@AnthonyLarme Marriage and rational female preferences were the two filters of the next generation. Now feminism has utterly destroyed both.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@ntfem Agreed - and many in the MRM would likewise concur
— Anthony Larme (@AnthonyLarme) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme MRMs should stop calling themselves MRMs and instead call themselves antifeminists. War needs to be declared on feminism.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The only credit I am prepared to give @MikeBuchanan11 is that he dared to call himself an antifeminist.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The attractions of purely recreational sex cannot be underestimated in a cultural n political environment of sexual liberation
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme When you think about it, human females AKA sluts actually make LESS RATIONAL reproductive decisions than LOWER ANIMALS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme Females of the animal kingdom do not have casual sex. The stakes are too high for them and so they choose very carefully.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme The least a female animal can do is choose the father of her offspring for strength, size or some positive characteristic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
Now, a slut going clubbing on the pull would choose a male sex partner for the size of his sex organ, knowing nothing about him. She might have sex in a toilet with him and possibly find herself knocked up a few months later, having forgotten even his name, if indeed he gave her his real name at the time.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1182373/Welcome-binge-Britain-Polish-photographer-documents-years-drunken-revelry-Cardiff.html
@AnthonyLarme Marriage and rational female preferences were the two filters of the next generation. Now feminism has utterly destroyed both.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme If the female is foolish she would have been constrained by family pressure from marrying the coachman, so to speak.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
An adolescent aristocratic female is likely to find her coachman more attractive than males of her own class. Familiarity breeds contempt, after all. Coachmen would be hired on the basis of their looks. Should an aristocratic father allow his daughter to marry or fuck as she pleases? What do you think, dear reader?
@AnthonyLarme The safeguards that existed before: shame, parental pressure, a sense of self-preservation/-interest are all but destroyed now
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme There really is nothing now to stop the stupid irresponsible promiscuous female from doing exactly as she pleases.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
@AnthonyLarme So, really, all the sex education anyone really needs is contained in 4:15, 4:16 and 24:2 of the Koran. NOTHING ELSE NEEDED.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 18, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment