If you have not given up on politics, join a mainstream party even if you are a nationalist

It doesn't matter which of the LibLabCon you join, join, observe and bide your time.

Oh, and read their constitutions like a lawyer, discuss it amongst yourselves and report to me.

Did you know that if we all said what we really think using our own name the sky would fall in on the liberal establishment?

Just join them and say what you really think.  If they expel you for your views, report to me.  Obviously, don't say anything that cannot be morally or intellectually defended or anything that I cannot morally and intellectually defend.

This is what I propose for any nationalist who wishes not to give up on politics but cannot bring themselves to join a pariah party or work for Nick Griffin or Nigel Farage.

If the Conservative Party cancel your membership without giving a reason, let me know.

The Labour Party can suspend you after a thorough investigation, but they suspended the requirement for a thorough investigation for Lutfur Rahman when he was showing signs of having a mind of his own.  Fortunately for him he got his act together in time to run as an independent and is now Mayor of Tower Hamlets.  I have met Lutfur and I really do not believe he is Muslim extremist the way the Islamohobes like Andrew Gilligan are portraying him.  He was wearing jeans on the Sunday I met him and was even photographed wearing a pink shirt.

I have met the Muslims - even the radical ones - and they are not really that scary, in my opinion.

I don't really know that much about the LibDems because they fall below my radar really, but they are supposed to have the most democratic constitution of all.

Just join whichever party with the people you feel most comfortable with, and try to enjoy yourself.

This is the strategy is I suggest for the educated and socially confident.

Remember the real lunatics and extremists are already in power starting wars and forcing gay marriage up our collective anal passages.  Don't let them get away with it.


HELP ME ANNOY THE FEMALE-DOMINATED PC BBC

Would you like to nominate Claire Khaw for the iPM New Year Honour for being the most entertainingly philosophical, political and theological Woman of the Year?  Go on, go on, go on!

I already know they won't let me win but your nominations will annoy them enormously.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0089nbb/features/new-year-honour

Koran Book Club

If I had loadsa money I would have a Claire Khaw Koran Essay Prize as substantial as the Woolfson Prize (£250,000 - http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2011/10/wolfson-prize).

The prize would go to an Islamophobe (and s/he must be a practising Islamophobe and recognised as such by Islamophobes - eg Douglas Murray, Andrew Gilligan) who writes convincingly and truthfully about what they like about the Koran and how it could be a force for good if its guidance were adopted by their government.

Koran Book Club
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=310958681842

Truth about rape offends FemiNazis AKA The Feminist Agenda

If rape is a about violating a woman, then arguably violating a prostitute or a promiscuous woman is not as bad as violating a virgin. We all know how promiscuous the modern British woman is these days. Even Jack Straw pointed out that white women these days are regarded as easy meat by Pakistani-origin British men. Andrew Gilligan asked if they were but dared not answer the question in his piece.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/02/easy-meat-white-girls.html

So what is this manufactured outrage seething and boiling in our age of Slutwalk London 11 June 2011 at 1pm at Trafalgar Square?

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2011/05/slutwalk-london-uk-on-saturday-11-june.html

I think it is part of the living a demented matriarchy. Whatever you think of Dominique Straus Kahn, he should be given a swift trial but for some reason these things take months. Surely the simplest thing is to have a trial ASAP, get all the evidence and jury in? But no, he has to be presumed guilty because it was a crime against women ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/19/dominique-strauss-kahn-resigns-imf

A Facebook friend comments:

Feminists want women to be victims. The higher the number of victims, the more they can push the feminist agenda. So they lobby to create laws and rules which tilt the favor towards the victimization of women. Then after changing laws that help to artificially inflate statistics for the purpose of passing tougher laws and lower evidentiary standards to further inflate statistics in the favor of victimization. They tell women not to protect themselves. The "law" will handle it. They are not looking to prevent rape, just prosecute it. 

The intention to subjugate men and make them mind their Ps and Qs and be properly afraid of them, and make Western men the sad emasculated limp-dicked effeminate cowards they now are.

He adds:

It is also subjugating women to the role of victim. So they are not true feminists but power mongers using feminism as a guise to subjugate everyone.

Usually they select the survivors of the most brutal attacks to help push the agenda. The ones most hurt by the crime do not realize that in most cases, the changes they are making in the laws help put innocent people behind bars. It has altered in a negative way the way men and women interact.

So now you know why men and women distrust and dislike each other so much that they cannot bring themselves to marry each other or have legitimate children or stay married when they do have children.   This of course has implications for the future of the country because it concerns the quality of the next generation, which has of course been destroyed by feminism.  

Are white girls easy meat, asks Andrew Gilligan, but is too frightened to answer.

Googled "white sluts" to gather the majority view of what this means.  Strangely and sadly, the link that came top was about them liking big black cock.

The subtext would appear to be that white women are sex mad and cock crazy.

This is apropos of earlier posts discussing whether white girls are in fact easy meat as Pakistani-Britons are said to think they are, and what, if anything, should be done about it. 

Andrew Gilligan asks the question but does not quite dare answer it.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8248347/Are-white-girls-really-easy-meat.html

It is of course the elephant in the room.

Lutfur Rahman and the BNP bloc vote

http://trialbyjeory.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/an-nec-members-account/

http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=6812

http://www.lutfurformayor.com/about

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/davehillblog/2010/sep/21/lutfur-rahman-removed-as-labour-tower-hamlets-mayoral-candidate

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/davehillblog/2010/sep/22/lutfur-rahman-tower-hamlets-mayoral-campaign-marred-ineptitude-nastiness



http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/davehillblog/2010/oct/11/tower-hamlets-independent-mayoral-candidate-lutfur-rahman-interviewed

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100056657/lutfur-rahman-eleven-are-expelled-from-the-labour-party/

Labour Making a Big Mistake Over Lutfur Rahman
http://www.socialistunity.com/?p=6754

The Labour Party really hate Lutfur Rahman, don't they?  Here are a few anti-Rahman quotes:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/davehillblog/2010/oct/05/tower-hamlets-mayoral-election-campaign-london-citizens-labour-candidate-helal-abbas

Rushanara Ali, the newly-elected MP for Bethnal Green and Bow congratulated the membership for "not tolerating intolerance" whether from "the far right or the far left - the Respect Party. You said goodbye to George Galloway [in May]. You said, we don't want division here, we don't want this community turned against each other - black against white against Asian; men against women; father against daughter; son against mother. That's what George Galloway's legacy has been." But she added: "Unfortunately, the Respect Party is not dead yet. It's rearing its ugly head again in a new way. It's calling itself 'independent'." This got a loud cheer. "It's not the same as Ken Livingstone becoming an independent," she continued. "Don't flatter them." She urged her audience to impress upon voters that the choice of who took care of a billion pound budget was between Labour, "a mainstream political party" that wants to unite the borough's different communities, and a divisive group of people who, among other things, want to "hijack Islam for selfish motives." She warned against intimidation and provocation and paid tribute to older Labour politicians who'd fought against the far right in her youth.

But then one hates and fears the person one has wronged.  Lutfur Rahman was to have been the Labour Tower Hamlets mayoral candidate until a rival Labour mayoral candidate, Helal Abbas, complained about him, causing Lutfur to be removed as a candidate without an investigation. 

This has provoked him into standing as an Independent against the Labour Party which will doubtless result in his expulsion.  Suzanne Moore, the Guardian and Mail columnist who was also a member of the Labour Party, was expelled from the party after she stood against Diane Abbott.

So this is party democracy in Labour, which is not much better than the kind of party "democracy" we get in the BNP. 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/davehillblog/2010/oct/01/tower-hamlets-mayoral-candidate-lutfur-rahman-antisemitism-respect-party


Lutfur Rahman does have a way with words, necessary to a politician and a lawyer of course, but also courage and determination from the array of his enemies:

"It has become fashionable among the right-wing to characterise Tower Hamlets as a 3rd World entity. If by that they mean a place where the rule of law is subordinate to the whims of unaccountable officials; where such basic principles such as "innocent until proven guilty" and the integrity of the democratic process are overruled by fiat, then they are entirely correct. But it is not me, or the borough's Bangladeshi community that are responsible for this sorry state of affairs, it is the Labour Party, who have for years treated Tower Hamlets like the last outpost of the British Raj."

Jeffrey Marshall and I have met Lutfur.  It was two or three years ago at a Safer Neighbourhoods meeting.  It was a Sunday and I remember Lutfur wearing jeans, for some reason.  Jeffrey complained about the intimidating gangs of youths hanging around street corners.  Lutfur even came over and chatted to us because we, being non-Asian, stuck out all like sore thumbs.

A few months later the gangs of intimidating youth had been dispersed with the dispersal notices that Lutfur must have had something to do with.

So, Lutfur's strong on law and order and gets things done.

Another reason why BNP supporters should vote for Lutfur is to show solidarity with someone who has been badly-treated by his party.

Details of how and why can be gleaned by reading http://trialbyjeory.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/an-nec-members-account/

Some of you may have heard of the BNP's recent troubles.  The reason why the BNP have failed to enter a candidate for the Tower Hamlets mayoral elections was because it had escaped the notice of the Acting London Organiser (one Nick Griffin living in mid-Wales who relieved the previous London Organiser Chris Roberts of his post because he was suspected of being a supporter of Eddy Butler the leadership challenger that never was because he could never in a month of  Sunday secure enough nominations under the current rules) that there was a deadline to be met if one wanted to be a candidate for the mayoral elections on 21 October. 

There is just a hint that Lutfur is anti-feminist and anti-Zionist, which would be OK with the typical BNP supporter, I imagine.  (He has clearly outraged Rushanara Ali who  made unspecified allegations against him  to Harriet Harman, the Supreme Matriarch of Britain.  It could be that he suggested that Rushanara Ali - another female candidate of the Oona King mode - is but a creature of the Labour Party and can no longer be said to properly represent the Bangladeshi community.  Perhaps the Bangladeshi community prefer a middle aged lawyer in preference to a slip of a girl who has "gone native" and will probably slavishly support whatever line her party wants her to take.)

Lutfur was also against the invasion of "Afraq" which is another important BNP policy.

Also, Ken Livingstone (whose political antennae is as faultless as mine) supports Lutfur and Keith Vaz - a lawyer - is on record saying that Lutfur's sacking was against the rules of natural justice.

Lutfur won by a majority of almost 200 votes from a total of 881 casted votes and the Local and Regional parties and both expressed confidence that the election had been fair and democratic.

Lutfur Rahman - 433 votes

John Biggs - 251 votes

Helal Abbas - 157 votes

Shome mishtake, shurely?

http://www.labourbriefing.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=80:breaking-news-press-release-21st-september-2010&catid=3:newsflash

It would be an excellent story of mature co-operation if the BNP bloc vote helps to keep the Labour candidate out.  Helal Abbas has been a bankrupt under his other name of Abbas Uddin.  Helal Abbas was also a member of Hope Not Hate - an organisation specifically set up to thwart the BNP.

http://londonmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/10/lutfur-rahman-is-democrat-while-helal.html

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/andrewgilligan/100057592/lutfur-rahman-the-racists-choice/
and

http://hurryupharry.org/2010/10/07/lutfur-rahman-and-his-racist-supporters/ suggests that there is a very nasty and concerted campaign by Andrew Gilligan, Labour and Zionists to smear Lutfur as a racist and an anti-Semite.  I think people of all races who are branded as "racists" by the liberal establishment should stick up for each other. 

The way ahead is therefore clear.  BNP supporters in Tower Hamlets should vote Lutfur Rahman on the grounds of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".  It will be very satisfying to deliver a good hard kick to Labour while proclaiming to the nation that the BNP bloc vote is something to be courted if your majority is anything less than solid.