London BNP Organisers not happy about Carlos Cortiglia being 2012 London Mayoral Candidate

http://web.archive.org/web/20040807070821/http://www.lanacion.com.ar/coberturaespecial/argentinos/inglaterra/NotaMostrar.asp?nota_id=552379

http://advanced-ape.com/2011/09/bnp-appoints-oddity-carlos-cortiglia-for-london-mayoralty/

One of the mayoral candidates - whose application was rejected - writes:

"I have just returned from a very pleasant social function in London. The function was attended by more than twenty British National Party activists. 

One of those present was a member of the panel selected to choose the Mayoral Candidate.

The panel member stated that from an original list of eleven applicants, a short list of five were chosen for interview. 

Before any interviews could be held however, Steve Squire, London Regional Organiser informed the panel that no interviews were necessary as Mr Griffin had decided that Carlos Cortiglia was to be the Mayoral Candidate.

There are many rumours circulating across the internet that Carlos had volunteered to fight against the British in the Falklands War in 1982. 

Next year, the year that the elections will take place, also happens to be the thirtieth anniversay of the Falklands War.

It begs the question. DID MR GRIFFIN DO THIS DELIBERATELY?

One member present made the comment that Mr Griffin knows that he is finished so he intends to finish off the British National Party as well. You will have to make up your own minds on that.  

One thing is for certain. 

Most people at the function stated it was a very bad decision and that Carlos would get no help from any of them.

They urge Carlos to stand down as the candidate, for fear of the further damage he will do to the British National Party when these facts are placed in the public domain in the run up to the election.

Regards,
Michael Barnbrook"

It is very sad that the party does not appear to have followed its own rules or has everything pushed through from on high. It is bound to make people feel ill-used.

Procedural impropriety comes to mind since Carlos was originally on the selection panel for the London Mayoral Candidate.

Or perhaps there was no procedural propriety because there never was never any agreed procedure for selection, was there?  This is because everyone knew that whatever and whoever was decided, the Chairman has the power of veto.

On this occasion, it appeared that no attempt was made to select a candidate from the applicants.  There had been no formal interview of any of them.  

Whatever happened to playing by the rules and fair play that the English used to be famous for?

Were they all eaten up by Slut Single Mums and their bastards of Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland?

The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.

(Let it not be forgotten that I was expelled from the BNP, not for racial reasons, but at the behest of a BNP member who is a Slut Single Mum with disabled offspring who took offence at my views on Slut Single Mums, and who then bounced the Chairman into expelling me, thereby depriving the BNP of the best London Mayoral Candidate they could ever hope to have.  The candidate I would most enthusiastically support is their East End Organiser Jeffrey Marshall. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/09/jeffrey-marshall-to-replace-carlos.html )

How can the morals of the British nation be trusted when both the LibLabCon and its opposition are in thrall to the Slut Single Mum?

The Slut Single Mum AKA The Never Married Single Mum is a woman who 

1. is so stupid that she imagines that a man not her husband she is having sex with really wants to pay for any illegitimate offspring she may produce as a result of a casual act of copulation
2. is promiscuous
3. is incompetent at contraception
4. is negligent at contraception
5. intentionally wishes to be impregnated by a man not her husband
6. makes poor reproductive choices and expects to be pitied and paid for her stupidity
7. cannot manage to have sex with a man who is either in a position to or wishes to marry her
8. thinks it is OK to be impregnated by a man she does not wish to marry
9. believes that she and her illegitimate offspring have a right to be supported by the British taxpayer
10. is right in thinking that the liberal political establishment is too afraid to criticise her because so many Slut Single Mums like her now have the vote
11. is responsible for the fact that more than half the babies born in Britain are now bastards
12. is responsible for breeding the next generation of criminal bastards  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1572446/Most-British-babies-now-born-outside-marriage.html such as the feral variously-fathered bastards that rioted and looted in England this summer
13. is responsible for the alarmingly low standards of morality and education that prevail in Britain now
14. rules the Western world (for it is her hand that rocks the cradle)

(It is therefore not at all surprising that the morals and educational standards of the British are now at an all-time low and will become even lower even more quickly, until British men and British women will start sniffing at each other's bottoms in public just as dogs might in the park, before copulating in public, in broad daylight.

You have been warned.)

2012 UKIP London Mayoral Candidates: Paul Oakley clearly front runner

UKIP's front-running 2012 London Mayoral Candidate: Paul  Oakley

http://www.indhome.com/londonmayor/?page_id=180 has the list prospective UKIP 2012 London mayoral candidates.

I have voted for Paul Oakley and wish him every success. It is a shame it took him so long to move from Tory to UKIP. He was the one who tore up the Maastricht Treaty at a Young Conservatives meeting in 1993.

http://www.itnsource.com/shotlist/ITN/1993/02/07/BSP070293015/?s=conservative+conference+maastricht&st=0&pn=1

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:02 pm said of DAVID COBURN:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Obviously reading speech which is rather unprofessional.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:10 pm said of MICHAEL CORBY:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Reading from speech so rather unprofessional. Delivery rather manic and aggressive because of frantic nodding for purpose of emphasis.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:15 pm said of MICHAEL McGOUGH:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
I have met Michael McGough a few times and know what a nice man he is, but the speech was clearly read, and read without much conviction. The swaying shoulders suggested a certain infirmity of purpose.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:21 pm said of WINSTON McKENZIE:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
UKIP’s prospective Mayor of Rap has all the gestures and vocabulary of gangsta rap. FRIGHTENING.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:25 pm said of LAWRENCE WEBB:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Good looking chap but delivery rather hesitant and dull.

Claire Khaw on August 7, 2011 at 12:34 pm said of PAUL OAKLEY:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
PHWOAR. Says all the rights things and presses all the right buttons with his skinhead good looks and his recklessly generous offer to donate half his mayoral salary to charity. He ends with a seductive promise of consultative humility. Did you know how once tore up the Maastricht Treaty with his BARE HANDS as a Young Conservative? Only Claire Khaw (whose wedding he attended) could beat him now, and she wouldn’t feel the need to promise to donate half her mayoral salary either.


There is however a question mark on Paul's political judgement and ability to work with other Eurosceptics in other parties.

Below is his response when I asked him if he cared to point out to the powers that be in UKIP that the prohibition against ex-BNP members from joining is in fact ultra vires at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/08/ukip-prohibition-against-ex-bnp-members.html

"Nope! I haven't studied the background to this so am not sure that I agree with your interpretation. Anyway - I support the policy for two reasons. Firstly, I'm not interested in racial politics in the slightest and don't want UKIP being tainted with it. Secondly, if there was an open-door policy for BNP members then the left would inevitably jump on this to divert attention from the prime reason for the existence of UKIP: to get us out of the EU. In short, I can't see any advantage at all to us in admitting BNP members. In fact, it would be disadvantage all the way. Sorry Claire."

It is of course no surprise at all that Paul should think this way. It took him long enough to move over to UKIP (which he only did this year), suggesting that he is a hesitant kind of man, afraid to take risks and venture out of his political comfort zone. He was a Eurosceptic and we met in 1993 during Bill Cash MP's campaign to oppose the Maastricht Treaty in the House of Lords Committee Stage.  He also thought Michael Howard was a good man to lead the Conservative Party even as I said that his slow sly smile would not serve him well in a country that is neurotically both consciously and unconsciously anti-Semitic.

He opposed the death penalty and probably still opposes it now.

Perhaps he is one of those people who prefer the Eurosceptic movement to be divided and ineffective and sees no long term harm in this. Perhaps he thinks UKIP alone is capable of being a viable opposition to the LibLabCon all by itself.

Perhaps he is one of those many white middle class men in British politics who is terrified of being called a racist and therefore easily intimidated by the Liberal Left.

If so, then one must call into question his judgement, his courage and his ability to respond swiftly and ruthlessly in a fast-changing and increasingly volatile political environment, foreign and domestic.

I cannot attend a meeting of prospective mayoral candidates because I have been suspended from the BNP

On 27 June, I received an email stating that

"It's my duty to inform you that as a result of your cyber activities, you have been reported to the executive disciplinary committee for bringing the party into disrepute."

On the same day I received a notice of my suspension which means I cannot attend any meetings, and in particular the meeting at which prospective mayoral candidates will be selected.  It states:

"Your membership of the British National Party has been suspended, pending an investigation into alleged serious breaches of the BNP Code of Conduct.

While suspended you may not take part in any Party event, attend meetings or send circulars that give the impression that you hold any position within the Party. You are required to fully comply with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Party constitution.

Failure to comply with these requirements could result in your expulsion from membership of the Party, and Civil or Criminal proceedings being taken against you.


You will be informed of the outcome of the investigation in due course."

I asked:

"Do I have the right to defend myself and be told what I am accused of?"

The response I received:

"We are in the investigatory period at the moment.  We will keep you informed of developments."

I guess the answer is "No" then. 

It  was the former North East Organiser Chez Dunn who reported my comments on the Facebook wall of Charlotte Lewis, another former BNP organiser who is now also suspended pending an investigation. 

Charlotte and I were expressing surprise and disappointment at how few nationalists now appear to believe in family values.  She also agreed with me that if she were to have a severely disabled baby, she would not wish to bring it up either and agreed with my solution, which was to dispose of it myself ie commit infanticide, if the midwife would not dispose of it for us.  This was indeed common practice as evidenced at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwifery#Early_Historical_Perspective

"After the delivery, the midwife made the initial call on whether or not an infant was healthy and fit to rear. She inspected the newborn for congenital deformities and testing its cry to hear whether or not it was robust and hearty. Ultimately, midwives made a determination about the chances for an infant’s survival and likely recommended that a newborn with any severe deformities be exposed.^"

Ms Dunn is herself a single mother with disabled offspring.  She threatened to maim and kill me on her Facebook wall in the following terms on Saturday 25 June 2011 at 12:31:

"If anyone wants to take a screenie, tell Claire that when I get my hands on her it won't be my children that are born disabled, she will be the disabled one and lets see if her husband wants to care for a drain on society or if he would have her put down.  What a cheeky slut.  I will kill the bitch."

The disabled are electorally insignificant, and what I said did not threaten them in any way.

All I said was that I would not wish to bring up a severely disabled baby, and would not wish to pass the cost of the care of such a child to the taxpayer, so if the midwife would not do it for me, I would have to commit infanticide.  This is because I know it would not have much of a life if I passed it like a parcel to the uncertain kindness of strangers and to carers who do not care, but instead neglect, bully and abuse their charges as was seen at Winterbourne Vew in Panorama recently.  

This however now translates into the defamatory claim that "Claire Khaw wants to kill all disabled people."

I believe some members would rather have a white candidate polling fewer votes than an ethnic member attracting more votes and reminded of members of the Chinese Communist Party who said they would rather have the weeds of communism than the fruits of capitalism. 

Do I regret what I said about what I would do with my own severely disabled baby?  No, because what I said was the truth that most Britons would admit, if they were not drowning in their own cowardice and hypocrisy in the way a heroin addict might be drowning in his own vomit. 
 
Four men have privately admitted that if they were presented with a baby as severely disabled as Riven Vincent's Celyn, they would have it smothered too.  It is quite understandable that they would not wish to keep a child like that out of taxed income.  It is unlikely, however, that Riven Vincent's husband has much taxed income to speak of from the sound of things at http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jun/09/disability-cuts-mumsnet-david-cameron
 

Celyn's father, Mark Williams, makes sure he is home from work every day at the same time she returns from school. Riven has had multiple sclerosis for 13 years, and three years ago began using a wheelchair outside the house, and a stick to get around inside, making her doubly sensitive to changes in government policy that affect disabled people. As a result her husband does more than 50% of the caring for Celyn. A research scientist, he works part-time, fitting his hours around Celyn's school timetable. "He worked full time until she was two or three, and then it just became too hard," Riven says.

By suspending me and preventing me from becoming mayoral candidate and thereby punishing me for what I said, it does rather suggest that they would rather endorse the lifestyle choices of Riven Vincent and Chez Dunn than criticise them, even when it is pretty clear that so many decades of condoning the bad reproductive choices of white British women is the cause of Britain's decline.  That is why the stupid breed with the poor, producing the feeble-minded, morally destitute feeble-bodied populace we now have.  The British are now more accurately described as "dipso, fatso, bingo, Tesco, ASBO and paedo", and that is why the foreigners keep coming to do the jobs that the locals are no longer capable of doing, and that is why they don't want to integrate.  They don't want to integrate because they don't want their daughters becoming single mothers and they don't want their sons to be divorced homeless losers who have lost contact with his children because his ex-wife has decided it doesn't suit her to have him around.   

I really cannot see how encouraging more white women to behave like Riven Vincent and Chez Dunn would improve the quality and future of the white race, but I guess the BNP are not really into advocating unpopular solutions, and prefer to continue blaming foreigners for all their ills. 

It is a great shame really, that a party formed for the purpose of promoting the interests of white people should so unthinkingly support one of their own rather than another who is not of their race, but who has stuck her neck out for them in the face of predictable vilification by the liberal establishment.

Still, if they want to discipline me and expel me for saying what most white people are too afraid to say and prevent me from attending a meeting at which I could be selected as mayoral candidate, then the way ahead is clear for me. 

I can just pack my bags and go home and leave white people to choke on their own vomit of hypocrisy and cowardice, while poor, promiscuous and stupid white people continue to have more illegitimate and disabled children (with the encouragement of the BNP) and wonder why their country is going to the dogs and Muslims. 

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=151 has a poll in which you are invited to decide whether I would attract more votes than a white candidate for the 2012 London mayoral candidate. 

NB:  The question is not whether you want me to become the BNP mayoral candidate because I am your Facebook friend or because you think it would be quite entertaining, but whether you actually believe I would attract significantly more votes than the other candidates. 

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

My criticism of single mums may lead to my not being selected as 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate

It would appear that I may not become the 2012 London mayoral candidate because of ideological reasons (my views on single mums) rather than my ethnicity.  I got the impression from meetings that quite a few people liked the idea of my being candidate. They were certainly not hostile. Some were even warm and encouraging, so I will not have it said that, if I were to be rejected as candidate, that it was because of my ethnicity.

In these matters one wonders if one should have been more circumspect about uttering such heresies as criticising single mums in the land where single mums rule with a fist of iron, but I have no regrets.

It is my considered view that widespread illegitimacy and family breakdown has been very very bad for white people, who are the people most affected by the destructive policies of liberalism and feminism.

Singly-parented children tend not to do well educationally and socially, and this makes them less desirable as employees, which means that the jobs go to foreigners who are on the whole not singly-parented and better employees.

One of the main reasons why Muslims won't integrate is because they don't want their children to become singly-parenting, divorced and don't want their children to give them illegitimate and probably feral grandchildren.

I know how distasteful Muslims find female promiscuity and understand completely why they would wish to prevent their own children from suffering the same fate as the white working classes and turning into welfare-dependent single mothers or NEETs.

It would be betrayal of my principles and even the interests of BNP supporters to keep quiet about this when about half the babies born in Britain are now born out of wedlock.

If the BNP is too afraid of telling the truth because it is afraid of single mums and feminists, then it is just as bad and in thrall to the feminazis as all the other parties.

If I have demonstrated this ugly truth by failing to be selected as mayoral candidate because of my views on single mums, then at least I will have made my point.

I suppose there is is no harm however in asking people who think I am right to make this stand on family values supported by marriage - whether they are BNP supporters or not - to email the Chairman

contact@nickgriffin.eu

It has been suggested that there may not even be a 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate at all, because of funding issues. I do not know how true this is, however, and I am sure the funding will come if my stand on the institutions of marriage and family strikes a chord with British people of all races and faiths.

It is not as if anyone else is saying the things I am saying about feckless never-married single mums who are a burden on the state and causing the quality of the national gene pool to decline, together with our educational standards and our moral standing in the world.  And so I find myself stepping dutifully into the breach, even as I know will get shot as the bearer of bad news.  

OFFICIAL: women CANNOT be criticised in the Demented Matriarchy that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland

Simon Murray cannot speak the truth about women in Totalitarian Matriarchy that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland

Glencore chairman Simon Murray criticised for sexism
Glencore’s new chairman has been widely condemned for making “unacceptable” and “deplorable” sexist remarks, raising further corporate governance concerns ahead of the commodity trader’s planned $60bn (£37bn) stock market debut.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/mining/8471301/Glencore-chairman-Simon-Murray-criticised-for-sexism.html


Who would now deny that we live in a Demented Matriarchy?   Only the emasculated effeminate shits like Sir Roger Carr, Lord Davies and Vince "Eeyore" Cable.

It has now got so bad that men need the women to speak up for them.

I have now undertaken this task though my political ambitions - there is a theoretical possibility that I may be chosen as the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate - may soon run into the buffers as I have been told that my pro-AV stance is at odds with the BNP's anti-AV stance, and that my regular denunciations of single motherhood will alienate potential female supporters, which the BNP now wish to attract with their new heart logo amongst other things.

Since I have entered politics to speak out about the things I believe in, I shall certainly not be shutting up about the main reason - feminism - why white people are now in their current degraded and degenerate state. (Feminism encourages paedophilia as well as female promiscuity and single parenthood.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/04/louis-theroux-place-for-paedophiles.html)

I see that all white men who dare to challenge feminism end up apologising profusely or denying what they had in fact said.

I shall not be doing any of that.

In fact, I think I would be the best BNP London mayoral candidate because I am saying things that many BNP men think but dare not say for fear of alienating their women.  So yes, lots of BNP men are just as pussy-whipped as their LibLabCon counterparts.  In fact, because they are more shunned by women than their LibLabCon counterparts, they are probably even more desperate to gain their approval.

I am the only BNP candidate that understands what has happened to the British and feels it her duty to keep saying it until everyone understands the point I am making.  I want good things for white people of all classes because I wish to continue living here, and it would sadden me that this country cannot be saved from feminism because white people are now so infested with all the feminine vices of irrationality, hypocrisy and cowardice that they cannot now save themselves from feminism.  It is for this reason that I feel I must now step into the breach.

I imagine that a male BNP candidate would fear his wife leaving him for saying anti-feminist things, or his girlfriend shunning him and potential female partners also shunning him.  The thought of never having sex with a woman ever again would force him into submitting to the shrieks of the demented matriarchy that has turned white working class people into a degenerate race of illegitimate, singly-parenting welfare-dependent scum whom British employers shun and avoid like the plague in favour of foreign labour.

I however am not that bothered if I don't have sex with a woman ever again.  Indeed, it is possible that my saying what I say will excite much interest in men and women wishing to have sex with me.  For all I know, they will be throwing themselves at my feet when I am Mayor of London .... or even if I am not.

But if I never have sex with a man or a woman again that is a noble sacrifice I am prepared to make for the benefit of sex-addicted white people whom I wish to save from themselves.

The greater prize of becoming Mayor of London which I may have to sacrifice because of my anti-feminist stance I suppose I must also come to terms with.

The BNP selection panel should also know that no UKIP mayoral candidate will be saying anything against feminism (though I believe they have plans to say they want to legalise brothel-keeping).

The BNP selection panel should also know that no London mayoral candidate who does not have the Muslim bloc vote ever gets elected mayor and that is why our Red Ken so skillfully cultivated them.

The BNP selection panel should know that I would probably the only BNP London mayoral candidate that would attract any significant Muslim votes, because I have taken the trouble to understand their religion and their concerns and have visited their mosques and spoken to their scholars both radical and moderate.

Muslims will already know that I am the BNP peacenik opposed the invasions of Muslim lands, who deplores the war in "Afraqbya" and have been regular denouncing Liberal Western aggression for many years now in my blogs.

Muslims will know how often I have told them that they are fools for supporting the very parties that make war on Muslim nations while being in needless fear and hatred of a party that - though unashamed about their dislike of Muslims - has quite categorically stated that they would never have  invaded "Afrabya" because it is not in the British National Interest to say they wish to save Muslims from each other by bombing and invading their countries, unquestioningly supporting Israel, and then complaining about Muslim terrorism.

Even if I do not attract enough Muslim voters to make me Mayor of London, I believe I have a pretty good chance of doing better than the previous BNP London mayoral candidates and of showing that Muslims and the BNP have quite a number of things in common chief of which is promoting family values supported by marriage.

http://order-order.com/2009/09/29/exclusive-browns-gulags-for-slags-policy-taken-from-bnp/

So there.