Translate

Showing posts with label MCSFs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MCSFs. Show all posts

Friday, 11 September 2015

Women and Civilisation

Male politicians in Europe are now so emasculated they cannot now deal with national affairs without being in fear of being thought a nasty brute by stupid sentimental infantile female voters who don’t give a damn about the future of their civilisation.

Because very few women contribute to civilisation, they are not interested in anything that is not about them. This is why they applaud when invaders arrive in their cities as they did in Munich and collectively conspire to undermine the rules of traditional marriage with feminism, which they know is the oxygen of the patriarchy.

Treacherous women with bastard offspring, sluts and socialists say such things as “All children are legitimate, even if they are bastards.” By denying bastardy they of course deny marriage. They will only be happy when all children are bastards, all women sluts so that their bastard offspring will be adjudged the same in status as everyone else’s.

Islam at least acknowledges that extramarital sex deserves and requires corporal punishment in order to prevent a situation in which most of your women are sluts, most of your children bastards and most of your men MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) incapable of standing up for any principle, certainly not the one of speaking the truth as they see and understand it, much less defending European cities against invasion by migrant swarms.


BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms

Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Claire Khaw, ethnographer of the BNP, has diagnosed the cause of British malaise: bastardy

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qy05/features/ethnography

The Thinking Allowed Award for Ethnography

Thinking Allowed in association with the British Sociological Association announces a new annual award for a study that has made a significant contribution to ethnography: the in-depth analysis of the everyday life of a culture or sub-culture.
**Entries are now closed for this award, the winning entry will be announced in April 2014**
Are you involved in social science research and completing or will have completed an ethnography this year? The Award is open to any UK resident currently employed as a teacher or researcher or studying as a postgraduate in a UK institution of higher education.
An entry should be a completed ethnography, a qualitative research project which provides a detailed description of the practices of a group or culture. Any sole authored book or peer reviewed research article published during the calendar year of the award will be eligible.
The judges for the Award are Professor Dick Hobbs, Professor Henrietta Moore, Dr Louise Westmarland, Professor Bev Skeggs. The Chair is Professor Laurie Taylor. (Please do not contact any judges directly).
The judges will be looking for work which displays flairoriginality and clarity, alongside sound methodology. The work should make a significant contribution to knowledge and understanding in the relevant area of research.
The panel of judges will select six finalists, and from that shortlist the judges will select an overall winner who will be awarded a prize of £1000.
The winner of the Award will be announced at the BSA Annual Conference in April 2014.


Damn it, I wish I had known about it before.  BNP supporters and the British would have been my subject.

Why are they the way they are?  Cos they are poor and plebeian and everyone expects the poor and plebeian to suffer.  People might care for them if they were fit for purpose.  Being working class they should be fit for the purpose of work but they are not.  They cannot compete with the immigrant worker even in the field of unskilled manual work.

The BNP consist mostly of beta males and because no one finds them sexy or marriageable, nobody cares what happens to them including their women who prefer to marry Muslims and other races just to get a better quality male partner.  Their women - who are mostly SSMs - another sub-species I have been studying at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts - control them.  Beta males under the thumb of omega females do not engender respect, merely disgust and revulsion by members of more patriarchal societies.

They only go on about Muslim grooming but never question why there are so many white girls who are the ready victims of Muslim sex predators. This is because they would have to question the morals of their mothers who are SSMs and SSMs are the only kind of women they have any dealings with.  If they offended SSMs they would get no nookie, which is why they stay quiet.

But if they did start blaming the morals of their women then something might happen in the way of a political discussion, but these moral retards would rather have regular sex than risk saying anything that might threaten their supply of slut sex.

These men are called MCSFs - short for Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers.

Most British men are MCSFs, most British women are sluts, most British mothers are SSMs, and most British children are bastards.

No BNP supporter will explicitly support marriage because they are all sexually compromised MCSFs.

They will not discuss what it means to respect marriage because they know they will have to end up agreeing with me that to properly respect marriage one must logically prohibit extramarital sex, and this would mean that their supply of cheap slut sex would be threatened.  Since they are all atheists and do not believe in an afterlife of 72 virgins, they feel they must take their pleasures where they find them.

Because these men either have no offspring or have lost touch with them they do not particularly care what happens to their offspring after they die.

What the BNP is the rest of Britain will become: a demented matriarchy.

Robert Mugabe said.


"There appears to be a kind of overall dementia affecting the minds of the West.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/how-i-brokered-a-peace-deal-with-robert-mugabe-roy-agyemang-reveals-the-delicate-diplomacy-needed-to-get-zimbabwes-president-to-sit-down-with-the-bbc-9268511.html

This is because most British mothers are SSMs.  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517 The whites have become black

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/the-sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html  Sluts make the next generation stupid.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html  British parents bad parents

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2007/11/12/uk-britain-motto-idUKL1256515520071112
Today's Britain: dipso, fatso, bingo, asbo, Tesco and not forgetting PAEDO ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/leaguetables/10488555/OECD-education-report-subject-results-in-full.html
British getting stupider and stupider

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html
British people with a learning disability are increasing in number by 5% a year.
In what year will Britain be 100% learning disabled?

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.  

Thursday, 2 January 2014

An electoral strategy to defeat the matriarchy and bring back the patriarchy

In my opinion, my ethological analysis of the degradation of the Western male, who are all omega males because they are afraid of offending their omega females, is a useful and sticky idea. It adequately explains why foreign men come to the West to exploit the West's welfare benefits and its easy women under the very noses of angry white men who remain impotent and afraid of pointing to the cause of their degeneracy: the promiscuous woman whom they love to fuck. Cheap slut sex is the opium of the men in a matriarchy. This is further explained at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/not-only-are-most-men-beta-males-most.html

Women basically have two kinds of allies in men:

(1) Married and marriageable men who want to keep the price of sex high and who want to respect marriage and who care about the long term national interest. These men would tend to be the ones who have already done the right thing, ie got married, stay married and have legitimate offspring.

(2) MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) These are men mostly unmariageable and understandably want to keep the price of sex low and who want to protect the slut because the slut is their only source of sex, after which they only have the option of prostitutes, adultery, sodomy, incest, paedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia and masturbation as a last resort.

It would actually be quite easy to discredit and dismiss the views of men in the second category.

Why should we allow Western civilisation to be destroyed by the moral corruption of sluts, SSMs and MCSFs, ie those who indulge in extramarital sex and who have no intention of adding to the social and demographic capital of the nation either because they do not wish to, or will never be given the opportunity to do so because they are poor specimens of masculinity and also financially incapable of attracting and retaining the interest of a rational and moral woman?

As for the female voters that leaders of political parties are so afraid to alienate, they are easy to divide and rule.  Basically, all the political establishment has to do is divide female voters into mothers and non-mothers and ask the mothers if they would rather have the option of being housewives and mothers instead of being forced to work.  Most women only work because they have to, and would be quite happy to give up work.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1219131/What-women-REALLY-want-Forget-working-Superwoman-ideal-mothers-value-time-home-children-Cristina-Odone.html

As for the non-mothers, who have not so far contributed to the rearing of the next generation, their selfish and self-serving views can easily be ignored and dismissed too.

Monday, 28 October 2013

The fact that no political party in Britain will have me is conclusive proof that it is a matriarchy

Below is an exchange on the subject of why no party would have me.  

Anonymous  Claire, there is no party would have you.

Claire Khaw  Because ...  ?

Anonymous  Claire, start your own party because no other party will have you, that is just a fact, like it or not.

Claire Khaw  Just give me a reason.  There must be so many, eh?

Anonymous  Why don't you ask them why they won't let you in?

Claire Khaw  I have tried to ask Kevin Scott [Chairman of the British Democratic Party].  First he says it is cos he didn't like my speech at the Newcastle meeting, and then it was my stance on feminism.  I just want an official reason.

It is very interesting the way they won't give me a proper reason.

I suppose they don't quite dare say to me "It is cos you are a tiddly wink, innit."

Or, they could say "It is cos you have blasphemed against feminism."

Or, they could say "It is cos you have insulted our women and we are afraid of associating with you cos our women will become angry with us and not have sex with us if we are seen to in any way endorse your views about our women."

Which do you think it is?

It wouldn't reflect very well on them if they were to tell me the real reason why, so that is why they are staying silent thinking I will just shut up and go away if they ignore me for long enough. They should know better though.


"We know who is in power by those we cannot criticise."

And we cannot criticise sluts, can we?

That the Traditional Britain Group also refuse to tell me why I am also persona non grata neatly demonstrates that posh or plebeian, all British men are afraid of British sluts, because they have the vote. To be fair to TBG, they are not a political party and are just a dining club, but they are probably to a man MCSFs.  http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

Because men who are afraid of omega females instantly become omega males, it is not surprising that they are treated with contempt by the rest of the world.  The rest of the world thinks most white men are paedophiles, by the way.  Yet these white men who feel no shame continue to bury their heads deeper in the sand, for they have become women.  Denial is a feminine vice, after all.  

Questions to ponder on morality


  1. What is the space that is in between morality and law?  (The gap that lies between morality and law is the gap that lies between being a slut and an SSM. Being a slut is immoral, but not illegal, and I propose no punishment until the slut becomes an SSM attracting the punishment of 100 lashes.  The difference between a slut and an SSM is therefore the difference between a suspected criminal and a convicted criminal.)
  2. Can morality exist without law?
  3. Can law exist without morality?
  4. Is what is necessary always moral?
  5. What is the purpose of morality?
  6. Is the purpose of morality the long-term survival and health of your society?  
  7. Is there such a thing as liberal morality?
  8. Is liberal morality a contradiction in terms?
  9. Is it the totalitarian Equality Act 2010 that enforces liberal morality?
  10. If the purpose of morality is to engender social cohesion, how successful do you think liberal morality has been at this?  
  11. Is the sum of liberal morality healthy eating, sexual liberation, to not be homophobic, to not be racist, to not be sexist, to nurture the weak and stupid until their numbers overwhelm the strong and rational at general elections?
  12. Is liberal morality effeminate?
  13. Is the Equality Act 2010 and no-fault divorce the twin pillars of the matriarchy?  
  14. Is the patriarchy the lesser evil?
  15. If we are morally rational people should we not choose the lesser evil?  
  16. Does sexual morality influence general standards of morality?
  17. If most of the mothers in your country are SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379,  most of your women sluts (ie fornicatresses), most of your children bastards and most of your men MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html,  do you think another group who does not suffer from these moral cancers easily defeat you in any human endeavour?  
  18. What are we to think of feminists who refuse to discuss sexual morality?
  19. Is feminism a moral ideology?  
  20. What are we to think of feminists who wish to deny the concept of slut?
  21. Is it not Orwellian the way feminists want to deny the concept of slut?  
  22. Why do you think feminists wish to deny the concept of slut?
  23. Do feminists wish to deny the concept of slut because most Western women are in fact sluts, ie fornicatresses?
  24. If most women in a society are fornicatresses, does it make most men fornicators?
  25. If most children are singly-parented, are these children likely to take on the vices of their single-parent who in the overwhelming number of cases would be their mother?
  26. Is the reason why most British men are now effeminate because they were brought up by their single mothers?
  27. Is men saying it is OK for their women to be sluts ie fornicatresses the equivalent of men handing over masculine and parental authority to women, with predictable results of decline and degeneracy?  
  28. Is the reason why British men refuse to discuss the low morals of their women because they know that if they acknowledged this, they would have to do something about it? 
  29. Is the reason why British nationalists (whom you would expect to care about the quality of their race) refuse to discuss sexual morality because they are the group and class of people most afflicted by this societal cancer and most frightened of losing sexual access to their women, who are overwhelmingly fornicatresses and SSMs?  
  30. Are women now so powerful that men now want to become women and are prepared to mutilate their genitals to do so?  http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/16593126

Saturday, 26 October 2013

The Khavian Theory of Sex for a Gender-Balanced Nation

Why oh why oh why do these nationalists hate and fear me so?

This is so unfair when all I have been trying to do is investigate and discover the case of Western malaise and help white men find their lost mojo.  

As Mao said, "To investigate a problem is to solve it."  I did investigate and made a diagnosis.  It was a diagnosis that is unpalatable, requiring as it does to slay the sacred cows that Westerners worship. Not only is it unpalatable, it is also irrefutable, and so even my detractors have given up saying "No, you're wrong, Claire, it just ain't so."

They cannot deny the correctness of my diagnosis because the things they sometimes say, especially when they complain about Cultural Marxism (when they really mean feminism) suggests that they too understand the problem a little.

But they only mention it en passant when they talk about fatherlessenss, bad parenting, single mothers and the secret family courts.

Fathers4Justice are absolutely terrified of complaining about feminism and it is also actually run by a woman.

The men at the BDP,  TBG and the London IONA Forum surely know what I mean, but they are making a point of not telling me why I am excluded from their meetings.

Is it my race? Could it even be that they find some of my ideas objectionable?  But which ones, I have so many?

I cannot be sure, but I suspect it is my uncompromising view that slut-shaming would cure the West of its malaise and blow its cobwebs away.

They cannot deny that lashing SSMs 100 times per illegitimate offspring would probably be the only thing that would stop these immoral and irresponsible women from bringing into existence the next generation of illegitimate disabled, retarded, obese and behaviourally-challenged NEETs.

Even abolishing the welfare state would not do the job quickly enough, because there are bound to be more than a few who will still get knocked up however much you warn them not to.

Therefore inflicting corporal punishment in a  public place is the only way of serving as a regular and effective reminder for women not to be sluts, especially sluts who go on to become SSMs.

I suppose these men don't want to acknowledge this brutal fact, and want to carry on complaining about the corrupt oligarchy that comprises our government as well as Jews, Muslims, Zionists, Islamists rather than do something that might actually work NOW.

The British are after all addicted to welfare, cheap labour, cheap sex courtesy of feminsim and it is undeniable that all my proposals threaten the sacred cows of the liberals and breach their taboos.

You would have thought that these men who fear for their nation, their race and their descendants would be interested in discussing things in a bit more detail, or invite me to give a talk so they can challenge me about my views, if only to reassure themselves that things are not as bad as I say they are, but not a bit of it.

I cannot prove it immediately, but I suspect that all these nationalist men have


  1. girlfriends who are fornicatresses
  2. wives who have friends who are fornicatresses
  3. daughters who are fornicatresses
  4. grand-daughters who are fornicatresses
  5. daughters whose  friends are fornicatresses
  6. male friends whose girlfriends are fornicatresses
  7. sons whose girlfriends are fornicatresses
  8. girlfriends who are SSMs
  9. daughters who are SSMs
  10. grand-daughters who are SSMs

In short, these men who claim to be so concerned about the quality of the white race are either SPOSSMs http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/sex-partner-of-ssm-spossm.html and/or MCSFs http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html.  

This means that what I am trying to do is the equivalent of trying to take the bottle out of the hands of a drunk, when he is bent on getting drunk.  

The problem is also identified by Markus Willinger of Generation Identity:

"We reject unrestrained sexuality more than any other generation. This is because for no previous generation in history has true love played such a great role as it does for us. Of all the things that you're devalued and destroyed, you've left us love. Truly, you've never really cared about love. You've despised it and sold it short. But precisely for that reason. you've never launched a frontal assault against it. It remained alive. And it became to our last place of refuge. So here we are this world of loneliness and fleeting happiness; we long for the person who can bring us to safety. It is our highest goal and our greatest happiness to find true love. Yet we are sexually promiscuous, drink hard, and settle for the second best. No one suffers more from this than we ourselves. /.../ The consequences of your 'sexual liberation' have us in a stranglehold. It is impossible to go out even even a day into the world without being greeted by half-naked men and women. All films, advertising, and magazines consciously manipulate sexual desire. So it is that desire grows, often in opposition to our love. When it's over and the wild, alcohol-soaked night is behind us, we regret what we've done. Often we feel sad because of it. This inner struggle, which each of us must win for himself, is also part of our identity. Yet we declare resolutely: we want to win it! A long road may lie for us, but in the end, the love within us will triumph over animalistic desire. For we are generation identity." 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1907166416/ref=cm_sw_r_fa_asp_aLvOG.036Y83X

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23-JNgPGdTc

Sex with sluts is the opium of the white man.


Once the current state of affairs (ie the fact that most British mothers are SSMs, most British women are sluts and most British men are MCSFs) is reversed, you can be sure that a new culture and a new tradition will come out of this, like a phoenix from the ashes.

But first we must systematically and absolutely challenge the supremacy of feminism. The future of this or any society depends on whether the men of the West, who are mostly manginas, can control their women.  To control their women they must first take control of themselves.

To get better, you must first acknowledge that you are sick, see the doctor and take your bitter medicine.  If SSMs are making you sick then you must ask yourself where they come from.  SSMs come from sluts, just as butterflies come from caterpillars.

The trouble is that men - especially men who do not have much money and status - want sex to be cheap, and cheap sex can only come from sluts.

Once the government has created a moral environment in which most women are sluts from whom most men get most of their sex, then you will have an entire nation that is addicted to cheap sex.

To expect such men to voluntarily make sex more expensive for themselves is like asking hungry men if they want to pay more for food.

I do not expect the hoi polloi or the great unwashed to support me in this, but I was expecting just a bit of leadership from the great and the good, but the trouble with living in a matriarchy is that the great and the good soon become extinct.

This is because a society that is run by slut values turns all its men into beta males, if not omega males.

You would expect every animal group to be led by an alpha male. In our society the alpha male (in this case the British Prime Minister and all the men who are leaders of political parties in Britain) is afraid of the omega female ie the SSM https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379.  The omega female is the least desirable female.  If you were looking for a wife the SSM would be the least desirable kind of woman for you.  By allowing indiscriminate universal suffrage to operate and allowing SSMs to vote turns all men into omega males - the least desirable kind of male. There is no other class of male that is lower than that of males who are afraid of the worst of his women, is there?   Men who are afraid of women are considered the lowest of the low in courage and principle, because such men would be afraid of human beings who are in fact stupider and weaker than him, and therefore beyond contempt.  

I suppose it is possible that men detest being told that most of the women of their race and nation are immoral and that they are afraid of these immoral women.

But if a patient must have his leg amputated or he will die, then surely the only ethical thing to do is for the doctor to tell him so rather than sell him another bottle of snake oil?

It is clear that the cancer of the matriarchy has spread to all the major organs of state in the West.

“If you want to destroy any nation without war, create adultery or nudity common in the young generation.”
- Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn Ayyub

If these men want anything to be done they must not fear to denounce feminism.  If they are too afraid to do it themselves, then they must get someone to do it for them.

I am a bullet in search of a gun, but I doubt UKIP, BNP or the BDP are brave enough to discuss sexual morality precisely because they fear alienating their female activists and voters.  

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

An extreme act of provocation by Muslims safe in the knowledge that West Ham FC would offer them a prayer room soon?

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/438337/VIDEO-Anger-as-West-Ham-fans-turn-on-own-Muslim-supporters-as-they-pray-under-main-stand

Earlier this year, Newcastle United announced it was installing a prayer room for its Muslim players, while reigning Champions League winners Bayern Munich have decided to build a mosque at their headquarters to make their stars comfortable.

The white indigenous atheist working class male should and understand and know precisely in what degree of contempt his views are held in by the powers that be, and how he has become second class citizen in his own own land.  His own football club will no longer take his side even if he is in the majority and instead favour a minority whom he loathes.  

How has that happened?  Because the Muslims have their religion and God, while the white indigenous have no culture, no family, no respectability and no God.  White indigenous women are well known to be SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379 and the men MCSFs http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html, ignorant of their own degradation and the contempt in which they are held by the political establishment and respectable people all over the world.  As we can see, the establishment instinctively defers to a people with religion even though they are in the minority and dismisses people who complain about them as barbaric and savage because they are without religion, even if they are the overwhelming majority.

Their imam may wish to have a word with them about provoking the locals unnecessarily, or it may be his intention to encourage them to provoke the godless and the degenerate, knowing that Allah will protect them.

The Koran does however tell Muslims not to pray ostentatiously, which they should perhaps heed, for we already know what happens to people who ignore God's laws.

017.110
YUSUFALI: Say: "Call upon Allah, or call upon Rahman: by whatever name ye call upon Him, (it is well): for to Him belong the Most Beautiful Names. Neither speak thy Prayer aloud, nor speak it in a low tone, but seek a middle course between."
PICKTHAL: Say (unto mankind): Cry unto Allah, or cry unto the Beneficent, unto whichsoever ye cry (it is the same). His are the most beautiful names. And thou (Muhammad), be not loud-voiced in thy worship nor yet silent therein, but follow a way between.
SHAKIR: Say: Call upon Allah or call upon, the Beneficent Allah; whichever you call upon, He has the best names; and do not utter your prayer with a very raised voice nor be silent with regard to it, and seek a way between these.

Are there any Muslim fans in Millwall?  They should try the same stunt there and see if they cannot wangle themselves a prayer room while non-Muslim white football fans have their objections dismissed as racist, evil and extremist.  Go on, I dare you.  What you don't ask for you don't get it.  

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...