Translate

Showing posts with label sex education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sex education. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 October 2018

Preventing Child Indoctrination - Creating a better Education system


MY COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Are you all atheists?

Why is Mike Buchanan getting involved in covert displays of antisemitism and Islamophobia by banning male circumcision instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?

If most British men were married fathers in control of their families, feminists would not have seized control of the educational system and would not now be indoctrinating British children with ways of having extramarital and underage sex as well as becoming members of the opposite sex.

Did anyone mention abolishing no fault divorce?

If none of you have any prospect of becoming fathers of legitimate children, what are the reasons?

Did anyone mention criminalising fornication to make men take marriage seriously again?

Do you realise that men who are considered unmarriageable are considered lower in status than married fathers of legitimate children?

Have you considered how and why Jewish and Muslim men are more likely to marry and stay married than atheist men?

In a matriarchy, women would control the educational syllabus. That is why public education is now institutional child sexual abuse. That is why primary school children are being given sex education and told they could become a member of the opposite sex if they seek treatment early enough, while they are adolescents, before they become adults.

Low status unmarriageable and atheist beta male victims of feminism who follow an angry bitter charmless man like Mike Buchanan who is more interested in showing covert hostility to Jews and Muslims by campaigning to ban male circumcision assisted by an unmarried mother rather than campaigning to abolish no fault divorce have no chance of overthrowing the matriarchy, have they?

Is the reason why no one is interested in abolishing no fault divorce conclusive evidence that you are all unmarriageable and therefore have no interest or prospect of getting married?  If this is so, then you are low status men. If you are indeed low status men, why would anyone listen to you?

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 7 April 2016

Sex education in an Islamic State

004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

004.023
YUSUFALI: Prohibited to you (For marriage) are:- Your mothers, daughters, sisters; father's sisters, Mother's sisters; brother's daughters, sister's daughters; foster-mothers (Who gave you suck), foster-sisters; your wives' mothers; your step-daughters under your guardianship, born of your wives to whom ye have gone in,- no prohibition if ye have not gone in;- (Those who have been) wives of your sons proceeding from your loins; and two sisters in wedlock at one and the same time, except for what is past; for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful;-
PICKTHAL: Forbidden unto you are your mothers, and your daughters, and your sisters, and your father's sisters, and your mother's sisters, and your brother's daughters and your sister's daughters, and your foster-mothers, and your foster-sisters, and your mothers-in-law, and your step-daughters who are under your protection (born) of your women unto whom ye have gone in - but if ye have not gone in unto them, then it is no sin for you (to marry their daughters) - and the wives of your sons who (spring) from your own loins. And (it is forbidden unto you) that ye should have two sisters together, except what hath already happened (of that nature) in the past. Lo! Allah is ever Forgiving, Merciful.
SHAKIR: Forbidden to you are your mothers and your daughters and your sisters and your paternal aunts and your maternal aunts and brothers' daughters and sisters' daughters and your mothers that have suckled you and your foster-sisters and mothers of your wives and your step-daughters who are in your guardianship, (born) of your wives to whom you have gone in, but if you have not gone in to them, there is no blame on you (in marrying them), and the wives of your sons who are of your own loins and that you should have two sisters together, except what has already passed; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

004.024
YUSUFALI: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
PICKTHAL: And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
SHAKIR: And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise.

004.025
YUSUFALI: If any of you have not the means wherewith to wed free believing women, they may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess: And Allah hath full knowledge about your faith. Ye are one from another: Wed them with the leave of their owners, and give them their dowers, according to what is reasonable: They should be chaste, not lustful, nor taking paramours: when they are taken in wedlock, if they fall into shame, their punishment is half that for free women. This (permission) is for those among you who fear sin; but it is better for you that ye practise self-restraint. And Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And whoso is not able to afford to marry free, believing women, let them marry from the believing maids whom your right hands possess. Allah knoweth best (concerning) your faith. Ye (proceed) one from another; so wed them by permission of their folk, and give unto them their portions in kindness, they being honest, not debauched nor of loose conduct. And if when they are honourably married they commit lewdness they shall incur the half of the punishment (prescribed) for free women (in that case). This is for him among you who feareth to commit sin. But to have patience would be better for you. Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And whoever among you has not within his power ampleness of means to marry free believing women, then (he may marry) of those whom your right hands possess from among your believing maidens; and Allah knows best your faith: you are (sprung) the one from the other; so marry them with the permission of their masters, and give them their dowries justly, they being chaste, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours; and when they are taken in marriage, then if they are guilty of indecency, they shall suffer half the punishment which is (inflicted) upon free women. This is for him among you who fears falling into evil; and that you abstain is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.
at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Monday, 18 May 2015

Marriage acted as a constraint on the degenerative consequences of casual sex


Now, a slut going clubbing on the pull would choose a male sex partner for the size of his sex organ, knowing nothing about him. She might have sex in a toilet with him and possibly find herself knocked up a few months later, having forgotten even his name, if indeed he gave her his real name at the time.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1182373/Welcome-binge-Britain-Polish-photographer-documents-years-drunken-revelry-Cardiff.html


An adolescent aristocratic female is likely to find her coachman more attractive than males of her own class. Familiarity breeds contempt, after all. Coachmen would be hired on the basis of their looks. Should an aristocratic father allow his daughter to marry or fuck as she pleases? What do you think, dear reader?

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 14 April 2015

LGBTs have a hissy fit at me because of a misunderstanding

https://twitter.com/ntfem/status/587747044124712960

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/protesting-parents-ask-wynne-to-scrap-new-sex-ed-curriculum/article23961650

Under the changes, Grade 3 students [children from 8 to 9]  will learn about same-sex relationships, kids in Grades 4 [children from 9 to 10] and up will learn more about the dangers of online bullying, while the dangers of sexting will come in Grade 7 [children from 12 to 13].
Lessons about puberty will move from Grade 5 [children from 10 to 11] to Grade 4, while masturbation and “gender expression” are mentioned in the Grade 6 curriculum.

Come on. isn't the Caliphate better than our pornocracy of  a government literally fucking with our children's minds? Who do you think will be teaching our children Sex Ed? Slut female or sex predator male teachers who will think nothing of seducing your adolescent son or daughter, probably.

In the UK anyone who wants to teach at a state school has to undergo a full year of teacher training indoctrination about how it is OK to be gay if you're a man and super to be a slut if you are female.

Haven't you had enough?
Muslims don't put up with this shittification of standards of sexual morality, so why should we?
http://www.afa.net/action-alerts/if-your-childs-school-allows-day-of-silence-keep-your-child-at-home-april-17/ has  more gay shit at schools. 
TYPO: "old" = "told"


http://www.churchmilitant.tv/scripts/vort-2015-04-13.pdf

HOMO HEGEMONY IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND EVERYWHERE ELSE, AIDED AND ABETTED BY FEMINAZIS IN KEY OR PIVOTAL POSITIONS

Michael Voris:

" ... much of the Catholic clergy is homosexual.

And the reason so much of the clergy is gay is because the seminaries and vocation directors and chanceries are busting at the seams with homosexuals.

They are the ones who surround bishops, for example, and “counsel” them—the bishops who aren’t gay themselves, that is. They run various key departments in the chancery,
and they see to it that their own get appointed in key or pivotal positions."


Who is Chief Feminazi in the UK?

The Directrix of Public Prosecutions in the UK Alison Saunders. Men haven't got a chance.

John Humphrys points out the campaigning statement of feminazi Alison Saunders who wants to raise the numbers of convictions of men accused of rape

THINGS TO BEAR IN MIND ABOUT LIVING IN A MATRIARCHY


  1. In a matriarchy, all men are lower than Slut Single Mothers. Keith Joseph's career was destroyed in 1974 when he criticised Slut Single Mothers. That was the beginning of the end. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron 
  2. In a matriarchy homosexual men are above heterosexual men because only they dare to say things heterosexual men are too afraid to say about women eg David Starkey, Stephen Fry. They dare to criticise women because they are not bothered if women withhold sex from them. 
  3. In a matriarchy even the Prime Minister is afraid of sluts because they all have the vote and have used it to devastating effect when they voted New Labour in. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8555358.stm Women considered Tony Blair sexier than John Major, obviously. Guess who will be the new leader of the Labour Party after Ed Miliband loses the 2015 General Election? Guess who middle class female Labour members find sexiest and whose **** they most want to suck? As Janusz Korwin-Mikke said at “Women usually vote for the more handsome man" Pity the beta male who cannot even choose his own leader without omega females - who are very libtard - influencing the vote. We know who voted New Labour and the Democrats in, don't we? Stupid irresponsible parasitical women with no jobs or public sector non-jobs. http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2012-07-18.html
  4. Alpha males (eg US President, UK Prime Minister) are more preoccupied with appeasing the omega female SSM voter and keeping her voting than looking after the interests of the beta male who do all the work. That is the democratic process for you in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage.
  5. Will any politician be proposing to disenfranchise non-taxpayers? What do you think, dear reader, knowing of the pussy-whipped cowardice, corruption and competence of the average Western politician? 
  6. Beta males will not accept the authority of another beta male and that was why John Major's Cabinet were always rebelling against him.  
  7. Beta males would rather choose a female they find attractive to be their leader than another beta male. 
  8. Attractive people are more often than not vain, shallow, lazy and unprincipled.
  9. Women will always conspire to lower standards of sexual morality if ever given the opportunity. This is probably because they are incapable of abstract thought because they are just not interested in the longevity and strength of their civilisation or the long term national interest, or just selfish, stupid and evil. Lowering standards of sexual morality would let them off the hook while raising standards would result in most women being shamed as sluts. 
  10. 83% of female MPs voted for gay marriage while only 48% of male MPs did. What does this say about feminism?
  11. You have to be pretty stupid ugly smelly and nasty as a woman for a man to say no if you are offering them no-strings sex. Men are of course the weaker sex when it comes to saying no to no-strings sex.
  12. Saying it is OK for women to be sluts - as a matriarchy would - invariably lowers standards of everything else, eg education, morality. 
  13. A matriarchy or pornocracy is a society in which most women are sluts whose power base is built on the desire men have for sex with sluts. Women use sex to control men and sluts are the main suppliers of sex to men in a matriarchy. In a patriarchy most of the sex that would take place is married sex and sex with prostitutes. This explains why evil feminazi sluts want to undermine marriage and criminalise men for buying sex from prostitutes (so as to keep them continuing to get sex from sluts) while encouraging primary schoolchildren with their Sex Ed to fuck whoever whenever wherever as long as it feels good to keep that whole shitty shebang of their stinking pornocracy banging and chuntering on. 
  14. Shaming sluts would discourage women who don't want to be shamed as sluts into withholding sex forcing men to up their game thereby raising standards. 
  15. The shittier women are to men the more of them will go gay or paedo.
  16. Deep down men are afraid of women because they know they are not supposed to hit or rape women but understandably don't want to be bullied and mocked by women.
  17. Are you beginning to get why Muslims don't want to integrate into this kind of shit and have their daughters become SSMs, their sons gaily married or if married to a woman divorced for no good reason and lose access to their grandchildren because their vengeful ex-daughter-in-law wants to punish them? Do you now understand why so many of them would rather die fighting for ISIS than live in a society where all men are lower than Slut Single Mothers because they are afraid to criticise them? Did you know that the US President himself - supposedly the most powerful man on earth - is afraid of SSMs because they all have the vote?
  18. When  most men in the West become gay, or unemployed losers because their jobs have been taken by women or contemptible pussy-whipped MCSFs or paedophiles, ISIS will come and take us over. 

You would have thought that all right-thinking people would agree that what I am saying is quite important and ought to be more widely discussed.

Why isn't it?

MPs would be too afraid of antagonising their slut, SSM, MCSF and SPOSSM voters. This is of course the corrupt and craven nature of our much-vaunted democratic process.

What is an SSM?

What is an MCSF and a SPOSSM?

Why isn't the media discussing it?

Have you noticed that almost every other BBC producer is female and possibly a feminazi protected by pro-feminist legislation?  

Self-censorship is much  more insidious than overt censorship. If there is overt censorship people would just try to get round the rules. If it is self-censorship people won't even touch the subject for fear of someone (eg a female they fancy) taking a dislike to them. 

Why isn't UKIP discussing it?

Because UKIP are just as terrified as the LibLabCon of antagonising voters who regard extramarital sex as a God-given right.

What do you think is going to happen if the slut problem continues to be ignored?

What do you think will happen to you if you suspect you have cancer but refuse to go to the doctor?
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Compare and Contrast Muslim and BNP attitudes towards primary education


Fundraising Event in support of an Islamic education centre providing high quality but affordable primary schooling. By attending this event you will be helping to cuitivate the next generation of Muslims.


Highlights include:


* A luxury Three Course Meal
* Inspiring talks 
* Creche available for children over 3


It promises to be an enjoyable, memorable event for all the family.


Tickets are priced at £40.


This message I received suggests to me that Muslims think British education is degenerate and don't want to have anything to do with the kind of sex education that is being taught to primary school children or have anything to do with the children of slut and bastard non-Muslim working class whites.

Can we really blame them?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/8788444/Primaries-forced-to-give-sex-education-to-be-Healthy-Schools.html

Does the BNP say anything about education, culture and morality? Does it fuck.

Its leader is too busy exposing his sex organ to women who lead him on to think about things like that.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/posts/view/237450/Ex-model-says-BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin-exposed-himself/

After his expose in the Sunday Star, BNP men appear to be saying that if a woman leads you on, you can do no other than to follow her to your doom.

It would appear that they "think" with their sex organ while they fuck up their brains with sex and drugs and rock and roll when they are not busy blaming Muslims, Jews and foreigners for their degradation.

They are certainly too pussywhipped to blame their slut and bastard women.

They are too afraid to blame their slut and bastard women because they don't want to offend the SSMs from whom they are hoping for some cheap and easy sex.

Interesting that these Muslims with proper jobs and legitimate children can afford fund-raising meals like this while it is clearly beyond the reach of the typical BNP member who doesn't give two hoots about education or the future of their illegitimate children.

If the BNP are not whingeing about Muslims, the typical BNP supporter is just not interested.

All the typical BNP member cares about is how to extract the most from the welfare state before they pop their clogs, not to mention having as much sex as possible with as many sluts who will let them have sex with them.

Not just the typical BNP member either. Atheist liberals tend only to care about how much pleasure and benefits they can extract from the state before they die.

That is why the typical BNP member - who is mostly working class and atheist - isn't interested in reforming the welfare system or criticising SSMs.

While some may even acknowledge that SSMs supported by the welfare state have done the morals of the white working classes no good at all, they are not in favour of doing anything about it, because it would  upset too many of their slut and bastard core supporters.

Most atheists - especially atheists without children for whom they feel any parental affection - cannot think in terms of posterity or the long-term national interest, or anything beyond their miserable self-interested little lives.

Nationalism must mean the moral regeneration of the British people, or it will never amount to anything.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, 6 December 2010

How the teaching establishment is like Hitler

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9259000/9259008.stm

0818
Is the English language being mutilated by the recent trend to turn nouns into verbs? Journalist Anthony Gardner and Elaine Higgleton, editorial director of Harper Collins English Dictionaries, discuss developments in modern languages.  


The English language is being mutilated by the fact that teachers dare not teach and when they do teach they do not teach the basics of grammar and punctuation. It is the lower classes who are most disadvantaged by this progress liberal "educational" policy, when no one wants to hire these badly schooled people and prefer to hire foreigners. It often strikes me that the liberals are like Hitler.  They hurt most the people they claim they most want to help. Hitler wanted to help the German nation and the Germans, but only ended up heaping disgrace and defeat upon them.

Is the British teaching establishment not positively Hitlerian, through not teaching them properly, the scarcity of single sex state schools and stuffing them with sex education through all orifices at ever earlier ages?   

How is the British teaching establishment like Hitler is quite easily explained.  What motivates them to do so  is not quite so easily explained.  
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, 13 September 2009

UNESCO report proposes teaching children to masturbate

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,543203,00.html

The UNESCO report, called "International Guidelines for Sexuality Education," separates children into four age groups: 5-to-8-year-olds, 9-to-12-year-olds, 12-to-15-year-olds and 15-to-18-year-olds.

Under the U.N.'s voluntary sex-ed regime, kids just 5-8 years old will be told that "touching and rubbing one's genitals is called masturbation" and that private parts "can feel pleasurable when touched by oneself."

By the time they're 9 years old, they'll learn about "positive and negative effects of 'aphrodisiacs," and wrestle with the ideas of "homophobia, transphobia and abuse of power."

At 12, they'll learn the "reasons for" abortions — but they'll already have known about their safety for three years.

When they're 15, they'll be exposed to direct "advocacy to promote the right to and access to safe abortion."

UNESCO officials said the guidelines were "co-authored by two leading experts in the field of sexuality education" — Dr. Doug Kirby, an adolescent sexuality expert, and Nanette Ecker, the former director of international education and training at the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Kirby

Nanette Ecker is on Facebook and is pictured with another woman, which suggests that Nanette Ecker is an out and about lesbian, not that I have anything against these people.

Not that any of the above has anything to do with anything at all. Or does it?

Perhaps Dr Kirby might have a few recommendations about demonstrating the pleasures of masturbation to his attentive young learners. Perhaps he fantasises about how he might like this to be done, and how his eager pupils might demonstrate the fact that they have taken on board what he has taught them. He might even imagine what he could do to assist them in their endeavours ...

All this might suggest that he is a pervert or a paedophile, but I am not saying anything ....
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Why the British are either very stupid or very demented

http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8160000/8160335.stm

This is the running order of today's Today programme with my comments saying why we are a country of consisting of demented old women being governed by a bunch of demented old women whose opposition is another bunch of feeble-minded old women.


0752
A 22-year-old man from east London who began binge-drinking at 13 has died after being denied a life-saving liver transplant. Professor Ian Gilmore, president of the Royal College of Physicians, explains the story of Gary Reinbach, who was given only a few weeks to live after developing cirrhosis of the liver.

"Good!" is my response to the ritual hand-wringing. Does anyone in his right mind even think this alcoholic loser even deserves chicken liver pate on toast?


0810
Britain's professions have become more socially exclusive, a report
into social mobility suggests. Former cabinet minister Alan Milburn, the author of the report, discusses his findings.

Well, of course. Knowing what we do about Britain's state comprehensives, which 80% of children attend, why would anyone give these crap-educated children the time of day at all? Most of them can't barely read, write, spell or count. The ones that can count a little are wobbly on their time tables. Everything is being progressively dumbed-down, even as the educational establishment pretends that children must be getting cleverer because more of them are getting grades that say they have got A and A*.

That is because they think we have been dumbed-down too.

In British schools, sex education consists of teaching children the Joy of Sex, ie telling them how to do it, instead of telling them that bringing yet another little bastard into the world is a bad thing for them and a bad thing for the society they live in.

Yet, mildly suggest that child benefit be withdrawn from these teen parents, and you get a chorus of disapproval, because it sounds uncompassionate.

The preponderence of the inadequately-parented illegitimate in our schools means that education must be progressively dumbed-down to accommodate their propensity for indiscipline, underaged sex and violence, obesity, autism, violence and neurosis.

But no one mentions or acknowledges this, of course.


0832
The head of the army, General Sir Richard Dannatt, is said to have
infuriated ministers last week by publicly calling for more troops and better equipment in Afghanistan. Today presenter Sarah Montague reports from Afghanistan and talks to Sir Richard about his last journey to Afghanistan before he retires after 40 years of service.

Well, good on you for standing up for the cannon-fodder, General, but there is really no point throwing good money after bad, and sending more people to die in the 21st century Western equivalent of the Peloponnesian War while you're about it. (You know, the one that Athens and Sparta waged with each other for 28 years and which ultimately destroyed Athens.)

0838
Despite overall crime falling by 5% in 2008/9, the fear of crime seems
to go on rising. Filmmaker Roger Graef, who has tried to answer that question in a programme for BBC One, explains why people are more fearful than they used to be.
Because even dumbed-down Britons are not so dumbed-down that they would believe any government statistic now, to give them some credit ...

0851
Universities should take into account the social background of the
people who apply for courses, a report into social mobility suggests. Shaun Bailey, a youth worker and prospective Conservative party candidate for Hammersmith, and Dr Lee Elliot Major, research director at the Sutton Trust, discuss whether working class pupils should be given special consideration.
If working class people are going to be given a hand-up because they can't quite make it on their own merits - who would want someone from the Peckham Academy in their university unless they start running a course in Degree Level Drug-Dealing, Pimping, Gun Crime and General Gangsterism - why not give a hand-up to lunatics, retards and those suffering from dementia?

Why not indeed?

What a pity there is no dementia test we can make our leaders take, to show how utterly divorced they are from reality, morality and anything that could be described as responsibility and good sense.

If we do not do anything about this, then even death by swine flu is too good for us.

The latest insane suggestion - that schools that would re-open in autum be closed to contain the pandemic - suggests that even the demented know this and are trying to escape their fate by proposing what they think might be solutions.

Let us therefore just speak the truth to each other before the filth and madness that we have accumulated for so long falls on us and buries us alive.

It is the only way to enjoy our last days, is it not?
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...