Translate

Showing posts with label Jeremy Clarkson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeremy Clarkson. Show all posts

Monday, 8 December 2014

Tuesday, 6 May 2014

British celebrity wives infamous for their faithlessness and treachery

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2621092/Jeremy-Clarksons-wife-Alex-Hall-wishes-second-partner-luck-divorce.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2619149/Will-Cliffords-wife-file-divorce-Friend-claims-hes-got.html

https://www.facebook.com/groups/121566994537384/

You already know that your ex-wife can take you to the cleaners and get more or less half your stuff whenever she fancies a divorce, for no good reason. All she has to be is bored and irritated with you and fancy a change.

If she is really malicious, she can accuse you of paedophilia and deprive you of your children, while still compelling you to pay for them.

You can be assured of breath-taking injustice in the Family Courts whose judges are mostly men-hating female judges.

Family courts sit in camera, which means no journalist can report on any injustice meted out to you. This is justified on the grounds of the children's privacy.

When you declare an official marriage strike, the idea is to induce the smarter, self-respecting kind of women to declare a sex strike.

If this state of affairs persists then national extinction will be the consequence, since only stupid sluts, slags and slappers will happily get knocked up by low-life losers and become the "wives" of the taxpayer, who have been the victims of this kind of forced marriage.

Don't look to the government to do anything. They are too scared and spineless. Somebody might get upset or offended and they might - shock horror! - lose precious votes.

To recap the battle plans of this Gender War:

PHASE 1 - Marriage Strike by Men

PHASE 2 - Sex Strike by Women

PHASE 3 - negotiation of the marriage contract resulting in

1. the reintroduction of fault in divorce.

2. the presumption of children staying with their mother until 7

3. the presumption of children being in the care of their fathers after 7, so that their children are not abused (sexually, emotionally or physically) by any unsuitable new male partner of their ex-wife

You know it makes sense.

Do it to show you know what it means to be a man.

Do it to get a Decent Wife.

Do it for the next generation.

Do it for your country.

Do it for Western civilisation!

Women, don't even think about giving him sex if you want a husband and a father for your children until you get that ring on your finger!

Being easy meat only encourages men to think they don't need to commit to any woman to get sex.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/152984411411388/ is the MARRIAGE CONTRACT CLUB which is also a Claire Khaw Group connected to this project to renegotiate the terms of male and female co-existence in the context of bringing up the next generation.

Friday, 2 May 2014

OFFICIAL: Britain now no longer has any alpha males


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27259318
Max Clifford jailed for eight years for sex assaults


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-27253880
Jeremy Clarkson: BBC upbraids presenter over 'racist' clip

https://www.facebook.com/pages/IC3s-and-IC5s-for-Jeremy-Clarkson-and-Free-Speech/1430217037233292?fref=ts


I know the British Prime Minister is officially considered the alpha male of Britain, but we all know that the British ceased to respect their Prime Ministers a long time ago.  Therefore only powerful men who were not politicians were the unofficial alpha males of Britain, but one by one they have been systematically persecuted and humiliated.

While feminists may shrug indifferently or even cackle with glee at these men getting their comeuppance, it will come to the notice of the foreigner that the British do not in fact have an alpha male to represent them, and treat them accordingly.

From now on British men who no longer have free speech are officially lower than women who could well be making false accusations using a legal process that is the opposite of fair.

I fear for these men, especially those who are now ignorant and arrogant enough to still be in denial. We know what happens to a nation that is known not to have masculine and parental authority, in which every policy is subverted to the preferences of the slut and whose men are afraid not only of their women, but the worst of their women.

http://news.uk.msn.com/uk/harman-urges-bbc-to-sack-clarkson
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/pie-controversy-harriet-harman-has-got-this-one-wrong-9162728.html
Harriet Harman urges the BBC to sack Clarkson.

Will the woman said to be a one of the "covert supporters of child abuse" calling for the sacking of Jeremy Clarkson get her way? If so, this means that the position of men - even men perceived to be alpha males in Britain - is precariously low.  In truth, there is no alpha male of Britain, for no man can be said to be an alpha male if he fears to criticise the morals of the omega female, and the SSM https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts  is the classic example of the omega female. Because of how representative democracy works in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage, the alpha male of Britain and all the others who aspire to take his position are too afraid to offend the omega female, who have the vote.

It can be seen that if Clifford had not been arrogant and defiant, and instead bowed his head, complained of a rotten childhood and being abused by his father or even cried a little at how suicidal the whole business had made him, he might have gotten off.

That's all right then. Men just have to shuffle around like a servile servant, submissive and supplicating, to stay out of trouble. A life worse than death was what women used to be threatened with if they were immoral. Now men are afraid of immoral women.

The solution is simple: narrow the franchise, abolish representative democracy, introduce the practise of slut-shaming and respecting marriage, but the men are now too afraid and risk-averse to even protest.

This is how civilisations die.

Woman said to be one of the "covert supporters of child abuse" calls for the sacking of Jeremy Clarkson. 

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

Does making a pun mean you are racist? Patrick Moore once made a racist joke about me.

A slope on the bridge
http://cutedecision.com/dragon-eco-bridge-organic-architecture-of-the-new-bridge-in-china/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2582833/Jeremy-Clarkson-accused-racism-Top-Gear-series-finale-Thailand.html

I would suggest not.

May I also point out that racism has not in fact been defined.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/supreme-court-should-give-us-definition.html

It would please me if Clarkson would retract his apology about shooting trade unionists in front of their family.  Or perhaps he would retract that apology in relation to all trade unionists except for Christine Blower of the NUT who has ruined the education of so many generations of British children.

Just as I am sure we have all said something that would offend our friends, colleagues and family if they had heard every thing we had ever said about them, we will also have said something that would offend another race if they had heard everything we ever had said about that race.

If racism does mean "anything said by a member of one race that might offend a member of another race" then the question arises as to why we may offend people on other grounds but not on grounds of race.

It is of course a philosophical question, and politicians are infamously inept at answering philosophical questions.

I remember the late Patrick Moore making a silly joke about a chink in the curtain when he was giving a talk in Oslo about the Northern Lights.  He was on stage and I was merely a member of the audience, but remember having the feeling that he must have meant me.  This was over 15 years ago I am sure and I remember feeling a little taken aback at the time, but am glad I have survived the experience and lived to tell the tale.



People who think that their race is better than yours are no more and no less irritating than people of your own race making it clear that they think they are better than you.  People like that eventually get their comeuppance anyway.

http://www.theweek.co.uk/people-news/46588/sir-patrick-moore-only-good-kraut-dead-kraut shows that he had form for this sort of thing.  I do take exception to the unkind things he has said about Germans because I have German relations myself and hand on my heart I can say all the Germans I have ever met have been utterly charming and kind.  

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

Are SSMs and tolerance of SSMs the reason why British education is falling behind?

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londoners-diary/maths-clearly-not-nut-leaders-strong-point-8629616.html

http://www.politicshome.com/uk/story/18105/

Is this woman to blame for the failure of British education?

Should she be shot as Jeremy Clarkson once suggested?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15977813

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-25187997
Are the countries who did better than Britain in the PISA tests less slut and bastard than the English and Scots?

http://neatoday.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/2012PISAResultssnapshot.png has the list of countries who did better than Britain.  Are they less slut and bastard than the British?

Most British mothers are SSMs according to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

What are SSMs?  https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379 explains.

http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/DYBNat/NatStatTab13.pdf and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Non_marital_by_countries.gif has statistics on illegitimacy.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-25196974
Are the Welsh more slut and bastard than the English and the Scots?

Are British parents the worst in the world?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

Is illegitimacy rather than race is the real root of crime, under-achievement and degeneracy?
https://old.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517

Is the cause of degeneracy feminism?

Does feminism encourage female promiscuity?

Does female promiscuity facilitate male promiscuity?

Does fornication lead to illegitimacy?

Does illegitimacy lead to degeneracy?

Does feminism cause women to become bad men and men to become bad women?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2175009/Our-schools-need-tough-guys-teaching-teenage-boys-feminised-men-caring-primary-level-infants.html

Should feminism be questioned, challenged, denounced and renounced, for the good and long term survival of your civilisation?  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2006/02/17/the_return_of_patriarchy?page=0,0

Are most women feminists?  I would suggest that most men and women are indeed feminists.

Who is a feminist? Someone who objects to repealing the Equality Act 2010 and who won't reintroduce fault into divorce.

The overwhelming number of voters in the West are feminists.  Even UKIP refuse to propose repealing the Equality Act 2001, which is liberal thoughtcrime.

The BNP, which used to propose repealing all anti-discrimination legislation finds itself not quite saying that any more and do not even mention it, so effeminate have they become.  Have you seen their shit heart-shaped new logo?  http://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2011/may/12/bnp-unveils-new-logo  Whom do you think was meant to be to appeal?  Women and children, of course, who are mostly stupid.

Do they ever talk about education?  Do they fuck, most of them are so fucking thick they don't even know what a grammar school is.  Even if they knew what it was, they would say "It's not for the likes of us."  If you started talking about selective education, their mouths fall open and their eyes would close in dumb incomprehension and boredom.  They are mostly slut and bastard too and because they are most affected by sluttery and bastardy, they are the people most unlikely to help themselves.  They are actually so stupid that they don't even know why people despise them, and keep blaming the Jews and Muslims as they attend their demos to show off their non-existent dress sense and their plebeian nature while making people despise them even more.  Their leader is like a parent who lets his children do whatever they like to do "as long as they are happy".  In this way does the sluttery, bastardy and the singular lack of breeding and education lead to the decline and fall of your civilisation.  They still don't know why British employers don't want to hire British workers.  British employers don't want to hire British workers cos they are mostly slut and bastard employees  no sane employer would want to hire if the option of hiring immigrant but non-slut and non-bastard employees is available.  Apparently, they don't get it that to be hired by British employers they would have to be competitive ie be cheaper and work harder, but that is another concept that has also gone out of the window with the average degenerate nationalist.  They expected to be treated like a privileged protected species about to become extinct, but they are hardly pandas, are they?

Is the teaching-profession female-dominated?  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102759/Why-boys-failing-grade-classroom-Lack-male-teachers-reason-according-new-study.html

What is a particularly feminine vice?  I would suggest denial.

At what stage of the 5 stages of grief are the British at in accepting that their political and educational system is shit and they should do something about it, such as denounce liberalism and feminism and announce their execution at the hands of reason?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model  Not very advanced, I don't think.

Has what has been passed off as new and different ways of grading pupils and students merely been the means of hiding the failure of the corrupt and incompetent teaching establishment?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/gcse-grades-to-change-to-help-bosses-select-brightest-pupils-8916476.html suggests that previous grading systems were meant to confuse parents and employers and give pupils equality of failure while hiding the shittiness of British education and teaching.

Is the female-dominated teaching profession conspiring against boys?  You betcha.  Females like to tell males they are inferior just as much as males used to like telling females they were inferior.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1055395/Boys-raw-deal-school-education-tilted-favour-girls.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-432947/Stop-feminising-schools--boys-suffering.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7026774/Boys-failed-by-education-system-says-Eton-headmaster.html

Either that, or they remain in denial.

Is anyone going to tell them the truth?  Dare they?  Effeminate men are risk-averse and adopt feminine stratagems to protect themselves.  How long can they stay in denial?  How long is a piece of fucking string?

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

My advice to Muslims in the West about how to become less hated: by not fearing to be hated even more

https://www.facebook.com/notes/yamin-zakaria/write-to-your-mp-and-others-regarding-the-potential-threat-from-the-far-right/238362692862747


Write to your MP and others regarding the potential threat from the far-right
by Yamin Zakaria (Notes) on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 18:17
Below is a copy of the letter that I sent to my local and European MPs, maybe you can alter it and send it to your local MPs (http://www.writetothem.com/)  and create a certain level of public opinion.

------------------------------------------------

Dear Sir/Madam

In light of recent events in Norway, and the subsequent revelations of Anders Breivik’s link with the far-right movement (EDL), we are naturally worried about a potential terrorist act in the United Kingdom.

We would urge the government to take pre-emptive measures under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and curtail the activities of movements like the EDL. This is an excellent opportunity to show that such legislation (PTA) was not construed to be applied selectively against Muslims in the UK. This will help to build bridges and marginalise the radicals on both sides.

The government should look for signs of radicalisation and its sources; hence, those who are particularly violent and vocal in the EDL should be detained in Belmarsh. It might be better to hand them over to the Americans who have acquired a certain level of expertise in interrogation (‘torture’); water-boarding may indeed prove to be useful in saving innocent British lives.

This would send a message that any terrorist or potential terrorist would be subjected to these sorts of preventative measures. In addition, it would be prudent to take measures against the conveyor belt of far-right terrorism by monitoring the voices of BNP, UKIP and other commentators who stoke hate towards the Muslim community. For example, Melanie Phillips is well-known for her venomous comments, and such hate will eventually translate into violence. Would nasty comments towards the black community be tolerated? Hence, why are the Muslims selectively subjected to this kind of treatment?

In this recent case in Norway as well as the Oklahoma bombings, the media initially speculated that the act was the work of the Muslims, tarring the entire community, creating suspicion and doubt. Therefore, the media should also be given clear directives how to deal with sensitive topics so that communities are not divided and ethnic minorities are not marginalised and subjected to verbal assault; the need for this has become self-evident in the light of the recent scandals (hack-gate).

 Yours sincerely

Yamin Zakaria (www.radicalviews.org


Below is my response to this Muslim proposal to put the Far Right under observation as stringent as Muslims are currently being subjected to.


Breivik was a loner concerned about immigration, knowing that it would irretrievably change Norway. He did it all himself after he decided that participating in the political process was futile. Writing to your MP or even monitoring the activities of the Far Right won't help either, since Breivik did it ALL BY HIMSELF as did the others who joined a political party, left it, and then went on to plan and commit acts of terrorism ALL BY THEMSELVES.

We are not even allowed to ask what else he could have done to make his point, are we?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/controversial-new-group-for.html


I created a Facebook group asking precisely that question and it was deleted. 

As for the parties you call Far Right, they cannot manage a piss-up in a brewery. Nick Griffin exists to make money out of the white working classes who dislike immigration and do not see why they cannot complain about it without being called evil racist Fascist Nazi extremists. 

If you were white working class and not very educated you might even be a member of the BNP because you wish to assert your right to complain about immigration. 

How would Muslims like their homelands to be full of immigrants while being forbidden to complain about them?

I have already come to the conclusion that the reason why Britain is full of immigrants is simply because if feminism resulting in white British women not having enough children who are brought up by their mothers or taught in their schools to become productive citizens and employees a sane employer might wish to hire. 

Instead of addressing the problems of education and widespread illegitimacy (which would mean

(1) dealing with the teaching unions and perhaps shooting them in front of their families, as Jeremy Clarkson once suggested
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/8930717/Jeremy-Clarksons-execute-strikers-joke-sparks-21000-complaints-to-BBC.html 

(2) criticising the Feminazis such as Dame Jenni Murray (possibly the most evil woman in Britain) as well as her sidekick Jane Garvey at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007qlvb as well as Justine Roberts and Carrie Longton of Mumsnet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumsnet#History successive governments have in fact conspired to facilitate yet more immigration to appease their voters who are employers who need labour NOW. They cannot wait until after feminism is discredited, or when white British women decide to have enough children and bring them up properly, or when the education system is sorted out.  Michael Gove has been defeated on his proposals to raise standards of education, has he not?  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/michael-gove-forced-into-humiliating-uturn-over-ebacc-8484074.html

The government already know that five years - which is the length of a term in office - is not enough to sort that mess out. So they continue to sweep the dust under the carpet.

The white working classes hate Muslims because Muslims are visible and obviously different, while it is not immediately obvious that one of their own is a promiscuous woman and a mother of illegitimate variously-fathered feral children who go to sink schools and leave without qualifications making them unemployable and only fit for a life of crime and welfare dependency.

It is feminism which has created the need for immigrant labour, by lowering the standards of mothering and education in our Culture of Excuses and Entitlement.

It is easier for the white working classes to hate Muslims than to hate their own women -  however promiscuous - because most men who are not in a position to support a wife or are too mean to pay a prostitute will always welcome a cheap source of sex from any promiscuous female minded to give it to them cheap or free.  Men are only after one thing, after all!

The BNP are not prepared to criticise SSMs because most of their membership are the sons of SSMs. 

It would of course help if Muslims are prepared to criticise SSMs, but I have a feeling most Muslims do not want to be even more disliked than they are already. In this way, Muslims are slowly becoming like Jews, who want to prove that they are superior to every race because they are the only ones who follow the commandments of a moral and omnipotent God. Those who do not follow what their God commands will soon find themselves becoming weak and degenerate, in just the same way that a bright student who is not studious will inevitably fall behind to even an average student who is studious.  In the same way, Muslims will also eventually lose their traditions in an environment that is so clearly hostile to social conservatism ie the institutions of marriage and the family, that British Muslims too will be mocked for coming from the land that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland. 

While Muslims who now have the protection of their religion think gay marriage and being unmarried mothers will never happen to them, are they so sure it will not happen to their children and grandchildren? Most Muslims go to the same schools as the white non-Muslims  who are so gay, so promiscuous, so sexually liberated and welfare-dependent after all.

If Muslims want to be less disliked, they will have to demonstrate to the white working classes that it is their lack of religion and family values that makes them weaker than the newly-arrived Muslim immigrant. In short, they will have to warn the people whom they know hate and fear Muslims about the destructiveness of feminism to the institutions of marriage and the family.

However, I am sure no Muslim is prepared to do that. 

I am sure that the instinct of most Muslims is to say of the white non-Muslims whom they know  hate them: "Let them get weaker and more morally rotten, since they hate us so much. Nothing would please us more than to see them rot before our eyes in their stew of moral corruption of alcoholism, sexual liberation and gay marriage - all fueled by liberalism and feminism", while entirely forgetting their duty to enjoin good and forbid evil, as the Koran commands.  

It should be noted that Breivik has been identified as anti-feminist at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/27/breivik-anti-feminism  It is interesting that Muslims refuse to integrate into Western society because they don't want their children and grandchildren to end up as sexually liberated SSMs nor their sons gaily marrying each other nor ending up being divorced and homeless and having to return to live with their parents while deprived of access to their grandchildren by a spiteful ex-daughter-in-law.  The Far Right and Muslims face a common enemy: extremist feminism that desecrates the institutions of marriage and family.  It is the dead weight of feminism (which supports the right of women to be as promiscuous as men) that prevents frightened white men from criticising the worst of their women, who are promiscuous, parasitical and degenerate,even if they are in government and a member of the Cabinet.   The condition of the married white middle class liberal male politician is indeed pitiable and contemptible, for we now have politicians who are these days too afraid of discussing politics.   British Muslims may be forgiven, perhaps, for indulging in what the Germans would call  schadenfreude, and wishing to see the white man, who has bombed and invaded their countries and stolen their oil suffer just a little bit more.  However, what hurts the white man will eventually hurt them too, for they too live in the land of white people.    

I really do not think calling for more restrictions on the free speech of both Muslims and anyone who wishes to complain about immigration is going to help Muslims.  The white working classes need someone to hate for being overtaken and replaced by immigrants.  They need to hate someone whom their own government actually prefers to them.   After all, their own government cares so little about them that it refuses to even warn or advise them for their own good.   The political classes have so much contempt for the white working classes that they would rather throw money at them than tell them a few home truths or risk their careers by offending their slut and bastard voters whom no sane British employer would hire as an employee.

If Muslims want to improve things in Britain rather than merely have their revenge of the Far Right, they should point to the cause of Western malaise, instead of encouraging the government to impose more restrictions on all our freedoms - talk about going native!

Why should Muslims be afraid of offending the worst of women - the unmarried mothers of illegitimate offspring whose children are not a credit to them?  

They have gone native, or forgotten their Islamic duty to enjoin good and forbid evil, as the Koran commands.   Perhaps it is right that Muslims who neglect their duty to Allah do not prosper.  

Or they would go and like https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379?fref=ts

Sunday, 4 December 2011

Morrisons forced to retrain school-leavers


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8933350/Morrisons-forced-to-retrain-school-leavers.html

I see no harm in proposing - just like my hero Jeremy Clarkson did - that members of the female and feminist-dominated teaching profession be shot in front of their illegitimate children next time the go on strike.   The teaching profession of Britain have been unfit for purpose for decades.

It is after all the only language they understand in dumbed-down Britain.  

Thursday, 1 December 2011

Jeremy Clarkson as our Revolutionary Leader! Jeremy Clarkson for DICTATOR!


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15977813

Jeremy Clarkson and I should form a party and overthrow the whole fucking tower of SHIT.  

We will get covered in it the process but we will be doing the people a big fat favour and Britain will be better run after we have finished clearing up the mess.  

Let us call it the TOP GEAR PARTY!

Saturday, 8 May 2010

Post mortem on BNP wipe-out and recommendations for improvement

May 7 saw the wipe-out of the smaller parties, Respect and BNP:

In Bethnal Green & Bow as well as Poplar & Limehouse, RESPECT was comprehensively defeated by Labour.

Perhaps this is due to the electorate knowing that the party in government is more capable of delivering on its bribes than a minor party and cynically voting as the briber paid them to do.

The BNP do have a problem and they do not really know exactly why they are so despised. (It is not just because they are racist, though.)

All poor people are despised. Poor whites in this country are particularly despised because they remind liberals of the failure of their policies.

Helping poor starving Africans is always somehow more emotionally appealing than helping their own obese white single mothers on benefit with their variously-fathered children.

The BNP also have this other apparently insuperable problem - the fact that women are half the electorate.

Women at heart have a horror of poor low-status men. They find them frightening, if not actually repulsive. They are however prevented by PC from admitting this even to themselves, because they like to think of themselves as kind, compassionate and nurturing. The fact that these men are meant to be racist and therefore evil gives them an excuse to shun them, but, really, they are looking for a protector and a provider, or, not to put too fine a point on it, a meal ticket for life. A poor man represents an unattractive prospect in meal ticket terms.

Most women are not up to taking the flak that goes with being associated with being the spouse or girlfriend or even the platonic friend of a known racist.

Most men, who are only after One Thing and want to look after Number 1, know that it would be impolitic to allow themselves to be tainted by association with the poor and despised.

It would affect their career prospects and without a good job earning good money, women would shun them.

For one thing they wouldn't get any nookie.

Shag a racist girls? Er, thanks, but not today. Shag a poor racist whose education, training and values are so abysmal he cannot compete with foreigners? You can guess the answer.

MY RECOMMENDATIONS

  1. Attract the middle class vote.
  2. Make the party safe for people like Jeremy Clarkson, Rod Liddle, Peter Hitchens, Melanie Phillips.
  3. Be well-dressed and well-groomed.
  4. Challenge feminism. Women will hate you at first, but, if you offer them a viable alternative, they may even thank you for it later, and admire you for your courage.
  5. Forgive people like Jeremy Clarkson, Rod Liddle, Peter Hitchens, Melanie Phillips etc who have been kicking you in the teeth yet agreeing with your policies for years now but who keep saying how vile, nasty, racist, Nazi and evil the party is. (This is because they have dependents and are understandably reluctant of losing their jobs or being victimised by the Leftists who would destroy their reputations.)
  6. Make the party safe for people like Jeremy Clarkson etc and make it profitable for MPs of the more established parties to jump ship.
  7. Never mention repatriation of anyone except illegal immigrants.
  8. Never mention miscegenation again. Far easier to threaten to disown and disinherit any child of yours who offends you with his or her reproductive choice. (If you haven't even any property you could withhold from your hypothetical child to punish them for for going against your wishes, or if they just don't care what you think of them, then suffer the punishment of being a useless parent whom your child neither loves nor fears!)
  9. Promise the return of fault in divorce so your ex-wife isn't entitled to half your property and able to deprive you of your children when you have really done nothing wrong and she is just bored and irritated with you.
  10. Use IC codes at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IC_codes to distinguish Britons of all races. White people are Number 1, by the way! No more distinction between ethnic and civic Britons because that would be "racist" but really because it is divisive.
  11. Offer training courses in social graces with a special membership discount.
  12. Offer training courses in grooming and dressing with a special membership discount.
  13. Offer training courses in public speaking with a special membership discount.
  14. Interview all potential members, allowing admission only to those who fulfill minimal standards of the above-mentioned qualities.
  15. Offer membership of the BNP Debating Society with a special membership discount.
  16. Offer ballroom dancing classes with a special membership discount.
  17. Offer the services of a marriage bureau including the drafting of a BNP marriage contract (rather like a Muslim marriage contract http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2009/03/muslim-marriage-contract.html) with a special membership discount.
  18. Offer the services of a marital relationship bureau with a special membership discount.
  19. Offer the services of a marital dissolution service with fairer terms to men (and quite similar to Muslim divorces where custody is awarded to men after the child reaches a certain age unless there are compelling reasons for not so doing) than is currently available from UK family courts, with a special membership discount.
  20. Offer courses at a Wives and Mothers Training School for aspiring wives and mothers, with a special membership discount.
  21. Establish a BNP travel club where members of all races could bond with each other while visiting and learning about different countries and cultures.
  22. A BNP clothes shop with well-cut clothes that are modest and elegant that members could wear like uniform - if they so wished - so they never make a sartorial error ever again, with a special membership discount.
  23. A BNP Cookbook consisting of the favourite recipes of members, with a special membership discount. (This could become a collectors' item!)
  24. Change the BNP logo to something resembling the Tesco one using the same fonts and colours to give the impression of being an organisation that is getting bigger and better.
  25. Have some over-arching big idea - such as a one-party state that affirms the principle of a small state and limited government under a narrower taxpayer-only franchise which properly protects the rights of its members against the leader and his cronies and operates government by referenda AKA direct democracy.
  26. State in no uncertain terms that if the working classes want British jobs for British workers, they had better do what they are supposed to do and start working again, to the extent of even taking a crap job that they feel is beneath them and demeaning, such as picking fruit and cleaning toilets, without pissing off their employers and telling them how well they know their rights.
Eric Hoffer:

"The most effective way to silence our guilty conscience is to convince ourselves and others that those we have sinned against are indeed depraved creatures, deserving every punishment, even extermination. We cannot pity those we have wronged, nor can we be indifferent toward them. We must hate and persecute them or else leave the door open to self-contempt."


The Nazis did it to the Jews. White liberals do it to their own working classes. If they could they would press a button that would exterminate all the white urban proletariat by blowing them up in their tower blocks, and swiftly replace them with foreign workers rather than have to go to the trouble of teaching the white working classes anything worth learning that would make them employable. To use tried and trusted traditional teaching methods or discipline would after all be "fascist" and they would rather die than give up any part of their self-image of compassion and tolerance.

The sky may fall around their ears and their civilisation in the process of being destroyed, yet they would still cling slavishly to the idea of indiscriminate tolerance and compassion for the feckless, criminal and viciously destructive.

Liberals are as evil as the Nazis in the sense that they both harmed the very people they were meant to help. It is the 21st century version of human sacrifice.

Saturday, 25 July 2009

Jeremy Clarkson for Prime Minister?

He is after all the unacknowledged No 1 Alpha Male of our Great British Nation and already internationally known for his bad boy exploits with the internal combustion engine.

He is tall, manly, speaks his mind, and is not frightened of turbo-charging his words and actions with thrilling bursts of testosterone.

Women love that, and men do too. They would both probably do anything for him. He could even be our Fuhrer ...

Most people would choose Clarkson, if push came to shove, but I remain steadfastly loyal to my choice of Lord Mandelson. When a man has my admiration, he has my admiration until he does something to forfeit it.

Britain's No 1 Alpha Male Says The One Who Holds Official Title is a C-word

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jul/24/jeremy-clarkson-offensive-comments-brown

Looks like the knives are out again for Gordon. I suspect Clarkson's verdict will have more of an effect on Gordon's future as leader than the combined voices of Barry Sheerman, Charles Clarke and the whole dang Labour Party.

We all know that Clarkson is the Nation's Number One Alpha Male. If Clarkson told us to vote BNP, I think enough of us just would ...

The other Alpha Male contender is of course Lord Mandelson, whom I hope will soon be Lord of the Labour Party as well as First Lord of the Treasury ...

Monday, 22 September 2008

The British National Sport of Whingeing

I have been taken to ask by for suggesting that workmen and women whinge, and suspected of misogyny, illiberalism and goodness knows what else. Perhaps I should just have said that all poms whinge and are known in Australasia as "whingeing Poms". This is undeniable, thankfully.

"Australia is where you go when you’ve made a mess of everything. That’s why the 1.3m Brits who live there are known as whingeing Poms. Because they’re all failures.

Another popular destination is Spain, which is home these days to 761,000 Brits. Are they all brain surgeons? Inventors? Did Sir Christopher Cockerell invent the hovercraft and then move to Puerto Banus? No. Spain is where you go when you’ve sold your taxi."

For the rest of Jeremy Clarkson's piece on why it is pointless even to leave the country (expat existence is not all it's cracked out to be, apparently), go to:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/jeremy_clarkson/article2326687.ece

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...