The female sexual deviant

The main problem as I see it is that it makes men passive.

Years ago I had a girlfriend who complained about the passivity of men. All these men she found so infuriatingly passive must have already been sexually assaulted before they were sexually assaulted by her, I imagine.

I knew a male friend whose history was all about being chased by women. He never fought for anything and always gave in to expediency. He told me the nurse seduced him when he was an adolescent.

Men and women who have bad first relationships repeat the same pattern of behaviour even though they must have been painful.

It is not even the act itself, but the pattern of behaviour it establishes which is often lifelong. It emasculates men by making them sit around waiting for an older woman to make the move. This means they will probably never marry and never become fathers, content in their passivity.

Why some female teachers have sex with schoolboys

http://theothermccain.com/2016/09/13/teacher-had-sex-with-12-year-old-boy/

http://news3lv.com/news/local/former-teachernicole-willfinger-charged-with-sex-with-student-to-face-stricter-penalties

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/female-teacher-admits-having-sex-8383454

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3549878/Female-teacher-27-sex-16-year-old-boy-faces-jail-admitting-six-month-relationship-child.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10578951/Female-history-teacher-who-shared-bed-with-two-schoolboys-banned-from-classroom-for-sexual-misconduct.html

Not only are men lower than sluts, sluts are now corrupting the morals of boys.

The best way of corrupting boys is to give them sex before they even ask for it, so they will always yearn to be taken by a woman the way a woman is taken by a man.

Men now yearn to be dominated by women, to be disciplined and punished. It turns them on.

The more power men give to women, the more they will take, and to be weak is to invite exploitation.

It is clearly the intention of these immoral female teachers to corrupt the morals of adolescent schoolboys in their charge in order to destroy their masculinity as adult men. You won't have much masculinity to display if all the while you are seeking a woman who is older than you who will dominate you and boss you around. Give such a man who has been got at by an older woman a submissive woman, and he won't know what to do with her.

Men who are submissive to women and addicted to sex with sluts are easy to control. Such men would never be able to recognise a principle, much less stand up and fight for it. Such men would be spiritually incapable of standing up for the patriarchy and incapable of even desiring a patriarchy because patriarchy supports marriage and this by definition means it would forbid and punish extramarital sex, which is the very thing they are constantly craving for.

Sex addicted men are not interested in marrying and having progeny, but in merely continuing to enjoy sex with women they are not married to. Most men in the West are MCSFs - Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage.

Such men would be spiritually incapable of protecting their women from invaders. Men with no wives and offspring are not going to risk anything to protect sluts or random women from invaders. They can't even get it together to challenge the status quo - feminism- after all.

Talking to Western men about this is like talking to drug-addicted and intoxicated men who are incapable of focusing on the matter at hand, much less being persuaded by the case I have put to them for supporting marriage.

All they will be capable of doing is denying that things are as bad as they say they are and then changing the subject to something they would much rather talk and think about, probably the next fix of extramarital sex they hope to get.

I guess we women in the West will be taken as slaves and sex slaves by invaders because our men are too weak, gay and old to defend us.

The invaders will be predictably Muslim, and Western women will have no choice.

Perhaps surrender will be sweet, precisely because it is inevitable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_a_Scandal_(film)

How to deal with sex crimes and underage sex in Britain to encourage parental responsibility

It was pointed out to me that "the lack of distinction between those who commit statutory rape or indecent assault on a sexually mature individual in contrast to those who commit crimes against children is an example of populist demonising". I was also invited to contrast the behaviour of Stuart Hall and Jimmy Savile and Paul Gadd with the teacher who ran away with his under-aged pupil to France.

PROPOSED SOLUTIONS:

1. Legalise brothels.
2. Criminalise all extramarital sex outside brothels while dispensing with the Age of Consent as a means of regulating fornication.
3. Raise the age at which one can legally marry to the age of legal capacity, ie 18.
4. Make parents responsible for their children by deeming parents with daughters who have consensual underage sex and give birth to illegitimate offspring as unfit parents.
5. If the under-aged slut is having underage sex while residing with her divorced mother, the divorced mother should be declared an unfit mother. 
6. If the underage slut is having underage sex while residing with her her SSM, the SSM https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts should be deemed liable to the punishment her slut daughter would have received.  For example if the underage slut gives birth to octuplets, the SSM who became a grandmother would be liable to 800 lashes on the basis of 100 lashes per illegitimate offspring, unless she formally disowns her daughter.
7. Fallen women will be expected to work in brothels.  

The incorrigible stupidity, treachery and incompetence of British politicians on the subject of RAPE

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13444770

Derbyshire: Rape is rape, with respect.

Clarke: No it's not, and if an 18-year-old has sex with a 15-year-old and she's perfectly willing, that is rape. That's 'cause she's underage, can't consent. Anybody has sex with a 15-year-old, it's rape. So what you and I are talking about, we're talking about a man forcibly having sex with a woman and she doesn't want to. That is rape. Serious crime, of course it's a serious crime. And I'm very glad that people do now got to the police and report it. There used to be a taboo against it, in a crazy way.

Clarke should have known not to confuse a tabloid radio show hostess http://twitter.com/#!/vicderbyshire and her baying listeners, consisting mainly of the incorrigibly self-righteous and the incorrigibly ignorant, with too many facts.

Statutory Rape and Jailbait 


Being a lawyer, he wanted to show off his knowledge about statutory rape by explaining it to a lay audience. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape.

BAD MOVE.  

Some of you may be familiar with the term "jailbait" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jailbait - an Americanism.  I still remember how an American acquintance once thought it was a great compliment to repeatedly tell a very pretty and posh English girl that she was jailbait, to the distaste and horror of those around him.

This means, boys and girls, that even if it was the under-aged girl who offered to have sex with you and it was all her idea, and it was she who jumped your bones, you're gonna get done for statutory rape when she decides she doesn't love you any more and is feeling a bit vindictive.  Understand?

Is Ed Miliband a complete shit for asking him to resign over something like this?

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/ed-miliband-why-i-was-right-to-demand-that-clarke-should-go-2286630.html

Does the Labour Party believe in responsible Opposition?

We all know the answer to that, don't we?