Why I am supporting the Bill Etheridge and not Simon Darby in the Police & Crime Commissioner Elections by David Jones

By David Jones, Independent Pennine Nationalist

Todmorden, East Lancashire.

Whilst I am sympathetic in general to UK Independence Party, I have always rooted for the British National Party in elections but the decline of the BNP and their failure to capitalise on the law and order issues and field a list of candidates anywhere bar the West Midlands was indeed a great let down. Had I lived in the West Midlands Simon Darby would have probably got my vote but they have a better candidate—the UKIP Candidate Mr Etheridge.

You heard me right, the UKIP candidate is better than the BNP Candidate.

Both candidates are “civic nationalists” but Bill is a man after my own heart, and while I’m sure he wouldn’t endorse everything I believe in, he is a hard working, skilled political operator who genuinely cares about his community and is, generally, a nice guy. The BNP Campaign, however, seems to be a shameless promotion of the BNP by a typical Nick Griffin attack-dog.

The difference between UKIP and the BNP is as follows.

UKIP: - Civic Nationalists, neo-conservatives & Whigs.
BNP: - Civic Nationalists, Socialists & Ethno-Nationalists.

The voting public is not interested in the ideological differences between these two parties in the slightest, only in who will fight for:

A referendum over Britain’s EU membership.
Lower Taxes & Fewer Laws
An end to Party Whips.
An end to mass Immigration.
The abolition of equality, human rights & race laws.
The return of Capital Punishment.
An end to Gay Privilege and the undermining of marriage.

It has come to something when a nationalist like me can no longer support the BNP, but voters want candidates who will represent them competently, not slick, self-promoting party bosses followed by deluded, stubborn buffoons who believe their party is always right.

TV’s Apprentice contestant Katie Hopkins who proposes to fight all 73 EU seats UK “We Demand A Referendum Party” is on the right track, but single-issue doesn’t go far enough. We need an all-nationalist manifesto, not a single issue party.

I myself am running for a Town Council by-election on an independent ticket on pretty much all of these issues, and I think the results will be an education if I win, it will make it much harder for anybody, whether they are in UKIP, the BNP, Ms. Hopkins Campaign to ignore the power of such a message.

First, David Jones (Independent) to Todmorden Town Council.
Secondly Bill Etheridge (UKIP) for West Midlands Police Commissioner.

And Then Ms Hopkins, let's see where we can go from there.

Feminine conspiracy to keep Claire Khaw away from UKIP conference in Birmingham

Maggie Chapman of UKIP does not want to repeal the Equality Act.  Her daughter who gave her four illegitimate grandchildren is a rabid feminist who who does not believe in marriage and is apparently encouraged and paid by our liberal feminist matriarchal state to tell other women it is OK to be single working mothers with illegitimate offspring.

Maggie has been calling me a slut for admitting that I have not always been perfectly chaste in the Land of Compulsory Fornication that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland.

I have told her again and again that you disrespect marriage more when you say it is OK to have illegitimate offspring and grandchildren than for "merely" having an affair with a married man.   I only mentioned the married man with whom I had a long-standing affair because it is a writer that the more mature UKIP supporter might have heard about.  I did not however any illegitimate offspring by him.   His book is out in paperback now, and is available at http://www.amazon.co.uk/Kiss-Me-Chudleigh-William-Cook/dp/1444711504/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1345975545&sr=1-1

As far as I am concerned, the difference between being a slut and an SSM (Slut Single Mum with illegitimate offspring) is the difference between a suspected criminal and a convicted criminal.

The difference between what I have done and what her daughter has done is the difference between getting a speeding ticket and causing death by dangerous driving, I would venture to say.

Any daughter or son of mine who presented me with illegitimate grandchildren would be swiftly and unhesitatingly disowned and disinherited.

Maggie's attitude is the typical one of fudge and mudge.  The fact is that most British non-Asian and non-Muslim mothers are like her  - morally compromised by their low standards of sexual morality.  Therefore, on the one hand they say they support marriage, on the other hand they say it is only a piece of paper and hiss and rage at anyone daring to criticise their atheist feminist SSM daughters who wish to desecrate the institution of marriage to show their arrogant contempt for religion, marriage and men.

Maggie has no concept of social responsibility nor does she take on board that she is allowing her daughter to set a bad example.  It is irrelevant that her four illegitimate grandchildren have parents in a stable relationship.  The fact is that Maggie's daughter and the father of her children have set a bad example.  They encourage other women to think things will work out as well for them if they get themselves knocked up by men who are not their husbands, but most women will find themselves left in the lurch left to bring up their bastards badly in deprived circumstances.  They will not be as fortunate as Maggie's daughter who disdains to marry the father of her children.   However, Maggie does not care about any of this as long as she does not find herself in the position of having to criticise her daughter.

This is what Maggie and so many other British women condone.  Effeminate and emasculated British men, however, are too frightened to say boo to these feminist harridans who cause widespread illegitimacy and degeneracy.

I do not actually know the views of Star, Bill Etheridge's wife about the Equality Act, but I suspect she does not approve of my recommendation that UKIP repeal it.  Indeed, I suspect that most of the objections to this proposal will come from women rather than men, apart from a few rare honourable exceptions.

I know from Bill's Facebook walls that he would like the repeal of the Equality and Human Rights Acts.   Will Star henpeck him into submission though, if her views are different?

It is high time libertarian men noticed who are the naysayers whenever they want to do something that rolls back the petticoats of the nanny state: their own women.

Star Etheridge
‏@star_pumpkin
@raymondfinch hi honey hope all is good for you. Claire Khaw (mentalist of her parish) says she has UKIP conference tickets she's ex BNP!
6:40 PM - 23 Aug 12

Ray Finch
‏@raymondfinch
@star_pumpkin Hi Star! Will get on to it. Thank you.
7:04 PM - 23 Aug 12

Star Etheridge
‏@star_pumpkin
@raymondfinch no worries ツ x
 7:05 PM - 23 Aug 12

OFFICIAL: gollywog now called "racist doll" in Liberal Totalitarian Britain

http://www.birminghammail.net/news/top-stories/2011/03/22/tory-couple-from-dudley-quit-party-in-row-over-racist-doll-97319-28380416/2/

Tory Party couple suspended for being against PC. Excuse: photographed with a gollywog. OFFICIAL: Tory Party supports Totalitarian Censorship

Conservative Party find this photo offensive, apparently.

BY POST AND EMAIL to Bill and Star Etheridge of Sedgeley

18th March 2011

Following a decision of the Disciplinary Committee of the Conservative Party, I am writing to advise you that your membership of the Party has been suspended for a period of 30 days from today’s date.

The Committee received a complaint relating to images which appeared on a Facebook website in which you were photographed with a toy “golly” in support of a campaign against political correctness.

The Committee is satisfied that the complaint raises serious issues that might bring the Party into disrepute and/or that you may be guilty of conduct not compatible with membership of the Conservative Party.

You have the right to apply in writing to the Committee for this suspension to be lifted. The Committee may allow you to make oral representations on the matter. The Committee may then lift or confirm the suspension, or vary the terms on which the suspension takes effect.

Yours sincerely

STEPHEN PHILLIPS

Secretary to the Disciplinary Committee




Do we need yet more evidence that Cameron and his Cunts of Convictionless Cuntservatism are just a continuation of New Labour?

As long as you know that a Commie warmongering Pinko Cunt now leads the Tory Party, everything should start making sense now.