Five forceful steps towards remoralising Britain

1.   Abolish the CSA and require men to maintain only the children of the women they are married to.

2.  Allow a man to reject a child, especially if it is disabled and unviable and if he can prove  it is not his. 

3.   Abolish child benefit and the welfare state. 

4.   Stigmatise the mothers of illegitimate children.

5.   Propose that SSMs be lashed 100 times.  (The Koran prescribes the lashing of adulterers/adulteresses, fornicators and fornicatresses.  I am not even going this far, but what is a Slut Single Mum but a fornicatress?   No further evidence is needed, surely, unless she is claiming it was an Immaculate Conception?  Anyway, Mary managed to get Joseph to marry her so Jesus was in fact legitimate.)

Higher rate of illegitimacy in the UK linked to crap England team

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/soccer/06/24/italy-england-euro-2012.ap/index.html?amp&amp&amp

In football, England is behind Portugal, Spain and Italy.

This is due to the higher rates of illegitimacy in Britain.   That is why we are such useless sluts and bastards who will never amount to anything, and having nothing to look forward to but decline and fall, extinction and death, criminality and barbarism, in a vicious circle of ever lowering standards of education and sport and ever lowering standards of morality ....

But most Britons these days are too stupid to care or too frightened to challenge the feminists.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/truth-about-pommy-bastards-most-births-will-soon-be-out-of-wedlock/2006/02/21/1140284069030.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

Harriet Sergeant does not condemn the causes of crime and gang culture - SLUT SINGLE MUMS

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2163396/A-middle-class-mother-hoodies.html

Titillating photograph of Harriet Sergeant and her boys from the hood gives publicity to her potboiler that does NOT condemn illegitimacy

http://harrietsergeant.com/articles/fixing-broken-britain/

Below is what she says about illegitimacy:

Despite the huge amount of evidence of the harm this causes children (mothers of children on the “at risk” register, for example, are five times more likely to be single teenage mothers), the Labour government made single motherhood an attractive proposition.

Since 1997 a single mother of two children has seen her benefits increase by 85%. We watched the effects of that policy play out on our streets every night last week.

To accuse these young girls of being feckless is unjust. They are merely responding to the economics of the situation. They are as much victims of the crisis in our schools and the perverse influence of benefits as teenage boys. What future is there for a girl who leaves school without a qualification? Whereas boys take to crime, girls get pregnant.

Ministers talk of family breakdown, but there is no family to break down. More than half of single mothers have never lived with a boyfriend. The state has taken over the role of both husband and employer.

Take just one example: single mothers. Mash’s older sister, a single mother of 22, admitted she would love to get married: “But all the men I know are in prison or deal drugs. I don’t know one man with a job.”

Like all the people and organisations she complains about, Harriet Sergeant only proposes to deal with the SYMPTOMS but not the causes, probably because she a dirty rotten feminist IN DENIAL about the causes of crime and gang culture - stupid sluts opening their legs at the drop of a pair of trousers and disdaining to practice effective contraception because they want to progress on the slut ladder of becoming a welfare mum with variously fathered feral bastards which the taxpaying men of Paedo Bastard Britain Fatso Slutland are too limp-dicked to protest.

Harriet Sergeant - tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime?  Not bloody likely.   She is a woman after all, and will probably defend to the death the right of sluts to have babies at the expense of the taxpayer because she is a woman herself.  She has a son, but does she care enough about him to denounce feminism?  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2164185/The-day-Kray-gang-robber-taught-hoodie-crime-doesnt-pay-The-middle-class-mother-befriended-teenage-thugs-dressed-suit-encounter-shocked-core.html

Nope, nothing here either about what to do with scummy slut single mums who breed their verminous spawn who will become the criminals of the next generation.  Not a dicky bird.

Maybe the next one, eh?

Her book is now being serialised in the Mail, so give her a chance.  She may possibly get round to mentioning SLUT SINGLE MUMS which I suspect her feminine feminist sympathies will probably prevent her from criticising.  She probably has quite a few friends who are also slut single mums and she doesn't want to hurt their feelings.  Girls stick together at the expense of boys, even mothers who have sons want to keep all the feminist privileges they have acquired at the expense of men, even if that will fuck up their sons' futures and the future of their own country.

That's shitty stinking fucking evil feminist ideology for you, eh?

If nothing about criticising slut single mums come out in the other parts of her serialised book, perhaps some might think she deserves the fate of Marie Antoinette whom she so strikingly resembles.

Harriet says there is a whole chapter devoted to the subject of single mums in her book, out 12 July.   I will make a point of popping into Waterstone's to see if there is anything at all constructive being proposed about dealing with the causes and consequences of state-sponsored slut single mummery.

http://www.teachit.so/index_htm_files/Wasted.pdf has a book written by Harriet with a chapter devoted to single mums, from page 19.   Nothing was proposed however, about stigmatising these women or even endorsing the Just Say No recommendation of Nadine Dorries MP.

Let us hope the chapter on single mums in her new book is rather more constructive.  Then I will happily eat my words and hat about Harriet being an evil feminist who refuses to criticise the morals of British women just because she is one herself.

I may even attend the book launch, if I am not escorted off the premises by her minders who may consist of members the gang she has been hanging out with.   If so, I may even buy a copy and ask her to to dedicate it 'To Claire "Robespierre" Khaw, With love and best wishes from Harriet "Marie Antoinette" Sergeant'

When Enoch Powell talked about a nation busily engaged in heaping up their own funeral pyre, he didn't know the half of it.  

Degenerate British government pays Slut Single Mums £100 to take parenting classes when it should be proposing to lash them 100 times

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2012/05/cameron-launches-advice-service-to-new-parents-covering-everything-from-teething-to-tantrums.html

The government does not appear to realise that prevention is better than cure.  Far cheaper would be to propose the lashing of Slut Single Mums 100 times (as instructed by the Koran) and the threat to sell any badly brought up children as slaves to China, together with their useless degenerate parents, thus boosting British exports.  In fact, the British could start exporting their Slut Single Mums just like in the good old days when they sold opium to the Chinese, in order to destroy their civilisation.

100 lashes instead of £100 would stop Slut Single Mums producing yet more variously-fathered feral criminal rioting bastards.

Government prefers to blame social networks rather than SSMs for riots, threatening free speech

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/tv-social-media-fuelled-london-riots/20120328.htm

We know who is in power by those we cannot criticise, and we cannot criticise Slut Single Mums.

Instead, the "independent" panel headed by Darra Singh says social networks are to blame.  Guess what sort of effect that would have on our free speech?

What a shame that the BNP will not be backing me on this, but then Nick Griffin never backs a good nationalist cause if it is not about the glorification of himself, does he?.

There could be an online campaign by the BNP to challenge the arrogant and assumed Orwell Prize Left Liberal bias against even considering my entry because of my nationalist associations. Suzanne Moore seems to think that my attempt to question the integrity of the Orwell Prize is as futile as it is to question the right of rain to fall.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/suzanne-moore-judge-for-orwell-prize.html

Oh, but wait, a young white man was imprisoned yesterday for 56 days for tweeting offensively about a black football player who was taken ill.

What a shame Nick Griffin has also blocked me from following him on Twitter, presumably to show his disapproval of all I say and do and to dissociate himself from me.  I wonder what he is afraid of.

There also seems to be a concerted attempt to marginalise and traduce me as an informant over the weekend.  I was supposed to have divulged the venue of the 24 March London Forum meeting to Hope Not Hate.  This is so even when the organiser Jez Turner knows that he at no time told me the venue before he informed me that I was to stay away from the meeting "pending investigations".

In a way I welcome such frenzied attacks from nationalists.  This would suggest that they think I am getting too powerful and must be crushed before I take over the entire movement, which is actually rather flattering.

Just imagine - all these scary Nazi Fascist Racist extremists apparently afraid of little old me!

Perhaps Nick Griffin is afraid of the fact that even the most racial of nationalists know that my intentions are honourable and that I am prepared to stick my neck out to say the things that need to be said, while they quiver and quake at the sidelines, with the exception of David Jones.  David Jones is a leading member of British People's Party http://www.bpp.org.uk/ who are hardline ethno-nationalists, as a quick glance at their policies will demonstrate.

He has hinted that he may be prepared to work with me.  We are after all the perfect combination of

• town and country
• man and woman
• north and south
• the minutiae of local politics and the structured construction of nationalist ideology
• ethno nationalism and civic nationalism

British nationalism as it stands is an ideological vacuum, and we know that Nature abhors a vacuum.

It appears that only I have the ideas and the determination to redefine nationalism in a racially neutral way that favours all who have the work ethic (and by this I include all Asian shopkeepers who are socially conservative and hate the very idea of gay marriage), especially those who reject the statist policies of our so-called liberal establishment and their myriad thoughtcrime and hate-speech laws.

https://www.facebook.com/OfficialNickGriffin shows Nick Griffin determined not to tweet about whether Liam Stacey deserves a 56 day imprisonment.  Is the reason for this cowardice, ignorance or sloth?  Who knows.

Is the BNP these days fit for the purposes of challenging the policies of the liberal establishment?  Is Nick Griffin fit to lead it?  I would say no to both.

If you back me, there is just a chance we can absorb both the BNP and UKIP by the next election.

If you do not, then clearly you and I are precisely nothing and will remain precisely nothing, until the LibLabCon completely destroys the country with its demented policies and its hypocrisy and cowardice while the divided parties who oppose them knock six bells out of each other.

Your choice.

Your choice to help me form a party that is not afraid to challenge the status quo with all my strength and spirit.

Back me if you want to see change in your lifetime.   The liberal establishment is now rotten to the core and only I know how to play the system and win, even under their rules.

I will show you that it is possible to be both a Nationalist and a Libertarian.  It is my considered view that fewer laws and lower taxes are in the long term national interest.

Why I do what I do

I received this from a Mike Mosley on 21 September 2011:

"Dear Claire, No disrespect,but you arent indegenous British at all.I suggest you remove yourself from British Nationalism as we dont want you and dont want you in our country.Go and join the ying tong ying tong slant eyed party.U r not British..u r not English..go and support youre own Race! 14/88 !"

Fortunately for me, I do not actually expect gratitude from these people. I know they would hate me even more if I espouse the cause of British nationalism better than the indigenous British themselves. The only thing left for the WWC is to think they really are better and that the colour of their skin makes them by definition superior, because they have nothing else to recommend them. They are after all despised by even those who are supposed to help them - ie the Labour Party.

Not just despised, but FEARED and HATED, because people hate those whom they have wronged, and successive governments have clearly failed the WWC.

The fact that the WWC is now unfit for purpose is the result of decades of a toxic education policy that taught the people born in this country who should be doing unskilled manual labour nothing except their rights and their right to reproduce illegitimately at taxpayers' expense, while neglecting the 3 Rs and moral education.

Moral education is precisely the sort of thing that would make the liberal establishment fall about laughing, and that is why they have so thoroughly and carefully dismantled all the means by which it is possible for moral education to be transmitted, eg a religion that is fit for purpose (which the Church of England ain't), married parents living together, discipline in schools, or even silence in class.

Morality for the liberal is about paying more tax in the name of the environment, healthy eating, being sentimental about animals and tolerating all that is destructive to your race, culture and your nation and being compassionate to criminals who do not deserve it and are only going to do it again and worse.  

The widespread illegitimacy amongst the WWC would tend to prevent them from learning any manners and make them so unattractive as employees that their own race shuns them.

No party will fix education because it is such a mess that it would take more than a term of government to fix - with strikes, disruptions so numerous as to make the government so unpopular that it would not gain a second term.

And so education is always swept under the carpet and tinkered about at the edges that nothing is fixed but gets progressively (pun intended) dumbed down until school leavers leave school barely able to read and write and count, and universities churn out at taxpayers' expense hordes of unemployable graduates.

This problem cannot and will not be fixed under the current party system.

No politician who knows the precarious of his position under a such a system will ever have the courage to do anything bold or propose anything radical, because he knows he will not get the support he knows he will need to push through such radical reforms.

Therefore all that would happen is that the government continues to sweep long-standing problems under the carpet, in the name of expediency, while things get progressively (pun intended) worse.

When I propose a one-party state with the necessary safeguards (such as Peter Bone's House of Commons Disqualification Bill
http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_commons/newsid_9096000/9096136.stm  which only a handful of MPs dare support), people with the education and intellect to understand what I am going on about blanch, because I am of course proposing something RADICAL and UNPOPULAR, breaching yet another liberal TABOO.

So they pretend not to understand what I am saying because, if they showed any understanding of this, they would know what they must do, which is to AGREE with me and then say the same thing to others, which would incur the mockery and derision that they are so anxious to avoid, for these people in the BNP have been very much mocked and derided and don't want any more of that.

They want to be safe and they want to be respectable.  That is the thing they crave, and they want their own race to be grateful, but they are not, for they are regarded as an embarrassment to the white race, being marginalised, needy, uneducated, coarse and racially inferior even to the blacks who come here and look down their noses at the white working classes, now so depraved and degenerate that most of them no longer work and those who want to work are not given jobs, because British employers prefer foreigners who are cheaper and better.

Sadly, however, the BNP do not in any way suggest that the culture and the morals of the WWC are in any way to blame, because it is just easier to blame the government, the liberals, the immigrants, especially the Muslims.

Muslims, because of their religion, react more noticeably to this manifestation of WWC degeneracy and wish to dissociate themselves from them, and this they can only do by doing things differently - on purpose - to what they see the WWC around them are doing.

The more WWC women expose flaunt their bodies in public, the more covered up the Muslim women will get.

The more white men wear pink shirts as an expression of their submission to the matriarchy, the more Muslim men will wish to show their masculinity and beat up white homosexuals in the East End to show them who's better, stronger and not contemptibly degenerate.

The more liberals promote homosexuality, the more Muslims will wish to do the opposite.

The Muslims know that all they have to do is wait to take over while the liberalism shoots itself in its foot, gorges itself on spiritual and moral toxins while refusing to admit that there is anything wrong with anything that they do.

Seeing that their society has so sexually liberated itself, the BNP cannot now even bring itself to condemn the Slut Single Mother, because most of their members were singly-parented or are singly-parenting, and they don't want to give offence in this morbidly feminised and easily offended nation.

The BNP has liberalised and now has homosexuals, Jews and non-white members, and is even chasing the female vote - just like the LibLabCon - because having women at their meetings give them an air of respectability and of social inclusion that they so desperately crave.

And so the BNP acknowledges the supremacy of the matriarchy though it is actually the matriarchy which has marginalised them and wronged them.

They are licking the stilettos of the boot that has been kicking them for so many decades, but do not mind or perhaps they do not notice.

What can you do with a man who does not care when you tell him that he is poisoning himself, who actually prefers the poison to the cure?

Even ex-BNP members - who have been chewed up and spat out by the party - dare not question the supremacy of the matriarchy and have no intention of criticising the white women who make poor reproductive choices and who bring up the next generation of degenerate criminals, unemployable NEETs who are a disgrace to their race and the disabled who are a burden on the taxpayer?

Even as they acknowledge silently that I am the only  one with solutions and the integrity, they cannot bring themselves to acknowledge me as leadership material or to support me openly, because they fear the mockery of their comrades and expulsion from their social club.  I call the BNP a social club, for I think calling it a political party perhaps dignifies it too much.

They are the social club for the marginalised and ignored who practice occupational therapy.  Politics is after all the business of selling hope, even when it is really hopeless, and it certainly is hopeless the way they are carrying on.

Even as they find themselves acknowledging silently that I am bolder and run faster than any of them in seeking out the liberal enemy relentlessly, they tell me that the party is not ready for my ideas.   But the real reason is that they cannot be seen to be acknowledging a foreign female as their leader, who can see to it that their party goes from strength to strength on established principles of civic nationalism rather than lurching from expediency to disaster to apathy and to extinction, because that would be just too shameful.

I can only assure them that I will step aside the moment anyone else better comes along to do it.  The duty of any leader is to find a successor as soon as possible.

Being the racists and the cowards that I know some of them to be, they will continue to prefer the weeds of ethno-nationalism to the fruits of CIVIC NATIONAL SOCIALISM.

I have not been successful, they will say to each other.  But I am only unsuccessful BECAUSE they will not support me and prefer to think that they know better, even though, in their heart of hearts they know they do not.

And so it is up to them to take the necessary steps and make enquiries of my plans and intentions, and clarify anything they do not quite understand or feel uneasy about, but I am sure I will receive no such enquiries, because they prefer not to think too much about these things - even the ones with the education and intellect to do so - for they prefer to immerse themselves in their leafleting and their paper sales, rather than find themselves being in the position of having to take a decision that would incur the wrath and mockery of the members of their social club.

Why do I do this when what I do is actually resented by the worst of them?

It has been said that politics is a calling and a calling is something that one feels compelled to do, even when it brings one no material gain and no emotional comforts.

If one wants gratitude in politics, one should get a dog, and I have no intention of getting a dog.

I only do it because there doesn't appear to be anyone else around prepared to point out the obvious, without finding himself forced into apologising abjectedly for telling the truth on pain of losing his job or being thrown into prison without trial and their children sent into care, like Emma West.

I only do it because no one else appears to understand the principle of free speech any more.

I only do it because I believe I know better than most how to act on principle.

I only do it because there is no one else around who wishes to do it and who could do it, even if they wanted to.

I only do it because I do not care if I am loved, only that I am right, and do not mind if I don't get proven right in my lifetime.    

If I accomplish NOTHING at all, I will have proved that in the West, liberals no longer believe in free speech - upon which the entire basis of liberalism rests.  They are like the Romans who started off by hating kings and ended up worshipping their emperors, but shorter-lived.

Perversely, or should I say logically, I regard criticism and vilification by my enemies as a sign of success, that I have somehow got under their skin, and made statements that they cannot logically refute, which leaves them only with the option of saying I am mad, evil and doomed to failure.

Right about what, you ask?

Right about how deeply political sex is and always will be and how condoning female promiscuity, ie tolerating the SSMs and the causes of SSMs, would mean, soon enough, the end of your race, nation and civilisation because it is a cancer that will soon affect every major organ, including your brain and with it your ability to think, speak and act rationally and honourably.    Once you lose the ability to think rationally and act honourably - and how can a society tyrannised by the feminine vices of irrationality, sentimentality, cowardice and hypocrisy be capable of thinking rationally and acting honourably? - you and your race, nation, culture and civilisation no longer deserve to survive.

A nation whose men are afraid of criticising the worst of their women do not deserve to survive.

After Hubris comes Nemesis, who is waiting in the wings .... 

SHIT happens when you don't call things by their proper names

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confucianism#Rectification_of_names

If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things.

If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success.

When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish.

When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded.

When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot.

Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect."

(Analects XIII, 3, tr. Legge)

To be a racist is the worst thing to be, but what is a racist and what constitutes racism?

Is complaining about immigration racism and bigotry?

Is BASTARDY a good thing?

Slut Single Mums are mothers of bastards. What is wrong with this definition apart from the fact that this will cause offence to sluts and bastards? Why should we consider the feelings of sluts and bastards anyway?  Are they really better than married mothers or the legitimate?

A promiscuous woman is the worst sort of woman to be (and she is also the worst sort of employee), because she breeds bastards.

Why is "bastard" a derogatory term?

Because the stupidity and the low standards of the mother will be passed on to her offspring.  Not only that, the bastard will probably have had a deprived childhood and be deprived of the benign influence of a loving male parental figure and his family connections because of the stupidity and promiscuity of his or her mother.

Excuses and allowances will be made for him if one wishes to be compassionate, lowering standards of morality and education.

It is from Sluts and Bastards that the British developed their Culture of Excuses.

If no excuses and allowances are made then we will feel bad for being harsh and illiberal.

Now, we have got to the stage where even a party that is supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race dare not criticise these sluts, because most of their membership consists of sluts and bastards.

The BNP no longer dares to criticise these promiscuous women, who commit the foul sin that is the miscegenation of the unmarried, who are making the white race weaker, more stupid, more degenerate and more cowardly with every bastard born in Britain each minute of the day.

That is why British employers would rather gouge out their eyes than hire British employees, and that is why the government continues to let immigrant labour enter the country to replace the useless bastards of the sluts.

Damned if you are nice to sluts and bastards, and also damned if you are not.

Let us call a spade a spade, a slut a slut and a bastard a bastard, instead of calling them "one-parent families".  Then we will know exactly what to do with them.  

Why I am NOT guilty of hate speech

"The reason why blacks is mostly criminals in the US is cos they are mostly sluts and bastards.

I am beginning to think this is white people's fault cos their governments tolerate sluts and bastards and don't discourage the stupidest and most depraved of their women from breeding at taxpayers' expense and then not educating them properly and tolerating SHIT mothers.

Yeah, so black people being mostly shit is cos the white government they live under are mostly shit.

Yeah, so this means white people to blame cos they is in charge.

White people are now sick and dying of feminism but they don't know it, poor sick fuckers.

Every time I tell them they is poor sick fuckers they get mad at me."

Someone reported my Facebook comment at https://www.facebook.com/groups/247864665271965/

"Facebook does not tolerate hate speech. Please grant each other mutual respect when you communicate here. While we encourage the discussion of ideas, institutions, events and practices, it is a serious violation of our terms to single out individuals based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or disease."

I am NOT singling out individuals based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or disease.

I am singling them out on the basis of their BEHAVIOUR and the fact that their government is so craven and cowardly that they refuse to criticise slut single mums, continue to condone female promiscuity and make the taxpayer sponsor the lifestyle choices of these stupid and irresponsible women who breed the next generation of criminals and bastard-breeding sluts and then wonder why their entire civilisation is going down the fucking plughole.

(Hell, even the BNP - the party that opposes the liberal political establishment and is supposed to be promoting the interests of the white race - are too scared to talk about slut single mums and how they are degrading the national gene pool with their sluttiness and bastardy.  They are so frightened of alienating the female vote that they expelled me at the behest of a slut single mum with disabled and illegitimate offspring, who took offence at what I said.  Now, they are so scared of their degenerate, illegitimate and disabled members from the North that London Organisers face expulsion just for allowing me to attend their meetings.)

I am happy to acknowledge that not all women are sluts and not all mothers are slut single mums. I am therefore NOT GUILTY of hate speech.

Nation of Disabled Sluts and Bastards Cursed by God

"43 The foreigners who reside among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 They will lend to you, but you will not lend to them. They will be the head, but you will be the tail."       Deuteronomy 28

The above is a state of affairs that the BNP have been complaining about since they began their existence.  


But why is it that they themselves are so despised and shunned?  The reasons are as follows.  



1. Everyone hates sluts and bastards, and even sluts and bastards who have a glimmer of self knowledge and detached self-analysis hate themselves too. 


2. We all know the BNP are full of sluts and bastards.


3. The fact that I got expelled from the BNP because I offended a slut with disabled offspring shows that sluts with bastards cannot be criticised. This does not apply only within the BNP but in wider society in Britain as well.


4. The fact that I was only saying something plainly true http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html, which got me expelled, and which I had a right to say in a country that pretends it believes in free speech, is testament to the level of morality now to be expected from the white man.  "The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men."


5. The fact that Eddy Butler - the BNP's former National Organiser but now proscribed and the sworn enemy of the current BNP leader - said he thought I should have been suspended for telling the offensive truth shows that he no longer believes in free speech but in cowardly, hypocritical, mendacious prevarication which is of course the trait of women, and excusable only in women. 


6. The fact that Eddy Butler wants to join the English Democrats shows that he is happy to be associated with a party known for its mediocrity of talent. 


7. The English Democrats will never amount to anything because:


(a) Its very existence is an admission of the defeat of British nationalism.


(b) Its ideology of accepting and accelerating the breakup of the UK is actually harmful to English interests.


(c) Its policy of attracting bums on seats without any regard for quality shows its narrow aims, which is to take anyone Eurosceptic as well as the rejects of the 4th and 5th parties. 


(d)  The presentation of their policies of motherhood and apple pie, couched in the terms devoid of detail, is intentional, for they do not want to offend anyone and will take anyone, like an ugly ageing whore who will have to take any business going.  


Eddy Butler, to my horror, has expressed himself happy with this and says he sees no need for change.  Such an organisation will certainly survive because the supply of fools in this world is unlimited and there is one born every minute.  However, any self-respecting man with genuine ambitions to change things should scorn such an unworthy compromise. 


Eddy Butler has given up. If he had any fight left in him he would start a radical but non-racist civic nationalist party with me, but he refuses to either contemplate or discuss it, because he cannot afford to be seen to be associating with the likes of me, because of the things I say about Feminists, Sluts and Bastards, because he wants to be SAFE.


In summary, the following conditions prevail:


1.  The LibLabCon are afraid of Slut Single Mums because too many of them now have the vote.  (Over half the babies born in Britain now are bastards).  http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23427447-more-than-half-of-all-british-babies-are-born-out-of-marriage.do


2.  The parties who oppose the LibLabCon, ie UKIP and BNP, are afraid of Slut Single Mums.  (It was a Slut Single Mum in the BNP who got me expelled for saying things offensive to the Disabled and their Slut Single Mum ie herself.)


3.  Those who dissent from the leadership of UKIP and BNP (such as Eddy Butler and the English Democrats), are also afraid of Slut Single Mums.  


WHO AND WHAT ARE SLUT SINGLE MUMS?  


Slut Single Mums are women who make bad reproductive choices, who choose violent criminals as sex partners, have illegitimate children by them and then complain when their badly chosen male partners misbehave, who expect the taxpayer to pick up the tab for their ruined lives, who do not take kindly to criticism of their lifestyle choice and may threaten violence and death upon those who do challenge their behaviour.  


Another example is Riven Vincent who knew she had MS as long ago as 13 years ago.  Another example of a woman who has made a bad reproductive choice is Riven Vincent who knew she had MS as long ago as 13 years ago (but, because she is married, does not come under the category of an SSM (Slut Single Mum) though her reproductive choice was undeniably questionable).  She then went on to have a severely disabled daughter who is now 7, who cannot lift her head, move any of her limbs and is blind.  Riven Vincent's MS has now kicked in and she too is now disabled and therefore is the unofficial holder of the most martyred woman in the Britain.  You could not hope to make a worse reproductive choice even if you tried.   Indeed, she is Queen of the Disabled and Mumsnet and the PM himself admits that he is afraid of Mumsnet.  Riven Vincent is therefore above criticism.  Indeed, she is treated as if she were above the Queen, who is often the victim of tasteless jokes by Republicans.


But it gets worse, for I have discovered that nationalist men are actually not afraid of admitting that they are afraid of women like these, and these women are the worst of people, whose reproductive choices bring shame to this nation (because their offspring are illegitimate and grow up criminal) or, if they are not, they bring disability (both learning and physical) to the next generation in increasing numbers.   
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html


But these men shrug their shoulders and refuse to defend my freedom to say what is in fact true, however offensive it is.   "What do you expect?  You were offensive and we don't want to offend anyone by having you as a member."  This, from members of a party whose very existence is found offensive by the political establishment!  


How can men who are afraid of the worst of people, Slut Single Mums who cannot even choose a decent partner to have a child with, ever ever succeed?


These are men who are afraid to criticise women whose reproductive choices, if left unchecked, would lead to Britain consisting mostly of Disabled Sluts and Disabled Bastards?


Deuteronomy 28 finishes with the curse:

68 The LORD will send you back in ships to Egypt on a journey I said you should never make again. There you will offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no one will buy you.

Who would want to buy a Disabled Slut or a Disabled Bastard as a slave?   


There was a time when the children taken from Britain as slaves to be sold in Rome were praised for their angelic appearance.  


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_Angli,_sed_Angeli#Famous_quotes_and_anecdotes

"Non Angli, sed angeli" – "They are not Angles, but angels". Aphorism, summarizing words reported to have been spoken by Gregory when he first encountered pale-skinned English boys at a slave market, sparking his dispatch of St. Augustine of Canterbury to England to convert the English, according to Bede. He said: "Well named, for they have angelic faces and ought to be co-heirs with the angels in heaven." Discovering that their province was Deira, he went on to add that they would be rescued de ira, "from the wrath", and that their king was named Aella, Alleluia, he said.

Perhaps now - should such a terrible thing happen - they would only be sold as meat not fit for human consumption.   



Who are the accursed then?


http://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/worship/book-of-common-prayer/a-commination.aspx

"Cursed are the unmerciful, fornicators [Who are Fornicators but Slut Single Mums breeding criminal and variously-fathered feral bastards whose numbers now exceed that of wives of husbands who have babies born in wedlock?], and adulterers, covetous persons, idolaters, slanderers, drunkards, and extortioners."

It does sound like they mean us, does it not?  (Implicitly included are those who refuse to condemn them, and this is just about everyone in the land.)  



A nation whose men are afraid of Sluts and Bastards turn the other way and pretend not to hear, or even understand what I am saying, because to even show an inkling of understanding of what I am saying would mean they would have to agree with me.  


If they agreed with me they would feel a moral imperative to join me in being abused and vilified by the feminazis, which, being the women they have now become, they are not prepared to do.    


As men they would then feel uncomfortable about their role in life, and so men like Eddy Butler will pretend that I am an extremist or a crank while he is the one being pragmatic and moderate.  

I have this to tell Eddy Butler:


The truth just is, whatever we think is reasonable, moderate or moral, and it is we must accommodate ourselves to the truth, rather than accommodate the truth to our preferences, ideology and perceptions.  


Those who prefer safety to liberty deserve NEITHER.

Why the Family and Marriage are called "Institutions"

The institutions of human society are Marriage and Family.

What is an "institution"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institution

"An institution is any structure or mechanism of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of a set of individuals within a given human community. Institutions are identified with a social purpose and permanence, transcending individual human lives and intentions, and with the making and enforcing of rules governing cooperative human behavior."

The institution of Marriage keeps humans distinct from animals, and we desecrate it at our peril.  Once we have desecrated Marriage, then a Matriarchy that will mean the death of your culture, society and civilisation follows inevitably.

Marriage is a patriarchal idea, by the way, and that is why Feminism - an ideology of the Matriarchy - has systematically eroded the institutions of Marriage and thereby the Family and thereby Western societies and thereby Western civilisation itself.

And that is why the only good matriarchy is a dead matriarchy.  It is the totalitarian statist matriarchy that encourages Slut Single Mums to breed at the expense of the taxpayer and forbids the criticism of Slut Single Mums.

Remember: lower animals are either single-parents or have harems.  Only humans have the institutions of Marriage and Family that comes between the two extremes.

Why would we want to live like animals when we can live like humans?

Anti-Slut Campaign in Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland after the riots

"Don't howl Starkey down. Gangsta culture is a poison spreading among youths of all races"
(For 'gangsta culture' read 'SLUT SINGLE MUM culture')

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026053/David-Starkey-Gangsta-culture-poison-spreading-youths-races.html


I am already known for being the victim of a BNP single mum with disabled children who got the Chairman to expel me from the party by kicking up a fuss when I pointed out to her that eugenics had always been discreetly practised before the welfare state and asked her why it was not her fault when she became a single mum after she was impregnated by a violent criminal who was not her husband. I am also known for challenging the likes of Ed West (whom I believe may have sired illegitimate children and is refusing to marry their mother),  Norman Wells of Family Youth Concern who persist in calling a spade a spatula and who tells me that his organisation is not in the business of bashing single mums.  (If it is not in the business of bashing single mums and feel thoroughly ashamed of themselves, then what the hell is his organisation for?  He could not answer, nor would he tell me what he thought was the preventing his organisation from being more successful because he would have had to use the dreaded F word - FEMINISM.)

Most important and egregious of all are those in the Tory Party such as Theresa Twat May and Cunt Cameron who have betrayed the principles of Conservatism and encouraged, as long ago as 2002, slut single mothers to breed at taxpayers' expense.

My sacrifice is already known. I refuse to cower before the worst of women and the worst of people. So all I have to do now is challenge them into having a public debate. Patience and persistence, not disorderly retreat and unprincipled apologies to the stupid, promiscuous, irresponsible and arrogant, who do not deserve it.

If I can count on the support of this rare group of people called right-thinking members of society - even if it is a grudging "I agree with her views though not with her choice of words"- then things can be taken further.

But I already know that scummy, emasculated, cowardly and hypocritical educated white middle class men will be too fearful of incurring the wrath of the feminazis. In this matter only the Muslims dare challenge feminism while the Jews, Christians and even the BNP cower before the slut single mum who multiply like cancer cells and turn their civilisation into the degraded degenerate demented stinking mess that it is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.  (Yes, feminism causes paedophilia too.)

Not even the BNP - can you believe that? Not even an ORTHODOX Rabbi will say anything against slut single mums encouraged by successive governments to breed at the expense of the taxpayer.

The Jews behave like cunning manipulative women who prevaricate and don't show their hand on account of their being a despised and persecuted minority while Christianity is the religion of slaves and women, and we cannot expect much from those with the mentality of slaves and whose heads are stuffed with feminine preoccupations and sensibilities, can we?

I can therefore only count on the Muslims now to support me in this, it would appear.  The Koran after all commands them to man up and enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, but will they be too Westernised and Anglilcised and therefore too feeble-minded and feeble-spirited by now to do even this?

We can only wait and pray and see.   It was after all the Muslim community - the ones who had all the shops to loot - who suffered the most.  Whites are now as scummy mummily single-parented as blacks, these days, and that was really the point that David Starkey was trying to make.  Three of their brave young men got mown down by CHAV bastard scum the spawn of slut single mums.   Will they at least challenge feminism?  After all, they now live here and ought to care what happens to this society, if only out of self-interest.

Over to you, Muslim Council of Britain and Association of British Muslims.