Translate

Showing posts with label Family Education Trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Family Education Trust. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 December 2014

Beta Males and a Pretty Boy make up the "men's rights movement" too afraid to call themselves antfeminists excited about Pretty Boy's new book telling men not to marry or pay for first date


Stand By Your Manhood by Peter Lloyd
Do buy it and tell me what you think about it.

I haven't read it but already know it is going to be a waste of time.

Esther Vilar's Manipulated Man

Erin Pizzey on 8 December 2014:
Dreadful interview on five live a few minutes.Theresa May is bringing in a new law that will criminalise coercive and controlling behaviour I tried to say that I don't see how this can be possible. If the partner is physically abusive and dangerous they need a safe place to reorganise their lives .but to criminalise bullying as far as I'm concerned is a stretch too far who decides what is bullying and what is not? Apparently the police will have to make that decision.The police are flat-out dealing with endless phone calls from quarrelling couples . This will only add to the senseless burden.there is this monstrous regiment of womenTheresa May Harriet Harman, Yvette Cooper, Patricia Hewitt and Vera Baird who have made their career raging against men. They seem demonising men and fathers as a way to garner votes.

CK: "You should join UKIP, Erin!"

EP: "Don't do politics I trust in God."

 CK: "God helps those who help themselves. If you are going to retire into prayer, perhaps you would like to appoint a successor, Erin? Politics is not really for the prayerful and the senescent, after all.
If you are not up to the job, perhaps you will let someone else do it, with your blessing."

EP: "I don't have a job there is nothing to succeed."

CK: "What do you see as your role in this? And whom would you say is the most effective campaigner against feminism in this country?"

EP: "It isn't a competition Clair I. Think you are being rude and there is no place for rudeness on my Facebook page. All of us are working to a common end. Prayer and the love of God drives my life."

Gerwyn Cox: "She is a troll Erin Pizzey"

CK: I am not interested in competing for the sake of competing, but the situation is worsening while you seem content to marinate in complacency and apparently think nothing more than what you do and your prayers are enough to change things.

What *exactly* are you asking people to do?

Is what you are saying more than just a complaint without offering any solutions?

Then it is not ENOUGH.

Is what Mike Buchanan doing ENOUGH?

Do people not think he is deluded in thinking he and his party with that stupid long name is going to change things?

The only way is to get UKIP to take up this cause but they are not going to because Nigel Farage is a moral coward.

Perhaps you don't really care about changing or doing anything?

I want to actually do something and have a few suggestions.

I am for practical and political action and any movement must begin with a leader.

Is there a leader against feminism in Britain, Erin?

If there is I would like to know who you think he or she is.

What is a troll, Gerwyn? Someone who says things you dislike?"

Stephanie Smith: "Claire Khaw, please at least try to maintain a vague semblance of decorum and stop personally attacking people for not doing what you personally believe should be done. Erin is doing her best, and has been fighting for far longer than you have."

CK: "It is not ENOUGH. How else am I going to bring it to your attention?
Actually, I know none of you really care. You just come here to WHINGE without expecting anyone to do anything, like women wanting a moan and wanting a shoulder to cry on, right?
Is that it then?"

EP: "Clair I am sorry for you -you are a very angry woman after this I am going to block you.we don't behave like this goodbye."

Rob Didcott: "UKIP are not the answer even though they want to be all things to all men and women while not in power."

CK: "UKIP are not the answer even though they want to be all things to all men and women while not in power. "
What is the answer, Rob?
I can tell no one here is interested in solutions, only in whingeing."

Glynis Susan Hunt: "Claire you really are condescending in your manner. You should oh back to the beginning. Erin clearly states she has been in a debate. Something she frequently does to raise the profile of this issue. More to the point why not tell us what you personally are doing to fight your cause."

That is the kind of "constructive" activism you can expect from activists of the *old* school. They know they are going to die soon so they don't give a fuck. Anyway, UKIP would only kick her out and she couldn't bear the indignity of that.

This woman was recently on Womans' Hour. If you are invited on Woman's Hour, then you are one of the girls.

What did EP say on Woman's Hour?

Not much.

Did she even say the word feminism?

NOPE.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04p54yd

Is this fat old woman going to risk saying anything that would make the invitations for her to write the occasional article and appear in the media dry up altogether?

OF COURSE NOT.
But because she has been there forever, she is squatting at the top of the tree pissing and shitting on anyone who thinks she should shape up or ship out and stand aside for someone actually prepared to do something CONSTRUCTIVE.

Fat old women about to die and who have nothing constructive to say except moan and whinge are not going to do much for anyone or anything.

Listen to all the platitudes she and her fans excrete: "we are all working together .. " Crap.

Are they even "working"?

Is posting on Facebook patting each other on the back for their services to mankind with no risk to themselves "working"?

I don't fucking think so.

All anti-feminist movements are made up of fat old dying cunts like her who would hate anyone else to succeed where they have failed.

In many ways it is very BNP and UKIP - elderly people who aren't up to much and don't see why they have to try any harder than they ever tried.

Believe me: if I see anyone who does what I am trying to do better than me I would work with them and help them or stand aside so they can do the job better, but not fat old platitudinous cunts like her, who can't even engage with me on the issues and then deletes and blocks me when it all gets too much for her tired fat old brain.

Antifeminists in Britain:


  1. Fat dying old Erin Pizzey
  2. Angry little beta male Mike Buchanan
  3. Angry (beta male) Harry
  4. Pretty Boy Peter Lloyd
  5. little old  me who is female, foreign but who has alpha male qualities.

There are peripheral groups that are sort of antifeminist like The Marriage Foundation, Family Education Trust and The Conservative [Catholic] Woman, but they do it oh so politely and are consequently suffered to exist but in practice ignored and dismissed.

ISIS are gonna come over and cut all your fucking heads off and make slave girls of your daughters and female descendants.

But hey, I know why you all love and support that fat dying useless old woman: cos she is all you know and you prefer someone you are used to, who is one of you - white, Christian - even though she is fucking USELESS.

She is gonna say her prayers and die and then leave you all to clean up the shit. Not her problem any more, is it, when she pops her clogs?

AN EXAMPLE OF HOW FUCKING USELESS SHE IS

Her next "campaign" is to get  her brain dead retard sycophantic supporters to write to the BBC, woo hoo!

Erin Pizzey on 9 December 2014:

I have just launched a complaint with the BBC on the grounds of bias and inaccurate information. I intend to take this complaint as far as I can. I find it outrageous that the BBC can allow a avowed feminist organisation (women's Aid ) to take part in this programme without providing a balance to demonstrate that both men and women can be equally violent. I think that the BBC and Panorama have discriminated against male victims of domestic violence. 

Please would those of you who agree with me also fill in the BBC complaints on line.


Like the Blibtard Broadcasting Corporation gives a fuck what we think about BBC bias.

Sir Paul Coleridge: how to let a lesbian feminist walk all over you when you are trying to promote marriage and a former High Court Judge

Do you think I can do better?

Why don't you try me and see?

I can only be acknowledged as leader if you acknowledge me as leader.

But if you want to stick to know what you know and be polite then continue to ignore me and listen to the fat old woman who only prays and doesn't do politics, the pretty boys with books to sell and columns to fill for the Guardian and Mail and want to keep their jobs. then keep thinking they are the ones with the answers.

You should know that Fathers4Justice is run by Matt O'Connor's wife and Family Needs Fathers is terrified of losing their funding they will not risk antagonising the feminazis.

Men stitched up LONG AGO by feminazi legislation no political party dares to even talk about

What do you have to do if I am a leader?

Nothing particularly scary - just get UKIP to say they will abolish no fault divorce and repeal the Equality Act 2010 or at least explain why they are too scared to do so: cos they are afraid of alienating the female vote.

When you finally back them into that corner, sweetly suggest that they propose to abolish indiscriminate universal suffrage and promote the principle of no representation without taxation to disenfranchise all the parasitical sluts single mothers and their NEET offspring. I am  not the only who proposes this, for Ian Cowie, a Telegraph journalist, proposes the same thing too at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

I am not going to order you to go over the top, drink Kool Aid or anything like that, just encourage you gently, at first, to do what you already know you should be doing but were too busy "looking after number one" or watching TV, or whatever, to do.

Tycoon driven to suicide by his gold-digger wife. What would you like to do to his ex-wife if you were late tycoon's parents?

Scott Young's death certificate should say DEATH BY GOLD-DIGGER
Tycoon whose death was caused by his gold-digging ex-wife. Not looking too good now, is she?

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 1 May 2014

Why Trojan Horse Muslim parents don't want sex education and co-ed schools

Because it turns their daughters into sluts and their sons into MCSFs.

This is precisely what the Trojan Horse Muslim parents http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10790441/Guide-to-school-Islamisation-by-ringleader-of-Trojan-Horse-plot.html wish to prevent by banning sex education from Birmingham state schools who are majority-Muslim. There are in fact many non-Muslim parents who want to do the same thing who would support such organisations as the Family Education Trust. http://www.famyouth.org.uk/ Being Christian, they can't act their act together to do so, because we know that Christianity and hypocrisy go hand in hand, and cowardice is the main ingredient of hypocrisy.

Perhaps they have reason to fear. A High Court judge was forced to resign because he dared to support marriage. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2526180/Anger-judge-forced-resign-championing-marriage-Sir-Paul-Coleridge.html (We should discover the names of the his colleagues who opposed his views, should we not? Any judge who opposes marriage must be morally suspect, must s/he not?)

Why might Muslims want to segregate the sexes?

Is it because they want their sons to learn masculine values - and more importantly, learn the skills of leadership and character that would help their sons become leaders and alpha males - that are more easily inculcated in an all-male environment?

Leadership skills should be taught in boys' schools, or ought to be.

In a co-ed environment, the perceived alpha male is the one the girls go for. So boys are psyched to learn how to please girls from early adolescence. That is why the morals of this country have turned into the SHIT they have become.

The more I think of it the more I think the Trojan Horse Muslim parents have it right. I rather admire the way to have got it together to try to do what they did.

Lots of non-Muslim parents want to withdraw their sons and daughters from sex ed, because it turns their daughters into sluts and the sons into MCSFs.  (The MCSF is explained at http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html.) Too bad the people at The Family Education Trust, The Marriage Foundation, The Christian Institute, Christian Concern and The Conservative Women don't have the guts to say so, and are secretly glad in their Islamophobic way that the more enterprising Muslim parents have got themselves into trouble again with the liberal establishment.

We live in a matriarchy and all matriarchies are pornocracies.  The pornocracy recruits fresh blood by turning our sons into MCSFs and our daughters into sluts.

Most British women are sluts these days.

Sluts (women who have sex with men not their husbands) tend to become SSMs. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

Most British mothers are SSMs. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

'The whites have become black' says David Starkey. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14513517

By 1996, 70 percent of inmates in state juvenile detention centers serving long-term sentences were raised by single mothers. http://www.rightwingnews.com/uncategorized/ann-coulter-on-single-mothers-the-statistics-from-guilty/

The real root of crime in Jamaica where 85% of mothers are SSMs. http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20070204/focus/focus2.html

The Bhagavad Gita indicates the position we should take on SSMs if we are to save our civilisation.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/the-bhagavad-gita-indicates-position-we.html

Are 83% of female MPs morally corrupt, compared to only 48% of male MPs?
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/if-you-hate-gay-marriage-blame-83-of.html

Cultural Collapse Theory  http://www.rooshv.com/cultural-collapse-theory

Remember: all advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive and declining civilisations are matriarchal.  

A patriarchy condones male promiscuity while a matriarchy condones and rewards female promiscuity.

A properly regulated patriarchy would have an alpha male.

In a matriarchy all males are afraid of criticising sluts. This means all males are lower than the omega female. The omega female would be considered the least desirable female if you are looking for a wife and mother for your children, because she has already given birth to some other man's bastard - the SSM. The deemed alpha male of Britain is its Prime Minister. Is David Cameron afraid of cirticising SSMs, who have the vote? Does any leader of any political party in the UK dare to criticise SSMs, who have the vote?

It is dangerous to allow your society to become a matriarchy because matriarchies are atomised societies - the opposite of being socially cohesive - who are vulnerable to their internal and external enemies.

Who are the internal enemies of any society? Socialists, sluts and their running dogs, I would suggest.

How to solve the problem of matriarchal hegemony http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/too-many-women-have-vote-and-solution.html

Out of two evils, it would be moral and rational to choose the lesser evil, and it is clear that the patriarchy is the lesser evil.

Please help me save Western civilisation from sluts.  All other races and nations who have enjoyed the benefits of Western civilisation should have a care too.

Tolerating illegitimacy is the act of allowing your race to be taken over by an inferior race.  Their agents are the SSM, the cancer of your society.



How chasing the female vote took away our liberty and increased our taxes
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 10 September 2012

Demonstrate outside Birmingham Town Hall on 20-21 September at the UKIP conference if you want to support marriage and challenge feminism

Why do they have nothing in their manifesto about supporting the institution of marriage at http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies

Was it an oversight or a deliberate omission?

Or are they just frightened of the female voter like all the rest of those lily-livered politicians in government?

UKIP should at least offer to the voter the abolition of no fault divorce

If they cannot even do that, they are not fit for purpose.   

You could email UKIP at

mail@ukip.org

and ask them why they do not have any pro-marriage policies, but you probably won't.

You could ring them up at 0800 587 6 587 and ask them why not, but you probably won't.

You could visit http://c4m.org.uk/contact-us/ and ask them if they have lobbied UKIP for pro-marriage policies.

You could visit http://www.marriagefoundation.org.uk/ and ask if they have lobbied UKIP for pro-marriage policies.

You could visit http://www.famyouth.org.uk/contact.php to ask if they have lobbied UKIP for pro-marriage policies.

But will you?

All it take is for those three organisations to collectively put pressure on UKIP to promote pro-marriage policies.

Will they do it?





at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 17 August 2011

Why British men are kneeling before their deity of the slut single mum, fearful of blaspheming against feminism and female promiscuity, propitiating her with a sexual favour in an attempt to take her wrath away ...

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100100485/the-riots-remind-us-that-polygamous-societies-are-naturally-violent/

Ed West's egregiously confused blog post is probably testament to the fact that he is so afraid of the feminazis getting him that he has confused the matriarchy with polygamy in his nervousness.  To be polygamous, one has to take be able to legally take more than one wife, not impregnate more than one woman.  That should ahve been quite obvious to an educated man like him, but, strangely and sadly, Ed West affects not to notice this or really cannot understand the difference himself. Possibly, Telegraph readers these days are now to feminised and dumbed-down themselves to notice any errors of reasoning.

In a matriarchy, it pays women to be promiscuous.  In a matriarchy, extra-marital sex is condoned and even rewarding for the woman.  The man who has sex with a woman to whom he is not marred is deemed to want to pay for any bastard he sires even if it is quite clear that he wished no such thing.  A man who has sex with a woman not his wife who indicates that she is prepared to have no-strings sex with him simply wants to have sex, not make a baby with her and pay for it until it is 16 or until it has finished full-time education.

A woman who has sex with a man thinking he wants to pay for any offspring sired as a result of that union is arguably an imbecile, and imbeciles should be spayed for the greater good so that the national gene pool is not contaminated by imbecility, one would have thought.

But liberals are hardly known for the rationality of their thinking processes these days.  Most of the time  cannot even explain their bizarre behaviour to themselves, much less to their critics and challengers.  Indeed, it is all they can do to repeat their mindless mantra of indiscriminate compassion and endless tolerance of everything that  is harmful to society.

It is therefore no surprise that the women who go forth and multiply and bring forth illegitimate offspring - the bastard spawn of stupid sluts (a pleonasm like tuna fish) - turn out to be depraved, degraded and criminal who enjoy a spot of looting, arson, assault and murder whenever the opportunity allows.

What is surprising is really the effeminate and neurotic cowardice of the educated white middle class British male, who fear to criticise the slut single mum - apart from the noble exception of Kevin Myers based in Belfast at http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/kevin-myers/how-our-race-taboo-makes-us-colourblind-to-the-truth-16035253.html.  This is probably because he fears his female friends and relations who are also single mums and perhaps his male friends and family who were singly-parented.

Strangely and sadly, Norman Wells of the charity Family Education Trust http://www.famyouth.org.uk/ that was set up for the purpose of promoting family values supported by marriage declared to me on 16 August 2011 that his organisation does not exist to "bash single mums".  What on earth is it for then, when so many commentators like Ed West are so deeply fearful of offending the slut single mum who spawns bastards at taxpayers' expense?

It is possible that Ed West fears to denounce them because he has not married the mother of his illegitimate children because he sees no need to do so, rather like Ed Miliband, never found the time and inclination to do so until he became leader of the Labour Party.

Ed West may fear his 'common law wife' or a feminazi superior at the Telegraph, but what excuse has Norman Wells got for not doing his job properly?  What excuse has he got for fearing the slut single mum who is encouraged to breed by successive governments at taxpayers' expense?   There are after all plenty of organisations that say they promote family values supported by marriage, but dare not go the whole hog of condemning feminism and Never Married Single Mothers ("NMSMs").  They skirt around the issues and beat about the bush, talking in their mealy-mouthed way about 'absent fathers'  and such abstract ideas as 'parenting', 'discipline' that are beyond the wit of dumbed-down inhabitants of Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland to grasp unless demonstrated in parenting classes at the further expense of the taxpayer, content that they they have written the requisite number of words even if none of them criticise the slut single mum who breeds bastards at taxpayers' expense.

Perhaps the sheer numbers of sluts and bastards in Britain is alone enough to emasculate and feminise men like Norman Wells and Ed West.  If so, the prognosis is very bleak indeed.  It means that the cancer has spread to all the major organs - the balls and the guts - and has now reached the brain.

The patient is therefore terminal and funerary arrangements ought to be made now, for the stinking rotten body of liberal feminism that will soon be consigned to oblivion and his illegitimate offspring pauperised, disgraced, taken to the orphanage, later to be sexually exploited and enslaved by an uncaring 'carer'.

Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland with its cowardly new race of feral and feminised men, skint, scared and stupid, should therefore prepare themselves for the new New Age in which Tomorrow most certainly does NOT belong to them.  
at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...