Translate

Showing posts with label masculinity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label masculinity. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 June 2020

The crisis of masculinity caused by the failure of Christianity and how Jews and Muslims can help

Westerners are suffering from a crisis of confidence caused by the failure of Christianity. We know Christianity has failed because it was undermined by feminism.

If Christianity was the antivirus you installed on your computer, but your computer was subsequently infected, you can deduce that your antivirus has failed.

Because feminism is based on gender equality, it has caused gender confusion, and gender confusion leads to gender dysphoria leading people to think they would be happier after sterilising themselves and mutilating their sex organs to masquerade as a member of the opposite sex. The prohibition in the Old Testament against men and women wearing each other's clothes was therefore very wise.

Once the men become women, who will protect the women? Presumably, nations whose men are known to have become women will be considered ripe for invasion and exploitation by men of other races and nations. This problem is easily solved by Jews and Muslims getting together for mutual protection to denounce Christianity as an illegitimate, idolatrous, blasphemous and absurd religion which is now confused for the liberalism that allowed in feminism to subvert the morals of Western men now no longer capable of even verbally defending the statues of their ancestors.

It is necessary to understand why Western Man is no longer capable of defending a principle.


  1. He lacks a moral education.
  2. A moral education is being aware that one is a member of a group who subscribes to a moral system ie religion.  
  3. He does not even know what a principle is, let alone what it is for, nor is he capable of having a discussion on the subject. 
  4. He is an atheist.
  5. He is also a nihilist who subscribes to no moral principle and does not even pretend he will not break the law or break a promise if he can get away with it.
  6. No moral philosopher in the West is capable of having an honest and honourable discussion about this because philosophers are a dime a dozen and no one will defend the right of any moral philosopher to say anything even if it is true, rational and moral, as long as it can be smeared as "offensive" or "hateful". 
  7. Western Man is subconsciously aware that any discussion on the subjects I raise will lead to a discussion about whether Christianity is kaput and whether democracy is dementia.
  8. Ordinary men do not feel powerful enough to have this discussion without risking losing their employment, income and status. 
  9. Supposedly powerful men in the political establishment do not feel able to have this discussion without risk of losing status and being denounced for saying something "hateful" or "extremist". 
  10. Men will do anything for sex, and I do mean anything. They will commit acts of violence and murder but they will also keep quiet and become women in order to maintain their access to sex. Men becoming women is part of beating feminists at their own game to acquire the feminine privilege they think women have.
  11. Feminine privilege is basically having more offers of sex than one is prepared to accept including a woman's prerogative to change her mind.  

Friday, 26 June 2020

Ten questions on masculinity

1) Can a man be said to be masculine if he has no principles?

2) Can a man be said to have principles if he does not subscribe to any religion or known moral system nor the three basic ones of submitting to Truth, Logic and Morality?

3) Is a man who refuses to declare his principles or his moral system a nihilist?

4) Is a nihilist someone saying "I have no principles I am prepared to defend"?

5) Would you ever choose or trust a leader you know to have no principles?

6) Is there a crisis of masculinity in the West?

7) If so, is this crisis of masculinity anything to do with the fact that no senior politician is prepared to defend a principle and this cowardice has percolated downwards?

8) Do women instinctively despise unprincipled men who are afraid of them and want to topple their statues?

9) What would happen to the nations of unprincipled men who cannot defend any principle verbally, let alone to the death?

10) Do unprincipled men deserve to live in an advanced civilisation?

Thursday, 14 May 2020

Is lockdown our opportunity to defenestrate the matriarchy and restore the patriarchy?

"All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." Do all civilisations rise in the same way and fall in a different way? But it seems to me that they rise in virtue ie patriarchy and fall in effeminacy ie matriarchy.

Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring.

Are we not obliged to choose the lesser evil if we are rational and moral human beings?

Is there no one prepared to discuss these matters even though they call themselves philosophers, rabbis or religious leaders?

The West is now suffering from a crisis in masculinity - a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values. In general, it can be said that women are content with lockdown while men are going crazy with cabin fever. Is now the time for feminism to be debunked when men and women react so differently to the same thing?

The cause of effeminacy is sexual liberation. Men will do anything for sex, including become women. They will also yield like women if submitting to immoral women gives them access to sex when previously they were warriors. It is now time to ask ourselves how civilisations fall.

Tuesday, 14 January 2020

Jewish and gentile masculinity

Masculinity is a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values.

All five world religions promote the patriarchy, therefore all of them promote the rearing of the next generation of men in families reared by married parents teaching them the principles of their respective religion.

Using this definition, any man prepared to defend a principle is considered masculine even if he does not have a six-pack, toned muscles or broad shoulders.

Friday, 8 December 2017

On masculinity and Robert Webb's book on How Not To Be A Boy


Monday, 19 June 2017

My definitions of masculinity and slut

Masculinity is not really about appearances, I would argue, but a state of mind prepared to uncompromisingly maintain and defend patriarchal moral values. By this definition no Western man is a man at all. At least, I do not know any man prepared to shame sluts to uncompromisingly support marriage - the essential ingredient of patriarchy.

My definition of a slut would include any woman who has had premarital sex. Since this definition would include the overwhelming majority of women including my female friends and myself, I conceived of a term that would distinguish between the suspected sex offender - the "mere" slut - and the convicted sex offender - the Slut Single Mother with illegitimate offspring.

Assuming that my definitions are terminologically correct, Western civilisation is clearly in a bad way.

This being so, only an Iranian-style one party theocracy would regenerate the degenerate West. Since this is about as unlikely to happen as a junkie calling the cops on his drug-dealer, it does appear that the collapse of Western civilisation will continue apace, to be replaced by Islam, when Westerners realise the following:

1) Orthodox Judaism is too high maintenance for degenerate atheists.

2) Christianity is kaput.

3) When you have eliminated impossible, then whatever is left, however improbable must be the answer: Islam is the answer.

4) If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism must be "Islam Lite". Secular Koranism is the Chicken Tikka Masala of Islam I have specially created for the British and is my gift to them. (I am well aware that most atheist British nationalists who prefer to celebrate their sexual liberation and fill their boots till they die will return my gift unopened, and this is why I predict that Western civilisation will continue to have its mind and body enfeebled by increasingly concentrated amounts of toxic feminism.)

Thursday, 1 June 2017

The state of British masculinity

https://redcap.slms.ucl.ac.uk/surveys/?s=MEJ8LPE3PL

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/major-study-state-masculinity-just-launched-vote-matters/?WT.mc_id=tmg_share_tw



Not looking good for men, is it?

What's upsetting men? 

Women are upsetting men by competing against them and men have noticed that the law has been rigged against men in favour of women.

Howard Dare on the parasitism, unsustainability, regressiveness and totalitarianism of matriarchy




They are angry and scared but don't know how to fight back because they know that no male politician represents their interests because all male politicians are also cucked. 


This neatly explains why men are killing themselves and why female psychologists think specialising in male mental health could be a good move because it is a growth area as increasing numbers of men manifest mental health issues after decades of being the beta male victims of feminism.


All Western men live in a matriarchy, and even Trump is cucked.

If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution, but patriarchy cannot exist without most people in society practising marriage.

I would say masculinity is a state of mind -  a state of mind prepared to uncompromisingly defend patriarchal moral values.

What are patriarchal moral values? The indispensable ingredient of patriarchy is marriage. MGTOW - Men Going Their Own Way [and refusing to marry] - are therefore a symptom of the disease that is matriarchy and part of the problem.

To defeat the matriarchy men must somehow get it together to abolish no fault divorce and repeal feminist employment legislation consisting of equal pay, maternity pay and sex discrimination legislation, until eventually marriage once again becomes an attractive bargain for men and the obvious occupation for women of child-bearing age. I am afraid this also means having to support and enforce the practice of slut-shaming and/or calling for an Islamic Revolution that will give you a one party theocracy that Iran now has.

http://theduran.com/10-ways-iran-democratic-modern-saudi-arabia/

Man created God so He could be conscripted into fighting on the male side of the battle of sexes, especially in the business of protecting and maintaining the practice of marriage.

Sluts and socialists walk hand in hand.

Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society and civilisation.

Feminism and socialism are atheist ideologies.

I ask my question at 1:29

Thursday, 25 May 2017

Infantilised Beta Male Victims of Feminism (BMVOF) not doing it for themselves


Cassie Jaye asks these Beta Male Victims of Feminism to close their eyes like little children, and they do, willingly infantilising themselves to please her, giggling at all her weak jokes while she reads her speech. Nuff said. 

What would a Real Man - now extinct in the Western world - have done?

He would have put her in her place by asking her why she was talking to them like children.

So, this is the woman whose hand the beta male victims of feminism are eagerly and hungrily eating out of: Cassie Jaye - saviouress of white men - who made The Red Pill. How nauseating to watch grown men abase themselves before her because they think she is so sexy, pretty and young and reminds them of Mary Poppins. They are so grateful to her for condescending to help them and for making so many sacrifices on their behalves.

Look at these pathetic beta male victims of feminism laughing at her every joke and hanging on to her every word, ready to lick her feet like the pathetic self-abnegating dogs they are, hiding under her skirts and enjoying being exactly where they are.

While Muslim terrorists go on suicide missions, beta male victims of feminism in the West are too afraid to challenge feminism as men and men alone.

Men against feminism should tell women against feminism their views don't and won't matter because they can defeat the matriarchy without their support. but if they can't they deserve to lose

Make no mistake, the beta male victims of feminism in the West are so cucked they dare not complain and challenge feminism on their own, but rely on women like Erin Pizzey and Cassie Jaye to be their protectoresses.

Even now these men without masculine pride refuse to take my advice to refuse all the help of these women who condescend to help them, and doing it for themselves WITHOUT ANY WOMEN AT ALL IN THEIR MOVEMENT. Only when these men kick out all the women from MRA and say they will do it for themselves will they get some respect, but this concept is all but incomprehensible to them.

These BMVOF appear to think they can find for themselves in men's rights activism a woman just for them who wants some sort of talking pet prepared to perform the occasional sexual service and take out the rubbish when asked to do so, grateful for a roof over his head and food his belly as well as a special place for him in her bed.

It would appear that women in men's rights activism do so to enjoy being in a position to pity men and thereby elevate their own status in relation to men in general and perhaps over their own husbands. "Look at me helping men!" they might say to their husbands.  "This is my charity work, look at me virtue signal at the expense of your sex. Aren't I clever and virtuous compared to you and your sex? Aren't you and your sex weak, pathetic and pitiable? You better do as I say then."

There is probably a reason why Western women are clamouring for their governments to admit more Muslim migrants. They would rather copulate with migrants who are at least real men prepared to strive and take what they want, than be forced to mate with these milquetoast beta male victims of feminism who do not even have any masculinity to insult.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3802351/Calais-aid-workers-regularly-having-SEX-migrants-Jungle-camp-FEMALE-charity-helpers-likely-sleep-refugee.html

Friday, 12 May 2017

Thoughts on masculinity and God after attending a debate on masculinity

https://j4mb.org.uk/2017/04/12/the-great-masculinity-debate-is-masculinity-toxic-or-a-tonic/

In a matriarchy, no man will be masculine or understand the real meaning of masculinity, because no man will understand that masculinity is not a masculine appearance or a masculine deportment, but a state of mind.

A masculine state of mind requires that men be prepared to defend patriarchal moral values and uncompromisingly support marriage as an institution.

Western Man will be incapable of defending any of the patriarchal moral values found in the Bible or discussing this subject rationally because he is now atheist and incapable of considering the long term national interest or thinking beyond what to do for the best beyond his own limited lifetime.

The Western male politician is in even a worse position, because he cannot even think beyond the next election, which is always less than five years away. And that this is why the West is going to hell in a handcart, because no Western journalist or politician will be seen to be publicly discussing this matter for fear of losing his job. This is hardly masculine, is it?

Denial is a feminine vice, and men who have been conquered by feminism take on the mindset of their conquerors.

A male virtue is dealing unflinchingly, rationally and honourably with the world and human nature as he finds it, without piteous cries inviting the pity of others whom he supplicates. The ideal male virtue encompasses the aristocratic virtue of magnanimity, nobility and noblesse oblige.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtus_(virtue)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noblesse_oblige

The degenerate, emasculated and effeminate man will only care about is filling his boots before he is dead. He won't give a fig about posterity or about how he will be regarded by it. Abstract concepts such as morality are not his area of interest, because the degenerate when reduced to his bare degraded essentials is only a unit of consumption, fungible and dispensable.

So there you have it: masculinity can only be preserved by a belief in God, the willingness to obey His laws by following and defending patriarchal moral principles as well as submitting to truth, logic and morality rather than indulging in feminine subjectivity, emotionalism, hysteria, irrationality and capriciousness.

What does patriarchy run on? It runs on marriage and the rules of behaviour required to respect this institution: the forbidding and punishing of extramarital sex.

Whether or not we believe in God, it is quite simply undeniable that God has been conscripted to protect the institution of marriage.  We have the benefit of God's guidance if we obey His laws against extramarital sex in 4:15, 4:16 and 24:2 of the Koran, or if we literally believe in God and allow Him to be the policeman in our minds. 

Western Man will now be having a fit of the vapours and calling for his smelling salts after reading this, for I have committed blasphemy against the matriarchy. Like the Queen of Hearts in Alice's Adventures, he will be joining the feminists who oppress him and calling for my head on a platter.

Saturday, 26 November 2016

What have George Osborne, Theresa May and Tom Holland got in common?

George Osborne

Theresa May

Tom Holland, cricket bore and classical historian

My, hasn't Donald Trump - not standing with his legs apart - got large hands!


Future social historians will ask themselves why the political classes of a degenerate liberal democracy are standing with their legs apart.

Can you imagine a real man like Donald Trump resorting to such a pathetic attempt to convey masculinity and command?

We now talk of fake news. There is now fake masculinity, fake femininity and fake displays of leadership and authority.

The less you have of something you want, the more you want to pretend you have it by adopting ridiculous positions of display.

I'm warning Michael Gove not to adopt that stance if he is still hoping to salvage his political career. It is pathetic that he's trying to get people to like him by appearing to angle for a gig on Strictly Come Dancing. It's only for retired and fallen politicians who need something to top up their income, rather like footballers whose careers have come to an end wanting compo from the Football Association for being sexually abused as a child when they never complained at the time, not even to their parents. If he wants to angle for a position, he should be up to challenging and discussing my ideas, or even more daringly, agreeing with them.
































Wednesday, 3 December 2014

Michael Voris: Emasculated Catholic clergy and feminine vices destroying boys







Alpha males marginalised in Catholic Church, just like the Episcopalian Church


"If there's one affected the crisis in the church that really gets very little play it's the utter destruction of boys and young men.  The church in being a loving mother to them should want them to go up and be good men. Instead in the constant pandering to the culture of the sissified male, many leaders in the church have thrown this and the previous generation of Catholic males under the bus as a result of their lack of zeal. Far from inspiring deeds of daring, many church leaders -  themselves glaring examples of a lack of manhood in masculinity - encourage little else than snivelling and narcissism. They don't encourage the young guys to fight the culture, they encourage them to join the culture. They give them nothing or next to nothing in the way of resisting and standing strong against a nation awash in pornography and illicit sex.  By extension they practically draw out love them all that is the dark side of the masculine and reduce the strength of the masculine.

Boys grow up to be men. The kind of man a boy grows up to be is influenced by many factors and today the vast majority of those factors are bad. Manhood is an object of ridicule or contempt depending on which TV show or commercial you happen to be tuned into at any given moment. The parishes have become the haunt up the feminine, which is one reason so many men simply stay away but this kind of talk is all about adults what about the boys are the young men stuck for the moment somewhere between boyhood and manhood, still young but not yet man closing in on adult manhood but with at least one foot still firmly planted in youth.

Many priests and bishops raised in the last generation or two are themselves victims and perpetrators at the same time. Why do we constantly hear from leaders everywhere about the need to advance more women in leadership roles in the Church, as the Archbishop of Chicago just said? There's nothing wrong with that in principle but it is wrong when it's done to the exclusion of men. The only men who seem to get advanced in the Church at least prominently are homosexuals, the homosexual-friendly crowd AKA the homosexualist or the careerist. Many good solid men among the ranks a priest and there are many true fathers are held down marginalized, demoted, shoved aside or whatever simply because they are strong men and the women who run the show and their effeminate counterpart priest friends don't like strong men. What in Hades kind of message does this send to boys who aren't blind to the cavalcade of women running the show and the clergy in most parishes in chanceries.

Where are all the men showcasing authentic masculinity teaching the faith at the religious at office in the parish where are the men who speak boldly and clearly about the need to become Catholic in an effort to battle evil and save your soul. Most of the womanly man who pass these days for, ahem, leaders would rather stay home and do their nails than stand up and decry the faults of ecumenism, universalism and indifference that has befallen the church.

Boys sense a lack of a fight, a lack of the rough-and-tumble, and with no one to encourage it they throw in the towel rather easily and give into the culture of the spoiled man.

Men generally do not learn what it is to become men by taking their cues from women. Don't take this wrong some moms my own are fantastic and instilling the desire to be men in their boys but they don't instil the masculinity itself: it takes men, fathers, comrades solid in the faith to do that. The only place this can of authentically occur in the world now given over to the earth goddess is the Catholic Church. This is why so many leaders today behave like conniving women stabbing opponents in the back in maneuvering behind the scenes like wanton tramps and jilted lovers with a score to settle. The old saying that hell hath no fury like a woman scorned applies today to just as many men as it does women. People in the Church allow this garbage to go on are destroying the masculinity of boys and young men and by that we mean they are raising up the next generation of sissies unable to cope with the crisis because they're more concerned with having their feelings affirmed than fighting personal and social evil. The sanctuaries should be occupied by men. Period, And not just any old men but strong men who boys can look up to and say in the back up their minds "I wanna be like him." 

Poor old Michael Voris. I talk to men like this EVERY DAY and there is nothing I can do at all to motivate these slackers. It is already too late for the Episcopalian Church. The infestation of the Catholic mind of this kind of rot is already bone deep but is only now manifesting itself.

It is like seeing a food item you did not cover properly already infested with maggots. You have to throw it away now, don't you?

To replace the moral vacuum that is 21st century - which is indistinguishable from PC Libtardism, I propose Secular Koranism.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html


An alternative Pope and an alternative Vatican in Detroit

Why do the women of the men's rights movement dislike me?

The Utility of God as a concept
"If God is said to be omnipotent, omniscient, unique and perfectly moral, then by contemplating the concept of God we necessarily contemplate these concepts too, which will assist us in the pursuit of science, justice and the maintenance of good government."







Why saying the most rational and moral laws are God's laws makes them more likely to be obeyed by more people for longer
If you say that the best laws are the ones you thought up you are not going to live forever even if you do become dictator.
If you say that the best laws are the ones your family thought up you are never really sure if your line may not die out at some point in the future.
If you say that the best laws are the ones that your political party thought up, you are never really sure if your kind of politics may one day fall out of favour eg feminism, fascism, communism, socialism, Nazism.
If you say that the best laws are the ones that were thought up by the god of your people you are never really sure if your people will always have a homeland to come home to eg Jews.
If you say that the best laws are the ones thought up by a UNIVERSAL God who is OMNIPOTENT, OMNISCIENT and MORALLY-PERFECT for all people of all nations for the whole wide world then you have more of a chance of keeping those laws in force.

Thursday, 27 November 2014

UKIP could do better if Nigel Farage were bolder but he is a risk-averse moral coward happy to tread water

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/sorry-nigel-farage-women-just-4697943


Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...