Translate

Showing posts with label Erin Pizzey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Erin Pizzey. Show all posts

Thursday, 25 May 2017

Infantilised Beta Male Victims of Feminism (BMVOF) not doing it for themselves


Cassie Jaye asks these Beta Male Victims of Feminism to close their eyes like little children, and they do, willingly infantilising themselves to please her, giggling at all her weak jokes while she reads her speech. Nuff said. 

What would a Real Man - now extinct in the Western world - have done?

He would have put her in her place by asking her why she was talking to them like children.

So, this is the woman whose hand the beta male victims of feminism are eagerly and hungrily eating out of: Cassie Jaye - saviouress of white men - who made The Red Pill. How nauseating to watch grown men abase themselves before her because they think she is so sexy, pretty and young and reminds them of Mary Poppins. They are so grateful to her for condescending to help them and for making so many sacrifices on their behalves.

Look at these pathetic beta male victims of feminism laughing at her every joke and hanging on to her every word, ready to lick her feet like the pathetic self-abnegating dogs they are, hiding under her skirts and enjoying being exactly where they are.

While Muslim terrorists go on suicide missions, beta male victims of feminism in the West are too afraid to challenge feminism as men and men alone.

Men against feminism should tell women against feminism their views don't and won't matter because they can defeat the matriarchy without their support. but if they can't they deserve to lose

Make no mistake, the beta male victims of feminism in the West are so cucked they dare not complain and challenge feminism on their own, but rely on women like Erin Pizzey and Cassie Jaye to be their protectoresses.

Even now these men without masculine pride refuse to take my advice to refuse all the help of these women who condescend to help them, and doing it for themselves WITHOUT ANY WOMEN AT ALL IN THEIR MOVEMENT. Only when these men kick out all the women from MRA and say they will do it for themselves will they get some respect, but this concept is all but incomprehensible to them.

These BMVOF appear to think they can find for themselves in men's rights activism a woman just for them who wants some sort of talking pet prepared to perform the occasional sexual service and take out the rubbish when asked to do so, grateful for a roof over his head and food his belly as well as a special place for him in her bed.

It would appear that women in men's rights activism do so to enjoy being in a position to pity men and thereby elevate their own status in relation to men in general and perhaps over their own husbands. "Look at me helping men!" they might say to their husbands.  "This is my charity work, look at me virtue signal at the expense of your sex. Aren't I clever and virtuous compared to you and your sex? Aren't you and your sex weak, pathetic and pitiable? You better do as I say then."

There is probably a reason why Western women are clamouring for their governments to admit more Muslim migrants. They would rather copulate with migrants who are at least real men prepared to strive and take what they want, than be forced to mate with these milquetoast beta male victims of feminism who do not even have any masculinity to insult.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3802351/Calais-aid-workers-regularly-having-SEX-migrants-Jungle-camp-FEMALE-charity-helpers-likely-sleep-refugee.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Friday, 12 May 2017

What anti-feminist Erin Pizzey said about anti-feminist Claire Khaw. What will Iben Thranholm say?


https://www.facebook.com/groups/1104723266250027/permalink/1298386563550362/?comment_id=1299769223412096&notif_t=group_comment&notif_id=1494489524864920

In response to my post at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/there-are-only-two-kinds-of-morality.html

Erin Pizzey:

You take up the energy we need to fight feminism. You seem desperate for attention which is why you waste our time trying to provoke best to simply ignore her posts everyone.

What the admin of Women Against Feminism Chani Randazzo said about Claire Khaw:

I'm not talking about safe spaces. We certainly don't have to all agree. That's not the issue. The issue is that we're supposed to be talking about the harms of Feminism and what should be done to address it. Women Against Feminism is fundamentally a PR campaign. We cannot get changes in the law unless we convince Feminists, the media and the public of 2 things; firstly that Feminism does not equal equality, and secondly that we oppose Feminism because Feminism is sexism. Journalists come here and see Claire's posts and it taints the entire anti-feminist movement for them. Members of the public who are new to the argument see her posts and leave thinking "oh so this is why we need Feminism".

I want to make sure they understand that we do not endorse Claire's views. She advocates for public floggings of "sluts" - people who have committed victimless crimes.

In short, any group that has Claire as a member loses credibility. Anyone who associates with Claire can expect to never be taken seriously. People in positions of power are unwilling to deal with anyone who is associated with Claire.
I am saying that you are the embodiment of what Feminists and the media say about anti-feminists. They characterise us as misogynists who want to return to a time when women had no rights and were allowed no responsibilities. That is what you promote, Claire. You are a misogynist who wants women to have no rights and be permitted no responsibilities.

I actually believed you were a Feminist trying to deliberately harm the movement by presenting it that way so that no one would take it seriously. Then I realised you'd been doing this for years.

You are a Feminist's best friend.

You believe that women should have no rights. You were arguing here yesterday that women are effectively owned by their husbands. You want to control women's sexuality. The only role you permit for women is breeding mother. This is exactly how Feminism wants to characterise the movement against feminism.

We do not endorse your views. Your views are toxic to the movement against feminism. Your views are toxic to the movement for equality. Feminism is sexism. You are sexist.

What will anti-feminist Iben Thranholm who wrote https://www.rt.com/op-edge/329241-europes-tragedy-merkel-immigration/ and who is also in the group say?



at 1 comment:
Labels: , ,

Sunday, 28 February 2016

London Anti-Feminist Conference in July 2016

https://j4mb.wordpress.com/2016/02/27/join-us-at-the-london-conference/


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 10 December 2014

Beta Males and a Pretty Boy make up the "men's rights movement" too afraid to call themselves antfeminists excited about Pretty Boy's new book telling men not to marry or pay for first date


Stand By Your Manhood by Peter Lloyd
Do buy it and tell me what you think about it.

I haven't read it but already know it is going to be a waste of time.

Esther Vilar's Manipulated Man

Erin Pizzey on 8 December 2014:
Dreadful interview on five live a few minutes.Theresa May is bringing in a new law that will criminalise coercive and controlling behaviour I tried to say that I don't see how this can be possible. If the partner is physically abusive and dangerous they need a safe place to reorganise their lives .but to criminalise bullying as far as I'm concerned is a stretch too far who decides what is bullying and what is not? Apparently the police will have to make that decision.The police are flat-out dealing with endless phone calls from quarrelling couples . This will only add to the senseless burden.there is this monstrous regiment of womenTheresa May Harriet Harman, Yvette Cooper, Patricia Hewitt and Vera Baird who have made their career raging against men. They seem demonising men and fathers as a way to garner votes.

CK: "You should join UKIP, Erin!"

EP: "Don't do politics I trust in God."

 CK: "God helps those who help themselves. If you are going to retire into prayer, perhaps you would like to appoint a successor, Erin? Politics is not really for the prayerful and the senescent, after all.
If you are not up to the job, perhaps you will let someone else do it, with your blessing."

EP: "I don't have a job there is nothing to succeed."

CK: "What do you see as your role in this? And whom would you say is the most effective campaigner against feminism in this country?"

EP: "It isn't a competition Clair I. Think you are being rude and there is no place for rudeness on my Facebook page. All of us are working to a common end. Prayer and the love of God drives my life."

Gerwyn Cox: "She is a troll Erin Pizzey"

CK: I am not interested in competing for the sake of competing, but the situation is worsening while you seem content to marinate in complacency and apparently think nothing more than what you do and your prayers are enough to change things.

What *exactly* are you asking people to do?

Is what you are saying more than just a complaint without offering any solutions?

Then it is not ENOUGH.

Is what Mike Buchanan doing ENOUGH?

Do people not think he is deluded in thinking he and his party with that stupid long name is going to change things?

The only way is to get UKIP to take up this cause but they are not going to because Nigel Farage is a moral coward.

Perhaps you don't really care about changing or doing anything?

I want to actually do something and have a few suggestions.

I am for practical and political action and any movement must begin with a leader.

Is there a leader against feminism in Britain, Erin?

If there is I would like to know who you think he or she is.

What is a troll, Gerwyn? Someone who says things you dislike?"

Stephanie Smith: "Claire Khaw, please at least try to maintain a vague semblance of decorum and stop personally attacking people for not doing what you personally believe should be done. Erin is doing her best, and has been fighting for far longer than you have."

CK: "It is not ENOUGH. How else am I going to bring it to your attention?
Actually, I know none of you really care. You just come here to WHINGE without expecting anyone to do anything, like women wanting a moan and wanting a shoulder to cry on, right?
Is that it then?"

EP: "Clair I am sorry for you -you are a very angry woman after this I am going to block you.we don't behave like this goodbye."

Rob Didcott: "UKIP are not the answer even though they want to be all things to all men and women while not in power."

CK: "UKIP are not the answer even though they want to be all things to all men and women while not in power. "
What is the answer, Rob?
I can tell no one here is interested in solutions, only in whingeing."

Glynis Susan Hunt: "Claire you really are condescending in your manner. You should oh back to the beginning. Erin clearly states she has been in a debate. Something she frequently does to raise the profile of this issue. More to the point why not tell us what you personally are doing to fight your cause."

That is the kind of "constructive" activism you can expect from activists of the *old* school. They know they are going to die soon so they don't give a fuck. Anyway, UKIP would only kick her out and she couldn't bear the indignity of that.

This woman was recently on Womans' Hour. If you are invited on Woman's Hour, then you are one of the girls.

What did EP say on Woman's Hour?

Not much.

Did she even say the word feminism?

NOPE.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04p54yd

Is this fat old woman going to risk saying anything that would make the invitations for her to write the occasional article and appear in the media dry up altogether?

OF COURSE NOT.
But because she has been there forever, she is squatting at the top of the tree pissing and shitting on anyone who thinks she should shape up or ship out and stand aside for someone actually prepared to do something CONSTRUCTIVE.

Fat old women about to die and who have nothing constructive to say except moan and whinge are not going to do much for anyone or anything.

Listen to all the platitudes she and her fans excrete: "we are all working together .. " Crap.

Are they even "working"?

Is posting on Facebook patting each other on the back for their services to mankind with no risk to themselves "working"?

I don't fucking think so.

All anti-feminist movements are made up of fat old dying cunts like her who would hate anyone else to succeed where they have failed.

In many ways it is very BNP and UKIP - elderly people who aren't up to much and don't see why they have to try any harder than they ever tried.

Believe me: if I see anyone who does what I am trying to do better than me I would work with them and help them or stand aside so they can do the job better, but not fat old platitudinous cunts like her, who can't even engage with me on the issues and then deletes and blocks me when it all gets too much for her tired fat old brain.

Antifeminists in Britain:


  1. Fat dying old Erin Pizzey
  2. Angry little beta male Mike Buchanan
  3. Angry (beta male) Harry
  4. Pretty Boy Peter Lloyd
  5. little old  me who is female, foreign but who has alpha male qualities.

There are peripheral groups that are sort of antifeminist like The Marriage Foundation, Family Education Trust and The Conservative [Catholic] Woman, but they do it oh so politely and are consequently suffered to exist but in practice ignored and dismissed.

ISIS are gonna come over and cut all your fucking heads off and make slave girls of your daughters and female descendants.

But hey, I know why you all love and support that fat dying useless old woman: cos she is all you know and you prefer someone you are used to, who is one of you - white, Christian - even though she is fucking USELESS.

She is gonna say her prayers and die and then leave you all to clean up the shit. Not her problem any more, is it, when she pops her clogs?

AN EXAMPLE OF HOW FUCKING USELESS SHE IS

Her next "campaign" is to get  her brain dead retard sycophantic supporters to write to the BBC, woo hoo!

Erin Pizzey on 9 December 2014:

I have just launched a complaint with the BBC on the grounds of bias and inaccurate information. I intend to take this complaint as far as I can. I find it outrageous that the BBC can allow a avowed feminist organisation (women's Aid ) to take part in this programme without providing a balance to demonstrate that both men and women can be equally violent. I think that the BBC and Panorama have discriminated against male victims of domestic violence. 

Please would those of you who agree with me also fill in the BBC complaints on line.


Like the Blibtard Broadcasting Corporation gives a fuck what we think about BBC bias.

Sir Paul Coleridge: how to let a lesbian feminist walk all over you when you are trying to promote marriage and a former High Court Judge

Do you think I can do better?

Why don't you try me and see?

I can only be acknowledged as leader if you acknowledge me as leader.

But if you want to stick to know what you know and be polite then continue to ignore me and listen to the fat old woman who only prays and doesn't do politics, the pretty boys with books to sell and columns to fill for the Guardian and Mail and want to keep their jobs. then keep thinking they are the ones with the answers.

You should know that Fathers4Justice is run by Matt O'Connor's wife and Family Needs Fathers is terrified of losing their funding they will not risk antagonising the feminazis.

Men stitched up LONG AGO by feminazi legislation no political party dares to even talk about

What do you have to do if I am a leader?

Nothing particularly scary - just get UKIP to say they will abolish no fault divorce and repeal the Equality Act 2010 or at least explain why they are too scared to do so: cos they are afraid of alienating the female vote.

When you finally back them into that corner, sweetly suggest that they propose to abolish indiscriminate universal suffrage and promote the principle of no representation without taxation to disenfranchise all the parasitical sluts single mothers and their NEET offspring. I am  not the only who proposes this, for Ian Cowie, a Telegraph journalist, proposes the same thing too at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

I am not going to order you to go over the top, drink Kool Aid or anything like that, just encourage you gently, at first, to do what you already know you should be doing but were too busy "looking after number one" or watching TV, or whatever, to do.

Tycoon driven to suicide by his gold-digger wife. What would you like to do to his ex-wife if you were late tycoon's parents?

Scott Young's death certificate should say DEATH BY GOLD-DIGGER
Tycoon whose death was caused by his gold-digging ex-wife. Not looking too good now, is she?

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 1 July 2014

Why do the women of the men's rights movement dislike me?


Follow · 28 June 
 

Hanging with some of the ladies at the International Conference on Men's Issues. — with Erin Pizzey,Karen Straughan and Dianna Thompson.
LikeLike ·  · Stop Notifications · Share
  • Gene Stevens I want to thank you all for going to Detroit.. I know Erin and Karen who's videos GWW that I watch... I don't know the other ladies.. but I thank you all. You renew my faith in a broken world.
    28 June at 03:33 · Like · 5
  • Elka Zwick I wish that I could have gone.
    28 June at 04:41 · Like · 2
  • Don Saxton Are you eating? It doesn't look like they are feeding you. Shall I send you something?
    28 June at 05:29 · Like · 1
  • Erin Pizzey Imagine finally Teri and I meet face to face. Wonderful moment to meet very real warrior. God bless Teri xx
    28 June at 05:54 · Like · 6
  • Teri C. Stoddard Thank you Erin. That means so much coming from you! 
    28 June at 05:57 · Like · 3
  • Teri C. Stoddard I'll take that as a compliment, Don. I've been losing weight. 
    28 June at 05:58 · Like · 1
  • Rene Hollan Erin Pizzey is more than a great lady: she is a legend.
    28 June at 06:16 · Like · 11
  • Chris Viere You wonderful ladies are making history...again!!! 
    28 June at 08:12 · Like · 4
  • John Wayne McSweeney Is there many men at it? I know this sounds like a silly question but …...
    28 June at 08:41 · Unlike · 2
  • Don Saxton Sorry to miss you all
    28 June at 11:41 · Like · 1
  • John Gormley Claire that is bullshit!

    Men are humans, women are humans.

    Dividing the genders is one of feminists primary goals.

    So having these sparkling ladies here is as far as I personally am concerned a wonderful thing.

    I watched a TV show the other day when a mother was sticking up for her son against a nasty vicious ex-girlfriend.

    She stood her ground like a Mama bear.

    We are in this together sing or swim!
    28 June at 11:47 · Edited · Like · 9
  • Erin Pizzey Clair that is a really ignorant remark. Men and women need to come together to solve the problem of generational family violence. AVFM have always worked with women. This is the best most energised conference I have ever attended.
    28 June at 17:35 · Like · 17
  • Adam Keedwell That and if there weren't any women we all know that this con would be labeled as a women's hating con, taking away rights and all that crap.

    Hard to really argue that point when a good portion of the speakers are women.
    28 June at 18:50 · Like · 4
  • Susan M. Chamberlain Claire... please reflect on your words above, and really think about the absurdity in your written delivery. Nothing speaks out more from those words except ignorance and asinine.
    28 June at 19:39 · Like · 1
  • John Gormley Erin Pizzey my friend you look sparkilng!

    I pray that one day I get the chance to shake your hand and give you a hug1
    28 June at 19:54 · Like · 2
  • Susan M. Chamberlain Fabulous Ladies ... Thank you for your tireless efforts on this issue. Ox
    28 June at 22:50 · Like · 2
  • Richard Foley How do I get in contact with these ladies i need their presence for a conference in Australia this summer. I'm working with a federal senator on family law, domestic violence and gender bias the result of legislative amendments from the EMILY's List faction within the Australian Labor Party. I'm a huge fan of the work that Erin Prizzey has done her wisdom is incredible & her stories at times brings a tear to my eyes. I wish you all the best with your current work over there.
    28 June at 23:35 · Like · 4
  • Philip W. Cook Hi to all of you! So glad Erin finally got to finally meet Teri, Karen, and Dianna! Wish I could have gone and renewed my acquaintance with you all. Glad you all had a good time.
    28 June at 23:47 · Like · 4
  • Deborah Watkins Wish I could have gone!
    29 June at 00:02 · Like · 3
  • Dawn Thomas Oooh, look at all of those heros! I'm so mad I couldn't make it.
    29 June at 04:20 · Like · 1
  • Erin Pizzey The words most people are using about this conference are: I felt I've come home, I am no longer alone, it feels like a family. This is the best most inspired conference I have ever been to. Men and women working side by side sharing a vision that together we can mend the broken places and together we can forge bonds that will take us through all the difficulties that face us.
    29 June at 04:39 · Like · 12
  • Orlin Bojanov Thank you Karen for benign there for us!
    29 June at 05:36 · Like · 1
  • Claire Khaw Have you all agreed on a way forward?
    Yesterday at 13:37 · Like
  • Teri C. Stoddard Claire, I'm not convinced that you have our best interests at heart.
    Yesterday at 16:30 · Like
  • Claire Khaw I have my views about what to do, of course. I think you already know what I recommend: the repeal of all anti-discrimination employment legislation and the abolition of no fault divorce. 

    Did you discuss this at all?

    If not, what you are your proposals for the future?
    Yesterday at 16:50 · Like
  • Erin Pizzey Be there and you can answer your own questions. There will be another conference next year.
    Yesterday at 18:22 · Like · 1
  • Claire Khaw I asked to attend as a speaker, and did not receive a response. I get the impression that I am persona non grata, to be honest.
    Yesterday at 18:23 · Like
  • Teri C. Stoddard I believe that you have a lot to learn before you can be a speaker. Take some time to listen.
    Yesterday at 18:48 · Like
  • Claire Khaw I think you already knew what I was going to say, and you didn't want to hear it.
    21 hours ago · Edited · Like
  • Claire Khaw I don't think you ladies like me at all. What is it, I wonder.
    21 hours ago · Like
  • Erin Pizzey You are right how about listening for a change?
    21 hours ago · Like
  • Claire Khaw What makes you think I haven't listened?
    21 hours ago · Like
  • Claire Khaw Jonathan France, can you work out why the ladies here don't like me?
    21 hours ago · Like
  • Jonathan France I have no right to speak for the ladies Claire. You will have to ask them directly.
    21 hours ago · Edited · Like
  • Claire Khaw They won't tell me.
    21 hours ago · Like
  • Teri C. Stoddard Claire, I get the feeling that you want attention, not that you want to help.
    21 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Claire Khaw I asked a question both you and Erin Pizzey have obviously refused to answer, so yes, I have no trouble in acknowledging that I do want your attention. May I know why you think I may not have your "best interests at heart"?

    Also, when you say "*our* best interests at heart", who do you mean? 

    Do you mean the interests of men? Or do you mean the interests of *women* in the MRM? 

    If one is being accused of something, it is only fair to hear what these accusations are, don't you think?

    This is a rule of law established to protect the accused.
    17 hours ago · Like
  • Claire Khaw I see that one of my comments has been deleted, but not the comments made in response to it. Why this act of censorship?
    17 hours ago · Like
  • Teri C. Stoddard Claire, you assume that I know your stance on things. I know nothing about you. Except that your first comment to my wall offended me, which is why I removed it, you know little about the men's movement, and you come across negatively. At this point, I doubt that you have the best interest of the movement at heart. I could be wrong, but my intuitions are usually right. Show me I'm wrong, or I'm done here.
    12 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Robert F. Donahue Like under the About:Professional Skills ....Feminism ?
    Like that didnt stick right out hahaha
    12 hours ago · Like · 1
  • Claire Khaw I have already stated what I think should be the way forward for MRM:

    "I recommend: the repeal of all anti-discrimination employment legislation and the abolition of no fault divorce."

    What is your view on this?

    I have asked the others at 

    https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/483873895465107456
    Twitter / ntfem: @AVoiceForMen @girlwriteswhat ...
    twitter.com
    Connect with your friends — and other fascinating people. Get in-the-moment upda...See More
    10 hrs · Edited · Like · Remove Preview
  • Claire Khaw I would be interested in Carnell Smith's views too.
    10 hrs · Like
  • Teri C. Stoddard Claire, neither of those ideas are solutions I'm looking for. If you want to know what we want, watch the videos of the conference. You can even watch Carnell.
    10 hrs · Edited · Like
  • Claire Khaw What are the solutions you are looking for? 

    I have watched quite enough of your videos to know that they are all complaints of victimhood offering no solutions. 

    What solutions do YOU propose?

    Carnell was the only male speaker I was impressed with.
    10 hrs · Edited · Like
  • Steven DeLuca Claire Khaw - Teri gave you some good advice, watch some of the videos. Likely you won't because it's obvious you are more interested in bashing Teri. You can bash me now if you wish. I grew up with a twin sister, love her, love my daughter and wife, have always supported women: Teaching self-defense to women and girls, taking care of my son and later my daughter while my wife received her masters, worked with teen girls in Hawaii, abused for the most part. Lived with both genders in a group home for over two years. Helped a friend work on her book about rape... That's getting close to half. But despite that, when I simply share the propaganda that feminists who have PhD
    1 hr · Like
  • Steven DeLuca Excuse me, forgot to share that I have a 100% disability from the army, military duty, hands not as steady as they should be. PhD's in victimhood. I have many feminist friends who are equity feminists. A best friend used to teach women's history but realized she had been brainwashed. Men are good Men protect women and children. Men have been bashed by feminist women in ways that leads to public, health and educational policies that are destroying relationships. So, go Teri, and I wouldn't waste time responding. She has a ways to go before she claims, as my friend that taught women's history, college level, "I am now a victim feminist in remission" Of men that parrot MSinformation from feminists, "They are philosophically castrated by the victim feminist movement." Women that only see Teri as you do are a dime a dozen. Women like Teri that expect equality, fairness, and the same care that MOST men and women give to women to also be extended to our sons and to men, women like Teri, unfortunately are rare, and priceless.
    56 mins · Like · 1
  • Teri C. Stoddard Thank you, Steven. I would like to think that intelligent people could watch the conference videos to learn the solutions. But, maybe you and I are too close to the situation. If solutions were omitted, we'll make sure they're included next year. One idea that I know was mentioned, was joining the groups that were represented, the ones who have shown a track record of success.
    42 mins · Like


I believe my comment deleted by Teri Stodard was to the effect that there should be no women in the MRM. There should be antifeminist women, of course, but they should be segregated by sex. Otherwise, it creates a very bad impression.

Men in the MRM are already perceived as beta-omega losers. For these men to seek to speak only through the permission and encouragement of women is infantile and self-abnegating, like shy little boys needing mamma's encouragement to speak but in the meantime hiding under her skirts. If I were male, I would decline to join such an organisation knowing that doing so would lose me even more status. What real man wants to be associated with a bunch of freaks and losers and the women who want to mother them?

This is the image problem of the MRM, basically.

If men chose, they could take control again just through acting like men, but these beta-omega male losers only seek validation through the permission of their women, which is simply contemptible and embarrassing.


This video interview was just so cringe-worthy and awful I am at a loss for words. Didn't you find Paul Elam laughing at all her unfunny jokes nauseating? Swearing and saying cunt a lot while giggling and being girly is so totally disgusting and weird, I just don't know where to begin.  But Elam thought this was fit for broadcast, probably because she is not unattractive as a woman. When men see a woman they fancy their brains fall out. Elam's certainly has.

When I became aware of the conference it did briefly cross my mind that I should attend.  Indeed, I went so far as to enquire whether I could be one of their speakers.  I did not even receive a response, either through administrative incompetence or perhaps it was the intention of the recipient to ignore me. It is probably their intention not to give me an official reason, so they do not have to explain themselves.

I am aware that Paul Elam is very anxious not to be seen as "traditionalist" and I know that Mike Buchanan once assumed that I was a religious fanatic and refused to accept my denials, but then he is a very angry, charmless little man who cannot see that masculine authority cannot return without men respecting marriage again, and society will not respect marriage again without laws that compel respect, or a religion that instills a belief in a God whose laws should be obeyed. They seem to think it is enough to whinge weakly weekly, while I think something much stronger is required.

As for MRM women, they enjoy the power of Affection Beneath, and don't want me telling them they shouldn't be there.

http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/wfpim.html

Affection Beneath. The underlying mechanism by which caretaking instincts are inspired is Affection Beneath; it is obviously inappropriate to seek to protect something or someone that is more powerful than you. Females seek to monopolize Affection Beneath. The immigrant's [or in this case the beta-omega male's] reduced status (accounting in part for his malleability), which many whites deny but which is plainly apparent to him, is allied to Affection Beneath. All the obstacles which females place in the path of their own males, and they are many, can appear to magically disappear in the case of an immigrant male because of AB. 

Why, then, you will ask, did I ask to attend? I wished to do so only to convey a message, but it turns out I can do it more effectively without the cost and inconvenience of a trip to Detroit.

Compare the pussywhippedness of the beta-omega white Western male and the organisational and martial abilities with the Muslim male jihadist for the Caliphate and you will see why the MRM is a lost cause. I do not want to be one of these middle aged women whose capacious bosoms those pathetic men want to cry into. I actually find such men pitiful and disgusting and my maternal extincts are virtually non-existent. If such a thing is possible, I am a woman with paternal extincts and deplore the fact that someone such as I know how to be a man more than they do. What these women want to do is be seen as their protector in the way so many women enjoy having a helpless creature - especially a disabled child - in their care for a combination of attention-seeking and queue-jumping purposes.  Protecting grown men must make them feel so important and special. These beta-omega males in the MRM clearly prefer a more feminine and feminised men's movement, and the public's knowledge of this will divest the movement of its virility and dignity.  These men clearly don't care, because all they want is the kindness and pity of the women who wish to be kind and pity them the way a child or beggar laps up sympathy, while all I want to do is kick their collective ass, hard.
http://www.channel4.com/news/syria-rebels-jihad-british-foreign-assad

Erin Pizzey and others must feel so threatened by what I am saying, and what I say is that the antifeminist movement should be segregated by sex. That is the reason why they cannot bring themselves to say why they find me so objectionable.

Once that happens, I wonder how many of these women will want to stay in it. The ones who can bring themselves to acknowledge that they only joined to get the adoration and attention of these pathetic loser beta-omega males will not want to be competing with other females in a female-only environment, will they?

The ones who stay after being deprived of male attention will know they are doing it for the right reasons. The ones who leave to find other sources of male attention will know also know why they did it too.

For the avoidance of doubt, I will say again here what I have said elsewhere and what I would have said at the men's rights conference in Detroit, had I been allowed to attend as a speaker:

To cut off both legs of feminism, I recommend the repeal of all anti-discrimination employment legislation and the abolition of no fault divorce. 
at 11 comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

​@WoodStoneAndSteel asks about the lolcows of the world

2:00   Incorrect diagnosis Chaste women 3:00  Political economy Abolishing no fault force 5:00  Socialising 6:00  Disposable relationships 7...