they claim to like, because they don't understand that liberty and reasonable equality are features of stable, free, conservative societies based on Christian ideas, which guard their borders and are proud of their civilisation.

The people who really want to defend our enlightened society, in the end, are dinosaurs like me.

This was two days after Peter Hitchens outed himself as a feminist.


11.  Only an alpha male will protect the interests of beta males, but Britain does not have even a single alpha male. David Cameron, who legalised gay marriage, is not an alpha male because he fears what alienating the female vote would do to him and his party. He would never criticise SSMs, because if he did they would go over to Labour at once, because the Left is stuffed with less affluent men who want the price of sex to be reassuringly low. The SSM explained

12.  An alpha male is a man who is not afraid to discuss any of the above because he would know that sluts are lower than him and wouldn't be afraid of them or would know not to show fear by discussing the above in public without fear or favour. The last man who had alpha male aspirations - Keith Joseph - gave a speech in Edgbaston that offended sluts in 1974; his career was destroyed, paving the way for Britain's First Female Prime Minister. 1974 was the year in which the alpha male became extinct in Britain. 

13.  Britain has been without an alpha male for at least 42 years. Can he be brought into existence by an act of will and the will to power, by a man of sufficient seniority and status prepared to discuss the above? Do note that Nigel Farage is planning his TV career after the EU Referendum. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3382294/Nigel-Farage-s-car-wheels-sabotaged-assassination-attempt-Ukip-leader-lost-control-Volvo-wheel-fell-motorway-police-confirm-foul-play.html I rather doubt it because he would have too much to lose. Atheist libtards have no principles and no intention of making sacrifices for any principle they ever claimed to have. 

14.  The only men of sufficient seniority and status are without exception libtards or men like Nigel Farage, Roger Scruton and Peter Hitchens professing to identify with Conservatism, but who have come to an accommodation with the matriarchy. That is why the West is doomed. Islamic State jihadis who have threatened to invade the West and imposing sharia on us are not afraid of offending sluts or of making sacrifices, are they? 

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...