Translate

Showing posts with label anti-feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-feminism. Show all posts

Tuesday, 29 August 2017

My modest proposal for the alt-right and a suggestion for Steve Bannon

The alt-right should now divide itself into:

1) ethno-nationalists some of whom enjoy dressing up as Nazis who want to conduct a pogrom against Jews, Muslims and non-white citizens in the West

Greg Johnson:

The Jewish question is not distinct from ethnonationalism. It is ethnonationalism applied to Jews. Thus no ethnonationalist is entitled to abstain from it. Once one recognizes that Jews are a distinct people, the ethnonationalist solution to the Jewish question is Jewish nationalism, i.e., Zionism.

Of course many White Nationalists have a whole lot more to say about Jews than merely observing that they are a different people. I have argued that the fate of White Nationalism does not depend one way or another on the outcome of historical debates about the holocaust. But I do believe that Jews are not just different from whites, but powerful and malevolent enemies who bear significant responsibility for causing white decline and opposing white renewal.

Some White Nationalists don’t want to hear it. But even so, as I have argued here, they still have to face up to the Jewish question. Because if Jews are nothing more than a distinct people, then ethnonationalists must conclude that Jews belong in their own homeland, not in ours. It is as simple as that.

https://www.counter-currents.com/2015/10/reframing-the-jewish-question/

2) libertarian anti-feminist civic nationalists who reject neoconservatism and neo-liberalism who only want to expel illegal immigrants eg Ann Coulter.

My elegant solution means respectable and reasonable people can join the civic nationalist faction of the alt-right, including Jews, Christians, Muslims and socially conservative non-whites who are already citizens in the West.

Option 2 is probably the only way of saving the Trump presidency peacefully.

The best way of achieving this is to get the alt-right to divide along these lines and then choose a leader to represent the respective factions. I wonder which faction Steve Bannon would like to lead.

Friday, 12 May 2017

What anti-feminist Erin Pizzey said about anti-feminist Claire Khaw. What will Iben Thranholm say?


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1104723266250027/permalink/1298386563550362/?comment_id=1299769223412096&notif_t=group_comment&notif_id=1494489524864920

In response to my post at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/there-are-only-two-kinds-of-morality.html

Erin Pizzey:

You take up the energy we need to fight feminism. You seem desperate for attention which is why you waste our time trying to provoke best to simply ignore her posts everyone.

What the admin of Women Against Feminism Chani Randazzo said about Claire Khaw:

I'm not talking about safe spaces. We certainly don't have to all agree. That's not the issue. The issue is that we're supposed to be talking about the harms of Feminism and what should be done to address it. Women Against Feminism is fundamentally a PR campaign. We cannot get changes in the law unless we convince Feminists, the media and the public of 2 things; firstly that Feminism does not equal equality, and secondly that we oppose Feminism because Feminism is sexism. Journalists come here and see Claire's posts and it taints the entire anti-feminist movement for them. Members of the public who are new to the argument see her posts and leave thinking "oh so this is why we need Feminism".

I want to make sure they understand that we do not endorse Claire's views. She advocates for public floggings of "sluts" - people who have committed victimless crimes.

In short, any group that has Claire as a member loses credibility. Anyone who associates with Claire can expect to never be taken seriously. People in positions of power are unwilling to deal with anyone who is associated with Claire.
I am saying that you are the embodiment of what Feminists and the media say about anti-feminists. They characterise us as misogynists who want to return to a time when women had no rights and were allowed no responsibilities. That is what you promote, Claire. You are a misogynist who wants women to have no rights and be permitted no responsibilities.

I actually believed you were a Feminist trying to deliberately harm the movement by presenting it that way so that no one would take it seriously. Then I realised you'd been doing this for years.

You are a Feminist's best friend.

You believe that women should have no rights. You were arguing here yesterday that women are effectively owned by their husbands. You want to control women's sexuality. The only role you permit for women is breeding mother. This is exactly how Feminism wants to characterise the movement against feminism.

We do not endorse your views. Your views are toxic to the movement against feminism. Your views are toxic to the movement for equality. Feminism is sexism. You are sexist.

What will anti-feminist Iben Thranholm who wrote https://www.rt.com/op-edge/329241-europes-tragedy-merkel-immigration/ and who is also in the group say?



Monday, 9 May 2016

Claire Khaw accused of being a prostitute and a sex offender by Dean Esmay MRA








Monday, 11 February 2013

Widening the appeal of nationalism and anti-feminism


I intend to widen the appeal of nationalism just as it is David Cameron’s intention to widen the appeal of marriage by promoting gay marriage and thereby redefining marriage. Of course, my project is moral, necessary and right while Cameron’s is immoral, unnecessary and wrong.

I believe nationalism as an ideology of promoting the long-term national interest is a coherent, moral and pragmatic ideology that I can sell to other political parties once its racism, Islamophobia and anti-Semitism have been surgically removed.  No sooner has this been said than it is already done, for I am none of the above!  Racially neutral family values (ie I am pro-marriage and anti-feminist) are what I stand for.  How motherhood and apple pie is that?  I like to think my ideas will soon become very popular indeed, when the bottom falls out of the British economy and their are riots in our streets ...

After all, half the voting public ie men would be potential recruits to the destruction of the matriarchy and feminism as a viable and moral ideology.

As for the women, we can ignore the single women and just ask the mothers if they really really want to go to work.  Most of them will say no, I predict.  When that is done we can finally repeal the Equality Act 2010 and return the nation to rationally small and patriarchal government so things can be run properly again, in a one-party state that protects the rights of its members against the leader and his cronies.

Article 4 of the Chinese Communist Party clearly gives more rights to its members than the Conservative Party constitution.  Therefore the British should just swallow their pride and acknowledge the clearly superior rights the Chinese Communist Party constitution would afford them.

The fact that China switched from being communist to capitalist without a bloody revolution should be formally acknowledged too, and credit be given where it is due.

Transition from Communism to Capitalism was cleaner and swifter precisely because the Chinese had a one-party state making this profound change of heart possible, unlike our current crazy system of promoting conflict and division.

The fools and knaves currently in office will unhesitatingly dump what passes for their beliefs without hesitation if they see it is as expedient and rational, and I will tell them what is expedient and rational, when they finally see fit to consult me!

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/claire-khaws-membership-of-conservative.html

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...