Cherchez la femme to discover the cause of Western Man's neurosis and dementia

I am inviting people to consider whether married women who want to normalise bastardy could be said to be respectable.

Is a woman who does not want to restore the patriarchy and wants to normalise bastardy morally respectable?

Is the woman who does not want to restore the patriarchy a feminist?

Have feminists not declared their intention of destroying the patriarchy?

Is feminism a morally respectable political ideology, or just a disease of the mind that can only be rooted out by slut-shaming as prescribed by quran.com/24/2?

Everything about feminism undermines marriage, does it not?

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, are they not?

All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies, are they not?

Patriarchies are societies that prioritise the preferences of married fathers, are they not?

Matriarchies are societies that prioritise the preferences of unmarried mothers, are they not?

The link between bastardy and criminality is well-established, is it not?

https://rightwingnews.com/top-news/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty

Can someone who prefers her society to remain a degenerate and declining matriarchy of rising crime and widespread bastardy rather than a patriarchy of law and order possibly be morally respectable?

If woman is not morally respectable because she wants to normalise bastardy, then she must be an immoral woman, mustn't she?

Is there any reason at all to not dismiss the views of immoral women who want to normalise bastardy because they want their society to remain a degenerate matriarchy suffering from uncontrolled immigration and rising crime who do not give a damn about the men of their nation because they are now shacked up with an affluent man and are one of the ladies who lunch and want to normalise bastardy?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-22/middle-class-destroyed-50-all-american-workers-make-less-30533-year

Are these women married to affluent and powerful men who want to normalise bastardy invariably the unthinking supporters of neoconservatism and neoliberalism, who cannot be reasoned with?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherchez_la_femme

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

The neurosis of the Western male politician and the migrant crisis

@stephenpollard I was saying the other day that we are a bit like Troy and ISIS a bit like the Greeks, but a citadel we ain't. Disturbing.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard We are being invaded, and all the EU can do is ask its member states how many invaders they will invite into their homes.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard The migrant crisis is the unintended consequence of UK foreign policy. UK citizens are also the victims of UK foreign policy

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Feeble response made against the migrant invasion rooted in the effeminacy of Western man, pandering only to female concerns

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Women are anxious to display feminine compassion unmindful of the consequences. Male politicians pander to them shamelessly.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Time to ask ourselves if indiscriminate universal suffrage is a good thing when so many voters are so heedless and venal?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Western man: absurdly uxorious husband who worships his adulterous wife recklessly borrowing to please her spendthrift ways.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Even now Western governments will pretend to care about migrants when even saying they care will encourage them to come.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard While women are naturally cowardly/hypocritical, why must men pander to them by competing with them in cowardice/hypocrisy?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Like a woman being deliberately ambiguous, Western politicians now so neurotic they r displaying these traits unthinkingly.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard News values are controlled by women. Even now the BBC reports migrant crisis in an emphatically compassionate way.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Like the working classes, women have the vice of being generous with other people's money, in order to appear compassionate.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard The more compassion is being urged on us, the more silent men become, afraid to upset their spoiled and entitled women.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Women now actually expect great sacrifices to be made by men in general just so that they can feel they are good liberals.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard I am a Eurosceptic, but Europhiles should bear in mind that the EU may well collapse under the weight of the migrant crisis.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard What is the point of joining a club/paying its high fees, when anyone from anywhere can just walk in and use its facilities?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard All this talk about imbecile/extremists/lunatics trying to get into power when they have already been in power for decades.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard Do yourself, your readers and this country a favour: buy and read this book at http://t.co/CBRTEJ8CFn

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard How long have male MPs been too afraid of criticising the worst kind of women? Since Keith Joseph's Edgbaston speech 1974.

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

@stephenpollard The Neurotic Western Male http://t.co/NnJME1NDQM Remember when David Cameron said he was terrified of Mumsnet/Woman's Hour?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 2, 2015

Simon Sheppard on Neurotic Suspension

A much simpler, and thus better, example of ‘Bystander Apathy’ occurred at a Rotterdam boating lake on 21 August 1993 (the incident features in The Tyranny of Ambiguity; 1st ed. fn. p. 250, 2nd ed. p. 395). A Moroccan girl, Naima Quaghmiri, 9 years old, fell out of a boat in the middle of the shallow lake and noisily drowned. The other girl in the boat, a year or two older, tried to hold her above the water but failed, while approximately two hundred spectators watched. One of the crowd even made a video recording of it. As in the Kitty Genovese case, subsequent newspaper articles discussed whether witnesses should be legally obliged to act, or punished for failing to do so.

The essential mechanism operating here is Neurotic Suspension: being suspended or frozen in a state of neurotic confusion. (Neurosis is here defined in Pavlovian terms as the stress induced when a single stimulus evokes two or more distinct responses.) Neurotic Suspension appears to be particularly strong when collectively expressed, in common with much other crowd behaviour.

My review of Simon Sheppard's Sex and Power: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sex-Power-Manual-Male-Female-Relations/dp/190124024X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1377715983&sr=8-1&keywords=simon+sheppard+sex+and+power

Simpering BBC female journalists who coo and simper at migrant swarms: @annaholligan @ManveenRana @BethanyBellBB @wburema #migrantcrisis

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) September 14, 2015

BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms