Feminism has turned men into sheep.
It is all to do with the price of sex. Marriage is obviously the most expensive form of sex, but men will only marry if they acquire obvious advantages after marriage, eg status and sex.
If they see unmarried men also getting sex without the bother and cost of having a wife and family, they will soon elect not to marry when they see most men getting bad settlements in divorce, eg losing their homes and losing contact with their children.
Feminism, because it says that women have the right to be as promiscuous as men on the grounds of gender equality, bribes men with cheap sex.
If sex is a drug then the male is the user and the female the supplier. It is the
addiction to the idea of having a right to have sex with women they are not married to that turns men into sheep.
It was chasing the female vote under the system we call representative democracy that led to this state of affairs.
And it is of course the fact that half the voters are women that makes this situation difficult to correct without proposing measures that they would predictably resist, eg
a. repealing the Equality Act 2010
b. abolishing no fault divorce
c. narrowing the franchise
Indeed, to solve the problem we have to breach TWO taboos:
1. forbidding extramarital sex (which is logically the only way of respecting marriage, which no one cares to do anyway)
2. acknowledging that indiscriminate universal suffrage was a grave error and should be corrected by the rule of no representation without taxation
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html
Because the people who are most likely to agree with me are despised beta-omega males in despised fringe parties who are social and political pariahs, it does not appear that this warning will be heeded. As for the so-called alpha males of British society, these men would be men in the liberal political establishment who will be paralysed by their inability beyond to think beyond the next general election and will be too frightened and stupid to make out a strong enough case to move anyone sufficiently to change their view or behaviour.
"A taboo is a vehement prohibition of an action based on the belief that such behavior is either too sacred or too accursed for ordinary individuals to undertake, under threat of supernatural punishment. Such prohibitions are present in virtually all societies.The word has been somewhat expanded in the social sciences to strong prohibitions relating to any area of human activity or custom that is sacred or forbidden based on moral judgment and religious beliefs. "Breaking a taboo" is usually considered objectionable by society in general, not merely a subset of a culture."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taboo
While I shall continue to say what I can about SSMs and MCSFs, these beta-omega males will continue to withhold their support from me, because, on the one hand they will perceive me as a female and a foreigner proposing to breach two major taboos and whom they have already denounced as mad, and on the other hand feel that even if they wanted to do what I do they will not be up to the job. They will therefore just pretend there is nothing can do while also denouncing anyone who hopes to do something as mad and deluded.
The men most likely to agree with me would be male members of UKP and the BNP, but they are almost without exception despised social pariahs ie beta-omega males who are low in courage, resources and charisma or just elderly men who are not going to be around for much longer.
So you see, boys and girls, why other nations hate and fear sluts and homos and anyone who indulges in extramarital sex with such a visceral contempt. It is precisely to avoid the fate of the Western man, who is now lower than sluts and too much in denial to even discuss it, let alone do anything about, while his institutions are all now hopelessly infested with those who would condone bastardy and sluttery, all the way up to the Pope himself.
Western civilisation really is a car crash in slow motion.
